Wikimedia Commons

User talk:NobbiP/Archive 1

< User talk:NobbiP
Latest comment: 10 years ago by JuTa in topic Notification about possible deletion
Learn more about this page


Image:Turkey_1500_LIRA_1981_back.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Turkey_1500_LIRA_1981_back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

NobbiP 18:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Premature QI stamp edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi NoppiP, I noticed here, that you added the QI stamp to a photo, which I had just promoted. Please note that according to the rules you have to wait 48 hours after promotion. The reason is that other reviewers may disagree with my review, and they should be allowed some time to consider the review. I have undone the QI edit, just so that you know. -- Slaunger 22:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, you are right, I read these guidelines for QI just this second and would take this away. Again, sorry. NobbiP talk 22:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
No problem. I had the impression that it was not intentional from your side. Just carry on the good work. -- Slaunger 23:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dasylirion wheeleri97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Congratz! (that was your first QI, wasn't it?) -- Slaunger 12:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your wishes, and special for YOUR promo. Yes, it was. Let me work on the next and the next and may be someone on one FP ? *smile* NobbiP talk 14:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I like the attitude ;-) -- Slaunger 14:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image:Gandhi_5_Rupees.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Gandhi_5_Rupees.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Samuell 02:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Britannia 18 back.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Britannia 18 back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC) I think I owe you an explanation as I tagged this for speedy. UK coins are subject to Crown copyright and do not become free until 50 years after their issue, since this coin is from 1994 it does not become free until 2044, the copyright of the subject of the photo resides with the Royal Mint despite the fact that you own the coin and that you took the photograph. In the past such discussion for deletion of British Coins have ususally gone very quickly towards deleting such images. Have a look at Category:Coins of the United Kingdom were there is a warning against loading images post 1958 and that this warning has been honoured.KTo288 22:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)KTo288 07:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cylindropuntia17.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You certainly have a lot of really nice pictures of plants and animals. This one, however, appears to be misidentified to species. The correct species is Cylindropuntia fulgida.
Mike

Thanks for your information, I will correct that. NobbiP 06:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:DynaCorp logo.svg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Pay attention to copyright Image:DynaCorp logo.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

AVRS 18:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:SANDLINE logo.svg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:SANDLINE logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 03:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Luxembourg 20 Euro, made of silver and titan, reverse edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey thanks for uploading a better quality version of this coin. Are you a collector?Kevin hipwell (talk) 07:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

eeh, yes - and no ;-) sometimes, when I see specialities or something special about coins, I take a look at the price. If it seems to be a fair one, maybe. So there are no complete countries years or so. One the other hand I collected in my teens so I have some old stuff, and 3rd I spend some money as alternative to the bank in nice but cheap gold (bullion coins). You can tak a look at my money gallery which representets may be 2-5% of my collection [1]. Hope this titan coin will not be deleted... doesn't remember the cpr of Lux here, else we can upload again at WP:en with fair use. Greetings NobbiP 16:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wow you have coins from all over the world (and a lot of Gold lol).
I've just been collecting Euro coins, are you gonna be getting the Austrian Niobium €25 coins?
Only the newest 2008 one, but it's on WP:en already here and here 01:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Deutsche_Bundespost_-_Posthorn_-_25_Pfennig.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Deutsche_Bundespost_-_Posthorn_-_25_Pfennig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

NobbiP 08:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Schumann-Marke edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo NobbiP,

habe dort noch mein Halbwissen auf der Diskussionsseite hinterlassen. Vielleicht kannst du klären, ob eine korrigierte Marke erschienen ist, und welche hier gezeigt wird. --Timo Beil (talk) 01:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Timo, ja, das stimmt, aber eben auch nur Teilweise, der Fehler ist nicht der Deutschen Bundespost, sondern der Post der DDR unterlaufen. Und wie du auf den nebenstehenden Scans sehen kannst, wurde er auch korrigiert. Habe es auch dort vermerkt. Grüßle NobbiP 18:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Altes Museum - Antikensammlung 018 b.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ich danke dir! :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Immer wieder gerne, Grüßle NobbiP 13:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stamps with unidentified topic edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bot search category like Category:Persons on stamps, Category:Aircrafts on stamps and other subcategories from Category:Stamps by topic. If this categorise not found - he add image to Category:Stamps with unidentified topic --Butko (talk) 09:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Nobby, ich fürchte, ein Experte wird nochmal ausrücken müssen. In Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Curd Juergens 2.jpg will es jemand noch genauer wissen - obwohl das ziemlich logisch erscheint. Gruss Mutter Erde (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Mutter Erde, hab da mal was zu geschrieben - bin aber alles andere als Jurist oder ähnlich. Hab nur bisschen gegoogelt und 2 Auszüge beigestellt. Schönen Sonntag NobbiP 13:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Das hast Du seeeehr gut gemacht. Ich danke Dir und grüsse aus Berlin Mutter Erde (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please link images edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello NobbiP/Archive 1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ups,.... edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

...bei [2] und [3] ist dir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen? Die Marken stammen von Aretz, daher hab ich die Kat wieder eingefügt. Viele Grüße ChristianBier (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hab gesehen, dass du das noch bei einigen Marken mehr gemacht hast. Fügst die Kat selbst wieder ein? ChristianBier (talk) 03:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Guten Morgen Christian, sorry, nein, war gestern erst zu voreilig und hab bei der Hälfte der Frauen den Aretz reingepackt, dann habe ich mir überlegt, dass ja alle Frauen und damit die ganze cat:Frauen als subcat besser zuzm Aretz passt. Gedacht, getan, und den Aretz bei den Frauen wieder raus, von wegen overcat und so. Falsch gedacht? Gib mir eine A. Grüßle NobbiP 09:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Vielleicht sollten wir statt die Marken in die jeweiligen Personenkats statt dessen in eine Cat "Stamps by XYZ" einsortieren. Dann in eine Orberkat "Stamps by Designer" und das dann als direkte Unterkat bei "Stamps". Ähnlich habe ich das System bei Wappen etabliert, siehe Category:Coats of arms by painter. ChristianBier (talk) 15:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
feel free, it's a wiki ;) NobbiP 19:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I have been enjoying your uploads of German stamps.I have my own collection but never obtained my favourites-the Wagner set of 1933 Do you have these stamps and if so would you scan them sometime? Many thanks for whats done so far and best wishes from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks back to you for honoring my scans. But I'm very sorry, I don't have these stamps available and I think it would be to expensive for me to catch them. I've mainly after the 2nd WW and only a few before (the cheapest German Empire and old states). Most of these I've already upload - but be carefull I have been cheated with some of my old Hannover stamps (now I've marked them) - might be the one or the other too? - Greetings to Ireland NobbiP 21:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

That is sad.Yes they are very expensive. I will see if someone will help by writing to a stamp magazine.All old stamps are a real problem unless it is a family collection and you can be really sure.Mine is mostly DDR but no early issues from there either.

In de:Briefmarken-Jahrgang 1969 der Deutschen Post der DDR is an ongoing Projekt side by side of "Berlin" (finished) and "BRD" (finshed 1949..1969 and some more) who will have all the stamps in articles separated by year, take a look. But it will may be take a loooooooooong time for scan about 3000 pcs of DDR and also still up to 2500 for BRD. (We must be very crazy boys) - Have a good night NobbiP 22:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step - Chairman Mao Tse Tung. Nice 1949 DDR I don't have these early ones. Best regards Robert akaNotafly (talk) 21:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You and Mao are right, but I can do only the first "four" steps. I've got only 1949 of them. Greetings NobbiP 21:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Maple Leaf 01 front.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Maple Leaf 01 front.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

|EPO| da: 19:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

1933 Wagner stamps edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

These cannnot be in copyright so I uploaded web images. Lets see what happens. I was at Lorlei Rhine 4 weeks ago also in Frankfurt Guetersloh etc. Happye Easter Robert Notafly (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Notafly, happy easter for you as well. Of course these stamps are not copyright protected, did you mean necause the notification one up? these meant a gold coin which was not ok. Thanks for upload of these Wagner set, do you allow me to enhanced them a bit? I mean correct the horizontaly direction, cropp as far as needed, and try to remove the pocket strip a bit? Secondly I would to suggest to rename the one with the doubled "Tannhäuser" to the "Fliegender Holländer" - I can do that as trusted "renamer" if it's ok for you. Greets NobbiP 16:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, of course.I did very little here,because stamps are only a hobby for me. I had, for instance just uploaded a hundred or so butterfly images from Museum Wiesbaden taken during an entomological (Insekten)trip to Germany in March which was when I went to the Middle Rhine valley. I may upload a few other of my Briefmarken favourites soon. Thanks for your kind offer.It is very much appreciated.Very best wishes from rainy Ireland Robert Notafly (talk) 08:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Scanner edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Great news.I have some stamps (old Germany) that I must look out and send (originals) + some interesting early North Vietnam ex a freind in DDR.They may take time to find.Let me know if you are interested.My e-mail is on the website given on my main wiki talk page.Thanks for your effort.Best regards from Ireland.Robert Notafly (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

doesn't know exactly what you mean, you wan't to send origin stamps to me for scan? or scans to enhance? Let's first look which you have, I've some in my stockbock, so if they are the same it doesn't make sense. You have a Michel catalogue for the numbers? or can you describe the stamps you have? And yes I'm interested in old German but sorry, not in stamps of Vietnam (may be copyright protected anyway). Good Night NobbiP 21:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will send original stamps for your scanner. First examples are Saargebiet 1920 overprint issue 3 mint 5, 10 and 60 with overprint shift: ATM stamp with missing black value imprint. DDR 2 coil stamps accidentally printed in sheets; all later DDR mostly mint and many miniature sheets DDR SG EEO207 unmounted sheet of ten: West Berlin 1960-1985 complete set of mint.It may take some time to list all but I will make a start.Cheers RobertNotafly (talk) 10:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Germania definitive set Michel 140-153; Bavaria Essay for 1920 definitive series.The others I will photograph and send as attachments.Then you can choose. By E-mail is best but I could upload to Commons. Cheers again RobertReply

Hi notafly, Saargebiet is fine, DDR mint or similar is not nessesary, because Nightflyer is on work of the complete DDR since 1955 until 1990, and as far as I know all miniature sheets are done. West Berlin is also done and on commons completely. Germania 140-153 mint I've complete except the 151 11/4. Bavaria 1920 (?) 177 and 178 to 195 ? I own these stamps as well. So I could help and scan / upload tons of stamps, but it cost a lot of time not only to scan but for make it ready to upload. I think about 15 to 30 min for every and each stamp - an sometime I've to work as well ;-) Further I commit to expand the West-Germany set from actually 1972 (1949 to 1971 are done) to now and want to do for my self to create the stamps of German Reich beginning with 1944 / 45 backwards (I've these except 2 of them complete on my PC ready for upload). I'll email you my address if you still interested and willing to wait. Have a nice day NobbiP 12:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wagner Stamps edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bravo.Many many thanks. I am still sorting my German stamps. Slow process but I will post some next week.atb Robert aka Notafly (talk) 19:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Neubenennung edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo NobbiP, könntest du als "trusted user" dann mal die Verschiebung von File:Lacerta agilis zelenci c.JPG auf den neuen Dateinamen veranlassen? Die Eidechse war definitiv falsch bestimmt (siehe dortige Disk.seite). -- Danke und Gruß, Fice (talk) 07:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Die Umbenennung habe ich durch meinen "last edit" doch bereits bestätigt (!???) - Wenn der bot am Image vorbeikommt, wird er die Umbenennung vornehmen. Warum das zur Zeit wieder länger dauert, weiss ich allerdings nicht, habe bereits vor über 2 Wo ein anderes Image getagged und das ist immer noch nicht umbenammst. Ein explizites "Move" kann ich leider nicht, das können nur Admins auf Commons, hoffentlich wird dieses Feature bald mal freigegeben. Grüßle NobbiP 16:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ah ja. Na mal schau'n, was passieren wird. -- Gruß, Fice (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:DR 1941 787 Adolf Hitler 2.jpg -> Ostland 1941 7 Adolf Hitler.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Die Marke wurde bereits umbenannt, dabei sind mir in der ru wikipedia noch folgende Bilder aufgefallen die nicht der Benennung der anderen Briefmarken des dt. Reichs übereinstimmen. Kannst du mal schauen, ob ein {{Rename}} angebracht ist? Da Umbennen jetzt einfacher ist wäre es kein Problem.

Grüße, --Martin H. (talk) 12:28, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Martin, nun ja, z.B. "Stamp Ukraine" sagt ja nicht viel aus, andererseits, ist die darin enthaltene Aussage weder falsch oder irreführend noch sind die Info-Lücken kritisch. Der Namensschlüssel "DR 19xx MiNr Thema" stammt aus meiner Feder, da die hergebrachten allgemeinen Bezeichnungen mit "Stamps of Country (Location) 19xx, MiNr nnn.jpg" mir zu lang erschienen und auch keinen Hinweis auf Thema/Darstellung etc. enthalten. Aber einen Konsens wirds da wohl nicht geben. Wichtiger als den Namen finde ich ist die Zuordnung in die entsprechenden Kategorien: Stamp of "Country" (optional year) and/or stamp of year, xxx on stamps usw. damit die MArken bei Bedarf gefunden werden können. - Aber bitte, versteh mich nicht falsch, ich möchte mich natürlich nicht gegen eine Namensänderung sperren o.ä., wenn dies gewünscht ist (vom uploader ?) warum nicht. Habe mal meine Ideen dazugeschrieben, wenn umbenamst werden sollte, denn ich denke die in der Überschrift zugeordnete ist mMn falsch seitens der Identifizierung. Liebe Grüße NobbiP 13:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ich bin leider kein Briefmarkenexperte, wollte das nur mal weitergeben. Meine Meinung dazu ist, dass durch das Rename per "pagemove" kein Uploader sich gestört fühlen darf da seine edits nicht, wie beim vorherigen Reupload per Bot, verschwinden sondern erhalten bleiben und der Scan auch weiter in seiner persönlichen Gallery auftaucht. Genau wie Artikel umbenannt werden gibt es auch bei Bildern keine Besitzansprüche wenn sie auf Commons liegen. Ich sehe für deutsche Marken Category:Stamps of Germany als führende Kategorie und würde die MiNr-Benennung als anerkanntes Namensschema bezeichnen (Commons:File renaming). Zwar stammt die Nummer aus einem unfreien Hintergrund, ist aber doch in D absolut etabliert. Naja, ich wollte dich nur auf das Chaos aufmerksam machen. --Martin H. (talk) 14:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for your nice explanation, that was very kind of you. I just think most people won't understand all those codes, so simplifying the names a bit would help. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Definitive stamps of Germany edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, was bedeutet Category:Definitive stamps of Germany? Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 00:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dauermarken ;) die "deutschen" sind aber wohl nicht gepflegt... Gruß NobbiP 11:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ich habe es mir schon gedacht. Dann sollte man sie aber eigentlich löschen, denn wir haben ja die Category:Deutsche Briefmarkenserie, die im Plural natürlich besser wäre. Auch in anderen Ländern werden die Definitive-Kategorien (Category:Definitive stamps) offensichtlich kaum gepflegt. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:SBZ Thüringen 1945 Bl 1 Für die Opfer des Faschismus.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, ich glaube nicht, dass es sich dabei um ein Miniature sheet handelt. Ich meine, das sind nur Stamps on stamps. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 00:31, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ich glaube schon, die 3 Einzelmarken hatten Originalgröße waren auch separat nach Zerschneiden frankaturgültig. Lediglich war der Block gegenüber den Einzelmarken überteuert (2,- M vs. 12 Pf. Frankatur) und hatte eine Perforation. Wo soll auch bei der großen "Stamps on Stamps" der Frankaturwert angegeben gewesen sein? Naja, immerhin gebe ich zu, dass es wohl nicht allzuviele einzele Marken aus dem Block gab, die für Frankaturen verwendet wurden. Grüßle NobbiP 00:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
OK, ist ja auch nicht so wichtig. Du bist wahrscheinlich sowieso der besser informierte Philatelist. Ich habe nich schon längere Zeit nicht mehr um meine Sammlung gekümmert. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 11:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pardon! edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, entschuldige bitte meine Fehler, ich hatte mich wohl schon auf einen anderen Vorgang konzentriert. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

No Problem, kann im Eifer des Gefechs immer passieren ;-) Gruß NobbiP 23:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

tamaño de los sellos edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Estoy construyendo un Album de Alemania. En este momento estoy en Berlin Occidental, he encontrado su pagina y me ha sido de gran ayuda. Pero necesito saber el tamaño real de los sellos. en milimetros. Me puede ayudar. Gracias Mi email es Julpemu1983@hotmail.com

Babel user information
es-0 Esta persona no tiene ningún conocimiento del español (o lo entiende con mucha dificultad).
Users by language
do you want to see the dimensions of stamps in mm? cant say that in detail. But, all stamps uploaded of myself and also of user:Nightflyer are scanned in 1200 dpi - reworked - and scaled down to 50%, means they should scaled to 600 dpi. (Exceptions are only some miniature sheets which are scaled down to 25%.) So you are able to measure the size in pixels and calc to the size in mm by your self. Hope that helps and you are able to read and understand my English. NobbiP 16:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File mover edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

The functionality of the template {{Rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah nice to see someone working on the file moves :-) But there is no need to sign [4] since the bot do not care and it only leaves more work to cleanup :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I actually put the signature in the template, so that i can easily make sure that all requests are from legit filemovers, when I move the commands to the main page--DieBuche (talk) 21:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks MGA73 for your note and also DieBuche for make it clear ... or not clear? I'll use my sign again next time ;-) A good night. NobbiP 21:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Well now that it is all clear: Enjoy! :-D Well problem is that there is no documentation telling what template should do and/or not do. File movers should be allowed to add commands directly and not post on the talk page but that is not an option right now so I think it is ok to add a signature now that DieBuche told me the reason for signing. When I add the command I use the quick-adding link and there I get no signature (at least not when I used it last time). --MGA73 (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Here's the reason for that: The template contains two divs, one with the id "nuke" & one with the id "filemover". Admins only get to see the nuke part, containing no signature. Filemovers only get to see their part with a link to the talk page & a sig. The rest of the users doesn't see anything after the sentence "This request will be dealt with by an administrator or filemover" --DieBuche (talk) 12:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Magnolia files renamed edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Thanks for renaming the Magnolia files I tagged for renaming so soon and conform my suggestions. - Wikiklaas (talk) 22:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I do my best. But rename this: File:Yulan 2.JPG to this: File:Mulan 2.JPG could not be serious, could it? NobbiP 20:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for taking notice and being so thorough. But the renaming of Yulan 2.JPG into Mulan 2.jpg was indeed a serious request. Maybe you would have to know a bit about Magnolia names to appreciate this. "Mulan" is the Chinese name for Magnolia liliiflora; "Yulan" is the Chinese name for Magnolia denudata. These are two quite different species. Magnolia experts will expect a quite different species in a file called "Yulan" than they would expect in a file called "Mulan". This is exactly what is wrong with the naming of the file "Yulan 2.JPG", which in fact depicts a "Mulan". So yes: I am absolutely honestly and utterly serious when I make a request for renaming that file. I know my bit on Magnolia names. I would never make jokes about this subject and also would never try to mislead people when I make requests which other users will have to fulfill, nor would I ask for unnecessary or unimportant changes. I am a serious contributor to wikipedia and I have no other aims than to improve it. - Wikiklaas (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Done this one - MPF (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to both of you to make it clear and already rename this pic. For me "Mulan 2" is the name of a movie from the Disney Studios only. So even if you are right, I'd suggest to rename to "Magnolia liliiflora xxx" may be xxx as number or even then as Mulan. Anyway, similar to MBF: "Done (th)is (d)one". NobbiP 16:33, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your comment - responded on my page edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ingolfson (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Echiura/Sipuncula. edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, thank you very much for letting me know. The correct file is now at File:Sipuncula (unidentified).jpg. Delinker will have to do a replace now and the redirect deleted. Could you proceed with that? Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 10:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:UK traffic sign 670V30.svg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi NobbiP,

I noticed you renamed the above file "per naming convention". Would you provide me with a link or details on the convention? -- User:Docu at 07:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doku, the "per naming convention" was a request by user:Svgalbertian (see also history of the file), I did the rename because of the many other road signs in the Category:Diagrams of road signs of the United Kingdom have this filename format. It I went wrong, so please tell me why. NobbiP talk 08:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Unless you can establish such a convention, there isn't really a reason to rename the file. Personally, I think "speedy limit sign" is better than just "traffic sign". -- User:Docu at 07:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 04:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Malta 2 Pound 1981 back.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Malta 2 Pound 1981 back.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of images of Indian money edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Several images of Indian money have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you uploaded one or more of the images that is now up for deletion. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of India. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Luxemburg 20 Euro Titan 2006 back 79.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Luxemburg 20 Euro Titan 2006 back 79.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hammersoft (talk) 13:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Luxemburg 20 Euro Titan 2006 front 59.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Luxemburg 20 Euro Titan 2006 front 59.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hammersoft (talk) 13:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Danke für die Korrektur edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Das mit den Kategorien irgendwas nicht koscher ist, hatte ich bemerkt, aber nicht konsequent alle Dateien kontrolliert. Nach etwas suchen fand ich den Bug, den scheint man aber nicht allzu ernst zu nehmen. Ich bleib bei der manuellen Version oder commonist, wollte das Ding aber mal testen. Eine modifizierte Version soll wohl bei Wikilovesmonuments bereitgestellt werden... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

;-) gerne doch NobbiP talk 19:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

CCCP and russian palladium coins edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Little problem for your proposition in VI, can you go to see? Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Universally replaced edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please see File talk:Sipuncula.jpg#Universally replaced and respond there, if you wish (you seemed to be involved in some way). - dcljr (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Beschreibung von Briefmarken edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo NobbiP! Habe in der Sammlung meines Opas gestöbert und möchte einige Funde daraus einstellen. Könntest Du mal nen Blick darauf werfen und mir helfen, diese korrekt zu beschreiben? Sind es Notmarken?

Dabei geht es mir auch um das Template: Gehören diese Marken als Marken einer Besatzungszone gekennzeichnet? Wenn erwünscht, könnte ich noch Bilder einstellen, auf denen die Briefmarken allein abgebildet sind. Schönen Sonntag! --ChristianSW (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Christian, nach Kriegsende 1945 wurden in allen deutschen Gebieten unterschiedlichste Notbehelfe auf lokaler Ebene zur Freimachung von Briefen verwendet. Alte Reichsbriefmarken, auch mit Abbild des Gröfatz, mit entsprechendem schwarzem oder farbigen Stempel in versch. Mustern, oder nur eigene Stempel auf Karte/Brief oder eben eigene "Lokalausgaben" wie hier in Großräschen. Ich würde an deiner Stelle, nachdem du bereits eine englische Beschreibung eingefügt hast diese 2 sprachig machen mit {{en|...}} und {{de|...}}. In meinem M-Spezial von '04 werden die 3 Lokalausgaben als "Gebührenmarken" deklariert, d.h. Postgebühr oder einfach auch wie "Briefmarke". Im einzelnen, die erste vom 25 Sept, hier sollte auch ein "Schlägel und Eisen" drauf sein, aber von einem einfachen Handstempel, der Kurzschriftstempel "Schriftwechsel in deutscher Kurzschrift erwünscht" ist aber vorhanden, ebenso der vom 20.7.-16.10.45 verwendete Entwertungsstempel "P A \ Großräschen \ Geb.Bez" er sieht auch genau so aus wie im Katalog. 2. Hier dürfte es sich um eine 19 A III vom Rand (1 Seite vom Rand ungezähnt) handeln (auf Brief 13 Michel-Euro), allerdings fehlt hier und auch auf der 3ten der Kurzschriftstempel, hmmm. 3. das Paar sollte die 16 A sein, links Typ I, rechts Typ II. (Einzeln auf Brief 3,- bzw. 5,- Michel-€), der Kreis-Gitter-Stempel sollte lt. Katalog ab dem 13. Nov. 45 wieder im Einsatz gewesen sein. - Letzterer ist auch in der stampsX Datenbank mehrfach vorhanden z.T. auf Marken der gleichen Serien Gruß zum Sonntag, NobbiP talk 14:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
P.S. darf ich deinen Stempel des ersten Briefs ausschneiden und auf stampsX hochladen? Oder möchtest du dies ggf. selbst tun? Gruß, NobbiP talk 14:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Herzlichen Dank für Deine kundige und ausführliche Antwort. Du darfst die Bilder gerne für eigene Zwecke weiterverwenden. Hilft es Dir, wenn ich den Bildausschnitt mit dem Stempel von der Scandatei hochlade? --ChristianSW (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hallo Christian, danke für dein feedback. Nein, extra hochladen musst du da nichts, ich kann den Stempelabschlag einfach ausschneiden, das reicht. NobbiP talk 14:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hallo! Habe begonnen, Deine Angaben für die Beschreibungen zu übernehmen. Bei der ersten Marke sind "Schlägel und Eisen" noch schwach zu erkennen, ich tippe auf MiNr 7. Gruß --ChristianSW (talk) 06:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Postkarte "Erster Flug Hamburg-London" 1948 edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Guten Morgen! In der kommenden Zeit werde ich noch nach und nach Bilder rund um das Thema Briefmarken einstellen, sofern sie relevant für Wikimedia Commons zu sein scheinen. Wenn Du magst, melde ich mich mit Funden bei Dir, die Du dann gerne für Dich übernehmen kannst.

Viele Grüße --ChristianSW (talk) 06:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Saarland / Dienstmarken edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo NobbiP, ich konnte der Versuchung nicht widerstehen und habe Deine schönen Marken mal in einem Album nach meinem Geschmack angeordnet. Nun eine Frage: ich habe die Dienstmarken von 1949 nicht gefunden, gibts die irgendwo? Viele Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 13:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hallo A. Wagner, deine Saarland-Seite gefällt ;-) Die Dienstmarken dazu habe ich leider auch nicht vollständig, sollten sich mit etwas Geduld im Internet finden lassen, z.B. als Picture-Copy (sind mMn PD) Gruß, NobbiP 17:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Danke für die Blumen ;-) Ich kann gar nicht mehr damit aufhören, die Marken in Alben zu ordnen, da schlägt voll die Sucht durch. Früher war ich mal aktiver Philatelist, dann hat sich der Fokus auf andere Sachen verlagert, wies halt so ist. Aber, wie ich schon Nightflyer schrieb, „Wer einmal klebt, der klebt, solang er lebt“ dieses alte Philatelisten-Sprichwort scheint wohl zu stimmen. Wegen den Dienstmarken halten wir den Ball flach, es gibt ja genug andres schönes Material hier, und das bleibt auch hoffentlich noch lange so. Viele Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:DBP 1994 1718 Sporthilfe Fußball FIFA-WM-Pokal.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DBP 1994 1718 Sporthilfe Fußball FIFA-WM-Pokal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.173.236 11:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Commons: Michel-catalog edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, it's me again. I added missing stamps to the Michel-catalog till Nrs 1500 today. I'm not quite sure about how to handle valid stamps, but here ist what I found on German wiki today:

stamps]

PS: I'm at the moment also working on List of butterflies and moths in Germany where I integrated stamps from butterflies/moths if there is not photo avaiable... --Dudy001 (talk) 11:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:James Rizzi Grüße EUROPA.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:James Rizzi Grüße EUROPA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Correlatio (talk) 22:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Post Alles Gute stamp 2008.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Post Alles Gute stamp 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Correlatio (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:James Rizzi Danke.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:James Rizzi Danke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Correlatio (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Post Herzlichen Glückwunsch.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Post Herzlichen Glückwunsch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Correlatio (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:DSCN3568.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:DSCN3568.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 19:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

why you called me? It's not my upload. Don't know this picture. NobbiP 19:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Briefmarke Stiefel bei Sankt Ingbert edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo NobbiP,

Wir würden gerne deinen Scan der Briefmarke Stiefel bei Sankt Ingbert in einem Sagenbuch veröffentlichen. Ist das mit Nennung mit NobbiP als "Autor" möglich?

Mit herzlichen grüßen

HVV Kirkel

P.s. Verzeih aber ich bin noch ganz neu in Wikipedia und hoffe das ich auf die richtige Art und Weise mit dir Kontakt aufgenommen habe.

Hallo HVV Kirkel, danke für die Anfrage. Zunächst, es ist keine Entschuldigung o.ä. nötig, es war alles ziemlich richtig. Lediglich allgemeine kleine Hinweise seien mir erlaubt: Auf Diskussieonsseiten (wie diese) fügt man i.A. immer unten an, zum Abschluß "unterschreibt" man mit 4 Tilden "~~~~" wie ich im Anschluß, da werden dann die Tilden mit dem Namen oder der IP-Adresse + Datum + Uhrzeit ersetzt.
Nun zu deiner Frage, natürlich, gerne kannst du das Bild der Briefmarke verwenden. mMn ist dies auch unabhängig von mir möglich, denn die Briefmarke ist nach meinem dafürhalten "Public Domain", einige mögen das anders sehen daher keine Garantie. p.s. später mal ein Link auf das Buch wäre nett. Viele Grüße, {4 Tilden ->} NobbiP 11:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Saar 1947 223 ehemalige Benediktiner Abtei Mettlach, Alter Turm.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Saar 1947 223 ehemalige Benediktiner Abtei Mettlach, Alter Turm.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

About stamps images licence edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello NobbiP! Under which conditions is it possible to use your images of German stamps to illustrate a new stamp exchange site (Same site than http://www.timbres-benelux.be/ or http://www.philateliefree.fr/ ). Thank's --Lchabot (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Lchabot, for my personal understanding, alle German stamps at least up to 1995 are in public domain. Some people, also here in WP thinks this isn't correct and have already deleted some of them. Anyway from my site feel free to use any stamp I've ever uploaded here - but the minimal last bit of risc is on your own. I of course would like to see a remark anywhere on your site that the scans are from wikmedia and a link to it, not for each scan but for these hole thing. Like "Many (or most) Scans of the German stamps are from [wikimedia commons]" Have fun with your next project. NobbiP 17:24, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello NobbiP, thank you so much for your quick answer. I am delighted to be able to use your scans, I would put a link to your Wikimedia page to indicate the images origin. The site will be online in a few months, I will post a new message on your page when online. Thank's a lot. --Lchabot (talk) 11:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:DR 1938 664 Adolf Hitler.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DR 1938 664 Adolf Hitler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 10:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Editor @ ar.wiki edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:DBP - 100 Jahre Friedrich Ebert - 30 Pfennig - 1971.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DBP - 100 Jahre Friedrich Ebert - 30 Pfennig - 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 22:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 12:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 12:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 12:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 12:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NobbiP/Archive_1&oldid=303434737"
Return to the user page of "NobbiP/Archive 1".