Open main menu

User talk:Atsme/Archive 2

< User talk:Atsme
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
← Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 →

Contents

File:06 woa largestfwfish 300.jpg

 
File:06 woa largestfwfish 300.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jtalledo (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Email

As it states on my talk page I am currently busy and have no time for wiki issues. Equally we keep communication on wiki so that others may follow it. If there is some copyright issue with something that you have evidence for please take it to an admin board or possibly forward the information to the OTRS system. --Herby talk thyme 08:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:UpToMyXInAlligators Image.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:UpToMyXInAlligators Image.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 12:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File:ShotUTheBird IMG 1992WP.jpg

 
File:ShotUTheBird IMG 1992WP.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2001:8B0:9F0:6034:4C08:75F8:5BAB:ED11 23:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Volunteer Response Team

Hi there; I've tagged the recent uploads attributed to the Earthwave Society as confirmed for OTRS permission; if you have time, could you check to see if I've missed any? Thanks, Microchip08 (talk) 03:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Microchip08 - thank you for your efforts, and I will check to make sure. AtsmeConsult 04:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Larval paddlefish.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Larval paddlefish.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Smooth_O (talk) 09:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Smooth_O - Earthwave Society provided a blanket license, and submitted it via email as follows: Earthwave Society has granted a blanket license under (CC BY-SA 3.0) to Wikipedian User:Atsme to upload images and stock video footage including but not limited to:

  • sturgeon (beluga and all North American species)
  • bowfin
  • paddlefish
  • alligator gar
  • piping plovers
  • least terns
  • zebra mussels

AtsmeConsult 09:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hi Atsme, I have question regarding this picture. Was it made underwater with underwater housing, I know Olympus xxxx series were popular with that housing that time. And how come size is biger than official, was that black part added ? Thanx. --Mile (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Mile - it was a macro shot with the (8mp) 8080WZ with macro attachment in an Ikelite underwater housing with a special macro port and Ikelite digital strobes. The eel was in a dark crevice so I had to clean-up a bit of backscatter, then simply punched the blacks for a clean background. I enlarged the shot using resizer/optimizer software which explains the larger mp size. Hope that helps. Atsme😊Consult 16:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome, i am sorry it didnt pass. Good foto. --Verde78 (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Verde78 thank you for nominating it. The image actually was promoted to FP on en.wiki so while it is a bit disappointing that it wasn't promoted here, I take comfort knowing it was promoted to FP elsewhere. 😊 Atsme😊Consult 12:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


Category:Wikipedia_images_by_user:Atsme

Fayenatic london (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jack Brizendine.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jack Brizendine.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 23:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File formats

Hi Atsme - nice bird pics, thanks for adding them! One small request when uploading, if you could put the location ("Fort Worth, TX", etc.) in the 'Description' part of the upload form, instead of the 'Additional info' section. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Certainly - thank you. Atsme😊Consult 14:12, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

  * * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you, George Chernilevsky. I love the spirit of the holidays, so here's wishing you a big ole Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!! Atsme 📞 05:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your kind words. Abyssal (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Commons essays

Hi Atsme, for your question about essays, I found this. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Spotted Trunkfish.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spotted Trunkfish.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Trupial_(Icterus_icterus).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trupial_(Icterus_icterus).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Atsme,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Texas invasive Musk Thistle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | українська | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Hello Atsme/Archive 2,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Outdoors Unlimited Cover.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 02:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your user page

Hello, Atsme. I noticed that you have the following code on your user page: {{User category|Atsme}}. That template is for use on category pages, not user pages. Would you please remove it from your user page? Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Not sure what you're talking about, Auntof6 Atsme 📞 13:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Arches Fingers IMG 0058 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arches Fingers IMG 0058 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Longnose batfish.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Longnose batfish.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Good evening Atsme,

Thanks for your comment. Will your version be used altenatively? Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome, Famberhorst - the alternative version was not submitted as an FP alt but there's no reason it couldn't be. You are certainly welcome to add it as an alt. Atsme 📞 19:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your effort, Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pink anemonefish BWP.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pink anemonefish BWP.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition prize

Thanks for the awesome images! Antony-22 (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Antony-22 - what an honor!! Atsme 📞 21:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Venna Lee and L.F. Wilson (1970s).jpg

File:Venna Lee and L.F. Wilson (1970s).jpg

Noticed your question for Yann, but it does appear to have some problems. There is no source link to verify the license, it's a scan of photo (so no useful metadata) and the source claims "own" when I doubt you are the photographer. Betty Wills probably needs to go to COM:Contact OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Alexis Jazz, actually I am the photog, and I do own the copyright, and I added the link to the website on the image. While I understand the good work our volunteers do on Commons, I believe this is one instance where AGF should have been the priority. Our job here is to protect WMF and this project from liability, not to protect the copyright holder from all potential infringements - we are neither copyright attorneys nor enforcers of copyright law. As a member of OTRS, I am hoping to help clarify some of the gray areas. Atsme 📞 23:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Wait wut, you are OTRS? But.. you really should know better it would seem? And combining "own work" with "Betty Wills Family Historical Collection" is really confusing as it is not obvious you are Betty Wills. The author should also link to your username in this case to clarify that.
This is honestly that one in a thousand cases where somebody uploading a photo from a family archive actually is the photographer. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, Alexis Jazz, unfortunately no - not exactly an isolated incident. There are other cases but that's neither here nor there at this point. My work on OTRS does not grant me any special privileges. I'm only human, so there's always the possibility that I'll make a mistake - and I actually do appreciate our checks and balances - they are a good thing when applied properly and when AGF. I upload my images using the special upload wizard - its fast and easy. If I have images that are not mine, or that are in the public domain, I typically include the actual "gettin' place". Most of my notices and licensing on Commons typically includes Betty Wills (Atsme) somewhere as the source or on the license as exampled in this file. I try to limit mixing my two identities to avoid potential weirdos *lol* but I guess it really doesn't matter considering I was outed back in 2015 on en.Wikipedia via my photos (Google photo match), so anyone who has the mind to, can trace me back. I occasionally add both names to my licenses here - but keep in mind, I just uploaded those images - the ink was still wet on the description when they were tagged.😂 That's why I emphasize AGF. Atsme 📞 00:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I don't know exactly how OTRS works, but couldn't you create an OTRS ticket that links your username to your real name, put "Betty Wills" (without link) as the author and slap that OTRS-ticket on all your own work? That way your uploads will rarely be tagged and you don't have to publicly mix your identities.
I am now also dealing with Revision of File:Madeleine Doran Norman Lenburg Photographer 4 7 1979.jpg. And we can't assume good faith there, can we? I mean, I do assume they are acting in good faith but this doesn't work for us. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Venna_Lee_and_L.F._Wilson_(1970s).jpg&diff=next&oldid=305504721 also looks suspicious to "us". (people looking for copyvios) There is already a CC-BY-SA license template and {{No permission since}} is removed while adding "CC-BY-SA 4.0" to the permission field, this just looks suspicious. The link to the site doesn't seem to help much either because the entire site doesn't seem to really work. Maybe it's my computer, but all I see is a lava lamp. I think the easiest solution is probably for you to create an OTRS ticket for yourself and use that on your uploads. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
*ah* you already did. So why not use that ticket? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
You show the Author as Betty Wills and link to a source that is © 2016 The Wills Ranch. That needs explaining. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I have added info to clarify this. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
No need to go above and beyond the call of duty. Atsme 📞 16:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:GorillaBourbon.jpg

 
File:GorillaBourbon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel, Túrelio: this really was a poor speedy deletion.

  • Atsme is an OTRS member and claims this is own work. (Google cache)
  • The site linked to "prove" the copyvio is a blog, a Czech Blogger/Wordpress really, nothing but user content.
  • I don't even see any picture of a gorilla drinking bourbon there. Derivative work though, so I guess Atsme photoshopped a bourbon bottle on a gorilla that was already here?
  • That page is hotlinking a ton of images from Wikimedia.
  • It also copied some information from Wikipedia.
  • There is no clear date on anything.

  - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Yep, I just warned him on his TP - in fact, Commons has a public domain image of the gorilla which further validates that it is in the public domain - see File:WesternLowlandGorillaP2.jpg and the rest come from other public domain sites, such Pixabay. This is clearly stepping over the line of what volunteers should be doing. I am working on making some positive changes to put an end such bold mistakes. Atsme 📞 13:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel spots many copyvios correctly, but I noticed before every now and then he would provide a source that most likely got the image from Commons. You are not entirely free from blame either though: instead of "own", you should have linked the source image(s). But even if you did: Patrick often manages to spot and tag images that should be deleted, but provides an incorrect rationale. So he's right, but for the wrong reason, and this is not the first time. I haven't figured out what to do with that yet. In this case: while I can't see the original image, I suspect it's out of COM:SCOPE. A gorilla actually drinking bourbon (not photoshopped) would be in scope though, so when are you planning your next trip to the zoo.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Noop - it is in scope - File in use in another Wikimedia project - A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough. The file needs to be replaced. Templates and user boxes are also in its future. It can also be is being used for the article about photoshopping. Atsme 📞 14:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Please note the source of the bottle and glass as well in the file description. Thanks. Storkk (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE also says "that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope". The image was used on a user talk page. And there is "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality". I think I can do a better job of the bourbon gorilla, and since I kind of like it, I probably will. (when I know the source for the glass and bottle) We already have various examples of photoshop. Just a few of mine: Jorge gone missing, gnomes stole your coffee, false price tag, returned my book to the library, the invention of color and the Not Old John tower. (why?) I also have some funny not-very-educational work, but I normally wouldn't upload that. If I had known that was considered in scope.. (I still can't upload it because I never paid much attention to copyright for those) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Whatcha think? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
A tad over-processed - the detail in the glass is lost. Atsme 📞 21:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
On purpose - I try to match the sharpness of the original gorilla picture. I don't think I can make it much sharper. (maybe a little bit) But that's all you have to say? Can you do better? You do know I've found Atsme self-portrait.jpg?   (no worries, I won't turn you into a duck or anything.  ) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Consider it a learning experience, not a competition.  ) Ok, so you forced me to enhance and replace the original version, which I just did. As for my selfie - I've already been outed over at en.WP and all I got was an unpology. After that root canal, I figured what the heck, it sometimes seems that conspiracy theorists abound on en.WP, so there was no sense in my trying to maintain anonymity. I went ahead and disclosed whatever I thought might possibly create a COI and added it to my user page. Anyway - you seem energetic so I'm wondering if you've been participating over at Commons:Featured picture candidates? If not, you should - it's a fun place to work. Oh, and just a little tidbit for you - too much sharpening introduces more noise issues than the softness issues it resolves, so use it sparingly. Atsme 📞 23:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I know, I don't use sharpen often. I also updated my version, I had already created it before I saw your new version. I see you've gone the other way and tried to match the sharpness of the rest of the picture to the additions. I'm still not happy about mine, but I think it looks a little bit more realistic. Glassware is just hard. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Wrongful deletion

Hi. I've read the discussion above. Please accept my apologies for this speedy nomination and for not having clicked on the image at http://eko-eko-eko.blog.cz/ which links to a Wikipedia in Czech page. Neverthess I've not deleted this image; it's an Administrator who has. In addition and contrary as you're stating you've been consulted about the deletion 11 June 2018 at 11:34, as you can see at the section above. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

No problem - suggestion - before tagging images uploaded by veteran editors with a SPEEDY, try notifying via TP discussion first - a speedy delete doesn't give one much of an opportunity to explain or fix an issue that was overlooked. Communication can be an amazingly productive tool...and it's free. Atsme 📞 16:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright info

Notice To Permissions

I sent an email to WP permissions with blanket permission under a CC BY-SA 3.0 [1] license that includes all images I upload and further indicate belong to me. Atsme 📞 11:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, Earthwave Society granted permission to Atsme to upload their images under a CC BY-SA 3.0 [2] license. They also submitted blanket permission under CC BY-SA in an email. 11:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Squid_colors_2.tif, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Squid colors.tif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Squid colors 2.tif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your nice touch, it's very nice, Happy Holiday to you too...

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Flatworm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flatworm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Atsme/Archive 2".