Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Gbawden/Archive 1

< User talk:Gbawden
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Gbawden in topic Undelete Deleted Photo
Learn more about this page


test edit

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Gbawden!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:SAS Queen Modjadji I (S103).jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:SAS Queen Modjadji I (S103).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Genl Reg Otto.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Genl Reg Otto.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Genl George Meiring.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Genl George Meiring.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Genl Jannie Geldenhuys.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Genl Jannie Geldenhuys.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Genl George Meiring.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Genl George Meiring.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Genl George Meiring.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

January (talk) 13:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Genl Jannie Geldenhuys.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Genl Jannie Geldenhuys.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Genl Jannie Geldenhuys.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

January (talk) 13:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:L2 wo.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L2 wo.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:L2 wo.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:L3 wo.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L3 wo.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:L3 wo.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:L4a.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L4a.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:L4a.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:L4 wo.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L4 wo.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:L4 wo.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Wo1.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wo1.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wo1.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Wo2.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wo2.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wo2.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:SA Army E4 rank insignia.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:SA Army E4 rank insignia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:L1 sm.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L1 sm.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:L1 sm.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 09:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Van riebeeck decoration.gif edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Van riebeeck decoration.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Van riebeeck decoration.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 09:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 09:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Lt Genl Gilbert Ramano.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Lt Genl Gilbert Ramano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:William Anderson Bloomfield.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:William Anderson Bloomfield.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Robert George Scott.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Robert George Scott.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:14, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Horace Edward Ramsden.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Horace Edward Ramsden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:John Sherwood-Kelly.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:John Sherwood-Kelly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:William Henry Hewitt.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:William Henry Hewitt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Ebrahim Patel - World Economic Forum on Africa 2011.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Charles Nqakula.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Charles Nqakula.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Morning ☼ (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

the date entry edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Gbawden, the date-entry in the description template is for the date of the work, not for the date of the upload (which is recorded anyway in the upload log). For historical portrait it is especially important to have the correct date (year), if available, in this field. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Lyndsay Morgan.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Lyndsay Morgan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MilborneOne (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Gary Wilcox.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Gary Wilcox.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MilborneOne (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Duplicates edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

If you are going to do a DR for a duplicate, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr. Pathrose Parathuvayalil MD(Ay).jpg, it would helpful if you linked both files, as most Admins will want to look at both.

There is also the {{Duplicate}} tag which is actually a little slower for Admins, but which you may find useful.

Please ensure that in every case if one file is in use, that you nominate the other one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok - think I worked out the best way - using : before the file name. Thanks Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sorry -- I shouldn't have assumed that you knew how to link to a file rather than display it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Thompson Alan Navy.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Thompson Alan Navy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 10:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Keith Payne VC AWM LES690593VN.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Keith Payne VC AWM LES690593VN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rcbutcher (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saalbach, Horst 2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, if there is a duplicate of a file you should change the article accordingly. The bot will otherwise simply remove the file link[1]. Thank you --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  10:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Enough edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

  We've left enough messages on your talk page which tell you to provide better sourcing and licensing. I now see you've uploaded a whole bevy of images from English Wikipedia which were created by the US military and which you sloppily placed the {{Own}} tag on as the source, while omitting the real source which was present on English Wikipedia. Please provide a better sourcing to your images. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to mark all of them as unsourced, as I don't have the time or patience to clean up after you. If you want to keep them on Commons, please go and fix the source. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:Language templates with no text displayed edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Gbawden. Please fix your uploads that appear in the maintenance category Category:Language templates with no text displayed. --Leyo 19:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:CAPTwilliamFbringleUSN.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CAPTwilliamFbringleUSN.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Whats the point of marking these files for transfer to commons on wikipedia if they don't meet the commons criteria in the first place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbawden (talk • contribs) 06:29, January 24, 2014‎ (UTC)
They do meet Commons' criteria. It's just that you chose the option on the bot to state that they were "own work", when they were not "own work" by the uploader - they were clearly created by a third party. I admit I didn't respond very well - I probably should have tutored you. Still, could you please go through those images and fix the source information? If you do that, they will no longer have to be deleted. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Here is an example of how to fix it: basically just move the source information into the source field.[2] Let me know if you have any other questions. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sorry I thought that ForTheCommonGood automatically copied over that information. What do I do in the case where no author or source information is provided by the original uploader on Wikipedia? Thanks. Graham Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Take this case for example. You would move all of the above information into the source field. Unless the original uploader is also the author, that means you always remove the {{Own}} tag (as you'll notice it states there in the comment change this if not own work). If the original upload doesn't provide a source at all, then you would still remove the own tag and replace it with nothing (in this case, the image might get deleted from Commons as some point regardless of whether you remove the own tag, because the original uploader at Wikipedia failed to provide sufficient source information). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Got it - will be more careful with FTCG in future Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Fellatio.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Pornography" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Categories for your kind information edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, some categories have been tagged as {categorize}, therefore p.e. that edit has been fixed, best regards Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

{moved here, as started here, quotation start:}
Thanks for letting me know. Will be more careful in future Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
{moved here, as started here, quotation end.}
Hi, please axcuse my missing feedback: thank you for your feedback and your comprehension; you're welcome, kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:MGEN Charles L Carr.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:MGEN Charles L Carr.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 04:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Gbawden,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Lt Cdr Nigel Ward IWM FKD 541.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Lt Cdr Nigel Ward IWM FKD 541.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I assume you just put in the wrong information. Could you please have a peek? Thanks a bunch! :-)) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi. This was a mistake on my part. I assumed that all IWM stuff was free so uploaded this pic. It can be deleted. Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A request edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In this edit you advised me you had opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2014/03/Category:Curtis M. Scaparrotti. I'd like to know what your justification was, but this discussion had been deleted.

I voiced my concerns over that deletion at User talk:Denniss.

I wrote there that, IMO, contributors like you should not remove elements from existing categories -- since that can trigger their premature deletion. Instead, I think the discussion should run its course, and the elements only moved if the discussion's consensus aligns with choosing the new category.

So, I am going to request you that, in future, you simply initiate the discussion, and not move elements from the existing category to the new category -- unless the discussion's consensus aligns with your opinion.

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 21:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Musée des beaux-arts et d'archéologie de Vienne edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. In this category, you added many pictures of roman oil lamps. But it's not written anywhere they are in the Musée des beaux-arts et d'archéologie de Vienne (Fine Arts and archaeology museum in Vienne (France)). How do you know ? Is this a mistake ? Shall we remove this category ? Nonopoly (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Nonopoly. It looks like I might have made a mistake - I cannot remember why I moved them. Thanks for picking this up Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
ok ! I'll remove this category... Even if I'd like to know whre these lamps come from... (the file is not clear, even on flickr...)... I know you don't know... Nonopoly (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:2014 Military Bowl edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. You uploaded five photos of different people from Flickr that I have added to Category:2014 Military Bowl. (File:141227-D-HU462-240 (15503380274).jpg, etc). In all of them, you uploaded the photo from flickr, which incorrectly identifies the subject as en:Bryan B. Battaglia. I don't think any of these five people are Battaglia. Do you know who they are? Can you update the descriptions to tell who these people are? Thanks. --B (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Delorean edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion

You delete my file with comments "I sincerely doubt that this is own work". What I shoud to do because i made this photo with my own photoaparat. I have genuine file. Why You dont want this photo? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Delorean-20151021.jpg Here You find look from my house https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001403239255 https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Beno Beno (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC) BenoReply

I only have changed this my file in Photoshop tumake more luminocity. Beno (talk) 06:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I speak emglish and german bad, I'm age 50+ I made this photo with Pentax K10. I dont'y know what to do and I dont't like to speak with robots. Why du hast not speaking my mit dieser problem onmy home polish account od Wikpedia? Beno (talk) 06:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please tell me about me in the future not to do mistakes from placing files, what mistakes I made while shooting the car delorean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beno (talk • contribs) 06:30, 01 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

When I upload file another time, You delete it another time? Beno (talk) 03:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:120705-N-VF350-005 ear Admiral Ron Lloyd, Royal Canadian Navy, speaks with chaplains).jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

For future reference, when a Flickr image has an obviously incorrect tag, don't bother adding {{Flickrreview}}; the bot will only read the license tag and mark it for deletion. Instead, just add Category:Flickr images needing human review directly and include a small note (in <!-- --> tags, perhaps) explaining to the reviewer why bot review wouldn't work. I found this image while deleting pages that failed review, and this one was included because the bot didn't understand that US Navy pictures are PD-USGov. I've removed the bot's deletion request and replaced it with a review notice that confirms your tag. Nyttend (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, and if you wouldn't have used the template when uploading manually, you shouldn't hesitate to remove it when uploading with a tool. Nyttend (talk) 13:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tagging copyvios edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, When tagging copyvios, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gadget. See in your preferences. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 106.68.123.120 13:28, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for your improvements and hard work on images from the DoD.   Fæ (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Welcome, Dear Filemover! edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

 

Hi Gbawden, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 10:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, MCMLXXXIX 18:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your VFC installation method is deprecated edit

Hello Gbawden, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please do not rename any more images in Category:History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group; or if you must, do so like File:EWS28.05 - Professor Jack Fowler and Mr John Haggith.jpg, so that the sort order and origin is preserved. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:ALEXIS HERNANDEZ PARRANDA 1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I am dealing with an OTRS ticket about this file that you marked in March as being Sergio Montesino's work. Where have you found this information? Thank you --Ruthven (msg) 12:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • @Ruthven: I think i summarily tagged all this users uploads after finding one or two that were taken from the internet hence how I found the authors name. This was a batch edit and I worked on the premise that if there was an issue with one there was an issue with all, given that they were the only upload by this user. Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I arrived at the same conclusion after undeleting another file that was taken with a different camera and has a source on the web. I havent' found any Sergio Montesino as original author, but I asked for some explaination via OTRS. Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Categorization edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there, I noticed you added a bunch of files from the BCNDP Flickr stream to Category:John Horgan. However... a quick check on a few files show that this file and this file don't even have John Horgan in it, and other notable individuals unaccounted for. Would you be able to look back on the ones you did and try to account for the actual notable individuals in the photo? Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the Strive Masiyiwa image! edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@ GbawdenThank you for the Strive Masiyiwa image!Jakelewis2 (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Jakelewis2: My pleasure. Glad I could help Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Tim Gemmill selfie.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there. This file seems to have a valid OTRS permission so I'm wondering why you tagged it as "missing permission". De728631 (talk) 14:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Arroser edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. After your « no permission », please notice that this file is the same than https://www.cls.fr/contact/toutes-nos-coordonnees/. Must be deleted ? --Arroser (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC) @Arroser: Hi. yes it should. you can tag it as a copyvio. I tagged it as no permission as they gave a source for it but no evidence that they had permission to use it Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fotos Eliana Krawcyk edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

El correo electrónico con la autorización fue enviado oportunamente. Por favor eliminar esta plantilla.--NINASANTPL (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. Some suggestion edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, partner. I saw recently that you had just started a deletion request against a buffon who had been uploading files in order to vandalize Spanish Wikipedia. Well, can you add these new files uploaded by Adriaortegaparadeda?. Thanks. --Ravave (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC) P.S. Go and look for the administrators so they can block those guys, because they're screwing around.Reply

@Ravave: Done - you can nominate them yourselves next time - just hit the nominate for deletion button. Thanks for helping to clean up Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK, Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravave (talk • contribs) 07:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Original Barnstar
Hello you like porn LHWAY89 (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Brazilian Army General Mourao visits IADC May 24, 2017 (34771964831).jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Brazilian Army General Mourao visits IADC May 24, 2017 (34771964831).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paladinum2 (talk) 22:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sailor directs an EA-18G during snow storm in Japan (8367035559).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sailor directs an EA-18G during snow storm in Japan (8367035559).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

COM:A edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Gbawden,

Have you considered becoming an admin? You seem to have the qualifications to be one. -- 1989 (talk) 05:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@1989: - Dear 1989. Thanks for the message. I have been considering how I could get involved in other ways on Commons. Will definitely consider it. Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Shall I nominate you now? -- 1989 (talk) 06:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Also, see COM:BBL. -- 1989 (talk) 06:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Before you do that- what is the area you would like me to become involved in to help the project? I see my self helping with the files for deletion process and other cleanup tasks that might be necessary Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
You can help with whatever you like here (COM:AB). Also, be sure to add Babel so users can understand what languages you know. I linked it above. -- 1989 (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Done. You can nominate me. Gulp Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Just sign and you’re good. -- 1989 (talk) 08:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, Dear Administrator! edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

 
An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Gbawden, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 10:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Congratz and welcome to the world of hurt, combined with having all dignity removed. It's kinda funk, tho. Welome, and cheers!   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Hedwig in Washington: Thank you and thank you for the kind words of support of my nomination. Gulp what have I done :) Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations! Again, I missed your nomination. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Admin's Barnstar
You’re doing great on your first day on the job. Keep it up! 1989 (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Soldered wires edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi

could you please look at this image again? It's simply terrible, and does not show the purported subject of the image. I think it should have been closed as delete, but I can understand if you closed it on a policy basis. IN any case it does not belong here.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @ThatMontrealIP: When a File is in use, it is not eligible for deletion per COM:INUSE. When nominating images for deletion, be aware if its used on user pages or another Wikimedia project. 1989 (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Delete edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Please view the Commons:Deletion requests/File:DbNGRAWMe2c.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Facetune 24-01-2019-14-22-07.jpg.--NMW03 (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@NMW03: Done! Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

please upload file licence edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

please upload file licence until this file will be deleted File:Himanshu-Singh.jpg Himanshu Singh(boy) (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

this file is uncategory edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hello,this file is uncategory please clean up this flie:Himanshu Singh (1).jpg.deletion templete has removed please edit. Himanshu Singh(boy) (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

one file is uncategory edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

hii,one file is uncategory please clean this file:Himanshu Singh (1).jpg Himanshu Singh(boy) (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Himanshu Singh(boy): the file you mention is due to be deleted as personal photos are not meant to be on commons - see COM:NOT - Commons is not a photo album or webhost Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
This user is a sock of Singhhimanshu3344 and has been blocked accordingly. -- 1989 (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

All the works are mine which I have uploaded except two which have been deleted. I request you to remove deletion tags from other files. I request you to kindly look into it without biasness. Workmk (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @Workmk: The tags will be removed when the DR is over. If you are the author of the images, see COM:OTRS. -- 1989 (talk) 18:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Images edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, Please stop tagging files under F7, I'm not going to waste Dyolf77s time by asking for undeletion as I don't know how bad or salvageable the files were however we may of just lost valuable images due to your blind tagging so I would kindly ask you stop,
We need to save images here not delete them especially when like I say some could be salvageable. –Davey2010Talk 12:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Davey2010: Sorry wasn't my intention. Mea culpa Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
No worries, Some images can be cropped whilst others you can occasionally find the full image online so not all are immediately deletable,
Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 13:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Davey2010: I do my best to fix images by cropping them. Only non useful files are deleted. Happy editing! — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
User:Dyolf77 ah right sorry, unfortunately many admins don't do that - they'll see a tag and just delete the file, Ah well thanks for your help :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tiny fragment of map with only one place name.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I suppose you mean "Kept"? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Yann: . Yup. Sorry. Fixed. Will be more careful Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:TN Governor BillLee.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How is File:TN Governor BillLee.jpg in the public domain? The state of Tennessee doesn’t, nor have they ever, released their work in the public domain? It’s an official photo that is copyrighted. I’m just trying to figure out your rationale of removing the permission tag... I’ve listed it for deletion now, but would still like like to know your reasoning. Did you even check to see the copyright status? Corky 15:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC) @Corkythehornetfan: I visited tn.gov and tried to find a copyright statement which I couldn't. If I missed it please can you send me the url? Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:TnT PoS Westmoorings 1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Gbawden, hi Wdwd,
I noticed a few edits around file File:TnT PoS Westmoorings 1.jpg which I had asked to be deleted in this deletion request. I am aware that the "new" picture has a lower resolution than the "old" one, which is due to my limited software tools. The reason why I had asked to delete the "old" file was that I had corrected the horizon in the "new" file. Now the "new" file is deleted, and the "old" one still has its tilted horizon. Might be Commons policy, might be wrong, I don't know, just wanted to mention the reason behind my deletion request.
Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 11:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Grueslayer: Hi. I might have screwed up on that one. To be safe I kept the file and then tagged it as a Duplicate. As I pointed out it was a better image than the other and Wdwd seems to have agreed as he has kept this one and redirected the other. You could re-upload the new horizon image to the same file name by clicking upload a new version under file history. Hope that helps Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A goat for you! edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

for the goat

Markfree123 (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

See some photos, should these photos remain in wikimedia commons? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

@Gbawden, I am giving you some files which are not full of information, I mean they are lacking proper information, see:

  1. File:17 January 1951 - Ayub Khan assumes charge as CinC of the Pakistan Army.jpg
  2. File:Kaptai dam in East Pakistan being visited by Ayub Khan.jpg
  3. File:Lieutenant General Sir Frank Messervy.jpg
  4. File:Muhammed Ayub Khan 1940-41.jpg
  5. File:General Muhammad Musa Khan Hazara (1958–1966).jpg
  6. File:Yahya Khan as the Army C-in-C.jpg
  7. File:General Yahya Khan.jpg
  8. File:Sahabzada Yaqub Khan.jpg
  9. File:General Muhammad Musa Khan Hazara.jpg, this photo has been downloaded from here:http://www.pakarmymuseum.com/exhibits/general-muhammad-musa/ (click on the image you will see the full version)

See these photos carefully, do they meet the criteria of being public domains? have these photos are permitted to be published in Wikimedia commons? relevant authorship and publication details have not been provided in these photos. Shamsun N Tushar (talk) 03:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Hamsun N Tushar: I am very confused. What has this got to do with me?
@E4024: I have no idea what this is about. Do you? Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Not at all. (Let me be a goat if I have the faintest idea... :) --E4024 (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

can you upload my photo on wikipedia edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

can you upload my photo on wikipedia please give your whatsapp no. i send photo myself. Himanshusingh9641 (talk) 04:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Himanshusingh9641: You need to upload it yourself as long as you have the rights to do so. See COM:FS Gbawden (talk) 14:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Permission edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Loaded_Sista_at_Lorraine_TV_Show_Backstage.jpg&diff=339584566&oldid=316369131

Why? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Alexis Jazz: . Hi. The link to the permission page is dead and https://www.loadedsista.com/ clearly shows (C) at the bottom of the page Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
You don't trust Leoboudv? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gustavoluzsousa edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you please take a look? Reason for deletion was permission confirmation, not scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@EugeneZelenko: Hi Eugene. I think the deletion gadget screwed up. There were two deletion requests for this user - One was for a personal photo nominated by Les and the other yours. I kept the first one but it seems like the gadget marked your nom as kept too, which is not the case. If you click on a file you will see the nom is still open. I will try fix it manually Gbawden (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Undeletion Request of File:Shreedev Bhattarai.jpg and File:M-1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I had posted some pictures in wikimedia which you had deleted for copyright issues. I took time to request for undeletion to be sure that they are not copyrighted. So, here I am confirming you that , two of them do not subject to copyright violation. They are: File:Shreedev Bhattarai.jpg and File:M-1.jpg So, could you please undelete them? I request you to kindly look into it without biasness. SachuLolly (talk) 06:21, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@SachuLolly: Hi. Please post your request at COM:UDR. You will have to prove that you own the copyright as these photos were found elsewhere on the web Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Gbawden: I agree. But I am requesting for undeletion for only two of those files. Others, were found somewhere else on web. But, those two pictures I am mentioning, were taken by a professional photographers by the persons themselves. Do I still need to post my request at COM:UDR ? Please kindly answer that.SachuLolly (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@SachuLolly: If you want them undeleted then yes you need to post there. If they were taken by a professional photographer that photographer owns the copyright, not you. They will have to provide permission to use the photos via COM:OTRS. Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Gbawden: Thanks for the reply. No, since the photograph was taken as a paid service, they do not hold the copyright. It was taken and posted in social media, without any copyright by the persons in the photograph. In fact, they themselves provided me with the medias. Anyways, thanks for your time. SachuLolly (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Rishitha.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi - you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rishitha.jpg as delete, but the file still exists. Could you check this please? Thanks. O Still Small Voice of Clam 12:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jax schnauz.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please take a look since closure is contradicting. File claimed to be kept when summary tells deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Schmarsau Preussischer Rundsockelstein 2308-01.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you take a look at the rename request on File:Schmarsau Preussischer Rundsockelstein 2308-01.jpg? It proposes reversing your previous renaming, which needs an administrator for the overwrite anyway. --ghouston (talk) 21:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deletion request edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Can you delete this file and block Ramil Memmedov 92? See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Facetune 24-01-2019-14-22-07.jpg.--NMW03 (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@NMW03: I have tagged the file as G4 Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Question to a deletion request edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Hello Gbawden, can you delete this file? I have opened this deletion request 8 days ago and I think it can be deleted now because there is no disagreement! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:46, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Chem Sim 2001: Done Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Gbawden: Thanks a lot! I wish you a nice day! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Chem Sim 2001, Jeff G., and DMacks: That was not uncontroversial and you knew it. (feels like we should be discussing this on ANU.. Jeff, DMacks?)- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Alexis Jazz: Hi. I took a look at the DR and it appeared to be an uncontroversial duplicate. Did I miss something? Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
The other DR I linked seems very similar and Chem Sim 2001 has been canvassing. He asked you here to close the DR not because it would be uncontroversial, but to make sure it would be closed before Jeff would find the DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:33, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Alexis Jazz: Uhm no ... I started this deletion request eight days ago. If you don´t know, the request has to be active for seven days. After that - if there is no disagreement or criticism - it can be deleted by an administrator. I had also linked this deletion request here: Commons:WikiProject Chemistry/Deletion requests. Please don´t assume anything to me! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

FBMD edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Closing admin question: File:Jessica may.jpg just passed Flickr review. It has FBMD at MD. How do we separate files to delete or not as regards "FBMD at MD"? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@E4024: I saw a post about FMDB saying that its not always accurate (will look for it) and there is something else to look for. In this case it passed flickr review - maybe a case of flickrwashing? I don't recall the DR for this one10:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I wanted to take an opinion before making a cat for her but got bored of waiting and made it. Now let us leave her alone some time. :) --E4024 (talk) 12:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@E4024: The Flickr user just signed up. Keep in mind the reviews are approved by a bot, so the reviews is not always accurate to recognize Flickrwashing. -- 1989 (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
You see, I told you I do not have the dough (a Turkish saying) to be an admin; but you have not read my mail yet. (You did not take the "message" in my previous talk either. :) --E4024 (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Lacking in specific skill doesn’t mean you’re not fit to be one. I’m aware of your situation, I’ve read it all. -- 1989 (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Question edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Un F-16 pakistaní derriba un MiG-23 soviético.jpg appears to be a re-upload of a file which you deleted [Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Byfrosts venezolano here]. If it is a re-upload, you may want to take action.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Nigel Ish: Done! Thanks Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ampiroxicam 3D black ball.png edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Gbawden, can you please check this Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ampiroxicam 3D black ball.png, I think the file can be deleted now after 7 days! Thanks, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File talk:Karl Nehammer.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't think this fall under COM:CSD#8, because this was a discussion, that was linked, to understand the case, so it isn't an orphan page. Habitator terrae 🌍 10:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Habitator terrae: I take your point that discussions took place there but when the original file was deleted the deletion "orphaned" the talk page and you can't have a talk page without a file so you have to delete the talk page too Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

blue1310.com edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Gbawden, I've taken the liberty to remove your copyvio-tag from some images with a blue1310.com watermark, as the legal code of blue1310.com mentions "Jean-Sébastien Touchet" as author/owner. I hope that's ok for you. As the uploading account-name is "Touchet Jean-Sébastien", it's rather likely that they are the same person. --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Undelete please edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

An OTRS ticket has arrived for File:Hendrik_Jan_L_Ankersmit_2019.jpg. Can you please restore it so I can verify the image? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ww2censor: . Done. Might be best to post on COM:UDR next time Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I normally ask the deleting admin to restore their own deletions instead of cluttering up COM:UDR with uncontroversial requests. You are the first to make that suggestion. Do you think that would be a quicker way to go? Ww2censor (talk) 12:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Ww2censor: You are welcome to ping me but if I don't respond in time UDR might be quicker Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Wild_Karnataka_Cover.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi This specific image is taken by User:Amoghavarsha is a director of this documentary. Please see this IMDB link. The reference you have shared is a news portal and doesn't carry the copyright. ~ Omshivaprakash /talk/Contributions 20:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

You can also read more about [en:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoghavarsha_JS Amoghavarsha]] here. ~ Omshivaprakash /talk/Contributions 20:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Omshivaprakash: The person who took the photo must upload it to Commons and release it under a free license - please read COM:L. In this case there was enough doubt about the provenance of this image to justify deletion under the precautionary principle Gbawden (talk) 05:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Apollo by Giovanni Antonio Pellegrini Mauritshuis 1135.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please, before replacing or deleting files, verify information of new files. In this case were lost translations of title and infos about medium, dimensions and institution. This is are more important than number of pixels!!!--Zanekost (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Zanekost: I don't recall the image you are referring to but it is likely I processed a duplicate which was tagged by another user. If this is the case simply upload a higher quality version. All my edits are done in good faith Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Undelete Deleted Photo edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Gbawden;

This file:   has Licence CC 4.0. Reference: https://ias1.larioja.org/cex/sistemas/cmu/v3/consultaRecursoFicha.jsp?idSesionVirtual=7124a497c1ff0be9e842530567cd6b4ed5e8a254&f_intervalo=T&f_etiqueta=&f_calidades=-Imagen-&NPRE10020=&NPRE10030=&NPRE10040_SEP=,&NPRE10050=&NPRE10080=01/01/2015&NPRE10080_2=30/01/2017&NPRE10150=&NPRE10160=CC4.0&E050100=&dccobe=&dcocur=&dcocup=1&fichero=NPRE10&kint=NPRE10010&tarea=&modelo=P010&nfoto=&modoGestion=A&avanzada=NPRE10080%7CNPRE10080_2%7CNPRE10160&lMediaSel=L0210&cobes=467621&nhref=0

So, I request to be restored, please.

Thanks, regards

--Wikitcher (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Wikitcher: I cannot resolve that URL - Pagina Error Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Gbawden: https://ias1.larioja.org/cex/sistemas/cmu/v3/consultaRecursoFicha.jsp?ltcnx=L0210&id=ay8O6sZcSoo%3D

I have seen that you had restored the file and then it has been deleted again. I insist that it´s an image of the 'multimedia files' of the Government of La Rioja, which as you can see in the link I have provided before, has a license CC4.0. Reference: https://ias1.larioja.org/cex/sistemas/cmu/v3/consultaRecursoFicha.jsp?ltcnx=L0210&id=ay8O6sZcSoo%3D

Thanks, regards --Wikitcher (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I undeleted to check what made me delete the file in the first place and I undeleted it again, pending a decision by a non involved editor here Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Gbawden: I suppose it was an error of mine not to refer to the main source of the multimedia file repository web but to another page web, giving an interpretation error. I hope it is resolved soon. Thank you. regards
@Wikitcher: As you will see I commented on your Undeletion request - best to let someone else review and make the final undeletion decision Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gbawden/Archive_1&oldid=346715778"
Return to the user page of "Gbawden/Archive 1".