User talk:PMRMaeyaert/Archive

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Bedankt voor je voortreffelijke bijdragen ...

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Maar het zou wel even goed zijn om na te zien hoe de categories hier gemaakt zijn. Het is geen tagging systeem en categorie namen zijn meestal in het Engels. Misschien even kijken hoe je eerste bijdragen nu gecategoriseerd zijn en deze (Click history). Beste groet. --Foroa (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Zeg Paul, ik ben geimpressioneerd door je duidelijk professioneel werk. Ik heb in de jaren 1979/1980 nog je zwart-wit bewonderd met onder andere Minox cameras als ik me goed herinner. Die categories aanpassen is vrij veel werk, vooral omdat ze van in het begin zeer summier kunnen zijn, zoals bijvoorbeeld Category:Buildings in Oudenaarde. Om je tijd te geven om het eens na te kijken blokkeer ik je vooor een half uurtje. Beste groet. --Foroa (talk) 16:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Gent, Sint-Baafskathedraal De Kesel B STB 598.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Gent, Sint-Baafskathedraal De Kesel B STB 598.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 17:09, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Lamgods closed.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lamgods closed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 17:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:PM 024032 B Ronse.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi PMRMaeyaert, just to understand it corectly, this image shows a mural in Belgium, right? Who is the author/artist of this mural? --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

hint for the description

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi PMRMaeyaert, can you please use another delimiter than '|' (pipe) for your description as e.g. in File:PM 039656 B Oudenaarde.jpg, as pipe is a special character in wiki context and cuts the description (in your case) to the very last part after the last pipe symbol. This makes the important part of the description, the name of the object disappear and reduces information just to the last part, which usually is the country. I already changed a lot of your descriptions by just replacing '|' (pipe) by '/' (slash). It makes categorizationn a lot easier if the description is readable and you do not have to dig into the source code to read it. Btw, compliments to your vast collection of valuable and high-quality images. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

moved to here from :de:User talk:Herzi Pinki: Beste Dank für das Bericht und Info. Für mich ist es einfach | (wird gebraucht bei Adobe Bridge "keywords") es umzuwandeln in "backslash" \. Leider sind jetzt die Bilder augeladen, es zu änderen wäre eine sehr grosse Arbeit ... Das auflader der Bilder kostet mir sehr viel Zeit. Seit etwa zwei/drei Jahre habe ich meine Bilder, au mein Bildarchiv, gut documentiert und jedes Bild ist jetzt correct lokalisiert (geo tagging). Das mehrerteil Kulturerbst (Cultural Heritage) ist auch in Europeana präsent. http://www.europeana.eu/portal/search?q=pmrmaeyaert Pol

Hallo Pol, danke für die Antwort. Ich habe das hierher verschoben, damit die Fragen und Antworten zusammenbleiben. Bitte antworte mir auch hier, ich schaue gelegentlich.

Ich hoffe ich habe dir mit meinen Änderungen an den bereits hochgeladenen Dateien kein Problem gemacht. z.B. [1]. Und ich kann das weiter für die heute von dir hochgeladenen Dateien machen. Die Bitte war in die Zukunft gerichtet, ich weiß ja nicht, wie viele Bilder noch kommen.

Wenn geht, wäre mir / lieber als \, aber besser als | sind sie beide.

Die Geo-Daten kommen leider nicht hier auf Commons an. Eine Variante die funktioniert ist die Koordinaten über die Exif-Daten zu übergeben. Siehe z.B. File:Street_light_Waldmüllerpark_03.jpg.

Schön, dass die Bilder auch auf der Europeana präsent sind, die Lizenzen sind allerdings unterschiedlich.

(so eine Unterschrift bekommst du hier einfach mit den 4 Tilden ~~~~:) lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

File:PM 049517 F Douaumont.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049517 F Douaumont.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:PM 049519 F Douaumont.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049519 F Douaumont.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:PM 049524 F Douaumont.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049524 F Douaumont.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:PM 049526 F Douaumont.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049526 F Douaumont.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:PM 049528 F Douaumont.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049528 F Douaumont.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 049517 F Douaumont.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Ein Tipp

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Pol, die Seite ist zu groß geworden, wäre nett wenn du die alten Sachen löschen könntest. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Millau F PM 037779.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Millau F PM 037779.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

68.193.210.74 01:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Millau F PM 037802.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Millau F PM 037802.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

68.193.210.74 01:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Duplicaten

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, ik merk dat je de laatste tijd nogal wat foto's hebt opgeladen die je soms al jaren geleden op Commons hebt gezet, en doorgaans in een betere resolutie. Het is niet de bedoeling dat je Commons vervuilt met onnodige duplicaten van lagere kwaliteit. Je bent zeer productief geweest, waarvoor dank, maar nu wordt het echt onoverzichtelijk. Het gaat zo te zien om duizenden foto's. Het is ondoenlijk om dat allemaal manueel te controleren. Wat stel je voor? mvg Henxter (talk) 17:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Beste, Wat je zegt is juist: ik heb een hele reeks foto's opnieuw in Wiki gepubliceerd, echter met veel meer informatie via de metadata, wat belangrijk is, en wat nu ook veel efficiënter en sneller gaat. Ik publiceer de foto's voortaan in een formaat 600px, wat voldoende is voor evaluatie en schermgebruik. U moet weten dat ik de eerste reeksen heb gepubliceerd ruim drie jaar geleden. Sindsdien werden van heel wat foto's de bestandsnamen gewijzigd wat héél, héél spijtig is want aldus gaat alle connectie verloren met mijn beeldarchief dat intussen is aangegroeid tot ruim 40000 hoogkwalitatieve foto's, alles gedocumenteerd, gelokaliseerd. Dit betekent voor mij -professioneel fotograaf- een belangrijke investering. De nieuwe reeksen foto's bevatten heel wat meer informatie, die via de metadata automatisch verschijnen, en vervat zitten in de beeldbestanden, die men (gratis) kan opladen. Die eerste reeksen worden momenteel gebuikt als link naar Europeana (http://www.europeana.eu/portal/search?q=pmrmaeyaert) en ik hoop dat men niet nog een keer de bestandsnamen zal wijzigen, wat zinloos is, en waardoor de link verloren gaat. De opnieuw gepubliceerde foto's bevatten veel meer informatie, en men kan bezwarend van "vervuiling" spreken. Het ware heel nuttig mocht ik op een of andere wijze een lijst kunnen maken van al de foto's die ik in Wiki tot nog toe heb gepubliceerd. Met vriendelijke groeten, Paul M.R. Maeyaert La Rectoria de Sallent E-25286 Pinell de Solsona tel +34 669 783202 pmrmaeyaert@gmail.com www.pmrmaeyaert.eu — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 176.85.62.50 (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Beste Paul, ik zie dat er recent weer een reeks bestanden is bijgekomen. Ik heb inmiddels alles wat ik van je kon vinden in een specifieke (verborgen) categorie ondergebracht: Category:Photographs by User:PMRMaeyaert. Misschien dat je dat kan helpen - alhoewel, er zijn al 23.100 bestanden.

Sommige foto's zijn wel twee of drie keer opgeladen, dat is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling en tegen de policy van Commons.

Ik geef dit voorbeeld:

Brussel, Poelaertplein-PM 57596.jpg, 372 kB, opgeladen 11-11-2011
Brussel B PM 057596.jpg, 211 kB, opgeladen 30-3-2016
PM 057596 B Brussel.jpg, 211 kB, opgeladen 27-4-2016

Ik begrijp je standpunt over de bestandsnamen, maar ik weet niet welke vorm je verkiest als identifier en dus welk bestand er overbodig is. De laatste tijd lijken ze de vorm te hebben PM 000000 B xxxx.jpg. Is dat je voorkeur?

Dan is er het probleem dat je de foto al eens eerder hebt opgeladen in een hogere resolutie. Volgens de policy van Commons mag deze versie alleen overschieten, maar dat zou betekenen dat de bestandsnaam van je voorkeur, en de bijgewerkte metadata verloren gaan. Wat denk je? Henxter (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hallo, Zoals reeds gezegd is het fenomeen, de beelden die twee, drie keer voorkomen, mij bekend. Sinds enige tijd, en in de toekomst zal ik het steeds zo blijven doen, gebruik ik mijn originele bestandsnaam (PM_xxxxxx_X_plaatsnaam), die ook een landcode bevat. Het zijn de vroegere beelden die ik zo'n vier jaar geleden heb opgeladen die een probleem vormen. Ik kan nu gemakkelijk alle metadata onder "beschrijving/description" invoegen, wat het opladen heel wat snellen en efficiënter kan doen verlopen. Ik hou nu ook nauwkeuriger bij welke beelden in Wiki reeds aanwezig zijn. Via de beschrijving/description kan men nu alle gegevens gemakkelijk lezen; bij opladen zijn deze ook in de metadata nauwkeuriger geklasseerd (title, header, location, sublocation, province, country, copyright, zodat later de mogelijkheid tot locatie op kaarten (geotagging) mogelijk wordt. ook de transfert van trefwoorden (keywords) naar categoriën zou moeten mogelijk zijn. Ik kan proberen de dubbele bestanden te verwijderen, maar moet leren hoe dat best gebeurt. Met vriendelijke groeten, Pol

File:PM 048137 F Fontenay.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 048137 F Fontenay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 11:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Gent, sint-Baafskathedraal Van PeteghemB STB 605.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Gent, sint-Baafskathedraal Van PeteghemB STB 605.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Basvb (talk) 10:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Sint Maria Latem, de Onze Lieve Vrouwe Zeven Smartenkerk

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

kerk

Beste Paul, zou u iets voor mij kunnen nakijken? Onder de categorie "Sint-Mattheuskerk (Munkzwalm)" vond ik een aantal foto's van u (waaronder de rechtse). De foto's zijn echter van de Onze Lieve Vrouwe Zeven Smartenkerk in Sint Maria Latem. Er zijn ook een groot aantal interieurfoto's. Kunt u bevestigen dat de interieurfoto's bij dezelfde kerk horen? In dat geval dient de hele reeks naar de juiste categorie verplaatst te worden. Mvg DirkVE (talk) 08:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Beste,

Bedankt voor de opmerkzaamheid: er is blijkbaar een vergissing gebeurd! De foto's exterieur, interieur zijn van dezelfde kerk, dit is zowat zeker. Ik kan het echter moeilijk verifiëren, ik woon in Catalunya/Spanje ... en kan dit moeilijk verfiëren. Er zijn blijkbaar heel wat paginas over de kerk. Met vriendelijke groeten, Paul M.R. Maeyaert La Rectoria de Sallent E-25286 Pinell de Solsona tel +34 669 783202 pmrmaeyaert@gmail.com www.pmrmaeyaert.eu — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 176.85.207.59 (talk) 11:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Beste Paul, ik ben zelf gaan verder opzoeken en het blijken toch de interieurfoto's van de St-Mattheuskerk in Munkzwalm te zijn en de exterieurfoto's van de Onze Lieve Vrouwe Zeven Smartenkerk in Sint-Maria-Latem. Alles zit nu in de juiste categorieën. Mvg DirkVE (talk) 13:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	File:Houtaing B PM 013733.jpg: me ne hai fatto innamorare, complimenti! File:Houtaing B PM 013733.jpg:You made me fall in love with it, congratulations! --Pietro Di Fontana 13:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dusfort PM 081865 E.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dusfort PM 081865 E.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dusfort PM 081865 E.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lenka64 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

File:PM 011769 B.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 011769 B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dans (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

File:PM 002646 B Oudenaarde.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 002646 B Oudenaarde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mitte27 (talk) 02:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your files with Category:Pierres (Eure-et-Loir)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi ! I looked at your 3 files :

I think it is not the right categorization. Could you do something about it ? Sincerely, --Le Passant (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

You are surely not the author of Liebig cards

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

that are > 100 years old. Hence all your "copyrights" and "author fields" are simply bogus. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Madrid E PM 020679.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Thank you very much for your big work. Can you help me with this your file? Do you have it's bigger version, high res? Or maybe you know some secret site where I can find it? --Shakko (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Douaumont F PM 049517.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Verdun,Le Memorial de la Tranchée des Baïonettes-PM 49503.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

File rename

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@PMRMaeyaert: this file should be renamed because of #2. Since you were the uploader, do you have any suggestions? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 114589 B Ronse.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

File:PMa B 321 Brugge.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

@PMRMaeyaert: , Andries Van den Abeele maakte De Pape (kunstenaars in Brugge) aan en ik vroeg me af of te achterhalen is wie dit werkje maakte. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Wil je ondertussen ook even nazien of mijn categorization correct is?

Lotje (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Oudenaarde

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Zie File talk:PM NE 0073 07.jpg: Of het moet een ander station zijn. 2007 en 2009 kan zeker niet niet want dan zijn de sporen al verhoogd.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Ook voor File:PM NE 0073 09.jpg Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Valencia E PM 052022.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Valencia E PM 052022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Joanbanjo (talk) 01:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Le Raincy-F-PAR-044.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright unclear

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PMa 001048 B Gent StB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Carolus (talk) 17:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reise Reise (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PMadia 000277 NA NA.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Orden uw bestand AUB

Latest comment: 3 years ago12 comments3 people in discussion

Nogmaals, zou u uw eigen bestanden willen correct categoriseren, zodat andere vrijwilligers uw werk niet moeten opknappen? Graag een reactie aub.--Carolus (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Beste, ik besteed heel veel werk aan mijn fotobestanden, en deze zijn goed georganiseerd, hebben correcte informatie. Een en ander kan wel worden vervolledigd; ik doe heel veel opzoekingswerk, echter maar al te dikwijls vind ik weinig of zelfs geen informatie, ook niet in de erfgoedsites ...

Ok, bedankt voor je reactie, maar 1/ AUB je bijdragen ondertekenen, altijd. 2/ vraag hulp aan anderen en ten 3/ Je spreekt uzelf tegen: je passeert soms 2x op dezelfde plek: Je weet maw heel goed welke monumenten je uit kiest. Bovendien: niemand kan je bijdragen appreciëren als je zelf niet de moeite neemt om ze correct te ordenen. Zijn er zaken die je niet duidelijk begrijpt? --Carolus (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Beste, Er zijn inderdaad heel wat systemen binnen Wiki die ik niet beheers of begrijp. Dit heeft onder andere te maken met gebrek aan tijd, of beter gezegd: prioriteiten. Ik werk heel veel aan mijn fotodocumentatie over erfgoed, het kost mij heel veel tijd, energie en ook geld! Ik doe dit alles als professioneel fotograaf onbezoldigd, op een paar uitzonderingen na. Het is mijn eerste zorg verder te kunnen werken, wat niet wegneemt dat ik graag mijn beeldbestanden beter zou willen ordenen. Ondertussen zijn het ruim 37000 foto's over erfgoed, zie: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=PMRMaeyaert&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1

Ok, dat snap ik. Maar, er bestaan zeker oplossingen om deze grote hoeveelheid data te beheren, waarom heb je nooit aan iemand hulp gevraagd? We kunnen toch een oplossing zoeken, niet?--Carolus (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Hallo PMRMaeyaert, volgens Carolus heb je hulp nodig. De vraag is maar waarmee Lotje je kan helpen. :-) Lotje (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Beste "Lotje", "Carolus", Wellicht hebben jullie mijn bestanden ondertussen kunnen bekijken, en gezien hoe het is gestructureerd. Een goede vier jaar geleden heb ik 20000 beeldbestanden, foto's over erfgoed in Europeana gepubliceerd via het programma Locloud. Dat was zeer interessant en leerrijk. Er werd via Locloud een zgn "API" ontworpen zodat bestanden van Wiki naar Europeana kunnen worden getransfereerd. Toen heb ik voor het eerst gemerkt dat er van een aantal van mijn gepubliceerde beeldbestanden de bestandsnaam door iemand werd gewijzigd, wat het gehele werk eigenlijk zinloos maakt. Ik denk niet dat het er veel zijn, maar zulks is te vermijden! Bestandsnamen mogen niet worden gewijzigd, en sindsdien heb ik ze steeds herhaald als: Ref: ... Binnenkort zullen wellicht nog eens ruim 7000 bestanden via Europeana worden gepubliceerd, en ik wil dit nauwgezet opvolgen. Behalve enkele museumcollecties heb ik alle fotografie in eigen beheer gerealiseerd, initiatief, organisatie, financiering. Dit heeft mij heel wat energie, inzet en ook centen gekost, zelf gefinancierd. Het invoeren alleen van de identificatie en gegevens vraagt veel kennis ter zake, kunst, kunstgeschiedenis, bronnenonderzoek. Aldus wil ik niet dat iets van al dat werk verloren gaat. Ik heb tot nog toe alle gegevens op een eenvoudige en geüniformeerde wijze ingevoerd, wat veel discipline vergt. Al dit werk kan zeker worden verbeterd en bijgewerkt, maar dit moet zowel efficiënt als correct worden uitgevoerd. Dit betekent heel veel werk en kennis ter zake. Met vriendelijke groeten, Pol

Bedankt PMRMaeyaert voor de toelichting. Volgens mij moet er een mogelijkheid bestaan om het wijzigen van bepaalde bestandsnamen onmogelijk te maken, een optie zou natuurlijk zijn dat de software dit automatisch doet wanneer een bepaalde (zoals in jouw geval de markering: Ref:'... voorkomt en wanneer de bestanden deel uitmaken van een reeks, of, er kan standaard een "no rename" worden ingevuld. Hopelijk heb ik nooit een of andere bestandsnaam gewijzigd, maar gezien de afbeeldingen duidelijk geen #2-files zijn, zal dit (gelukkig) niet het geval zijn. Anderzijds, wanneer er een typo of een kemel van een taalfout in zou staan (#3), zou ik dit, zoals het er momenteel voorstaat, waarschijnlijk wel gedaan hebben.

Maakt deze file deel uit van een andere reeks? Deze zou ik dan vooreerst onmiddellijk onderbrengen in een nieuwe Category:Interior of the Église Saint-Quentin (Tournai) --> Category:Église Saint-Quentin (Tournai). Dan heb ik nog een vraagje: vind je het verstandig om overal je contactgegevens kenbaar te maken, zoals bijv. op je userpage? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 07:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Bijkomend onderzoek

Beste Lotje, kijk een voorbeeld van het probleem. Hoe los jij dit op?

rouwbord van een priester, zonder goede naam, 1 jun 2018 17:10
hetzelfde (1 jun 2018 17:10)

--Carolus (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Het plaatje is het zelfde, maar is niet gelijk in foto bewerkingen. Het blauw van de tweede is helderder en heeft waarschijnlijk iets meer contrast gekregen. Lidewij (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Dus, op die manier kan je wikipedia verzadigen van dezelfde afbeeldingen?--Carolus (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Carolus: ik zal er eens over nadenken.

Ik heb ook een vraagje voor jou: bevindt dit rouwbord zich in de Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Sint-Pieterskerk? Het blijkt namelijk niet direct uit de categorisatie hier, maar de afbeelding komt wél voor in de Fotogalerie met een (rode) link naar de Sint-Pietersabdijkerk. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Carolus: deze maakt dan misschien wel deel uit van een reeks (met goede naam?) maar de kwaliteit laat duidelijk te wensen over :-). Ik zou voorstellen, na het verwijderen van deze minder goede afbeelding, een van beide zoals hierboven te hernoemen, en er 1 te deleten. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@allen, ik heb zeker geen probleem met de kwaliteit van de afbeeldingen, maar 1 volstaat, mits voldoende groot en een correcte benaming. Het is onwenselijk Wikipedia te vervuilen met kopijen. Dus waarom verschaft Paul niet de correcte informatie in zijn afbeeldingen?--Carolus (talk) 14:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

BIJKOMENDE bedenking: als ik een dubbele afbeelding wil uploaden, dan zegt het systeem automatisch "stop", het is technisch toch niet mogelijk om 2 keer hetzelfde te uploaden? Bovendien is het me zeer onduidelijk hoe Paul de toestemming heeft gekregen om bepaalde kunstobjecten te fotograferen die uit de diocesane verzameling komen. Ik steek mijn licht eens op bij kanunnik Collin, want deze moet toestemming hebben gegeven, als verantwoordelijke namens de diocesane curie. Ik wil Paul nadrukkelijk vragen, om ondertussen geen nieuwe afbeeldingen up te loaden, en af te wachten. Kan @Multichill: even advies geven? bedankt. --Carolus (talk) 14:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Aan Lotje, Carolus, Al de ruim 37000 foto's die ik in Wiki heb gepubliceerd zijn correct geïdentificeerd, naar plaats, inhoud, op een paar uitzonderingen waar ik geen informatie heb gevonden. Dit betekent een enorm werk en inzet, dit is professioneel werk. Als ik zo eens kijk naar wat er allemaal werd gepubliceerd is dat toch heel wat anders. Ik herhaal dat ik verschillende keren heb gemerkt dat men wijzigingen heeft aangebracht, voornamelijk de bestandsnaam, en dit is problematisch. Een voorbeeld: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lessines_NDame_a_la_Rose_PM_089736.jpg Ik heb de foto in kwestie opgezocht en heb geen meerdere informatie over dat wapenschild, dat ik heb gefotografeerd in opdracht van de kerkfabriek van de Sint-Baafskathedaal. Dit moet in de periode geweest zijn van 1988-1989. Het origineel is een kleurnegatief 6x6cm. Hoe die foto twee keer voorkomt weet ik niet. Ik heb heel wat foto's van de kathedraal en de collecties, de originelen zijn telkens kleurdia's, grootformaat, sommige kleurnegatieven. Al die opnames heb ik gemaakt in opdracht voor diverse uitgevers, publicaties, telkens met akkoord van de kerkfabriek. Dit is allemaal gebeurd voordat Collin rector van de kathedraal was. Dit is publiek domein. Gezien het enorme werk, inzet, kennis die ik heb besteed aan het publiceren van meer dan 37000 foto's moet men uw opmerkingen over "vervuilen" als een ernstige belediging beschouwen.

Ondertussen heb ik de fout gecorrigeerd, het is een ander wapenschild waarvan ik helaas geen enkele informatie kan vinden.

File:Lessines NDame a la Rose PM 089736.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion

Hallo PMRMaeyaert, mag men ervan uitgaan dat met de beschrijving: triptyque entier de M.de Vos de schilder bedoeld wordt? Het ware misschien interessant de 4 afbeeldingen samen in 1 category onder te brengen dan. Wat denk je? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Bedankt voor het bericht. Ik voer meestal de gegevens in de oorspronkelijke taal, -Nederlands, Spaans, Frans, Catalaans, Duits- en in het Engels. Meestal, en de laatste twee/drie jaar, doe ik steeds opzoeking naar de juiste naam van de auteur, schilder, architect, en dat betekent meestal heel wat opzoekingswerk, via Wiki, en ook via veel andere kanalen, erfgoedsites. Er kunnen zeker heel wat "categorien" worden gecreëerd, maar dit vraagt -weeral- heel wat werk en kennis ter zake. Het is ook zo dat als er een foutieve benaming, titel of zo wordt ingevoerd het heel moeilijk is dit te achterhalen en corrigeren. Vandaar dat ik heel secuur de gegevens invoer, en als ik niet zeker ben het aanduid met een vraagteken, of het niet vermeld.

Beste, Om in te gaan op uw vraag tot creatie van "categorien" kan ik u zeggen dat al mijn beeldbestanden de gegeven hebben vervat in de metadata (IPTC). Dit betekent dat telkens iemand een bestand (gratis) oplaadt deze ook alle gegevens heeft. Sinds 4/5 jaar is het in Wiki mogelijk deze zichtbaar te maken onder "description". Het programma leest ook enkel de IPTC code onder beschrijving ("deescription"), en sindsdien verzamel ik alle gegevens daarin. Deze bevatten een hele reeks trefwoorden ("keywords") die kunnen worden gebruikt ter classificatie. Basis is altijd de bestandsnaam! De gegevens heb ik telkens genormaliseerd, gescheiden door een punt (. spatie). In die laatste 5 jaar heb ik ook mijn systeem kunnen standaardiseren naar betere bereikbaarheid naar de toekomst toe. Al de bestanden waar "iemand" de bestandsnaam heeft gewijzigd, en dat is meestal op zeer stupide wijze gebeurd, zijn de bestanden waardeloos geworden. Nog een voorbeeld: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Teruel,_C._Harzembusch-PM_52173.jpg Deze praktijk is een groot probleem binnen de "Wiki community". De personen die die bestandsnamen gewijzigd hebben dat blijkbaar willekeurig gedaan en vernietigen veel van mijn werk. Zij moeten op de vingers worden getikt want zij doen hiermee veel kwaad, en het wijzigen van de bestandsnamen is tevens helemaal zinloos! Ik heb lijsten van alle bestanden die ik heb gepubliceerd, en in de toekomst kan heel wat worden bijgewerkt, maar ik herhaal het: daar waar de bestandsnaam werd gewijzigd is enkel opnieuw opladen mogelijk. Het opzoeken is een heel groot werk, en ik ga dat niet doen door de schuld, onkunde, onwil, van een ander die zomaar deze bestandsnamen volgens zinloze willekeur heeft gewijzigd.

Mijn beste PMRMaeyaert, uit je (uw) reactie leidt ik boosheid en gefrustreerdheid af. Mijn excuses hiervoor.

Je (U) hebt niet direct mijn vraag beantwoord m.b.t. de deze file. Is het nou een schilderij van Maerten de Vos? Bevindt het zich in de trésor van de kathedraal? Kan je (U) dit alsnog expliciteren?
zopas nam ik de geschiedenis door van File:Teruel, C. Harzembusch-PM 52173.jpg. Waar het probleem zit, dat begrijp ik niet echt goed. Er had toch niemand de naam van de file gewijzigd? Of is het de bot waar je (U) een probleem mee hebt? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Het schilderij van het bestand 89736 is een schilderij, triptiek, van Maarten de Vos (1531-1604), van de Trésor de la Cathédrale de Tournai, een heel mooi en belangrijk werk. Goeiendag, Ik heb mijn foto's eens bekeken geordend volgens wijzigingen, en merk dat er van duizenden bestanden de naam is gewijzigd. Het is zelfs zo erg dat sommigen verwarrende tekens gebruiken als é of ñ,wat voor moeilijkheden zorgt. Al deze bestanden zijn nu onbruikbaar voor transfers, bvb via API. Blijkbaar beseffen velen nog niet dat een bestandsnaam niet dient voor zoekfunctie, dat gebeurt via de metadata. Aangezien ik de gegevens in de metadata heb ingevoerd kan men de bestanden vinden, als men trefwoorden gebruikt, of plaatsnamen, enz. Ik heb in Europeana 20000 beeldbestanden ingevoerd. ruim 8000 zijn nu ergens zoek, en men onderzoekt de oorzaak van dit fenomeen nu begin januari. Het kan dus zijn dat het deze wijzigingen van de bestandsnamen de oorzaak zijn, en zo ja zal men met Wiki overleggen om dit op te lossen. Als het zo is moeten al deze bestanden opnieuw worden ingevoerd wat heel veel werk betekent. Ik ga dit nu nog niet doen. Alle classificatiesystemen zijn gebaseerd op de bestandsnaam, alle zoekfuncties werken via de metadata. Aldus zijn al mijn foto's steeds beschikbaar, ze zijn te vinden, maar transfers zijn niet meer mogelijk. Ik kan dat enkel oplossen door de bestanden opnieuw in te voeren, Wiki zorgt ervoor dat alle bestandsnamen die al voorkomen worden geweigerd: goed zo. Aldus hebben mijn opmerkingen niets te maken mer enige frustratie, maar ik wil duiden op een probleem, dat wijst op een groot gebrek van kennis van veel medewerkers. Ik kan alleen maar aanraden dat men in de "community" dit meedeelt zodat men dit niet meer doet: naamsverandering is tijdrovend en totaal zinloos en probleemverwekkend. Heb mijn beste wensen voor een gelukkig jaar (zonder al die problemen en gevaren van de pandemie).

Goede morgen PMRMaeyaert op deze eerste dag van 2021.

Bedoel je het bij dit linkerpaneel, middenpaneel, rechterpaneel en deze triptiek geopend een schilderij betreft van Maerten de Vos (1532-1603). Die zouden dan toch samen kunnen worden ondergebracht in een separate category? :-) Lotje (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Maarten De Vos was een goed en belangrijk schilder, en een categorie aan hem toewijden ware nuttig. Inderdaad zijn de drie panelen van dezelfde schilder, zie de beschijvingen in de metadata.

Beste, Ondertussen heb ik opzoekingen gedaan en tot nog toe heb ik 7246 bestanden gevonden waarvan men de bestandsnaam heeft gewijzigd. Ik heb ook gemerkt dat men dat willekeurig heeft gedaan, en dat -helaas- ook dikwijls de gegevens werden uitgewist. Ook zijn er heel wat fouten ingeslopen. Een voorbeeld (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:27439_Oudenaarde_Eine_Sint-Eligiuskerk_21.jpg) waar men zelfs de locatie verkeerdelijk heeft gewijzigd (het is de Laurentiuskerk te ENAME). Dit alles betekent heel wat werk voor mij. De meeste gecorrumpeerde bestanden zijn nog bruikbaar dankzij de gegevens in de metadata, maar waar deze werden uitgewist of gewijzigd, zijn de bestanden totaal waardeloos. Ik ga zien of ik kan corrigeren door de corrupte bestanden opnieuw op te laden. Dubbele kunnen niet voorkomlen daar het programma Wiki dubbele bestandsnamen, weigert, gelukkig maar. Met vriendelijke groeten,

Beste, ik zou hiervan alvast eens werk van beginnen maken. Denk je niet? Lotje (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Bedankt voor het bericht. Helaas moet ik zeggen dat hoe verder ik zoek hoe meer ik gewijzigde bestanden vind. Dit betekent dat deze niet bruikbaar zijn voor transfer, bijvoorbeeld Europeana. De enige mogelijkheid is het heropladen, wat een heel groot werk betekent. Ik heb nu al 9239 items gevonden, en er komen er steeds bij. Men moet beseffen dat voor Wiki het belangrijk is dat -voornamelijk toekomstgericht- men de mogelijkheid van het gebruik stimuleert. Zoals gezegd is hiervoor de bestandsnaam essentieel. Dagelijks worden miljoenen fotobestanden via internet verspreid, de meeste van heel slechte kwaliteit, laat staan enige inhoud en informatie. Hier moet Wiki een onderscheid maken, zoals de artikelen steeds verbeteren (ik doe heem veel opzoekingswerk via Wiki, Nederlands Frans, Spaans, Engels, Duits en Catalaans) en ik merk nog steeds veel verschil in inhoudelijke kwaliteit als beschikbaarheid. Het best wat u kan doen is ruchtbaarheid geven aan dit fenomeen zodat men ophoudt met bestndsnamen wijzigen, het zinloos werk en creëert heel veel problemen, vooral naar de toekomst toe. Met vriendelijke groeten,

Beste, Ondertussen heb ik een beter zicht op de aangerichte ravage, en het gaat om duizenden beeldbestande. Ik heb er al heel wat gevonden, en het zijn er ruim 15000. Heel wat v an deze bestanden worden in veel sites gebruikt, bijvoorbeeld in erfgoed inventarissen. Doordat men bestandsnamen heeft veranderd riskeert dit op veel, of de meeste, niet meer te werken. Het ware aldus nuttig, zoniet noodzakelijk, dat men de Wiki community medewerkers adviseert dit nooit meer te doen. Het is overigens ook zo dat bestanden met dezelfde naam niet kunnen worde (dubbel) ingevoerd: een veiligheid die aldus ook al niet meer werkt. Ik heb nu enig overzicht, en ik schat dat het mij ongeveer 5 tot 10 dagen intensief en efficiënt werken zal kosten om de bestanden terug in te voeren onder hun oorspronkelijke benaming: allemaal verloren werk door onkunde (of onwil van sommigen?).

Dag, PMRMaeyaert. Het is jammer, want bijdragend aan onoverzichtelijkheid, dat u niet, zoals u al vaker is gevraagd, wenst te ondertekenen met vier tildes (~~~~), want het geeft het overleg een slordige aanblik. Maar het roept bij mij nog meer onbegrip op, dat u een voorbeeld geeft, namelijk File:27439 Oudenaarde Eine Sint-Eligiuskerk 21.jpg, van een bestand waarmee volgens u geknoeid zou zijn. Nu blijkt mij althans niet uit de bestandsgeschiedenis dat iemand dat bestand zou hebben hernoemd, dus het heeft er alle schijn van dat u zelf de bestandsnaam "27439 Oudenaarde Eine Sint-Eligiuskerk 21.jpg" heeft bedacht. Zorgerlijker echter, is dat het aanvankelijke bestand met die naam, dat inderdaad het interieur van de Sint-Eligiuskerk lijkt te tonen, door u zelf binnen twintig minuten is vervangen door een afbeelding van de Laurentiuskerk te Ename. Iedereen die de bestandspagina bekijkt kan dat onderaan de pagina – bij de Bestandsgeschiedenis, waar de oude en de nieuwe afbeelding zichtbaar zijn – duidelijk zien. Met andere woorden: u beticht anderen van het corrumperen van het bestand, terwijl u er hoogstpersoonlijk zelf voor verantwoordelijk bent. Het zou me niet verbazen, wanneer blijkt dat bij de duizenden andere bestanden waarover u spreekt, precies hetzelfde aan de hand is. Het volgende nummer in de reeks van uw voorbeeld, File:27439 Oudenaarde Eine Sint-Eligiuskerk 22.jpg, heeft namelijk exact hetzelfde probleem: u heeft op 15 september 2011 een bestand geüpload van de Sint-Eligius in Eine, dat u 18 minuten later heeft overschreven (met behoud van bestandsnaam), met een afbeelding van de Laurentiuskerk in Ename. Het gaat dan niet aan om anderen te betichten van een "ravage", want u bent er zelf verantwoordelijk voor. Een onwaarschijnlijke slordigheid, die u kennelijk bijna tien jaar later nog steeds niet heeft ingezien. Met vriendelijke groet, Eissink (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Laat ik eraan toevoegen, dat het me spijt dat het zo gelopen is, want het betreft een waardevolle collectie foto's. Misschien, maar daarover kunnen anderen beter adviseren dan ik, is het mogelijk om botmatig te achterhalen bij welke van uw afbeeldingen zo'n overschrijving heeft plaatsgehad, dan zouden die bestandspagina's kunnen worden voorzien van een soort waarschuwing. Misschien is het zelfs mogelijk om het overschrijvende bestand af te koppelen en naar een eigen pagina over te brengen, waarbij dan de aanvankelijke upload met de correcte bestandsnaam naar de uploadversie wordt teruggezet, zodat latere, vaak foutieve data niet meer zichtbaar is. Het is ongelukkig, maar er zijn in elk geval geen afbeeldingen verloren gegaan. Eissink (talk) 12:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Besrte: zoals u zegt zijn er geen afbeeldingen verloren gegaan, en zijn alle bestanden bereikbaar via de gegevens die ik in de metadata heb ingevoerd, en de gegevens die ik onder "beschroijving" (description) heb samengevoegd. Voortaan maak ik de vermelding de bestandsnamen niet te wijzigen. Ik heb gemerkt dat automatische vertaling gebruikt wordt, wat de zoekrfunctie's veel verbetert, bijvoorbeel het vertalen van de door mij gebruikte trefwoorden zijn in andere talen bereikbaar. Ik heb zeker fouten gemaakt, maar dan moet men beseffen dat alles sinds ruim 10 jaar is geëvolueerd, toen had ik trage internetverbinding, kon ik amper 50 bestenden in een ker opladen, mijn eigen fotoarchief is sindsdien ook beter georganiseerd, wat heel veel werk, kennis en inspanningen heet gevergd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs) 13:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Ja, ja, dat is allemaal prima: veel inspanningen, veel verbeteringen, veel werk, veel verzoeken om erkenning, er is veel veranderd, en dat alles in de zoveelste herhaling, maar ik heb u net gezegd dat u anderen heeft beticht van het veroorzaken van een ravage, terwijl u er zelf voor verantwoordelijk bent geweest, en ik zie hier geen enkele hand in eigen boezem. U bent hier op een samenwerkingsproject, voor het geval u dat loutere feit heeft gemist, niet in uw eigen archief. Succes verder met de zelfgecreëerde chaos. Eissink (talk) 13:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Als u anderen beschuldigt van naamswijzigingen en ravage, van misschien wel 15.000 bestanden, terwijl u feitelijk zelf degene bent die al die misverstanden heeft veroorzaakt, dan lijkt mij een soort excuus wel op zijn plaats. Laat het maar even inzinken, maar uw eerste reactie geeft mij weinig vertrouwen: die stelt ronduit teleur. Eissink (talk) 13:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Misschien kan Vysotsky adviseren hoe om te gaan met de overschreven bestanden zoals aangeduid in mijn bijdrage van 12:23 uur hierboven? Wie zou zoiets botmatig kunnen regelen, d.w.z. een soort disclaimer plaatsen op PMRMaeyaerts overschreven bestanden met foutieve bestandsnaam? PMRMaeyaert zelf gaat ondertussen gewoon door met uploaden en lijkt totaal niet geïnteresseerd in een oplossing, na eerst anderen te hebben beschuldigd van waarvoor hij zelf verantwoordelijk is. Eissink (talk) 14:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Sterrendag

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Het is vandaag sterrendag, de dag waarop we elkaar nog even extra bedanken voor een jaar vol enthousiasme en prachtige bijdragen.

Uit te reiken aan iemand die u afgelopen jaar positief opviel. Het idee is laagdrempelig; de ster hoeft niet ergens op een lijst ingeschreven te worden, slechts aanbieden als waardering. Het uitdelen ervan vindt plaats op 31 december, deelt u er ook eentje uit vandaag? Lotje (talk) 17:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

File:PM 092297 B Lessines.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago13 comments3 people in discussion

Hi PMRMaeyaert, who are he persons depicted in this sculpture, St. Joseph and child-Jesus? Could you add the name of the sculptor. --Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I verified the picture file, and can tell you that the sculpture is in the former hospital, actual museum, gardens. It seems to me a polychrome sculpture 20th century, and I think the name of the sculpture will be: anonymous. Anyhow I will contact the museum responsible. cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 12:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@PMRMaeyaert: zou je aub je overleg ondertekenen? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

oei, oei, ondertekenen: hoe moet dat?

Twee tildes na elkaar, zoals hierna ~~~~

Lotje (talk) 13:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Bedankt: nog iets dat ik heb bijgeleerd

Remember, 2 tildes !!!! Lotje (talk) 14:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Is dit nou een grapje, Lotje? Het onderteken gebeurt immers met vier tildes, niet met twee, zoals je zelf ook wel weet en zoals je zelfs hierboven met vier tildes hebt aangegeven. Twee tildes geeft dit resultaat: ~~. Vier tildes geeft: Eissink (talk) 14:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Sorry Eissink, foutieve interpretatie, tildes komen bij mij altijd per twee. Ik besef maar al te goed dat je het op je heupen krijgt van dat gedoe met PMRMaeyaert. Als je 't mij vraagt, is dit niet dezelfde persoon die eerdere uploads maakte. Zoniet, weet ik het ook niet meer. Een checkuser zou dit toch moeten kunnen uitvissen? Lotje (talk) 14:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

De bestandsgeschiedenis is glashelder. PMRMaeyaert heeft in 2011, en misschien ook later nog, fouten gemaakt bij het uploaden. Dat is geen ramp, maar het zou een begin zijn als dat wordt erkend, in plaats van anderen de schuld te geven. Eissink (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Inderdaad, makkelijk te traceren, voorbeeld: File:PM 092350 B Kluisbos.jpg en File:Kluisbos PM 092350 B.jpg. Een makkie voor PMRMaeyaert om de dubbele eruit te halen. Niet toch?

Lotje (talk) 15:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Lotje: Dat betreft duplicaten, dat is vrij eenvoudig op te lossen. Het voorbeeld dat PMRMaeyaert hierboven zelf aanhaalde, en waarop ik heb gereageerd, betreft een ander, groter probleem. Daar heeft de uploader een bestand geüpload, met een bestandsnaam die aangeeft wat de foto toont, en vervolgens, binnen een half uur, heeft hij een "nieuwe versie" op die bestandspagina geüpload, een afbeelding die een ander onderwerp heeft. Zie de beide verschillende foto's onder deze pagina (en waarschijnlijk dus heel veel andere pagina's), dat zijn niet alleen compleet verschillende afbeeldingen, maar ook verschillende kerken – zo krijg je dus afbeeldingen die niet overeenkomen met de bestandsnaam en ook niet met de beschrijving. Eissink (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

@Eissink: da's inderdaad iets wat enkel door de uploader naar behoren kan worden opgelost. Mocht dit een klas anno 1900 zijn, de leraar zou alles verwijderen en voor straf zou de leerling alles moeten overdoen. Pfffffffffffft Lotje (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Ja, maar ondertussen geeft de uploader anderen er de schuld van en gaat ondertussen, letterlijk op dit moment, fijn door duplicaten te uploaden, die anderen dan weer mogen verwijderen. Ik overweeg een instant blokkade aan te vragen, want deze gebruiker heeft momenteel een bord voor de kop. Eissink (talk) 15:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

@Túrelio: to come back to your question and to update you: there is another file duplicate by the same user. don't know which one should be deleted. Lotje (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Het gewijzigde bestand kan worden verwijderd, het originele werd terug ingevoerd. For Túrelio: both files are usable, don't care (cada fichero es utilisable, solo hay diferencia en el nombre de fichero). — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

AN/U

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

PMRMaeyaert, ik heb op Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User_PMRMaeyaert voorgesteld u per direct te blokkeren. U weigert niet alleen uw verantwoordelijkheid te nemen voor een geïdentificeerd probleem, maar u gaat ondertussen vandaag gewoon door met het uploaden van bestanden die in sommige (of alle?) gevallen duplicaten betreft. U bezorgt anderen een forse lading werk en u gaat maar door, en dat lijkt mij niet de juiste weg. U kunt reageren op de aangegeven plaats. Groet, Eissink (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Het probleem is dat het wijzigen van een bestandsnaam de mogelijkheden tot gebruik verminderen, het geen zin heeft, en tijdverlies betekent. Ik adviseer dat men dat niet meer doet, en ik heb gemerkt dat dit sinds enige tijd ook niet meer gebeurt. PMRMaeyaert 16:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Als dit uw verweer is, terwijl ik hierboven meermaals heb uitgelegd dat u de problemen zelf heeft veroorzaakt, en dat niemand de bestandsnamen heeft gewijzigd, dan hoop ik dat u snel wordt geblokkeerd, want u heeft geen idee wat u aan het doen bent en u weigert kennis te nemen van wat anderen u vertellen. Zo werkt dat niet. Eissink (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Beste Eissink, ik had graag het jaar anders ingezet; maar je hebt een punt. Hetzelfde als mij, ws. De meeste zaken die ik vroeg, werden vaak niet duidelijk beantwoord, en hij weigert om zijn logica van productie naar wikipedia aan te passen. Ik heb hem ook gevraagd even on-hold te gaan, en niets meer te uploaden, zolang het onderzoek loopt, maar dat verzoek legt hij naast zich neer. Heeft bemiddelen nog wel zin? Beste wensen, en veel succes.--Carolus (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Extra motif

Please, note that eg this work of art,Bisschops portret is currently protected by copyright. Nobody has permission of the diocese to reproduce this kind of art. PMayaert is aware of this restriction. Can this be deleted, and taken in his judgment? Kr---Carolus (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Beste Carolus, betekent dit dat deze afbeelding in principe niet mag worden toegevoegd (op geen enkel project)? Ik ga ervan uit dat, aangezien Arthur Luysterman het artikel over hem hoogstwaarschijnlijk volgt, hij misschien toch geen bezwaar zou hebben om dit te publiceren. Persoonlijk zou ik er de voorkeur aan geven de afbeelding toe te voegen. Misschien bezorgt hij commons zelfs een afbeelding van een betere kwaliteit. :-) Lotje (talk) 10:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Dit is een kunstwerk, en valt onder de auteursrechten van de maker, en dat is niet PMaeyaert, hij heeft hoogstwaarschijnlijk niet eens geschreven toestemming van de bevoegde kanunnik. En dit is niet de eerste keer.--Carolus (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 16:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC) Thanks for advising.

see request of dd 15 December 2020. Again. Thnx --Carolus (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Duplicates

Latest comment: 3 years ago14 comments4 people in discussion

Dear PMRMaeyaert, I really admire a lot of your uploads. But I can't help seeing lots of double photographs. Please stop importing new identical photographs, as I will mark them as duplicates, and they will then be removed. (Ik verontschuldig me dat ik u in het Engels aanspreek, maar dat is om een afhandelend moderator te laten zien dat ik u waarschuw om te stoppen met het inbrengen van dubbele foto's.) Vysotsky (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

I marked two photographs that you recently added as duplicates and here's why: they were both in lower resolution than the original ones, and both had less informative metadata. Take for example this file (the preferred one), with both object location and a link to Belgian heritage number 81703. It seems quite clear that the newly uploaded image had to be deleted. I understand you prefer the names of the new files. Could you tell us why? (In this case, the "old" name is also more informative.) Vysotsky (talk) 23:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I have indeed been oploading lots of pictures as these have been changed on filename, making them unusable for many database to use them. The very bfile you mention the new version uploaded had this information: Belgium. West-Vlaanderen. Anzegem. Tiegem, parochiekerk Sint-ArnoldusParochiekerk Sint-Arnoldus,buitenzicht, de vieringtoren, de spits. Tiegem. Parish church (Sint-Arnoldus). Exterior. The tower. Spire. . Cultural heritage; Cultural heritage|Monuments; Europe|Belgium; Europe|Belgium|West-Vlaanderen; Europe|Belgium|West-Vlaanderen|Anzegem; Europe|Belgium|West-Vlaanderen|Tiegem (Anzegem). Ref: PM_067104_B_Tiegem. Photo: Paul M.R. Maeyaert. www.polmayer.com.© Paul M.R. Maeyaert; pmrmaeyaert@gmail.com. DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAME. BESTANDSNAAM NIET WIJZIGEN. I hope that in the future no more file mames be changed. Cheers. MAEYAERT 4 jan 2021 23:54 (utc)

Give us one (1) example of a file that had it's name changed. The example file you mentioned earlier had not been subject to renaming.

Also: please explain how the name of a file could make a file unusable "for many database", and please provide examples of those databases.

And sign your posts.

Eissink (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC).

The old filenames of removed duplicates will still be there, and will carry a redirect to the kept preferred image. Whenever I will find extra information in the duplicated files, I will transport this information to the kept file. Vysotsky (talk) 00:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Vysotsky, please look at this, i tried to create a clear Category:Tomb of Philippe of Locquenghien and Valeria de Cotereau, but only doubles and doubles....they all should be renamed correctly, not on his conditions. thnx.--Carolus (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Done

@Vysotsky: PMRMaeyaert uploaded many thousands of pictures yesterday, and so far I haven't found one that was not a duplicate. As you know, they should all be deleted. Even if the older files have been renamed (I don't believe they were), that would not be a reason to not delete. Eissink (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC).

I agree, we should start from zero, and explain him the restricitions of wikipedia. Simple. New year= new start...and PLEASE; please make him stop uploading even more images, today. I will help him in future, to contribute, but not in this way of working. Than someone else may clean up the mess. Thx --Carolus (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@PMRMaeyaert: @Vysotsky: deze vraag had ik eerder op hier gesteld (waarschijnlijk verkeerdelijk), echter zonder gevolg, vandaar deze herhaling: What to do with the double images in (for example) Category:Chapelle Notre-Dame de la Paix (Ellezelles) Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Done

@PMRMaeyaert: Er zijn er hier 3. Graag je stellingname. Lotje (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Done

Dat is helder en standaard op Commons: van dezelfde afbeeldingen blijft de oudste over. De ander is een duplicaat. De lichtere versie blijft, want die is anders. Vysotsky (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposal: I will deduplicate all photographs from this collection. I will try to bring all useful information to the file with the highest resolution (in most cases: the first uploaded version). This will take several months. If you have any further suggestions, don't hesitate to bring them up. Vysotsky (talk) 10:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

There's one important condition: no new duplicate photographs. This is very important, as new double files will only cause frustration, trouble and extra work. Vysotsky (talk) 10:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Beste: Dubbele bestanden zijn natuurlijk vervelend. Als u bestanden wil verwijderen dan bewaart u best deze die ik opnieuw, met veel werk en moeite, terug heb opgeladen te bewaren, onder andere omdat ze dikwijls meer gegevens bevatten. Het is zo dat bij vele bestanden niet alleen de bestandsnaam werd gewijzigd, maar ook de gegevens onder beschrijving werden gewijzigd (wat mag, maar zeer onverstandig werd gedaan). OP veel plaatsen werden zelfs alle gegevens verwijderd, waardoor het bestand helemaal niet meer kan worden gevonden door zoekmachienes en zo goed als waardeloos wordt: enkele voorbeelden: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orl%C3%A9ans,_Cath%C3%A9drale_Sainte-Croix-PM_68198.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Monestir_de_Poblet-PM_26290.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gravenkapel_Kortrijk.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

Thank you for replying. The filenames of these 3 examples were never changed on Commons, as far as I can see (check the History tab). As to double files: the images in lower resolution will be changed into a redirect to the files in higher resolution, and relevant descriptions will be moved to the kept files. Vysotsky (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, As I never change file names it is sure tha in the cases mentioned the file names have been changed withis commons. As far as I could see until now, changing filename is never registered, and is part of the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

Dear Paul Maeyaert, No, every change is registered, see your example (no changes) and an example where the file name has been changed: this one. The only time you won't see changes with the file itself is in the case of duplicates, because the extra file is now only a redirect, see this redirect. That's one of the reasons one should not upload duplicates. Vysotsky (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Moregem

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo PMRMaeyaert, mag men ervan uitgaan dat deze en deze afbeelding ook in Moregem werden genomen? Zo ja kan ik ze daarin onderbrengen, dat zijn er dan meteen weer 2 minder in de Category:Photographs by User:PMRMaeyaert (uncategorized) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

New uploads

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dear PMRMaeyaert, I noticed you are now busy uploading new images. As far I can see, there are no doubles as yet. Will you please make sure you won't upload any doubles? We still need to deduplicate thousands of your old uploaded doubles, so uploading new double photographs will have serious consequences. Vysotsky (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

please be aware, that everyone has asked him to stop uploading MULTIPLE TIMES. --Carolus (talk) 09:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

There are no doubles in the new uploads. I have no objection against the uploading of images of cultural heritage from Belgium, Spain, Bolivia et al. The images of Maeyaert are used at least 2300 times, in many different language versions of Wikipedia. I see the old problems, and I help to erase them. Thank you for doing the same. Vysotsky (talk) 11:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

No, he must go. Do it yourself, alone. No mercy. --Carolus (talk) 12:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

List of Mayaert's duplicate's - Cleaning of Commons

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This list is made by all, to alert the community of the poor work quality of PMRMayaert. Be aware: some of the images can have slightly different light balance, clouding or cropping, but they have the same result. We sould not keep the same images of monuments; with different clouding in the air => that is not the point of Commons, right? Please feel free to protect and clear Commons of duplicate's. Thank you--Carolus (talk) 09:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

List of 12-01-2021

Consuegra-PM 65463.jpg
Consuegra-PM 65464.jpg
Collonges-la-Rouge, Hôtel Beaurival PM 18599.jpg
Collonges-la-Rouge, Hôtel Beaurival PM 18598.jpg
Coll de Nargó, Sant Climent-PM 61334.jpg
Coll de Nargó, Sant Climent-PM 61332.jpg
Codalet, Saint-Michel de Cuxa PM 47306.jpg
Codalet, Saint-Michel de Cuxa PM 47309.jpg
Châtel-de-Neuvre, église Saint-Laurent PM 44930.jpg
Châtel-de-Neuvre, église Saint-Laurent PM 44939.jpg
Château de Miromesnil PM 62743.jpg
Château de Miromesnil PM 62744.jpg
Château de Miromesnil PM 62745.jpg
Cahors, Le Pont Valentré PM 30689.jpg
Cahors, Le Pont Valentré PM 30690.jpg
File:Amiens PM 092493 F.jpg
Amiens PM 092492 F.jpg
Angers PM 093961 F.jpg
Angers PM 093962 F.jpg
Arras F PM 023983.jpg
Arras F PM 023984.jpg
Auxerre, Cathédrale Saint-Etienne PM 64853.jpg
Auxerre, Cathédrale Saint-Etienne PM 64854.jpg
Avila Basilica de San Vicente PM 73649 E.jpg
Avila Basilica de San Vicente PM 73655 E.jpg
Avila PM 073649 E.jpg
Avila PM 073652 E.jpg
Avila PM 073655 E.jpg
Baeza PM 091487 E.jpg
Baeza PM 091486 E.jpg
Barbera del Valles E PM 028076.jpg
Barberà del Vallès, Església de Santa Maria-PM 28076.jpg
Barcelona E PM 006343.jpg
Barcelona E PM 006346.jpg
Barcelona PM 06383.jpg
Barcelona PM 06384.jpg
Barcelona PM 18977.jpg
Barcelona PM 18978.jpg
Barcelona, Casa del Baró de Castellet-PM 15899.jpg
Barcelona, Casa del Baró de Castellet-PM 15902.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46483.jpg Done
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46492.jpg Done
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46711.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46712.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46723.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46722.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46721.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46731.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46733.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46732.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46738.jpg
Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Vézelay PM 46740.jpg
Braga, Bom Jesus do Monte PM 33947.jpg Done
Braga, Basílica do Bom Jesus do Monte (19).jpg Done
Breda NL PM 060260.jpg Done
Breda NL PM 060262.jpg Done
Brussel B PM 056850.jpg Done
Brussel B PM 056851.jpg Done
Brussel B PM 056852.jpg Done

List of 16-01-2021

PM 123285 B Sint Niklaas.jpg0
PM 123286 B Sint Niklaas.jpg
PM 123303 B Sint Niklaas.jpg
PM 123306 B Sint Niklaas.jpg

Reactions

All duplicates will be removed in 2021. There are several hundreds more. I don't make lists, I just add the duplicate tag. See Category:Duplicate. Vysotsky (talk) 11:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

I will continue to make list, so everyone can see for themselve, the mess that he made. The only way to make the point. No mercy. --Carolus (talk) 12:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

New Double images - request for blocking

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Again, this problems still continues. Done, i will try to get you blocked today, after uploading identical images. No other options.--Carolus (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

File:PM 132864 B Schorisse.jpg
File:PM 132863 B Schorisse.jpg

--Carolus (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

These images are not identical. As from last week, User:PMRMaeyaert has not uploaded any double images, as far as I can see. Vysotsky (talk) 11:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

COM:AN/B

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 049517 F Douaumont.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:PM 049511 F Douaumont.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049511 F Douaumont.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labattblueboy (talk) 20:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Lleida

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Dear PMRMaeyaert, First I want to thank you for the work of photographing the city of Category:Lleida. Then remind yourself of the importance of subcategorizing your photos so as not to oversaturate the initial category and make them easier for the community to find. This time I did it but it would have been better if you had done it. A big hug.--AlbertRA (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hola, Ahora tengo 7247 fotos del patrimonio cultural en Catalunya disponible, tan en Wiki que en Europeana. Es significa un trabajo importante, casi imposible para un persona a ingresar todos datos que sean interesante. También hay que tenir en cuenta que todo eso lo he organizado, seleccionado las temas, y financiado (!) yo mismo, una persona. Muchas fotos son unicas, como me he concentrado a temas fuera de lo mas conocido, pero de valor. Así sea interesante de ingresar categorias, pero yo no tengo la posibilidad de crear lo. Se pueden contactar me en "català", lo entiendo (lo entems?). — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

Dear Paul Maeyaert, Thanks for uploading so many interesting images. But you really underestimate yourself, when saying: "Así sea interesante de ingresar categorias, pero yo no tengo la posibilidad de crear lo." It's easy to add categories, and even more easy when you have as much knowledge about cultural heritage as you have. Do not hesitate to give it a try next time. Remember: people will be able to find your images much easier, and usage on and off Wiki will be stimulated. See for example Simon de Pape or Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Hemelvaartkerk (Nukerke). Vysotsky (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Paul; as before; please stop with uploading images. They are very poor quality. You do not have any usefull special focus, just general interrest. Besides even here, people need to clean your mess. When will you accept Wikipedia common skills? --Carolus (talk) 00:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I have to contradict that negative statement. The photographs by Paul Maeyaert could benefit from uploading in higher resolution, but most photographs are quite nice, as can be seen easily, e.g. in usage of recent uploads such as Rupelmonde. Maeyaert have been uploading since 2011, and his photographs are used at least >6000 times on-Wiki, which proves that I am not the only one who likes his photographs (and certainly not the only one hoping he will continue uploading). Vysotsky (talk) 10:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I received some messages about creating categories, what should be very useful. I can help with this as I can make lists with all metadata of selected files from my archive within seconds. In this way one can have a good overview of. All metadata contain information about location, sub location, country, and also a brief description in English and/or the original language. There are also a series of keywords specific for Cultural Heritage, at the moment 84 thematic. Cheers. Further on I can tell you that all image files have been transferred to Europeana, what was a rather complicated work that is done now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

File:PM 110421 Liebig Chromos.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo PMRMaeyaert, de beschrijving aan dit bestand, daar vroeg ik me af waar dit ergens na te lezen is. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Beste, het betreft een beeldje van mijn collectie Liebig cromos. De tekst heb ik gekopiëerd van de achterkant van de prentjes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

In de beschrijving staat het ook helder: Text on reverse:. Vysotsky (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Bedankt! mooi plaatje overigens, verdient ergens een plaatsje meen ik. :-) Lotje (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PM 119976 B Petegem.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PM 119976 B Petegem.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ju Ta 08:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

copyright violation - bis.

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Opnieuw, Stop ermee. Dank.

File:PM 133558 E Gent.jpg

File:PM 133558 E Gent.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Carolus (talk) 20:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

File:PM 037802 F Millau.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 037802 F Millau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Sint Janskerk (Poperinge)

Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

@PMRMaeyaert: bestaat er een reden voor om deze afbeeldingen als "Parochiekerk Sint-Victor. Poperinge." beschrijven? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 06:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

nagekeken: https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/erfgoedobjecten/31302 — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

Zowel de foto met het beeld (IOSEPHE VAN DOLRE) als het orgel uit 1765 lijken uit de St. Janskerk in Poperinge te komen (beschrijving hier). De Sint-Victorskerk heeft een modern orgel (zie hier). Vysotsky (talk) 20:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

inderdaad, dit betreft de Sint-Janskerk bedankt voor de hulp den de correctie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

Nog altijd moeten wij achter je opruimen, stop er toch mee, dan bewijs je dit project een dienst.--Carolus (talk) 08:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Ik ben zo vrij het met die stelling oneens te zijn. Maeyaert heeft Wiki verrijkt met meer dan 40.000 afbeeldingen, die over het algemeen redelijk goed beschreven zijn. Zijn foto's worden in vele taalversies van Wiki gebruikt, in totaal nu al meer dan 6600 keer. Categorisering volgens de principes van Commons is niet iets waar Maeyaert zich druk mee bezig houdt, maar een van de kenmerken van Wiki is juist de samenwerking tussen gebruikers: de een is goed in A, een ander in B en een derde in C. Samenwerking zorgt voor een optimaal resultaat. Het glas is in dit geval meer dan halfvol, en in coöperatie wordt het alleen maar voller. Ik hoop dat Maeyaert nog lang foto's blijft maken. Vysotsky (talk) 09:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Ik doe mijn best, het maken van de foto's betekent heel veel werk, vergt veel kennis. Het opzoeken van gegevens is op zich al een job ... Met vriendelijke groeten — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

@PMRMaeyaert: bedankt voor het checken. Ik vroeg me af hoe dat in zijn werk gaat wanneer fouten geslopen zijn bij de inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be. Wordt men er verwittigd zoals bv. bij het Commons:Bundesarchiv gebeurt? Een agentschap zoals Onroerend Erfgoed (agentschap) wordt imo verondersteld correcte informatie te verspreiden, of who controls the controllers ?

Lotje (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Beste, voor Belgische onderwerpen informeer ik mij via Wiki, en vooral de erfgoedsites en BALAT (KIK/IRPA). Ik heb tot nogtoe geen enkele fout gevonden; het zoeken is niet steeds eenvoudig. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.109.178.20 (talk) 06:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

File:PM 037779 F Millau.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File:PM 037779 F Millau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

why??? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.109.181.161 (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

See the website of the Compagnie Eiffage du Viaduc de Millau (CEVM). Sad but true. Vysotsky (talk) 11:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

7000

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Congrats. Your photographs are now used >7000 times across Wiki. (Details here). Thanks for the new uploads. Vysotsky (talk) 11:52, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Beschrijving bij afbeeldingen

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo PMRMaeyaert, misschien wil je de beschrijving van 1 en 2 afbeeldingen van jouw hand :-) eigenhandig aanpassen/vervolledigen? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Done, conform Luc Devliegher: De Sint-Salvatorskathedraal te Brugge. Inventaris. Tielt, Amsterdam, Lannoo, 1979. ISBN 9020900781 (=Kunstpatrimonium van West-Vlaanderen, deel 8). Vysotsky (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

File:PM 086368 F Ermenonville.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of: File:Ermenonville PM 086368 F.jpg
There should be only one exact copy of a file.
After replacing all instances with the preferred file, this file will be speedily deleted.

This file has been tagged by ArchiverBot (talk · contribs · count · global contribs)

Baidax ^💬 14:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:PMa B 537 Tournai.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PMa B 537 Tournai.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PMa B 537 Tournai.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anvilaquarius (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, the file metadata and description as "Toulouse-Lautrec" are obviously wrong. The signature of this work that is clearly post-1945 says "Godefroid A.", so I think maybe of Alain Godefroid, a living artist. The "own work" is wrong anyway, only the photo is yours, and you cannot license an artwork by someone else like that. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

This painting is indeed from Godefroid A., can't find his first name.

Thanks for correcting. 94.109.138.2 09:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

File:PMa B 622 Tournai.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PMa B 622 Tournai.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Jean Winance died in 1999, clearly this is not an "own work" by the uploader

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Anvilaquarius (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	Merry Christmas PMRMaeyaert
	Hi PMRMaeyaert, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, Lotje (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Millau-PM 37773.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tarragona PM 096968 E.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tarragona PM 096968 E.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stang^★ 14:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Tag removed, as there is no permission needed: Freedom of Panorama in Spain, check Commons on Copyright in Spain. -- Vysotsky (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Avila PM 073576 E.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Avila PM 073576 E.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: I am the author of this version. It was a test page. Please, delete and redirect to the definitive version: File:Avila Catedral PM 73576 E edited.jpg Avila Catedral PM 73576 E edited.jpg)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Lojwe.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Categorieën op wiki commons

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Beste PMRMaeyaert

U uploadt prachtige foto's, maar helaas meestal zonder categorie. Ik heb een eerste reeks ingedeeld. Mag ik u verwijzen naar de gebruikerspagina van Dendermonde-prenten? Bedankt en groet Terebra (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Beste, uw opmerking is terecht. Helaas kan ik mij gezien het grote aantal niet permitteren categorien in te voeren. Ook om fouten te vermijden laat ik het liever over aan medewerkers van Wiki. Mijn foto's hebben overigens heel wat informatie in de metadata.

Met vriendelijke groeten, PMRMaeyaert (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 041078 B Maarkedal.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo PMRMaeyaert, is dit een Category:Shadow of the photographer? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Metz, Cathédrale Saint-Etienne-PM 49650.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Metz, Cathédrale Saint-Etienne-PM 49650.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fredamas (talk) 19:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 049659 F Metz.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 049659 F Metz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fredamas (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PM 147411 B Brugge.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Copyright status: File:PM 147411 B Brugge.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PM 147411 B Brugge.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:PM 146430n B Oudenaarde.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Resolved. (License was removed by mistake). Vysotsky (talk) 08:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 147457 B Mons.jpg

And also:

Work of Miró can't be uploaded to Commons: Miró died in 1983. Yours sincerely, Vysotsky (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 147102 B Oostende.jpg

And also:

Works by Joris Ghekiere (1955-2016) are still under copyright. Yours sincerely, Vysotsky (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 147293 B Deinze.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Henxter (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 147320 B Deinze.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 147320 B Deinze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 147340 B Deinze.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 147340 B Deinze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 14:13, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 137986 B.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Henxter (talk) 14:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 147280 B Deinze.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 147280 B Deinze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 14:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 147287 B Deinze.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 147287 B Deinze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 14:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 147334 B Deinze.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 147334 B Deinze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 14:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 146227n B Gent.jpg

And also:

File:PM 146228n B Gent.jpg

Works by Paul Delvaux are under copyright. Yours sincerely, Vysotsky (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 146202n B Gent.jpg

And also:

File:PM 146203n B Gent.jpg

Oskar Kokoschka died in 1980 (works copyrigthed). Yours sincerely, Vysotsky (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 147131 B Oostende.jpg

And also:

Works not in the public domain (Willink died in 1983, Ernst in 1976, Axell in 1972 etc.). Yours sincerely, Vysotsky (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

File:PM 147465 B Mons.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 147465 B Mons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vysotsky (talk) 00:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

File:PManeg 0720-10 B Oudenaarde.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@PMRMaeyaert: weet je nog wanneer de foto genomen werd? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Ondertussen werden gegevens bijgevoegd, en heb ik de juiste naam van Cecile (?) vernomen: Cecile Velghe

Met vriendeloijke groeten PMRMaeyaert (talk) 10:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PM 146208n B Gent.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Congrats

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear PMRMaeyaert, Congratulations: the total number of images you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons now stands at 45,319. Total usage across all Wikis is now 9000 times. Distinct images used: 4037 (=ca. 9% of all your uploads). Of course, numbers are not the most important aspect of your work here, but I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wiki. Vysotsky (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

File:PM 056841 B Brussel.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PM 056841 B Brussel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stratoswift (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

File:PM 056845 B Brussel.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File:PM 056845 B Brussel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stratoswift (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Ik begrijp niet waarom men deze foto's wil verwijderen: foto's uit de collectie's van een museum, Brussel, publiek domein ... PMRMaeyaert (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Don't worry. Only the doubles are deduplicated. The original uploads are kept. Vysotsky (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

File:PM 142639 F Steenvoorde.jpg

Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bonjour @PMRMaeyaert il y a erreur la photo présentée. Ce n'est pas le moulin à vent dit Moulin du Sud (Drievenmeulen) de Steenvoorde, mais du Moulin de la Roome à Terdeghem Moulin de la Roome.

Camera location	50° 48′ 19.34″ N, 2° 32′ 43.65″ E	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

Bien cordialement à vous Pierre André ^(talk) 21:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Merci pour votre correction. Pour bien faire la correction, il me faut changer le nom de fichier: PM_142639_F_Terdeghem.

Vous pourriez m'aider pour ce faire? PMRMaeyaert (talk) 07:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Voyez ici.

Done Vysotsky (talk) 09:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:PMadia 000269 NA NA.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Lobbes B PM 063933.jpg

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Idw/layout Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Lobbes B PM 063902.jpg

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lobbes B PM 063902.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Template:Idw/lang

Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)