Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2023

File:Wood duck drake (86815).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2023 at 03:01:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
Info Wood duck drake (Aix sponsa) vocalizing. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rich color palette -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Really pretty drake, and well photographed as usual. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 475935 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix

File:Lower Chasm Falls.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2023 at 07:13:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
Info created and uploaded by Lukemcoop - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support don't really have anything to say about this, really. No similar FPs of similar waterfalls and even finding images of this specific waterfall doesn't seem to be an easy task (but that should be no surprise given that its location is unmarked on maps). --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Due to, among other things, the long opening time, this photo exudes for me an atmosphere of a fairytale world that actually does not exist.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah, I just came along with "nice colours". Simply ignoring the fact, that there's this whole fairytale connection thing. I'm a simple man. I see a long time exposure, I like.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 460506 02:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I appreciate the long exposure and the framing, it's mind-blowing. But the greens look oversaturated to me.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per above and the sharpness could be better. -- Ivar (talk) 11:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose The waterfall image we'd all like to say we took, but ... the forest area looks to have been poorly processed; there's some serious CA on an almost blown tree above the waterfall. Yes, it is a long exposure, but we've seen other long exposures of waterfalls handled better technically. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over-processed. Too contrasted and over-saturated colors (like all the uploads by this user) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose When I was young such photos were common even in expensive illustrated books – compared to digital photograph, film photography preserves more information in the highlights, but less in the shadows, so on film it was difficult to preserve shadow details with such motifs. But today we can do better, even without HDR. I would be neutral, because it’s still a nice scene, and I see why you have nominated it, but per Basile’s hint it seems reasonable that the user has even increased the contrast in post – and this is something I do not understand, sorry ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tassie's green (by Australian standards), but it's not that shade of green, no matter where you go or how you look at it. Definitely oversaturated. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardinal (86755).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2023 at 03:07:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)
Info Female northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not really into bird photography, but this little one has charm and is presented just as it should --Kritzolina (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, good light, sharp, not oversharpened. --Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support An excellent photo that, unfortunately, makes me a little sad. I mentioned the last time you nominated a picture of a female of this species that we had one as a pet, legally (long story). Sadly she died in an accident I don't want to talk about (granted, she was over 18 years old, ancient by the standards of her wild counterparts) earlier this year. The bird in this picture looks more like her than the other one, and it did make us warmly nostalgic. It is indeed a striking and exemplary picture of the female of the species. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 479235 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As always you have been very good at capturing the image through a golden light that in this case seems to kiss every detail and every feather of the bird. -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)

File:24.02. kell 8.33. 1989 Toompeal (02).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2023 at 15:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1980-1990
Info created & uploaded by Kynnap - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Hoisting the blue-black-and-white flag on Toompea on the morning of February 24, 1989 (Estonian Independence Day). This was the first time since 1944 when the Estonian flag returned to the Pikk Hermann tower. Estonia was still under Russian (Soviet) occupation. More can be read from this virtual exhibition here. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file needs a proper description, not just a repetition of the file name. --El Grafo (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kruusamägi (talk) 16:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not a great photo and too small. Try nominating at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Vignetting, low resolution, grainy, and not special enough in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Basile - Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too small for FP. Yann (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Bunten Kronwicke (Securigera varia) Blüte-20200626-RM-173640.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2023 at 20:22:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae
InfoClose-up of a variegated crown vetch. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly qualified support The stem and lower parts have a slight graininess which I am not sure I can say is the effect of the sunlight. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special contrejour highlighting the transparency of the petals, and good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 467106 09:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae

File:Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 10:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical_devices
Info Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro backside. My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there a reason for the lack of continuous sharpness?--Ermell (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Love the composition, but as noted there's far more that isn't sharp than is. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose exactly per Daniel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Call me a moron but I like it exactly for the limited DoF ;–). Product photos do not always need to be sharp from one end to the other, they can also emphasize the beauty (?) of the product by small DoF like in a portrait photograph. A totally sharp photo of this phone would be boring; the crop, the tilt and the small DoF make it interesting. --Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Daniel, but it’s still good for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. -- Karelj (talk) 16:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose As much as I like the composition and the fact that the DoF complements the gradual fading of the coulours, at least the black bezel around the lenses should be in entirely in focus to make this a FP for me. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 19:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like very much the limited DoF me too. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shallow depth of field is a deliberate artistic choice which I actually like in this case. I find that makes the photo more vibrant and interesting than a totally sharp subject, as Aristeas wrote. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 12:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Everest, Nuptse, Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, Himalayas.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 12:22:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info One telephoto view of Mount Everest, specifically its southwest face, has already been posted to FP gallery, but this one gives a broader perspective on Mount Everest and what is sometimes referred to as Everest Crown. An Everest-Lhotse-Nuptse massif is shown here as viewed from the west, illuminated by the late afternoon sun in rare and very favorable weather conditions. Khumbu Glacier and Khumbu Icefall, important geological features related to the massif are also in view. All by --Argenberg (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The scene is outstanding, but the technical quality is not. It's too noisy.--Milseburg (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have two versions of this file with different treatments, and it looks like the latest one does exhibit some visible noise artifacts in the sky, likely due to high-frequency sharpening. Some extra steps have been taken to eliminate noise in affected areas. I estimate the image is largely free of noise now. --Argenberg (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great photo for me. It doesn't seem like a photo that is easy to realize.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In my recent work diffusing the mountains with snow category I have seen a lot of pictures like this of Everest, and this one just doesn't stand out from the crowd. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry but I have to disagree with you about this. Of all the views of Everest Crown from Kala Patthar, this one is easily the best out there. Other reviewers can take a look to make sure for themselves: Category:Views of Mount Everest from Kala Patthar. Also I would like to note that there are not so many good photographs of Mount Everest on Wikimedia Commons in total, not limited to Kala Patthar. The choice is limited. There are just a handful of them any good and/or above 12MP, across all viewpoints. --Argenberg (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel, could you link some of the photos of Everest that impress you more? Maybe File:Sagarmatha National Park-Gorak Shep to Pheriche 2013-05-06 08-10-23-2013-05-06 08-11-08.jpg, but it's small for an FP, nowadays. What else? I'm finding this one impressive but would like to see several examples of photos of Everest that you like better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this one may be too small for FP, but I like the idea of the mountain backlit. From Kala Pattar, this one gives you more dramatic light and a foreground; I just wish the camera had been placed so the cairn didn't take up so much space. Namche Bazaar offers a great view, with the possibility of raking light across the mountain's face.
Those are just some examples that I like more. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the problem is that the good photos are small, mostly, and the big photos aren't all good.

My problem with this image is the flat light and the lack of anything in the foreground that draws you toward the mountain from where the camera is. You might as well be a drone or something.

It's a good representation of this particular view, I'll give it that, and as such a good VI candidate, but does that alone make it an FP? Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have a good point. Argenberg, why don't you nominate File:Changtse, Everest West Shoulder, Mount Everest, Nuptse, Nepal, Himalayas.jpg? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek, it is important to note that it’s not just a photo of Mount Everest, but rather an outline of Everest-Lhotse-Nuptse massif (Everest Triple Crown) as seen from the west, along with Khumbu Glacier and Khumbu Icefall. Everest, Nuptse and Lhotse form a massive arc. For anyone trekking to and around Mount Everest in Nepal, those labels – Everest, Lhotse, Nuptse, Khumbu, EBC, Western Cwm, South Col – always come together as parts of a single whole. The other view is limited in that it masks Khumbu Glacier and some other features, like Everest Base Camp, South Col and sections of Lhotse North Ridge. While the presented one is just more inclusive and educative, more holistic showing the massif in its full glory. That’s why I nominated it. --Argenberg (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The other one could be nominated, too, though. I feel like your argument might be more of a VIC argument than an FPC argument, but that depends on how someone is thinking about it. I'm not sure; I do think this photo is impressive and might vote for it, but I'm undecided. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support especially considering the difficult circumstances. White balance is on the cold side, but as we have discussed earlier this complies with our visual habits of seeing winter and high-mountain scenes as cold and bluish, so it’s OK. --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aristeas, just a quick note: this wider look is more balanced temperature-wise. The Nuptse wall on the right is indeed cool. But the Everest West Shoulder on the left is almost white. And large sections of Khumbu moraine at the bottom are slightly warm surprisingly. The cosmic coolness and darkness of the sky is also very natural, typical in any extreme altitude shot into middle to upper stratosphere (20 km to 50 km a. s. l.) away from the declining sun. --Argenberg (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these additional insights! --Aristeas (talk) 08:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 473930 02:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Nepal

File:ArT of opEN doors project - Rua de Santa Maria - Funchal 10.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2023 at 06:55:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question I have not found anything stating conclusively that Portugal's FoP statutes extend to two-dimensional artworks in public, and even if they do attribution is required. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd vote for the photo if this problem can be resolved. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I added a FoP template to the description. The FoP in Portugal includes buildings (and also parts of it). In addidtion, we have already many FPs of two-dimensional works of Protugal, see e.g. here, here, here, here, here, here and here (all by me), but there exist also FPs of other authors, see e.g. here. And please have also a look on all the pictures in the corresponding categories. --Llez (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 462094 09:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 11:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

File:Parque Nac dos Lençois Maranhenses Vania Passos 16.png, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 11:28:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created & uploaded by Vania Passos – nominated by Ivar (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question I can't understand the picture. It doesn't look natural to me, can anyone explain?--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I get it: the white "river" is actually dunes. But this looks like a drone pic yet isn't. Was unusual processing used? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fabian Roudra Baroi: this is a aerophoto of the landscape and on the ground it looks like this. -- Ivar (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC):Thanks for explaining, I got it. But as I dont have much knowledge about this kind of photographs I'm gonna be Neutral.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ until Ikan's query is resolved. Give me a ping when that happens. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek & SHB2000: I'm not sure, what kind explanation you expect. This is a aerophoto of the landscape (taken probably from the plane). -- Ivar (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. That's a useful explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000: You wanted a ping ;–) Now there is an explanation by the author of the photo, Vania Passos, see below. --Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping, Aristeas! I've struct out my oppose !vote. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's hard to tell what I'm looking at -- in a good way. From the thumbnail, I would've just as easily thought this was a microscopic image. I had to do some research to figure out what this place is, and I'm surprised I haven't heard of it (and that I haven't seen it come up at FPC before): Lençóis Maranhenses National Park. Fun fact: it's where the planet of Vormir was shot for the Avengers movies. :) As for drone/aerial, isn't the next logical conclusion a helicopter? A search shows a few results for helicopter tours there. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I would like to know what's going on with the processing (and the use of the .PNG format, which may not have helped). Before reading the description I honestly thought it was some ice-cream treat packaging. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites. It could be sharper, but it’s an aerophoto and as a whole it is of overwhelming beauty, like a really good abstract painting. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author of the photo. I made it from a small plane, without the side door, sitting and facing with the camera down. They are white dunes and the black river whose waters have this coloration, due to the chemical composition of the waters. Vania Passos Vania Passos (talk) 14:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation, Vania Passos! --Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a really interesting photo, so like a good Landsat photo, I suppose it deserves a feature. And I'd like to join Aristeas in thanking Vania for explaining the circumstances under which the photo was shot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 478685 02:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Brazil

File:Trier 100 Millionen.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2023 at 18:16:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Money & Seals
Info created by Fritz Quant, issued by the city of Trier, reproduced from an original banknote, uploaded and nominated by Palauenc05.
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting banknote, excellent reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 452495 09:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Money & Seals

File:Puente de las Legiones, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 11-13 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2023 at 13:31:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Czech_Republic
Info Legion Bridge (Czech: Most Legií, named after the Czechoslovak Legion), a historic bridge over the Vltava river in Prague, Czech Republic. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question What's going on with the light rings on the car near the left end of the bridge and the gaps in the bridge balustrade? Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ as per Case, the light rings seem to have been caused by HDR. Tiouraren (talk) 07:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wild, Daniel Case, Tiouraren, indeed HDR artifacts, will fix them tonight CET Poco a poco (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, Tiouraren: new version uploaded, what do you think? Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the car still present. -- Ivar (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gone Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately they're still there. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The light rings are definitely gone in the last version, it must be a cache problem Poco a poco (talk) 08:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Issue sorted, but street lights are overexposed, so I'll be Neutral with this one. Still a nice view though. -- Tiouraren (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Karelj (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 471897 09:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for fixing the HDR artefacts (a nasty issue, I know). --Aristeas (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Czech_Republic

File:Závrt v Moravském krasu.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2023 at 20:08:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Czech Republic
Info created and uploaded by Michal Daneš - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love for agriculture ... and this image that is such an intriguing mixture of abstract, symbolic and concrete. --Kritzolina (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I genuinely thought it was an abstract painting at first sight -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good find.--Ermell (talk) 07:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. Great find, IamMM! --Aristeas (talk) 10:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 465149 09:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 11:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Czech Republic

File:Iglesia de San Francisco de Asís, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-03, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 21:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Czech_Republic
Info Interior view of the dome of the St. Francis of Assisi Church (in Czech Kostel sv. Frantiska z Assisi), Old Town of Prague, Czech Republic. The temple is located next to the famous Charles Bridge, and viewed from the river its magnificient dome is one of the dominant features of the city skyline. The current church, that replaced an earlier Gothic church built in the 1250s-70s, was built in the Baroque style in 1679-1688 following the plans of architect Jean Baptiste Mathey. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect! --Ermell (talk) 06:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dark and little wow anyways - Benh (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've brigthened it a bit Poco a poco (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bottom window is a little weird-looking, but it's a very small part of the image and there may have been nothing that could have been done about it. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 475077 02:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Czech_Republic

File:Funningur church 2022.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2023 at 14:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Faroe_Islands
Info Historic wooden church in the village of Funningur, Eysturoy, Faroe Islands. Created by HylgeriaK - uploaded by HylgeriaK - nominated by HylgeriaK -- HylgeriaK (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- HylgeriaK (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We do have a lot of FIs of churches already, but this one stands out --Kritzolina (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It’s always great to see good photos from the Faroe Islands. --Aristeas (talk) 10:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The roof -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 465437 09:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support love the classic Faroese roof (grassy roofs are common in the Faroe Islands, but they're still unique enough to be considered a wow factor) --SHB2000 (talk) 10:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 11:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Faroe_Islands

File:Supreme Federal Court - Statue.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2023 at 20:26:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created and uploaded by Dasfour2022 - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
😁♥️🇧🇷🇺🇸 Dennis W. Asfour (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kind of a surreal composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
😀🇧🇷🇺🇸😊♥️ Dennis W. Asfour (talk) 10:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fresh! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
💐😀 Dennis W. Asfour (talk) 10:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inspired and memorable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
😊🇺🇸♥️🇧🇷 Thank you! Dennis W. Asfour (talk) 10:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a scene from some sci-fi movie … --Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
love it!! I am a sci-fi fan! Dennis W. Asfour (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I gather that you are rather pleased that it was nominated? 😁 Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That is quite an impressive photo. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, really nice photo. By the way, the sculpture was unfortunately damaged last month. RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Just surreal enough to make me forgive the unsharpness in some areas of the statue. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 465814 09:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander-93 (talk • contribs)
Support --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 11:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors

File:Удовски Остров.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2023 at 15:20:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Dean Lazarevski - uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A cropped version to get rid of the road in the top left corner is also possible.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Undoubtedly a useful image, but the composition doesn't ~~doesn't~~seem ideal for all the lines present in the shot, and more importantly it's pretty underexposed (perhaps in postprocessing?). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Doesn't doesn't"? Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are two kinds of people in this world: those who doesn't, and those who doesn't doesn't. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Underexposed and / or dull light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose would be a good VI, but unfortunately the lighting is too dark. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin and SHB2000 --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img70 Russalka Memorial.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2023 at 14:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info The Russalka Memorial in Tallinn, general view, now as single nomination. All by me --A.Savin 14:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive; the beautiful clouds are the icing on the cake. --Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The clouds make the image for me. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I liked this one more in the previous set nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 476515 09:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support clouds create different mood --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but the sharpening halos (incl. some CA) around the statue are pretty noticeable Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 11:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials

File:Emicida convida Pabllo Vittar. (49509196507).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2023 at 13:03:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created by Festival Sensacional - uploaded by Edu! - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral There's action there, and it's probably a useful image, but the steep upward angle combined with the subject looking upwards and the crop don't really work for me. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Rhododendrites. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support considering Rhododendrites’ point, but it’s still very ex- and impressive. Good soft OOF background. --Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Rhododendrites. SHB2000 (talk) 05:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The out-of-focus, cropped left hand is bugging me. Otherwise, I really like it, so I'll probably abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 10:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition feels awkward to me. A wider crop at the bottom could work, an over-all tighter one work too, but this is not it. --El Grafo (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti Vinnytsia 2022 G1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2023 at 09:46:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info Patriotic graffiti on a wall in Vinnytsia, Ukraine during the war 2022. Too simple to be copyrighted. Graffiti created by an unknown painter, photo created and uploaded by George Chernilevsky, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This looks like a purely political nomination, right? ;–) But it isn’t, I am fascinated by the simple beauty of this picture since I first saw it. There are at least three reasons: (1) Seen as a photo, this is a successful minimalist shot; at first glance it appears like a graphic, but at second glance you can see the stones of the wall, which give the picture reality and materiality. I like this dual nature of the image. (2) When it comes to patriotic images, we like to reach deep into the symbols box – eagles, lightning bolts, weapons, marching soldiers threatening the enemies of the fatherland etc. This would be perfectly understandable in the case of Ukraine, which sees itself threatened with the eradication of its national and cultural identity. Nevertheless, the painter has chosen the simplest and purest symbol: a heart, which, together with the flag, simply expresses love for the homeland. I have never seen a more sympathetic, unproblematic way of depicting patriotism. (3) Now one might say: no reason to feature the picture, you can paint a heart in any flag. But that’s not so, it only works so well with a few national flags (I have tried it). Firstly, because the flag of Ukraine has only two, not three or four stripes, secondly, because the colours just fit perfectly – the red shines out and harmonises perfectly with the blue and yellow. The result is an absolutely simple and absolutely harmonious composition. --Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support regardless of the war, I'd have supported this for its simplicity and composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the purity of feelings to an assaulted nation! --Ras67 (talk) 11:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is nothing to add to what the nominator wrote --Kritzolina (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add no, but long speech could just be shortened :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed ;–). Well, I expected strong head wind to this nomination, therefore I felt the need for a thorough reasoning. But it seems that less words would have been sufficient ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support P.S.: the love will win in Ukraine, I believe it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lotje (talk) 17:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All the glory to Ukraine but not to this one. The image itself is supposed to be extremely geometric yet it has visible distortion. -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per SHB2000. Minimalist in a good way. I'm not seeing the distortion KennyOMG noticed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 02:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 473249 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 00:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals

File:The Lycian Way - 2014.10 - panoramio.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 11:00:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Turkey
Info created by rheins - uploaded by Panoramio upload bot - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 11:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 11:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Could be a bit sharper and a lot of violet CAs around the stones on the right side, especially in the lower part --Llez (talk) 12:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Llez --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Really beautiful scene, with the balloons as a bonus, but there are posterization diagonals in the sky that I don't think an FP should have. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination —Bruce1ee^talk 07:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duck ling ship hong kong.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2023 at 15:00:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Hong Kong
Info created and uploaded by Arne_Müseler - nominated by Benh (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support classic view of HK. Well framed. -- Benh (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Framing--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 475269 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like it, but I feel like there is color noise on the buildings. Maybe a product of fog? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- You are right, chroma noise is all over the picture (not only the buildings). Looks like the picture was heavily brightened in post. Still looks fine to me given the size but I wouldn't say no to more chroma noise reduction.
Benh (talk) 09:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ca but nice contrast. Tomer T (talk) 12:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A great view, but in addition to the chroma noise noted above the background is dull and indeed most of the image outside of the boat is less sharp than one would like. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Still a nice view. IMHO the chroma noise is relatively unobtrusive in this case, so tolerable. IMHO it’s OK that the background is OOF, the subject is certainly the boat. --Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. --Milseburg (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is one of those "tell me this is HK without telling me this is in HK" images. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Also per Daniel.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Hong Kong

File:Volkswagen ID. Buzz 1X7A6728.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2023 at 17:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info Volkswagen ID. Buzz from BBS at de:Retro Classics 2023 in front of the Messe Stuttgart convention center. All by me - nominated by Alexander-93 -- Alexander-93 (talk) 17:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander-93 (talk) 17:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There's no wow in the slightest. Muggy weather, weird buildings. Sick car though. Sea Cow (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree. The car is worth an FP, but the gray sky ruins the mood to me. I could see why someone might disagree, though, as it does provide a strong contrast with the colorful car. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not because of a lack of wow factor, but because of the grey sky. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are some more images of this vehicle (e.g. this one), but I chose the one with the sky, since it seems to be more interesting to me. Although the Volkswagen is the most dominant object in the other images, the "problem" with the buildings stay.--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure it would be a FP, but this one is way better in term of composition, as the background boards are distracting here. Yann (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Highbury Square - Arsenal stadium.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2023 at 14:56:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom
Info created and uploaded by Arne_Müseler - nominated by Benh (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and thorough drone view of what the old Highbury Arsenal Stadium has become -- Benh (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just another cityscape seen from a drone, TBH. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess we have less ceilings, birds and stacked flowers - Benh (talk) 09:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't get where are the "no wow" comments coming from. I quite like this drone shot and it's cool to see the Arsenal Stadium from this perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel Case. -- Karelj —Preceding undated comment was added at 10:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I get Benh's frustration above. I've nominated plenty of images that weren't the "standard subjects", and have often been disappointed. Usually they're some sort of subject where the composition can't help but be imperfect, like a street scene with lots of people. Drone shots of developments may be similar in the way a city's lines aren't conducive to the kind of neat geometry that appeals to the largest number of people. But to be fair, we are getting a lot of aerial nominations these days, too (four currently nominated), and they tend to do pretty well. The big issue here for me (perhaps biased from living in cities most of my life) is that an apartment complex, regardless of the history of the site, is one of the subjects with the least starting "wow factor". It needs a special composition or some other reason to be set apart. While this is a good and useful image (maybe a VI), I'm not sure what this angle is better than any other on the light side of the structure. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Rhododendrites --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neubrunn Steinbruch Blutrote Heidelibelle (Sympetrum sanguineum) 8262082.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2023 at 10:22:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
Info Ruddy darter (male) in the quarry of Neubrunn. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 10:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo of the dragonfly plus a nice background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 477845 02:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 04:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)

File:Bloeiaren van Diamantgras. 04-09-2022. (d.j.b) 02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2023 at 16:26:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Poaceae
Info Flowering spikes of Diamond Grass Calamagrostis brachytricha Focus stack of 18 photos. (Minimalist photography)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Background has vertical bands. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same as this one and that one. As Charles noticed, the artificial background displays visible lines, probably because its surface is not perfectly flat -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done In this new version, the exposure has been changed, but the vertical bands are still there -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't unsee the vertical bands. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've tried to remove the streaks, but I don't see them. I have another photo. Namely https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bloeiaren_van_Diamantgras._04-09-2022._(d.j.b)_01.jpg Maybe this one doesn't have the stripes and I can use that version.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The bands are there too - in the middle -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BASF Ludwigshafen panorama 2023-1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2023 at 17:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support stunning The level of detail is amazing for such a large photo, you can even see birds in the sky. Slight noise but hardly noteworthy given the high resolution. Je-str (talk) 18:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah, I find this quite astonishing. Great document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution, and nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 472950 02:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition of the BASFsite --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support How to make a nice picture from a ugly place. Yann (talk) 11:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. --Aristeas (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 04:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany

File:Boerenkrokus (Crocus tommasinianus) 28-02-2023 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2023 at 16:03:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Iridaceae
Info Covered with raindrops Crocus tommasinianus
Focus stack of 15 photos. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It seems too early for spring, but that doesn't make this photo less beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 476111 02:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Beautiful -- Spurzem (talk) 06:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 11:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of my favourite flowers, nicely captured. --Aristeas (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Iridaceae

File:Yellow orchid cluster.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2023 at 04:09:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
Info Cluster of yellow cultivar of Phalaenopsis sp. Backlit by sunlight diffused by a snow-covered window. Photographed and nominated by Gorillo.Chimpo (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gorillo.Chimpo (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Please define the species. -- -donald- (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Added in the info. Gorillo.Chimpo (talk) 13:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not fond of this fully white background, that seems artificial or overexposed, but the most embarrassing in my view is the tight crop, at the right and at the top. These margins are too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Very nice flowers, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Papaya - longitudinal section close-up view.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2023 at 16:12:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support fresh perspective! --El Grafo (talk) 08:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again excellent quality. --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I only recently learned that the seeds are edible -- they taste like little peppercorns. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support They are? I didn't know anyone ate them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good QI, but I do not see here reason for FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 453584 09:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support who doesn't like a papaya? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:RENFE 730 Linarejos-Pedroso.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 13:46:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice composition --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 458578 08:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:MTAB IORE 133 and 105 Kaisepakte - Stenbacken.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 22:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 02:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Michielverbeek --Lukas Beck (talk) 08:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and light -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support My favorite season, fall. Nice click. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support love the autumn colours! --SHB2000 (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 475215 08:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the light is wonderful. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:Torre de agua de Šítkov, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:32:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Czech_Republic
Info Water tower of Šítkov, Prague, Czech Republic. The tower was built to store water and was used to supply water for a fountain in New Town for about 200 years until 1913. It is 47 metres (154 ft) high and now is a restaurant inside. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 462631 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Czech_Republic

File:Turritella maculata 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2023 at 07:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Turritellidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 457782 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Turritellidae

File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora ante Týn, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-02, DD 259-261 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Czech_Republic
Info Church of Our Lady before Týn and Marian column, Prague, Czech Republic. The Gothic church is a dominant feature of the Old Town of Prague, in fact, it has been the main church of this part of the city since its foundation in the 14th century. The church's two towers are 80 m high, and each tower's spire is topped by eight smaller spires in two layers of four. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lukas Beck (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 471359 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Czech_Republic

File:Schloss Wernigerode 20211225 4.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2023 at 14:03:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Jasnaah - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support relatively small resolution indeed, but great composition in my eyes. -- Tomer T (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tomer. Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rosalina 🍵 459492 06:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, nice view. Technical note: It’s from a smartphone, but (as we already checked in the WLM jury) in this case the results are fine, without the usual oversharpening etc. --Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm a little hesitant because sharpness and detail aren't very high due to the equipment used, and the size of the photo barely fills a 4K screen, but indeed the scene and the composition are beautiful. The time of the year and of the day gives it a nice soft lighting without too much contrast and the framing of the snowy trees feels very natural. Lion-hearted85 (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Scene and composition are beautiful - you can sign that. That is: it is a very beautiful photo. However, for an "excellent" everything must be right. Here, technically much better candidates have already been rejected because of quality deficiencies (see for example in the full view the muddy looking forest and the roof of the castle). Sorry Je-str (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Je-str, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nomination --Kritzolina (talk) 09:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very good composition -- Spurzem (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice touch of gold (at Golden Hour). --XRay 💬 12:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany

File:Klaksvík harbour.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2023 at 13:55:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Faroe Islands
Info created & uploaded by HylgeriaK - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 23:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose} Stores at the right are a bit hanging a bit to the left --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~per Michielverbeek, a perspective correction would be nice; and at the right there are also some purple CAs.~~ @HylgeriaK: I can make these corrections if you want. Do you have a raw image file (ARW file) for this image? It would be better to do the corrections on the base of the ARW file, but we can also use the JPG file if there is no ARW … Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC) Done, see below. --Aristeas (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Michielverbeek. Also a fairly average pic of Klaksvík from the many I've seen. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colors and clear air, but overall the composition is't outstanding. --Milseburg (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 469897 02:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colors --Mile (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Espec. @Michielverbeek and SHB2000: In agreement with HylgeriaK I have uploaded a new version, developed from the raw image file. The perspective is corrected and CAs have been fixed. The crop is a little bit wider at top and bottom. There is a bit more microcontrast and some colours are a bit more vivid now – not because I had increased the saturation (actually I have decreased it), it’s just because the raw image file provides these colours. Hope it helps, --Aristeas (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful and calming view. I love the clouds around the top of the mountain in the background. --Aristeas (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The clouds just above the hill are wow! --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Faroe Islands

File:Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg. 18-09-2022. (actm) 09.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2023 at 05:40:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Musical instruments
Info Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg church interior, church organ and old fresco.s
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a nice organ, but it's everything else that's in the picture that makes it beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful soft light and atmosphere. --Aristeas (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first I thought there was some sort of inverse vignetting going on ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 17:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Musical instruments

File:Peter Hrivňák alias Kuko.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 05:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created and uploaded by Roman Kudláček - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 05:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please ad an English description.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could we have some kind of explanation about why this person is performing with this kind of headdress? --Kritzolina (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah, that's quite disconcerting and reminiscent of blackface. That's not an argument to oppose a feature, but on the face of it, I'm pretty put off by it. I hope there's a good explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment +1. --Aristeas (talk) 08:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have no idea. To me it's just a typical Indian headdress but it certainly can't be a FP if it has an offensive and racist meaning behind it. I hope someone with more cultural knowledge can give a clear explanation about this issue. IamMM (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is: Yes, this looks like a typical headdress worn by indigenous people in North America, but the person wearing it seems to be a Czech singer with no connections to this ethnicity. As such it can be regarded an instance of Cultural appropriation. While we certainly could have images as FP that show cultural appropriation, it should be very clear from the image title and description what we are seeing in such instances. Otherwise we are blindly promoting things that are considered racist. Kritzolina (talk) 14:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment They are banned at the Glastonbury festival and some aspects are illegal in the US, BBC article. There is also a paper on the subject or an easy read on MTV. --Cart (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support may be a bit noisy Ezarateesteban 23:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination According to the discussion above, I am convinced that this image can potentially be considered offensive to a group of people. Thanks for all the votes and comments -- IamMM (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zemmer Fürstenkreuz 1651 (2).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2023 at 18:17:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info Sandstone cross (built 1651) on a hill near Zemmer, Germany, all by Palauenc05 -- (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very good an impressive -- Spurzem (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral could be a bit sharper --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd like to feature a photo of a wayside cross, but this is a good and not great composition to me, apart from L. Beck's point, which is less of an issue to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the starkness. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 459838 05:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Germany

File:Seven Sisters 3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 20:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United Kingdom
Info Beachy Head and Belle Tout lighthouse in East Sussex, England. Two existing FPs: File:Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017.jpg and File:Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg. Created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna. —kallerna (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite striking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 06:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the texture on the cliffs. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive cliff, risky viewpoint :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 12:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United Kingdom

File:Rickshaw back decoration.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 18:40:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created by Mrb Rafi - uploaded by Mrb Rafi - nominated by Mrb Rafi -- Mrb Rafi (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mrb Rafi (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love these decorated Rikshas and this is a very good example of one well photographed, except - could you perhaps work on the corp a bit? I find the way the tires are cut off not ideal. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kritzolina, thanks a lot for the comment. I had a very tight place to bring the rickshaw in my frame with a 50mm prime. I took more than 15 photos of it and only this one looked better. I was also feeling uncomfortable as I couldn't capture the tires fully in the frame. Would you please tell more about how I can crop it to look better? --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an ideal solution, but perhaps experimenting with cropping off more of the tires could help. Kritzolina (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think there is indeed no ideal solution, I will support anyways because of the beauty of the subject and the quality overall. Kritzolina (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wonder if this is covered by {{FoP-Bangladesh}}. If not, we have a problem... Yann (talk) 10:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, Thanks a lot for the comment. Yes, it falls under {{FoP-Bangladesh}}. The rickshaw was parked beside a under-construction rail road and the owner was having breakfast. I captured it during a photowalk (the category is yet not populated, hundreds of images are on their way to be uploaded). --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a utility object, just as any other vehicle. See COM:UA. --A.Savin 14:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful, but very tight crops left and right that are causing me to hesitate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The quality is very good and the subject is very interesting. Though the crop is a draw back but IMO acceptable.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tight crops, distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Fabian. --Aristeas (talk) 06:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Fabian. Background is a bit distracting. — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 07:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per others.--Princess Rosalina 🍵 472998 08:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per SHB2000 --Ermell (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Cropped wheels and desaturated background, contrast, no wow. --Micha (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful very weak oppose I like very much what this image wants to accomplish. But while it's definitely a QI, it isn't quite there for FP ... I think the background is just a little too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --El Grafo (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see any reason why the crop couldn't have been better, too tight in both sides and unfortunate at the bottom, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nafiul adeeb (talk) 05:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Regardless of the outcome of this nomination, this could be a good COM:VIC nomination if it's best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per others. Mehediabedin (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Willersdorf Aisch Luftbild-20210704-RM-163114.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 15:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info The river Aisch near Willersdorf. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it --PierreSelim (talk) 09:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Land art made by nature. --Aristeas (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Aristeas. Nice composition and good sharpness for a drone pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Heilbronn - Böckingen - Friedhof - Blick von der Kapelle zum Haupteingang (1).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 22:24:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Germany
Info created & uploaded by User:Aristeas - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this photo very much. That's probably all that needs to be said on my behalf (except: is there a better way to categorize cemeteries?), but I'll be interested to see what you all think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Create /Places/Cemeteries ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for the suggestion, Charles! Well, I have counted about 20 cemetery/graveyard photos on that gallery page (and there may be some more scattered over other pages), so it seems valid to create the suggested /Places/Cemeteries extra page. I can do that. What do others think? --Aristeas (talk) 13:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a great idea. Happy to nominate this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will create a new /Places/Cemeteries gallery page in the next days. --Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Ikan! --Aristeas (talk) 13:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Cemeteries#Germany

File:Alfombra de algas amarillas, parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 42.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a nice abstract shot, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ukrainian flag is everywhere --Ermell (talk) 23:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Original picture but no wow for me. Just a colorful mass, indistinct at thumbnail size, and indistinct at full size too. I appreciate the "abstract" aspect of the photograph looking like a painting, but beyond this the content is quite boring in my view. No personally touching detail. Punctum missing. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support On the one hand – yes, we cannot recognize much, its a colourful fluidum. On the other hand – when I look at it a while in full size it has a fascinating effect, I almost go into a trance, like when listening to some really cool music. OK, maybe that’s just mine, but imagine this as a big print on a whole wall in a club or a bar, the effect would be excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- From another world, I love it. Dinkum (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another image with that Cocteau Twins album-cover vibe. Very pleasing to look at. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 478890 06:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose indistinct --Lupe (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This could be a good VI, in addition to already being a QI, but the composition strikes me as pretty random. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Other lifeforms

File:Aphantopus hyperantus - Keila.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2023 at 19:34:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A very high quality image as usual, but it does not show any of the forewing like this image (mine!). This other FP should probably be delisted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp: yes, your picture is showing more forewing, but the level of detail and compo is no match for this one. -- Ivar (talk) 07:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 23:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail. Good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)

File:Nacimento del Ebro (Fontibre).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2023 at 01:05:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Cantabria
Info created by Cr7Carlos- uploaded by Cr7Carlos - nominated by Cr7Carlos -- Cr7Carlos (talk) 01:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cr7Carlos (talk) 01:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it's to unsharp for me and to bright in the background --Lukas Beck (talk) 13:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Lukas. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low level of detail, blown out highlights in the background. --August Geyler (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Lukas Beck and August Geyler.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination I withdraw my image from the candidature. --Cr7Carlos (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luzern asv2022-10 Pauluskirche img3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2023 at 01:31:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info Interior view of Pauluskirche (St. Paul's Church) in Lucerne; all by me --A.Savin 01:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 01:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite a beautiful church, and in a style I've never seen. Too bad the sides are a little unsharp, but I think it's a deserving candidate, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I propose to crop the sides (see note) --Llez (talk) 09:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crop works well too. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose looks a bit off-centre to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. (The crop would be OK, too.) --Aristeas (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 474554 23:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 12:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Switzerland

File:Australian Zebra Finch 0A2A3013.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 07:29:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Estrildidae_(Estrildid_Finch)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 07:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cr7Carlos (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but which bird is male and which is female should be specified. I'm guessing the more flashy-looking one is the male. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The left is the male, the female is at the right --Llez (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As I expected. Info added. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 471533 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Estrildidae_(Estrildid_Finch)

File:Mastlé Odles Stevia.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 10:24:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and calming view. Welcome back to FPC, Wolfgang! --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image notes are on the wrong page, IMO. They should be on the file page, not on the nomination page -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Basile is right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info and support, I made a big mess trying to delete the image notes Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you for taking care of this. Your image notes add a lot of value to your photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per August Geyler and Daniel Case -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Poco a poco (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well composed. Gives a pleasing well balanced view. --August Geyler (talk) 12:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You really want to just walk into this one. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 479655 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:MASP Brazil.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 01:33:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created by Lina Bo Bardi - uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not find the picture quality sufficient. The unstable surroundings are disturbing. --Ermell (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ermell. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think an FP of this building would be possible, but with a different background. There's too much going on there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not from this angle, at least, I think. It's an ugly view to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ermell.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 18:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info View of the coastal artillery site Cenizas, Cartagena, Spain. It was built together with the coastal artillery Castillitos in order to protect the entrance to the Bay of Cartagena in the Mediterranean Sea. The construction took place between 1930 and 1934 following a project from 1926 during the dictatorship of Primo de Rivera. The site hosts 4 38.1 cm /45 Model 1926 naval guns like the one depicted here from british manufacturer Vickers-Armstrongs. It's a Spanish National Heritage Monument since 1985. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral it's a bit dark. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: I took the picture after sunset Poco a poco (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cr7Carlos (talk) 01:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 456953 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:عکس مسجد شاه اصفهان-معماری ایرانی صفویه -سال ۲۰۱۴ میلادی- عکاس مصطفی معراجی - بانک تصاویر رایگان ویکیپدیا 09.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2023 at 08:11:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mostafameraji -- Mostafameraji (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mostafameraji (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose the shadows and the lighting. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info The original nomination was plagued by a timestamp problem – the bot will try to close it again and again, and when we exclude the bot, we also lose the benefits of automatic nomination processing. Therefore I have re-created this nomination with a proper (current) timestamp and copied the existing votes to this (the new) nomination. Please continue discussion and votes here. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per SHB2000 -- IamMM (talk) 11:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per SHB2000.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per SHB2000.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per SHB and other opposes; also the WB seems a little cool even considering the prevalence of blues in the image, it seems like it should have been a vertical rather than a horizontal, and there are obvious perspective issues. 02:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Case (talk • contribs) 02:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 18:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Spain
Info Church of Our Lady of Grace, Cartagena, Spain. The barroque church is located in the center of the city and was built between 1713 and 1798. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cr7Carlos (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the image looks a bit off-centre to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SHB2000: I applied a tiny crop on the right (along with the top). Please, consider that the Prie-dieus are not symmetric. Poco a poco (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LGTM.

Support, and thank you for your swift response :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 19:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 451812 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Spain

File:Klimahaus Bremerhaven 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2023 at 05:57:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite an interesting sight: it looks to me like a blimp with a tower sticking out of it (though I suppose that's another building behind it). Beautiful clouds, good light and good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Or like a ship. Here you have the look from the opposite side. The "tower" is the Atlantic Hotel Sail City. --Llez (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like the hotel building. The new Google Building in Downtown Austin looks something like that, with a curved facade on one side, and at night, when it's beautifully lit up, it really adds character to that city's skyline. The view of this building from the other side is really strange, though. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 477347 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought at first it was a submarine. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was thinking tugboat ... --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img30 Oder railway bridge.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 15:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info Railway tracks towards the rail bridge Frankfurt (Oder), a crossing of Germany–Poland border. All by me --A.Savin 15:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice long sight lines and good light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan —Bruce1ee^talk 06:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perspective, light and clouds make this a FP for me. --Aristeas (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Entering railroad facilities is prohibited in Germany and life-threatening. Even if you are in the safe vicinity of a level crossing such photos should be provided with warning template. Tragically, people are killed time and again when trying to take such pictures.--Ermell (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agree that it makes sense to add a warning template to the description of this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Apart from Ermell concerns, the perspective view is nice but I struggle to see wow here Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose missing wow here and this was not a safe place to take a photo. -- Ivar (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per Ermell. As an image I love it. But I started that now-deleted "Tracks are for Trains" warning template precisely because I believe it in our greater interest to discourage people from putting themselves at risk of severe injury or (most likely) death to get great photos.
Looking at the satellite/aerial views for the coords given, it does not appear that there is any crossing at track grade where this image could have been taken from ... it appears that a short distance east of the coords, there is a local road which crosses below grade.
Thus I think it's a reasonable assumption that the photographer parked somewhere nearby, walked up to the right-of-way, and went between the tracks to take this picture. Yes, it looks great. But while you might look both ways crossing the tracks to get there, not standing on the tracks themselves is no guarantee of safety. Most train cars, whatever's in them, are a good bit wider than the track gauge, often at least 30–50 cm on each side, and then there's the wake to think of ... usually you might want to give it an additional meter to avoid air turbulence that could pull you off your feet, and that's just in the case of a normal-speed train. If any high-speed passenger trains use this line (I suspect not, but what do I know?), you'd want to be off the ballast entirely, in either direction, because you won't have much warning).
So I regretfully oppose. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I had an accompanying person who looked after the back side all the time it took to go on tracks and shoot photos (15-20 seconds or so), all has been as safe as possible I think. What I fail to understand, as we know the picture is already taken, so either it is eligible for FP as is according to Commons guidelines, or it is not. So this discussion reminds me a bit of slanderous comments on one of my old nominations of a bird, unfortunately. Regards --A.Savin 02:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Photographically, I don't find the picture spectacular. Something special is missing, in my view, like a building in the center, or an unusual sky.

Concerning the educational value of this picture hosted on Commons, I think it can be useful in books or newspapers. We don't censor questionable images such as combat sports, alcohol, fire weapons, graffiti, motorcycle hooliganism, or urban climbing on Wikimedia Commons -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one's talking about deleting this image, just not awarding it FP. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP label rewards the best images, not the best practices -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose agree with Basile Morin: once you get over the novelty that comes with the camera position, it is really not that great of a photograph after all. Or in other words: if we had more people willing to take this risk, this wouldn't really stand out among other one-point perspective shots of active railways. --El Grafo (talk) 08:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Alex Florstein (talk) 06:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Ermell (talk) 23:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melospiza melodia JRVdH 03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 15:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passerellidae (New world sparrows)
Info created by Cephas - uploaded by Cephas - nominated by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blured chest feathers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cr7Carlos (talk) 01:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have two FPs of this species, but both quite different from this. While I think the one I nominated a few months back works better as an infobox-style image, I think I would've been happier to take something like this one. The colors and composition (apart from that one pesky branch) are great. As an aside, I'm glad to see the name Cephas back at FPC. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 474826 23:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passerellidae (New world sparrows)

3 Views of Clam Castle, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2023 at 10:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

South side of Clam Castle
East side of Clam Castle
Northeast side of Clam Castle

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria
Info Three views of Clam Castle, municipality of Klam, Upper Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks like a valid set but can they all be to scale please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: what exactly do you mean? --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - The building is closest in the second image than in the first and in the third image is further away. I think it would be better if they all looked the same size. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Downscaling is usually not welcome here --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - This would not be downscaling, just altering the crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just had to add that I love the name of this place ... I know it's a total coincidence, but it sounds like over here in the US it would be the name of a cheap seafood joint. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support The composition of the photo of the south side, with the castle partly blocked by trees, is not as pleasing as an entire page as the other two, but the detail work is great in all three. I see Charles' point but don't find it decisive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact, there is not much hidden by the trees, because the tower to the left is up the hill and above the other buildings of the castle. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 455379 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria

File:Boslhoy Tkhach, Adygea, Большой Тхач, панорама, Адыгея.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2023 at 11:55:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
Info Bolshoy Tkhach mountain massif in spring in the Republic of Adygea, Western Caucasus. A UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1999. The landscape represents the Early Mesozoic evolution of Western Caucasus. All by --Argenberg (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sure the mountains in the background are intentionally out of focus but somehow I find that inappropriate here.--Ermell (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are not out of focus as the focus is set to infinity here. This is the effect of mist and suspended water in the air. The main cliffs on the left are quite afar, over 3 km away, and ridges on the right extend even further, up to about 15 km away and beyond. Here is another cloudy shot in the area taken just 40 minutes after this shot was made, to illustrate: File:Maly Tkhach, Adygea, Малый Тхач, Адыгея.jpg. --Argenberg (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose My problem is that the nearest foreground is not interesting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The haze keeps it from FP for me. I like the scene and composition otherwise. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - I don't have a big problem with the focus. Granted, the bar for photos of mountains is extremely high here, but my biggest objection is how heavy the composition is on the left part of the frame. Regardless, it got my attention because it looks like an establishing shot in a film before some people walk through the foreground (otherwise, we don't see the foreground as prominently and evenly lit as this). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Rhododendrites.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ermell. -- Karelj (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unappealing light in my view. Washed out background and sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kloster Veßra Luftbild-20211007-RM-115157.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2023 at 10:47:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and effective overview of the monastery. (Maybe the sharpening is a bit strong, but that’s a matter of taste.) --Aristeas (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo is a notable achievement at full size, panning over it. Beautiful light, clouds, and texture of the stones and tiles of the monastery. At full page, I might want a higher crop on the left side, but that's a minor point, and maybe I'm wrong about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 460819 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A little heavy on the sharpening ... I know it's a drone photo, but it still stands out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:37, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Black iguana (Ctenosaura similis) Cayo.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2023 at 15:53:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Iguanidae (Iguanas)
Info One FP from 2007. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus stacked image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. I also like that the lizard appears to be looking at you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support reminds me of a monitor lizard that looked at me right in the eye a few weeks ago. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 455830 23:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support But maybe you could crop off the top a bit, so the branch and the lizard are in the middle? (See note) Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not for me. I put the eye on the centre line. Charlesjsharp (talk)

Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Iguanidae (Iguanas)

File:Eiszapfen in der Zweinaundorfer Straße.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2023 at 14:33:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Snow
Info created by August Geyler - uploaded by August Geyler - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August Geyler (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tight crop at the bottom and at the top. Moreover I find the ugly board at the right and the lamppost more distracting than pleasing as part of the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretfully oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose like Basile. All the same, despite the busy and awkward composition, this image nevertheless captures the feel of wintertime in a city. Consider it as a VI candidate. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roadside hawk (Rupornis magnirostris griseocauda) eating speckled racer (Drymobius margaritiferus) Orange Walk.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2023 at 13:26:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Rupornis
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You have good eyes to identify even the prey :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 473110 23:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Rupornis

File:Gare fluviale de Québec, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2023 at 19:00:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Water_transport_infrastructure
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wonderful mood, light and colours! The verticals are leaning out a little bit and there is (at least) one abrupt transition from sharp to not-so-sharp, but IHMO that’s OK. But at the bottom right there is a white triangular area; this should be filled (if possible) or cropped out. --Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of this photo of mine of a similar subject in similar circumstances. Daniel Case (talk) 00:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A pleaseant view but please, fix the verticals and the right crop Poco a poco (talk) 09:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technical problem, per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done the cut was fixed, thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 23:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 450620 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Water_transport_infrastructure

File:Inscription at Waldfriedhof Munich 03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2023 at 20:09:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info all by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very nice. And an interesting Goethe quotation, of course, I have not seen that quotation in a cemetery before. --Aristeas (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 461125 23:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials

File:Met rijp bedekte spinrag. 01-03-2023 (d.j.b.).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2023 at 16:16:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
Info Hoarfrost-covered Spider silk on a twig. Focus stack of 10 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hoar frost is overexposed. Bottom crop distracting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The processing does not seem to be finished yet. Too many unclear areas in my opinion.--Ermell (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The cropped version does not convince me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 22:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's really beautiful. If you crop out the remaining leaves on the lower right, I will support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your suggestion.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't see anything special here. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light and unappealing crop in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-02-13 IBSF World Championships Bobsleigh and Skeleton Altenberg 1DX 5404 by Stepro.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2023 at 21:46:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info IBSF World Championships Bobsleigh and Skeleton Altenberg: Atmosphere at the World Championships, very quiet event site due to the excluded spectators due to Corona; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
Support -- Stepro (talk) 21:46, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you sort over-exposed area beneath timing display? Also, the outline of the foreground trees appear unnaturally distinct; can you have a look? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not done. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Yes, some areas are overexposed. This is probably unavoidable when a spotlight shines directly onto an ice channel and the very dark background of the image is also to be displayed well. In my opinion, this cannot be corrected in a sensible way. That's why the photo was (rightly so) rejected as a QI. However, here is FP, and for me, this photo has a massive wow factor. The interplay of light and shadow is what makes the photo special for me. I won't try to manipulate the photo in a big way, as I think that would also destroy the - for me - great mood. If others don't see this so-called wow effect, then that's the way it is. I at least plan to let this photo decorate my wall. ;-) Stepro (talk) 00:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Blown highlights at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. -- Ivar (talk) 16:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Even beyond the abovementioned highlights blown so egregiously that they look painted illustrations, the composition of this image is so busy, chaotic and random to me as to exclude it from FP on those grounds alone. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough wow to overcome the blown highlights, and I'm not sure I love the composition, though it definitely has some appealing elements. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Stepro (talk) 06:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karlštejn in winter.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2023 at 11:59:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Czech Republic
Info created and uploaded by TheGoldTiger - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great find! A beautiful fairytale castle-in-the-snow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Really a fairytale. --Aristeas (talk) 17:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 458404 23:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another gold touched castle, thanks for nominating! --Kritzolina (talk) 07:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent view point. Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Czech Republic

File:MPMC22D-38KS3G DIMM.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 22:46:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded by Mister rf - nominated by Mister rf -- Mister rf (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! But I'd prefer you to present it as a set of pictures. Both sides of this RAM module. Thanx anyway! --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about this version – both sides in one picture? --Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a long story. The promoted photo has been included in the combined photo. However, because the two photos that were used to combine the final image, were produced in two separate sessions, due to a user error, mea culpa, they do not natively have the same resolution, and for one of them, the one presented here, which had larger size, it was necessary to resize it to the lowest resolution. Through this ad hoc resizing operation, without respecting certain criteria, original clarity is lost. The photo promoted here has the native pixel resolution. Mister rf (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still like the result of those operations better. Could you offer it as an alternative? I'm not sure it would be considered an alternative, though. Maybe it's too different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Mister rf (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]

File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3341-msu-2021-.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2023 at 12:20:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks
Info created and uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The long exposure times makes for an appealingly strange overall impression. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose imo it has unnecessary motion blur on the background. I would prefer this one. -- Ivar (talk) 15:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggested version has been added as alternative. -- IamMM (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like this version, too, that motion blur makes it even more mystic ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Version edit

Support Indeed better than the above. Yann (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are aspects I like better in the nomination above, but overall this is the better image. Is this ice on the river? If so, we should have a category about that. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment no ice, long exposure effect on the water. -- Ivar (talk) 09:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive, has a surrealistic touch. @Matthias Süßen: There was a dust spot at the bottom right. Because I know that you are busy in real life, I have taken the liberty to upload a version with the dust spot removed (no other changes), just as a little help. I hope this is OK for you, else just revert please. --Aristeas (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Dear Aristeas. Thank you for your editing. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to do it myself. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 14:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome (gerne geschehen), Matthias! --Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --August Geyler (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 479723 02:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks

The chosen alternative is: File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3339-msu-2021-.jpg

File:Ravi Coltrane at the Blue Note, March 7, 2023-L1002389.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2023 at 16:16:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know this !vote won't change the outcome, but I don't find this picture of a performing musician up to the standards of other such FPs. The background is too busy and distracting for me; Coltrane's pose is too static, not conveying the intensity of performance, not like this picture. Daniel Case (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 462009 23:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'll have to back up Daniel here. It's not a bad shot by any means, but it's missing something special. --El Grafo (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Daniel has got a point, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians and singers performing

Cerastis rubricosa caterpillar, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 07:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Side view
Dorsal view

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Are these 'studio' shots (nothing wrong with that, just curious)? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment nope, shooting place is natural: wet wooded meadow and the caterpillar is on the feeding plant Gymnadenia conopsea. -- Ivar (talk) 11:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. The time clock and delay between the images made me think it was after dark... Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it couldn't have been after dark – sunset on 3th of july is around 22:30 at my hometown latitude and delay between photos meant, that caterpillar was wandering around on the plant. -- Ivar (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 23:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. You could add an approximate size to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, smooth gradient bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 462943 02:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question What's going on with that sharp break between the caterpillar's head and body in the left image? Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case: nothing unusual there, compare with this or this -- Ivar (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)

File:HP 1820-0250.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 11:01:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created by Mister rf - uploaded by Mister rf - nominated by Mister rf -- Mister rf (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's really quite an amazing closeup. Pixel sharp. Nominate at COM:VIC, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the small traces of usage at the golden parts: they make the object more ‘real’ and material. --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail, clean presentation -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 477748 02:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:Klösterle Stuben Vogelperspektive.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 16:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
Info created by & uploaded by Herbert Heim – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Already liked this as a nomination for the austrian wikimedia calendar. --Granada (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view and light -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 451539 02:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Clarkson would put it, that road could be the best driving road........ in the world. :) --Peulle (talk) 11:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see all the traffic on it until I looked at it in full-res. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Austria

File:Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 103-105 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 21:58:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Belgium
Info Church of Saint-Gilles, Brussels, Belgium. The eclectic church built between 1868 and 1878 was built over a former church (built between 1595 and 1600) which became too small for the growing city. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Alex Florstein (talk) 06:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 476961 02:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Belgium

File:Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 21:58:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Belgium
Info Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula, Brussels, Belgium. The Gothic church is dedicated to the patron saints of the City of Brussels, and is considered to be one of the finest examples of Brabantine Gothic architecture. Its construction began in the 11th century as a Romanesque church, replacing an earlier chapel, and was largely complete in its current form by the 16th century, though its interior was frequently modified in the following centuries. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If it's Gothic, it's not Romanesque, right? Or is there a mixture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: Sorry, yes, it wasn't clear. I tried to clarify it in the description. The current church is of gothic style, the previous one (which construction started in the 11th century) was Romanesque. --Poco a poco (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes perfect sense; thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support ---Alex Florstein (talk) 06:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 457979 02:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too bad the windows in the apse have blown highlights, but that's normal close to noon. I like feeling the sense of place in this Gothic interior. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support because of the blown highlights. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Belgium

File:Mehrfamilienhaus – Herrnhuter Straße 1 (Leipzig) – Fenster mit historischem Rolladen.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2023 at 12:45:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created by August Geyler - uploaded by August Geyler| - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 12:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August Geyler (talk) 12:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting (such old roller shutters with chains are really rare nowadays in Germany) and good technical quality. The lateral light which emphasizes the structure of the façade and the effective composition make it a FP to me. Beauty of decay … --Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support A very beautiful picture. The weathering is well taken. However, with such images there is what I would prefer: black and white. The color is rather inconsequential in this image, black and white could still clearly emphasize the structures. --XRay 💬 10:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas - plus, I actually really like the color in this image. The muted tones of brown fit the mood of decay. --Kritzolina (talk) 11:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder what's behind this blind -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 452640 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the color, too ... it's not one you associate with Germany, more like the Middle East, a perception reinforced by the weathered look. I also think you could crop the sides in to get rid of that distracting shadow (see note). Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you. I'm struggling with your suggestion to crop it that much. It would delete parts I like because they are showing the structure of the façade. --August Geyler (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Your call Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that you don't get it - I also don't get every nominated image. But do you have an actual reason to oppose? For me this kind of comment is very confusing. There are lots of things I don't understand, but if others who understand them find them valid and worthy, I respect their opinion, as long as I don't have a clear reason to object. Kritzolina (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to explain without being rude. I think it is a poor composition of a mundane subject. Can it have architectural interest? - surely it would have been preserved. There is no 'natural decay'. Someone has recently slapped fresh mortar on the wall and some has gone on the metallener Verblendung at the top of the window. Looking on Google Maps Street View, there were much more 'original' walls and shutters to photograph. The top of the image is not in focus. The crop at the bottom is either too tight or not tight enough. The shadow at the left is distracting. Sorry. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for going through the effort of trying to not be rude. I understand how this can be difficult and time consuming, especially if one lists all the things one is not fully happy with. But how about adding just one or two of these points (e.g. Top not in focus, not ideal crop at the bottom, distracting shadow) to your objections, instead of the generic and arbitrary sounding "I don't get it"? I think that would help the nominator, photographer, but also the other persons discussing the image. Thank you again! Kritzolina (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

File:Agfa F28mm ver 01 02.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 12:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical devices
Info Photographic lens AGFA COLOR MULTI-COATED 1:2.8 f=28 mm (front view). All by me -- LexKurochkin (talk) 12:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LexKurochkin (talk) 12:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would clean the lens, use a different support surface and eliminate distracting reflections. There are many FPs to guide you. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw my nomination I see. Thanks for the review. --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:20230211 Chiara Kreuzer 850 6878.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2023 at 16:12:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by Granada -- Granada (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like taking portraits and as often the best ones are the snapshot kind of photos. She was in talk to her family with me standing aside waiting for a good shot (far away enough to not hear her talk) and in the right moment she took a look over in direction of the ski jumping arena and click! Gotcha! -- Granada (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 19:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, appealing and authentic portrait. --Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 477868 02:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best contemporary portrait photographs of a woman we've had here in a long time. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support +1 to that! --El Grafo (talk) 11:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Geoffroy's spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) Peten.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2023 at 17:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Atelidae (Howler, Spider and Woolly Monkeys)
Info An IUCN endangered monkey. No FPs of this family of New World monkeys. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The leaves look weird with a blue outline -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yeah, can you do something about the haloes on the leaves? Good focus to the monkey, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will sort later today, thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain Some halos removed, others are still there. Notes added. I don't know how this image was done technically, with which post-processing -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To my eye these look like the kind of artifacts Topaz PhotoAI provides respectivley enhances if they are already there. I like PhotoAI a lot, but it cannot do magic to lens errors of some kind. --Granada (talk) 06:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance to review the original shot maybe? -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The halos are there in the RAW file. Not the fault of Topaz this time. Halos often result from subjects taken looking up into a bright sky. I used a mixture of clone, blur and paint brush tools to remove them, but obviously the result isn't good enough. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)

File:Frühlings-Knotenblume (Leucojum vernum)-20230220-RM-161056.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2023 at 20:43:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae
Info Flower of spring marigold (Leucojum vernum) photographed in a garden in Bamberg. Focus stack of 32 images. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very sharp! --Granada (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 475440 02:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special light. Blown highlight at the top, but too minor to nitpick -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 02:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae

File:Acanthocardia tuberculata shell.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2023 at 16:36:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells
Info created by Mister rf - uploaded by Mister rf - nominated by Mister rf -- Mister rf (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs a contrasting background that works on Llez's shells. Is this an artificial (replaced) background? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for informing me. The background was classic white, but it can also be changed to black, here we are. However, I'll consider to withdraw my nomination, that is not my field of expertise.ː) Regards, Mister rf (talk) 00:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no rule to say you can't have an artificial background. I just don't like them! Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Mister rf (talk) 06:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lighthouse in Paphos Cyprus 2016 Nov.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2023 at 17:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Cyprus
Info Lighthouse in Paphos, Cyprus, Nov 2016, created and uploaded by LexKurochkin - nominated by User:LexKurochkin -- LexKurochkin (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LexKurochkin (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good focus on the lighthouse, but very dull light. Isn't it too dark for 13:55:24? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Ikan that the light is a bit dull and the contrast is overall too low. I have tried to edit the photo: here is a first attempt which adds a bit more contrast etc. @LexKurochkin: If you like it, you are free to use my version (I can upload it if you want), or you can take it as inspiration if you want to improve the photo yourself, … just as you want! :–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aristeas' edit is more punchy, but that bleak patch of dirt in the foreground is still overpowering. It looks much nicer in the spring, when the fields are green and filled with daisies: [1] --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ikan, Aristeas thanks for the review and the inspiration photo :) I'll try to reprocess the image from the original raw file this weekend in a way you recommended. Thanks a lot! --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ikan Kekek: , @Aristeas: , @Julesvernex2: Done. The image was completely reprocessed from DNG, I also narrowed crop a little to reduce visible impact of ground near the lighthouse. --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The background is still unappealingly dark and gray to me. I guess that's just how that day was. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Another attempt - new version uploaded. Well, I think it is close to the maximum we can afford without going far from "encyclopedic value" of the image --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping at it, LexKurochkin. I prefer Aristeas' more contrasty edit, but that's of course a matter of taste. In any case, getting it to FP level seems like an uphill battle, as the conditions were not ideal that day. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this completely, on all counts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks a lot for interesting and quite useful reviews and discussion. --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ocellated turkey (Meleagris ocellata) male Peten.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2023 at 17:35:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phasianidae (Grouse, Partridges, Peafowl, Pheasants, Quail, Turkeys)
Info An IUCN near-threatened poseur who suffers (I am told) by being very tasty. One existing turkey FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Never tasted this poultry, but beautiful feathers. Photographically compelling focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 05:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even more beautiful than the wild turkeys I've seen in Upstate New York. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to the other turkey-fancier! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 09:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is a fun one, looks like he's posing just for the camera --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. --Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Phasianidae (Grouse, Partridges, Peafowl, Pheasants, Quail, Turkeys)

Vaduz Castle, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2023 at 15:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Vaduz Castle, facade to the mountain
Vaduz Castle, facade to Vaduz

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Liechtenstein
Info Both main facades of the Vaduz Castle. All by me --A.Savin 15:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:40, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Liechtenstein

File:View West of Hartz Mountain.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 09:09:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
Info A view of Hartz Lake and the Arthurs Range from Hartz Peak in Hartz Mountains National Park, Tasmania, Australia. Created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 - SHB2000 (talk) 09:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support While I'm not in love with those shadows, I appreciate the 5-km trek (one way) to reach this peak that JJ Harrison has taken (while it's certainly not that much, at least for my standards), it's relatively minor, IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 11:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The clouds in the upper right part are looking a bit overexposed to me. --Milseburg (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:30, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania

File:Geoffroy's spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) Peten 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 10:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Atelidae (Howler, Spider and Woolly Monkeys)
Info Another of the same endangered species. Sitting in a tree beside a number of Epiphytes (No - that's not an epiphyte on its head). All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I liked the pose and use of the prehensile tail more in your other nom, but this one deserves a feature to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The sharpness is not the best, but an FP to me for the unusual motif and the good compo Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco a poco. --Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 16:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Atelidae (Howler, Spider and Woolly Monkeys)

File:Saksun, Faroe Islands.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2023 at 16:40:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Faroe Islands
Info created by MiroRosa - uploaded by MiroRosa - nominated by Jan.Kamenicek -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
MiroRosa, is there any way to get more on the right side? I don't like that the road is clipped. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek, you are right, I have replaced with new image. MiroRosa (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just pinging @Ikan Kekek: --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I still don't like that the house in the upper right is cropped, but it may be impossible to avoid cropping everything. It's an interesting picture. The colors are unusual, but that's probably unique to the Faroes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sun may not shine very often here, but the light is very subdued. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The white balance seems too blue, or the green oversaturated, or both. Yann (talk) 19:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Indeed. In the two previous versions the while balance was warmer, which was IHMO more appealing. Wouldn’t the new version be better with the warmer white balance of the earlier versions? --Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose per Yann and Charles. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposes; the sky also just seems too dull and the scenery as a whole does not stand out. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann and Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. This is exactly what I thought, when reviewing this in the first place. Still a high quality screen saver.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 139-141 HDR.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2023 at 09:14:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fine quality but why the crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, why not? it was a photographer choice. I've different views of the Atomium with and without crop. I wouldn't haver probably nominated this version of the Atomium at first, but the perspective is also interesting. Poco a poco (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but this crop doesn't work for me. I would like to see a crop like this or this. -- Ivar (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Yep, and the second one you linked above would probably get my vote if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I also think this crop doesn't work for this structure.--Peulle (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Awkward crop in my view. Agree with Ivar -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the creative composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have absolutely no problem with the crop. The near-semicircles work just as well compositionally; in fact I bet leaving them whole would have made any ensuing crop look painfully tight.
I really like the sci-fi film feel of this ... in fact, I realized why: this suggests a rear view of the typical Star Trek starship design. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As a confessing Roddenberry fan, I agree with Daniel's statement. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop should be wider. NightWolf1223 (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel, and it makes me see the Atomium as I have never seen it before. --Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azurite - New Nevada Lode, La Sal, Utah, USA.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 17:49:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info all by Ivar (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 10:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool. Guess Yves Klein would have liked that mineral … ;–). -- Aristeas (talk) 10:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 08:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Only WOW :-) -- Ra'ike T C 18:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

File:Inukshuk Park 05.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2023 at 00:00:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info The Inukshuk, a sculpture made up of piled stones, is a familiar symbol of the Inuit, mostly found in the Arctic landscape and often used as a navigational tool. All by Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice composition. But I suggest fixing that halo effect between object and sky. --August Geyler (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Augustgeyler: Thanks for the suggestion, tried to fix it manually. How is it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Well, the darker sky gave more drama to the scene. But it's definitely better without the halo effect.--August Geyler (talk) 21:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your suggestion, geo code added. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 20:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 475466 02:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know ... I've seen and photographed quite a few inuksuit, in Canada and down here, and this one just doesn't stand out (in fact, it's hard to photograph one in a way that really makes it seem like you've never seen one before, even if you genuinely haven't, that might be part of the idea). Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Thanks for your honest opinion, actually you are right. This was my first time seeing an inuksuk. Though this inuksuk stands out among others because of its height which is almost 30 feet making it one of the tallest Inuksuit in the whole world (The inuksuit can be as large as 6 to 7 feet in height - per "Parks Canada Directory of Federal Heritage Designations"). Though there are few in North America, I doubt many people know about them. I even asked my school teachers who were unaware of the Toronto inuksuit. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 06:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]
Large inuksuit, you mean? Because there are plenty in North America, on both sides of the border. This is my photo that includes the 'suk at the Explorer Hotel in Yellowknife. Down here, there's the one at the Canadian embassy in Washington. And then someone built one one dry summer in a river near where I live.
I was thinking there might not be any in Mexico, but I was wrong. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: The govt. website stated them as 'Large' you can check [2] . I tried to find out if there is any list of the tallest inuksuit, but I couldn't find any except the tallest to be 37 feet. Though they range in size from .5 meters (1.6 ft) 2 meters (6.6 ft) in height and up to 2 meters (6.6 ft) in width (per paragraph 7 ). So, this 30 feet tall inukshuk is definitely rare.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials

File:Teide Peak Fumes.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2023 at 15:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain
Info created by Imehling - uploaded by Imehling - nominated by Imehling -- Imehling (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Imehling (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just doesn't stand out. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you be a little bit more specific? --Imehling (talk) 06:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The foreground is not that interesting to look at - it's mostly the same color, with a little steam - and there is not enough background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Die Woche Der Tag von Potsdam cover.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2023 at 09:14:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper
Info Created by Klaus Richter (1919), issued by Die Woche (1933) - reproduced, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and interesting.--Peulle (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~Oddly there's a black line all around except at the top~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The frame is clearly visible on my screen, also at the top. Nevertheless, I can enlarge it if necessary. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Display problem at thumbnail size, sorry. Comment fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks anyway. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

High resolution of a historical document, but I think the license should be public domain (rather than CC 4.0), because the author died in 1948, more than 70 years ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, free licence now. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author died in 1948, then {{PD-old-70}}, isn't it? -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

70 years are included IMO, as it says 100 years or less. Anyway, I changed it again. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for the correction. (100 years means he died before 1923.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 465137 01:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper

File:Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2023 at 06:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Belgium
Info Pipe organ of the Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula, Brussels, Belgium. The Gothic church is dedicated to the patron saints of the City of Brussels, and is considered to be one of the finest examples of Brabantine Gothic architecture. Its construction began in the 11th century as a Romanesque church, replacing an earlier chapel, and was largely complete in its current form by the 16th century, though its interior was frequently modified in the following centuries. The large pipe organ in the nave was inaugurated in October 2000. It hangs as a swallow's nest organ at the level of the triforium, and has a total of 4300 pipes, 63 stops, 4 keyboards and the pedal-board. This instrument is the work of the German organ-builder Gerhard Grenzing, in collaboration with the English architect Simon Platt. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 01:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A magnificent church organ. --Aristeas (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I assume there's no copyright problem with a photograph of this recently created and inaugurated organ? Please add information about the organ to the file description, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an issue in Belgium, description added to the file --Poco a poco (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know Belgium has freedom of panorama, but I do not know whether that extends to interiors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How come you consider a pipe organ a copyrighted object? --A.Savin 17:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are musical instruments with this variable a shape not copyrightable in Belgium because they are considered tools? I don't know because I don't know Belgian law, but I certainly wouldn't assume there could be no copyright on a clearly visually distinctive musical instrument design. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly under US law (which also matters) it's possible the shape would be ineligible for copyright as a useful article. Do we know when the organ gained its present design? Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was "inaugurated" in 2000. That's all it says in w:Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Musical instruments

File:Vierhouterbos (Staatsbosbeheer). 14-02-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2023 at 17:08:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info To me, this is a simple yet balanced and soothing shot of a beech forest with an inviting path and nice grazing light from the left.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wouldn't have included the trunk on the right. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in favor of the alternate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The trunk on the right creates a different vibe. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support preferring this version. --Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image of some trees (only part of them). No any reason for FP nomination, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 02:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is not outstanding for me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CommentThe incidence of light makes the photo attractive to me.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Midday light? -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12:23:04 in the winter.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Support This makes a big difference, and I didn't realize it would. Thanks for suggesting this crop, Charles! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is not outstanding for me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the texture. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one looks better to me --Llez (talk) 07:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The same reason as above, image of some trees (only part of them). -- Karelj (talk) 08:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (1).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2023 at 12:05:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway
Info A photo with a chill mood, an icy fjord impacting against the land. Created, uploaded and nominated by Peulle, for your consideration. -- Peulle (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Peulle (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Do you have another shot without man-made shore defences (if that's what we see)? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have one image with a different composition, I could nominate that later. --Peulle (talk) 10:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Blurry foreground, impacting the composition. At ISO 100 this narrow depth of field could have been avoided with a smaller aperture. Also the light is harsh and the background hazy. Useful document but not a spectacular shot in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support To give this photo a little love: I like the chill mood, and I really like how the ice (nature) is pressed against the (man-made) shore defences … one could even take this as an allegory ;–). This photo’s charm is reserved, but it is there. --Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bessen van een Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. 28-02-2023. (d.j.b).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2023 at 17:41:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
Info Berries of an Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Niger'. Focus stack of 15 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question is the original background digitally replaced? If so, there should be info about that on the descrption page. Color of the pedicle edge (light blue) doesn't match with the background colour. -- Ivar (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Answer: Everything about the photo is purely natural and made in the garden.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral postprocessing has left sharp edges on the plant. -- Ivar (talk) 06:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If you look closely at the stem (of ~1.5mm thickness) you will see vertical veins on the stem. The bottom grain is a palpably sharp edge that probably reflects some light. (The unedited photo has the same border).--Famberhorst (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you say 'purely natural', do you mean that no man-made background was used please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: yes, that's what I mean. It's a natural background.--Famberhorst (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Something seems not quite right. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 469517 01:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks good to me. And nice green background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Some weirdness on the reflections at the top of some of the berries. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae

File:Bloem van een narcis tete a tete (Narcissus). 01-03-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 15:49:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family Amaryllidaceae.
Info Hoarfrost on a flower of a daffodil tete a tete (Narcissus). Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think we can expect a more interesting composition, with cleaner background, for such a common flower. The hoarfrost is minimal. The stacking has a major error. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a high resolution picture in my view. Cluttered background, blurry greenery and I find the angle of view unattractive -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Thank you for your response. My question: what do you mean by high resolution photo?--Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

4,608 × 3,456 pixels -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I thought you meant this is a single photo. But this is a stacked photo of 16 exposures of the flower bud and flower stalk of a small daffodil variety. These stood in groups under the trees along a path. If you want to photograph a flower separately, you always get the leaves of the other daffodils in the background. I deliberately blurred this one as much as possible by only stacking the flower bud so that you involve the natural background in the photo. You don't have to like that, but this way of photographing is common in magazines about flowers and plants.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found in magazines much more appealing specimens. The stem of this one seems rather slack -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are photos of cultivated potted plants. We call this 'comparing apples and oranges'.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, you are comparing your picture to magazines, not me. These are your tags. Now feel free to improve your description in case it lacks accuracy -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Dull light and busy background, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative, another version edit

Oppose The background is still cluttered, and the angle unattractive in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus plexippus) Piedra Herrada 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2023 at 18:49:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info The Monarch butterfly migration is one of the World's natural wonders. The monarchs overwinter in Mexico in a number of areas covering about seven hectares in total. The butterfly density is said to range from 10-50 million butterflies per hectare. Most roost in oyamel fir trees. If it's a sunny day, they sun themselves on bushes and fly off in search of water. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love that you have a pretty sharp capture of a flying butterfly in the frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 21:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 471051 07:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Protaetic cuprea ignicollis 2023-03-22 IZE-066.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2023 at 17:12:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info created by Dr. Zachi Evenor - uploaded by MathKnight - nominated by MathKnight -- MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 17:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 17:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This might be more suited to a nomination at QI (Quality Images). Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I haven't decided, but it looks like a legitimate FPC candidate to me. And no FPs in this species. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Basile. I don’t think we should make image stacking mandatory for such photos – when the DoF is placed well (as here), enough of the little creature is sharp and the transitions between sharp and unsharp appear natural and clean. --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light and the colors work togther extremely well in this composition and I agree with Aristeas that the DoF is placed just right. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 473676 07:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:CH.GR.Arosa Tschuggen-Grand-Hotel 2220 16x9-R 16K.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2023 at 00:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
Info Spa at Tschuggen Grand Hotel in Arosa, Switzerland · created by Roy Egloff - uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August Geyler (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice architecture and good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a nice photo, but is it a problem that we can very clearly see identifiable people, or should they expect to be photographed, since they are in a building without shades or shutters? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though I do share similar concerns as Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We don't downsize, but this might be an exception, though it's too late now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really very nice mood, one of those rare shots that make me "want to be there right here & now". And I don't see any problems: clearly COM:De minimis which of course applies for people too, otherwise we had to delete nearly all street photography. --A.Savin 22:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well, you nominated a bunch of street photographs for deletion on the basis that people walking on the street had a right to privacy, but that was in Germany, so perhaps Switzerland has different laws. Anyway, if you're OK with this photo, I guess it's fine, and none of the people shown in the photo are naked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Those photos are close-up "hidden camera" shots of identifiable people, taken on purpose, quite obvously. Disappointing statements of yours. --A.Savin 14:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why disappointing? I'm saying if this photo that also shows several obviously identifiable people who are not walking on the street but inside a spa and viewed through glass is OK with you, that's probably enough of a reason to feel that it's fine. I get the distinction you're making, though, which is between individuals as the subject of photos or as part of a picture of a building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally somebody making good use of the wonderful GFX100S. --Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm sure that, at some point in the future, this will be used in a Bond film or something like it as the top-secret facility or villain's lair that the hero(es) has/ve to break into. Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland

File:Cepaea nemoralis Paarung-20230314-RM-110511.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 11:25:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
InfoCepaea nemoralis var. castanea concolor and grove snail (Cepaea nemoralis) mating. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. What will the offspring's shells be likely to look like? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: The answer you find here, if you download the full text pdf --Llez (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose solid shot, but it feels more like a QI+VI or en.wikipedia FP territory to me. --El Grafo (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just in the right moment --Llez (talk) 08:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Llez vs. El Grafo ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose per El Grafo. QI+VI, yes. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 459642 01:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. -- Karelj (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have so many FPs of groups of five empty shells on a black background that it's only right that we have one with the creatures actually in those shells. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose With El Grafo. --August Geyler (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Gastropoda

File:Brückenportal der Nydeggbrücke.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 13:19:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Switzerland
Info created by August Geyler - uploaded by August Geyler - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August Geyler (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As I said at VIC, I don't like the close crop and partially obscured arch. this image shows more of the bridge and is a more pleasing composition, though less detailed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition is working for me. --Milseburg (talk) 19:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Charles on this one, sorry. --Peulle (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Puelle. -- Karelj (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe not that good as a photo of the bridge, but the point is in the composition which combines the two bridges and the framing effect of the arch to a very interesting view. --Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Interesting light but I find the left side cluttered and the dead branches unaesthetic -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Michielverbeek (talk) 06:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Milseburg and Aristeas. The vegetation on the left side do not disturb too much, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The top bugs me and it feels to me like a ceiling that cuts off eye motion. I might have supported a photo that showed the top of the bridge along with the rest of this composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A near miss, per Basile and Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --El Grafo (talk) 07:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 466701 07:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST90E40ZL1 MCU.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 15:04:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded by Mister rf - nominated by Mister rf -- Mister rf (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. I'm not sure why it is presented with a tilt, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Through these photos I took, macro/extreme macro, I try to emphasize the three-dimensional qualities of that object in the frame, to reveal elements that are otherwise not perceived by the viewer. It would be much simpler to make the classic version, fewer photos are needed, even without stacking, sometimes even one is enough, because a large DoF is not needed, and therefore the elimination of some processing stages, saves time, but some information is lost IMO.

Here’s the same microcontroller, in a “scanner” view perspective. Mister rf (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea of looking at it from behind, for exactly the reasons you state. The thing I'm questioning is tilting is to the side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good. (IMHO the lateral tilting adds a bit of tension/suspense/… to the image, the photo could appear a bit too clinical without it.) --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment impressive quality indeed, but something about it subconsciously feels wrong and unnatural about this - and given the surprisingly low amount of votes, I think others might have a similar problem. It's not the tilt, though, at least not on its own. I think it may be the brightness gradient of the artificial background not not being consistent with the frontal lighting of the subject. As boring as it is, I think I'd prefer a flat and neutral background for this kind of shot. --El Grafo (talk) 15:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your input, any remarks/observations can help me improve my photography techniques. As suggested, here's a version where I've removed the background.
Mister rf (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both ok for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
seeing the alternative, this is now indeed an Oppose for me. --El Grafo (talk) 12:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Info Alternative file, a retouched picture with background removed. --Mister rf (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This works much better for me. --El Grafo (talk) 07:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both ok for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:52, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support also. Yann (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for both. --Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for both. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support also for both--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 458469 07:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC))[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

The chosen alternative is: File:ST90E40ZL1 (2).png

File:Wiesen Pippau (Crepis biennis)-20220624-RM-123950.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2023 at 18:34:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Cichorioideae
Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination.--Ermell (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mister rf (talk) 22:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blooming -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Viewing from it's quality: gold + it's a flower + it's the best sounding plant with a saxonian accent = instant FP.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support good contrast and light, but some yellow "haloes" left by stacking program. -- Ivar (talk) 12:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Cichorioideae

File:Hubble NGC6530.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2023 at 18:11:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by ESA/Hubble & NASA - uploaded by Liandrei - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 18:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 455462 07:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question It looks very nice, but this is NASA we're talking about... Couldn't we get something with a really impressive resolution?--Peulle (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 12:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

File:CH.ZG.Zug View from Guggi 01 16x9+R 8192x4608 Br058 gp denoising Br075.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2023 at 07:55:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
Info The old town of Zug (Switzerland) at blue hour. Created and uploaded by Roy Egloff, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful blue-hour photo; thanks to the snow it appears almost as in a fairy story. --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As beautiful and still it looks as messy and ugly it's named.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The filename is not optimal, of course, but at least it is descriptive (starting with country code and canton code, it contains the name of the city and even the point of view). The extra stuff added at the end is indeed a bit irritating, but probably it’s useful for the creator (e.g. because he has a whole bunch of related files on disk and the filename helps to identify which one was uploaded). On Commons we usually respect the personal filename schemes of contributors as long as the filenames are unique, more or less descriptive, and don’t contain offensive stuff. Therefore I see no grounds to rename the file in accordance with the rather restrictive Commons file renaming policy (see Commons:File renaming). --Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I didn't claimed renaming the file. I just wanted to share my opinion on this odd contrast, but I fully respect the file CH.ZG.Zug View from Guggi 01,... and stuff.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Sorry if my reply sounded harsh! --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special atmosphere and appealing lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! -- Ivar (talk) 12:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support All it needs is the stacks of money these people are saving in taxes . Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland

File:Catedral de San Florián, Vaduz, Liechtenstein, 2022-10-23, DD 38-40 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2023 at 06:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Cathedral of St. Florin, Vaduz, Liechtenstein. The neo-Gothic church was originally a parish church but held the status of cathedral in 1997 and is now the centre of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vaduz. It was built in 1874 by Friedrich von Schmidt on the site of earlier medieval foundations. Its patron saint is Florinus of Remüs (Florin), a 9th-century saint of the Vinschgau Valley. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the composition has some disbalance towards the vault, and also this cathedral itself has actually limited wow IMHO. --A.Savin 22:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the first part of the feedback. I believe that the columns offer a nice framing. I've seen richer churches, yes, but this is the nicest one in the country and per the comments below. --Poco a poco (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Savin.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the most impressive cathedral ever, of course, but the light makes this an impressive photo to me. --Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Worth it for the altar, and especially the stained glass windows and colored light streaming through them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 469279 01:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:10, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not a fan of this baroque styled symetrical framed pictures but I too think, that the light in the choir in this particular moment makes it special.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 21:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Keel-billed toucan (Ramphastos sulfuratus sulfuratus) on foxtail palm (Wodyetia bifurcata) Cayo.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2023 at 14:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
Info One FP of the toucan family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be sharper, but it's nonetheless impressive.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 19:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 454915 07:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing Lotje (talk) 12:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educational. Identified animal + food -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and colourful photo, would make a good poster. --Aristeas (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Busy but with color like this who can resist? Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support a nice shot. But the background dominates, which I find very disturbing.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks overprocessed to me, there are e.g. white halos around some berries. A lot of AI in the picture, I guess. Poco a poco (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)

File:Bossee-2022-msu-3392-.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2023 at 16:04:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Schleswig-Holstein
Info created & uploaded by Matthias Süßen – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty static and centered but hell of lighting and a nice reflection Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anyone who gets up that early... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 22:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice composition but Oversaturated in my view. Same aspect as this one. The post-treatment has gone too far in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The color of the water through the gap of the wooden planks of the pontoon is much lighter than around. Also the lower right corner of the photograph is plain white -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it is. I did a check and the gaps look lighter because of the white halo around the planks. Bottom right resulted from tilt correction and should be sorted. The image possibly has a lot of post-processing though. Charlesjsharp (talk)

Possibly a selective filter was applied in the sky + reflection (except in the portion located in center of the pontoon). I also find the intensity of the yellows & purples too garish -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The colors in this photo seem plausible to me; the ones in the photo you linked, less so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One thing is certain: this image is heavily processed. One doesn't get this kind of shot directly from the camera, even if by luck the sky was breathtakingly exceptional. Now the question is how far? And was this post-treatment too far from reality? By experience at FPC, it's often a question of tolerance until which point the sliders are still acceptable according to the subject. While some of us consider they've been moved over the maximum , other people sometimes think "yes but the scenery is worth it" (example). In that case, the aspect is "Instagram-like" to me. Unrealistic. I'm not saying it's all fake, but saturated enough for me to miss the "wow" factor, and too far in my opinion for this picture to be sorted in a gallery called "Natural" -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but I supported the other photo you linked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're perfectly entitled to follow your own tastes But personally in front of such images I feel "this is a special processing" rather than "this is a special landscape". -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mister rf (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --I second Ikan on the plausibility of the colors. I live in this part of Germany and we sometimes do have incredible lights with flamboyant colors.Dinkum (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Matthias, would you like to address the question of how much saturation you used in post-processing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry. I'm on the road and (once again) don't have access to the file. As far as I remember, the image is an exposure bracketing of three images. I stitched them together in Lightroom and chose Landscape as profile. I did not work with masks at that time. AFAIK I did not increase the saturation. The sunrise was indeed spectacular. —Matthias Süßen (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and enjoy your trip! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there are 3 PICTURES stitched together, that would be useful to mention this in the file description, possibly with ~~{{Retouched}}~~ {{HDR image}}. After all, a HDR composition is a kind of photomontage.

We don't know from which image comes the public exif data, but the hidden exif data indicates there is at least 1 mask applied.

Shadows +95%, Highlights -83%, Luminance 87% and vibrance 20%. There are many more modifications, but that's enough to create an

artificial aspect in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the template HDR -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm with Basile on this one. The slammed highlights, pulled shadows and punchy colours seem like a throwback to the early days of HDR. I'm sure the scene looked beautiful in person, but there's just not enough dynamic range on an 8-bit JPEG to do it justice --Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Red seems to me to have been reduced during post-processing, which is why it looks unnatural. But it is still good.--Ermell (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It may have been heavily processed, per the EXIF data, but other than the foreground vegetation looking lighter than it normally does in such images (which, in this case, frankly leaves it looking like ... exactly what we'd see with our own eyes standing there) it's perfectly OK for me. It looks "artificial" only by the standards of what we usually get out of photographs. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure we would see vegetation as bright as the sky, Daniel. Our eyes can dynamically adapt to a scene and our brains can composite images, meaning we are able to perceive 20+ stops of light. On the other hand, an 8-bit JPEG can show only up to 10 stops, depending on the applied gamma curve. While I don’t think we should limit photography to what our eyes see, personally I don’t find this image aesthetically pleasing. —Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 452159 07:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Schleswig-Holstein

File:Calle Santa Isabel in Toledo. Spain.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2023 at 11:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
Info created & uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I get the idea, but the figure could be more suitable - i.e. no plastic shopping bag. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I love such narrow alley shots, especially when they direct the view towards some interesting building, but Charles is right, it’s a pity about that plastic bac … --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't mind that bag at all. Sure, you wouldn't want that on a post card. But if you look at it as street photography, it provides a great, disenchanting counter point to the post card idyll. --El Grafo (talk) 07:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support Looks like a National Geographic cover. I would prefer to have less CA, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 474685 07:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Spain

File:Trifolium spadiceum - Niitvälja.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2023 at 12:24:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 12:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good lighting. --August Geyler (talk) 22:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Der Angemeldete (talk) 19:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 453318 07:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed and high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support great shot as always. what bugs me a bit are the green (halos?) around the top petals and the white vertical part of the stem on the right side.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae