Ctac

Hi Ctac, and welcome to the Commons! Please note that we can't accept "fair use" images here, including official portraits. Please see Commons:Licensing for more information. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 19:43, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Photo question

Hello Stas!

Where have you taken this photo: [1]? This is a very curious photograph! --Holly 15:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

This is photo of the exhibit from en:Kunstkamera. :)--Ctac (talk) 18:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

мошков

откуда уверенность в лицензии --Алый Король (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

В описании картинки стоит ссылка на фликр. На фликре указана лицензия: CC-BY. --Ctac (talk) 00:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

не вижу я там ссылку на фликр, поставьте тогда эту ссылку как источник и добавьте {{Flickreview}} в описание --Алый Король (talk) 06:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Пардон, не фликр, а пикаса. Ссылка стоит в описании картинки в разделе "источник"--Ctac (talk) 15:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

ага, теперь и я увидел.--Алый Король (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Photos of the May 2011 Parade in Moscow

Hello!

Thank you very much for your gorgeous contributions of vehicles that took part or were related to the May 2011 Parade in Moscow. I hope more contributions of you will follow. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Третьяковская галерея

Ctac! Здравствуйте. Будьте любезны, подскажите как вы скачивали репродукции картин Третьяковской галереи?

Выставлял у себя максимально возможное разрешение для монитора (чтобы при предпросмотре картина целиком влезала бы на экран), а потом делал скриншот.--Ctac (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Сегодня придумал новый способ. Можно юзать плагин для Файрфокса - DOM Inspektor. Им можно подправить значения границ рамки вокруг картины, чтобы при скриншоте она захватилась целиком.--Ctac (talk) 11:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Нашёл ещё один сайт: http://school-collection.edu.ru/catalog/rubr/6e5e3dad-f756-4d41-967a-909ef5813fdc/ Там, кстати, не только Третьяковка.--Ctac (talk) 11:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Разговоры в Минсвязи

Нашёл вашу реплику о совещании в Минсвязи и потому делюсь мнением. В статье 36 музейного закона в первом абзаце под словом "публикация" надо понимать не публикацию в понятиях ГК РФ, а публикацию в понятиях музейного закона. Это означает, что любой экспонат, выставленный на любой выставке, тем самым опубликован. Поэтому эта статья не мешает фотографировать. Во втором абзаце речь идёт о передаче прав на коммерческое использование, чего совершенно нет на commons. Это проблема не для нас, а для тех, кто хочет воровать у нищих российских музеев. На мой взгляд, тут нечего беспокоиться. Напротив: наш долг — изо всех сил популяризировать эту статью, чтобы музеи смогли наконец-то получить те деньги, которые причитаются им за коммерческое использование.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Намного серьёзнее другая проблема: администрации музеев запрещают фотосъёмку профессиональной аппаратурой, однако никогда не объясняют, что такое профессиональная аппаратура. Вот о чём надо трубить. Рядом с этой проблемой стоит и копирайт анонимных авторов. В музеях накоплен большой массив фотоснимков, об авторах которых нет никакой информации. На мой взгляд, следовало бы передать копирайт на эти снимки самим музеям, которые испытывают чудовищные проблемы с финансированием.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Таким образом, в этой дискуссии я отстаиваю права музеев, и вот почему. Давайте проиграем оба случая. Первый случай: анонимные коллекции музеев объявлены всеобщим достоянием. Понимая, что получить деньги за это невозможно (в лучшем случае -- по 36 статье, что вилами на воде писано), музеи предпочтут забыть о таких экспонатах, а со временем утратить их. Второй случай: анонимные коллекции музеев объявлены их достоянием. В этом случае музеи получают стимул цифровать и обрабатывать такие снимки, имея возможность выгодно ими торговать, пока не истёк копирайт.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо. Правда, я не со всем с вами согласен. Дело в том, что вы рассматриваете музеи как коммерческие организации. Например, свободное распространение фотографий фондов музеев, просветительство — вы рассматриваете как «воровство у нищих музеев». Это неверно. Музеи это организации некоммерческие. Они созданы и существуют за счёт госбюджета они вовсе не ради зарабатывания денег. Так, согласно статье 33, музеи могут заниматься, приносящей доходы деятельностью исключительно ради достижения целей создания музеев. Цели же перечислены в статье 27. Цель №1 – «осуществление просветительной, научно-исследовательской и образовательной деятельности». Соответственно, если кто-то помещает фотографии каких-то музейных предметов в Википедию, называть его вором некорректно.

P.S. Кстати, на Викискладе запрещены «некоммерческие» лицензии. См. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Non-allowable_licence_terms Это сделано для того, чтобы не было ограничений на распространение знаний. Если кто-то издаст Википедию на бумаге, то ничто не должно мешать ему, в том числе, и продавать это издание. Наша задача не зарабатывать деньги, а помогать распространять знания любым возможным способом. --Ctac (talk) 10:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Давайте допустим, что это организации некоммерческие. Почему же тогда любое обращение к ним они меряют деньгами, оценивают по прибыльности? Отсюда я и полагаю, что для сегодняшних музеев гораздо важнее выгода. Кабы не так, чем же можно объяснить их тарифы на любое сотрудничество?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

А смысл допускать, если это прямо прописано в законе? Это называется незаконные сборы. И чтобы прекратить подобное поведение руководства ряда музеев надо писать заявления в прокуратуру и жалобы в вышестоящие органы. Этим, собственно, и занимаются активисты движения "Свобода фотографии", с одним из руководителей которого - Дмитрием Терновским - я и ходил в Минсвязи. Сайт движения: http://www.svobodafoto.ru/ . --Ctac (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Moscow-City-09-05-2010.jpg

And also:

• File:Moscow-City-9-05-2011.JPG

Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Tretyakov Gallery images

Hello,

I see you've recently been uploading higher-quality versions of files from the Tretyakov Gallery. I've written a script to download the highest-quality ones possible (yours are slightly smaller); see User:InverseHypercube/tretyakov.py.

Thanks. InverseHypercube 01:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!!! It's great!--Ctac (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem. If you have any questions about its use, feel free to ask me. InverseHypercube 22:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Свобода панорамы

Вы пишете, что фонд добился, чтобы свобода панорамы была внесена в официальный проект ГК. Это очень грустно, потому что в результате творческая работа архитекторов будет украдена у них, тогда как творческая работа художников, скульпторов, фотографов, писателей и музыкантов продолжает охраняться. Неужели вслед за этим будет ограбление и писателей, и всех остальных творцов? Мой опыт показывает, что такие поправки сами по себе не нужны, потому что можно получать разрешения у архитекторов. Это не бином ньютона, это не требует каких-то нечеловеческих способностей.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

А о том, что несвобода панорамы мешает развитию свободного знания, вы когда-нибудь задумывались? Распространение свободного контента - цель проектов фонда Викимедия, и если вам эта цель чужда - вас никто не заставляет здесь работать. A.Savin 11:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Вы считаете, что надо отнять у писателей книги, у художников картины, у архитекторов здания, у композиторов музыку, у скульпторов статуи? Всю творческую работу следует сделать общественным достоянием, чтобы никто больше не старался её делать? Вы согласны для начала с тем, что ваши записи в викискладе опубликованы под свободной лицензией, то есть вы передали любому человеку право изменить их? Или вы всё-таки считаете (как видно из практики), что ваш вклад никому изменять нельзя, что он только "для виду" свободный?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Если ваша цель — распространять свободный контент, почему же не заполнять викисклад книгами современных авторов? Почему же не добавлять картины послевоенных художников? Ведь несвобода научно-популярной литературы и несвобода соцреализма мешает развитию свободного знания!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Не надо тех, кто с вашими тезисами о копирайте не согласен, выставлять как болванов. Мне кажется, что вы все-таки понимаете небольшую разницу, а если и нет - сравните количество тех пользователей, кто загружает откровенное копивио, и тех кто загружает собственные снимки зданий в общественных местах, в силу того что им просто и в голову не приходит, что загрузка стоящего в общественном месте на всеобщем обозрении здания может чьи-то права нарушать. А заодно и сравните количество стран в цивилизованной части мира со свободой панорамы и без оной. Без этого сравнения ваше собственное вышеприведенное сравнение схоже, пардон, сравнению задницы с пальцем. A.Savin 12:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Снимки охраняемых зданий — это и есть копивио. В России никому не приходит в голову, что бесплатное контрафактное тиражирование книг и картин может чьи-то права нарушать. От этого и идут беспокойные письма авторских коллективов. Люди в России очень расположены к пиратству и нарушению чужих прав.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Ну да. В России, а также в США, Канаде, Германии, Австрии, Англии,..., список можно продолжить. A.Savin 14:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Судя по скандалам с защитой авторских прав в США, где принимались решения о существенных штрафах за их нарушение, там действительно расположены к пиратству. Однако здесь, на викискладе, собрались люди, которые стараются защищать авторское право. Именно авторское право позволяет нам, участникам викисклада, управлять своими правами и передавать их всем другим людям на строгих условиях свободной лицензии. Упразднение авторских прав затрагивает всех нас.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Боюсь, вы не совсем поняли. Свобода панорамы - это несколько совсем другое. Об "ограблении" архитекторов и речи не идёт. Их права прекрасно защищены. Например, статья 1273 ГК запрещает воспроизведение их проектов в форме зданий и сооружений без их на то разрешения. И никто и никогда на эту статью не покушался. Нам не нравится совсем другая статья ГК - 1276, согласно которой, нельзя без разрешения архитектора фотографировать и снимать на видео, например, фасад здания на улице или памятник на городской площади, если они являются основным объектом съёмки. Требовать заключать письменный договор с каждым архитектором/наследником если ты просто фотографируешь на улице - абсурд. Де факто, эта статья всё равно никогда не работала (все граждане, включая даже президента РФ, её игнорируют). Страдают от неё только участники Викисклада, которые пытаются буквально соблюдать все законы РФ, даже абсурдные. Как, например, сейчас, когда пытаются удалить с Викисклада все фотографии Москва-Сити, т.к. письменные лицензионные договоры с каждым архитектором этих зданий наши фотографы, естественно, не заключали. --Ctac (talk) 19:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Вы перегибаете палку. Статья 1276 разрешает что угодно, если нет коммерческих целей. Фотографировать можно, а нельзя продавать. Точно так же нельзя и фотографировать для коммерческих целей чужие книги, или картины, или статуи — там тоже нужен письменный договор. Давайте тогда бороться за снятие охраны с учебников и справочников, с научно-популярной литературы и художественных альбомов? И, наконец, отнимем фотографии у всех авторов-фотографов?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Увы, в 1276 есть бессмысленный запрет на "основной объект фото". Что же касается "перегибания палки", то, боюсь, это относится не ко мне :). Сейчас Вы зачем-то протестуете против того о чём речи и не шло и то, что сами только что и придумали. Пожалуйста, посмотрите ГК. Статья 1276 относится исключительно к произведениям, которые "постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения".--Ctac (talk) 20:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Все книги постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения. И музыка точно так же находится в нём.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

В статье есть слово "постоянно". Поэтому ни книги, ни музыка тут не имеются в виду.--Ctac (talk) 22:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Ох. Книги всегда открыты для свободного чтения, возьми с полки да читай, запишись в библиотеку да читай. А уж музыка тем более -- она же в голове звучит, её же из головы поют. Однако то и другое тщательно укрыто копирайтом. Лишь от хлеба архитекторов хотят откусить...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

На хлеб архитекторов никто не покушается. Архитекторы зарабатывают на архитектурных проектах, они защищены не хуже книг и музыки. Что касается свободы панорамы, то нет ни одного (!) архитектора, который бы зарабатывал, собирая роялти с фотографов, фотографирующих дома. --Ctac (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

На хлеб писателей и художников тоже — просто мы хотим иметь право даром тиражировать фотографии их произведений, как с архитекторами. Что же тут такого! Писатели ведь зарабатывают на издательских проектах, а художники на оформительских. Что же до роялти архитекторов, то вы с ними поговорите. Архитектура — это отвратительный мир, где за всё приходится платить нечеловеческие суммы, и вопрос заработка там чрезвычайно остро звучит.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Теперь вы уже сами себе противоречите, если верить вашим первым высказываниям в этой теме. Если получить разрешение от архитектора на коммерческое использование так просто, как вы утверждаете, то это может только означать, что они вовсе не стремятся на этом заработать? Но мне все-таки кажется, что все как раз наоборот, и ваше утверждение о якобы несложном получении разрешения - всего лишь один из псевдоаргументов в пользу франко-бельгийской модели, при которой заурядный фотограф вообще никаких прав фактически не имеет и некоторые бравые наследнички на том только и наживаются, чтобы ничего не подозревающих туристов с мыльницами на бабло сажать, потому что они-де, видите ли, подлецы такие-сякие, архитекторов грабят. Но все уже знают, что вы не хотите свободу панорамы, и вам вовсе не обязательно лезть с этим к ВМ-РУ; они стараются добиться того, чего желает бОльшая часть сообщества википедии, а не вы. A.Savin 23:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Получить разрешение действительно просто. Это не требует сверхчеловеческих способностей. Просто надо убедить архитектора в том, что деньги ему не нужны — а такое людям под силу. Мне вот удаётся понемножечку. Прошу вас не перевирать мои слова, я говорю не про туристов с мыльницами. Я говорю про коммерческое использование фотографий, которым и занимается викисклад. Если большая часть сообщества (и вы среди них) желают освободить панораму, тогда это сообщество (и вы в том числе) должны обращаться к архитекторам и получать у них разрешения. Я надеюсь, что именно этим вы и занимаетесь.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Большая часть сообщества википедии желает даром распоряжаться чужими картинами и книгами. Очевидно, ВМ-РУ должны требовать отмены авторских прав!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Вы, может быть, говорите про коммерческое использование, а вот я говорю про то, как оно есть на самом деле, когда активно лоббируемая вами франко-бельгийская модель показывает свое истинное лицо. Ну а если ВМ-РУ, по-вашему, должен требовать не только введения свободы панорамы но и вообще отмены всего авторского права, то вы, наверное, должны требовать отмены 70-летнего срока для перехода в общественное достояние. Действительно, где справедливость, если супруги, дети и внуки могут на засранцах-фотографах сколачивать себе состояние, а вот всяким там прапрапра...правнукам остается только глодать кости на погосте. Заодно можно тогда и с чистой совестью всю категорию Buildings in Russia на удаление выставить. ... A.Savin 01:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Это истинное лицо уже давно показано в отношении творческих произведений художников, скульпторов, писателей, композиторов, артистов — и это не просто никого не смущает, но даже наоборот, охрану стараются усиливать. Отмену авторского права предлагаете вы, начиная с архитекторов.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Triumf-Palace-in-trees.JPG

File:Triumf-Palace-in-trees.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.181.19 12:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Semashko monument.jpg

File:Semashko monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

File:10 rub 2004 kem.jpg - название

Вам не кажется, что File:10 rub 2004 kem.jpg и File:10 rub 2004 ryazhsk.jpg лучше было бы назвать File:RR5514-0021R.jpg и File:RR5514-0022R.jpg соответственно? --Mauser98k (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Если Вы считаете, что такое переименование необходимо, то, пожалуйста, переименуйте их. P.S. есть ещё 10_rub_2005_borovsk.jpg.--Ctac (talk) 18:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

File:10_rub_2004_kem.jpg выставил на переименование. Если нормально переименуют - другие так же выставлю. На сколько я понимаю, чтоб сразу переименовать нужен специальный флаг. --Mauser98k (talk) 20:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Кстати, Вам не кажется, что Ваши фото этих трёх монет немного темноваты? --Mauser98k (talk) 05:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Это не фото, я их сканировал. Стояли настройки по умолчанию в сканере, т.к. они (вроде бы) правильно передают цвета. Я боюсь осветлять, чтобы не испортить цвета. Может Вы возьмётесь?--Ctac (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

ОК. Как будет время - поэксперементирую с цветом. --Mauser98k (talk) 13:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Отлично! Спасибо!--Ctac (talk) 15:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 17:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!--Ctac (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Ctac, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Экспарре, Оскар Рейнгольдович

Здравствуйте я Александр написал эту статью о члене государственного совета из дореволюционной книги Альманах современных русских государственных деятелей изданной в 1897 году. В вики я обнаружил этот фаил вы загрузили его из книги члены государственного совета изданной в 1915 году. Я незнаю с какой страницы вы взяли его фото поэтому прошу вас продолжить его биографию из этой книги. Заранее благодарен

Там обновился дизайн сайта и ссылка умерла. Вот, правильная ссылка: http://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01003502123#?page=132 --Ctac (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

• Здравствуйте это опять я. Я написал статью Чолокаев,_Николай_Николаевич --2001:4C28:1:1:226:B9FF:FEFD:FFB8 15:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)отсюда немогли бы вы из книги члены государственного совета добавить в статью инфу и фото ?.

  Ок. Добавил.--Ctac (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Source of Wiki-conference-2013 files

Hello. Could you please change the source to the actual flickr photo, not just the profile? It may cause problems with bots. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Teshik-Tash Boy.jpg

File:Teshik-Tash Boy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо

Спасибо за откровения. Наконец-то опыт РИАН начинает обобщаться, а там авось и польза от этого опыта придёт. Я очень хочу использовать аргументы РИАН в работе с другими учреждениями, которые никак не могут понять, зачем «взять хлеб у детей и бросить псам» (Мк. 7, 27). Под «детьми» тут разумеются деньги.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

РГАФД: почему, почему? Напомню их прейскурант. Цифровая реставрация 700 рублей в минуту, копирование звукозаписи 700 рублей в минуту, то есть в результате на ВМ-РУ архив теряет 1400 рублей за каждую минуту звукозаписи. Зачем они отказываются от живых денег? Хорошо бы спросить об этом.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

• Они не коммерсанты. И, кроме того, практически никто эти записи (которые перешли в PD) у них не покупает. А так об архиве узнают больше людей.--Ctac (talk) 08:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Как это не коммерсанты, если 700 рублей за минуту за простое копирование? Видимо, вы хотели сказать, что они маленькие коммерсанты с небольшим доходом. Однако вопрос остаётся по-прежнему: почему они предлагают бесплатно то, что могут продать? Почему они решили отказаться от денег? Какую выгоду они получат, если откажутся от денег?
  • Например, публикуя песню в 3 минуты, они теряют (3 минуты * (700 рублей копирование + 700 рублей реставрация) * 5 продаж) = 21 тысячу рублей. Неужели аргумент «узнает больше людей» заставляет терять двадцать одну тысячу рублей? А как же печальный опыт газеты, популярность которой не изменилась? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Abrogation.gif

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Abrogation.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm the author of this drawing and made it specifically for Wikipedia. License and author listed in the description of this picture since 2007.--Ctac (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Luigi Denza.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luigi Denza.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luigi Denza.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

太刻薄 (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Luigi Denza.jpg

File:Luigi Denza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lenin v parke dekabrskogo vosstaniya.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

:)

I've been looking for a user like you! I've been working on the CPSU Central Committee articles on English WP (like this one for instance, Central Committee elected by the 15th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)), and WP currently lacks tons of PD images (not surprising since everything published after 1 January 1926 is deemed copyrighted according to US laws).. However, many of these individuals should have images of themselves pre-1926... I'm currently working on the CC elected at the 13th Party Congress, and (not surprising) the earlier you get the more PD images you get.... To the point; are you, or anyone else on RU WP, focusing on uploading PD images of missing CC members (several Politburo, Secretariat and Orgburo members are also missing photos)? --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

I am uploading photos from the album of the history of the CPSU (b). There are photographs of the members of Communist Party Congresses, which took place before 1917 (1st to 6th Congresses). I think that by the end of next week I will upload them all. --Ctac (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Jippi! Would you be willing to ping me or add them to the category Category:Congresses of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union? In any case, thanks. You're work is really needed ; for some strange reason WP lacks pictures of most members of the CC pre-1912.. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 21:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Васильев, Михаил Петрович (капитан 2-го ранга)

На странице М. П. Васильева Вами ошибочно добавлена фотография: Visiliev MP.jpg. На самом деле это известная фотография командира крейсера Варяг В. Ф. Руднева. Понимаю, что Вас подвёл источник, но фотографию надо удалить. С уважением, GtorgeK (talk) 14:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Спасибо огромное, что заметили! Файл уже переименован, а его описание исправлено.--Ctac (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Info...

Just as you know, pictures taken in Russia are only in the public domain if published before 1 January 1926. This is because of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. So while those pictures are in the public domain in Russia, they are not in the public domain in the United States. Wikimedia Commons is located on US servers... Images which weren't in the public domain in the US in 1996 have to wait 70 more years.. Opps, ment 2048. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

No, I do not agree. As I understand it, in the United States on an anonymous work, which by 1989 passed into the public domain, a period of 95 years from creation does not apply. The photos that I downloaded last week in the public domain in Russia. Moreover, they probably do not need to be protected content, as they are not creative works (These are standard pictures from the investigation of cases. They did an unknown photographer in the NKVD prison before the execution of these poets / writers in the year 1937/38)--Ctac (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

True, the chances of the Russian government pursuing copyright infringement on images taken before the NKVD killing them is close to nill... The chance of the Russian government pursuing copyright infringement at all is also close to zero. However, you should at least persuade the Commons community on this, right? I believe it should be easy to persuade them on the first part; that the Russian government will not pursue copyright on images taken by the NKVD during the Great Purge... It would be political suicide if they even contemplated it. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

In any case, could you help me to find PD images of these people; Jānis Bērziņš-Ziemelis (who is THIS? the source said Ziemelis but the birth and death years are wrong so...), Grigory Fedorov, Nikolai Glebov-Avilov, Alexander Pravdin, Alexander Beloborodov, Nikolay Komarov, Ivan Kutuzov, Vasily Mikhailov, Ivan Tuntul, Valerian Osinsky and Isaak Zelensky? All these sat in the Central Committee before 1923. It really bugs me when the CC list is missing only two images, like these two en:Central Committee elected by the 9th Congress of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and en:Central Committee elected by the 7th Congress of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) for instance]]... Sincerely, --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Gredeskul Nik Andr2.jpg

Уважаемый коллега! Зачем Вы загрузили в качестве версии файла совершенно новое изображение, которое не соответствует ни времени создания, отсутствует в источнике и т.п., а кроме того и с плохим разрешением? Так поступать не следует, С уважением, Hunu (talk) 05:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

А разве это не то же самое фото, но в лучшем разрешении?--Ctac (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Во-первых в худшем, во-вторых другое, его нет в этом источнике. Hunu (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:The X-Ray Fiend.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Gredeskul Nik Andr2.jpg

Уважаемый коллега! Загруженный Вами вариант этого изображения не имеет никакого отношения к изданию Боиовича, снят, вероятно, ранее 1907 года. И на мой взгляд, существенно худшего качества, чем предшествующий вариант. Эту проблему надо бы как-то решить. С уважением. Hunu (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Мне показалось, что это одна и та же фотография. Давайте вернём предыдущий вариант, если он Вам кажется лучше.--Ctac (talk) 11:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Lomshkov Alexey Step2.jpg

Дорогой коллега! Еще раз убедительно Вас прошу не фальсифицировать данные о загружаемых Вами файлах, предложенный Вами портрета Ломшакова не имеет никакого отношения к книге Бойовича. Если Вы хотите, чтобы он был доступен в пространстве Википедии, загружайте его ка отдельный новый файл. Настаиваю, чтобы Вы устранили все самоуправно загруженные файлы с неверным указанием источников. Иначе буду вынужден обратиться к администраторам. Когда загружаете новый файл убедиться, пожалуйста, заранее, что он лучшего качества, с лучшим разрешением и отредактируйте его (присмотритесь внимательно к тому портрету, что Вы загрузили - у Ломшакова , что? каша к бороде присохла?). Hunu (talk) 06:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Сравнение Ваших и старых версий

Разве это одно и то же: File:Zarubin, Ivan Kondrat'evich.jpg, File:Алексей Николаевич Будищев (1867-1916).jpg? Следует для каждой персоны создать, если ее нет, категорию, и загрузить туда первую и Вашу версии, как отдельные файлы. Если Вы мою просьбу проигнорируете, я буду вынужден обратиться к администраторам. Hunu (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

На мой взгляд, тут очевидно, что это одни и те же фото, но только в лучшем качестве, без геометрических искажений, JPEG-артефактов и ретуши. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, ещё раз внимательнее сами.--Ctac (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Solyakov PV.jpg

Откуда сведения, что автор умер более 70 лет назад, если он неизвестен? --Semenov.m7 (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

См. п.2 ст. 1281 ГК РФ: "На произведение, обнародованное анонимно или под псевдонимом, срок действия исключительного права истекает через семьдесят лет, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом его правомерного обнародования. Если в течение указанного срока автор произведения, обнародованного анонимно или под псевдонимом, раскроет свою личность или его личность не будет далее оставлять сомнений, исключительное право будет действовать в течение срока, установленного пунктом 1 настоящей статьи.". В данном случае, фото опубликовано в журнале анонимно, без указания автора ("Огонёк" обычно всегда указывает фотографов, но не в этом случае), а также до 2009 года автор не раскрыл своё имя. Соответственно, сроки считаем с даты публикации, то есть с 1938 года, 70 лет прошли - произведение в общественном достоянии. --Ctac (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Image for use in television show: National Museum of Crime and Punishmen - John Dillinger death mask with black background.jpg

Hello Ctac! Thanks for uploading your image to the creative commons! My name is Brandon and I work at a production company in Minneapolis Minnesota, called Committee Films. We are currently producing a television show in which we would like to briefly use your image titled, "National Museum of Crime and Punishmen - John Dillinger death mask with black background.jpg." Although you have submitted your image into the creative commons, I would still like to get a more formal form of permission. You can contact me at brandon.juarez@committeefilms.com. I look forward to hearing from you and thanks again for providing such a great image to the Creative Commons!

Best, Brandon — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.194.196.193 (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image for use in TV Show

Hello Ctac! I just want to reach out to you for a second time. Thanks for uploading your image to the creative commons! We are currently producing a television show in which we would like to briefly use your image titled, "National Museum of Crime and Punishmen - John Dillinger death mask with black background.jpg." Although you have submitted your image into the creative commons, I would still like to get a more formal form of permission. You can contact me at brandon.juarez@committeefilms.com. I look forward to hearing from you and thanks again for providing such a great image to the Creative Commons! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.194.196.193 (talk) 16:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes. It is really my photo. You can use it (licence: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported).--Ctac (talk) 19:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image for use in TV Show--Reply

Hello Ctac!

Thanks for your permission for us to use this image in our show! Thanks for sharing your photo in the creative commons as well! I just wanted to let you know that we can't always adhere perfectly to the Creative Commons Licensing terms. We WILL be able to credit you, however, we will be unable to provide a link to the license terms and we will be unable to provide a list of any changes that were made to the image. Television credits make these requests difficult to abide by given that there is only so much space/time on the screen. Given this information, would you still be okay with us using your image? Feel free to reply via this discussion page or email me at brandon.juarez@committeefilms.com with your permission or any other questions or concerns! Thanks so much! I look forward to hearing back from you! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:448:C100:C927:91A5:1EC2:8E8:B8A (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Ok. No problem. --Ctac (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Wmru-rgafd.jpg

File:Wmru-rgafd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Яй (talk) 18:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

File:1 ruble XX let pobedy 1965.jpg

File:1 ruble XX let pobedy 1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vahe (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Leontiev&Katkov.jpg

Уважаемый коллега, на фотографии изображен (сидящим) не Константин Николаевич, а Павел Михайлович Леонтьев. Сходство легко заметить, взглянув на портрет П.М. Леонтьева на его странице Википедии. Да и вообще — П.М. Леонтьев и М.Н. Катков вместе редактировали "Московские Ведомости", вот и снялись. А с К.Н. Леонтьевым Каткова связывала некоторая общность взглядов, но это еще не повод фотографироваться))

Надо не только переименовать файл, но и удалить картинку из статьи о К.Н.

И кстати: Библиотека Конгресса — великое учреждение, но американцы дураки, это всякий знает. (Пардон за неполиткорректность, это просто финальное bon mot). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Бирюков Андрей (talk • contribs) 10:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Спасибо! Всё исправил.--Ctac (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Mayakovskiy deathbed.jpg

File:Mayakovskiy deathbed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IgorMagic (talk) 07:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

2 Жижиленко

Добрый день! Вы уверены в идентификации этого изображения File:Zhizhilenko, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich.jpg, Потому что то же самое изображение ru:File:Zizilenko.jpg отнесено к другому персонажу ru:Жижиленко, Александр Иванович. Очевидно, что где-то ошибка. Hunu (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@Hunu. Да, уверен. См. http://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01004103488#?page=546 --Ctac (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Gahn Johan Gottlieb.jpg

File:Gahn Johan Gottlieb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ivan zassoursky.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ivan zassoursky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ivan zassoursky.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Яй (talk) 02:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the author's instagram, where a free license for this photo was indicated, was closed. I wrote him a request to send permission to OTRS.--Ctac (talk) 06:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Audio_files_of_songs

Audio files of songs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 06:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Фото 1907 года

• Скажите пожалуйста, File:Schmit NP deathbed.jpg был опубликован? Если это анонимный неопубликованный снимок, тогда срок его охраны ещё не закончился. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Это опубликованный архивом снимок. --Ctac (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
    • Вы считаете, что включение фотографии в каталог экспонатов музея является публикацией? Откуда вы делаете этот вывод? В законе «О Музейном фонде Российской Федерации и музеях в Российской Федерации» в статье 10 («Государственный каталог Музейного фонда Российской Федерации») не говорится о том, что включение фотографии в каталог является публикацией. И фотограф не указан, поэтому нельзя доказать, что он умер ранее 1943 года. Значит, снимок опубликован менее чем через 74 года после смерти фотографа, и поэтому срок охраны начинается с года публикации и продлится ещё много десятков лет. Получается, что на Викискладе его хранить нельзя. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
      • А с чего Вы взяли, что это первая публикация снимка 1907 года?--Ctac (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
        • Так ведь в описании не дана ссылка на прижизненную авторскую публикацию. Отсюда и сомнения. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
          • Явно репортажный снимок для газеты. Скорее всего, автор Карл Булла. Полистайте газеты за февраль 1907 года.--Ctac (talk) 11:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
            • Обязанность доказывать свободу фотоснимка лежит на загружающем. Предвижу, что какой-нибудь усердный администратор Викисклада выставит снимок на удаление. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
            • Итак, вы ничем не можете доказать публикацию этого снимка? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MassalitinovaVO.jpg

Copyright status: File:MassalitinovaVO.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:MassalitinovaVO.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Definitely "PD-Russia": the photo from the book which was published in 1924 + author is unknown.--Ctac (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Putin i doverennye litsa.jpg

Copyright status: File:Putin i doverennye litsa.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Putin i doverennye litsa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre, ??? License is {{Kremlin.ru}}, i.e. CC-BY 4.0.--Ctac (talk) 07:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

That's only a source, not a license. See Template talk:Kremlin.ru#Source template or License template. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Matros Koshka.png

And also:

• File:СМ Матрос Кошка.jpg

Yours sincerely, Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 13:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Ctac,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Freedom-Hand-Butterfly puzzles.png

Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Pavlov DG.jpg

File:Pavlov DG.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Freedom-Hand-Butterfly puzzles.png

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Dead Rasputin.jpg

File:Dead Rasputin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:E0A:487:CBD0:2881:A46D:3E96:FA20 22:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Znak pochetnoy gramoty Prezidenta RF.png

File:Znak pochetnoy gramoty Prezidenta RF.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 11:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Valerian Kuibushev.jpg

File:Valerian Kuibushev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kuibyshev Valerian Vladimirovich.jpg

Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition

Hi, based on these surces do you think it's possible to have an article about Wiki Science Competition on ruwiki? I was planning to finally create one on enwikipedia after the end of the 2019 edition, in circa 2 months, but it would help if it already exists in some other languages where the notability treshold is more clear with less issues.

I have onyl created d:Q72737290 in the meantime. Bye.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Fedko Ivan Fedorovich.jpg

File:Fedko Ivan Fedorovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Karakhan LM.jpg

File:Karakhan LM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Alexejew Michail.jpg

File:Alexejew Michail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Moscow Embassy of Sweden BW.png

Copyright status: File:Moscow Embassy of Sweden BW.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Moscow Embassy of Sweden BW.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Pavel Troshkin

Здравствуйте, уважаемый коллега. Возможно, вы захотите высказаться в этом обсуждении. --VLu (talk) 11:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Социал-демократическая фракция I государственной думы.jpg

Добрый день, Стас, спасибо, что загрузили версию этого изображения с хорошим разрешением. Но почему-то оно только в виде Мини загружается? Hunu (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Странно. Вроде бы там всё нормально. Файл 2165 × 1765 пикселей.--Ctac (talk) 22:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Да, я тоже не понимаю в чем дело. Но посмотрите, пожалуйста, вот в этой статье: ru:Выровой, Захарий Иванович Hunu (talk) 06:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

У меня там все как обычно. Попробуйте в другом браузере перепроверить--Ctac (talk) 08:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Vishnevskiy IM.jpg

File:Vishnevskiy IM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Milyutin vp.jpg

File:Milyutin vp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gumilev NS.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Shkiryatov MF.jpg

File:Shkiryatov MF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open!

Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.

С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.

С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bolsheviki deputats.jpg

Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Storzhakov AN.jpg

File:Storzhakov AN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kuibyshev Valerian Vladimirovich.jpg

File:Kuibyshev Valerian Vladimirovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Znak Gospremii RF.png

File:Znak Gospremii RF.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Redboston 21:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Lyakin Ivan Petrovich.jpg

File:Lyakin Ivan Petrovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Butcher boys1.jpg

And also:

• File:Butcher boys2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--14:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

creator:Stanislav Kozlovsky

Здравствуйте! Вы бы не могли на своих фотографиях поставить шаблон вашего авторства? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the template! I've uploaded several thousand photos and I'm afraid that I won't be able to add the template manually. But on future uploads, I will use this template. Thanks again!--Ctac (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Спасибо! MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 13:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Dybenko & Makhno.jpg

File:Dybenko & Makhno.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 16:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Vinogradov deathmask.jpg

File:Vinogradov deathmask.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yellow Horror (talk) 20:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg at Miniatur13.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg at Miniatur01.jpg

And also:

• File:Hamburg at Miniatur05.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur06.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur07.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur09.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur10.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg at Miniatur12.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg at Miniatur02.jpg

And also:

• File:Hamburg at Miniatur03.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur04.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur08.jpg
• File:Hamburg at Miniatur11.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Платонов Андрей Платонович.jpg

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

File:DD Sontsov.jpg

На фронтисписе «Альбома пятидесятилетнего юбилея Московского Императорского общества любителей конского бега: 1834—1884.», который был составлен Д. Д. Сонцовым изображён, к сожалению, не он, а граф Алексей Григорьевич Орлов-Чесменский (см.Обсуждение:Сонцов, Дмитрий Дмитриевич, а также здесь). Вы как автор загрузки не могли бы дать заявку переименовать файл?! --Nick Fishman (talk) 12:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Да, вы правы! Переименовал файл.--Ctac (talk) 19:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Sakharova KS.jpg

File:Sakharova KS.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : PlanespotterA320.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Krenkel ET.jpg

File:Krenkel ET.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Shirshov PP.jpg

File:Shirshov PP.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : PlanespotterA320.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:TagantsevNS.jpg

Copyright status: File:TagantsevNS.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:TagantsevNS.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Pakhman SV.jpg
• File:Filosofov DA.jpg
• File:KutlerNN.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Omitted the closing curly brace. Everything has already been fixed.--Ctac (talk) 09:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Portrait of Józef Brandt by Bolesław Szańkowski (1910).jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eduardo Villegas Megías 1.jpg

Copyright status: File:Eduardo Villegas Megías 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eduardo Villegas Megías 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Eduardo Villegas Megías 2.jpg
• File:Eduardo Villegas Megías 3.jpg
• File:Eduardo Villegas Megías 4.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Heinrich Floris Schopenhauer2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Heinrich Floris Schopenhauer2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Floris Schopenhauer2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Vladislav flyarkovsky.jpg

File:Vladislav flyarkovsky.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: False license, taken from not free source http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/photomif/view/454122?page=1 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FlorianH76.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Albert Einstein DC.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--17:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ru-wiki awards-2010.jpg

#invoke:Autotranslate 188.123.231.10 03:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Substituting a different picture for an original

You think, you upgraded this picture, when in fact you overlayed it with a diferent issue of the same picture. Don't it again! Apologies if abrupt. Broichmore (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Now put in the correct source

At this point, you now need to edit this image and correct the source, for where you actually got it. Please note, that just because a jpeg is a bigger file, does not mean it's a better, or more accurate picture of the original. Broichmore (talk) 20:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)