Happa

Request for usurpation

Hello, Happa. A request has been made at Commons:Changing username/usurp requests to usurp, or "take over", your username because you have zero contributions, and another user would like to use it to edit.

If you have an email set in your preferences, you should be getting an email from a bureaucrat or changing username clerk explaining how to consent or object to this process.

If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to use the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one).

If you do nothing: the request will be filled after seven days, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time.

If you object to being renamed: please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation.

Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username.

Thank you for your time. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Happa111 (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Happa!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:Tadeusz Nartowski - bukiet.JPG

File:Tadeusz Nartowski - bukiet.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Cancre (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Tadeusz Nartowski - park.JPG

File:Tadeusz Nartowski - park.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Cancre (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Jan Ciemniewski Chryzantemy.JPG

File:Jan Ciemniewski Chryzantemy.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Cancre (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Happa!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Kazimierz Stępień.jpg was uncategorized on 29 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Krzysztof Ziołkowski.jpg was uncategorized on 29 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kazimierz Schilling.jpg was uncategorized on 29 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Tablice Karola Tchorka

Wchodzę w utworzoną niedawno przeze mnie kategorię pt. Category:Struggle and Martyrdom commemorative plaques in Warsaw, patrzę... a tu mnóstwo zdjęć :) . Duża praca przy kategoryzacji, gratuluję :) . I pozdrawiam! TR (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

O, fajnie. Ja też lubię jeździć po Warszawie na rowerku i foty robić, ale czasu ostatnio mniej... Z tego, co się orientuję, to była robiona inwentaryzacja tablic (których jest ok. 200) przez osobę pozostającą w kontakcie z Fundacją Tchorek - Bentall. Postaram się potwierdzić te informacje, co pewnie pozwoli nam na dotarcie do spisu :) . A jak Cię tego rodzaju sprawy interesują, to podsyłam także ten oto link - na wystawie jest sporo informacji o rzeźbiarzach (w tym Tchorku właśnie), których dzieła mijamy codziennie w całej Warszawie. Pozdrawiam serdecznie. TR (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Znalazłem kolejną fotografię, co sugeruje, że nieskategoryzowanych może jeszcze troszkę być. Zapytałem o to Alę Z. W międzyczasie natknąłem się na... taką o to listę :) . Ale tak jak wspominałem - słyszałem, że był robiony fachowy projekt dotyczący inwentaryzacji tablic, odezwę się w tej sprawie jeszcze. Nie zdziwię się, jak okaże się, że w Wiki tych zdjęć jest więcej niż się spodziewaliśmy :) . TR (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

OK, wiem już, że z pewnością istnieje lista tablic (był projekt Fundacji Tchorek - Bentall), ale nie jest ona jeszcze nigdzie opublikowana. Być może uda mi się jednak do niej dotrzeć :) . W takim wypadku oczywiście dam znać. Pozdrowienia! TR (talk) 21:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

File:POL Krościenko nD - Good Shepherd Church - Sacristy.JPG

Hej. Jesteś pewien, że ta fotka przedstawia zakrystię? Bo na moje oko wygląda to na plebanię. ;) -- CLI (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

No to fajnie. ;) Zmieniłem przy okazji nazwę pliku na File:POL Krościenko nD - Good Shepherd Church - Rectory.JPG. -- Pozdrawiam, CLI (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Kategoryzacja zybytkow i szablony

Witam. Jeżeli został wstawiony szablon zabytek to nie potrzebna jest już wpisywana manualnie kategoria "Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Szczawnica". Wpis ten załatwia szablon zabytek z automatu. Dla zabytków w mieście Szczawnicy proszę używać szablonu z zakończeniem "|Szczawnica" dla zabytków gminie tzn. poza granicami miasta szablonu z zakończeniem "|gmina Szczawnica" pozdr. 80.171.17.179 06:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:1999 Skipass Val D'Isere.JPG

And also:

• File:2000 Skipass Val Thorens.JPG
• File:2003 Skipass Val Thorens.JPG
• File:2010 Skipass Dolomiti.JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Deminet Jaroslaw.jpg

File:Deminet Jaroslaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcgalrespons 23:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Znak honorowy SZRP miniature draftee.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Znak honorowy SZRP miniature draftee.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Znak honorowy SZRP miniature regular.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Znak honorowy SZRP miniature regular.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Znak honorowy SZRP.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Znak honorowy SZRP.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

File:AGAD 1. 69.II.VII.04.png

File:AGAD 1. 69.II.VII.04.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Martin H. (talk) 17:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

File:POL Warsaw Memoriał Wolnego Słowa 8.JPG

File:POL Warsaw Memoriał Wolnego Słowa 8.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 00:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Andrzej Lam 2015.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Andrzej Lam 2015.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Kwestia kategorii Media contributed by AGAD presented in former polska.pl portal‎

Skany z kategorii Media contributed by AGAD presented in former polska.pl nie pochodzą ze zbiorów Archiwum Głównego Akt Dawnych i nie powinny być przypisywane do kategorii Documents from Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych, ponadto sama nazwa kategorii jest błędna. Będę próbował zrobić z tym porządek i proszę więcej nie podpinać kategorii kategorii Media contributed by AGAD presented in former polska.pl portal‎ pod Documents from Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych.

User:Lukasz Truscinski OK, ten projekt został przeze mnie zakończony. Wszystkie te media otrzymałem na nośnikach od dyrektora AGAD jako pochodzące z wcześniej eksponowanych na stronach polska.pl. Pozdrawiam, Happa (talk) 08:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Happa Musiało dojść do jakiegoś nieporozumienia. Faktycznie one były na polska.pl, ale niestety nie wszystkie pochodzą z AGAD. Pracownicy innych archiwów mogliby poczuć do AGAD żal za takie "przywłaszczanie" sobie często najcenniejszych materiałów z ich zbiorów. Doszło tu do pewnego zamieszania i wydaje mi się, że należałoby przede wszystkim zacząć od zmienienia nazwy na Media presented in former polska.pl portal. Nadal jednak nie jestem pewien, co na to by powiedzieli dyrektorzy innych archiwów, z których większość nie podpisywała porozumień z Fundacją Wikimedia.

Zdjęcie Jana Świderskiego

Szanowny Panie, reprezentuje Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu warszawskiego i chciałabym się z Panem skontaktować w związku z poszukiwaniem praw do zdjęcia Jana Świderskiego. Będę wdzięczna za szybką odpowiedź. Karolina Chmielewska

Ale jak mam odpisać, jak nie ma adresu? Spróbuję na IP. Pozdrawiam, Happa (talk) 09:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Najmocniej przepraszam, mój adres mailowy: karolina.maria.chmielewska@student.uw.edu.pl. Jak skontaktuje się Pan ze mną, to mailowo podam więcej szczegółów. Pozdrawiam, Karolina Chmielewska.

Copyright status: File:Wykus 1943-09-12 Tadeusz Rylski 15.tif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wykus 1943-09-12 Tadeusz Rylski 15.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Wykus 1943-09-12 Tadeusz Rylski 4.tif

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Epitafium Jana Rataja.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Epitafium Jana Rataja.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stang 18:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

I have made the necessary modifications to the file page.Thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons.--Stang 03:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

File:AGAD Liberman Herman list gończy zdjęcie.png

Nie dawaj przy nieznanym autorze {{PD-old}}: to jest pierwszy krok do automatycznego usunięcia zdjęcia. {{Anonymous-EU}} lub {{PD-Polishsymbol}} byłyby duż lepsze w tym wypadku (to ostatnie przy założeniu, że list gończy był dokumentem urzędowym). Ankry (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, dziękuję, będę pamiętał, Happa (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

File:AGAD Mapa rzeki Odry z przylegającymi użytkami rolnymi oraz planem miasta Wrocławia.jpg

Sorry for writing in english, but my polnish is just to underdeveloped to express myself in that fine language. So I also can't really understand the long commentary by Dariusz Bednarek which accomanies that article.

I have a question on the original source. It looks like this scan is a cutout of a larger map -- File:AGAD Mapa rzeki Odry z przylegającymi użytkami rolnymi oraz planem miasta Wrocławia - full.png, but even that is a cutout from a larger map. At least in that "full" version one sees the scale in the lower left corner. But further outside must be some indication of the author of the map. Could you please clarify? Thanks in advance. --L.Willms (talk) 10:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Malinkiewicz Olga.JPG

File:Malinkiewicz Olga.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kocio (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Kozlowski Julian.jpg

File:Kozlowski Julian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Krzymowski Stanislaw.jpg

File:Krzymowski Stanislaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Wilczewski Michal.jpg

File:Wilczewski Michal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Buslowicz Michal.jpg

File:Buslowicz Michal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Rybka Franciszek.jpg

File:Rybka Franciszek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Kontrym Boleslaw.jpg

File:Kontrym Boleslaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Pentz Karol.jpg

File:Pentz Karol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Romaszkan Roman.jpg

File:Romaszkan Roman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Kuczynski Marian.jpg

File:Kuczynski Marian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Cetys Teodor.jpg

File:Cetys Teodor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Chyliński Eugeniusz.jpg

File:Chyliński Eugeniusz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Jagielski Stanislaw.jpg

File:Jagielski Stanislaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Swiatkowski Andrzej.jpg

File:Swiatkowski Andrzej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Mich Stefan.jpg

File:Mich Stefan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Szydlowski Adam.jpg

File:Szydlowski Adam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Bzdawka Bernard.jpg

File:Bzdawka Bernard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Pukacki Franciszek.jpg

File:Pukacki Franciszek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Walter Wojciech.jpg

File:Walter Wojciech.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Wiszniewski Otton i Ostrowinski Henryk.jpg

File:Wiszniewski Otton i Ostrowinski Henryk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Krasinski Adam.jpg

File:Krasinski Adam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Wiszniewski i Ostrowinski.jpg

File:Wiszniewski i Ostrowinski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:PL Zakopane New Cem Gąsienica-Groń Franciszek 2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PL Zakopane New Cem Gąsienica-Groń Franciszek 2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:PL Zakopane New Cem Gąsienica-Groń Franciszek 2.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

• Przepraszam, ale ty chyba nie jesteś autorem tego zdjęcia. Proszę podaj autora, źródło i ustalmy czy zdjęcie może być objęte wolną licencją. Masur (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@Masur: Dziękuję za uwagę. Jest to zrobione przeze mnie zdjęcie fragmentu nagrobka Gąsienicy-Gronia w Zakopanem, zawierającego jego zdjęcie. Pozdrawiam, Happa (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

• • No to technicznie nie jest to twoje zdjęcie, ale nie chce mi się czepiać. Wolność panoramy owszem, ale nie do tego samego wykorzystania (a tu zdjęcie wykorzystanego jako zdjęcie). Masur (talk) 09:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:AGAD Leszek Czarny wystawia przywilej na lokację na prawie niemieckim Wolborza.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AGAD Leszek Czarny wystawia przywilej na lokację na prawie niemieckim Wolborza.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 21:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

File:AGAD Leszek Czarny wystawia przywilej na lokację na prawie niemieckim Wolborza.jpg

File:AGAD Leszek Czarny wystawia przywilej na lokację na prawie niemieckim Wolborza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Zawadowski Teodor.jpg

File:Zawadowski Teodor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mhhossein ^talk 07:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1958 Jerzy na balkonie (2).jpg

Copyright status: File:1958 Jerzy na balkonie (2).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1958 Jerzy na balkonie (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 11:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:1958 Jerzy na balkonie (2).jpg

File:1958 Jerzy na balkonie (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 07:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:AGAD Gen. Wojciech jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:AGAD Gen. Wojciech jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

File:AGAD Gen. Wojciech jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.png

File:AGAD Gen. Wojciech jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 10:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Jonikas i Sikorski.jpg

File:Jonikas i Sikorski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

• Jeżeli autor jest nieznany, prawa do zdjęcia wygasają 70 lub 95 lat po pierwszej publikacji (chyba, że było opublikowane przed 1989 rokiem). Więc trzeba wskazać datę i miejsce takiej publikacji. Ankry (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Jonikas Mieczysław na szybowcu.jpg

File:Jonikas Mieczysław na szybowcu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:AGAD Gorgonowa case 1.png

File:AGAD Gorgonowa case 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.37.205.142 18:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)