Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Heike Huslage-Koch!

-- 15:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Heike Huslage-Koch!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply


Hallo, meist reicht es nicht aus, Bilder nur in eine Kategorie einzuordnen. Aufnahmen von Personen sollten beispielsweise nicht nur in eine Kategorie für die Veranstaltung aufgenommen werden, wo du sie erwischt hast. Wichtiger ist die passende Personenkategorie für den Abgebildeten. Wenn er noch keine eigene Kategorie seines Namens hat, sollte er in die übergeordnete Kategorie, z. B. für deutsche Schriftsteller Category:Writers from Germany. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank für die Infos und Tipps und vor allem auch für die Korrektur beim Foto von Uli Herrmann, Sitacuisses (talk). Da habe ich mir in dem Messetrubel wohl den falschen Namen notiert. Die Bildbeschreibungen werde ich ändern und die Namen der Personen einfügen. Bei den Kategorien bin ich etwas unsicher, weil die Links manchmal rot, also nicht funktionabel, und manches Mal korrekt blau angezeigt werden. Das Problem habe ich übrigens auch bei den Fotos auf meiner Benutzerseite; irgendwie kann ich die nicht korrekt verlinken. Ich habe auf deiner Benutzerseite gesehen, dass das scheinbar schon geht - würdest du mir bitte sagen, wie du das machst? Herzliche Grüße Lesekreis (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kategorielinks erscheinen hier dann rot, wenn die Kategorieseite noch nicht angelegt ist. Um sie anzulegen reicht es für den Anfang aus, auf den roten Link zu klicken und auf der dann erscheinenden Bearbeitungsseite die passenden übergeordneten Kategorien einzutragen. Vorher sollte man sich natürlich über den richtigen Namen der Kategorie Gedanken machen, insbesondere bei mehrdeutigen Namen. Mehr dazu unter Commons:Kategorien. Andere Links können hier beispielsweise rot erscheinen, weil sich deine Zielseite in einem anderen Namensraum befindet und auf Commons unter dem Namen nicht existiert (aber existieren könnte, denn hier gibt es nicht nur Kategorien, sondern auch Seiten). Wir sind hier im Projekt Commons, und Links in der deutschen Wikipedia müssen mit dem Präfix :de: gekennzeichnet werden, z. B. de:Frankfurter Buchmesse oder maskiert [[:de:Frankfurter Buchmesse|Frankfurter Buchmesse]], was Frankfurter Buchmesse ergibt. Die Bilder auf meiner Benutzerseite in der deutschen Wikipedia habe ich eingebunden wie unter de:Hilfe:Bilder#Galerie beschrieben. Ich hoffe, das war in etwa die Frage. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nochmals ganz herzlichen Dank für deine Unterstützung, Sitacuisses! Ich habe jetzt noch ein wenig nachbearbeitet, aber das meiste hast du ja schon erledigt. Werde mich noch besser einlesen, denn ganz so "Wiki" ist das hier ja doch nicht. :-) Lg Lesekreis (talk) 22:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rainald Goetz edit

danke im namen aller für das foto von rainald! ich habe lange versucht, selbst eins zu organisieren, kam aber nicht dazu, und er, den ich gut kenne, hatte keine zeit... Maximilian (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

oh, das freut mich, hoffe, es gefällt ihm genauso gut wie mir. Rainald Goetz ist nicht nur ein großartiger Autor, sondern auch sehr sympathischer Typ. LG Lesekreis (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Frankfurter Buchmesse.JPG edit

I saw your entry to the "Surface textures" photo challenge. I don't think this counts as a surface texture as it appears to be completely flat. It has a pattern but this is printed. Additionally, is this a photograph of a poster or artwork made by someone other than you? If so then it will be copyright and it is likely to be deleted. -- Colin (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Colin, thank you for information. I can`t believe that there are problems due to copyright. But the subject and the task I have probably not met clearly. The page looked so empty, I hope there will still set many more appropriate photos. Greetings Lesekreis (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Heike Huslage-Koch,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo Challenge Silver edit

  Photo Challenge – Second Place
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Nothing ventured, nothing gained.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Proverbs and idioms, in March 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

File:Brooklyn Bridge NYC 2014.jpg edit

I don't believe there was snow on Brooklyn Bridge on May 3. ;-) Could you please fix the date in the information? Lupo 11:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

yes, this is really unbelievable, sorry, I corrected. Thanks for the info, Lupo, greetings Lesekreis (talk) 11:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bee on whitehorn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kulac 07:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo Challenge Gold edit

  Photo Challenge Winner
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Easter bunny.JPG won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Traditions, in March-April 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge Silver edit

  Photo Challenge – Second Place
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Bee on whitehorn.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Flowers and insects, in May 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo challenge - August edit

Hallo Lesekreis,
ich hab gerade deine zwei Bilder zu Urlaub gesehen... und sie gefallen mir gut, nur könnte ich mir gut vorstellen, dass die Titelbilder der Bücher geschützt sind. Vielleicht das Buch aufschlagen und so photographieren, dass man den Text nicht allzugut/nur teilweise lesen kann?
Ganz liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

hi liebe Anna reg, vielen Dank für die Info. Leider kann ich die Fotos nicht in einer neuen Version aufnehmen, sie sind ja in einem längst vergangenen Urlaub entstanden. Ich werde die Verlage (Rowohlt und Fischer) anschreiben und um Erlaubnis für die Veröffentlichung bitten. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass da keine Einwände bestehen. Ansonsten werde ich einen Admin um Löschung bitten. LG Lesekreis (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oje. Längst vergangener Urlaub ist in diesem Fall blöd - Urlaub ist auf Bilder von diesem Sommer (Juli & August 2914) beschränkt, um die Teilnehmer dazu zu motivieren, ihre Kameras zu zücken...
Ich werde gleich versuchen, die Zeitbeschränkung noch stärker hervorzuheben (z.B. in rot schreiben). Schönen Abend noch, --Anna reg (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
hm, ich hatte das so verstanden, dass die Fotos zwar aktuell hoch geladen werden müssen, dass es aber keine Einschränkung bezüglich der Entstehungszeit der Bilder gibt?! Wenn es allerdings so ist, wie du sagst, werde ich sie löschen lassen. Dann erübrigt sich auch meine Anfrage bei den Verlagen. LG Lesekreis (talk) 23:26, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Punkt vier in der Checkliste - jetzt dunkelrot. :-> Im Jänner, Februar und März gab's auch teilweise zusätzlich Einschränkungen zum Aufnahmedatum (z.B. bei Traditions) - unter anderem, weil in Datenbanken suchen nicht Colins Idee von Photowettbewerben ist. In den letzten Monaten waren alle Bewerbe ohne Einschränkungen, weil unterschiedliche Regeln für verschiedene Bewerbe anscheinend schwierig sind - und die Zusatzeinschränkung bedeutet, dass noch mehr zu kontrollieren ist. Nachdem ich beide Seiten nachvollziehen kann, bin ich nicht ganz sicher, wie ich zu den Einschränkungen stehe... (in diesem Fall find ich's grad ein bisschen schade, weil deine Bilder sehr gut zum Thema gepasst hätten)
Damit aber gute Nacht, Anna reg (talk) 23:44, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
hi liebe Anna reg, alles ist gut! ;-) Die Fotos sind gelöscht und ich ärgere mich eigentlich nur ein bisschen, weil ich es vorab nicht gesehen hatte. Werde in Zukunft besser aufpassen. Vielleicht kann ich noch ein ähnliches Foto "arrangieren" - Urlaub mit Sandstrand und Muscheln ist in diesem Jahr leider nicht geplant. LG Lesekreis (talk) 11:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ich hab auch schon überlegt, ob 'Urlaub' simulieren geht... oder ich versuch, Leute aufzunehmen, die hier auf Urlaub sind... noch war ich nicht kreativ genug. (Deshalb hatte ich mich ja so über deine Bilder gefreut - es waren zwei sehr treffende Illustrationen des Themas). --Anna reg (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo Challenge Silver edit

  Photo Challenge – Second Place
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Steckfrisur.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Hair, in August 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Adventkalender ;-> edit

Hallo Lesekreis,
danke für dein Lob und deinen Beitrag zum Adventkalender. Ich wollte nur kurz fragen, ob du extra den 11. ausgesucht hast? Oder hast du's für II. gehalten? (Nur grad am überlegen, ob ich zur zwei was schreiben soll oder besser nicht...)
Ganz liebe Grüße, --Anna reg (talk) 00:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Anna, ja, habe bewusst denn 11. ausgesucht, weil es neben dem 24. das größte Päckchen in deinem Kalender ist und das wollte ich dir zukommen lassen. ;-) Hättest du lieber eine chronologische "Vergabe", soll ich ändern? Schönen Tag Lesekreis (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh, danke. Interessant, auf die Größe der Päckchen hab ich bei meinen Überlegungen (fast) gar nicht geachtet... ;-> (der 24. ist schon extra ein großes Packerl)
Und nein, ist ok. Die Türchen bei den Adventkalendern werden ja auch nicht von allen in der richtigen Reihenfolge geöffnet... ;->
Liebe Grüße, --Anna reg (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo Challenge Gold edit

  Photo Challenge Winner
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Playing with water, light and leaves (Fagus sylvatica).JPG won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Leaves, in November 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playing with water, light and leaves (Fagus sylvatica).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - March - Black and White edit

Please can you help translate the restriction for the black & white challenge: "The photos must be taken in March 2015 and a maximum of three entries can be submitted per photographer.". Sorry for the late change. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have also amended the description to be clearer: "black & white photography (not a colour photo of a black & white subject)". -- Colin (talk) 10:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have clarified (with examples) that Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - March - Steps, Stairs and Staircases includes ladders and step stools. -- Colin (talk) 10:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

okay, is done ;-) Lesekreis (talk) 14:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

You have voted incorrectly (two 2/3, one 1/3, no 3/3). Please can you amend. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

You have voted incorrectly (two 2/3, one 1/3, no 3/3). Please can you amend. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

oh, I'm so sorry Colin (talk) - I corrected both Lesekreis (talk) 21:41, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  Photo Challenge – Second Place
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Wine corks.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Collections, Collecting and Collectables, in June 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

You've voted wrongly on this challenge (3, 2, 2, 1). Please can you correct your vote ASAP. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

oh damn, sorry Colin (talk), I have corrected. Lesekreis (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

November Photo Challenge edit

Sorry I didn't get organised enough with the October challenge themes. I've proposed a couple of themes for November and it would be good to agree and translate these + watchlist soon. Hope you can help. -- Colin (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

A biscuit treat for you! edit

  Thanks for your message on Photo Challenge. Would you help pick a theme for January? Colin (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Cool... that makes me happy! ;-) I've already posted my suggestions on the talk page. Merry Christmas and a happy new year ... and many, many thanks for the biscuit! Heike (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Photo Challenge Translation January 2016 edit

I hope you can help translate these challenges. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 16:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

done! ;-) Heike Huslage-Koch (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - June - Manufacturing edit

I noticed you removed an incorrect entry to the photo challenge. I do appreciate help in fixing malformed entries (and wish we had a more automated interface) but you just removed the entry rather than fixed it. This newbie clearly didn't know the wiki syntax. I looked at their uploads and found that File:Bread Making.jpg was likely the image they meant to add. So I added this and left them a message. I think we need to try hard to help newbies, which the photo challenge seems to attract. They are the future of Commons, after all. -- Colin (talk) 09:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

hi Colin, mostly I correct the links to the images and insert them in the right place. Here I have unfortunately found nothing. But now everything is all right ;-) Heike Huslage-Koch (talk) 11:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:John Burnside.jpg edit

 
File:John Burnside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Frankfurter Buchmesse 2011 Ehrengast Island.jpg edit

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Frankfurter Buchmesse 2011 Ehrengast Island.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 22:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Frankfurter Buchmesse 2011 Ehrengast Island.jpg edit

 
File:Frankfurter Buchmesse 2011 Ehrengast Island.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 05:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Library Walk 36.JPG edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Library Walk 36.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 09:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply