File:الفهرست.djvu

 
File:الفهرست.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:James Eagan Homes.jpg

 
File:James Eagan Homes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: non free press image
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Wvdp (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:علی دیزایی و همسرش شهامه دیزایی.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:علی دیزایی و همسرش شهامه دیزایی.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:علی دیزایی و همسرش شهامه دیزایی.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

File:David Duke em 1978.jpg

 
File:David Duke em 1978.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source link says image is taken by Associated Press: [1]. I highly doubt the Associated Press would not put a copyright notice on their images. If they have not put a copyright notice, we need more evidence (such as showing the front and back side of the photo itself).
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

FunnyMath (talk) 00:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

File:David Duke em 1978.jpg

 
File:David Duke em 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Higher res image

Hello, Remitamine. Thank you for uploading higher resolution files of some images I uploaded. I wonder how you get a higher resolution from for example File:W.J. Dewez.jpg? Be glad to hear, greeting, Eissink (talk) 15:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC).

just remove the width(w) query parameter from the download URL to get the higher resolution image, for your example, change the URL:
https://www.delpher.nl/nl/api/downloadimage?id=MMKB26:001042002:00052:image&w=1024
to:
https://www.delpher.nl/nl/api/downloadimage?id=MMKB26:001042002:00052:image Remitamine (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Brilliant, I never thought about that. Thank you! Eissink (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC).

I also want to express thanks for finding higher resolution copies of all these images, but I have to ask that you please document on the description page where they were obtained. Even for free-licensed works, it's important to show their source in case a question ever arose. Thank you. Huntster (t @ c) 12:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

in most cases i'm extracting the higher resolution image from the same source, if the source is different than i try to update the file information with the new source URL(ex: [2] [3] ...).Remitamine (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! What caught my attention was File:EcoDemonstrator on tarmac.jpg on my watchlist and (briefly checking) File:Coche nagoya con aire en la linea c.jpg, where neither replacement source was at all apparent. Huntster (t @ c) 14:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Dushanbe Post Office, 1937.jpg

 
File:Dushanbe Post Office, 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

You uploaded a higher resolution version of this file but you did not provide any source. Where did you get it? Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

from the same source(British Film Institute website). Remitamine (talk) 21:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
I can't find or see any higher resolution versions. What is the full url of the image you uploaded? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I prefer to keep the method to extract the Full Resolution private, i did check other images uploaded from the same website and applied the method as needed(ex: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DoctorJekyllandMis1920.jpg , https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ingrid_Bergman_with_her_father_1921.jpg , ...).

File:Download-1.jpg

 
File:Download-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: All contents © copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Alexandrina-petrescu-mama-elena-ceausescu.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alexandrina-petrescu-mama-elena-ceausescu.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alexandrina-petrescu-mama-elena-ceausescu.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Steve Marino render.jpg

 
File:Steve Marino render.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source website quoted carries copyright tag: © 2020 PARS International Corp. All rights reserved.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Crep171166 (talk) 21:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I just wanted to thank you for your work in sourcing and uploading higher resolution images (e.g the above image). Storye book (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Epa kim jong un kb 140422 16x9 992.jpg

 
File:Epa kim jong un kb 140422 16x9 992.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: As the author is unknown and the source is ABC News, I think it is safe assume that these are copyrighted
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Headlock0225 (talk) 11:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

File:KDB Seteria (P-04).jpg was recently deleted

File:KDB Seteria (P-04).jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 6 October 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hay-mar-nay-win.png

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hay-mar-nay-win.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hay-mar-nay-win.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

NinjaStrikers «» 09:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

File:6055607 4b5a0920 1000x625.jpg

 
File:6055607 4b5a0920 1000x625.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Gbawden (talk) 18:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Big-data-social-media 0.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Big-data-social-media 0.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Big-data-social-media 0.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LMLM (talk) 18:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Mao's portrait and surveillance cameras at Tiananmen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gusama Romero </talk> 07:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Pichi campana nets.jpg

 
File:Pichi campana nets.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

File:PauloDybala.webp

 
File:PauloDybala.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No indication of publication under a free license at source
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

4nn1l2 (talk) 21:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg

 
File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Gusama Romero </talk> 21:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

File:AliceOsman.jpg

 
File:AliceOsman.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © Times Newspapers Limited 2020.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Smooth O (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Protest at Guatemalan National Congress building, 21 November 2020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: AP Photo/Oliver De Ros
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif answers questions after a meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono, May 16, 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Animalparty (talk) 19:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Dead fish in a breeding pond at the Maninjau Lake in Agam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: metadata includes "© Antara Photo Agency / Reuters"
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:The dead farmed fish floating in Lake Maninjau 2016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: metadata includes "© Antara Photo Agency / Reuters"
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:People in Baku celebrate on the streets after Azerbaijan's President Aliyev said the country's forces had liberated Shusha during the fighting over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Rescue teams work at a site hit by a rocket during fighting over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in the city of Ganja, Azerbaijan, early Oct. 17, 2020.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Julesrimet rauljude 1950.jpg

 
File:Julesrimet rauljude 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nanahuatl (talk) 08:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jaber al-Ahmed Al-Sabah with George H.W. Bush.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jaber al-Ahmed Al-Sabah with George H.W. Bush.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jaber al-Ahmed Al-Sabah with George H.W. Bush.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 14:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nemonte Nenquimo.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nemonte Nenquimo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nemonte Nenquimo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Funcrunch (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Remitamine. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Funcrunch (talk) 19:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:FlorenceIreneLittleAbertilleryJuly1921a.jpg

The image you superseded in November was better for this image. The fact it displayed the subject in full as opposed to a cropped version, speaks great volumes. Can you please ensure the replacement template does not either skew the subject or leave a blank palette to the image. Hope you don't think I am being pedantic, it is just that the image you replaced this with was better, but left a white rectangle to the visual right of the image. I thought about superseding it, but thought I would contact you first. Best regards, and thanks. Kieron.--Kieronoldham (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

The image that i uploaded reflects the current image accessed from the source URL[4], generally i prefer to upload the original image without any modification especially when the image is not marked with retouched template and let the original uploader decide which one to keep or modify the one i uploaded, anyway, you can use the image that i did upload as a base or even better use the Sun version[5] if it's license is suitable for Commons or keep the current version.Remitamine (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 
File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Jonathan Holloway.jpg

 
File:Jonathan Holloway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Innisfree987 (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1978-043-02, Focke-Wulf Fw 200 C Condor without text.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Isidro Romero Carbo.jpg

 
File:Isidro Romero Carbo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © 2021 C.A. EL UNIVERSO. Todos los derechos reservados.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yilku1 (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Higher quality image

Hello Remitamine  . Thank you for all the improvement you made about images I uploaded from VOA. I noticed that your are able to find higher quality images and with broader frame. But what is your secret please ? I don't unterstand. Guillaume70 (talk) 21:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

i'm sorry, but i prefer to keep the method private, especially that it affect multiple websites.Remitamine (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Jeddah tv tower.jpg

 
File:Jeddah tv tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Käthe Dorsch.jpg

 
File:Käthe Dorsch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mutter Erde (talk) 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

File:K-Luxuriant 2020.jpg

 
File:K-Luxuriant 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Minoraxtalk 09:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Longhorn by Frances C. Fairman.jpg

Hi. Please could you kindly have a look at the above too-small image file, and see whether you can find a larger version anywhere? It is a beautiful picture, and I would like to add a better version to the artist's article on en.wikipedia. Thank you for the good work you have already done on some of my uploads. Storye book (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@Storye book: if you use http://www.nationaltrustcollections.org.uk/LargeImageHandler.ashx?id=8257164 you should be able to get a slighly better quality.Remitamine (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I have clicked on the link but I just get a blank window. I shall leave it up for half an hour in case it's a slow-loader. I'll let you know if I get anything. Storye book (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Update. Wow - it eventually worked, though it took a while for the link to load up. Yes, it does give an image which is only slightly bigger, but I am grateful for that. Thank you so much. Storye book (talk) 11:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Marjan SheikholeslamiAleagha(2).webp

 
File:Marjan SheikholeslamiAleagha(2).webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not an original work by VOA. combination of multiple copyrighted photos.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hanooz 19:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Joint media release Hastie Paterson November 15 2019.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Joint media release Hastie Paterson November 15 2019.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Joint media release Hastie Paterson November 15 2019.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Peggy Cummins (1950).jpg

 
File:Peggy Cummins (1950).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

Taivo (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I try to my best to check if the file is actually a copyrighted image, and if so i try to report them(if an admin can check deleted files History he would be able to find many CopyVio that i did report related to AP, Reuters and AFP), but as i said before, if i'm mistaken about the image, i should not be the one blamed for copyright violation it's the orginal uploader, i'm only improving on images uploaded by other people, is there a proof suggesting that i'm uploading copyrighted images while i know that they are a CopyVio? is there a proof that i'm acting in a bad faith?Remitamine (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue -- Neither are on offer here. Per COM:EVID, burden is on you and is your responsibility to figure out and to verify whether or not a work is freely licensed or in the public domain prior to uploading. A copyright violation on Commons is when a file's status does not comply with Commons' licensing policy. Unless it is explicitly freely licensed or clearly in the public domain, assume that all works that you find elsewhere is copyrighted. Your request to be unlocked is declined. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

After talking to you on IRC and reviewing some of your recent uploads, I'm not inclined to accept this unblock request. You need to take responsibility for your own actions, not blame your decisions on other people. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
@AntiCompositeNumber: i have no problem in taking responsibility for my errors, but not in taking responsibility for other people's errors, as an example: if someone gave me a stolen food and i ate from it not knowing that it's stolen, I'm not to be blamed for stealing the food in the first place.
as i said when i did upload the now disputed images, i didn't upload them knowing that they are copyrighted, and as a proof that i'm trying to check the images after the getting first warning, you can look at the examples from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_89#User:Remitamine, and if you can search in the deleted files that i have made edits in you would find multiple examples(i'm always label them as "CopyVio" in Edit summary).

@Nat: I was improving on a lot of images until i got my first warning[6], after that i did explain to the admin that I'm uploading from the same source [7], and after some suggestions in the IRC channel, i did collect the information about all my edits for VOA News and i did run through them and reported the images that are considered to be copyvio, shortly after that there was a second complain [8][9] even thought there wasn't any copyvio reported of images uploaded after the first warning, and from there going on until now i did slow down trying to reduce my errors and in the way i was reporting copyvio images if i detect them, but even though i did made an effort in the direction suggested by the admins, it's still considered not enough, a single error after getting the warning would trigger a block.

None of the images that I've uploaded are new, they where already uploaded by other people, i merely improved on them using the same source that the original uploader stated.

I'm here for single purpose, to do what i can do the best, improving on images(Removing Watermark, adding Original EXIF metadata, improving image resolution, etc...) uploaded by others using the same source, where there are lots of images that are uploaded in a low quality, but instead I'm asked here to do the work of a license reviewer which I'm not good at.Remitamine (talk) 17:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Yusif Baghirzadeh.jpg

 
File:Yusif Baghirzadeh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Isgandar Hamidov.jpg

 
File:Isgandar Hamidov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Эльвин Мирзоев.jpg

 
File:Эльвин Мирзоев.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 
File:Mikhail Vistitskiy (Михаил Вистицкий) SvobodaNews.ru (RFERL).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

And also:

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Voa chinese Yang Jing 14May2017.jpg

 
File:Voa chinese Yang Jing 14May2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Elon-Musk Forbes.jpg

 
File:Elon-Musk Forbes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: AP Photo, no credible claim of license
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

B (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

File:UnalCevikoz.jpg

 
File:UnalCevikoz.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Just because it's posted on VOA doesn't mean VOA is the author. The description credits an AP photogapher.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

B (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

File:File 02.jpg

 
File:File 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This is an AP photo downloaded from forbes.com. No credible claim of license.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

B (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Prezident Ilhom Aliyev Xudaferin ko'prigida bayroqni ko'targan.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prezident Ilhom Aliyev Xudaferin ko'prigida bayroqni ko'targan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prezident Ilhom Aliyev Xudaferin ko'prigida bayroqni ko'targan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 
File:Village sénégalais. Les Plongeurs, Exposition internationale d’Amiens, carte postale, 1906.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Comandante (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Evgeny Buryakov.png

 
File:Evgeny Buryakov.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.123.231.41 11:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

File:3rd Prime Minister of Malaysia Tun Hussein Onn.jpg

 
File:3rd Prime Minister of Malaysia Tun Hussein Onn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Cahangir Kazımbəyli.jpg

#invoke:Autotranslate Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Антон Понкрашов.png

Template:Autotranslate El Funcionario (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hi there! Thanks for uploading pictures that have higher resolution than mines. How do you find them from VoA? --Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 19:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

[10]Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Serge Dal Busco 2013.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Sherwood6 ([[User talk:Sherwood6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

File:François Longchamp.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Sherwood6 ([[User talk:Sherwood6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, GRuban ([[User talk:GRuban|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Lasse poysti.jpg

Template:Autotranslate 88.131.3.207 13:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --ghouston ([[User talk:Ghouston|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Asəf Zeynallı.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Dr.Wiki54 ([[User talk:Dr.Wiki54|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Melanie Ott.jpg

Template:Autotranslate --Animalparty ([[User talk:Animalparty|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Talk page issues

Hello. There appears to be errors on your User talk page that prevent some templates from displaying correctly. This problem might be solved by archiving your talk page (which also avoids cluttering your active page with dozens of older threads). For more information see Category:User talk pages where template include size is exceeded (which includes your talk page). If you have additional issues or questions please ask at Commons:Help desk. Cheers! --Animalparty ([[User talk:Animalparty|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

  The Historical Media Barnstar
Thank you for your recent efforts in uploading larger-sized image files for out-of-copyright historical images. Your hard work is much appreciated. Power to you! Storye book ([[User talk:Storye book|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Fossil-AvimaiaSchweitzerae-EggShell.png

The fix for phab:T286273 was backported early this morning, so I have reverted File:Fossil-AvimaiaSchweitzerae-EggShell.png to your version. The PNG metadata parser shouldn't be quite so fragile now, so you should be fine to continue overwriting PNGs. AntiCompositeNumber ([[User talk:AntiCompositeNumber|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Unwanted Exif Metadata overwrites

What is "Exif Metadata" ? This does not describe the changes made. It seems files that have more than one version, you have uploaded a worse quality version, such as File:Tongtianlong-5.jpg and File:Buddha 1910.jpg.--BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:37, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

the images that i did upload are in the same highest resolution presented from nature.com, so the last previous version cannot be intact non upscalled or artificially enhanced images from nature.com website.
for your example File:Tongtianlong-5.jpg, the image that i did upload has the Exif metadata that contain the dates and the tools that has been used to create the image, and also has the correct colors.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please, say where have you downloaded high resolution version of this file?— Redboston 17:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

From the same source.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Can you give me the direct link?— Redboston 23:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I prefer to keep the method to extract the Full Resolution private, i did check other images uploaded from the same website and applied the method as needed(ex: File:Gumrak_Airport_012.jpg , File:Board_of_the_Committee_of_Culture_of_the_Volgograd_Region_2016.jpg , ...).Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Ok. But we have a problem which descripted here: ru:Википедия:Рецензирование/Площадь Павших Борцов. In short. Low resolution version have been downloaded from volgograd.ru, we can check it including via direct link. http://www.volgograd.ru is licensed CC-BY-4.0 International (excluding materials the copyright of which belongs to third parties). And low-res version don't have any attribution — both on the page with the photo and in the metadata of the file. But the metadata of the high-res file contains such information: author Oleg Dimitrov; copyright http://volfoto.ru. I think this clearly indicates that volgograd.ru haven't the copyright for this high resolution version.— Redboston 11:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
The low resolution version is derived on the server from the higher resolution version that i did upload, and it's metadata has been striped away, you can determine that by the checking the Exif comment tag that has the content "CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 95." which means that the low resolution version has been generated using the GD Graphics Library, so if the higher resolution version does not fit in Wikimedia Commons then the same applies the low resolution version.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm not very good at technical details... Are you saying that the low-res version is generated from the high-res version automatically? If so, then we really need to delete both versions. The low-res file could have been manually uploaded to the site?— Redboston 13:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
yes, the low res image has been automatically generated, the website is managed by a Content Management System and there is an indication that the low quality version has been resized to fit in a 900x600 dimension.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
yes, i can, checking some of the images posted there, they have similar Exif Metadata values for the image ownership(all except the first image that show few persons, fountain and part of building), the "Creator" tag has the value "Oleg Dimitrov" and the "Copyright" tag has the value "http://volfoto.ru".Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
So what does the first photo's exif say? --XVodolazx ([[User talk:XVodolazx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
for the first image, the "Creator" is "Lobakin_Dim +79377502021" and the "Copyright" is "Press Admin Volg obl".Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Very interesting, thank you! --XVodolazx ([[User talk:XVodolazx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Edward Bernays and Doris E. Fleischman.jpg

Template:Autotranslate — Racconish💬 09:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 21:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Faktengebunden ([[User talk:Faktengebunden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Vincent Eyre, Portraits of the Cabla Prisoners 1.jpg

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Andrew Tahmooressi Mugshot.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 16:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

About Sogdiantextile

Hi there, about your flagging of File:Sogdiantextile.jpg. That is a 2-dimensional object's scan of a 5th-century textile, the copyright is of the 5th-century Sogdian artist. Or isn't it?--Haldir Marchwarden ([[User talk:Haldir Marchwarden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

you're claiming that the image has been released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International but there is no indication that the image has been released under this license(base on the guardian article that you have cited as the source of the image).

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate mattbr 10:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Fahad Yasin.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Mikehawk10 ([[User talk:Mikehawk10|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Ok-lars-nordahl-direktoer-gaeldsstyrelsen-skat-1.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Ruff tuff cream puff ([[User talk:Ruff tuff cream puff|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 ([[User talk:廣九直通車|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Resizing of picture

Hello Remitamine!

I stumbled today upon this file I had previously uploaded from VOA : File:Christian Roger Okemba - 2019.jpg.

I see that you changed it to remove the watermark, which is fine by me. But I noticed that the picture itself has become far smaller that the original picture I uploaded (see original and new picture). So much that the cropping I did of this politician's face wouldn't be possible anymore (too small). Why is that?

I see that the new version you uploaded is also wider than the original. Isn't there a possibility to upload the HD version of this wider picture please? --Titlutin ([[User talk:Titlutin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The Image that i did upload is in the original resolution present on VOA server, the image that you did upload has been upscaled by the VOA server.
BTW, another higher res version of the same images is present on [11] but I'm not sure about it's license.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Sorry for the late answer. And thank you for those links. Indeed, I see that this politician is speaking in a "VOX" microphone, so there's a high chance this is in fact a VOX pic, not owned by VOA. Plus, the VOX article was published in 2018, when the legend in the VOA article said the pic was taken in 2019. I think I'm going to start a "deletion request". --Titlutin ([[User talk:Titlutin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Christian Roger Okemba - 2019.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Titlutin ([[User talk:Titlutin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Moranbong Band.jpg

Template:Autotranslate – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 18:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Portrait of a Young Man, 1853 by Richard Dadd.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Unclevinny ([[User talk:Unclevinny|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Ola Brown.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Victuallers ([[User talk:Victuallers|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Mitte27 ([[User talk:Mitte27|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Please note that here you've replaced old version (before 2014 restoration, as is it in the filename) with new restored version of painting. The old version is without the whale on the shore, the new one - with the whale (full story here[12]). Please don't do such things again and read the descrition: we have here a lot of files "before restoration", "with frame", "old photo" etc. All of them are important. If you wants to upload bigger version, do it as the new file, don't replace. --Shakko ([[User talk:Shakko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

the error happened because the image present on source URL stated on the file description is different from the one uploaded in Commons, so i think the source URL should be updated because it's currently misleading. Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Remitamine/Archive 1".