User talk:Ludvig14

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ludvig14!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Heia ludvig! gratulerer med døden!:D

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krutitsy Metochion1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VysokopetrovskyMonastery StPeter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 17:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Ludvig14,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borovsk TransfigurationChurch2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad Samarskaya24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna ChurchRenewalTempleResurrection.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad International95a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Kuskovo DryingHouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Kuskovo Palace5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SPb - Peter's Сurtain and Menshikov Bastion of Peter&Paul Fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! YuP StGeorgeChurch4p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KolomnaKremlin MarinkinaT.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam UpperGarden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam ResurectionSketeRefectory.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam GephsimanskiySketeChurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe SaviourGates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe AscensionChurch tim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe WoodenPalace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchTheotokosIviron Vspolye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klyazma ChurchHolyMandylion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarevo ChurchStNicholas4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenka(Nerl).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

КатегоризацияEdit

Когда ты памятники отправляешь в категорию типа Cultural heritage monuments in Xxx District, ты не могла бы к ним сразу добавлять и географические категории? Например, Xxx District, или по селу (если есть), в городе иногда бывает Buildings in xxx или Churches in xxx. Если они туда не попадут, их потом сложно будет найти.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Ага, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Я думала, опять все неправильно... Кстати, я еще в прошлом году обнаружила (на примере Александрова), что организация категорий типа Здания в XXX - Улицы XXX и до кучи еще и Культурное наследие XXX кажутся мне нелогичными и не понимаю их взаимную иерархию (кто кому подчиняется, а где они должны быть параллельными). И я подозреваю, что то, что я там накатегоризовала, было весьма неудачным решением. Так что, извини, но ошибки будут продолжаться - Ludvig14 (talk) 15:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
В моём понимании это три параллельные линии. То есть в идеале здание, если у него нет своей категории, должно быть категоризовано по улице, по типу (например, церковь) и как памятник культурного наследия. Проблема в том, что сейчас, кроме самых больших городов, так категоризовать не получится. Для культурного наследия категории всюду есть (где нет, я потом пройду и создам). А уже по зданиям в городе не всегда. Так что, действительно, отправлять здание одновременно в категорию Трубчевск и Культурное наследие Трубчевска нелогично, так как вторая включена в первую. Но если дом в категорию Трубчевск при этом не включить, то тот, кто когда-нибудь создаст категорию Здания в Трубчевске, может его просто не найти. Но это всё, в принципе, не смертельно, прошлый год нет смысла перерывать. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Здания и культурное наследие, да, параллельные. Но при большом числе памятников получается огромная категория и твой вариант, когда под каждое здание делается новая категория, мне удобным не кажется, ибо часто лучше видеть все сразу, а не бродить по подкатегориям в поисках нужного объекта (тут, кстати, очень помогают списки памятников). Вместо этого я в Александрове пыталась группировать дома хотя бы по улицам, но быстро поняла, что и это плохой вариант, потому что имеются изображения и рядовых зданий и это ничем не помогает с памятниками. Так там все осталось в неудовлетворительном состоянии и ничего с этим сделать я не смогла. - Ludvig14 (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Нет, я под каждое здание не делаю новую категорию, только когда там много файлов. Но, в общем, да - и так плохо, и так.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Buildings_by_Alexey_ShchusevEdit

Jebulon (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Panoramic views of Peter & Paul FortressEdit

См. вопрос на User_talk:Ymblanter#Петропавловское. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Ludvig14,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurchGremyachaya1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov HodegetriaChurch1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurch sPrimostiya2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MoscowKremlin Senate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MoscowKremlin Armoury2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow StBasilCathedral d28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow StBarbaraChurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow UniversityChurch I38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad GrainFactory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Grand Kremlin Palace3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Views fromCCS C12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Beklemishevskaya Tower V23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow BorovitskayaTower I50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ZachatyevskyConventCathedral C35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChurchAnna'sConceiving inUgol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ViewOfKremlin V45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Views fromCCS C14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow NovayaSquare14 S63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovogorod ChurchInKozhevniki VN180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod DesyatinnyMonBellTower VN06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovogorod WhiteTower VN216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod PhilippAndStNicolasChurch VN109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod ElijahChurch Slavno VN112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovogorod Detinets VN13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Panoramic imagesEdit

Dear Ludvig14, I notice that you recategorise photos from Kraków. Now on commons a panoramic image is not just a nice view, but it actually means a wide angle view (see i.e. ru:Панорама or en:Panorama), beyond what a standard wide angle lense provides.

not a panoramic image

So for instance the photo on the left side typically is not classified as panoramic image. As a guideline, in most cases a single image file from camera does not qualify as a panoramic image.

a panoramic image

The image on the right side however does qualify. It is composed or "stitched" from several individual photos. It does span a wide angle range, about 180 degrees. It has a rather elongated aspect ratio. This is the meaning of panoramic image as is usual on wikimedia commons.

Best regards -- KlausFoehl (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, I know quite well what does the "panorama" mean and I often do this kind of pictures myself. And I quite agree that the name General views of Wawel would be better than Panoramic views of Wawel. But it seems I am not the only one who classifies these general views as panoramas (look, for example, Category:Panoramic views of Kraków). And what do you want me to do? To rename the category "Panoramic views of Wawel"? - Ludvig14 (talk) 20:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for being away from commons for a week. Looking at a number of "Panoramic views of XY" categories, the situation is diffuse. Maybe worth asking at the Village pump. My suggestion would be "Views of XY" with subcategories "Cityscapes of XY" and "Panoramics of XY". But whatever the hierarchy, "Panoramics" should be mostly stitched photos and similar. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure you can change this situation. Sometimes if an author did not specify how he/she produced his/her picture you have no chance to guess it correctly. If you do not believe it, you may try to guess with my pictures on this page. Many of them were really panoramas - Ludvig14 (talk) 09:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod AntonievMon Cathedral VN152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod StsBorisGlebChurchPlotniki VN147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A barnstar for you!Edit

The Photographer's Barnstar
С признательностью за весомый и качественный вклад в проект Викимедиа. Dom kobb (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vysokopetrovsky Monastery ChurchOfOurLadyOfBogolyubovo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Вики любит Землю 2015Edit

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваша фотография:

оказалась среди 435 из более чем 8300 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошла в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2015

Your picture is in an app!Edit

Собор Василия Блаженного
St. Basil's Cathedral

Hello Ludvig14,

Your beautiful picture of St. Basil's Cathedral has been included in the Google Play app Wonders of the World. It has Russian-language support: Чудеса Cвета.

You are credited as "Photo: Ludvig14, [license type], [link to Wikimedia Commons photograph]". If you would like to change the attribution in a future version, please let us know.

Thank you very much for your contribution!

Zeuslab (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe LimeAvenue KE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Фотоснимки из ПереславляEdit

Здравствуйте. Мне хотелось бы обсудить ваши снимки из Переславля, потому что многое в них меня смущает. Может быть, вы полагаете снова приезжать в наш город? Может быть, вы согласитесь объяснить, почему и как были сделаны ваши снимки? Если да, то я спрошу подробнее. Спасибо. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Приезжать, вроде, пока не планировала, а ответить на вопросы готова попробовать. - Ludvig14 (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Далеко не всё мне понятно в вашем выборе времени и позиции.

Композиционные странностиEdit

Снято с теневой стороныEdit

Тяжёлые тениEdit


Пересвечено, хроматические аберрацииEdit

Вот такие сомнения у меня возникли. Пересвет же легко убрать в обработке рав-файлов? Вы приезжали на вручение премии? Или премиальный плакат просто остался на стене? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Вики любит памятники 2015Edit

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

оказались среди 1083 из почти 24 тысяч загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Правки по спискам WLEEdit

Добрый день. Пожалуйста, не отменяйте мои правки по спискам СПб и Ленобласти, не вглядевшись в суть этих правок. Я там создала десяток новых категорий и все "зеленые" шапки Protected Areas перенесла вместе с файлами в эти категории, а служебные категории типа Protected areas of Russia/4710164 остались в этих случаях чисто служебными. Если в них появляются "зеленые" технические шапки, они начинают дублировать уже созданные категории на Викискладе, а это лишнее умножение сущностей. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 12:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Да, это беда. Как я понимаю, все такие "служебные" категории должны были быть переименованы ботом и даже внесены в соответствующий список на переименование. Но Вы не дождались "робота" и стали создавать категории вручную. Хорошо, СПб и область править не буду. - Ludvig14 (talk) 12:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Я дальше Питера и области вообще не планирую заниматься ВЛЕ-списками, природа - совсем не моя епархия)) Но нашу немного знаю, поэтому решила немного повозиться. Вручную создавать категории несложно, общий принцип их наименования мне понятен, английский знаю, поэтому я решила все-таки десяток категорий создать самостоятельно и, соответственно, перетащить в них соответствующие файлы. Мы с Сашей уже немного пообсуждали эту мою работу, он никаких претензий не выказал. А дальше уже пусть бот орудует, конечно.
Кстати, в списке по ссылке присутствуют в качестве планируемых к созданию и те категории, которые были созданы, судя по всему, давным-давно - тот же Приоратский парк, который не только ООПТ, но и ОКН. Как посоветуете, их стоит убрать из списка по ссылке? Я могу, если надо, потому что прекрасно помню, какие категории уже созданы, да и в списках их очень быстро найду, чтоб свериться, поскольку занималась всем этим буквально на днях. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Наверное, лучше убрать. Я тоже уже об этом задумалась. - Ludvig14 (talk) 13:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
ОК, я тогда вотпрямщас схожу и уберу, чтобы не отсвечивало, да и чтоб не забыть. Оставлю только те, где Вики-категорий нет и не было.
И еще кстати: Питерские (78 регион то есть) ВЛЕ-категории все были до меня приведены в порядок, но я в сам список (опять же по сонгласованию с Сашей и с опорой на источники) добавила штук 15 новых объектов. Там служебные категории будут все пустые, да и Вики-категорий пока нет, само собой, как минимум до мая. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Ага, спасибо! - Ludvig14 (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Фото по Царь-пушке Московского КремляEdit

Уважаемый Людвиг, добрый вечер!

Нет ли у Вас случаем хорошего фото Царь-пушки Московского Кремля, такое, как Ваше фото Архангельского собора? К сожалению, оно у меня не получилось из-за всё время крутящихся вокруг неё интуристов. Есть ли что-либо по фактуре и

плотности? В Кремле буду, но больше снимать ничего не буду.

P.S. Мне очень нравятся Ваши фото, стараюсь везде их ставить, где могу.

С уважением и наилучшими пожеланиями в Новом 2016 Году

C.caramba2010 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо на добром слове. Царь-пушка есть и давно загружена на викисклад (File:MoscowKremlin TsarCannon.JPG), впрочем, она мне не очень удалась - Ludvig14 (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Поставил Вашу Царь-пушку с Вашего разрешения на страницу Московский Кремль. Если будет возможность сфотографировать её весной, чтобы дополнить коллекцию, будьте любезны, сделайте это. Ваш Архангельский собор там уже стоит, не мог его сфотографировать, поскольку всё время со всех сторон бил в объектив солнечный свет. Заранее благодарен Вашими трудами.

С уважением и наилучшими пожеланиями

потомок древних русских дворянских родов (в т.ч. Воробьёвых - Ваши любимые Воробьёвы горы!) C.caramba2010 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

    • Людвиг, мало того, написал о своём видении фото Московского Кремля:

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Обсуждение:Московский_Кремль#.D0.9F.D0.BE_.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.BE.D0.B4.D1.83_.D1.84.D0.BE.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.B3.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.84.D0.B8.D0.B9


      • Вопрос второй. Сейчас верстаю книгу и мне нужны иллюстрации. Ваши иллюстрации мне очень подходят. Могу ли с Вашего разрешения использовать в книге нужные мне иллюстрации с Википедии и что для этого нужно? Если я буду писать, что все фото Людвига14, не будет ли это являться нарушением Вашего авторского права? Если Вам неудобно писать здесь, напишите мне в личку. C.caramba2010 (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Думаю, что использовать иллюстрации Вы можете без каких-либо ограничений, но на всякий случай надо еще посмотреть текст лицензии, под которой фотографии выложены на Commons (я не люблю читать такие тексты, но попробую продраться), тогда станет понятнее, что можно, а что нельзя. Что касается авторства - я подумаю еще денек. Меня не смущает и Ludvig14 (но именно латиницей), но, может быть, самое время "выйти из подполья". - Ludvig14 (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Вроде, текст лицензии (можете почитать эту или подобные) позволяет использовать файлы без ограничений. Авторство надо указывать, но ник вполне допустим. Как я понимаю, мое разрешение никому не нужно, раз файлы были загружены под такой лицензией. - Ludvig14 (talk) 18:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо. C.caramba2010 (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Parks in KrasnodarEdit

Do not put files in a redirected category, please. Nobody can see them there. Best regards, Wieralee (talk) 01:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Не помещать файлы в категорию перенаправлением, пожалуйста. Никто не может видеть их там. С уважением, Wieralee (talk) 01:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately I do not quite understand how to organize right using of Template:Category Russia in this particular case. Please, give us time to untangle this problem and do not correct park categories for the time being. Thank you. - Ludvig14 (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerusalem DomeoftheRock J65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerusalem DomeoftheRock J63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl GoritskyMon Cathedral P92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Ludvig14,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016Edit

Hello Ludvig14,

In 2014 you participated in the photo contest Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. We organise this photo contest too in 2016.

We also organise 4 photo tours in Ghent, Mechelen, Antwerp and Liège. See: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016

We hope to see your photos of monuments! Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon PresentationChurch 1488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon NWTower 1563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon SETower 1580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon StSergiusChurch R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Ludvig14".