Bayo

Vaste purge d'abus Ubisoft

Salut bayo, j'ai entamé une vaste purge de tous les abus de {{Attribution-Ubisoft}} en taggant comme Copyvio tous les fichiers récupérés sur le site web d'Ubi. Un admin a décliné mes requêtes, expliquant que je devais d'abord passer par un membre OTRS. En fait, c'est idiot de ma part, j'aurais dû t'en parler dès le début (déjà car en tant qu'admin/OTRS tu aurais pu supprimer directement tous les fichiers que j'aurais vérifiés, mais aussi et surtout parce-que tu es assez concerné par le sujet), mais j'ai été subitement pris d'une frénésie suppressionniste .

Bien entendu, si j'ai eu tord de procéder de la sorte, n'hésites pas à me le dire ! Jean-Frédéric (talk) 23:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hy

I don't know how to update the new version of my a file, I tried to update File:First music notes of the first Tomb Raider videogame.jpg, but it always said to me that the file is already existing. --TudorTulok (talk) 08:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I want to keep File:First music notes of the first Tomb Raider.jpg and I want to delete File:First music notes of the first Tomb Raider videogame.jpg, I changed the image ratio of the original file, is that wrong? --TudorTulok (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for deleting the file. I repeat one incomplete question of mine: I changed the image ratio of the original file, is that wrong for updating the image. I'm using wikipedia commons for some time, I'm not a new user, I'm not sure how many days. --TudorTulok (talk) 10:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Image resolution

When uploading images on Commons from Flickr, should the resolution be the biggest available ("Original") or second-biggest available ("Large")? I wasn't sure because I thought Original looked very huge. But as per Commons:First steps/Quality and description#Images it says to upload the highest resolution available. Deadman (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Bigger is better because here it's the original image. The original image use the full quality available. And both Commons or Mediawiki have no problem to contain or display big images. Then there is no problems. ~ bayo or talk 13:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Deadman (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for the comment! =), but I don't understand (jeje); You want delete the work in svg format or the work in png format?... Salut. --Addicted04 (talk) 03:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

OK... thank you!!. --Addicted04 (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Copyvio

Hi,
Could you have a look at the files uploaded by this user today? They are most probably screenshots uploaded to Flickr with a wrong CC license. I taged some of them with {{Copyvio}} but a few more still remains untagged. It will be faster if an admin would have a look at them and delete directly (If my assessment is true). İyivikiler... ho? ni! 16:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Its not very easy to check. A tag, a deletion request, or a ask to Flickr user, is better IMO. ~ bayo or talk 16:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I would tag the rest, but they are already deleted :) Thanks anyway... İyivikiler... ho? ni! 16:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Logo cop ru.png

Please delete this file: File:Logo cop ru.png. It is an copyrighted logo of a new commercial game in development: “S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat”, not a screenshot. OTRS permission is not valid for this file. --NeD80 (talk) 20:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. ~ bayo or talk 09:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

zlib license

Hello again. How i can correctly select "zlib license" when uploading screenshots of free zlib software such this: File:Irrlicht screenshot01.png? --NeD80 (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I dont think you can. You should select "no license" and add the right thing into the description:

==Licensing==
{{free screenshot|{{Zlib}}}}

It exists too much license to provide everything into the upload screen, IMO. ~ bayo or talk 10:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

If you know a little about this software, do you think the logo is copyrighted? Category:Irrlicht Engine. ~ bayo or talk 11:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

---

I think that logo is free, similar to this logo: File:Odelogo.jpg. I could not find at the official web-cite any statement about copyrighted logo. --NeD80 (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

And I have another problem. I had created in Inkscape that SVG-scheme: File:CryEngine family tree v20.svg. If i view this file in the full-screen mode, it is all-right. But when i view it in a standart mode, all inscriptions are uncorrectly shifted both horizontally and vertically. Similar with this file: File:CryEngine family tree v11.svg Can you help me? --NeD80 (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Category "CryEngine" is not necessary, because all of that three files from category illustrate the similar scheme. Two of them must be deleted. --NeD80 (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, thats a know problem; font are not well rendered. I dont know very well why. 1) You can test to use a "generic" font (courier, serif...), something the server know, and not a special font from your os; 2) you also can convert the font into path, but it break the file, no body can rework the text, and the file will be bigger. 3) then, you can play with font size, and font align to create something readable on wiki (but Inkscape with not display the same thing).

For the category, we often delete nothing, but will see. Categories are created and removed with the time, we also can subcategories some games, or add more files (for example, maybe we can move the text of the logo here http://www.cryengine3.com/). Anyway your last layout is very nice.

~ bayo or talk 13:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks for your answer, just tell me one thing — where is a source of such failure: it is disadvantage of SVG format, or Inkscape program, or web-wiki-engine or Opera browser (which I used)?
• And can those files: File:Ball-socket joint.png‎, File:Slider joint.png and File:Hinge joint.png‎ have both "Linkage (mechanical)" and "Physics engine" categories? --NeD80 (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
• About SVG-scheme — I will try to make a new file with gengeric fonts and then upload here. --NeD80 (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for speaking here without invitation : I checked your SVG file for the fonts. I noticed it uses Arial and Times New Roman, which according to meta:SVG fonts, are not supported. Bitstream Vera Sans is said to be ok. Hoping this was helpful, Jean-Frédéric (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

« where is a source of such failure » any format without embedded font have this problem. For example HTML is in this case too (or maybe a simple Word document too). That why W3C provide some common font name every environment should have. Thanks Jean-Frédéric for this usefull meta page.

For "Linkage (mechanical)", i dont think its a good idea. File:3d rotule.jpg or File:Ball-socket joint.png is the same thing, if we dont use "Physics engine" for the first, we should not use this category for the second. Its not "Physics engine" concepts (i mean its not new, it nothing "Physics engine" only), but mechanical concepts. ~ bayo or talk 00:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

~ bayo or talk 00:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

File:RuneLogo.jpg

Why the license is too much restrictive to Wikimedia Commons??? TheMente (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. The Runescape logo dont use a free license, but, an only comment « These images may be used for review purposes. » It restrict the use according to the use context (« review purposes »). Then we can't use this image every where, and we can't edit it. That why i delete it. For example en.wikipedia dont say this logo is free http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Runescape-Logo.png (anyway, it's not an argument, but it's illustrative). ~ bayo or talk 08:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Uncategorized and cat-a-lot

Hi Bayo, I see you worked on MediaWiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js in the past. Would you be willing to change cat-a-lot to remove {{Uncategorized}} (and variations) when a category is added? This is already implemented in MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js. Multichill (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Maybe we should use HotCat functions into cat-a-lot (function for edition and save can be the same imo). cat-a-lot should only be GUI function to select files. But cat-a-lot look too hard to me. ~ bayo or talk 13:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:MSPR MetaKraken 46.jpg

This image of mine does not contain copyrighted images at all. It is actually a screenshot that was from the PS3's HDD, so I don't see how that counts as a copyrighted image. This is actually my image I took from the PS3 last year, so there's no reason to delete my recent uploaded image. I don't think this image was made by Sony. It was entirely made by me. No one else. JMBZ-12 (talk) 22:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Unfortunatly, like a photo of a drawing, or a sculpture, the photographer only own some right on the photo. Some one create the drawing or the sculpture. Here it's a derivative work from MotorStorm, and the author is Evolution Studios. We need agreement from the owner to release in a free license your screenshot.

But if you come from English wikipedia, you can upload this screenshot into en.wikipedia.org, with the "license" "fair use" ; but on Wikimedia Commons we can't. ~ bayo or talk 13:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Renaming files

Hello again. Another question: wikicommons web-engine allows to rename files? If yes, how i can rename files? --NeD80 (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. At the moment MediaWiki allow to rename a file, but Wikimedia project dont enable it. Maybe some bug or problem. I hope soon we can (but anyway, maybe with admin restriction).

• https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709 (MediaWiki)
• https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15842 (Wikimedia projects)

Renaming a file with hands or with robot is very stupid and hard, and break history... then maybe it is better to wait. ~ bayo or talk 22:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Your IRC request

Do you still require help with this user or should I take this situation as finished until he uploads another copyvio? odder 10:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for your help. Maybe you should explain to him, it's pedagogical, but dont spend too much time. Just something he can understand. If he dont want to understand i am able to block him anyway. ~ bayo or talk 11:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Guild Wars

• File:Zryder Nyte.jpg
• File:Zryder Nyte.jpg
• File:Straight2Top.jpg
• File:Mandragors.jpg
• File:IDS run 1.jpg
• File:Gwicon.png
• File:Gw133.jpg
• File:Gw053.JPG
• File:Gw052.PNG
• File:Gw052.JPG
• File:Gw002.jpg
• File:Gw045.jpg

Cheers! Rama (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

File:HEV suit drawing.png

I don't know what you were trying to do here, but it didn't work. Don't subst {{Delete}} please. Multichill (talk) 18:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Very easy ti fix the problem anyway.... ~ bayo or talk 21:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Hola

Bayo, me puedes ayudar a convertir una imagen de jpg a svg o decirme cómo lo puedo hacer? gracias!Pepedavila (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

You can look at es:Inkscape, but es:Gráfico vectorial is not the same as es:Gráfico rasterizado. Inkscape provide image vectorisation, but the result can't be very nice. ~ bayo or talk 22:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Purge Ubisoft, le retour

Salut bayo,

J'ai pris mon courage à deux mains et fait l'inventaire de tous les screenshots Ubisoft. Après quelques heures de boulot et un plantage de Firefox, voici le résultat :

• Prince of Persia (cf. 22 mai, 29 mai, 7 juillet, 9 octobre)
  • File:PoP2008-Prince_vs_the_Hunter.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Acrobatics_Sliding.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Climbing.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Desert_Area.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Fight_Corruption.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Main_Character_Prince.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Prince-and-Elika.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Prince_Pillar_Jump.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Prince_Taunt.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Prince_helps_Elika.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_Prince_vs_Human_Enemy.jpg
  • File:PoP2008_World_Healthy.jpg
  • File:PoP_Acrobatic_Gameplay.jpg
  • File:PoP_Elika_Powers.jpg
  • File:PoP_Elika_Special_Attack.jpg
  • File:PoP_Elika_special_attack.jpg
  • File:PoP_Prince_Hunter_Battle.jpg
  • File:PoP_Prince_Leap.jpg
  • File:PoP_Prince_and_Elika_running.jpg
  • File:PoP_The_Hunter_Fight.jpg
  • File:PoP_Uncorrupted_environments.jpg
  • File:PopprodigyElika.jpg (croppé)
  • File:PopprodigyPrince.jpg (croppé)
  • File:Prince_(8).JPG
  • File:Prince_climbing.jpg

• Tom Clancy's EndWar (cf. site officiel)
  • File:89094-EW_Screens7.jpg
  • File:89097-EW_Screens8.jpg
  • File:ENDW_Nextgen_Screenshots_Campaign_Paris_battle.jpg

• GRAW
  • File:GRAW2_PC.jpg (Cf. ici)
  • File:GRAW2_X360_El_Paso_Medic_Tankcover14_full.jpg (Cf. ici)
  • File:Scott_Mitchell.jpg (Cf. ici)

• Assassin's Creed (cf. site officiel)
  • File:Assassin's Creed SwordBattle.jpg (cf. ici ; en demande de suppression depuis 3 mois...)
  • File:Assassin's Creed SocialStealth.jpg (cf. ici)

• Rainbow Six Vegas (cf. site officiel)
  • File:Rainbow Six Vegas 1.jpg
  • File:Rainbow Six Vegas 2 3.jpg
  • File:Rainbow Six Vegas 2.jpg
  • File:Rainbow Six Vegas 2 2.jpg
• Far Cry 2 (cf. site officiel
  • File:Far Cry 2 African Setting.jpg
  • File:Far Cry 2 Animals.jpg
  • File:Far Cry 2 explosion.jpg
  • File:Far Cry 2 Setting.jpg (cf. 5 mai)
• The Settlers: Rise of an Empire
  • File:Settlers6_screen_01.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_02.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_03.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_04.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_05.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_06.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_07.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_08.jpg (ici)
  • File:Settlers6_screen_09.jpg (ici)

• Je suis également assez sceptique concernant la vidéo File:Assassin's Creed - Leap of Faith.ogg.

Et voilà ! Tu comptes supprimer le tout direct, ou passer par une Deletion Request ?

Jean-Frédéric (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

File a regular deletion request please. Multichill (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Already 2 deletion request for that without any problem, then, it is not need. ~ bayo or talk 21:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Better: Don't delete these images at all. We got OTRS permission from Ubisoft, i just read it. Multichill (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

We know it. Only allow user screenshots, not Ubisoft media files or any other sources: screenshot from Gamekult also need Gamekult agreement... ~ bayo or talk 21:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Just to be clear : those are only ubisoft press material. Most of the time I pointed to the official site ; but even for the few others they are not screenshots made by journalists, but press material handed by Ubisoft way before the game was even released. I can't possibly see as it may be considered a screenshot (if you have a look at the files, most of them are cleary hi-res).

A lot of other Ubisoft files here on Commons are screenshots made by journalists (IGN or so). They are not tagged nor listed here. As far as I know, their legal status has not been discussed yet. I may file a proper deletion request in time.

As a reminder : Commons:Deletion requests/File:El Guerrero.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PoP2008 Environment Bright.jpg and Commons talk:Licensing/Archive 17#Ubisoft.

Jean-Frédéric (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

So, what shall we do then ? Jean-Fred (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

A delete everything with "Ubisoft press materials". I dont find File:Far Cry 2 explosion.jpg and the video. ~ bayo or talk 21:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. One thing off our todo-list.

File:Far Cry 2 explosion.jpg is located on the official site : select screenshots, scroll down once, it should be the on the bottom left corner (named FC2_MEDIA_SCR_13_EXPOLOSION)

As for the video, I was wondering if it could fall under Ubi agreement : it is not only a succession of screenshots, as there is also the music and sound effects. Jean-Fred (talk) 22:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Maybe we should open a deletion request for it. ~ bayo or talk 20:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Assassin's Creed - Leap of Faith.ogg. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Besoin d'un renseignement OTRS

Coucou bayo, pourrais-tu me briefer rapidement sur l'autorisation pour les screenshoits de Category:Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45 ? Je viens de la remarquer, et j'aimerais bien en savoir un peu plus... Jean-Fred (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

De mémoire, la boite a autorisé l'utilisation de ce set d'image. Je regarderais dans la semaine. ~ bayo or talk 21:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:Flag of Jacksonville, Florida.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of Jacksonville, Florida.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Svgalbertian (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Upload/screenshot/bg: "Russian" label link to "Bulgarian" web-page

Hello. When I uploading file and use next path: Upload file -> It is a free software screenshot, I go to the page Commons:Upload/screenshot. In the head of this page there is menu which I can select desired language. So, if I select "Russian", I'll see it: Commons:Upload/screenshot/bg. It is definitely not russian. More then that, in the page name we see Commons:Upload/screenshot/bg - which means Bulgarian, not Russian. But here: Commons:Upload/screenshot I see link to bulgarian with label "russian". Fix it, please. --NeD80 (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I do it for you, but the page is not protected. You can edit it.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload/screenshot/lang

But there is no Russian translation for this page. ~ bayo or talk 18:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Can I make russian translation by myself? And then put it here:Commons:Upload/screenshot/ru? --NeD80 (talk) 08:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Sure you can. You should copy-paste Commons:Upload/screenshot, everything will be ok. ~ bayo or talk 10:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Done: Commons:Upload/screenshot/ru. --NeD80 (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Crysis 2 Screen.jpg

New problem :) This file File:Crysis 2 Screen.jpg is not suitable for WikiCommons, because this screenshot is not free and never was free. w:Crysis, w:Crysis Warhead and w:Crysis 2 — all this games were developed by w:Crytek and published by w:Electronic Arts. So w:Ubisoft have no any relation to the Crytek, EA and Crysis franchise. More than that, this screenshot is fake, very famous and old fake (see here and here). --NeD80 (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

done. ~ bayo or talk 18:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Star Ocean

We have the authorization of Ubisoft: User:Avatar/Ubisoft. There is no problem with uploading images of Ubisoft-published games. The original discussion which lead to the creation of Template:Attribution-Ubisoft was here: User talk:Avatar/Ubisoft/OTRS thread, and it was a discussion about "Lock On: Modern Air Combat" in particular, a game developed by Eagle Dynamics and published by Ubisoft. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 10:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, here is my reasoning:

• Lock On: Modern Air Combat was developed by Eagle Dynamics, published by 1C Company in Russia and published by Ubisoft in the UK.
• Star Ocean: Till the End of Time was developed by tri-Ace, published by Square Enix in Japan and published by Ubisoft in the UK.
• Template:Attribution-Ubisoft applies to Lock On: Modern Air Combat. Therefore, it applies to Star Ocean: Till the End of Time too.

It's true that Ubisoft doesn't own all versions of these games, but it does own the UK versions (since they gave us the permission to upload screenshots of Lock On, instead of saying "Oh we don't know, please ask 1C Company not us"). We can therefore upload screenshots of these games as long as these screenshots are from the versions published by Ubisoft. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know : I had the same concerns when I noticed the Star Ocean screenshots, so I asked for some input at Commons talk:Licensing#Ubisoft agreement (well, no answer so far). Jean-Fred (talk) 12:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Help

I saw you are familiar with the cat-a-lot funcion. Can you please read this and this and try to help? Thanks-a-lot :) --Sailko (talk) 08:11, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I am sorry, i am very busy then i have no time to help here. ~ bayo or talk 20:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Bayo. You have new messages at Abigor's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Video games categories

Thanks for this, and "by alphabet" category info Shooke ^{(Talk me in spanish, english or italian)} 19:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Festival du jeu vidéo

Salut Bayo,

Sincèrement, j'aurai aimé y aller (surtout que j'ai désormais du bien meilleur matos), mais suite à ma perte d'emploi et à plusieurs mois de loyers impayés, j'ai malheureusement du quitter Paris pour retourner vivre (provisoirement) chez maman à Aix-en-Provence. Et là, tout de suite, il y a nettement moins d'événements intéressants :(

J'essaierai d'y retourner l'année prochaine, mais c'est étonnant que malgré leur affluence record, il n'y ai pas eu plus de photographes concernés par le libre. Okki (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

File:UFO Alien Invasion 0.12 - baseview.jpg

File:UFO Alien Invasion 0.12 - baseview.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Jappalang (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

File:UFO Alien Invasion 0.12 - geoscape.jpg

File:UFO Alien Invasion 0.12 - geoscape.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Jappalang (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

File:UFO Alien Invasion 0.12 - mart.jpg

File:UFO Alien Invasion 0.12 - mart.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Jappalang (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: UFO: AI

Hi, it would be helpful to everyone if sources for this game's license are given. This would reduce confusion, preventing any copyright violation tagging. As it is, no link is given to help others verify the license, especially when the game's website states the contents are copyrighted. Jappalang (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I am sorry, i c'ant do anything because i dont know about the subject, but imho the redirection is not bad. ~ bayo or talk 19:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Removeu a imagem logotipo

POR FAVOR! poderia explicar o motivo de ter retirado a imagem logotipo do jogo Tatsunoko vs. Capcom. Senão for muito INCOMODO!!.

Category talk:MediaWiki edit toolbar

Your input is wanted. Thanks. Rocket000 (talk) 01:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Référencement des moteurs idTech2-3

Salut. C'est vrai que j'avais complètement zappé ce projet de l'année dernier (suite à perte de bookmarks :S). En tout cas, j'ai a peu près finalisé le contenu de File:Quake - family tree 2.svg (enfin, ceux dont j'ai pu retrouver la trace) ; il reste encore quelques chevauchements mais je pense qu'on peut les éliminer en supprimant quelques titres commerciaux. Qu'en dis-tu ? Romainhk (talk) 17:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Peut-être qu'au final, ce serait plus lisible de ne garder que la filiation des moteurs et de retirer les jeux. J'aime bien les gros schéma, mais dans un article je le sens pas bien, en tous cas se n'est pas exploitable pour le commun des mortels :-) ~ bayo or talk 12:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

J'ai retiré tous les jeux dérivés (il ne reste que les titres officiels) et quelques moteurs annexes mineurs : ça commence à devenir lisible :). Romainhk (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Je voulais dire, faire carrément un nouveau document et adapter selon ou on souhaite le mettre, et ce qu'on veut lui faire dire. Par exemple si c'est pour un résumé de l'id Tech, déjà seulement les moteurs ca fait beaucoup ; si c'est pour une page précise, autant élaguer les moteurs anciens et récents et laisser les jeux. Enfin, je dis ça comme ça, c'est toi qui vois. ~ bayo or talk 13:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Voila une version épurée centrée sur les moteurs id et les principaux dérivés : File:Quake - family tree 2 Simplified.svg. Romainhk (talk) 13:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Je trouve ca vraiment bien. ~ bayo or talk 19:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Arg ya un petit bug graphique entre WinQuake, Hexen II engine and Quake engine. ~ bayo or talk 19:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Bien vu! J'ai repassé le tout en mode dot, plus adapté au graphe orientés ; bien que l'aspect stratifié donne une fausse idée de "génération", il n'y a pus de colisions. Romainhk (talk) 08:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Online games

Category discussion notification

Category:Online games has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--ŠJů (talk) 07:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Gallipoli

It's GPL-licensed The image can also be found there. It isn't used anywhere, so it can be deleted. --Joancreus ^(talk)_{(talk (ca))} 16:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Some of categories "by alphabet"

Category discussion notification

Some of categories "by alphabet" has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--ŠJů (talk) 08:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Permissions

Hi there, I had just sent in 2 emails (kimhs@live.com) regarding photo permissions on my uploaded photos. Can you please take a look Bayo? Thank you, most obliged. Atomsgiven (talk) 20:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello. If you send the mail in english i think an english talker will review it soon. English it not my natural language then it is not very easy to me to review permissions. ~ bayo or talk 22:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

File:France Haut-Koenigsbourg aerial view.jpg

Bonjour. Je viens de retirer la permission OTRS de cette image. La photo étant personnelle, il n'est pas nécessaire d'envoyer une autorisation, par contre il est peut-être bon de clarifier la relation Wrtalya/Pethrus. Cordialement. ~ bayo or talk 19:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Wrtalya est simplement une connaissance qui ne maitrise pas Common, et c'est pour cela que j'ai téléversé sa photographie. Je pensais que le systeme d'OTRS s'appliquait plutot bien ici ? --Pethrus (talk) 02:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Heelo. Pour info, en bas de page User talk:Pethrus. Corrige moi si je me trompe. Merci. ~ bayo or talk 20:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Salut,

J'ai précisé un peu, mais ton message était tout à fait exact. Merci de t'en être occupé !--Bapti ✉ 12:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Ubisoft

Can you please explain what was the reasons for speedy deletion of files marked with permission from Ubisoft. As you are aware there is ongoing discussion about this permission and clearly no consensus over it. Speedy deletion should be performed over clear cases, and this one is obviously not clear one. At least they should have do through normal DR, but as for me all images are absolutely fine as long as permission template is not deleted. --Justass (talk) 23:09, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

I delete many images from an auto transfer from en->commons, because without a fast action, somebody/something will start to delete images on Wikipedia-en.

Anyway agreement or not, "en" can use this images with the "fair use", but if we transfer it on Commons, i think we will delete them all. And it will be harder to move them again into "en". Then, while the DR is not close, i really dont think we should transfer any image from a wiki to Commons. It is less painfull to wait the end of the DR.

• Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Attribution-Ubisoft 3

You can see my action like a revert of transfer, not like a deletion. ~ bayo or talk 12:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:Autorisations de réutilisation du fichier Image:VCO Map Level1.jpg

Bonjour,

En se qui concerne les image pour Voyage Century Online (VCO), j'ai abandonné la rédaction du livre sur wikibooks pour plusieurs raisons. La première est parce que le jeu est beaucoup moins populaire et la deuxième est que j'ai transféré le contenue du livre sur Strategywiki. Je comprends pourquoi je devrais vous offrir des documents qui vous montre que la compagnie me permet d'utiliser leurs images. Cependant du au raison mentionné plus haut et car la compagnie est difficile à contacter, je ne pourrai vous fournir plus d'information.

Alors pour résumer le tout, vous pouvez supprimer les images qui ont un lien avec Voyage Century Online (je crois qu'ils commencent tous par "VCO_").

Merci à vous et bonne journée

DJ K-Jtan (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Merci. ~ bayo or talk 20:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Il n'y a pas de problème, vous faites du bon travail. DJ K-Jtan (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Satoshi Tajiri.jpg

I don't understand your reasoning, that the source of the image does not have the source. It has the same format as here. The copyright holder uses a pseudonym, and released the image into the public domain. There does not have to be another source. If the author posted it there first, and released it into the public domain, what in the world is wrong with that? Scapler (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh. I see what you are saying. I'll see what you are saying, I'll seek clarification on it. Scapler (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Clubber Lang.jpg

J'ai vu que tu avais supprimé cette image, je ne comprends pas je croyais qu'elle était libre. Qu'est-ce qui a changé? --Guil2027 (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour. En fait j'ai supprimé 90% des images Ubisoft. Cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Attribution-Ubisoft 3. L'accord est nul, Ubisoft France vient clairement d'indiquer que rien de la sorte n'avait été signé. Je peux toujours te transmettre les images, mais on ne pourra pas s'en servir dans la Wikipedia francophone. ~ bayo or talk 18:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah d'accord, merci. --Guil2027 (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

File:PongVideoGameCabinet.jpg

File:PongVideoGameCabinet.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Yanguas (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for this nice LOL. ~ bayo or talk 19:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Mario_tennis_balls.jpg and Nintendo_Yoshi.jpg

Hi, you deleted the images i'd imported from flickr. They were both CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. So i don't see a copyright violation, so a deletion was not nessecary. Why were they removed? bye bye --Gkittlaus (talk) 11:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC) EDIT: On File:Supermario_Kungsbacka.jpg you can see Super Mario, but it's not a violation of copyright. So I really don't get the point why my files are a violation. --Gkittlaus (talk) 11:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

I chime in: the reasoning is explained on {{Flickrvionote}}. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok i understand, but those pictures were only photos of an action-figure and a can of tennisballs. They can be seen in every super-market. Why is a photo of that a violation and a photo of that File:Supermario Kungsbacka.jpg not? --Gkittlaus (talk) 11:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

The subject of of your 2 images is the character it self. The character design is copyrighted by the owner, Nintendo. And Nintendo will not agree to allow everything with it. For File:Supermario Kungsbacka.jpg i dont know, you can open a DR ({{Delete}}). ~ bayo or talk 12:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

And what about File:Wario.png and so on? I don't think that photos of copyrighted characters are a violation. For example I visit Disney World and make a photo with Mickey. So i would not be allowed to upload that picture just because Mickey Mouse is on it? --Gkittlaus (talk) 13:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

This template is already in DR. Check Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-US-patent-no notice. Sorry, but we dont care about what people think, are you lawyer? I dont think you can upload image with Disney character, because it contain elements you don't own rights. We already delete thousand of Yoshi, Mario, Kurby, Ryu-Ken, Sonic, Megaman, and so on, every time somebody upload something like that. That's not a personal choice. ~ bayo or talk 15:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

No don't worry, I don't take it personal. I was just wondering about the deletion and try to understand why it was deleted to avoid further mistakes of mine ;) --Gkittlaus (talk) 09:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the catch on Alien Arena

Thanks. I didn't pay too much attention to the licenses, I was just categorizing uncategorized media. Take care! (Sorry, fr-0)

TFCforever (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Sppedy del Newpages CVG

There was a speedy del for your page newpages CVG, which I reverted. [1] .--Kungfuman (talk) 17:14, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

o_O ~ bayo or talk

Copyrighted screenshots was deleted and restored

Hi, Bayo! It's been a long time i've suspended my activity in Wikicommons, but there is one problem, that invoked my awaking :) There are three files: File:QSPLogo.png, File:QSP shot1.png, File:QSP shot2.png. They relate to russian-made proprietary software, absolutely unnotable text-based game engine. Few days ago I've nominated all that files on speed deletion, they was deleted, but after that Hzdbyte, the original uploader of those files, uploaded them again with the same names and descriptions. Furthermore, screenshots File:QSP shot1.png and File:QSP shot2.png was made in Vista/Seven interface, which can be seen at the top of screens. Proprietary interface is also forbidden in Wikicommons. By the way, in ruwiki the same user Hzdbyte created article w:ru:QSP, which was nominated to deletion as spam, advert and unnotable. This user is absolutely uncommunicable, hi does not participates in discussions and simply delete "To deletion" templates. So there is no reason to deal with him.

So, what I want from you. Please, delete those 3 files and block those names from new uploading, I know, you can do this :) But there is a big possibility, that Hzdbyte will upload the same screenshots with the new names, so in this case I'll contact you later again.

Thanks. --NeD80 (talk) 12:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi. The rusian article is deleted, then i delete the images again. But sure Commons can contain non notable content, and i dont think Vista interface is a real problem (i dont rememeber the exacte policy). Anyway there is a license problem. Thanks to show me this problem. ~ bayo or talk 18:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

createur de jeux japonais pris en photo au MiG

Je les ai rangés la Category:Festival_Montpellier_In_Game_2010 Esby (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Merci :-) ~ bayo or talk 16:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Unfree proprietary logos

Hi again! File:IceKings logo.jpg and File:Bananawars logo.jpg - both are proprietary logotypes of unfree proprietary commercial games with, of course, absolute zero-notability. --NeD80 (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Use {{subst:npd}}. A robot will delete it soon. ~ bayo or talk 15:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Problème avec une image

Salut Bayo !

Il y a un problème avec cette image . La source indiquée est le site de la CIA, ce qui est vrai mais elle est identique à l'originale de Commons . D'autant plus le contributeur qui l'a importée met la pagaille sur tous les wiki pour remplacer l'image originale par la sienne qui est de moins bonne qualité. Que faire ?

Cordialement, Juraastro (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC).

Bonjour. J'ai créé une redirection mais pour ce qui est de l'image elle même File:Ly-map.png, ba la faut comprendre ce qu'il veut. Ya pas grand chose à faire. Je ne sais pas s'il y a des pages pour discuter de confits sur Commons. Ca doit exister, le mieux c'est de laisser un mot sur le bistro. ~ bayo or talk 18:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Atelier photo, le Retour

Bonjour,

l'atelier photo qui avait lieu ce week-end s'est suffisemment bien passé pour que l'on envisage d'en organiser d'autres éditions. Comme tu avais exprimé de l'intérêt sans pouvoir venir, je me permets de t'écrire en priorité pour te demander s'il y a des lieux ou des dates qui t'arrangeraient ou te sembleraient pertinents. Si tu as des idées, tu peux les soumettre sur User talk:Rama/atelier photo 2.

Merci et peut-être à un de ces jours ! Rama (talk) 09:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey, super :D Si je viens c'est certainement en touriste... mais c'est bon a savoir. ~ bayo or talk 12:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

SimCity SNEX9x.png

• File:SimCity SNEX9x.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This file was not a copyright violation; the source code has been released under GNU: see w:SimCity. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Micropolis is free, and do not contain any "SimCity" occurencies.

No trademark or publicity rights are granted. This license does NOT give you any right, title or interest in the trademark SimCity or any other Electronic Arts trademark. You may not distribute any modification of this program using the trademark SimCity or claim any affliation or association with Electronic Arts Inc. or its employees.

http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Micropolis#License

The license is very explicit, you can upload here content about Micropolis, i dont think you can do the same for SImCIty. ~ bayo or talk 21:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I think that license says I can upload it if it's modified to not have the SimCity or EA trademark located on the image. If you prefer, I can also speak (passably) in Spanish. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Anyway, the opensource released code come from SimCity for X11, not from SNES. Then please, if you want more screenshots, take a screenshot from Micropolis. ~ bayo or talk 07:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Lands_of_hope_flyer*.jpg

I created an Undeletion Request for the file. I had gotten the copyright released. Don't you think you should at least ask, or notify someone when you delete a file that is in use? Enlormn (talk) 23:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

No, i dont think. Especially for a non informative content like that. I dont think advertising in articles is useful. ~ bayo or talk 08:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Icon_no_permission.svg

File:Icon_no_permission.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Soccer illustrated (talk) 06:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

hmmm... ~ bayo or talk 18:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Donkey_Kong_arcade_-_zapwizard_34102189.jpg

File:Donkey_Kong_arcade_-_zapwizard_34102189.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

sугсго 10:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Bayo. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2011 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you a×p_de^Hello! 16:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Bayo/Newpages CVG Commons

Your useful "User:Bayo/Newpages_CVG_Commons" is no more updated. The robot is mulfunctiuoning or you plan to forget/remove it? Thank you

Commons:Deletion requests/TA-derived screenshots

Hello, two screenshots were uploaded by you.--131.159.77.237 13:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Tennis for Two.jpg

File:Tennis for Two.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Tennis for Two - Screen.png

File:Tennis for Two - Screen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:ESWC 2006 Final - Paris Bercy - scene duel.jpg

File:ESWC 2006 Final - Paris Bercy - scene duel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 20:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Computer hardware

Dear Bayo, since your created one of the categories mentioned at Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/03/Category:Computer brands, I would like to read your opion about it there. Thanks in advance, --Flominator (talk) 13:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Creative_Commons_icons

Creative Commons icons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Elvey (talk) 01:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Beneath a Steel Sky - 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Beneath a Steel Sky - 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hm ? Image does have a license. Please open a Deletion Request to discuss that if you wish. Jean-Fred (talk) 08:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

File:SNK Corporation of America Data.jpg

Hi, you dleted this used in fr.wiki ? What the problem with this image ? How can i bring it back ?

Best regards--Archimëa (talk) 22:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Je viensde m'appercevoir que tu es bayo du wikipédia français. Cette image est utilisée en source, elle est bien utilisée. car ce moteur de recherche n'est pas liable, en tout cas impossible de faire un lien les résultats d'un moteur de recherche, et c'est pour présenter ces résultats que j'ai mis cette photo. http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/cbs.aspx

Elle ser tde référence pour l'article SNK en français.

Je retélécharge donc cette photo.

Merci d'avance--Archimëa (talk) 22:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:File_icons

File icons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- Perhelion 20:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Guarico State.svg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Guarico State.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Flag of Guarico State.svg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Video_game_screenshots

Video game screenshots has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fangusu (talk) 03:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Battle for Wesnoth 0.6 - fr title.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 22:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:P_icons

P icons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 08:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Beneath a Steel Sky - 3.jpg

And also:

• File:Beneath a Steel Sky - hunting kangaroos.jpg
• File:Beneath a Steel Sky.png

Yours sincerely, czar 04:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Penny_Arcade

Penny Arcade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

IagoQnsi (talk) 15:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Romero 3designers.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Romero 3designers.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Romero 3designers.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Messier object 005.jpg

And also:

• File:Messier object 011.jpg
• File:Messier object 015.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tremulous - Marauder and B-suit doing battle.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tremulous - Marauder and B-suit doing battle.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tremulous - Marauder and B-suit doing battle.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Stryn (talk) 16:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Tremulous - Marauder and B-suit doing battle.jpg

File:Tremulous - Marauder and B-suit doing battle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 18:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(Re: Battle for Wesnoth title screen) 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 18:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Software_by_domain

Software by domain has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

User:Bayo

User:Bayo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:4898:80E8:9:54E0:CD9:2D8F:3F94 05:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

File:John Romero 2004.jpg

File:John Romero 2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tom Hall.jpg

And also:

• File:WarrenSpector.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Paris - Orgues de Flandre.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 13:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Computer_programming

Computer programming has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

156.206.59.230 12:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

File:La Gorgue1.JPG

File:La Gorgue1.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed. Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Jonteemil.

And also:

• File:Miley Bashes the Micron.jpg ( Nominator : Jonteemil | Reason : )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 01:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Froggy Software Grenouille.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Froggy Software Grenouille.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Froggy Software Grenouille.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)