Warburg

Nessie

Image:Nessie ill artlibre jn.jpg was deleted because it had no source by User:Anna, see [1]. If you have information which could get it restored, please contact her! --Ranveig 23:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Spes or Hope.jpg

"No angel but an Allegory". Of course Warburg, thank you. Yellow Lion 21:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:IMG 5390 - Milano - San Sebastiano - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 17 febr. 2007.jpg

Hallo, a "cupola" IS a "Dome". So you are adding the same category twice. The rule is that every category should be listed only once, in English. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto 12:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Hallo, before writing you I had checked, since English is not my tongue. So at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dome I read: "Domes that have been disproportionately influential in later architecture are those of the Great Stupa in Sanchi (actually, a solid mound with stone facing), the Pantheon in Rome, Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem."

It looks like the cupola is a part of the dome: I quote from the same entry "Domes" from Wikipedia in English: "Many domes are topped by a lantern, a structure with openings (or windows) to admit light in the cupola."

The definition this entry gives is: "A cupola is a dome-shaped ornamental structure located on top of a larger roof or dome, often used as a lookout or to admit light and provide ventilation. The word comes, through Italian, from the lower Latin cupula (classical Latin cupella from the Greek kupellon), small cup, indicating a vault resembling an upside-down cup."

We should perhaps ask English-speaking people to decide? --User:G.dallorto 17:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Done: Commons:Village_pump#English_native_speaker_needed. Let's see what they will answer us. :-) --User:G.dallorto 18:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:George_Brecht_-_Void_Stone_03_-_Foto_Unbekannt.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello Siebraund,

The picture is my first try, to show fotos in commons. The picture has been taken by my friend Georg Weichert. He is agreeable that everybody might use his foto. I'm not aware, what kind of fault or error I've made. Could you tell me, because I want to send more (and better) fotos to commons. Thank your very much. Warburg.

Re: Category:Renaissance reliefs in Venice

Thank you for adding the category Category:Renaissance in Italy to Category:Renaissance reliefs in Venice. However, Category:Renaissance reliefs in Venice is a sub-category of Category:Renaissance sculptures in Venice, which is a sub-category of Category:Renaissance sculptures in Italy, which is a sub-category of Category:Renaissance art in Italy, which in its turn is a sub-category of Category:Renaissance in Italy. Therefore, before adding a new category, check whether you are creating an overcategorisation by putting the same page twice in the same category. Thank you. --User:G.dallorto 17:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Category:Drawings by Leonardo da Vinci

This category should contain only drawings which have been made by Leonardo as separate entities, not parts of scientific studies, designs preparing Leonardo's work on pictures/sculptures or design drawings.--Czarnoglowa 17:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

20th Century sculptures

Hello Warburg, I notice that you introduced a new categorie: 20th Century sculpture (s). Since April 2007 I worked hard to start Category: Modern sculptures and Category: Modern sculptors as the period in which the works are created is not exactly the 20th Century. In the first month I had to empty Category : Contemporary sculpture as well and all related categories (such as Sculpture Parks and Gardens) are now in a healthy condition. Luckily I detected in such an early state that you are trying to reinstate such categories again. Believe me, 20th Century and Contemporary, is sometimes correct but overall (and I talk about the vast majority of the modern sculptors) Modern sculpture is indeed a better Category. The period "Modern" starts roughly in the nineteentwenties and still goes on in the 21st Century. I hope you can appreciate my corrections and am always willing to talk about this subject.--Gerardus 15:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Modern sculptures

Hi, Warburg I suppose you read my message on 20th Century Sculptures. I saw to-day your activities of August 3 in the Category:Modern sculptures. Let me explain the purpose of this Category: give every artist mentioned in Category:Modern sculptors one or two images as an example of his work. If you link all images by modern sculptors to this Category soon there are so many images you loose control and nobody can find what he is looking for. The main purpose of Category:Modern sculptors is to store as many free images as possible by name of the sculptor. New sculptors not listed yet and new images not uploaded yet are more than welcome in this category and that alone is an enormous task. So please help me in finding new images in countries with "freedom of panorama" as Germany, The Netherlands, Scandinavia, Great Britain and Ireland and so on (or make the images yourself). Greetings--Gerardus 14:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Gerardus, thanks for the message. I'll stop poaching in your forrest! .-)

Image:Bad_Ems_Park.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 11:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:Bad Ems Kursaal.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bad Ems Kursaal.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 11:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bad_Ems_Brunnen_01.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 11:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Bad_Ems_Brunnen_02.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 11:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

[2] Categories

I think a better choice would have been to add Category:Fire engines of Italy as a subcategory of Category:Firefighting in Italy. --Jollyroger 12:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Now it's ok. Bye, --Filnik 19:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Schifanoia_003.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 14:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Schifanoia_001..JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 14:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Schifanoia.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 14:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Palazzi_Loredan_Farsett.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 18:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:KO Niederwerth.03.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KO Niederwerth.03.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Uhm, das Problem war nur, dass die Bilde keine Erlaubnis (License) hatte! (aber jetzt es ist OK :-)). Tschüss, --Filnik 15:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Warburgs gallery

I change name of Warburgs gallery to User:Warburg/Warburgs gallery because it is your own personal gallery page that lists your favourite pictures at Commons. Therefore it should be a user subpage instead of in the main article namespace. Thanks. Zzyzx11 09:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey,

you do not need to put the same license tag three times on one Image. Best regards, ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 14:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Jesse

Why did you move icon of Jesse to Isaiah category??? It should be in Jesse category. I put it back. Dont move it please. It is Jesse, father of David and ancestor of Jesus, on the icon and not Isaiah. It says Иессей (Jesse) in Russian on top right of icon. There is another different icon of Iasaih (Исайя in russian, it is not the same if you thought so) that I just uploaded and put it in Isaiah category. Kind regrads, --Roman Zacharij 09:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

This is a person and not a tree. In a tree of Jesse there are images of genealogical trees, in category Jesse there are image of person Jesse. But it does not matter now...it has been corrected, problem solved...never mind...keep working:) --Roman Zacharij 13:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Schwetzingen Skulpturen.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lempicka_poster.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Lempicka_poster.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 22:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cary Grant, EDA Milano.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Cary Grant, EDA Milano.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--User:G.dallorto 16:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Do what you think you must do. ;-) Warburg

Image:Psst.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Psst.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Polarlys 15:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Doge

It's ok. I just made a few retouches. In case you needed it, an image in colours of the coats of arms of the House of Michiel is here: Image:Doge Domenico Michiel.png. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto 22:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Ooops, mi avevi scritto in italiano. Scusa. Ti stai occupando dei dogi veneziani, per caso?

Category:Jewish people of Spain

Image deletion warning

Category:Jewish people of Spain has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thank you

Thanks for your help! Regards --Fergon 18:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

usage of categories

hello there Warburg,

I had to revert your readdition of the category "Giambologna" to my images of the Image:Villa Castello Florence Apr 2008 (20).JPG. If category A is in category B which is in C, then you don't list A again under C. This is called "over-categorisation", the policy regarding this can be found here Commons:Categories#Over-categorization. feel free to ask if you have any questions. sincerly Gryffindor 17:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Please tag your images

---

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Use of image in textbook

Dear Warburg,

I am interested in using one of your photographs in a textbook, but I don't think this use is covered by the Sharealike license. Please contact me for more information. My e-mail address is mcintyre[removethispart]@sinauer.com (but you need to remove the part in square brackets, of course).

David McIntyre Sinauer Associates Sunderland, MA 01375 USA

File:BE churchyard (8).JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Warburg!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:BE churchyard 2(1).JPG is uncategorized since 18 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Marin Falier.JPG is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Wü Festung (1).JPG was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
• Image:Geilnau Waldeck.jpg was uncategorized on 16 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 01:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Ghirlandia Modena.JPG

File:Ghirlandia Modena.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Dryopteris spring.JPG

Hi Warburg - do you have a location and species identification for this, please? - Thanks, MPF (talk) 11:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Palladio pducale.JPG

Please change license in PD-old or PD-art, as you are not the author of course. ;) Thank you. Marcok (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I used the wrong kind of predefined message, sorry. This was simply to remind you that you cannot license a file with GFDL (as it were yours) if it is already in the public domain. Please check if you uploaded other old PD images as GFDL and correct, thank you. --Marcok (talk) 07:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

BE churchyard (4).JPG This is a picture of the gravestone of my great-great grandmother. Do you have the picture of the other larger gravestone to the right? Thank you, Andrew Wagner (obgenetics@att.net)

Historism

Could I ask you to look in at Commons:Village pump#Category:Historism? Since you placed Category:Exterior views of the Altes Museum Berlin into Category:Historism, you may have some insight into intent. - Jmabel ! talk 23:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

House at 17 Cranston Street and Suggestion

If you were to see the building in sunlight, I think you would agree that it's blue, not green. May I suggest that given the volume of Category work you do that you look at using HotCat, available for both Commons and Wikipedia on your My preferences page? It makes category adds/deletes/changes a one step process. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 15:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

File:K Gereon Meistermann.JPG

File:K Gereon Meistermann.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Raymond 22:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the pictures you uploaded about the Filarete Doors... I've been searching for them for such long, it's a great improvement for Commons ;) --Sailko (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Hate is not a virtue...

... I agree ! But it would have been better to correct the cat instead of removing it ! (at least you could have changed it to cat "Allegories" if you didn't know the existence of a more precise one...) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I see you haven't quite understood what I told you... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm very sorry, but my English is not the best one. Please, do what you think, what is correct and neccessary. Thanks a lot. --Warburg (talk) 07:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Venetian curch interior

• San Francesco della Vigna as per this image. My best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File:BRX-musée-musique.1.JPG

File:BRX-musée-musique.1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 19:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

File:BRX-musée-musique.2.JPG

File:BRX-musée-musique.2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 19:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Český Krumlov

Hey, thank you for the help!--Juandev (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Milano Piccoloteatro.JPG

File:Milano Piccoloteatro.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Meier arapacis10.JPG

File:Meier arapacis10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Raoli ✉ (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:December 2012 in Switzerland etc.

Hi Warburg, please comment in future re-categorisations as p.e. that. btw: that upload was photographed in Category:December 2012 in Switzerland, and please avoid not-commented edits to avoid missunderstandings, thanks and best regards, Roland 22:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

File

Schändung der Kirche Jona während der Belagerung von Rapperswil 1656 durch die Zürcher Truppen, Aquarell aus der Chronik von Heinrich Rothenflue, Pfarrer in Jona, 1679, KG Rapperswil-Jon 2012-12-01 16-59-35 (P7700).JPG

December 2012 in Switzerland is not an admissible category. Because
Belagerung_von_Rapperswil has been in the museum in 2011, as well as it will be in 2013, 2014, 2015 and so on.
The date of taking a picture will be documented in any case in commons by Metadata.

Please see 'category: In Switzerland in 2012' : Nothing else has happened in Switzerland, except taking pictures in a museum by an only photographer? Kind regards, --Warburg (talk) 07:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, as per default, see category template, regardless of the country:

[quotation] ..images/pictures taken in Switzerland in this month...[quotation]

That's why it's an admissible category.

And,

1. there is a bot that will add that category to other images taken within December 2012,
2. in fact, there's is a limited number of wikipedians taking photographs, also in Switzerland,
3. December just started two days ago.

Kind regards, Roland 15:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Meier arapacis10.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Merci…

de m’aider à catégoriser cette cérémonie ! Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Monk's House

Hi

I just added File:Virginia Woolf's bed at Monk's House.jpg and added the category Monk's House, you've changed this to Monk's house. The H in House needs to be capitalised, I have 20 or so more images to upload so plan to move the images currently in Monk's house to Monk's House as there's no way to rename the category, as per Commons:Rename_a_category.

--Mrjohncummings (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

just existing: Category:Monk's house, containing 9 files. --Warburg (talk) 20:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

The category name is wrong it should be Monk's House, I'll fix the category when I upload the next group of images. Thanks, --Mrjohncummings (talk) 20:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Is not my problem. --Warburg (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Kolbe Liebermann.JPG

File:Kolbe Liebermann.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kolbe Christus.JPG

Hallo Warburg, ich gehe davon aus, dass diese Skulptur von innen (Innenraum) aufgenommen wurde. Dann gibt es dasselbe Problem wie bei obiger DR. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Jaja, du hast ja so recht. --Warburg (talk) 08:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Delaunay Iliazd.JPG

File:Delaunay Iliazd.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Belvedere_(Vatican)

Belvedere (Vatican) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Danny lost (talk) 01:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Porticus

Porticus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Ponti nel ghetto

Non "so tutto di Venezia", ci mancherebbe, comunque il Ghetto ha due sole entrate, e non per caso, dato che doveva essere possibile chiuderci dentro gli ebrei di notte. La prima entrata, quella antica, e che un tempo era anche l'unica, si apre sulla "fondamenta" di un canale, e non ha nessun ponte: è l'arco (accanto a dove ora c'è il ristorante kosher), che un tempo era chiuso da un portone, di notte.
Nell'Ottocento, dopo l'abolizione del ghetto, è stato poi costruito un ponte sul Rio di san Gerolamo, dalla parte opposta all'ingresso antico, e questo è oggi l'unico ponte di accesso al ghetto, ossia che porti dalla zona esterna al ghetto fino alla zona interna al ghetto. Infine, esistono due ponti INTERNI al ghetto sul Rio del ghetto, che uniscono il ghetto vecchio al ghetto novo e il ghetto novo al ghetto novissimo, che però non sono ponti di accesso al ghetto: per usarli occorre essere già dentro al ghetto. Spero che questo risponda alla tua domanda. Ciao! --User:G.dallorto (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

GWT category

Hi, I noticed that you removed the GWT category with this change. This means it will not be counted in later stats, and may miss out on systematic improvements. Was this intended? --Fæ (talk) 19:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

??? --Warburg (talk) 19:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Death and the Maiden from Bode museum

File:12 Bode Death and the Maiden 1.JPG

Thank you for this remarkable image. Do you have any information about it, other than it is in the Bode museum? Who made it, from what period? How big is it? It looks in the picture that it is almost full-size, but you write it is made of ivory, so it couldn't be that big. Any information would be welcome. --Ravpapa 12:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Warburg! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Kurt Wolff.JPG

File:Kurt Wolff.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Evil IP address (talk) 19:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Poster Rau.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Poster Rau.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Poster Rau.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

WolfD59 (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs

Maslow's hierarchy of needs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

I2brahim (talk) 14:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Villa_Torlonia_(7)

Dear Warburg, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Villa_Torlonia_(7).jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nickname in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer.

Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com

hippofish 12:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Iliazd Lidantju.JPG

File:Iliazd Lidantju.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Klimsch Liebermann.JPG

File:Klimsch Liebermann.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Feltrinelli.JPG

File:Feltrinelli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Havang(nl) (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:K Gereon Buschulte 01.JPG

And also:

• File:K Gereon Buschulte 02.JPG
• File:K Gereon Buschulte 03.JPG
• File:K Gereon Buschulte 04.JPG
• File:K Gereon Buschulte 05.JPG
• File:K Gereon Buschulte 06.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Questions upon the use of one of your images

Hello Warburg,

Thank you very much for all the images in public domain. I am a researcher in France and it is a very big help.

I have got some questions about your image VoidStone, 1987, from George Brecht. I would like to use it in an upcoming book, that will be published at Les presses du réel, Dijon France. Is the Public Domain License still ok for you? And if it is ok, could you give me your real name, so I could write you as a credit for the image?

Thanks in advance

Best Regards,

Avert Erik

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ko Stolzenfels Menas.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)