Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 17:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info A fisherman at Muzhappilangad beach.
All by Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support POTY 2024 finalist. ★ 17:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Outstanding scene. But the sky shows colour banding and I am not happy with the fact that this nomination is giving no EXIF data about the camera used and is only provided at 9.8 megapixels. --August (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Everything is fixed. Now please consider --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- August, By considering your suggestions I have made some changes. Is it OK? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Thank you for editing! The image was improved slightly. It has some more detail and proper EXIF data now. But the colour banding is still visible in the form a pixelated parts at the sky. Additionally it is cropped intensively from 21 megapixels down to 11.6 megapixels. So all in all I really love the scene with its composition and light, but technicaly this image might have trouble even becoming Quality Image so I can sadly not consider it FP.
- August (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- August, By considering your suggestions I have made some changes. Is it OK? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Everything is fixed. Now please consider --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Benji 16:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 16:57:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Palaemonidae_(Palaemonids)
- Info Glass anemone shrimp (Periclimenes brevicarpalis), Zanzibar, Tanzania. It's usually between 0.5 to 1 inch (1.3 to 2.5 cm) long and can be found in the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans, including Australia. This species lives symbiotically with sea anemones, corals and jelly fish. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive, given the size. Yann (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! --Tagooty (talk) 09:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 10:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support A sort of illusion! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Transparency is fascinating. I wonder how the organs work. Imagine people transparent too :-) Basile Morin (talk) 00:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support You certainly captured why the species is so named. At full resolution you can really appreciate the species adaptations. But when zoomed out you really don't know what you are looking at. Its got an exponential wow factor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 06:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 19:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Overexposure
- Info created and uploaded by Rapapas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Intentional overexposure is also a valid technique! -- ★ 19:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Intentional blue hue, too? -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're right. I I withdraw my nomination since the door is green, not blue (I've already visited the church in February and I didn't remember the color). ★ 22:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 01:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Myocastoridae (Nutrias)
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very detailed and nice pose. --Tagooty (talk) 12:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Tagooty--Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 04:37:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
- Info Flower buds of a Agapanthus praecox Snow White. A pure white dwarf, 45 cm. Focus stack of 50 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support For the composition, also. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 06:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The impression is very harmonious; Good technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpness, good composition. --Tagooty (talk) 05:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Harlock81 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Die Tote von Niederpöring, Museum Quintana.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 21:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones and fossils#Family : Hominidae
- Info created by Mosbatho - uploaded by Mosbatho - nominated by Mosbatho -- Msb (talk) 21:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Msb (talk) 21:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Info Gallery updated -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Strong vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think it is because it is illuminated by a spotlight. C messier (talk) 11:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, though this spot produces a very harsh light with strong shadows -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Böttgersäule in Pavlův Studenec (CZ).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 21:42:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info created by Mosbatho - uploaded by Mosbatho - nominated by Mosbatho -- Msb (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Msb (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the top part of the stele is missing focus. --A.Savin 09:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin. -- Karelj (talk) 11:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Very interesting item, beautiful autumn scenery and very appropriate (namely somewhat melancholic) light/atmosphere, but I agree that the inscription on the stele should be in focus because it is the main focus of the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 13:41:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
- Info Old picture of a young cat with big eyes (no longer among us). In my (probably biased) opinion, the previous assessment was unfair. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would like to know if the cat survived. Nice meme --Wilfredor (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Info Mya died in 2015. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- desculpa nao sabia, meus sentimentos pela sua gata Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Info Mya died in 2015. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose "At least the chin shouldn't be cropped" was a pretty fair judgment, in my opinion. It also seems that the flash fired, which creates an artificial harsh light. Maybe this nomination / renomination is more based on a sentimental affect, if this cat was a personal pet? That could bias the subjective emotional impact of the picture? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cute, but still commons and no wow, not even the best quality (see unfocused nose). --A.Savin 20:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Alvesgaspar (talk) 06:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:40:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Intentional motion blur
- Info Example of the Motion blur effect applied to a Ferris wheel photography. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 22:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support For the effort to create some original work. -- ★ 22:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 17:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Now wow, sorry. Small resolution, for a composite photo (only 2000x3100 pixels each), harsh light due to dark night, blown highlights in the center, broken file page with an unknown template displayed in red, and uncalibrated color space. Also significantly bad framing, as some nacelles are cut out at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 11:49:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Carduoideae
- Info created by Le Commissaire - uploaded by Le Commissaire - nominated by Mickaël en résidence -- Mickaël en résidence (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mickaël en résidence (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Good focus, pleasing aesthetic, and the bees are abuzzing. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Airbus A310 - F-WNOV AirZeroG at LFBT airport.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 18:33:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Airliners
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment High level of detail but lead room missing in my view. Very tight crop at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm taking as reference pictures uploaded on [1]https://www.planespotters.net/ or [2]https://www.jetphotos.com/ where pictures' crop are very tight. So it is very usual to have this kind of picture with narrow crop for aicraft. I totally understand that it can be considered a lack a lead room but in my view, the picture represents only the object itself, not really the fact that he is landing on a runway. If you think that the picture will be more interesting, I can enlarge the crop and change ratio from 2:3 to 16:9. If I keep original ratio, I will have airport fences at the bottom of the picture. Shougissime (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the crop is way too tight, and the overall image isn't compelling. An attractive sky or background, or dramatic lighting or angles are important for an FP of an airplane. I would crop fairly tightly behind the plane, but give it some room in front, the same way you've done for pictures of bicyclists. You don't need to crop to a particular ratio, do what's best for the image. I wouldn't use Jetphotos or Planespotters as guides for featured content on Commons. Acroterion (talk) 21:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for feedback. Some pictures of airplanes are FP with a blue sky
and with a tight crop File:American Airlines Boeing 777-200ER N775AN PVG 2013-5-21.png or this one File:Korean Air Boeing 777-200ER HL7526 SVO 2011-6-17.pngFile:Lufthansa_Airbus_A320-211_D-AIQT_01.jpg, I can't really understand the issue with my picture if it has been already accepted in the past for the blue sky. Why this picture can't be accepted so? I will add some lead room at the nose of the aircraft. Shougissime (talk) 13:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for feedback. Some pictures of airplanes are FP with a blue sky
- Info None of your examples is FP. VI is different. But the new version is better IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- I did a mistake, corrected. Shougissime (talk) 13:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's a much better crop. My comments about composition and backgrounds remain. This is a good picture of an aircraft about to land, but not an FP. Acroterion (talk) 01:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info None of your examples is FP. VI is different. But the new version is better IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose tight crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Bird sex - Two copulating ducks showing a corkscrew penis inserted in a cloaca in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 01:27:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info Educational, in my opinion. Luckily, male and female sexual organs are both visible. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sex tape released :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The main downside is the heads of both animals are out of focus. The visible reproductive organs mostly make up for the downside IMO. Now to scrub this off of my search history... --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. Aperture F/10 and time 1 /250 s is the maximum combination I could get here, and only 100 mm focal length. Going closer would have scared the birds. Focus was of course intentional -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have told people about the corkscrew fallus, this image offers proof. As I understand it, the mallard's has barbs on it. It not a pretty picture, so to speak, but it documents something rarely observed, and the image brings into clear and sharp detail the evolution of a duck's fallus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, having browsed through the categories, I noticed we have incredibly few images of this type, and even fewer quality images. I totally agree this one will never make a poster for a living room :-) But it's also original and perhaps more educational than a bunch of solitary ducks walking or swimming on a pond. Thank you very much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting and good documentation but I don't believe this is one of our finest images (in terms of subject, ligthing, detail, compo), sorry, Basile, Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty rare capture. The focused area is very sharp etc. The light is not thrilling, but it is favourable insofar as it avoids harsh shadows (which would obscure the, hem, private parts). And it’s unavoidable that the subjects look away. We have promoted misc. bird photos etc. of rather mediocre quality because of the rarity of the species; hence we should promote this rare scene, too. – Aristeas (talk) 13:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I understand Poco's concerns but this is a rare capture that I think the wow factor triumphs all else. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Giving my support so this incredible sex scene can be promoted. Wolverine XI 08:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 05:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United States
- Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting historical subject --Wilfredor (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support That one building in the lower right is remarkably well preserved. ;) Well exposed image that documents a historically significant site. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support In this case even the visitors are helpful: they provide a scale and are nicely distributed, like the staffage figures in old paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 15:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Beaune.- Vitrail de la chapelle de l'Hôtel-Dieu aux armoiries de Nicolas Rolin,.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 10:35:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
- InfoThe coat of arms of Nicolas Rolin, Chancelor of the duke of Burgundy, founder of the Hospices de Beaune. Created and uploaded by all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 10:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pierre André (talk) 10:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 12:27:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info created and uploaded by Lessa.danilo - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I didn't find anything special in the picture, I might be wrong.Mounir Neddi (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah, nothing impressive like Mounir Neddi said. Wolverine XI 08:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 13:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Sashimi of São Paulo.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 15:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice arrangement of forms and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cochevis huppé Gbollat.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:47:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp! Like the birds hair-do. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes lol :-) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking pose. --Tagooty (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another incredible bird image. Wolverine XI 08:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 22:11:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info created and uploaded by Hardscarf - nominated by ★ -- ★ 22:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 22:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The light doesn't work for me. The two silhouettes of the guys seen from behind in the foreground are too dominant in the composition. Also very average quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 06:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cebras comunes (Equus quagga), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-25, DD 90.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 08:09:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
- Info Couple of plains zebras (Equus quagga), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating intertwined lines, that evoke me Victor Vasarely's painting Zebras (1937) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 13:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed and exposed, sharp. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Benji 16:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment! --Tagooty (talk) 15:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 02:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry but there is like a blurry area with a lack of contrast on the animal on the right El Golli Mohamed 17:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- What took you so long?. Pitiful. Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith and avoid those snarky comments if you can. SHB2000 (talk) 01:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with Poco and Zzzs. This is clearly a revenge vote. This user has a long history of characterized behavioral problem:
- Reported twice at COM:ANU for explicit revenge votes. Warned in 2015 (see the huge list of disrupted nominations in this consensual section).
- Blocked 2 weeks in 2024 for recurrence.
- Recently also on an other Poco's nomination (using the same words as him in this unsuccessful nomination). -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- In any case, Poco2 should not be the one to call them out, but rather from an uninvolved user (such as you). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- What took you so long?. Pitiful. Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Took me long enough to support this. Wolverine XI 22:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Eurasian coot (60587).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 15:51:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
- Info Eurasian coot (Fulica atra). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wolverine XI 22:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colours and composition with the broken reflection --Tagooty (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A nice picture, but I wouldn't call it extraordinary. This bird is very common, ligthing fine, but not outstanding and the level of detail (12 MPx) normal. Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. -- Karelj (talk) 11:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, its not so good among your bird shots. Not so sharp, background is also not so photogenic (colors, reflexition). Obviously is much easier when they are on the tree than in the water, for background. --Mile (talk) 08:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Swimming ducks are quite easy to spot and photograph. The FPC guidelines state "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." This specimen has a rather ordinary plumage color. The resolution of the picture is not huge, given the large background, and the reflection of the head suffers from water turbulence. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Emys orbicularis 2020 G2.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 11:32:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 12:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The head is in good focus, but the body is partly blurred. The legs are obscured by grass. This is a common slow moving species with a large number of images in Commons. --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, per Tagooty. --A.Savin 09:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Écomusée d’Alsace 98.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 11:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#France
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 11:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Pierre André (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 17:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The only thing that could improve this picture would have been a faster speed, to freeze the water. But it's a minor aspect of the overall impression, that is very good, in my view. Nice light and weather, interesting building, appealing composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Using a nd filter would have made it better (to get the water fall smooth) Poco a poco (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love the mood. Wolverine XI 08:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Katsura River bank with pleasure boats and illuminated building at sunset Kyoto Japan.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 03:31:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Japan
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The picture is fine but not among our finest. The compo is nothing extraordinary and although at this time of the day the lighting could be very interesting (with beautiful colors in the sky), it didn't work here. Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I agree with Poco a poco, the attention goes to the right and the window with lights but there is nothing really interesting there, I think the photo lacks some truly important or main element. I would have liked to see people working or doing their daily chores to give it a lively image, also the colors look very dull or shadowed, perhaps the denoise was a little too much. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info ISO 50, camera on tripod -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Poco. My main issue is it looks a tad too dull. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
File:At Dunham Massey 2024 075.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 20:12:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 20:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 20:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive building, nice composition and well-handled daytime light. The level of detail at full resolution is maybe slightly lacking but at most sizes it's pretty good. I've made a suggestion for cropping a little off the left and bottom to get rid of the cut-off window and help with the symmetry a bit, which I think could make this very good image even better. BigDom (talk) 07:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped as suggested. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are a large number of images of this building. I find nothing exceptional about this one. BTW, the image page lacks a caption and description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagooty (talk • contribs) 11:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oops, caption now added. This is a busy venue, so getting a view without people, and with this light and weather, is not so common. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, this is a nice and decent shot but I wouldn't call it extraordinary, there are many buildings like this (light is nice though) Poco a poco (talk) 07:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Plenty of uninteresting foreground. The building is well photographed but I can't see an FP here. --Ermell (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
File:At Dunham Massey 2024 064 - Teasel.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 20:08:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Dipsacaceae
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop on the sides, and disturbing background. Yann (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, the background is too cluttered Poco a poco (talk) 19:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. -- Karelj (talk) 11:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 15:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info Monsoon rain clouds over the Kaveri River, looking upstream towards the evening sun. Doddegaudana Koppalu, Mandya district, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support This image with its contrasting tones epitomises the monsoon as the source of fresh life and cooler weather after the searing dry summer, and simultaneously a source of havoc due to flooding rivers. -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Red squirrel (21808).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 22:01:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
- Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 22:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great detail on the squirrel's face and paws. Even lighting and a great pose too. Lovely photo. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Like with a QI candidate the WB feels here you yellowish, otherwise nice Poco a poco (talk) 07:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
True, excess of yellow. Or was it yellow filter. --Mile (talk) 08:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC) - Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded @Poco a poco and PetarM: Oops, missed your comment at QIC. New versions uploaded of this one and that. Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- An improvement, thank you, I Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, wonderful pose. – Aristeas (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC) p.S. Anyway, i tried in morning, i changed yellow color, not WB, it was a bit better.
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 06:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive shot. Wolverine XI 08:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Pic Casterau (4).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 09:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 09:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 09:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the warm light at the peaks in the background, and the way the hills to the left create even light for the foreground. Image is sharp and expansive. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wide green scenery offering a spectacular view -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin & Basile. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Via S Francesco in Padua (2).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 09:52:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely view -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great shot. --Plozessor (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Double world. – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 18:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 08:48:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info A delicious photograph of a street of Paris in the 1850s, before Haussmann's renovation of the city. It really gives the feeling of just being there and walking around. Moreover, all the advertisements are a great plus. /// Photograph by Charles Marville (1813-1879) (as one of a set: you can also tell in your comment if you think that this one may be more suited) - uploaded by Paris 16 - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting, but it needs restoration first. Yann (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, what do you mean by that? It has already been cropped and b&w'ed (by the uploader itself). Anything further would degenerate it, I think. :| LucaLindholm (talk) 13:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I mean that the spots and scratches should be removed/cleaned. I can do it, but it will take some time. Yann (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Ah ok, No problem if it is only that and not the image itself... but how do we process this nomination? LucaLindholm (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LucaLindholm: I think you could withdraw, and renominate it once I (or anyone else) made a restored version. Yann (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, ah ok. Well, I wasn't obtaining any support as for now, maybe just for this reason.
- Ok, now I will learn how to withdraw it... LucaLindholm (talk) 21:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LucaLindholm: If you want to withdraw a nomination, just add the following in a new line at the end of the nomination:
{{Withdraw}} ~~~~
Best, – Aristeas (talk) 10:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LucaLindholm: If you want to withdraw a nomination, just add the following in a new line at the end of the nomination:
- @LucaLindholm: I think you could withdraw, and renominate it once I (or anyone else) made a restored version. Yann (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Ah ok, No problem if it is only that and not the image itself... but how do we process this nomination? LucaLindholm (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I mean that the spots and scratches should be removed/cleaned. I can do it, but it will take some time. Yann (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, what do you mean by that? It has already been cropped and b&w'ed (by the uploader itself). Anything further would degenerate it, I think. :| LucaLindholm (talk) 13:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Mont St Michel at sunrise.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 09:47:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created & uploaded by Lynx1211 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the appealing light and water reflection. We only have three FPs of this famous place, one at night and two detail shots. Thank you for the nomination, Tomer T! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support What is at the bottom of the island? I thought it was ice but... is it dirty? --Wilfredor (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Mud and sand. The Mont St Michel is famous for having fast raising tides, and quicksand. Yann (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarify it my dear Wilfredor (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Mud and sand. The Mont St Michel is famous for having fast raising tides, and quicksand. Yann (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Majestic reflection. ★ 14:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support WOW! Great composition, love the lighting, and you can even perceive the curvature of the Earth! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Fantastic light and extraordinary mirror image at sunrise -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 17:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 20:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. – Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
OpposeI will minus it; 1st: Quality would be somehow OK with older sensor, APS-C or similar, but i saw this new toy make 9504 × 6336 px, while we have 6 × 4 kPx. Looking at focal it wasnt croped to zoom, at least not in full - i see lens had some biger zoom. 2nd: mirroring is a bit out, especially bridge of left. Crop is also so-so. --Mile (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC) p.S. Much beter option.- Thank you very much for your review and for pointing out something to improve. Regarding resolution, I fully understand your point of view. Yes, the camera offers 9504 × 6336, but in my opinion, the technical quality is not (only) about pixel count – I always try to get as close as possible to the ideal case, where every pixel of the image carries meaningful information. And because of the bayer pattern of camera sensors, this is not achievable in general, regardless of the lens used. And besides that, there are sometimes things like noise and interpolation artifacts after lens/perspective correction, etc…
- For example this image (not mine) was approved as a quality image, but imho absolutely lacks the quality to justify the 85 MB and 19 732 × 11 839 pixels. Downscaled to half the dimensions, it does not lose any detail but appears to be sharper and the interpolation artifacts are less disturbing.
- So I work in two modes:
- 1) When possible, I take pictures with pixel shift. This eliminates the negatives of the bayer pattern and noise as well. I produce these images in full res 9504 × 6336. The theoretical output is 19008 × 12672, but again, in practice it does not have enough detail to justify it. In my tests, in perfect conditions 11000 × 7333 was the largest reasonable size.
- For example this was created with pixel shift and represents what I consider a good level of detail to justify the resolution. You can almost count individual stones in the walls.
- 2) If pixel shift is not possible, I take the picture in full res and use it as an advantage to perform (if needed) noise reduction, lens correction, geometry correction, cropping etc… and than produce a lower res picture that offers good sharpness and level of detail and again eliminates artifacts and the bayer pattern issues. For example filmmakers work the same way: many films are shot in 6K to produce a good quality 4K final output.
- In this case, I didn’t use pixel shift and didn’t involve any lens/geometry correction. So I can adjust the crop and upload a full res file if the consensus here on Wikipedia is that full res is the preferred way considering all pros and cons. Lynx1211 (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I was checking that yesterday, if you put hi-res setting straight to 24 MPx, since i saw you put many on that resolution. But i saw you have this 3 options. So i suppose you can put Hi-res to 26 MPx straight, which i would not argue, since sometime i dont see any good point of using 80 MPx or even 233 MPx. Here about Hi-res. While i think on single shot we could leave orignal size. Now i dont know if you have handheld Hi-Res, compared to your image i am sure it wasnt made with. I would expect better even from single. About photo from "laser" it's good made, but scarry size, no use of it, isn't mosaic or similar. I still see your best pic of St. Michel that i mentioned; light, quality. I am not sure for "So I can adjust the crop and upload a full res file if the consensus here on Wikipedia is that full res...", if photos will become so large who knows. I would use mentioned, put to 26 Mpx straight. --Mile (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sidenote from another α7R IV user: On the α7R IV (which was used here), the cited 26 MP and 15 MP options apply to JPEG output only. They are not available for raw image (ARW) files, which should be preferred for all high-quality photographs. Since the α7R V, Sony offers also medium and small raw image (ARW) files, but from misc. expert discussions I have learnt that these formats should not be used for demanding photographs (like this one) because the creation of medium and small raw image files from the full raw image data requires the data to be demosaiced and hence results in a slight loss of dynamic range which can hinder the highlight reconstruction by good raw image converters like Lightroom/ACR. This means: To get the best results for high-quality photography, one should use (a) on the α7R (I) to IV: the uncompressed raw image format; (b) on the α7R V: the full-size losslessly compressed raw image format, avoiding both Sony’s old lossy ARW compression and the new medium and small raw image formats or restricting them to less important scenes. – Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A lot of bothering reading those reviews, now i see Sony 7 IV 26 MPx option is a more a fake. I supposed it work RAW and put downsized JPEG. But i would love to see uncompresed RAW in full size, not on 16 GB RAM (if it works ?) but more 32 GB. So, pay camera same as PC, to work normaly. I dont bother much even in handheld Hi-Res, jpeg out, not even on best compresion. But dont worry too much, normaly croped sensor win. --Mile (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 16:04:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 16:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 16:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice shot but the (at least mine, when looking at the FP gallery) expectation is higher than here in terms of detail Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice angle of view of a not common scene to photograph -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Diego. This seems like the focus is just slightly off. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Giles Laurent. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Личинка божкоровки.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 19:59:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Coccinellidae (Ladybugs)
- Info Coccinellidae (Ladybugs) / Created by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But: A black animal on a black background... another colour (eg. light grey as background) would be better IMO --Llez (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive level of detail. 13,778 × 9,186 pixels is really a huge resolution for such a tiny creature -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--shizhao (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 20:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Cirrhitidae_(Hawkfishes)
- Info Arc-eye hawkfish (Paracirrhites arcatus), Zanzibar, Tanzania. The specific name arcatus means “arched”, an allusion which Cuvier did not explain but it may refer to the horseshoe shaped mark behind the eye. It is found in shallow waters in the tropical Indo-Pacific on reefs, resting on coral heads much of the time. It's solitary and preys mostly on shrimps, small fishes, crabs, and other crustaceans. Note: no FPs of this species and only 2 of the whole family Cirrhitidae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the light-coloured stripe on the back a reflection or a line on the fish?--Ermell (talk) 10:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ermell: No reflection, the stripe is characteristic to this species. I don't use flash and, of course, there is no window between the fish and the camera. You can also check other images of this species (like this one). Poco a poco (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching arc-eye! The white line is also eye-catching once explained. --Tagooty (talk) 03:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile and Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 16:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info created by Paul Cézanne / Google Art Project, uploaded by Ekenaes, nominated by Yann
- Info The Sainte-Victoire Mountain seen from the Bibémus quarry, by Paul Cézanne.
- Support Notable painting, good reproduction, high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 16:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Faithful reproduction -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good reproduction of one of the iconic Montagne Sainte-Victoire paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Machu Picchu.png, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 01:59:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1910-1919
- Info General view of Machu Picchu in 1912, taken shortly after major clearing efforts were completed during the Yale Peruvian Expedition led by Hiram Bingham III. It is one of the earliest documented views of the site. Created by Hiram Bingham III - uploaded and nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obviously there are issues with photography from over 100 years ago that severely impact the image quality compared with modern technology. But this image documents something that cannot be appreciated any other way. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Documents what a relevation the discovery of Machu Picchu meant. – Aristeas (talk) 15:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but for me wow/documentary factor < quality. Wolverine XI 08:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2024 at 10:21:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info created by Jerzy Strzelecki - uploaded by Jerzy Strzelecki - nominated by Jerzystrzelecki -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Excellent at thumbnail size, but out of focus and noisy at full size. If we don't have a VI of this species, that may be the best route. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting insect, however, low quality (I added a other version in the page description but not in FP level ever) --Wilfredor (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: poor quality level -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Splendid pic. Wolverine XI 08:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks like a lovely place for a walk. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice juxtaposition of the open architecture at the left with the greened façade at the right. – Aristeas (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 08:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
- Info created by the school of Pieter Brueghel the Elder, uploaded by The Herald, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Remembers me the "Three blind mice" in the James Bond film Dr. No --Llez (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but there is a problem with the file description and naming. The painting is not the one attributed to Pieter Bruegel the Elder, that is located at the en:Museo di Capodimonte, at Naples. It's instead the one in Paris. So, it should be attributed to Pieter Brueghel the Younger, even though the Google Art project says something different. Besides, on the Louvre Museum website, the attribution to Pieter Brueghel the Younger is presented just as an old one. I did just correct the article on en.wiki: en:The Blind Leading the Blind. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but how do you know this is a copy by Brueghel the Younger? I guess the Louvre is an authoritative reference. Yann (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- For sure, this file does not reproduce the one painted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder. The Louvre says: "La parabole des aveugles, d'après Pieter I Brueghel", The Blind leading the Blind according to, not by, Pieter I Brueghel. Also, at the attribution: School of Pieter I Brueghel, etc. The museum does not say it was painted by Pieter Brueghel the Older. The attribution of the painting in the Google Art Project is wrong, and consequently here. So, description and naming are wrong, for sure. This file reproduce the painting to which this category refers: Category:Parable of the Blind by Pieter Brueghel the Younger. The attribution of the painting to Pieter Brueghel the Younger is presented as dated by the Louvre Museum. So, the name of the file and the name of the category should not refer to Pieter Brueghel the Younger, but to the School of Pieter Brueghel the Older. The author should be considered unknown. Finally, the oldest painting, attributed to Pieter Bruegel the Elder, is the one conserved in Naples. Consequently, this one is a copy, painted by some pupil of him. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, it is a copy of the painting from Capodimonte, but attributing it to Brueghel the Younger is certainly wrong. Yann (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand your point. This picture reproduce the same painting to which this category refers, or not? I'm not saying that Brueghel the Younger is the author. It could be a way to distinguish two artworks that are similar: the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger (and conserved in Paris), and the one painted by Bruegel the Elder (and conserved in Naples). For now, this file is in the wrong category, it is attributed to the wrong painter, and its title is misleading. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Images in Category:Parable of the Blind by Pieter Brueghel the Younger are of so poor quality that it is difficult to say. Anyway the attribution there may also be wrong, and we need external references, not self-references from Commons. For all we know, it may be a copy by Bruegel the Elder himself. Yann (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for your answer. The artwork hanging in the Louvre Museum, that is the one reproduced here, is the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger (this does not imply that Brueghel the Younger actually painted it). This category refers to the artwork (once, in my opinion) attributed to Brueghel the Younger. It seems logical to me the conclusion that the category refers to the painting hanging in the Louvre Museum. Instead, you are not excluding that there is another artwork of Brueghel the Younger to which the category may refer. I'm quite sure that is not the case, but ok, let's go on. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I updated the description, to match what the Louvre says. Yann (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
{{weak oppose}}The reproduction is good, of course, but information given in the file page is incomplete and, to some extent, misleading: Brueghel the Older is stated as the author; the uploading date is stated as the "date" (of the painting). The file page of the other candidate artwork is an excellent example of how it could/should be, with the suitable differences. I checked also the gallery, and there are not description pages like this among the tens that I opened. I'm sorry for the objection. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't understand what you want. I changed the credit and the description to match the Louvre description. I created a Wikidata item, and renamed the category. Yann (talk) 21:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for what you have done. Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Fox Portrait.png, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 13:39:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
- Info created by uploaded by and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 13:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 13:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 13:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded a lot of my images in the past as PNG. Someone recently inquired the same thing and I am uploading new images as JPG. I always use PNG (for myself) because they are lossless files. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- You can always upload 2 versions. Yann (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but then it takes up even more space on the server. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can't upload a different format to the same original image. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is space issue on Wikimedia servers. You have to tick the button Ignore warnings. Yann (talk) 12:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I never had anything come up to warn me about PNG. But I have started uploading JPG. If you look at my contributions, I started with JPG and I am going back to JPG. I understand the concerns and I have altered my behavior accordingly. But I uploaded this just before another FP nomination led to this issue being addressed. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is space issue on Wikimedia servers. You have to tick the button Ignore warnings. Yann (talk) 12:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- You can always upload 2 versions. Yann (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded a lot of my images in the past as PNG. Someone recently inquired the same thing and I am uploading new images as JPG. I always use PNG (for myself) because they are lossless files. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Woow El Golli Mohamed 22:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Personally, I prefer PNGs over JPGs. --Zzzs (talk) 05:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I do too, but they are much larger so I understand why Wikipedia / Wikimedia would rather have the compressed .JPG. But hey, at least I wasn't uploading .tif ;) Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support PNG is more for backup or future editions, png is not used for correct representation on the web, the standard is jpg in most browsers and preferably sRGB --Wilfredor (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very pleasant light and appealing smooth bokeh with excellent contrast foreground / background. The angle of view is also successful. Great portrait of a wild animal -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think this could be cropped for better framing. It's not bad, but I think it falls just shy of Featured Picture with its current composition. Maybe shave a little negative space off the left side and see if that looks better. --DarthCloakedGuy (talk) 08:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is actually an uncropped image. I felt I got it right in the camera. I have two other versions of this "pose" and then several more at 160mm to get the fox sitting (full body) and two when it lay down shot at 200mm. This was my favorite of the bunch. I felt the negative space helped as that was the direction the fox was facing. And I liked the portrait. It was a wonderful moment for me. The fox came out of the tree line and headed towards me, then sat in the middle of the road before laying down in the street. I just sat there with it for a few minutes until it left. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. I would not crop it. – Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly the PNG is such a non-issue here. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support good focus. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
File:James Gillray The King of Brobdingnag and Gulliver.–Vide. Swift's Gulliver- Voyage to Brobdingnag The Metropolitan Museum of Art edit.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 18:40:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in color
- Info created by James Gillray - uploaded restored and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info King Brobdingnag and Gulliver, an 1803 illustration for Gulliver's Travels. James Gillray drew on George III and Napolean Bonaparte for this literary illustration.
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support After having scrutinized this tiny subject with my long lens, I confirm the level of detail is quite compelling for a 221-year-old document -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support a very nice jobǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--shizhao (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 22:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Russia, Category:Featured pictures of Nizhny Novgorod Oblast
- Info created by premier.gov.ru - uploaded and nominated by MasterRus21thCentury --MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info Verkhnyaya Vereya is one of the main symbols of the terrible heat of 2010 in Russia - the day before Vladimir Putin's arrival, the village seemed to have disappeared from the face of the Earth: 337 houses out of 341 burned down. But immediately after the visit of the Russian Prime Minister, a decision was made to restore the village, and that same year he visited it two more times - on September 15 and November 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterRus21thCentury (talk • contribs)
- Oppose Tilted and nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment interesting to learn that Vladimir also knows how to rebuild villages. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile I don't understand the file name, info and categories related to Putin. He is not in the photo.--ArildV (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per all above. Several wrong categories. "Putin visited and all is fine"? LOL --A.Savin 10:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- @A.Savin А что тогда - придётся переименовывать файлы или лучше снять с номинации? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Roman art. Sarcophagus with Dionysian procession. Satyrs nad maenads. Detail. Capitoline Museums. Rome. Italy.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 23:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Photography and uploaded by -- Wilfredor (talk) 23:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Big WOW. --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Having done a few photos of reliefs, I'm going to go on a limb and say that this is gorgeous. That you got it in a museum context, rather than outdoors, is incredible. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 17:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Big WOW.2 Much sugoi. Emdosis (talk) 04:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Traquet du désert Bou Hedma.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
- Info No FPs for this species. Created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The jpg file seems to be too small, perhaps it is a reduced quality version? --Wilfredor (talk) 23:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's a crop because it was nominated as VI and they ask always for a narrow crop for birds. You can see also the wider crop version. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I know it's cut, I'm not talking about the cut, I'm talking more about the quality with which you exported the JPG from Lightroom, it seems that it's too small, it wasn't made at 100% Wilfredor (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's a crop because it was nominated as VI and they ask always for a narrow crop for birds. You can see also the wider crop version. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support You must have been really close! Even at f/8 there is a pretty shallow depth of field. Good fucus on the face and eye. The rock the bird is perched on slowly fades into the beautiful bokeh of the background. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Yes I was really close. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Body not very sharp, routine posture. Large number of FPs in the Gallery, this one does not measure up. --Tagooty (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, it's not true, there are no FPs for this species in the Gallery and for the sharpness I was very close so even at f/8 I can't have also the body very sharp, I was focusing in the head and the eye. I don't understand your opposition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unlike VI, each species does not need to have an FP. An FP is supposed to be one of the finest images in Commons. I look for something exceptional -- colours, posture, action, lighting, composition, etc along with high technical quality. I compare it to others in the FP gallery where it will be placed if promoted. See eg this image of a similar posture, f/8, etc -- much better sharpness throughout. Tagooty (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not all birds live in tropical areas and therefore haven't beautiful colors, so they do not deserve to have FPs. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unlike VI, each species does not need to have an FP. An FP is supposed to be one of the finest images in Commons. I look for something exceptional -- colours, posture, action, lighting, composition, etc along with high technical quality. I compare it to others in the FP gallery where it will be placed if promoted. See eg this image of a similar posture, f/8, etc -- much better sharpness throughout. Tagooty (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, it's not true, there are no FPs for this species in the Gallery and for the sharpness I was very close so even at f/8 I can't have also the body very sharp, I was focusing in the head and the eye. I don't understand your opposition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Tagooty this bird is not the prettiest I've seen and detail is just ok. Even if we have no FPs of this bird and that's a relevant information of the nomination, it cannot be a reason of weight to make it FP. I have documented hundreds of species underwater and I find many of them not worthy for FP because they don't have any interesting features. Poco a poco (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your sincere and competent assessment on reaction to my vote above. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @El Golli Mohamed, you need to stop revenge voting. Just because someone doesn't agree with one of your images becoming a featured picture does not mean you should revenge vote. They are only criticising the photograph, not the photographer. No one should expect all of their photos to become featured pictures. The community loves your photos, but some don't meet a certain standard. It's not worth being blocked for and losing a significant contributor of FPCs on Commons. This behaviour is unacceptable, and I strongly recommend you stop. Zzzs (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- +1 Too many revenge votes with this user -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your sincere and competent assessment on reaction to my vote above. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support - Detail seems adequate, and the bokeh is really nice. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Imlil village, High Atlas Mountains.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 22:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 22:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 22:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Weird dark and light blue hue in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a mountainous area, the lighting varies from one slope to another. @Basile Morin Mounir Neddi (talk) 11:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hazy background, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 17:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh light with midday sun, relatively low resolution (only 3,264 × 2,448 pixels) for a landscape, and per my comment above. The upper right corner is very white, and the turquoise hue in the center seems like fluorescent. The large area with strong shadow is not very appealing, and some houses have blow highlights. I would recommend to try again this picture another time of the day, because the relief is interesting and the result could be completely different at sunset or sunrise -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 07:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin. BigDom (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 04:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info Three narrow river valleys in the Indian Himalayas, the Stod-Doda (left), Tsarap (bottom right) and Zanskar (centre top), meet in the surprisingly broad Padum valley. This view of Padum from the southwest is ~15 km (9.3 mi) south-north and ~6 km (3.7 mi) east-west. Buildings are interspersed with newly-sown fields. Elevation 3,670 m (12,040 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Large image, but avergade quality. Sharpness and processing could be better for FP --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment How come? Both is good for me. --A.Savin 20:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Feeling of space. Agree with A.Savin the sharpness and processing are okay -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- @A.Savin and Basile Morin: Thanks for the comments and support. @George Chernilevsky: The image covers an area of about 15 km x 6 km. In this large area, even doors and windows of size 1-2 metres are clear and distinct. Would appreciate if you could indicate where you see deficiencies. Tagooty (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A nice view but the compo doesn't work for me. It would have been good to find a way to stress the perspective here, not sure. The bottom right crop feels random. Poco a poco (talk) 07:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: The crop was dictated by the location -- an accessible hill without obstructions. --Tagooty (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. --Tagooty (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:USS Boulder (LST-1190), USS Mobile (LKA-115), USS Charleston (LKA-113) and USS El Paso (LKA-117) laid up at the Philadelphia Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility, Pennsylvania (USA), 21 October 2017.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 09:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info created & uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the Nomination. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great pastel coloring; appealing composition due to the precise juxtaposition of the ships, the reflection, and the interesting cloudy sky. Clearly a Wow as I saw it this morning on RPQI. With 3.25 MP's a bit small, but the great composition prevails, imho. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at my files. I should have a larger version of this image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, that would be great :) Radomianin (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at my files. I should have a larger version of this image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice, but I'd rather wait for a file with more resolution, it's too small. Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
-
- Support Now Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question I hate to ask this - but I think I botched it the last time I tried. If I upload another version of this image, how do I post it into the nomination? The last time I uploaded an image, it replaced the image nominated. I just want to follow the proper procedure. I have a 4488 x 2988 pixel version I can upload. Sadly, I cannot locate the original .PSD file or the Raw file. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the question, Needsmoreritalin. If the new image is significantly different from the existing one, then a new version should be uploaded and placed with the headline template Alternative below the first image and all comments of this nomination. For example: File:New version.jpg|480x320px. However, if it is only slightly different and represents a qualitative improvement, you can update the existing photo with a new upload. It is a pity that the original raw is not available. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help! Luckily I have some old external HDDs and found the original raw file! The image may be a little different because I have new sharpening / denoise tools and the crop might not be exactly the same. It should be close. Worse case I can revert. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Needsmoreritalin: Wonderful, many thanks for your efforts! A huge gain for the level of detail in this great photo :) -- Radomianin (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks you too. If it weren't for your comment I wouldn't have gone looking for the file. And I found some other images I haven't seen in years that may help improve some other articles too. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Needsmoreritalin: Wonderful, many thanks for your efforts! A huge gain for the level of detail in this great photo :) -- Radomianin (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help! Luckily I have some old external HDDs and found the original raw file! The image may be a little different because I have new sharpening / denoise tools and the crop might not be exactly the same. It should be close. Worse case I can revert. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the question, Needsmoreritalin. If the new image is significantly different from the existing one, then a new version should be uploaded and placed with the headline template Alternative below the first image and all comments of this nomination. For example: File:New version.jpg|480x320px. However, if it is only slightly different and represents a qualitative improvement, you can update the existing photo with a new upload. It is a pity that the original raw is not available. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 17:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of quite rare cases that a naval ship photo has wow. --A.Savin 20:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent light and eye-catching mirror image -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--ArildV (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin; great arrangement, light, and pastel colours. – Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:D-6-78-181-61 Ehemalige Schäferei Birnfeld.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 15:41:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
- Info created by User:Plozessor - uploaded by User:Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This empty wall doesn't impress me, sorry. Front view of a standard gate. Cut off tree at the left. Nothing extraordinary in the roofs in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above, and perspective seems awkward. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 20:05:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Italy
- Collapsed ruinously in 1521, due to an explosion, it was restored between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries by the architect Luca Beltrami. He was responsible for the imposing mass of the Filarete Tower of the (Sforza Castle) in Milan, dedicated to the King of Italy Umberto I and solemnly inaugurated on 24 September 1905. Difficult both to frame and focus due to its enormous size, I decided to create a vertical panorama of three photographs. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good luck with WLM, i see Italy started early. Is that date correct, shoted last year ? More important, you could put some Vibrance, colors are a bit dull. --Mile (talk) 08:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Mile, you are very kind. I applied some vibrance, but I'm not sure if you've seen the latest version. In that case I (probably) may have applied too little vibrance... Terragio67 (talk) 11:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:021 African savanna hare in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2024 at 21:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Leporidae_(Hares_and_rabbits)
- Info African savanna hare in the Serengeti National Park. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 17:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
OpposeSharpness is very good, as usual, but the lighting is very difficult. The crop also feels too tight and the angle (looking down) not favourable Poco a poco (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2024 (UTC)- Thank you for your review. I just uploaded a new version with a different crop and different lighting (shadows lifted), press CMD+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 with image open to see the new version. Giles Laurent (talk) 19:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, an improvement, I move to Neutral, thank you. Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The sharpness of the eyes makes it the FP for me.--Ermell (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 08:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice view but blown highlights due to harsh light, or unsuitable camera settings -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 09:41:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Serbia
- Info Temple of Saint Sava, Belgrade. My shot, from 2021. If you click on group above, we had similar night shot, just day is missing. --Mile (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The new version is better with the statue having a brighter and more normalized appearance. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 08:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the Căpriana monastery, Căpriana, Moldova. The Eastern Orthodoxy monastery, one of the oldest in the country, was founded in 1429. Note: we have no FPs from this country at all. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Come to Brazil! 🇧🇷 ★ 11:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--shizhao (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crystal clear sharp, well done ! --Wilfredor (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A very lavish interior, but beautifully captured symmetrically.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Famberhorst. – Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Vivid colours and remarkable detail. --Tagooty (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - Tipiche imbarcazioni - 2024-09-02 20-33-08 001.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 19:05:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailboats
- Typical sailboats in the canal port of Cesenatico, Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Great composition and lighting, but I see some haloing/oversharpening on the tower. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- The halo disappeared when I reduced sharpen and saturation (from raw). In my opinion now the image is less artificial and still beautiful, thanks for the advice. Terragio67 (talk) 07:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info New version uploaded. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good now! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the boats and their eye-catching sails is convincing. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin; good use of telephoto compression. – Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Црква „Св. Никола“ - Челопек 5.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 20:44:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see at first what is extraordinary here. The apse looks indeed renovated recently so that the historical value is probably limited. Lighting or detail are not compensating that, either. --Poco a poco (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support for the Kiril's potential. ★ 18:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Huppe fasciée Lac de Tunis.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 13:33:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice distribution with the bird on the right.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Famberhorst --Terragio67 (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The shadows are a bit unfortunate, but the high definition on the feathers, the soft background and the bird’s expressive posture/look make up for that. – Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent --Wilfredor (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Natural looking plumage detail without excessive sharpening – well done. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Agouti In Tulum.png, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2024 at 15:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Rodentia_(Rodents)
- Info There is no gallery for the family Dasyproctidae.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, I know its a PNG. I have pledged to upload future images as .JPG -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Please upload the jpg version, This is better rendered by mediawiki than png --Wilfredor (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great sharpness (I'm in fact counting the days to get a R5 Mark II) in spite of high ISO, but tricky lighting (the subject is underexposed). Why do you add "All right reserved" to your EXIF if you publish with CC BY-SA 4.0? that looks contradictory --Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The photographer may change his mind and release the picture any time later. For us, the Commons license is what finally counts, not the EXIF info. --A.Savin 08:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, when I got the Camera I set t he EXIF data like that. But when I upload to Wikipedia I have to release the rights. It remains in the EXIF, but its Creative Commons Share Alike With Attribution now. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, by the way, congrats on getting the R5 Mk II. I hope it brings you much joy! Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback and to Alex for the coherent explanation. It will still take time until the camera is in my hands but thank you! :) Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose One of those rare photos that looks better when viewed at full resolution with some very nice detail. But overall the lighting situation is just far too distracting; the subject is in deep shadow and the eye is drawn to the bright patches in the background. BigDom (talk) 06:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Would the image benefit from a tighter crop? The subject was under tree cover and you can see there was a gap in the canopy leading to that bright spot above and to the right of the subject. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very detailed at full resolution but at first sight unappealing light (animal and background) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comments from you and BigDom led me to upload an alternative, if this addresses your concerns, please let me know. If not, I can withdraw nomination. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
edit- Info Re-cropped (back to 2:3) and made adjustments in Photoshop to bring shadows up by 5 and highlights down by 5, with a neutral density gradient in the upper right to address concerns about the bright spot.
- Comment Now the crop is tight at the right in my opinion. And still not sure about the light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. Last version (at 18:10) is better in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me know if this helps. If not, I can always withdraw nomination. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would suggest not to withdraw and wait for other feedbacks. I'm between neutral and weak support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. Last version (at 18:10) is better in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Right crop to tight. Add few pixles. But light is much better and supportable. --Mile (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Updated, thanks! Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support They dont vote, hard to open it, too big. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Better IMO but I still think backlighting is not ideal for this kind of shot. BigDom (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support better --Wilfredor (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ips typographus (female).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 13:00:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)
- Info created by Gilles San Martin - uploaded by Iifar - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- shizhao (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Strange beetle, impressive quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nasty animal --Wilfredor (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Alvesgaspar. – Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 10:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info Informative and high resolution view of the Tribulaun-Group in the Stubai Alps. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp image with good depth of field. Interesting to see the peak in the foreground has trees and presumably grasses, and the peak behind is bare. Great glacial striations on the central peak in the background too. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The sharpness is good in the top part, but could be better in the lower part --Llez (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Is the suggestion to crop the lower part? I really don't think it is that unsharp. Milseburg (talk) 13:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Splendid view, clear and educative. – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas (nice view). – Terragio67 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Полярное сияние на Чукотке.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2024 at 19:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
- Info The aurora borealis in Chukotka / Created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Small resolution. Only 2,300 × 1,535 pixels. And blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- @JukoFF, any chance you can fix this? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Unfortunately a small image for the enormous potential of this camera, probably not the full version --Wilfredor (talk) 03:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, a pity. --A.Savin 10:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Wieskirche 18.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2024 at 13:03:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
- Info Ceiling painting in the nave of the UNESCO World Heritage Pilgrimage Church “Die Wies”, Steingaden, Bavaria, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What is this gray embedding of the ceiling painting for? --Msb (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info You are right, black is a better background for there is more contrast. I changed it. --Llez (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Much better now. Msb (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info You are right, black is a better background for there is more contrast. I changed it. --Llez (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A baroque heaven. – Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! --Tagooty (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Athyma perius (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Sergeant (4) WLB.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 04:37:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry man, but neither the composition nor the quality impress me. Wolverine XI 08:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- What's wrong about the quality? --A.Savin 10:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing, this is the best image I've ever seen. Like there's no image that will top this. I'm very much impressed with the image quality. Wolverine XI 17:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for this extremely enlightening response. --A.Savin 09:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: In case you couldn't tell, that was sarcasm. I was aware that there was nothing exceptional about this picture, thus the revelation of the false background does not come as a huge surprise. Wolverine XI 13:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Quality ≠ wow. --A.Savin 18:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: In case you couldn't tell, that was sarcasm. I was aware that there was nothing exceptional about this picture, thus the revelation of the false background does not come as a huge surprise. Wolverine XI 13:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for this extremely enlightening response. --A.Savin 09:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing, this is the best image I've ever seen. Like there's no image that will top this. I'm very much impressed with the image quality. Wolverine XI 17:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- What's wrong about the quality? --A.Savin 10:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Oppose Vulcan struck out his vote after reading others' observationVulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice composition, part of grass was helpfull - like golden spiral curve. Colors combine. --Mile (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Struck vote until clarified -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support new version -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Struck vote until clarified -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is fine, the delicate balanced composition is great, as said in the QIC page a good FP candidate. Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Zzzs (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Strong opposeI thought its technical quality is good since it is a QI. Now that its been revealed to have been digitally manipulated to deceive viewers, this should definitely not be a featured picture. Maybe its QI should also be revoked. --Zzzs (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
SupportStunning! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Support-- Radomianin (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose in line with the ongoing discussion about undocumented manipulation. Support removed and opposition vote placed.-- Radomianin (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding composition. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
SupportAgree. -- -donald- (talk) 07:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)OpposePer others. -- -donald- (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)- Support and back to pro. -- -donald- (talk) 09:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
SupportAgree with Mile -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
OpposeFake background? Undeclared -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The new version -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Striking composition--Tagooty (talk) 03:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose In view of the opinions of several experts and the absence of a response by the uploader/nominator, I have changed my support to oppose. --Tagooty (talk) 03:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Support --A.Savin 10:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Oppose per others --A.Savin 00:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent quality, outstanding composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with the discussion below that the background apparently has been replaced. We could allow the cut-out, but in any case such a substantial edit must (i) be explained and (ii) done in the best possible way – right now there are some rough edges and (at the bottom) some strange pixels which may be remnants of the original background. – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Update: Ah, now we know the background has not been replaced (the strange pixels at the bottom and some rough corners have misled me). So I’m sorry if my comment above was harsh; but I keep the oppose vote for now because the editing is still a bit unfortunate and does not do justice to this great photo. Radomianin’s new version is much better (thank you), I would be happy to support it. – Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)- Question Is this a cut-out background @Anitava Roy and Atudu: and doesn't this camera have a maximum resolution of 5184 × 3456 pixels? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
supportUpdating per discussion below. Not opposing, but holding off on supporting until we can get the facts straight. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Almost perfect enough to be skeptical, but the quality of the uploader's work looks consistent with regard to this kind of composition. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Have you zoomed right in and examined the edges Rhododendrites? Doesn't look right to me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm. The flat speckling makes it look like this might be some sort of backdrop/cardstock placed behind the insect? — Rhododendrites talk | 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- As the uploader/nominator have not replied, could some experienced eyes have a very close look please @Poco a poco, Basile Morin, Llez, Giles Laurent, Crisco 1492, Tagooty, Frank Schulenburg, and XRay: Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- It does look like a cut-out. There is a slight halo (a darker blue/green) on the bottom of the butterfly, and no noise on the background. Well spotted! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, part of the wing is floating in green. Definite cut out. Struck my support - still great, but the cutout should be noted (and is a bit rough). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose This nomination should be withdrawn as it has misled voters.@Ermell, A.Savin, JukoFF, VulcanSphere, PetarM, Agnes Monkelbaan, Aristeas, Famberhorst, Rhododendrites, -donald-, and Zzzs: Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - @Charlesjsharp: , so you have asked the uploader to respond at 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC) and started rallying everyone at 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC) ans asked for withdrawal of nomination at 20:54, 5 September 2024, citing that they have not responded, which is less than 24 hours time for them. Isn't it too much to expect from volunteers from global south countries to respond then and there? I hope you understand that, people can have their own real life problems to deal with and not everyone might be in a super privileged position to respond in volunteer capacity on an emergency basis as and when asked. Personally, I don't have any issues if the FP nomination is rejected on technical grounds and if everyone changes the vote from support to reject but rallying and targeting without giving ample time to respond and not assuming good faith towards the editors, who have been contributing to Wikimedia sites in a significant way, can very well be demotivating to many people. Unlike you, I am not pinging anyone, who voted here, without any kind of expectation for them to change their votes or their minds, but I simply hope that everyone can at least assume good faith towards the uploader and provide him sufficient time to respond. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- dear,this is not a cut out background.i am ready to show raw file also.please inform me where to upload the raw file . Anitava Roy (talk) 12:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer. You can upload it on swisstransfer for example (or any other site, like wetransfer for example) and then share the download link with us -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- As implied by Giles, Commons does not support the upload of raw files so you'll need to upload it elsewhere and link to it here. Two other options are Google Drive or Dropbox. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- dear,this is not a cut out background.i am ready to show raw file also.please inform me where to upload the raw file . Anitava Roy (talk) 12:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment currently i am offline, from PC, but can people put some note where are problems, maybe we can solve them, and pic is still very good. I think we had many artificial bacground by now, even size biger than camera can make. erasing nomination because of that... ?! Only stuff here is to put templetate photoedited - artificial background.Some tolerance with quick-triggered acts, author maybe not online each day. --Mile (talk) 10:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nine years ago, I uploaded a manipulated image to Commons. The reasons don't matter; the fact is that I did wrong, and I will carry this guilt for the rest of my days here on Commons. Unfortunately, there is no turning back once we haven't been honest. The modifications that are obvious to me may not be to others, so it is always important to list all the manipulations made, not only in the upload history to see the changes, but also in the (retouch) template. I deeply regret that this situation happened, and I hope it doesn't happen again in the future. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)- CommentHello all, the uploader has sent me the raw file, which I have uploaded in this link for your refences https://www.swisstransfer.com/d/2cbe8615-f8ed-4ded-8f43-6db1f0189007. --Atudu (talk) 07:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Atudu. Now is clear what the issue is: background is genuine, just an unnecessarily overprocessed image and upscaled from 18 mpix to 20 for unknown reasons. That said, I would advice to redevelop and nominate again. --A.Savin 07:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version proposed Dear reviewers @Anitava Roy, Atudu, Wolverine XI, A.Savin, VulcanSphere, Giles Laurent, Zzzs, Crisco 1492, -donald-, Basile Morin, Tagooty, Agnes Monkelbaan, Aristeas, Famberhorst, Rhododendrites, Charlesjsharp, Wilfredor, Bodhisattwa, and Archaeodontosaurus: I took the liberty of redeveloping the file and making it available as a 16-bit Tiff under this SwissTransfer link. Feel free to upload it as an update, or even better as an alternative version if you like the result. The only strange thing I noticed is that the nominated version was interpolated after developing. Based on the new version and the cropping I noticed this indication. String interpolations should not be made. Sorry for the mass pinging of at least the active users in this discussion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nice job Radomianin, there's just a few dark green pixels left at the bottom (but less than this nomination) in 3-4 small areas -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip, Giles. I'm not sure if I found the pixels you mentioned, but I have updated the SwissTransfer link with a new file. If there are still problems, please feel free to make a change. Many thanks and best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nice job Radomianin, there's just a few dark green pixels left at the bottom (but less than this nomination) in 3-4 small areas -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version proposed Dear reviewers @Anitava Roy, Atudu, Wolverine XI, A.Savin, VulcanSphere, Giles Laurent, Zzzs, Crisco 1492, -donald-, Basile Morin, Tagooty, Agnes Monkelbaan, Aristeas, Famberhorst, Rhododendrites, Charlesjsharp, Wilfredor, Bodhisattwa, and Archaeodontosaurus: I took the liberty of redeveloping the file and making it available as a 16-bit Tiff under this SwissTransfer link. Feel free to upload it as an update, or even better as an alternative version if you like the result. The only strange thing I noticed is that the nominated version was interpolated after developing. Based on the new version and the cropping I noticed this indication. String interpolations should not be made. Sorry for the mass pinging of at least the active users in this discussion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is great. I waited if someone will put note, saw none yesterday night. Now i checked with original, picture was rotated and scalled-up (yes, up. Not down.) to 6×4 k, and a part was covered (left-bottom corner). I think our community screw up a big. Yesterday night i went with 200-300% to check mistakes, could find'em. Here you can see https://www.flickr.com/photos/mile_risto/53977382740/in/dateposted/ --Mile (talk) 10:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The mistakes are that there's dark green pixels at the bottom of the butterfly that didn't benefit from the exposure + color change. There is also dark pixels at the bottom right of the picture, probably originating from upscaling or sharpening. The dark green pixels at the bottom of the butterfly led some people to think that the original background was cut-out and it turned out it's not true. I think people should have assumed good faith and let time to the author explain because for me there was three possibilities : 1) fake background; 2) mask that was not extended enough to apply color and exposure change (=what happened here); or 3) remains of chromatic aberration -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Atudu. Now is clear what the issue is: background is genuine, just an unnecessarily overprocessed image and upscaled from 18 mpix to 20 for unknown reasons. That said, I would advice to redevelop and nominate again. --A.Savin 07:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I dare say we owe Anitava Roy an apology for calling this image a fake background, and thanks all for looking into it. I revert to my Support comment above. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Tangential discussion - boldly collapsing as this page is already confusing :) — Rhododendrites talk | 20:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
|
---|
|
- +1 as per Rhododendrites. I have removed my dissenting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment New version by Randomian I would support, once uploaded as JPEG over the original. --A.Savin 13:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I cleared dots in 2 options, same size : 1, 2. Dots were part of original as i see, and some dots are left. Author can download and replace. @Giles Laurent dots arent mistake, just came biger with edits. --Mile (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The RAW file submitted indicates that the FPC was submitted with a heavily manipulated background. I never said it was a cut-out or fake background; I opposed the nomination as it had misled voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- SwissTransfer link updated Dear reviewers @Anitava Roy, Atudu, A.Savin, Giles Laurent, Rhododendrites, Charlesjsharp, and PetarM: From the new tiff, developed from the raw, I have provided a jpg ready for upload under the updated SwissTransfer link above. Perhaps the nomination can be rescued with an update. I have now only pinged the most active discussants, as well as the author and nominator. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just be bold and upload it. --A.Savin 16:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your encouragement, A.Savin. Because of the different time zones, I would like to wait for the opinions of the involved discussants, especially the author and the nominator. Especially if the author is satisfied with my version, he is welcome to use it for an update. Personally, I also wouldn't like it if someone updates my photos without consent. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would not oppose Radomianin's edited version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Radomianin: Thank you for your support. As per your suggestion I have uploaded the version of the aforementioned image. --Atudu (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - This nomination will be a good test of FPCbot's counting abilities. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 16:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good, now author can choose any option to replace original and can put support vote too, (Anitava Roy). --Mile (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC) p.S. @Giles Laurent I removed CA on both options: 1, 2
- Support Ok now for me... you have friends! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Resolved Dear reviewers @Anitava Roy, Wolverine XI, A.Savin, VulcanSphere, Giles Laurent, Zzzs, Crisco 1492, Basile Morin, Tagooty, Agnes Monkelbaan, Aristeas, Famberhorst, Rhododendrites, Charlesjsharp, Wilfredor, and Bodhisattwa: , the user Atudu has uploaded the new version, developed from raw, as an update. With the request to re-evaluate the photo, I am pinging all active discussants one last time before the nomination ends in about 15 hours. There is now a real chance of rescuing this nomination. Thank you very much in advance, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have withdrawn my oppose vote, but still wonder about the wisdom of submitting a flipped image here @Anitava Roy and Atudu: . Doesn't the position of the butterfly's feet show that it was hanging upside down? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan reinstated support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 14:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support again. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you all for your valuable opinions. I suggest that if an image seems controversial or raises concerns, we should reach out to the photographer to request the original version before making any adverse comments. It's important not to pass judgment without understanding the full context, as negative feedback can hurt and demotivate photographers. By placing trust in each other’s work and approaching feedback with good faith, we can maintain a positive atmosphere and continue to move forward together.--Atudu (talk) 04:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 04:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
- Info Schaopedobbe (Sheep Pond). Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in a flowering heathland bathed in mild afternoon light. The use of a polarizing filter makes the green colors and the color of the heather appear fuller.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This tree was special, but that one??... not broken :-) Additionally, the shadow is oriented in our direction, meaning the sun is coming from in front, resulting in contrejour and unappealing light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 13:49:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
- Info created by Unknown - initially uploaded by Joalpe - restored by Wilfredor - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support In memory of the greatest TV entertainer in Brazil, Silvio Santos, who recently died in August. -- ★ 13:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you, Wilfredor and ArionStar. Silvio Santos's Wikipedia entry in Portuguese was the most viewed article during the last two weeks of August and may rank very high among the most viewed articles of 2024. I’m thrilled to see so many people collaborating on improving and disseminating this image! Thank you. --Joalpe (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merci mon cher / Obrigado meu Wilfredor (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would support the JPEG version: File:Tony Tornado e Sílvio Santos restored.jpg. Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
JPEG version
edit- Info JPEG version added. ★ 14:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't usually vote for my photos but this is not my authorship, I just did a restoration --Wilfredor (talk) 03:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--shizhao (talk) 13:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo with good posture and facial expression, solid restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Silvio Santos was known for his charismatic smile. ★ 11:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good photo, convincing restoration, natural smile. – Terragio67 (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 16:09:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Excellent sharpness, but the pose is unexceptional and the gallery has many more interesting FPs. --Tagooty (talk) 03:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If you look carefully, you'll notice a leopard laying in wait not too far from where this antelope is. Wolverine XI 17:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--shizhao (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 18:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support but too bad about the left front leg.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Litoměřice Sv Štěpán.jpg (delist), not delisted
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2024 at 17:24:51
- Info The picture was certainly once a good, outstanding photo in the 2000s, but times change and this is especially true for this photo. Today it wouldn't even be a QI. The resolution is low and yet the image appears blurred. There are various image blurs and image errors and it is also tilted. What annoys me the most is the cropping of the houses at the bottom of the picture - to me it looks arbitrary. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Fonzoyo (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist - Excellent for the age, but I don't think it meets current standards. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It would not be promoted today, but for 2008, sixteen years ago, it is a very standard quality. As the procedure for delisting is manual and long, I can't imagine nominating all the FPs promoted at this period for the reason they are not so good in 2024's. If you sharpen this picture with Topaz AI for example, it would be fine. Acceptable composition and light in my opinion.
- Look at the archives, the picture that was promoted just after this one by chronological order, is File:Lunar Crepuscular Rays 2.jpg, which is much worse, so... good luck to find them all :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Unless there’s a better photo with similar features, I would agree to delist it. However, the factor of time also plays a role. Unless we had a time machine to see how the place looked back then, I don’t think anyone can reasonably delist photos like this. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Light and composition are fine. The technical quality … well, is solid for the time of its creation. Digital photography – and especially digital cameras and lenses which are in the reach of Commons users – has come a long way since the 2000s. I don’t think we should replace our FPs repeatedly like a snake sheds its skin; let’s sort out the worst which were not great even in their time, and keep the rest which can thus serve also as a vivid history of respectable digital photography. – Aristeas (talk) 13:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep As an author of image firstly. But also there exist very great number ot Wikipedia pages, on them this image is presented for long time without any problems. -- Karelj 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Even back then, some reviewers cited technical deficiencies that are even more serious today. --Msb (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Aristeas and Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results: Result: 3 delist, 6 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cruiseschip FM217 Croisi Europe Strasbourg f, MS Victor Hugo. 15-07-2024. (actm.).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 04:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
- Info Cruise ship FM217 Croisi Europe Strasbourg f, MS Victor Hugo. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I'm not seeing the FP potential here. The colours are washed out from the harsh daytime light and there is a lot of noise where the shadows have been raised. The composition doesn't work for me either with the centred subject and abundance of foreground. BigDom (talk) 08:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could you try to rework it? It seems like the blue/cyan is missing... -- Terragio67 20:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Terragio67: Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
OpposeWeak oppose Unexceptional light and sky, sorry. Standard industrial boat. Boring background and foreground with too much flat water and dull sky. Also I agree with BigDom about thewashed out colors-- Basile Morin (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @El Golli Mohamed: @Llez: New version.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Improved, but my considerations about the framing and ordinary subject remain. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Improved, better colors. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
NeutralThe image is good now. Unfortunately, noise came out in the shadowed parts of the ship and in the sky. I'm sorry, but I think this (fixable?) issue is objectively too evident at the moment. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Terragio67: Done. Noise reduction in the shadow parts. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I like this picture. IMHO it is now acceptable even if there is still a
veryslight noise.
Weak * Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I like this picture. IMHO it is now acceptable even if there is still a
- @Terragio67: Done. Noise reduction in the shadow parts. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Monarch caterpillar (23229).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 13:16:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)
- Info Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) caterpillar eating some milkweed. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 16:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Supportǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support looks great. Nice color balance, well exposed and sharp. What kind of plant? --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's some kind of milkweed -- these caterpillars eat milkweed exclusively -- but I don't know the species. — Rhododendrites talk | 02:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice --Wilfredor (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support plante is Asclepias tuberosa --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks! Updated the file. Out of curiosity, how can you tell the species is A. tuberosa compared to the other Asclepias these butterflies are attracted to (like A. syriaca)? — Rhododendrites talk | 12:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi,
- For the genus I think I could have found it, but for the species I asked our specialists at the ''Toulouse Museum''. There are very sophisticated recognition programs that should soon arrive for the general public.
- Bonne journée et félicitations pour tes nombreux travaux que je vois souvent passer... Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Sometimes I use the iNaturalist Seek app. I didn't think to do so when the plant was in front of me, though, and it could not look past the caterpillar when I attempted to use it on my photo. :) If you remember, I'd be curious to test the software when it's available. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks! Updated the file. Out of curiosity, how can you tell the species is A. tuberosa compared to the other Asclepias these butterflies are attracted to (like A. syriaca)? — Rhododendrites talk | 12:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great pose! --Tagooty (talk) 16:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Townsend's Chipmunk 9424vv.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 04:00:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae (Squirrels)
- Info created by VJAnderson - uploaded by VJAnderson - nominated by Emdosis -- Emdosis (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Emdosis (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry. Its an adorable photo with a great pose but the image is overexposed and while the front paws on are in sharp focus, the face is not. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 04:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Needsmoreritalin --Tagooty (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Needsmoreritalin: I fixed the issues you brought up but I can't upload it. :/ Emdosis (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- I just had an issue like that. Here was the advice given to me by Radomianin If the new image is significantly different from the existing one, then a new version should be uploaded and placed with the headline template Alternative below the first image and all comments of this nomination. For example: File:New version.jpg|480x320px. However, if it is only slightly different and represents a qualitative improvement, you can update the existing photo with a new upload. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have a few versions I want to upload but I was thinking of first uploading the one that's the least different (and better quality obvs) and think it should replace the original; but I can't upload it as I'm not autopatrolled (and won't be for another 300 edits). Emdosis (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I just had an issue like that. Here was the advice given to me by Radomianin If the new image is significantly different from the existing one, then a new version should be uploaded and placed with the headline template Alternative below the first image and all comments of this nomination. For example: File:New version.jpg|480x320px. However, if it is only slightly different and represents a qualitative improvement, you can update the existing photo with a new upload. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Needsmoreritalin: I fixed the issues you brought up but I can't upload it. :/ Emdosis (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 12:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Fotoafdrukken Koninklijke Luchtmacht / Photo Prints, Royal Netherlands Air Force - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very old and extremely boring. Even waiting hours in traffic is more entertaining/interesting than this, and don't get me started about the quality. Wolverine XI 17:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Question I don’t think the second part of the above comment is appropriate. But maybe we can read its first part as a hint that the image would look rather lonely in the “Air transport” gallery. @Yann: and all others: Wouldn’t this image fit better into the “Historical” gallery? We have some similar photo there, e.g. this one. If you agree, we should change the gallery link above to Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever is standard for older aviation images. I don't mind history, given that this was taken in '42. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Changed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Chris! And sorry for not pinging you as the nominator – I wanted to ping you and Yann (because of a recent discussion about the “Historical” galleries), but somehow made a mistake and forgot your name. – Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- No worries! I check my watchlist pretty frequently – I remember the days before pings were a thing, and old habits die hard. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and representative photo of the Mosquito against a beautiful background of clouds and picturesque landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 16:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:28:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Telescopes
- Info created and uploaded by Christopher Michel, nominated by Yann
- Support High educational value and resolution, FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great image. I especially like the white snow. Wolverine XI 13:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding image. --Tagooty (talk) 01:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support +1. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nicely composed. Good exposuere and color despite the bright sun, reflective snow, you still have nice sky. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
File:20150115 SB Yemen IMG 8130.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 06:13:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Camelidae (Camelids)
- Info created and uploaded by MAGNET-foto - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 06:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Though I feel that a slightly tighter crop would benefit this image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is very bad, and the quality is...not so good. Wolverine XI 17:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The crop is good, the quality enough. -- -donald- (talk) 10:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 18:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support but per Chris Woodrich.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 17:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture and expression. – Aristeas (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 07:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the Ciuflea monastery, Chișinău, Moldova. The Moldovan Orthodox monastery was financed by Anastasie Ciufli (1801 - 1870) to respect the last will of his brother Teodor Ciufli (1796 - 1854) and is dedicated to Saint Theodore of Amasea. The two brothers were Aromanian merchants who emigrated from Macedonia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I prefer the image with noise --Wilfredor (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Maison de Castel Meur (Plougrescant).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2024 at 13:52:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by y - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Three times the cars were present and no more sea for the reflection. Gzen92 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose good image, but not outstanding enough. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 15:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice find, from my favorite country. Composition and decay. Complementary colors, leaves on the ground and on the wall, beam above the door -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition; I like such close-ups. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 10:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colours and composition work well together --Tagooty (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even though the colors (and maybe even the color contrast) seem excessive, in this situation they look fantastic to me: great job. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile, Radomianin, Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker 26 -- 2024 -- 5546-50.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 06:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
- Info created by and uploaded by and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info The ammunition depot is almost completely dark at night. A few buildings or parts of buildings (now) have some lighting. Here, the existing lighting in the bunker was switched on and the room in front of it was illuminated with two mobile lights. Nothing around the bunker is illuminated. --XRay 💬 06:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The night view with lighting makes the building look exciting and mysterious. – Aristeas (talk) 15:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Monster (Long exposure).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 10:00:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Light_trails
- Info created by ThibautRe - uploaded by ThibautRe - nominated by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info Long exposure shot of a train on the Inverted Roller Coaster "Monster" as it passes through a 270° turn -- ThibautRe (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive composition and nice color contrast in this long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, lighting and visual effect - excellent! --BigDom (talk) 11:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! Yann (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive. Wolverine XI 20:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Serra da Cantareira, Sao Paulo.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 12:01:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Brazil
- Info The image shows a street in an informal settlement in Serra da Cantareira, São Paulo. More than just a photograph, it's a window into a reality that is often overlooked. Despite the challenging conditions, with makeshift houses and narrow streets, the photo also captures everyday scenes like children playing, neighbors chatting, and clothes drying in the sun. This image encourages us to observe and understand these realities. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment To make a great photo of an ordinary subject, you need to bring something special inside. Special light, special sky, special composition, or special something. Extraordinary subjects are easier to capture, but also rarer in everyday life -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Pic is likable, but as Basile Morin said. Try with + Light (not Exposure). We can recover to support. --Mile (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Mile are very kind, I have applied the change you requested. Wilfredor (talk) 22:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, in my opinion it's not a problem of processing but of light at the beginning -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good documentation image but midday sun (13:28 according to the exif) coming from left side (according to the orientation of the shadows), creating a dull light. This is not something you can change afterwards. My eyes are caught by the wastes and litter in the water, and look for something more exciting to compensate. Unfortunately the houses are not colorful (like in Manarola for example), and seem quite ordinary with the uniform red of their standard bricks. Slightly blurry foreground (perhaps fixable with AI tools). I think Commons has many photos of this kind, featuring banal architecture and taken in the middle of the day. Perhaps at sunrise, sunset, golden hour, blue hour, or under a special sky, a stormy weather for example, or colorful clouds, the subject would appear more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine with it. Its slum, aka mess, Manarola is Lux city. Midday sometime help to avoid shadow, unless godlen hours with sun behind. Foreground is not so sharp but if you cut it some info would be lost, like chanel and drying on balcony. --Mile (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 10:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For finding a composition that works in a chaotic urban landscape worth capturing. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mile, Rhododendrites, your observations are acute and shareable. Thank you Wilfredor for your commitmentː Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Terraglo67, although the photo does not show the reality of extreme poverty, nor the dangers associated with being in this environment, such as the insecurity faced by visitors and residents, taking this photo was not easy. The insecurity in these places is high, and I have already experienced being threatened with a gun in a favela. On this occasion, thank God, it didn’t happen, but it was a quick shot: I saw the place, had a few minutes, took the photo, and left calmly. Unlike photographing a tourist destination or a European landscape, this image carries a complex background full of social, economic, and personal factors that make it much more than just a simple capture. Wilfredor (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mile, Rhododendrites, your observations are acute and shareable. Thank you Wilfredor for your commitmentː Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Basile’s statements, but the subject (a slum) relativizes our criticism; e.g., waste and litter in the water (which are normally a deficit) are an integral part of this photo. And Rhododendrites is right that the composition makes the photo special. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Souzdal Église Saint-Nicolas (Glotovo).JPG, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 15:57:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info Church of Saint Nicholas Wonderworker from the village of Glotovo in Suzdal, Suzdalsky District (Russia) - All created by me -- Pierre André Leclercq -- Pierre André (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. -- Pierre André (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose not enough sharp, why 1/1000? Ezarateesteban 22:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ezarate: Done more sharpness . Best regards Pierre André (talk) 10:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Zamek Królewski na Wawelu (1).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 17:27:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by XEvansGambitx - uploaded by XEvansGambitx - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but the quality does not satisfy me, there is noise and oversaturation, sorry. --A.Savin 18:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin plus perspective issues Ezarateesteban 22:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Bubo September 2014-5a.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 18:55:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
- Info An Eurasian eagle-owl in captivity. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot even though the harsh background. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I think the standard for captive animals is higher than this -- view from above on grass, with the bird's expression pointed down from the camera. (i.e. better if down at its level, or with a more interesting expression relative to the camera). — Rhododendrites talk | 13:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. --Kadellar (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 22:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa
- Info A juvenile yellow-crowned night heron at the Plumb Beach saltmarsh. Panorama (it stood still, so it seemed like a good opportunity to include context without sacrificing detail). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 22:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good with DOF and some creativity with pano and same focal. Bird is sharp. --Mile (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Mile --Terragio67 (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good photo of the bird in its habitat; I like the harmonious blue/yellow/brownish colours. – Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Way too far, unappealing centered composition, dull light. The image is 8469 × 6355, why not crop it to a more interesting view? --Kadellar (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at my recent uploads, I uploaded several of this bird without all the space. But we so rarely get context/habitat in the photos we promote because, in part, we're concerned with subject detail. So here is a panorama to show subject detail *and* extra space to show habitat. Whether that's appealing to enough people, we'll see, but that's the idea. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The idea of providing context is good, but this image does not do it in an exceptional way. DoF is too small, the blurred areas dominate the view. --Tagooty (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2024 at 05:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info A young man smoking a cigarette, a serene elderly man on a bicycle, an architecture enthusiast who photographs the Masini fountain sitted in Piazza del Popolo (Cesena) - Italy. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The framing arch nicely emphasizes some of the most beautiful parts of that square, and the few people add some life to the scene without diverting from the fountain and buildings. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tried some edits, to crop above till that metal stick. But made decision up to that well dressed photographer at the kafetaria and cycler, which bring much to photo. --Mile (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 02:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Laos
- Info The warm frames on the wall create an interesting impact with the light through the rectangular door, in my opinion. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is technically good but I don't see anything special to make it FP El Golli Mohamed 16:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- 💡 Lights? -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light is very good. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per El Golli Mohamed. -- Karelj (talk) 08:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is visually pleasing, but upon closer inspection, I can't find any element that breaks the feeling of looking at a carefully crafted scene for a hotel advertisement. The atmosphere, though aesthetically perfect, seems almost too flawless, leaving me with the impression that everything has been arranged to sell --Wilfredor (talk) 23:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info 100% free entrance (and welcoming team) -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, it lacks something special that makes it extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2024 at 14:41:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Ceiling of the Căpriana monastery, Căpriana, Moldova. The Eastern Orthodoxy monastery, one of the oldest in the country, was founded in 1429. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think you overdose with light/saturation, i am used to their dark ambience. 2nd option was better. --Mile (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mile: Ok, fair, I've pushed it back a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I didnt suppose you will move back. I support. Monastery is a bit different than church, i was there before. --Mile (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool --Terragio67 (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm surprised that there're no FPs from Moldova (regardless the last one of the same photographer). ★ 21:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I guess it is not the most popular destination for holidays, I had a good time, though. Poco a poco (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Rich detail --Tagooty (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful! What a picture this is! Wolverine XI 21:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 09:03:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#France
- Info Pont Napoléon that spans a canalised section of Middle River Deûle
All by Pierre André -- Pierre André (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC) - Abstain As author.-- Pierre André (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special here. It lacks sharpness and I find this one better File:Lille pont napoleon.jpg. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif is interesting, but light is dull and technic is below the FP bar. --Milseburg (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your advice. --Pierre André (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 05:49:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info This sailing boat is a transport lugger that is part of the floating section of the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico. Built in 1936 by the Rondolini shipyard of Cattolica, it is twentyone meters long and seven meters wide, it could carry one hundred and forty tons of goods. The advent of motor boats in the 1930s-40s led to the disappearance of the transport lugger as a merchant vessel. Nowadays, it can be visited by making a reservation at the Museum which is located 20 meters from the boat. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice — Rhododendrites talk | 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good focus and depth of field, well exposed, great refelection. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing composition and good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 15:46:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is FP for sure, but there is something in the photo processing that generates a low quality photo, the details have been lost, I don't know if it is the automatic development of the camera to JPG but there is a combination of low export quality --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Easy there big fella; we all see you and your apricots ;). Wolverine XI 21:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't get for that square, before. I think you could use a little bit less sharpening; all horn of buffalo and some halo-especially on bottom (stomach/grass border). --Mile (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting. The wear on the horns, the bald spots on the flanks, the cloudy left eye. Your image tells a story in addition to its aesthetic high value. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect hooks for towels, these horns :-) Nice beast in his natural environment. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Azure Icicle Chandelier.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 22:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info created by Tydmiz - uploaded by Tydmiz - nominated by Tydmiz -- Tydmiz (talk) 22:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tydmiz (talk) 22:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment categorize the nomination please Ezarateesteban
- Comment Because Tydmiz is new to this page (welcome to the FPC page, Tydmiz!), I have added the gallery link as a little help. – Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting subject and I like the shallow-ish depth of field that allows us to see the details of the chandelier without being distracted by details in the background. That said, I do think there is a little too much background here that could be cropped. Overall, this is pretty good for a smartphone image and not a million miles away from FP standard. BigDom (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Matryoshka from Hungary.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 12:42:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Toys
- Info Matryoshka from Hungary. Created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Withdrawn without a justification. -- ★ 12:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clear image of the nesting dolls, good overall focus, well lite, no distractions. Well composed and executed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Chama lazarus (Lazarus jewel box), featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 11:49:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Chamidae
- Info The representatives of the genus Chama live with their left valve firmly cemented to a hard surface. This adhesion point can be clearly seen on the left valve; it differs in the absence of typical shell structures such as spines or lamellae; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 11:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1950-1959
- Info created by Associated Press, uploaded by Lemonreader, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic picture, FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Haven't I seen this before? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverine XI (talk • contribs) 14:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Is the most recent version really any higher resolution? It looks like it may have just had the size increased digitally? — Rhododendrites talk | 12:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was scrutinized and promoted on English WP, so it think it is OK. Lemonreader has not edited here since 2022, but I will let a message on enwiki. Yann (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
OpposeI would love original to stay, one person went missing here. At least. But his shoes are there :==== --Mile (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. Yann (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: see square --Mile (talk) 16:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Would it be OK if the shoe is removed? Yann (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Not sure, I would like to keep original. Its iconic image. --Mile (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Yes, but the man doesn't bring anything. In fact, seeing that he is very dark and more than half hidden, removing him entirely makes sense. So I removed the shoe, and the disturbing light, at the upper right. Yann (talk) 19:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support OK, i didnt know i vote on English, but yes. I striked at least, but i still try to see original as original, and then lets make own copy and edit. For old film shots. --Mile (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC) p.S. And how is possible not to know author of such image ?
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I completely understand the urge to remove the cropped shoe and lamp (and I would do so if this was my own photo), but this is a historic(al) and even iconic photo, therefore I think we should not make any substantial edits to it and I must oppose the edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Delias eucharis (Drury, 1773) - Indian Jezebel (Female) WLB.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 12:41:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support True photomodel this yellow. --Mile (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support This image looks like it was taken in a light box. Even lighting, the subject is in good focus, you can see the texture on the wings. Beautiful bokeh. Wonderfully composed and captured. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely beautiful. It’s a pity that the masking of the background is a bit rough in some places; see e.g. at the stem of the flower and between its filaments; improving the mask would make the photo perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 09:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llez (talk • contribs) 12:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
File:حجم شجرة أرز مقارنة بحجم الإنسان.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 10:30:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose An impressive tree, but unfortunaltely a bad crop and not very sharp --Llez (talk) 11:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Llez: the crop is particularly unfortunate, and the resolution is too low. It's a pity, because the subject is very well presented. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Tight crop -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Echeveria A7CR 02866-90 zsp.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Crassulaceae
- Info A focus-stacked close-up of an Echeveria succulent, the image is about 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm (1.38 in × 0.98 in) in size. There is only 1 FP of this genus and none at this magnification. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice color balance. Image captures the texture of the Echeveria and the tooth-like structures could provide inspiration for a sequel to little shop of horrors. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of karst mountains, wooden houses, trees and mist in a paddy field of Vang Vieng Laos (2).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 15:17:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This makes me miss SE Asia. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The big featureless bank of clouds spoils the composition for me. --Tagooty (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral for me the photo is messy. There is a bit of everything, an old settlement, a fence, sad clouds, a mountain and gray water. Depressing for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Light and colours are rather muted, but I like how the clouds at the top hide the upper part of the mountains and correspond to the water in the foreground. – Aristeas (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I understand the idea of capturing the entire landscape along with the lake and the mountains, very beautifull, however, dull colors, lack of light, the area where the dog and the chickens are looks blurry or out of focus. I think there is too much lake, the composition would have been better if it was centered on the house with the animals and only a small portion of the river. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Very atmospheric photo. I like it. However, the composition would be much stronger if half of the boring cloud on top was cut off. Anyway, i Support. -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your constructive review and support. Interesting idea. Now it's a bit late for an alternative but I may renominate such a version another day if this one doesn't pass -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 02:09:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#South_Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice twilight picture but I personally miss the wow effect.--Ermell (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Same here, brother. Wolverine XI 13:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, I miss the definition of the so-called "wow effect". RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Good quality, but it feels random, like a street view picture
- Oppose An ordinary street scene. --Tagooty (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 04:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Seed formation of a Verbena hastata. Focus stack of 50 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support One important task of photography is to show people that some things they see everyday without really looking at them can be very interesting and beautiful; your plant photos are excellent examples for that task. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende 01.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 00:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light! ★ 21:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose good image, but not sufficiantly special. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Young Coati.png, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 22:53:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Procyonidae_(Raccoons_and_Allies)
- Info There are currently no FPs of the genus Nasua. Created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture, excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas cute subject. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support that is...adorable, to say the least. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be jpg --Wilfredor (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Rat des sables diurne Boughrara.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Muridae (Murids)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would have liked to see him sniffing a flower or dancing, but I'm happy to see him meditating. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support With a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support As Aristeas said. There is an ethereal quality to this image with soft foreground and background elements creating something of a bokeh vignette. Meanwhile, the subject is in good lighting with sharp detail. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
- Info Stained glass dome in the Royal Portuguese Cabinet of Reading, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality and interesting perspective. BigDom (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A stunning place. The author wanted to show the beautiful galleries with their innummerable books, the chandelier, and the glass dome — all in a single photo. This is much and has led to an unusal, somewhat forced perspective which unavoidably causes significant distortions; personally I may have preferred separate photos of the various elements; but I must also admit that the result is exciting and impressive, and the difficult contrast between very dark and very bright elements has been handled successfully, so IMHO the photo deserves the star. Wilfredor has carefully reduced the noise and improved the sharpness, thanks for that. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:070 Dark-capped bulbul at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Pycnonotidae (Bulbuls)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support sharp photo, evenly exposed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High-quality bird image. Wolverine XI 20:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also very nice composition, reminds me of the beautiful painted illustrations in some old biology books. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture! High level of detail, good focus and interesting action -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 12:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main altar and tabernacle of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kudos to the responsible people for the tasteful lighting; kudos to Poco for the excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
- Info Warsaw Presidential Palace, with the statue of Jozef Poniatowski in front. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support verticals need fix, see the windows in the right side --Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Will fix shortly. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites talk | 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! Wilfredor (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Stitching prpblems in the roof, see note. Not sure about CAs. Motif is great. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh nooo. Ok thanks for the note; I'll fix tomorrow. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination It doesn't look like I'll have time to properly fix this quickly, so withdrawing and will renominate later. Thanks, all. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
post-withdrawal votes
|
---|
|
File:Plac Konstytucji Warsaw 2022 aerial.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 00:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's undoubtedly a useful pic, but no FP for me. Because of chromatic aberrations and perspective distortion I would not even promote it as QI. And overall the composition seems a bit unbalanced, with the harsh shadow at the right, the scaffold-like structure at the bottom. Sorry --A.Savin 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin --Tagooty (talk) 01:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- Karelj (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Jaws movie poster.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 13:56:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
- Info created by Roger Kastel, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic film poster. Due to copyright, very few documents from this period. -- Yann (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support the movie is free too? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. You need to pay some cash. Wolverine XI 20:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary movie poster for its era. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 20:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, the second bird isn't sharp and not in focus Ezarateesteban 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree – worst case be the second bird can be cropped. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some px on both side would be helpfull, especially on right side since that bird is in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Agree with Mile. And definitely don't crop -- the photo is about a confrontation. Regarding sharpness of the egret, it is in a middle-ground area where it would be better for it to be blurrier or sharper, but I enjoy the drama of the heron's pose. All-in-all that brings me to neutral. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The main subject is the heron so I have no problem with the egret beeing out of focus. Also I think that the egret adds to the scene because it's looking at the heron -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice focus control. ★ 01:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 22:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Raimundo Madrazo - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like at least one error added in the restoration process. Added a note. In a couple other places it looks like a mark may have been modified rather than removed. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Rhododendrites: fixed the annotation you did and anothers I found, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 06:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
- Info 101 year old Högalidskyrkan in winter. No FP of this church in Stockholm. All by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too soft and too much sky --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but a common motif. I also agree with Uoae1.--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice light as Ermell says, but I also agree that the composition and sharpness are not up to FP level, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thank you everyone for the constructive criticism. Will be back with other candidates :) -- ThibautRe (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:منزل على واد بوزنيقة.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 10:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Chromatic abberations everywhere... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical it doesn't meet the FP standards. Motf is not that breathtaking.--Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The colors are gorgeous but the picture is quite noisy and a bit soft. Sorry. -- ThibautRe (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's like starring into a wall; nothing exciting about that. Wolverine XI 20:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Pflerscher Scharte.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info Gschnitzer Tribulaun and Goldkappl seen from the Pflerscher Scharte, Stubai Alps, Tyrol, border Austria/Italy. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition, interesting mountains. Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Yann, well depicted, interesting point of view. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good exposure, the image captures the texture of the subject and documents the glacial striation on the peak behind it. What is the obelisk, what is on the plaque, and what kind of bird is soaring above? --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't climp to the plaque and the pyramid and unfortunally I don't know anything about birds. Milseburg (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I was just playing about the bird. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't climp to the plaque and the pyramid and unfortunally I don't know anything about birds. Milseburg (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 22:19:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The entire decoration of the apse dates back to around the mid-6th century (549 consecration). This picture was created by stitching 32 photographs, 4 rows and 8 columns. As it is a very large image, it's easier to browse it with ZoomViewer. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but technically not perfect due to strange camera settings. Did you use a tripod?!--Uoaei1 (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Inside the basilica it is forbidden to use the tripod. Yes, you're right, camera settings chosen are not ideal. I tried to perform the only possible parameters with the Canon lens available to me for photography, trying to keep my hand still and photographing several photos. The bright parts (enlightened by the two windows at the top) are very beautiful, however the ones in the shade are not perfect, which fortunately are at the edges of the photo... To conclude, the good thing is that the mosaic tiles which measure between 1⁄2 and 1 inch square, can almost all be seen quite well, because I positioned myself at an appropriate distance in the center of the basilica, 30 meters from the apse mosaic, also considering the height of the ceiling which is 30 metres too. Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Uoaei1 thanks for your support, when I am allowed to use a tripod, I will try a new composition. I withdraw my nomination Terragio67 (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Inside the basilica it is forbidden to use the tripod. Yes, you're right, camera settings chosen are not ideal. I tried to perform the only possible parameters with the Canon lens available to me for photography, trying to keep my hand still and photographing several photos. The bright parts (enlightened by the two windows at the top) are very beautiful, however the ones in the shade are not perfect, which fortunately are at the edges of the photo... To conclude, the good thing is that the mosaic tiles which measure between 1⁄2 and 1 inch square, can almost all be seen quite well, because I positioned myself at an appropriate distance in the center of the basilica, 30 meters from the apse mosaic, also considering the height of the ceiling which is 30 metres too. Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Mandarin duck (21926).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 01:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
- Info Sleepy male mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) in eclipse plumage (outside of breeding season). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love him Henrysz (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Msb (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Saint Peter's Baldachin.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 21:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Angle and composition don't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
- Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas and well handled. Panorama-stitching can be very tough, but this result is top tier. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Plac Wilsona Warsaw 2022 aerial.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 14:21:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose OK, I'm going to go ahead and FPX this one, but as you're a new nominator, I'll give you some tips. 1) Feature Pictures are among the very best that exist on Commons, a tiny percentage of the millions of pictures on the site. In order to make it, the image either has to show something truly significant, like a famous person or event, or be of exceptional technical quality - sometimes both. Only nominate your very best images for this category. 2) It may be a good idea to first get some feedback over at QIC. As you can see from the process there, this image is not likely to succeed even there; the points of the low resolution and quality being mentioned. If an image succeeds in becoming a QI, then perhaps consider nominating it for FP. Best of luck. --Peulle (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the quality is too low to have a chance of reaching FP status.--Peulle (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Close wing puddling position of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail WLB MG 2022.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per below. --Zzzs (talk) 22:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. Good effort but not quite there. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shallow DoF is IMO fine here seeing subject is in focus. Superb composition and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing puddling of Dilipa morgiana (Westwood, 1851) - Golden Emperor WLB MG 3490.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I had no access to the file lately and so I thought that I had done the 11/12 that I sometimes do but guess what I just checked and I didn't even do it on this picture! The original file size when exported out of Lightroom was only 13.7 MB (max setting). But after applying Denoise and Sharpen, the file size always increases in unecessary proportion, which then led the file to beeing 25.2 MB. After Denoise and Sharpen it always changes very slightly the overall color of the image making it a +1 greener in the green-violet spectrum so I always cancel with Lightroom making it a +1 more violet again and reexporting (in max setting) which then made this file of 16.11 MB that was finally not even compressed. Moral of the story : it's just Denoise and Sharpen that add unnecessary weight to the file and that get's deleted anyway when making any export at max setting with Lightroom or Photoshop -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- It must be the sharpening and not the denoise, since the latter process removes pixels rather than adds them. The images I applied denoise to using Topaz Denoise always decreased in size, but when you apply AI sharpening, it adds details that aren’t in the original photo. However, to the human eye, it appears as added sharpness, drawing from its knowledge of similar images and generating a more detailed and larger image. The color space also generates larger images depending on which one you choose, also make sure to set a high ppi number like 300 Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- After first Lightroom export : 13.7 MB. After Sharpen : 24.3 MB. After DeNoise : 25.2 MB. After Lightroom color correction : 16.11 MB. Conclusion : both Denoise and Sharpen make the file weigh more than it should and a Lightroom export in 100% quality removes the unnecessary file weight. I think it's just that Lightroom/Photoshop know better then Topaz how to export at 100% without unnecessary file weight. For example if you write in the source code "#FFFFFF #FFFFFF" for two pixels it takes more space than writing "2x#FFFFFF" while both give the same result -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- It must be the sharpening and not the denoise, since the latter process removes pixels rather than adds them. The images I applied denoise to using Topaz Denoise always decreased in size, but when you apply AI sharpening, it adds details that aren’t in the original photo. However, to the human eye, it appears as added sharpness, drawing from its knowledge of similar images and generating a more detailed and larger image. The color space also generates larger images depending on which one you choose, also make sure to set a high ppi number like 300 Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I had no access to the file lately and so I thought that I had done the 11/12 that I sometimes do but guess what I just checked and I didn't even do it on this picture! The original file size when exported out of Lightroom was only 13.7 MB (max setting). But after applying Denoise and Sharpen, the file size always increases in unecessary proportion, which then led the file to beeing 25.2 MB. After Denoise and Sharpen it always changes very slightly the overall color of the image making it a +1 greener in the green-violet spectrum so I always cancel with Lightroom making it a +1 more violet again and reexporting (in max setting) which then made this file of 16.11 MB that was finally not even compressed. Moral of the story : it's just Denoise and Sharpen that add unnecessary weight to the file and that get's deleted anyway when making any export at max setting with Lightroom or Photoshop -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit distorted, but IMO a dynamic and well composed photograph that shows this church well. Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the colours and the leading lines. Maybe not obviously that wow-y, but still good IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 19:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:MarkTwain.LOC.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure why I would want to support something that the nominator does not think is FP and not sure why the nomination has been created hoping that another user will spare the time to fix it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I started restoring this, but there is much more work than I initially thought. So it will still take more time, probably too late for this nomination. Yann (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Awesome action shot Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support So many of your photos have a really picturesque, painterly touch and this is no exception. Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Lesser Nighthawk Sleeping SPI.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support So cute El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:LHD plasma vacuum vessel.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Stricking image but the out of focus portion on the upper right is too distracting. Sorry. Also, IMHO too strong contrast (there are both burnt whites and pitch blacks) and a bit small. --C messier (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cool abstract and was worth a try, but a bit small and not convinced by the strong contrast and blown highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Li Phi falls with colorful sky from elevated zip line platform at sunset in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exquisite Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support well done! The jagged texture of the rocks contrasts with the cotton of the water. Well composed and executed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful scene, and I love both the large area with water and islands in the background and tiny details like the things at the tree in the foreground (what’s hanging there?). – Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fishing nets! Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 08:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Kartause Gaming Laterne 01.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin, but the framing is a bit too large in my view Still better too large than too tight :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool minimalism. Very sharp and good composition. I agree with Basile about the framing but not enough to oppose. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Chelydra serpentina 2017 G1.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dragon? --Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Missing location --A.Savin 15:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, where was this picture taken? Poco a poco (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ukraine, Vinnytsia. Exotic animals exhibition -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Exotic animals exhibition"? That's not nice... --A.Savin 20:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Why not? We have many FP from zoos. In this photo the background look like natural, not distracting, the animal's behavior is natural -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I presume that in these temporary or touring exhibitions, they treat the animals worse than in a zoo. --A.Savin 17:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stricking image (please improve description and add a location category). --C messier (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If you didn't say that you shot this at an exhibit, I wouldn't think it was shot through glass. Well exposed for an animal in a tank, good detail. It provides the viewer with a unique perspective of a snapper. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:32:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while this is a pretty motif and a good photograph, it is tilted and some way short of FP sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 20:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I am sorry too, Mounir. The ISO is high, the shutter speed is more than ample for a 50mm lens, but f/32 creates a lot of diffraction, and its amplified by the APS-C sensor on the camera. The birds are not in sharp focus, nor are the people or the homes. The colors look wonderful. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose WB, rotation. --Mile (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: in view of above comments, there is no chance to be a FP. Yann (talk) 21:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high resolution, good focus, feeling of space with this large background -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, a clear FP.--Peulle (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Woah. This is one of the best images of an African antelope I've ever seen. Everything is timed to perfection. Huge congratulations to the photographer of this high-caliber, educational, and valuable piece of art. Wolverine XI 15:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support of course Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture. Sharp focus, even lighting, the perspective works well as the grasslands rise in the background to the horizon, which presents a nice juxtaposition with the cream colored grasses against the blue. If there were anything to adjust, perhaps a slight crop from the right to make the subject appear to have a little more distance in the direction the subject is heading. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
- Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not everything was spectacular at this time, and not all the craftmen were prodigies like Michael Angelo :-) Ordinary architectural element in my view (also for the period). Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Am I mispercieving this or is the image tinted yellow? Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. I can possibly make the photo a little less yellow.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2024(UTC)
- @Henrysz: I have reduced the yellow color, Thanks for your comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Basile this time. Good QI and nice colours but IMO not outstanding enough for FP, an interesting motif but far from an extraordinary one. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 22:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Please check the crop at the left, some background is visible --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, it is hard to recognize on a white background, I have fixed it.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) - Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be a bit sharper, but v picturesque and lovely Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Phare du Paon (Île-de-Bréhat) (3).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little bit dark but interesting and high quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 12:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Places
- Info created by Antonio Thomás Koenigkam Oliveira - uploaded by Simtegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Image quality is fine. I don't understand the reason for black and white though, especially when the sky is so featureless and lacking in contrast. I like these pictures looking upwards at skyscrapers and tall buildings but I think this one lacks a strong composition and that the little bits of streetlamps poking in at the edges of the frame detract from the image. Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 19:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing and clearly FP to me. Very sharp on the building. Lovely light and colours. I think there is possibly a point in that this is the duller side of the castle to photograph and a lot of it is featureless wall. But still very good and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are too many visible artificial transitions between sharp and blurry areas. Probably from merging two images or two layers (original and sharpened). I would be OK with using software to adjust sharpness, but the transitions are too artificial. Also, there is a lot of color noise on the castle and roof, probably created by increasing the sharpness. The light makes the picture too flat and not very interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynx1211 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Moulin de Moidrey (1).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#France
- Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the original more balanced. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful golden light. Per Radomianin and Cmao20 I prefer the wide version. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
edit- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the [internal mosaic of the apse] where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Would be support if I'd not seen the original but it's just better. In the original we have the gentle sweep across the scene with the trees getting larger and drawing the eye towards the basilica, plus the carved animal figures all pointing in the same direction that give a sense of movement as we look across the frame. The alternative lacks any of this and feels comparatively static. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info A risky nomination and I don't know what you'll think to this. But there is something about the composition that I find really interesting and I like it more the longer I look at it. I think it's the warm and inviting light, the leading lines from the sweep of the road and the brickwork, the rich colours, and the contrast between the almost aggresive regularity of the brickwork and the repeating patterns in the roofs, compared with the somewhat eclectic architecture of the house. Anyway, it's subtle, but this is IMO a really good example of how to shoot a street in a small town. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – I like the composition, I find it arresting. —Bruce1eetalk 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. At the first glance I am not that happy about some of the elements (e.g. the walls at the right), but the short telephoto perspective (70mm) combines all them to a really convicing composition. It’s often very difficult to find satisfying compositions in small city streets, and this is indeed a greaat example. – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Where to focus ? Nothing special for FP. --Mile (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The overall picture is attractive to me, also because the trees are bare.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I understand your doubts and respect your work. But no wow for me, sorry. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special for me either. Wolverine XI 08:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special for me either. -- Karelj (talk) 07:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah there's no real wow factor with this image for me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 10:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I take it back, it has wow for me but this was probably not a well considered nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to say no to JWST Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, especially the red center that reminds me of a crystal. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 19:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info Side view of the Church of Saint Francis of Assisi, a example of modernist architecture designed by Oscar Niemeyer, and partial view of Lake Pampulha, an artificial lake constructed in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. In July 2016, the Pampulha Modern Ensemble was declared an UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created and uploaded by Jani Pereira - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A rather grainy picture of a dull building. Lack of definition and sharpness, and dull light. Cmao20 (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality is too poor for FP. Wolverine XI 08:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok. ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good for me considering high resolution and high pixel level detail. I feel like if we say this one isn't good enough, we are getting close to mandating focus-stacking for this kind of image. There is a bit of colour noise but it's not enough to put me off too much. Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose with respect to the author who has presented at least a high quality QI, but I don't think 'considering it was taken from a cell phone' is the right attitude. Either it's good enough for FP or it's not, we shouldn't make allowances for the quality of equipment. I love the motif but I'm not convinced by the level of detail at this relatively small resolution (less than 6 megapixels) and I don't think the bottom crops in the corners are perfect. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Cmao20
- Thank you for your feedback. I acknowledge the points you've made about the quality. If the image has the potential to become a featured picture, I commit to returning to the location to capture it again using a Nikon camera. As for the cropping, Here is an overview of the building. Please share any suggestions you might have for a better crop. Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice - an old photo that really feels like you can step inside it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice document of the old Paris, before Haussman. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Museo della Marineria di Cesenatico - Sezione galleggiante - Barche storiche - 2024-09-18 19-09-09 001.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 19:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
- Info In the center is the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico, on the left you can see the historic boats of the Adriatic Sea, the only floating museum in Italy located on the oldest and most evocative part of the Leonardo's canal port of Cesenatico. This Museum Is the custodian of the maritime history of sailing boats coming from the north of the Adriatic Sea. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, colorful -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Chernilevsky.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per George. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 04:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 07:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Coordinates and English description should be added. --Milseburg (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I want to support. I just found an issue to fix bottom rigth, see note. --Milseburg (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Lupa Capitolina, Rome.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With respect to the original photograph, there are some artifacts introduced by removing the background: the tail shows a double contour, what seems a casting defects has been removed from the right-hand leg, and three cusps are present below the neck. I added three notes about them. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done thanks Wilfredor (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Reminded me of this, pretty hilarious! --Gnosis (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me of my Latin book, back then :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar 03.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 09:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info High altar at the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, around 1490. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even the windows are not (partially) burned.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Κούνος DJI 4601.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 12:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- An aerial view of Kounos, Mani, Greece, a village populated with tower houses, some up to five stories high, built by families to protect them from thieves or hostile families. Support -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent overview of that picturesque village, and the sun illuminates it like a spotlight. – Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 21:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Yerpo Eh? 19:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 08:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support View point and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good one. Nice colours, composition + sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
- Info I love the golden winter lighting in this photo of a lesser known religious building. Created by Саня Новиков - uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support according to the nomination statement. // Welcome back, Cmao20! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great find – I’m happy we have you back here as nominator, Cmao20! – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I had some laptop trouble plus a major contract at work. But I never mean to leave, it just sort of happens. Will always come back after a break. Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the shadows and the light. Subtle and pretty. Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias galba (Wallace, 1867) - Indian Orange Albatross WLB.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:40:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info create, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Battle of Sutjeska Memorial Monument.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Superb subject, great interplay of light and shadows, but I must agree with Basile that the top crop is very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Mixed-breed dogs in Serles.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP-standards in my heavily biased opinion. Wolverine XI 15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- all the opinions are welcome :) Wilfredor (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and please do not lower the highlights on the snow - snow should be this blindingly white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The higher perspective works here to really add depth to the image. The dog doesn't seem to be afraid of heights. The sun on the dog's face provides warmth in an otherwise cold image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good dog picture but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
((o))
intentionally? (With(())
your vote has no defined meaning.) Just asking, because in the end somebody must count the votes … – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Sometimes round versus curly brackets are a struggle for me…😊. Thank you for your comment. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
- Support Beautiful environmental portait of a proud creature. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Visibly heavily JPEG artefacted (see her neck and chin - compression artefacts are v obvious). Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The grayscale works so well with this portrait and adds drama. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done portrait, matches the character of some of her songs very well. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose As Cmao20 said, the artifacts are just too prominent for my taste --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud pudding position of Delias hyparete (Linnaeus, 1758) - Painted Jezebel WLB IMG 1197.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 19:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Thamblyok - uploaded by Thamblyok - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good composition, quality and colours, however the damage to the wing is a bit of a shame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support You know, you could just go to the page history and thank them there instead of repeating the same thing for each support vote. --Zzzs (talk) 14:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 16:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Lybiidae (African_Barbets)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Atudu (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing colors. Yann (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice stance. Wolverine XI 20:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 09:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like this photo and feel it should be highlighted. I saw the light coming through the window and thought, "WOW, those rays of light are beautiful." But then I moved up to the top right corner and noticed how light pollution prevents the details of the wall fresco from being visible (it looks washed out). I think this can be fixed in Lightroom (something opposite to the process of correcting vignetting). --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful religious space. I could quibble about a couple of things e.g. the top crop but I am willing to accept them as part of the compromises needed to capture this lovely space in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Request The perspective is a bit distorted, I don't know if it's beacause the building is not exactly symmetrical or because the camera was leaning a bit more to the left than it should. Can this be corrected? --Lynx1211 (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I made some perspective improvements, Lynx1211. FYI, too Mile. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral It is much better, thank you. However, some perspective issues reimaned. Currently, the top part of the image is leaning to the top right corner. I played with the original photo so I know it could be improved a bit ;-) Also there is a lot of color noise and artifacts after using an AI tool to improve the sharpness. Is there any Wiki policy on that? I believe such edits can be at least made less obvious :-) Lynx1211 (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I made some perspective improvements, Lynx1211. FYI, too Mile. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you get crop above, to clear chopred Saint ? --Mile (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seeing candlebars ane around, you did a lot "looking for center". I dislike Saint above is cut, instead you could crop candlebears and save Saint. Distortion. --Mile (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 04:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Inflorescence of a Verbena bonariensis. Focus stack of 29 photos. The plant blooms from July until autumn with fragrant flowers that attract many butterflies.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 17:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely colors. Wolverine XI 20:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Дубровицы 2024.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 18:39:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#Architecture#Exteriors
- Info Wiki Loves Monuments contest participant. Created - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Any translation possible? And please correct the geo coding, it is obviously wrong. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I added an English caption. Beautiful picture of an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saw it on IQ, said this must pass FP. Nice image. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great picture if there weren't these foreground trees. Yann (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Leaning in slightly, but still OK. --C messier (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Colors seem a little too saturated and overall, the image appears dark. Consider lightening to increase detail in the mid-tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Close but IMO not quite FP based on my comments above. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per GRDN117. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. Wolverine XI 20:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 17:04:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Apologies but the amount of noise, the low depth of field, and the lack of definition and sharpness on the bird mean that this is some way short of FP, even though the composition is good. I'd recommend you have a look at similar pictures recently promoted in the gallery to get an idea of the image quality required of FP wildlife photos. Cmao20 (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose and also not enough space on all sides. Yann (talk) 17:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: see voter's comments, especially Cmao20's | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 21:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
- Info Panoramic view (cylindrical projection) of the interior of Bad Traunstein parish church, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is amazing, really well done Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High technical quality.--Peulle (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Are there no Copright problems in Austria with contemporary art in interiors? Unfortunately, the creator is not mentioned anywhere.--Ermell (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I am no copyright expert. The question for me is whether a church is a public place or not. At least, I am not aware of issues for images like this. Uoaei1 (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- And finally: this image has been checked without concerns by the team of WikiDaheim / WLM in Austria contest executed by Wikimedia Austria. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's the way it is in Germany. I'm not a copyright expert either. Just a question. Thanks for the answer. Impressive photo.--Ermell (talk) 07:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 12:14:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Light trails
- Info created by Daniel Monteiro danielmonteirox - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Cool motif but not sure about image quality and composition. Particularly I find the crop very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nikon D7000? No quality? ★ 16:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't say none, I said IMO insufficient for FP. The picture is not very sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- What makes a D7000 take unsharp photos? ★ 17:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Could be lots of things - any kind of camera movement during the 25s exposure, noise reduction during post-processing, diffraction from the f/16 aperture that was probably excessive on an APS-C sensor like the D7000's. BigDom (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor, poor quality. Definitely not what you want to see in any Featured Picture Candidate. Wolverine XI 19:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I quite like it as a photograph but unfortunately I do agree with the others that the technical side is not quite FP standard. BigDom (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think the composition quite works here.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 13:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
- Info created by Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Luara Baggi) - uploaded by Luiz79 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice textures. -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Cool textures for sure but so little of the image is actually sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low DoF and there appears to be motion blur in some places.--Peulle (talk) 10:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle and also badly underexposed IMO, sorry. BigDom (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks interesting at first sight, but per other opposers --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --Zzzs (talk) 01:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
File:046 Fischer's lovebird in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 07:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittaculidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and worth pointing out that this is the only QI of this species on Commons, so it is probably the best free-license photo of this bird. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Blends in nicely. Wolverine XI 05:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Hirundo rustica Ormoz.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Hirundinidae (Swallows)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Finely painted wooden ceiling of Jibokjae Hall seen from below at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 20:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif, colours, and image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Schneespitze (Stubaier Alpen).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sharp image, great color contrast between the deep blue of the sky and the rust tinged rocks. Seems a little bit over sharpened at full resolution. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure WB is fine, but noise for sure. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a view! Wolverine XI 08:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Traditional hanok house with wooden doors along a steeply sloping street in Bukchon Hanok Village Seoul.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 20:47:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice interplay of light and shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clear shot. --Mile (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Amistad - Jef Leempoels-restored.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 19:46:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Jef Leempoels - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment the restoration procedure has deleted some wrinkles on the sleeve of the black jacket, while they are visible in the original picture. On the contrary, you have done a very good job on most of the other parts of the painting. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2024 at 11:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose All of those tents and garbage bags ruin the impression for me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- hello dear they are not garbage : they are cans for waters and tools to challenge a long hiking in the Tassili n'Ajjer plateau. It is a camp view. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose For a camping view, this is too dark, and for the natural scenery, camping equipment is in the way. --Tmv (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination thank you all i ll do better next time IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
File:View from Tegelberg 02.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version is a considerable improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Weak support Agree with Cmao20... --Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well done, Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The haze makes the scene a bit too soft, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 10:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 14:35:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution of a poster of the 1900 Paris World Fair. -- Yann (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, I can't view it in full size but it looks very sharp at 6000px across. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Lavaux Switzerland.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 17:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
- Info No FPs of this picturesque and well-known place. Bit of noise on the hills but I don't mind when the composition and light are this good. created by Elpi77 - uploaded by Elpi77 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I miss coordinates and EXIF data. Not sure whether it's a drone photo. If it is, it should be categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But see comment from A.Savin.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added coordinates, but there's not a lot I can do about EXIF. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your effort.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, how do you come to this geolocation? Either the photographer was standing on the ground -- but then, looking at Google streetview, I don't think this location is correct (see the slopes at the left). Or this is indeed an aerial/drone shot -- but then not only this location is possible and without EXIF and response from the photographer we never can be sure, right? --A.Savin 22:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did almost exactly the same photo a few years ago with same lighting, same time of the day and of the year and exact same place (but with more snow on the mountains) and I can confirm it's Rivaz and that this picture can only be taken with a drone -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't question the town in the picture. It's more about precise camera location: if there's no EXIF data and we cannot expect a statement from the photographer, then we can only estimate: use {{Location estimated}}. --A.Savin 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Camera location appearing on the file right now is wrong (46° 28′ 27.27″ N, 6° 47′ 38.71″ E) and suggesting it would be Saint-Saphorin, which is not the case (it's Rivaz). Right camera (drone) location with only 10-20m margin error is 46°28'38.0"N 6°46'36.4"E -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, now that makes sense IMO, thanks. Support --A.Savin 16:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Camera location appearing on the file right now is wrong (46° 28′ 27.27″ N, 6° 47′ 38.71″ E) and suggesting it would be Saint-Saphorin, which is not the case (it's Rivaz). Right camera (drone) location with only 10-20m margin error is 46°28'38.0"N 6°46'36.4"E -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't question the town in the picture. It's more about precise camera location: if there's no EXIF data and we cannot expect a statement from the photographer, then we can only estimate: use {{Location estimated}}. --A.Savin 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did almost exactly the same photo a few years ago with same lighting, same time of the day and of the year and exact same place (but with more snow on the mountains) and I can confirm it's Rivaz and that this picture can only be taken with a drone -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 13:11:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main nave of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, as usual Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Morocco
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support The corner at the bottom ... :-( --XRay 💬 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @XRay, Cmao20 If you ask me, i would put even a bit higher. Bottom nothing while above nice crafting. Lost complete V, but... --Mile (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I've taken the liberty of refining the gallery link with the parameter #Morocco. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 00:31:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely facade and nostalgic 80s look. The slope of the street not only causes discomfort, but also inevitably draws my gaze to the white line and the dirt accumulated on the pavement. Despite the many eye-catching elements of the facade, the place fails to stand out against the visual distractions of the building behind it. However, what really makes feel bad is the complete absence of people at the entrance, giving the impression of a place abandoned or on the verge of closing. Additionally, the crooked white sign on the right distracts. In summary, many elements, but none strong enough. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good selfportrait Frank, i would support if you clean a bit of CA. Annoted. --Mile (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- CA correction was turned on during the development; I don't see any in the uploaded file. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good picture (but is it me or is it tilted?) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- In order to avoid tilt, I routinely use the level on the back screen of my camera. I also double-ckecked for tilt after running a perspective correction on Capture One (which is usually pretty precise). The slight slope of the street and the white centerline might cause this impression. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I thought, thank you for the clarification! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- In order to avoid tilt, I routinely use the level on the back screen of my camera. I also double-ckecked for tilt after running a perspective correction on Capture One (which is usually pretty precise). The slight slope of the street and the white centerline might cause this impression. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Anyway. --Mile (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 09:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Morocco
- Info Ksar Aït Benhaddou, Marocco (أيت بن حدو، المغرب). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition + colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tmv (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great vibrance and composition. Terragio67 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Your shot is a beautiful shot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link with the parameter #Morocco. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment OK Radomianin, i saw before its not there yet, wanted to put when it passed but supose it will so thanx. --Mile (talk) 09:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message, Mile. You are right, the section did not exist before. But since it is foreseeable that this nomination will be successful, I created the section. This will make it easier to maintain after the nomination is over. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info all by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link: ...#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies). Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by unknown photographer from the Auschwitz Erkennungsdienst, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info "Selection" of Hungarian Jews on the ramp at Auschwitz-II-Birkenau in German-occupied Poland, May/June 1944, during the final phase of the Holocaust. Jews were sent either to work or to the gas chamber. The photograph is part of the collection known as the Auschwitz Album, which was donated to Yad Vashem by Lili Jacob, a survivor, who found it in the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp in 1945. See Auschwitz Album, Yad Vashem: "The Auschwitz Album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau."
- Support Historical image with high educational value, restored. FP on English Wikipedia. -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a very important testimony that should be promoted because of its significance to contemporary history. The technical quality should be disregarded in view of its significance. In the last 15 years I have visited Auschwitz and Birkenau several times and have studied the dark German history intensively. It is important to keep the memory alive in order to pass on the lessons to future generations. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to look at, but that's why we should look at it Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – A disturbing, but important photograph. —Bruce1eetalk 13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above... ... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Coffre peint, Alger, 19ème siècle - 02.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 11:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great, interesting motif but IMO too noisy (EXIF data indicates ISO 5000, would explain why) and I don't like the fact that it seems to have been pasted onto a plain white background, I'd prefer a more natural or gradient background Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I assume these settings were used as the museum didn't allow a tripod? Anyway, as Cmao20 says the result is too noisy for FP. Some of the white parts of the design also seem blown out and have no detail left. BigDom (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 02:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is IMO spoiled a bit by the line of bottles along the bottom Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote. The partially cut bottles enhance the cultural context, as cachaça is typically consumed at Brazilian barbecues, adding depth to the narrative without distracting from the main focus. I initially considered removing them, but a store employee told me not to, so I chose to respect their placement to reflect the authentic supermarket environment Wilfredor (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the feedback --Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info [Valadier] (Giuseppe) was a neoclassicist architect and designer and urban planner in Italy. Looking at the list of his works, there is not a work by Valadier that is not simply gorgeous. This is the Cathedral of Urbino's dome (1789-1810). Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could find some minor mistakes, but if this could be some MB less would be even better - hard to open. --Mile (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Minor issues fixed (e.g. stitching errors) and 10% file size reduction. Thanks for your remarks. Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Would reframing this to avoid the flag/banner help? I see that the exposure is a bit high (highlights on helmet), but not to the point that I'd oppose. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment How about this composition? --Laitche (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per above crop. Would support. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
NeutralI'd support a version that crops out that corner of the banner, because apart from that I think this is a good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, great. Cmao20 (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You're right, I cropped as per Mile proposal and reduce highlight on helmet to recover some details. --Shougissime (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Much better. Thank you. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lucky to get this path of cycler, angle was not so changed, otherwise i would never catch them bellow 1/800. If they would go more tangent even faster than that. --Mile (talk) 17:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the cropped version. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Thailand
- Info High resolution, sharp photo of interesting place with beautiful light + colours. No FPs of this place, and this is the only QI. created by BigDom - uploaded by BigDom - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Good but some edit could be done, anoted.--Mile (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mile You have a keen eye. I'm going to say the spots/streaks were insects, there were quite a few down there by the river. I have removed the ones you noted plus a couple more that the spot visualiser highlighted. Thanks, BigDom (talk) 10:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nomination! BigDom (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good. --Mile (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg (delist), not delisted
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Delist and replace--Zzzs (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per below. I now believe historical photos are superior to edited versions because they're, well, the original copy. --Zzzs (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, I like the colors of the existing file, but the others’ comments are too numerous not to be convincing. - Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With a picture like 'Earthrise' that has gained so much of its value from its iconic status, it is IMO appropriate to feature the version of it that is most similar to the 'famous' version, as opposed to a version that may be of higher technical quality. The proposed replacement is clearly a better quality image but if we want to feature a good quality photo of the Earth above the lunar surface, we shouldn't feature this image at all because it has long been superseded by photos from new space probes. Its value comes from its historical and cultural importance, not its technical quality. The iconic version of the picture, the one used by most sources including NASA themselves, is the current FP, and so that is the one we should feature. See also 1, 2, 3. 16:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Cmao20 (talk)
- Keep I agree with Cmao20. --FreCha (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The two pictures are two different things, even though they reproduce the same data. The older one has an historical value. It has been reproduced as such on newspapers, books, stamps, etc.: en:Earthrise. The newer one shows a more realistic version of the other, as "it had must be" if all colours would had been well balanced. There is a lot of technical job behind, and it has also a very important value, but mainly in the comparison with the other one. According to me, the newer one deserves to be enlisted among the featured picture, but not in substitution of the other one. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, Historical! --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results: Result: 5 delist, 5 keep, 1 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
File:National Theatre of Szeged.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice shot and looks like best available photo of this theater so far, but still I miss some more wow for an FP. --A.Savin 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Delias agostina (Hewitson,1852) - Yellow Jezebel.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 11:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and beautiful butterfly Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unlike what we're used to seeing, I would have preferred a lower-angle shot (worm's-eye view), but you can't have everything in life. The reflection and the contrast between the delicate elements and the mud make this photo worthy of being a Featured Photo. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)