Tan Khaerr
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Drapeau Haut Conseil pour l'unité de l'Azawad.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Soldats maliens à Kadji.PNG
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Soldats maliens à Kadji.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Soldats maliens à Kadji.PNG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Militaire malien à Kidal 2013.JPG
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Militaire malien à Kidal 2013.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Militaire malien à Kidal 2013.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
|
File:Second tour des élections présidentielles à Kidal 2013.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
File:Abubakar Shekau1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
File:Réfugié kurde à Mursitpinar octobre 2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Vue de Kobane2.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Vue de Kobane1.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
File:Massacre de Machecoul.jpg
edit- Please, stop restoring a small version of this file as a better one exists.
- Merci d'arrêter de restaurer une petite version de cette image, alors qu'une meilleure existe.
- Blaue Max (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Abubakar Shekau octobre 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Attentat de Jos - 20 mai 2014.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Attentat de Jos - 20 mai 2014.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Attentat de Jos - 20 mai 2014.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Hi, if you upload a VOA file, please be careful with the date. VOA files from after June 2013 have to be deleted. Your file can stay, I corrected the date. Jcb (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Yahia Abou El Houmâm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mise à jour au sujet de VOA
editBonjour, En 2014 dans la page Commons:Bistro/archives/2014/11#Sur VOA, vous aviez posé une question, à laquelle j'avais répondu en fonction de la situation telle qu'elle était à ce moment-là. Depuis lors, la situation a changé, en ce que VOA a modifié les informations de son site. La situation actuelle, telle que comprise par Commons, est que tout ce qui est créé par les employés de VOA est dans le domaine public aux États-Unis, quelle qu'en soit la date de création. Il est donc maintenant possible de verser sur Commons des documents créées par VOA, sans distinction entre ce qui a été créé avant ou après juillet 2013. Pour plus d'information, vous pouvez consulter la page Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Original materials of VOA. Notez toutefois que cela ne change pas le fait que cela s'applique seulement à ce qui est créé par les employés de VOA, et ne s'applique pas à ce qui est repris par VOA à partir d'autres sources. Ainsi, en ce qui concerne la vidéo qui faisait l'objet de votre seconde question de 2014, il n'y a pas d'indication précise de source, mais, comme vous le notiez, les images sont marquées d'un autre logo, ce qui semble indiquer que les images n'ont pas été crées par des employés de VOA, bien que le texte du commentaire semble être de VOA. Par prudence, on devrait donc considérer que les images ne peuvent pas être versées sur Commons. À moins bien sûr de savoir à quoi correspond ce logo, de pouvoir remonter à la source et de vérifier si la source est libre. Cordialement, -- Asclepias (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Merci pour vos réponses. Tan Khaerr (talk) 21:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Bonjour File:Militaires nigériens Diffa Mars 2015.jpg, File:Militaires nigériens sur le pont Doutchi.jpg, File:CJTFMichika1.jpg, File:AbubakarShekauVOA.JPG, and File:Abubakar Shekau 2 octobre 2014.jpg ont été supprimées 1. Donc finalement les images de VOA après juin 2013 sont elles admissibles sur commons ou ne le sont-elles pas? Il semble y avoir une certaine confusion à ce sujet. Cordialement. Tan Khaerr (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour, C'est une étrange demande de suppression. Le demandeur semble baser sa demande de suppression sur le fait qu'une ancienne page des politiques d'utilisation de VoA, qui comportait une mention non commerciale et était ainsi en contradiction avec d'autres pages de VoA, a été retirée. La page actuelle des politiques d'utilisation de VoA comporte la mention de domaine public. Cela ne semble pas un argument de suppression. Au contraire. Ce qui a d'ailleurs été mentionné par un autre utilisateur lors de la discussion. Sur les cinq fichiers supprimés, le sysop a re-supprimé quatre fichiers qui avaient été restaurés après la clarification du mois dernier. L'autre fichier est un nouveau téléversement fait depuis la clarification. La demande n'explique pas pourquoi elle visait seulement ces cinq fichiers parmi les centaines de fichiers de VoA qui ont été restaurés ou récemment téléversés. Selon votre page de discussion, vous n'avez pas été avisé avant la suppression. Si vous l'aviez été, vous auriez pu demander des explications et intervenir lors de la discussion. C'est pour cela que la procédure prévoit un avis. Je vais contacter le sysop qui a fait la suppression et lui demander de vous répondre directement ici pour qu'il explique la raison de sa décision. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Bonjour File:Militaires nigériens Diffa Mars 2015.jpg, File:Militaires nigériens sur le pont Doutchi.jpg, File:CJTFMichika1.jpg, File:AbubakarShekauVOA.JPG, and File:Abubakar Shekau 2 octobre 2014.jpg ont été supprimées 1. Donc finalement les images de VOA après juin 2013 sont elles admissibles sur commons ou ne le sont-elles pas? Il semble y avoir une certaine confusion à ce sujet. Cordialement. Tan Khaerr (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Résultat de la démarche : Le sysop a refusé de corriger son erreur sur la question des dates. Il prétend qu'il y aurait eu consensus pour la suppression, alors qu'en fait seul le proposant s'était exprimé pour la suppression. Il aurait voulu que vous fassiez une demande de restauration, alors que pourtant quatre des fichiers venaient d'être restaurés récemment à la suite de la décision de restauration précitée. Mais un autre sysop s'en est chargé à sa place et a restauré les fichiers. (1)
- Toutefois, maintenant qu'on peut voir les images et leur source, il est évident que deux des cinq images ne sont pas de VOA, ce qui est clairement mentionné dans la page de VOA. Elles devront probablement être supprimées pour cette raison.
- -- Asclepias (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
File:AbubakarShekauVOA.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Abubakar Shekau 2 octobre 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Syrian civil wr map
editDone -- Emreculha (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Tan Khaerr (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
edit
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Al Nouri Mosque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
File:BarkhaneGao2017(8).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
File tagging File:BarkhaneGao2017(17).jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:BarkhaneGao2017(17).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(16).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(15).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(14).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(13).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(12).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(11).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(10).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(9).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(7).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(6).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(5).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(4).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(3).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(2).jpg
- File:BarkhaneGao2017(1).jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ben non, ce n'est pas une video de France 3 mais de l'ALAT. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ben non (encore); ce n'est d'ailleurs pas la première fois que vous attribuez des licenses libres à des captures de vidéos qui ne le sont pas. Le logo en bas à gauche dément d'ailleurs votre affirmation. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove deletion requests
edit
Warning
editDo not recreate deleted content. Jcb (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The license of File:BarkhaneGao2017(8) is valid, this file does not have to be deleted. No justification was given to me. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel explained the problem to you. And please keep the discussion where it started. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: No, Patrick Rogel is wrong. The image was posted on youtube with the license Creative Commons CC BY. It is valid on Wikimedia Commons. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- He explained to you that although it was posted as CC at Youtube, this was not done by the copyright holder. Only the copyright holder is in a position to release something into a CC license. Jcb (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: No! still wrong. Patrick Rogel says that the image comes from the ALAT, it is false, it is clearly a program and a report of France 3 which has been published on its youtube channel Creative Commons CC BY. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- So why do you think the ALAT logo is there? Jcb (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: It's not the logo of ALAT. It's an anniversary logo. And why do you think the France 3 logo is there? You obviously have not even bothered to play the video. It is well indicated in the video, that the images (which I imported) were made by journalists as part of a report. The presenter of the program quotes the names of the journalists, then said at the end of the program that the images were shot by France 3. Tan Khaerr (talk) 20:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- If you receive a clear warning, typically containing the word 'warning', that means that you may get blocked if you do it again, in this case 'do not recreate deleted content'. If you disagree with a deletion, you go to COM:UDR instead. Reuploading the file is strictly forbidden. Consider this as your last warning. If an administrator spots you doing this again, you will almost certainly be blocked on sight. Jcb (talk) 15:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: It's not the logo of ALAT. It's an anniversary logo. And why do you think the France 3 logo is there? You obviously have not even bothered to play the video. It is well indicated in the video, that the images (which I imported) were made by journalists as part of a report. The presenter of the program quotes the names of the journalists, then said at the end of the program that the images were shot by France 3. Tan Khaerr (talk) 20:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- So why do you think the ALAT logo is there? Jcb (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: No! still wrong. Patrick Rogel says that the image comes from the ALAT, it is false, it is clearly a program and a report of France 3 which has been published on its youtube channel Creative Commons CC BY. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- He explained to you that although it was posted as CC at Youtube, this was not done by the copyright holder. Only the copyright holder is in a position to release something into a CC license. Jcb (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: No, Patrick Rogel is wrong. The image was posted on youtube with the license Creative Commons CC BY. It is valid on Wikimedia Commons. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel explained the problem to you. And please keep the discussion where it started. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
File:BarkhaneGao2017(8).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Faylaq al-Sham in al-Fuah and Kafriya 21-7-2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Blessé Beaupuy.jpg
editHi Tan Khaerr, just out of curiosity: why did you revert the image Blessé Beaupuy.jpg (Image) back to the yellowish version? Best, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 15:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
editHello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
|
File:Attentat Nyanya VOA2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:861:4005:E950:E47D:A56B:5130:A2A1.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
|
File:Bataille d'al-Bab 22 février 2017 (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Resapp.
And also:
- File:Bataille d'al-Bab 22 février 2017 (3).jpg ( Nominator : Resapp - Reason : Taken off Youtube source= )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
File:GATIA flag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Interrogatoire du prince de Talmont - Jules Benoit-Lévy.jpg
- File:Mort du général Moulin - Jules Benoit-Lévy.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Le combat de La Guyonnière - Alexandre Bloch.png
editCopyright status: File:Le combat de La Guyonnière - Alexandre Bloch.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Le combat de La Guyonnière - Alexandre Bloch.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
|
File:InfoboxHez.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
File:InfoboxHez.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)