Vida Nova

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vida Nova!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations

Hi, if you nominate a file for (speedy) deletion, you must specify a deletion reason. Jcb (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

---

 

You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

--Amitie 10g (talk) 23:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Erreur langues romanes en Auvergne Rhône-Alpes

Le francoprovençal ou arpitan ne fait pas partie de la langue d'oïl. Il y a trois grands domaines de langues romanes en France: oïl, oc et arpitan. A défaut d'une modification de votre part, la carte sera corrigée. Savoyerli (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Oui bien entendu : Mais l'arpitan ne figure pas dans la partie langue d'oïl, le seul le bourbonnais fait face à cette catégorie.

Quoi qu'il en soit, merci pour votre carte! Je chargerai une proposition plus claire et plus précise. A bientôt

Erreur langue provençal

Bonjour, Le nissart est un dialecte du Provençal. Le Nissart est seulement parlé à Nice et un peu dans les vallées de l'ancien Comté de Nice (qui lui même est un ancien territoire provençal). La majorité de l'Arrondissement de Nice parle le provençal-alpin. Si tu veux plus de détails pour les dialectes du provençal il faut aller ici car la carte est bien traité commune par commune. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mentonasque Malgré ton erreur qui doit être rectifier tu fais de belles cartes. Jejesga06 (talk) 21:23, 02 Juillet 2016 (UTC)

Merci de ton message,

Je m'engage à la rectifier dès que je le peux et je re-upload la version correct. Merci de ces informations !: Aavitus (talk), 04 Juillet 2016 (UTC)

De rien c'est moi qui te remercie pour le beau travail que tu réalises !

Jejesga06 (talk) 21:14, 04 Juillet 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 07:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Cartes

Bonjour, je voulais savoir avec quel logiciel faites-vous vos cartes ? Merci beaucoup Giettois (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, alors je procède tout simplement avec paint (souvent victime d'une mauvaise réputation mais très utile lorsqu'on sait s'en servir) puis pour améliorer la qualité de l'image ou rajouter un fond supplémentaire j'utilise PicsArt, mais tout autre logiciel de "montage" doit convenir. Au plaisir de vous avoir renseigné, n'hésitez pas à demander si vous avez toute autre question Aavitus :

File:La Sainte Famille de Jean Gossaert.jpg

File:La Sainte Famille de Jean Gossaert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Langues d'oïl Walter.svg

Bonjour,

J'ai conservé le fichier File:Langues d'oïl Walter.svg de Oie blanche. J'ai aussi corrigé « OCCITAN » en « LANGUE D’OC » est-ce que tout est bon maintenant ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour ! Merci beaucoup pour votre travail, c'est parfait ! Cordialement. --Aavitus (talk) 12:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Carte langues régionales Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes

Bonsoir. Pour les fichiers vectoriels, j'utilise le logiciel Inkscape. Pour faire les cartes, j'utilise des modèles comme la carte de France avec les communes : France (Communes).svg (j'ai regroupé les communes par département) ou Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes - préfectures et départements.svg. J'enlève les éléments qui ne m'intéresse pas et pour la carte des langues, j'ai superposé ce modèle au fichier .png afin de faire les contours des contours des régions linguistiques.

En espérant avoir répondu à ta question. Cordialement Chabe01 (talk)

Image without license

File:Langue auvergnate en Europe - Arvernophonie.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bizà Neirà couverture.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bizà Neirà couverture.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your message. I created this file by myself but it's an copy of a logotype of this magazine. I did it but I'm waiting an authorization from publishing committee. Which kind of licensing can I use when I'll have the agreement ? Thanks. --Aavitus (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

RE: User:Matt414

Hello, thanks for your message. I checked Matt414's contributions, and it looks like everything he uploaded has been deleted. I'll keep an eye on his account in case he tries to reupload the deleted files. If he does, we'll discuss the matter with one of the admins or refer it to the User Problems noticeboard. AshFriday (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Paul Duchon - Varennes sur Allier.jpg

Copyright status: File:Paul Duchon - Varennes sur Allier.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Duchon - Varennes sur Allier.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Langue provençale.png

File:Langue provençale.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jejesga06 (talk) 20:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Do not remove {{Delete}} templates

Please do not remove {{Delete}} templates, like you did here. If you disagree with a deletion request, comment in the deletion request discussion, instead. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Berbers Mosaic.jpg

File:Berbers Mosaic.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: File:IbnBattatuEffendi.jpg deleted as copyvio at Commons:Deletion requests/File:IbnBattatuEffendi.jpg present in both revisions. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Finnusertop (talk) 01:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ancien occitan.png

Bonjour Aavitus. Pourrais-tu apporter une petite correction de noms dans Ancien occitan.png ? Il s'agit de "Poitou", qui est plus au nord (sud des départements Deux-Sèvres, Vienne et Vendée), et ajouter "Saintonge" (et éventuellement "Angoumois", mais pas la place) aux départements de Charente-Maritime et Charente ? Sinon la limite est exacte, bravo pour cette carte. Merci d'avance. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 05:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done J'ai fait moi-même la correction, avec IrfanView. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Chevet - église - Buxières-sous-Montaigut.jpg

File:Chevet - église - Buxières-sous-Montaigut.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 21:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Abbatiale d'Évaux-les-Bains.jpg

File:Abbatiale d'Évaux-les-Bains.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 21:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

You have added inappropriate speedy requests to this image four times ([1], [2], [3], [4]) and all of been declined. The file, further, was recently kept at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abbatiale d'Évaux-les-Bains.jpg over your objection. If you continue to request deletion for reasons already adjudicated, or otherwise continue to edit disruptively, you will be blocked from editing. Эlcobbola _talk 19:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Contrary to the warning above, you've continued to disruptively remove valid licensing information and request inappropriate speedies. Эlcobbola _talk 20:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Vida Nova,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Abd al Rahman III.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 20:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Langue gasconne.png

File:Langue gasconne.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Carte Langues d'Oc.png

File:Carte Langues d'Oc.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Langue auvergnate au XIIème siècle.png

File:Langue auvergnate au XIIème siècle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Vida Nova,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Vida Nova,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Abd Al Rahman I.png

Two years ago, you requested the move of file File:Abd Al Rahman III.png to File:Abd Al Rahman I.png claiming it was "Copy of a painting of Abd ar-Rahman the first, not the third." On what basis did you reach this conclusion? The description itself refers to Abderrahman III, and both Getty Images and Alamy have versions of this engraving, both naming the caliph in question as Abd ar Rahman III. Further, this seems to be the image that served as the inspiration for one of the Spanish postage stamps featuring Abd al-Rahman III. Yes, the image is used a lot online, including on his Wikipedia page, as Abd al-Rahman I but is is far from clear to me that this is the case and that Getty, Alamy, and the file's own description is wrong. Agricolae (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Mapas sus l'occitan

Bon ser, Aavitus. Ai vist qu'as descategoritzat fòrça de las tiás mapas sus l'occitan e las as mogudas a Category:Incorrect maps. As considerat d'importar una version corrècta dels fichièrs? Aital pas perdriam de tantas mapas.--Foguera (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Bonjorn Foguera ! Òc-ben, ai categoritzat en "wrong maps" perque vau far aquelhs jorns pro de modificacions sobre aquelas cartas ambé referencias mai academicas ! --Aavitus (talk) 11:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Perfièch, mercés! --Foguera (talk) 15:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Mas de res ! Un pichon exemple amb'aquo. --Aavitus (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BNC.png

Copyright status: File:BNC.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BNC.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Carte linguistique du Puy-de-Dôme.png

File:Carte linguistique du Puy-de-Dôme.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Croissant (linguistique).png

File:Croissant (linguistique).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Proto-arverno-limousin et proto-arpitan

Adissiatz,

Why have you reduced the northern border of Occitan to the departmental boundaries? They should extend at least to the Von Wartburg line, if not the borders of the Visigothic kingdom.

Pourquoi avez-vous réduit la frontière nord-occitan aux limites départementales? Ils devraient s'étendre au moins jusqu'à la ligne Von Wartburg, sinon aux frontières du royaume wisigothique.

La version de 2018 me sembla melhor.

Veire aquestas fonts:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Linguae_in_Galloromania.svg

https://ontsacaba.blogspot.com/2018/07/

http://dante.univ-tlse2.fr/4047/7/dussouchaud_olivier_M22017pdf.pdf (pagina 14)

BrennodAloisi (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Bonsoir. J'ai fais avec les informations que j'avais à ce moment. Mais il y a encore du travail dessus. Il faudrait d'ailleurs regrouper les deux ensembles vert et beige ensemble finalement. Il s'agit en effet d'un ensemble latin tardif parlé dans le royaume wisigoth. Je l'ai lu récemment dans JP Chambon. --Vida Nova (talk) 21:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Proto-arverno-limousin et proto-arpitan (V-VIe siècles).png

Copyright status: File:Proto-arverno-limousin et proto-arpitan (V-VIe siècles).png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Proto-arverno-limousin et proto-arpitan (V-VIe siècles).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Mornac (bandit).jpg

File:Mornac (bandit).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

File copyright status

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Limite nord du Croissant en région Centre val de Loire.

Bonjour Vida Nova, Votre nouvelle carte de l'Allier montre un recul vers le sud de la limite oc/oïl. Je comprends que vous prenez en compte les travaux récents du CNRS mais cela me conduit à vous poser trois questions : - cette limite a-t-elle reculé depuis les recherches de Tourtoulon, Escoffier et d'autres ? - la différentiation marchois/arverno-bourbonnais n'est-elle pas pertinente ? - l'extrapolation de la limite vers l'ouest laisse supposer que les communes marchoises en CVL se limitent aux communes limitrophes de la Creuse, pouvez-vous mettre à jour les cartes du Cher et de l'Indre ? Merci, Cordialement. Bernieyrou (talk) 14:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Limite occitan/arpitan sur les nouvelles cartes linguistiques pour la Loire et l'Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes

Bonjour Vida Nova,

Pourquoi avez-vous attribué contrairement au consensus linguistique un grand nombre de communes arpitanes comme étant des communes occitanes, même dans quelques cas au nord-ouest du département de l'Ain comme étant des communes de langue d'oïl, lorsque la majorité des sources l'attribuent correctement à l'espace linguistique arpitan. De même, quelques communes qui sont sans aucun doute occitanes en Isère deviennent tout à coup arpitanes (par exemple : Rencurel et Villard-de-Lans). Les deux cartes de l'Atlas sonore des langues régionales de France, qui semblent être la source pour votres cartes, ne sont pas du tout correct à cet égard !

Mes sources principales sont les livres « Le Francoprovençal » (2007) par Gaston Tuaillon et « Le patois de Saint-Jean-Soleymieux » (2005) par Jean Chassagneux, ainsi que la thèse « Limite entre les dialectes occitans et arpitans au sud du Forez » (2018) par Ludovic Noirie (correction de l'attribution des communes d'Unieux et Firminy comme des communes occitanes ; elle contient aussi une énumération complette de toutes les communes occitanes qui forment ensemble la frontière sud de l'arpitan en Loire, p. 6, et une carte linguistique du département de la Loire plus correct que celle de l'Atlas Limsi, p. 7 !).

Cordialement, ChrisPtDe (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiretaine à Chamalières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Saint-Amable sculpture.JPG

File:Saint-Amable sculpture.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Eglise de Courtesserre.jpg

File:Eglise de Courtesserre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 16:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Gorille et rhino (Cézeaux - Clermont).jpg

File:Gorille et rhino (Cézeaux - Clermont).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Immeuble place Louise Bourgeois.jpg

File:Immeuble place Louise Bourgeois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Martin Pêcheur.jpg

File:Martin Pêcheur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion rationales

Please note:

1. Per COM:CSD#F3, COM:FOP is not a valid reason for speedy deletion, and so for example, photos of modern buildings/artworks in France must go through COM:DR.
2. "Contenu non libre en France" or "Copyvio. Trouvé sur internet." is not an adequate rationale for COM:CSD#F1. You must provide specific evidence in the form of a link to a webpage in which the image has appeared before the Commons upload and in equal or higher resolution. Additionally, note that works are public domain in France if the author has been dead for more than 70 years, so those should not be tagged for deletion.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I will pass by normal Deletion request. --Vida Nova (talk) 16:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Rue des Gras - Cathédrale de Clermont - Clermont-Ferrand.jpg

File:Rue des Gras - Cathédrale de Clermont - Clermont-Ferrand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Suppression de matériel (cartes Espace linguistique limousin)

Je suis sincèrement désolé mais votre carte de l'occitan limousin est fausse et ne correspond pas aux études linguistiques de terrain faites notamment par l'IEO, et autres linguistes indépendants.

Vous avez supprimé les cartes faites par le Collectif Arri!, en partenariat avec l'IEO. Les ouvrages que vous citez (et ça c'est pas mal), valident ces cartes, certainement pas celle que l'on peut en effet voir sur la site catalan de l'Atlas Interactif.

De quel droit ? J'ai cru comprendre que vous êtes un habitué de ce type d'agissement. "Merci" de retirer vos cartes, et remettre les "bonnes".

Ce sera bien aimable à vous. Jiròni B. (talk) 21:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Vos demandes de suppression

Bonjour, Merci de ne pas créer de demandes de suppression sans raison valable. Yann (talk) 16:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)