User talk:BokicaK/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by A1Cafel in topic Template:Autotranslate
Archive 1 Archive 2

Image:Kosovo map-en.svg

Hello,
I have no opinion about the Kosovo's independence or not, and I understand the Serbians people point of view , so I have removed the Kosovo borders. You can reconsider your vote if you want.
And, as I said, if someone give to me the Serbian & cyrillic translations, I will be able to draw this map for the WP-sr.
Sémhur 09:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:TheKosovoMaiden.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:TheKosovoMaiden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Botev 18:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Slobodan Bajic dormitory.JPG

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 11:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:LET L-13 Blanik JBexiga.jpeg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Hi BokicaK - you transwikied this image from EN, but brought some licencing problems with it. Specifically, there's no evidence that the photographer (who was not the uploader) has released the image under a free licence; furthermore, the source information provided is so vague that we can't even verify it ourselves. I think we'll need to lose this image, but it's not though any fault of yours - the original uploader to EN should have been more careful. Cheers! Rlandmann (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Masterpiece Matrix.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Masterpiece Matrix.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--BrokenSphere 20:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

BokicaK, do not transfer Fair-use-images from :en to Commons. They are not allowed here and will always be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't tagged as FU at time when I uploaded it. --BokicaK (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Мапе

Не знам што ти не одговарају, а ја једноставно немам времена :( Nikola (talk) 17:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Images from frieds

Hi BokicaK,
you have uploaded quite some images not taken by yourself but by friends (Image:Lena Bogdanovic.jpg, Image:Marko Keselj.jpg, Image:Elmedin Kikanovic.jpg, Image:Andre Owens by Zoran Borovac.jpg, Image:Svetislav Pesic by Zoran Borovac.jpg, Image:Vladimir Stimac.jpg, Image:Zarko Paspalj.JPG, Image:VladeDjurovic.jpg, Image:Odbojkasi Srbije.jpg, Image:Interior of SPENS.jpg). Even friends my change their opinion about allowing you to upload their work under a free license. Therefore, we need for every image uploaded but not taken by yourself a written permission by the photographer. If your friends know english or any of the languages provided on Commons:Email templates, you should take the boxed permission template, fill in the image URL on Commons, add a fitting license, send it to the photographers and ask them to mail it back (after adding name and date) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Otherwise you will have to translate the text. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stjepan_Filipović.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


 
Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that the page doesn't have enough information about the source of the image and/or doesn't have information about the license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have put back the warning(s). You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

my answer BokicaK (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, BokicaK!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't know what was the problem. The picture was put in category Bovan Lake. --BokicaK (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:BeliDvor1.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

The image was tagged and properly uploaded. [1] --BokicaK (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Plakati_podrske.jpg

 
File:Plakati_podrske.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

ALE! ¿…? 14:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pelagicevo coat of arms

File:Pelagicevo - coat of arms.svg

Hi, I made the image, see the thumbnail. Is it correct? is there anything you'd like to change? please tell me on the graphics lab page or on my discussion page. Richardprins (talk) 17:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Stadion_Hajduka_1.JPG

 
File:Stadion_Hajduka_1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Odbojkasi_Srbije.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Odbojkasi_Srbije.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Interior_of_SPENS.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Interior_of_SPENS.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Laza_Kostic.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Laza_Kostic.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Gypsy escortDN-ST-91-05966.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gypsy escortDN-ST-91-05966.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gypsy escortDN-ST-91-05966.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Tabercil (talk) 12:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


Category:Mosques in Belgrade

 
Category:Mosques in Belgrade has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Tadija (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Wappen torshavn.png

 
File:Wappen torshavn.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jutta234 (talk) 07:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Погрешан назив слике

Слика (фајл)под називом Saint Uros` Cathedral in Uroševac (File:St Uros Cathedral.jpg, која се налази на енглеској википедији, у ствари је црква Свете Тројице у Партешу (село на путу Урошевац-Гњилане). Исправио сам дескрипцију фајла на en.wikipedia али сада трба ажурирати све везе. Имам више слика цркве Св. Цара Уроша и спреман сам да их ставим на располагање. Имам у плану сређивање и проширење чланка Урошевац, али још нисам савладао технику рада са сликама - на вики сам тек око месец дана! Да ли да нешто предузмем сада? --Mzoran (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

St Uros Cathedral.jpg

Опет ја! Моја интервенција би могла да направи збрку - требало је да се консултујем пре корекције. Постало ми је јасно да је назив фајла остао исти (погрешан), слика не одговара називу, а једино је опис слике тачан! Треба заменити и слику, наравно. Молио бих те да ово средиш да ме енглези, недајбоже, не прогласе вандалом. Како да пошаљем слике цркве? На оставу, вероватно - порадићу на томе. Поздрав.--Mzoran (talk) 12:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

sr.wiki

Hi. I dug out original description. You can read it on Administrator noticeboard. Cheers. -- Bojan  Talk  20:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks (a link would have help, but OK I probably can find it myself, in less than one hour). --GaAs11671 20:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Слике

Имам једну овакву замисао: да се са ср вики пребаце слике јужне Србије, посебно већих места као што су Ниш, Лесковац, Врање, Пирот, Прокупље, Алексинац. Па ме занима слике са којом лиценцом могу да пребацујем. Да ли бих могао да пребацујем слике пуштене у јавно власништво? Ако да, слике са којом још лиценцом бих могао да пребацујем? --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kako da kreiram TUSC nalog? --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 13:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Lena Bogdanovic.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lena Bogdanovic.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Infrogmation (talk) 19:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Lutetia_closest_approach_(Rosetta).jpg

 
File:Lutetia_closest_approach_(Rosetta).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:RusSu-25.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:RusSu-25.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:RusSu-25.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 08:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Brankovina

Gde ja okom, tu ti skokom!
Thanks for Brankovina! Lepo je znati da ti neko normalan pomaže.
Hvala! :)))) --WhiteWriter speaks 13:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Потпис

Потребна ми је помоћ око једне слике. Наиме, тражио сам слику која би престављала потпис Анте Трумбића, но нисам је нашао. Зато сам покушао да такву направим користећи овај докуменат за извлачење потписа по узору на ову. Но при њеној изради нисам успео да уклоним позадину тј. да убацим транспарент. Да ли би могао да ми кажеш у ком се ти програму убацује? --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Philosopher

Hi, file resised. PawełMM (talk) 10:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Xerxes_I,_the_Great,_King_of_Persia.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Xerxes_I,_the_Great,_King_of_Persia.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Xerxes_I,_the_Great,_King_of_Persia.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Fut.Perf. 06:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for adding that info to the Xerxes image, but I'm afraid it doesn't solve the problem. What we need is information that proves it's actually old enough to be PD. I appreciate this is quite likely (my guess is it's second half of 19th century, judging from the style and the engraving technique), but there's no way of knowing; it could quite well also be 20th. Note that the Corbis page you linked to is actually claiming copyright for it. Fut.Perf. 07:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Tarbes_eq_foch.jpg

 
File:Tarbes_eq_foch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frédéric (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pozdrav

Možeš li sa botom da prebaciš ove slike sa en viki na ostavu:

Ove stare slike mogu ići u kategoriju "History of Zrenjanin", dok ovedruge mogu u "Buildings in Zrenjanin", "Bridges in Zrenjanin", itd. Korisnik Alexzr88 je na en vikipediju ubacio stvarno dobre stare slike Zrenjanina i šteta je da ne budu na ostavi da bi se mogle koristiti i na sr vikipediji. 195.178.62.134 19:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hm, neke slike su na klizavoj teritoriji. Necu moci sve prebaciti. -- Bojan  Talk  11:10, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Šta to znači na klizavoj teritoriji? Ne valjaju im licence? 195.178.62.134 14:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Da. Bojim se da je stavio PD-USA koje vazi za slike objavljene pre 1923. a slike je iz 1930ih. -- Bojan  Talk  16:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Dobro, ali ima i slika starijih od 1923 a i onih koje je korisnik sam slikao. Bar te se mogu prebaciti. 195.178.62.134 13:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mapa Londonski ugovor

Jedno pitanje u vezi ove mape - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Londonski_ugovor-lat.svg Da li je moguće napraviti na mapi belu pozadinu umesto providne jer ako se mapa snimi u računar u PNG formatu pozadina bude potpuno crna i slova sa originalno providne pozadine se uopšte ne vide. 123iti (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Kemal_Monteno.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kemal_Monteno.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please give images good descriptions

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Miloš Teodosić (1).jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!
High Contrast (talk) 09:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Graphic Lab request

You request has been completed and can be seen in the archive HERE Fry1989 (talk) 22:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I didn't create it. It would be beyond my abilities. Another user created teh vector file, but it appears he forgot to notify you and mark your request as resolved, so I did that for him. I know what it's like to have a request sitting around for a while, so I thought you'd be happy to see yours completed. Enjoy :) Fry1989 (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Antonija Nadj.jpg

 
File:Antonija Nadj.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Amada44  talk to me 14:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Map of fertile cresent-sr.svg

Explanation at COM:GL/M. --Robot8A (talk) 07:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Drenasi 00.jpg

 
File:Drenasi 00.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WhiteWriter speaks 17:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Zbrka sa brojevima

Zdravo Bokice! Vidim da nisi admin na ovom projektu, ali kao admin na sr. vikipediji, pretpostavljam da znaš za neke alatke kojima se na brži način može ispraviti gomila besmislica koju je učinio jedan IP korisnik. Tiče se srpskih vladara. U istorijskoj literaturi je uvriježeno da se Nemanjići koji su nosili ime "Stefan Uroš" numerišu, pa tako imamo Stefan Uroš I, Stefan Uroš II Milutin, Stefan Uroš III Dečanski, itd. Nemanjići koji su nosili samo ime/titulu "Stefan" se ne numerišu, već se iza "Stefan" doda drugo ime/nadimak: Stefan Nemanja, Stefan Prvovenčani, Stefan Radoslav, Stefan Vladislav, Stefan Dragutin. IP 2.80.105.30 i IP 2.80.116.116, očigledno isti korisnik, preimenovao je kategorije:

Kategorije sa ispravnim imenima su pretvorene u preusmjerenja i ispražnjene, a njihovi fajlovi prenijeti u kategorije sa pogrešnim imenima. Isti korisnik je napravio kategorije:

Prvu treba preimenovati u Category:Stefan Branković, a drugu u Category:Lazar Branković. Pozdrav, VVVladimir (talk) 14:11, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

SVG slike

Pozdrav. Kako je? Hteo sam da te pitam da li bi mogao da napraviš dve svg slike? Ja umem da radim u Fotošopu, ali uopšte ne znam da koristim softvere koji rade sa SVG slikama, pa pošto vidim da si ti vešt sa svg slikama, da li bi mogao da napraviš svg slike sa grbom i zastavom vojvodine iz 1848? Ovo bi trebalo da bude pouzdan izvor - Muzej Grada Pančeva: [2], [3] (to je zastava Vojvodine). A ovo bi bili izvori za grb: [4], [5], [6]. Znači, da li postoji mogućnost da neki svg softver na osnovu tih slika napravi nove svg slike koje bi bile slobodne za upotrebu na Vikipediji? PANONIAN (talk) 19:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Eh, ne znam ni sam šta piše ispod orla. :) Ali nema veze, možda nađem tu zastavu i grb na drugom mestu. Šta misliš da li bi slike sa tih sajtova mogle da se koriste na Vikipediji? Ja umem da koristim samo licence PD-self i PD-old, ali možda ove slike spadaju pod neku drugu slobodnu licencu. Da li se ti razumeš u licensiranje slika malo bolje od mene? Što se tiče daljeg rada na člancima o delovima NS na sr Viki, to mi je odavno u planu, ali nikako da nađem vremena za tako nešto. Iskreno, mnogo vremena gubim nastavljajući se sa ovim vranama, pa ne stižem da uradim mnoge korisne stvari. Stvarno ne razumem ljude koji misle da Vikipedija služi za takvo podjebavanje. PANONIAN (talk) 17:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hm, pa ako misliš da bi zastava i grb Vojvodine iz 1848 mogli da se ubace pod nekom licencom, možda ih ti možeš ubaciti na ostavu sa tom licencom? Ja se stvarno ne razumem u licence koje nisu PD-self i PD-old. PANONIAN (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Serbs022.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

{{SUBST:Colour|#C6363C|Kac}}{{SUBST:Colour|#0C4076|nep}}{{SUBST:Colour|##DCDCDC|cku}} 12:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Problem

Pozdrav. Zanima me da li znaš kako mogu da rešim problem sa ovom slikom: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kalmykia03.png Poslednji thumbnail ne pokazuje novu verziju slike, već staru iz 2006, a isto je i u člancima koji koriste tu sliku: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalmykia#History Da li slučajno znaš kako mogu to da popravim? PANONIAN (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

e zaboravi ovo, problem se nekako rešio. PANONIAN (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ipak mi treba pomoć, isti problem imam kod ova dva fajla:

Znaš li kako da se poslednji thumbnail osveži na najnoviju veriju? Ili možda znaš koga mogu pitati za pomoć? PANONIAN (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Eh, pa poslednja verzija fajla se ne prikazuje ni u svim člancima. Ali OK, pitaću nekog drugog šta da uradim. PANONIAN (talk) 05:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

E rešio sam problem, a rešenje je krajnje jednostavno:

(čisto da znaš ako tebi zatreba to nekad)

to sam našao ovde: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Purge A zamisli, pitao sam neke ljude na Commons-u kako to da uradim i niko nije znao da mi kaže - neki su mi rekli da komandu "purge" upotrebim na stranici slike, što nije pomoglo. Ovo sam sam provalio da se "purge" koristi kod linka za thumbnail, a ne kod stranice fajla. Toliko nerviranja zbog problema sa toliko jednostavnim rešenjem. :) PANONIAN (talk) 05:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Serbian_literature

 

Serbian literature has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Secretlondon (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Avram Grant 2012.jpg

 
File:Avram Grant 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Welcome to mecca.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Welcome to mecca.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Welcome to mecca.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:2012_U.S._diplomatic_missions_attacks

 

Category:2012_U.S._diplomatic_missions_attacks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Triggerhippie4 (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Licenca

Pozdrav, našao sam na netu ovu zanimljivu mapu Jugoslavije iz 1920:

Bilo bi dobro da se ta mapa prebaci na Viki ostavu, ali ne znam koju bih licencu stavio. Piše da je autor nepoznat, pa nisam siguran da bi tu odgovarala licenca PD-old (autor umro pre 70 godina). Šta misliš pod kojojm bi se licencom ova mapa mogla koristiti? Imaš li neki predlog? PANONIAN (talk) 22:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK, hvala za pomoć, ubacio sam mapu pod tom licencom koju si predložio. Nije to problem nacrtati, ali ova stara autentična mapa vredi više kao takva. PANONIAN (talk) 12:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


File:Spomenik Simona Gregorcica-Kobarid.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Spomenik Simona Gregorcica-Kobarid.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 15:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gore bay manitoulin island.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gore bay manitoulin island.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Makecat (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:MarathonPulpInc2000.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MarathonPulpInc2000.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Makecat (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Thornbury Harbour Entrance.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Thornbury Harbour Entrance.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Makecat (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Downtown Stouffville.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Downtown Stouffville.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Makecat (talk) 02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Zarko Paspalj.JPG

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zarko Paspalj.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zarko Paspalj.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Zarko Paspalj.JPG

 
File:Zarko Paspalj.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 06:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Zmaja od Bosne.JPG

 
File:Zmaja od Bosne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 11:18, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

map for you.

 

Penyulap 21:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Parade.png

Hello! Why do you want to delete this file? Is the file constraining? Senior Strateg (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Mendela 1.JPG

 
File:Mendela 1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Vera (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bot move to commons

Pozdrav. Da li možda možeš da pokreneš bota da prebaci sledeće slike sa engleske vikipedije na commons:

U pitanju su mape koje su neki korisnici pravili od mojih mapa, pa bi bilo dobro da budu na commonsu, jer planiram da ubacim poboljšane verzije tih fajlova. Hvala unapred. PANONIAN (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

E super, hvala ti za prebacivanje. PANONIAN (talk) 19:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Lebed.JPG

 
File:Lebed.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 21:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Andrej Tupoljev.JPG

 
File:Andrej Tupoljev.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 21:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:AhmetKan.JPG

 
File:AhmetKan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 21:39, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Зграда Факултета политичких наука.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Marko - money.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marko - money.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Marko - money.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Me and Jova Regasek.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Me and Jova Regasek.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Me and Jova Regasek.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vanja / Вања (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove problem tags

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


 
Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 06:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Omišalj.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Omišalj.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bosanska vila 1897.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:File license/layout

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 09:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Jarekt (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 21:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Udarnička značka.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 08:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Denniss (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Boško Šiljegović.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 21:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autorska prava na području bivše Jugoslavije

Ne znam da li si video, na srpskohrvatskoj Wikipediji smo pokrenuli stranicu sh:Wikipedia:Autorska prava na području bivše Jugoslavije kako bismo jednom za svagda rešili pitanje autorskih prava fotografija i ostalih dela nastalih u bivšoj Jugoslaviji. Pošto znam da često postavljaš fotografije rekoh da te obavestim. Pozdrav! --Mladifilozof (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autobot approved

Your bot has been officially approved: Commons:Bots/Requests/Autobot. Thanks for helping out in this way. Please encourage any sr speakers you know to help with categorizing the images. --99of9 (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Medicinska škola Banja Luka.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Anatoliy (talk) 22:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Pratto dela Valle Padova.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Paperoastro (talk) 22:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:M84

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Chenzw  Talk  12:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Smrt Hajduk-Veljka.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your request Kiskirályok uralmi területei

I need your help to be able to complete your request, look here and give me feedback. --Goran tek-en ([[User talk:Goran tek-en|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Spomenik borcima VRS.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Trnova-Visnjic.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Jelena Eric.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Smooth_O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Aracha.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:BajinaBastaLocationMap.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dukat_Mountain

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Yugoslavia blank map.png

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Yugoslavia blank map.png

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Uniontown PA.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:CrkvaNoviGrad.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Johankonstantihelenpeterinbelgrad 1911.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Taivo ([[User talk:Taivo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:MF Biokovo u Splitu.JPG

Template:Autotranslate IvanOS ([[User talk:IvanOS|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Messier 75.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Lithopsian ([[User talk:Lithopsian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Skadarlija - 19. vek.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Konak1900.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Kraljica Draga.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Kraljica Jelena-548.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Grb Doboja.svg

Template:Autotranslate Mister.master ([[User talk:Mister.master|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons bot inactivity

Hello!

Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Correction requests

Hello.

Can you remove the modern borders because it actually doesn't make much sense to have 20th or 21st century borders on a map featuring a travel taking place during the 16th century in File:Magellan's voyage EN.svg, File:Magellan's voyage-fr.svg, File:Magellan's voyage ET.svg, File:Magellan's voyage HU.svg, File:Magellan's voyage MK.svg, File:Magellan's voyage PL.svg, File:Magellan's voyage PT.svg, File:Magellan's voyage SR.svg, and File:Magellan's voyage zh-classical.svg?

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps myself, that is why I asked you.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist ([[User talk:Maphobbyist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Partisan Memorial in Mostar.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Carl Ha ([[User talk:Carl Ha|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Dobrenica.jpg

Template:Autotranslate j.budissin+/- 13:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pomoć oko skidanja karte sa OpenstreetMap-a

Pozdrav, želim da skinem kartu sa OpenStreetMapa kako bi je koristio na Wikipediji (onako kao što ste Vi to uradili sa kartom Beograda), ali mi nije baš jasno kako da postignem to. Da li je dovoljno da napravim screenshot karte, ili postoji mogućnost download-a karte? Nadam se da mi možete pomoći. Unaprijed zahvalanǃ Combi2000 ([[User talk:Combi2000|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:53, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File renaiming

Keep your hands off the filenames of my pictures. You don't have the right to rename it. Respect it. --Hockei ([[User talk:Hockei|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Alcheni etene.PNG

Template:Autotranslate Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Raspućin.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Rodoljub Šabić 2010.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Prof. dr. Zlatko Rendulić.JPG

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Žarko Korać.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Srđan Verbić.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Olivera Kovačević.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Slobodan Šijan.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Goran Jevtić.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Svetislav Basara.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Olja Bećković.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Return to the user page of "BokicaK/Archive 1".