User talk:Krd/archive/2019

Einfach danke

Hallo Krd, einmal ein großes Danke für die ewige Nachputzerei, die sich so im Lauf der Zeit ergibt, ein Tippfehler hier oder ein Übersetzungsfehler dort und noch OTRS Hilfe. Danach noch einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr. lg K@rl (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

account creator

Hi Krd,

May I have access to the right mentioned above? I am active on moving files and I usually run into a ratelimit as I use a script to mass rename files. -- 1989 (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Done for one year, feel free to request renewal when required. --Krd 17:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Vasif (given name)

Hi. Can you please bring back Category talk:Vasif (given name) that you deleted? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 20:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/RonBot 2

Thank You for approval, and can I have my bot flag added? Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I though the bot was already flagged. Done now. --Krd 07:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Stema e Gjakovës.jpg

File:Stema e Gjakovës.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kj1595 (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned talk page

Could you please restore this talk page as it is no longer orphaned? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 16:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Some stuff from 2018

Hello.
Unfortunately some old stuff in our happy new year. Can you please extract and save technical data from this thing under this request? The only action of the account is due to expire in few days, if not hours, whereas en.Wikipedia linked this account (both technically and behaviourally) to other accounts in the sock ring. If not done in time, we could lose a piece of evidence on structure of the ring. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Is there any more detail/evidence you can provide? --Krd 11:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

KrdBot

Hi! Can you adapt the layout of messages posted by your bot on deletion pages so it fit with the layout used by OTRS gadget? See example. Mentioning the file name can be useful. Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

I can adapt the layout, but I prefer to add one line per ticket, not one line per file. Do you agree? --Krd 16:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes, no problem but I think it's important to mention name(s) of the file(s) in the edit. Some DR are about different files and we may receive permission only for one file.

Btw, nice job with the bot to tag files which received permission email! Is it recent? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of image

Can you give me a link to the reasoning for deleting File:Jean_Paul_Garraud.jpg, please? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 09:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Please see: File:Jean-Paul Garraud.jpg --Krd 11:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mitino O2

Could you please process the deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mitino O2. OTRS client initially asked to undelete files confirming all rights but after discussing another ticket and answers to my questions he doubted the previous one and asked to delete these files. I asked administrators for speedy deletion but instead the regular discussion was opened. And now I keep both tickets open to resolve this seemingly simple situation. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 11:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Otrs-permissions-l

Can I be unsubscribed from here? It's telling me I need approval for some reason. This didn't happen before. -- 1989 (talk) 12:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Mailing list membership is considered mandatory to stay up to date with discussions. --Krd 12:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

May I ask why was I given AC temporarily? -- 1989 (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Is there any specific problem with that? As said we can of course renew this at any time. --Krd 09:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

About the share-alike license

Hello, Mr. Krd. If one studio added these words "grants the right to use any of our images (Content) to freely copy, distribute, and create derivate works without any written permission from us. The license is similar to share-alike license where all derivative products must inherit the same rights as Content and no new restrictions can be added to those works." on its website, could I share its photo directly through Commons under CC-BY-SA 3.0 ? -- 14.0.164.246 14:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC) (Newbie)

No. The studio shall release the file under CC-BY-SA 3.0. If they have reasons not to do so, we have the same reasons not to accept the file. --Krd 15:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Fotos von Gerfried Pongratz

Hallo Krd, kannst du mir da dabei helfen, die Fotos unter Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gerfried Pongratz sind allesamt aus dem Familienbesitz von Gerfried Pongratz, so war Josef rainer sein Großvater und Leo Reinisch ein Großonkel, dei Medaille und Dokumente sind 100 Jahre alt, also was soll diese Löscherei von einem User, dem man das leider auf deutsch nicht klar machen kann. Oder sollen die Fotos von Pongratz, die er wikipedia schenken will - schließlich haben wir von Politikern aus dieser Zeit nicht wirklich viele Fotos - wirklich weggschmissen werden. Manches versteh ich nicht ganz, aber v ielleicht kannst du da helfen. danke K@rl (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Wer ist der Fotograf, der die Fotos aufgenommen hat? --Krd 15:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Der Vater von Pongratz, er hat vor einer Stunde ein OTRS Mail mit allen betroffenenen Dateinamen an euch geschickt. danke K@rl (talk) 09:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

PicMonkies

Hi again. You closed Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Marquis de la Eirron, but the user "PicMonkies", verified as related to a couple other accounts, is not blocked as of date. Can nothing be done about this? George Ho (talk) 00:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello. What block reason do you suggest regarding user PicMonkies? To be honest, I currently don't see any that will survive any appeal. --Krd 07:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

If those accounts are not enough, how about others: Crimm432, PlediasvonHma, FinalXFantasy, and Yome123? Or must I create a new request again about the accounts? George Ho (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes please, the ongoing information should be in the CU request, not on a personal talk page. --Krd 08:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

undo revision 336871964 by Gbawden

Hi. You undid one of my edits. Did I do something wrong? Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Please see revision history of the deletion request. --Krd 08:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

My bad. Thanks Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Requests for checkuser

Hi! Please. --Микола Василечко (talk) 22:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

The latest RfA

I suppose that you have protected Commons:Administrators/Requests instead of Commons:Administrators/Requests/1989 (2). --jdx ^Re: 08:50, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

You're right, thank you for the notice. Has already been corrected by 1989. --Krd 08:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Maximilien II de Béthune, Prince d'Henrichemont.JPG

hi Krd, I am writing to ask you if you can restore this ancient portrait of an unknown artist in the seventeenth century???--95.244.103.144 21:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Tegan Marie.jpeg

Hi Krd, I saw that you delete the file Tegan Marie.jpeg due to insufficient permission for use on Commons and Copyright violation. I asked the copyright holder to use the email template generator (https://tools.wmflabs.org/relgen/) to generate a text and to send this in to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in order for me to upload the picture here. Did you not found an email from the copyright holder or was there something missing about the email that was sent? I'm currently writing an article about her (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tegan_Marie) and would like to use the image. --Heubergen (talk) 10:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

The ticket is still open. --Krd 13:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but can you please explain what that means for the image? Will somebody restore it once the issue is resolved or is there anything I can do to speed up to process? --Heubergen (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Somebody will restore it once the issue is resolved. --Krd 06:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Why did you rollback?

Hi Krd, I saw you rolled back my edit on the Relief Map of Brazil, where some troll in French nominated it for deletion. That map is used in thousands of articles on the wiki and clearly not a serious motivated deletion request. Is there no policy against such trolling affecting thousands of articles with one trolling click? Tisquesusa (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear Tisquesusa, you'd have to either remove the deletion request completely, or comment accordingly so that an admin can do it for you. Just blanking the deletion request page doesn't resolve any problem. --Krd 15:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Requesting for your kind assistance

Hi Krd! Firstly, thank you for processing ticket #2019021210000652 for the File:HOFELE Design C-Class.jpg. May I kindly request that the other photos of Hofele-Design (File:HOFELE-Design factory in Donzdorf.png; File:Michael and Martin Hofele.jpg; and File:Carl Hofele.png) be processed as well with ticket #2018081610003302. Your assistance is highly appreciated. Have a nice day. Wiki mih (talk) 01:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

OTRS members

• Revision of User:Ezarate
• Revision of User:Dogad75

I hope that some day—not necessarily on this occasion—you will run into a major trouble with your despicable habit not to provide edit summaries with edits, even substantial edits. It seems that you generally provide as little explanation as the regime can tolerate given your current position. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear Incnis Mrsi, the reasons are covered by WP:ANON, thank you for your understanding. --Krd 09:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

2x closes

Thanks for cleaning these up -- I'm not quite back in the saddle here, and I forgot then when editing recent DRs you have to check frequently to see that someone else is not doing the same ones. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

No problem at all, just needs to be cleaned up to satisfy the archive bot. --Krd 11:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Delay numbers at Commons:OTRS/backlog

Hi,
I see you as the main supervisor of Commons:OTRS/backlog, which is a part of Template:OTRS pending/backlog and it defines the behavior of Template:OTRS pending.
The question arose from this discussion at ru-wiki in the aspect of how "official" the current number is. Besause it is claimed that the real delay is "200+ дней" (200+ days).

Overall my question is if it is possible/happens that a content with a provided OTRS ticket and {{OTRS pending}} would be deleted not because of a bad/dubious permission, but only because the OTRS ticked could not reviewed on time? If it is possible, then is this time directly dependent on Commons:OTRS/backlog data? --NeoLexx (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

The data in Commons:OTRS/backlog in created from th permissions-commons queue only, so it mostly affects tickets in English. It may be that the backlog in other languages is longer.

All tickets that have the files specified in the permissions e-mail in a machine readable way will automatically converted to OTRS-received by Krdbot, so I don't see any reason to keep files with OTRS-pending longer than currently. --Krd 14:23, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt answer. I dare to ask a few more questions:

• Is this possible to know from somewhere the exact backlog in Russian and its dynamics (similar to English)?

• If I understand correctly, {{OTRS pending}} is attached only to {{OTRS pending/backlog}} for its behavior switch thus only your numbers are important. Irrespectively to what country contributors are, what language do they speak and what language do they choose for OTRS-letter — the red banner "No OTRS permission since" gets placed on their contributions based on your information only.
So backlogs in other languages have only theoretical but not practical value (obviously I am talking only in respect of OTRS-pending contributions, not about the OTRS team work as such). Do I understand the mechanics properly?

• "I don't see any reason to keep files with OTRS-pending longer than currently" - 1) does it mean that in case of a machine readable form of the provided permission the contribution may be deleted only in case of a wrong / false / dubious permission — but not just because the OTRS team did not manage to review the permission in the indicated by you amount of days?
2) does it mean that in case of a non-machine readable form of the provided permission the contribution may be deleted just because the OTRS team did not manage to review the permission in the indicated by you amount of days?

Sorry if asking too many question but I see it as very important to know for all current and potentional contributors over the OTRS system. --NeoLexx (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

1. Tickets that have OTRS-received will likely get looked into by the patrolling admin and perhaps kept. On the other hand, anybody could say OTRS-pending and we don't even know if anything is sent at all, so files without permission should not be kept longer just because we have an backlog.

2. We can also create the numbers for other queues. Not a so big deal. But we should in any case not start to manage the backlog, but manage the tickets. If you think you are qualified, please apply today. If you know anybody, please encourage them to apply. --Krd 18:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Permission for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg

Hi, kindly check the email for OTRS Permission for image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg. --Vrisle (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stay patient. Thank you. --Krd 08:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding OTRS permission

Hello Krd, I had applied for an OTRS permission via mail. Would you plz check and assist? Ticket link is here. Thank you.--Gpkp (talk) 19:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Please resend the permission from an e-mail address that accepts replies. --Krd 13:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Krd, we have resent the permission mail from the same email-id (once after fixing the dns-zone issue which caused mail bounce). Request you to check. Thank you. (pinging JJMC89)
--Gpkp (talk) 16:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

About OTRS permission for Francesco Lotoro.jpg image

Hello, i received on this page (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Lotoro#/media/File:Francesco_Lotoro.jpg) an OTRS notification that says to contact a volunteer who owns an OTRS account. In the notification they talk about an email that is waiting to be managed, and i believe it be the email I sent for the verification of my identity as the Author of the image "Francesco Lotoro.jpg". Please, can you do something to help me? The image is related with the wikipedia page on Francesco Lotoro (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Lotoro). Thank you User:Pino Marchisella 00:29, 02 March 2019 (CET)

Please stay patient. Thank you. --Krd 13:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Krd thanks for your excelent job!, blessings to you ^^ Migueldedios01 (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding File:Ian Schlakman.jpg

First of all I would thank you for your guidance on dealing OTRS. Recently, someone raised an issue about possible violation of COM:PCP about File:Schlakman President Logo.jpg on COM:VPC#File:Schlakman President Logo.jpg may have wrong license. After some investigation, File:Ian Schlakman.jpg may also be affected by this issue. However, you marked this as a pass. Would you explain your opinion on the discussion thread there? Thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 13:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Bot flag for DB111Bot?

Thank you for approving this bot request, could you also grant the bot flag please? --DB111 (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Done now. Sorry. --Krd 13:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --DB111 (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

TV infringes your copyright

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veWrZORhafo uses as image preview your photo File:Ruhr Reggae Summer Mülheim 2014 Anthony B 08.jpg with the mere addition of a word "Trending". Please take it down! https://www.youtube.com/copyright_complaint_form Nemo 10:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Done, thank you for the notice! --Krd 06:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Request

Could you please delete Andesfællesskabet? User:Saederup92 translated the title and nothing else and has left it for ten days now. It's in the list at New Page Patrol which I keep an eye on and since I am not a translation admin, I can't do anything about it. Thanks, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Oops. I seem to have forgotten about it for a while. I apologise for that. Saederup92 (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Saederup92, that's true, but since galleries should have very little text -- not more than one sentence -- a translation is probably not necessary and this one is out of scope as it stands. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: The page appears as red link. Is this already resolved? --Krd 16:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Sorry no -- it's weird. The page title on the page is Andesfællesskabet, but to get there you must use Andean Community/da. I didn't know that was possible -- as far as I can see, it is not a redirect. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure if that's ok but I have simply deleted that page. Please check if everything looks good now. --Krd 06:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. As I said above, it's not clear that translations of galleries are useful -- they typically have only one sentence and that can be handled easily on a single page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:25, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Another request to check OTRS user activity

Hi, I'm sorry to bother you again but I feel that this issue should be looked into. A while ago I asked if it would be possible to check whether or not OTRS user Para was still active, and you said that there are semiautomatic checks so everything should be fine. To my knowledge we are now in such a situation in the Finnish WP that we have only two users with access to permissions-fi. One of them is an admin, but he's a very new OTRS user and I haven't noticed him solving any tickets yet, at least publically. The other user is Para, who hasn't edited the Finnish WP since 2016 or any other projects in a long time, so it doesn't seem likely that they're involved in OTRS anymore either. Would it be possible to check whether Para's access to the queues is appropriate at this time? We recently lost an experienced OTRS user and if the admin hadn't requested access around the same time, I believe that Para would've been the only Finnish user with access to the permissions queue. -kyykaarme (talk) 08:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Dear Kyykaarme. OTRS inactivity is defined as having not handled any tickets in the last 6 months in any queue. We cannot force agents to be active in specific queues they have access to, and removing agents isn't any solution to get tickets done. If there are qualified candidates, please encourage them to apply for OTRS access. --Krd 09:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the reply. Would you have advice on what our options are if the new OTRS user quits, can the permissions-fi queue be closed if that happens? Hopefully that won't happen, but if it does, there will be nobody answering the tickets. The community has been aware of the OTRS user shortage for about a year but nobody else has volunteered. -kyykaarme (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

The queue will no be closed quickly when there is no agent. But of course the tickets will no longer be answered, so this is a thing that should not happen. --Krd 05:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2019031810004396

Hi, could you have another look at this ticket? I cannot access this ticket, but the author is stated to have died 1932/1933, so that copyright should not be an issue. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

The customer claims he has modified the maps in a relevant way. --Krd 15:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

And did they show the original and the modified version to show this? I think the claim is likely to be made up. User Mritz has been trolling with these and other files for a while, see Special:Contributions/Mritz. That's why some files were already on my watch list. Jcb (talk) 15:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I have no reason for any doubt, but if you have any, feel free to take the issue. --Krd 15:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I would at least like to have a look at the ticket. Can you move it to a permissions queue? Jcb (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I have moved it to the Commons queue now. --Krd 15:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

File replace

Hi, I've seen you're active just now. Could you please take this request?

• move File:Guida alle costellazioni 1.2a.pdf to File:Guida alle costellazioni 1.2.pdf overwriting the last one.
• suppress the redirect.

Thank you! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 09:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 09:08, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. :) --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 09:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmation

Hello, just to confirm that it was me. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 06:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

I messed up an upload  :(

Hi! I just realized that i messed an upload. In this category every file is duplicated. Anything i can do to help deleting the duplicates, just let know. Thanks, and sorry! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 02:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Done. I hope none of the second half was in use. --Krd 05:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

mediainfo - Dateiinformationen

Hallo Krd,

für https://w.wiki/4iz wollte ich die "Dateiinformationen" ergänzen. Die Änderung lässt sich aber nicht veröffentlichen. (Ich klicke auf "Änderung veröffentlichen" aber es passiert nichts: keine Fehlermeldung. Beim Verlassen der Seite werde ich aber gefragt, ob ich die Änderung verwerfen möchte.) Das ist mir auch schon bei andere Mediendatein passiert.

Anderseits konnte ich die Änderung der "Dateiinformationen" für https://w.wiki/4ga problemlos veröffentlichen.

Hast Du eine Idee woran das liegen könnte bzw. könntest Du das bitte weitergeben.

Viele Grüße

--Molgreen (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe keine spontane Idee. Kannst Du einen Screenshot davon per mail schicken? --Krd 21:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Beim Erstellen der Screenshots ist mir aufgefallen, dass das Problem browserabhängig ist:

• mit dem Firefox kann ich Änderungen der "Dataiinformationen" veröffentlichen

• mit dem Internet Explorer kann ich Änderungen der "Dataiinformationen" nicht veröffentlichen

Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich hab leider auch keine Idee, an wen Du Dich damit wenden könntest. Ich empfehle, User:Raymond darauf anzusprechen. --Krd 06:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Krd, danke für den Tipp. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 14:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:31, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

BergerTeam

I noticed you tagged File:Akrika-Sonne-Sun-Africa.jpg with an OTRS permission template. Does that also cover Special:ListFiles/BergerTeam or should these files be tagged as missing permission? Multichill (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

The permission is only for the single file. --Krd 06:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Ritratto di Margherita di Savoia 01.png

hi Mr. Krd, I am writing to ask you to restore this scanned portrait of the XVIIth Century. the following artist who executed the painting is unknown--NNEPEL12 (talk) 10:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

What is the evidence that the portrait is created in the XVII. century? --Krd 10:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

is a scanned image from a magazine, it is obvious that in the 17th century the following character lived in that period, if it had been in the 18th century, the style of painting would have been completely different, however it is a scanned image. for copyright it should definitely not be a hindrance since it is a portrait where the following artist has been dead for more than a century. it would be possible to restore the following file that you deleted???--NNEPEL12 (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm not going to restore it as I see no evidence that the image is from a previous century. Feel free to request at COM:UNDEL. --Krd 09:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

thank you for your availability, then I will make your name then in the request--NNEPEL12 (talk) 11:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

OTRS ticket:2019071010002431

Hi! I hope you didn't mind me taking care of above-mentioned ticket, referring to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Susan_och_Mats_Billmark.jpg . Hannibal asked me as an OTRS agent to help him and the photographer Camilla Norman getting the license procedure correct. Perhaps you could even transfer the ticket to permissions-sv@wikimedia.org? This was the queue it ought to have been sent to in the first place (and then the ticket archival could be duly done). All the best.--Paracel63 (talk) 13:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

The ticket is already done. --Krd 13:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks in your help and swift reply to the license holder. I was a bit quick in my permission acknowledgment, not having replying access to a locked ticket. All the best. :-)--Paracel63 (talk) 13:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

You can always assign tickets to yourself when they appear abandoned. Although, no offense, but I don't understand what going on today, as you are no the first one who likes to have a ticket closed in the same hour, while we have a general backlog of a year or so. Please consider to handle one or another of the remaining tickets. --Krd 13:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I have little time for OTRS, unfortunately, but I'm active on the Swedish queue. My experience with deleted files due to unanswered tickets has made me prioritise to at least keep up with the local queue. :-)--Paracel63 (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Krd, for the quick response. I posted the wrong link, and will be more thorough in the future. Best wishes//Hannibal (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

OTRS

I am waiting for answers. --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2018121810007261

Hi, please see here. I have undeleted the files and added a list to the ticket. Could you have a look at the ticket to see if these files can be accepted? Jcb (talk) 13:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 08:07, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:07, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins-data.js

Hi Krd, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins-data.js. Thank you for caring about Wikimedia Commons's javascript pages.
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 9 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine.

1. ISSUE: line 146 character 8: Expected ':' and instead saw '...'. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
2. ISSUE: line 146 character 17: Expected '}' to match '{' from line 1 and instead saw 'sua'. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
3. ISSUE: line 146 character 21: Expected ')' and instead saw 'meravigliosa'. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
4. ISSUE: line 146 character 33: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
5. ISSUE: line 146 character 34: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
6. ISSUE: line 146 character 38: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
7. ISSUE: line 146 character 39: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
8. ISSUE: line 146 character 41: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],
9. ISSUE: line 146 character 41: Expected '(end)' and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: "" ...Nella sua meravigliosa Luce "": ["Image-reviewer"],

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC).

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins-data.js

Hi Krd, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins-data.js. Thank you for caring about Wikimedia Commons's javascript pages.
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine.

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 146 column 5: Unexpected token .

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC).

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Re:

hi krd, I received your message regarding the copyright of the file, and if you say that the information regarding the site only sufficient according to the Italian law concerning copyright, the author is unknown and the date is present, I do not see any problem inherent--Thomas Wiłsreale (talk) 17:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Dear Thomas Wiłsreale. At the file page you say that the author is unknown but at the same time they died 100 years ago or longer. Please explain the reasons for that assumption. --Krd 17:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I just solved the problem, I messed up with the licenses--Thomas Wiłsreale (talk) 17:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

ok. --Krd 17:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

OTRS

Hallo Krd, Du hast netterweise am 14. Mai 2019 die OTRS-Tickets 2019020310002613 für File:La Orotava San Agustín Organ.JPG und File:Tacoronte Iglesia de Santa Catalina Organ.JPG bearbeitet. Möglicherweise ist Dir dabei das dritte Bild File:La Victoria de Acentejo Iglesia Nuestra Señora Organ.JPG entgangen. Könntest Du das überprüfen? Dank und Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Bzgl. der dritten Datei ist das Ticket noch offen. --Krd 07:31, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Gerade das wundert mich. Ich habe eine Kopie der Mail, in der alle drei Bilder in einem Rutsch beantragt wurden. Von daher kann nicht sein, dass noch ein Teil offen ist. Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:MBCFlogo.jpg

Is the copyright to the logo indeed owned personally by the Wikimedia account operator? Ankry (talk) 07:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

I cannot answer your question, but the logo has OTRS permission. --Krd 07:42, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Freigut (Zürich) Salon erster Stock.jpg

Hallo Krd. Kürzlich wurde genanntes Bild gelöscht. Das erstaunt mich sehr, wurde doch die Einwilligung durch die Rechteinhaberin – unter Beifügung des Nachweises, dass sie die Rechteinhaberin ist – vor meinen Augen abgeschickt. Was ist da los? Gruss, --Freigut (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Der Vorgang ist noch offen, es gibt zur Zeit einen größeren Rückstau. --Krd 18:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Dann hätte man das Bild aber nicht löschen dürfen. --Freigut (talk) 16:42, 14 July 2019 (UTC) – Kann das Bild bitte wieder hergestellt werden? --Freigut (talk) 10:07, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Freigut (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

FYI

You deleted a lot of redirects today that should not have been deleted. Please take care in the future to make sure that the target was not deleted accidentally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magog the Ogre (talk • contribs) 22:13, July 16, 2019‎ (UTC)

I restored about half of them, but it takes a while because we have to go through each by hand and determine which versions should be undeleted. I'd appreciate if you could get the rest. I can handle protections later through an automated script. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Done, sorry for the trouble! --Krd 05:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Beta admin

I created the account User:Morgankevinj on the beta cluster can I have admin rights on there. I need to do tests on the abuse filter. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 13:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 14:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Bot sends unresolved DR to archive

Hi! There were two requests on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by David290 filed on 20 and 30 March. After Gbawden closed the first, the bot archived the second one as well: special:diff/347337492, resulting in no participation from other users.--Roy17 (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

At the time the request was archived, all entries were closed. --Krd 16:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:結佳梨Yukari JK 01.jpg

Hi Krd,

It seems that you have removed parts of the {{Delete}} on these pages. Are you closing the DR? -Mys_721tx (talk) 10:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

I have closed that now as kept. --Krd 11:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

The reasons for the DR is two-fold. Those images are not within the project scope and the ticket does not come from the photographer or the studio. A pervious ticket (ticket:2019073110005317) has shown that the uploader is not the photographer. The DR should be re-opened. -Mys_721tx (talk) 12:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Of course I missed that and have now reverted and commented accordingly. I agree that scope can be questioned. --Krd 12:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

And, again, thanks for the note! Even the removal of the DR was incomplete, so nearly everything went for in this ticket handling. I have now improved my toolset accordingly. --Krd 15:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Permanent account creator right

Hi Krd. Thank you for granting me the said right for 1 year! As I will be proceeding to further cleanup files that are already on commons, such as recategorising. I'll also being requesting DRs for newly uploaded files at the same time too. Could you perm me instead as it might take a long while to get things sorted. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

The are 2 weeks elapsed and 50 weeks left. I honestly cannot see why this is important at the current time. --Krd 05:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Alright. I’ll let you know if I still need the right when time comes. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Bild Klarinetten

Hallo Krd,

du hast gestern einen Eintrag auf meiner Diskussionsseite gemacht (neue Bilder nur mit neuem Namen). Dazu folgendes: Es gibt seit dem 3.8.2019 ein Bild mit 7 Klarinetten und einem Logo des Herstellers Wurlitzer. Ein anderer Benutzer hat daraus das Logo ausgeschnitten und das neue Foto "Klarinetten von Herbert Wurlitzer 2.jpg" genannt. Er nennt dieses einen Ausschnitt aus dem ersten. Genauso könnte man das Logo für sich (als Ausschnitt) einstellen, nur habe ich keine Ahnung, wie das geht. Ich hatte das versucht und als aktualisiertes Bild "Klarinetten von Herbert Wurlitzer 2.jpg" hochgeladen, und zwar einmal in weiß einmal in blau. Beide hast du gelöscht, da sie einen amnderen Namen haben müssten. Aber genau das gelingt mir nicht. Könntest du vielleicht das zuerst hochgeladene Bild mit dem weißen Logo, das genau so in dem Ursprungsbild enthalten ist, unter einem anderen Namen, z. B. Logo-Wurlitzer.jpg, wiederherstellen?

Vielen Dank im Voraus! --Gisel (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Gisel. Man kann das Logo dort sicher ausschneiden, es muss aber unter einem anderen Dateinamen hochgeladen werden, so dass es die ursprüngliche Datei nicht überschreibt. Es wäre gut wenn Du das selbst machen könntest, ich komme in den nächsten Tagen nicht dazu. --Krd 10:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File talk:Man protesting Hong Kong's extradition law in Pacific Place 20190615.png

Schönen guten Abend. Zu deiner Information: Ich habe diese Diskussionsseite vorläufig wiederhergestellt, da eine laufende Löschprüfung auf den Eintrag dort verweist. De728631 (talk) 20:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Ich weiß zwar nicht genau, wozu man dafür die Diskussionsseite braucht, aber ich hab auch nichts dagegen. --Krd 10:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your comments please

With regards to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AustralianJasmine and your restoration of these files. These were validly deleted as being out of scope of the project and the DR had nothing to do with their licensing. They are unused images of someone who has made no other contribution to this or any other Wikimedia project. As such they are actually deletable speedily (F10). I would appreciate your comments before I take further action. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello. The images are related to en:Draft:Gary Goh, so could be considered to be virtually in use. It would of course be within policy to delete them, but I'm not sure if even more work should be spent on that issue. --Krd 07:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the response and the information. Strangely they are not using photos on that article... --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Input on a ticket at otrs

Hi Krd, Could you please have a look at this Ticket:2019082710001523 I have put it up on lists.wikimedia but could really use your input. Thank you FitIndia ^{✉ बात} 06:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I left a note in the ticket. --Krd 06:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. FitIndia ^{✉ बात} 06:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Request lift block!

Hello sir !

I have opened my account from my friend's phone in order to send you. This means that I will not be able to speak again until I lift my ban and the IP address below. ‪2A03:2880:0:0:0:0:0:0/32‬ Thanks Railgun M3 (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Please contact info-commons@wikimedia.org by e-mail. --Krd 08:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Washing the Step-saver.jpg deleted?

Hi, Krd. Did you ever look at the request at User_talk:Jcb/archive/25#Washing_the_Step-saver.jpg_deleted? -Jeff the quiet (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

No. I have disabled ping globally as I receive too many unreasonable pings. I anybody likes anything, please make the effort to contact me directly. --Krd 08:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: , it looks like Krd has resolved the OTRS matter, though I can't view ticket:2018111310001107. Can you undelete the file now? -Jeff the quiet (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

If Krd thinks they should act because of the ticket, they will do. Krd can undelete files as much as I can. But apparently they didn't see a reason for undeletion. Jcb (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Krd/archive/2019,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Jonah Shacknai OTRS

Hey Krd, the copyright information for the photos of Jonah Shacknai that you worked on from OTRS is inaccurate:

• File:Photo_of_Jonah_Shacknai_2019.jpg
• File:Photo_of_Jonah_Shacknai,_CEO_of_Illustris_Pharmaceuticals.jpg

It says the photos are "Own Work" of a user with the same name as the subject, Jonah Shacknai. I can't tell if your OTRS confirmation was correspondence with Jonah Shacknai himself, or the photographer (I'm guessing Brian Ach, based on similar photos with the same camera serial). Do you think you could respond here or at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Jonah_Shacknai_Headshot? -- Elephanthunter (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

This is fixed now. --Krd 06:11, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Krd/archive/2019,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:32, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments

I'm sorry, I did not realize that you had disabled pings. Your comments would be welcome at COM:ON#Jonah Shacknai Headshot and concerning Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2019#File:Rob Møhlmann Poster-20e-ORT-2018-A3.jpg and Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-05#File:1800Legionflag.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Ok. I will ignore those already archived. --Krd 11:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Warhammer AoS Lind.jpg

Hi Krd. I saw you closed this cause the licensing was verified by OTRS. That's fine, but I'm wondering whether the actual emails sent to OTRS (including contact information) should've even been added to the discussion (and also COM:OTRSN#Games Workshop). It seems inappropriate for someone other than the person who sent the email or OTRS to be making its contents public (even if done in good faith). Now that the DR has been resolved, it might be best to remove that from the those two pages since it seems the correspondence between OTRS and copyright holder should remain confidential. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

That is a good point, but I cannot confirm or deny if the e-mail texts posted to the DR are those actually sent to OTRS. As they were not posted by any OTRS member, I don't see any rule that suggests removal. If there is any I'm missing, please advise. I'd also not disagree if anybody else removes it. --Krd 07:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Understand. Thank you for taking a look. I just assumed it was the same email, but I guess it's possible that it wasn't. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Note

Hi. Could you please take a look at this as well? Thanks! —MarcoAurelio 15:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

On the way. --Krd 15:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

PavelMuhin99

Looks like they are socking and evading block. Please check with checkuser. If they are confirmed, likely are, please block them. In addition, this account might need to be globally locked. --VKras (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

If possible please put this at Commons:Requests for checkuser. --Krd 07:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Broken redirects

You've deleted the redirects again after an accidental deletion. Can you please fix your work and try to be more careful? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I hope I have cleaned up all this now, and as I have no clue how this could happen again, I will abstain from broken redirects from now on. Sorry for the trouble! --Krd 05:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I apologize for my tone. I have a tendency to get grumpy over silly things. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

No offense taken, but the workflow has some flaws and cleaning up was a pain. I don‘t want to cause that again. --Krd 03:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Request to restore image

Hello! I posted an image, File:WURD_logo_small.png, and it was deleted due to lack of permission. However, I believe permission was submitted by email for this image. I got an auto-reply with ticket #2019091810001002. Would it be possible to restore this image? I was directed to you by User:JuTa here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JuTa. Thank you! Jon1234567 (talk) 02:45, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Please be patient. Thank you. --Krd 15:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Unblock me right away!

I don't know where to send you. If you mean in the email, I don't have one. Please understand. And correspondence with me on Wikipedia there is no other place to discuss Railgun M3 (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

@ Railgun M3 You are not blocked here. --VKras (talk) 18:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

OTRS permission

Hi. Can you add OTRS permission to Tony Blair (2010).jpg? The ticket# is 2019100110008043. Thanks! AlbanGeller (talk) 16:50, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Can you be patient until the issue is on top of the stack? --Krd 16:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. AlbanGeller (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

May I ask how long that will be? AlbanGeller (talk) 18:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

You may ask but there is no reasonable answer. --Krd 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Krd/archive/2019,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2018081910002352

Hallo Krd, könntest Du bitte mal einen Blick hierauf werfen. Herr Schmid ist per E-Mail nur über seine Tochter erreichbar. Sie hat am 19.08.2018 um 14:36 Uhr geantwortet. Genügt das oder könnten wir vielleicht weiter kommen, wenn er die Freigabe auf Papier unterschreibt und das dann dem OTRS-Team eingescannt per E-Mail zugesendet wird? Vielen Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 13:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Am 19.09. ging (durch einen Kollegen) eine Rückfrage raus, darauf fehlt uns jetzt noch die Antwort. --Krd 13:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Könntest Du mir diese Mail bitte weiterleiten, so dass mich auch noch einmal in der Sache an seine Tochter wenden könnte. Meine E-Mail-Adresse müsste hinterlegt sein. --Molgreen (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Ich möchte dem Kollegen da nicht dazwischenfunken. Vielleicht kann die Tochter ja mal nach unbeantworteten Mails schauen. Ansonsten müsste ich den Kollegen ansprechen, aber das wäre die kompliziertere Lösung. --Krd 13:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

OK, ich schreibe Ihr. Danke für Deine Mühe. --Molgreen (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe schon eine Antwort erhalten und diese ("Fw: Re: Bilder für Wikipedia - Freigabeerklärung Aw: [Ticket#2018081910002352]") an das OTRS-Team gerade ("Freitag, 04. Oktober 2019 um 17:40 Uhr") weiter geleitet. --Molgreen (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Neue Antwort ist jetzt raus. --Krd 17:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Oh, sehr schön, dass das Ticket jetzt geschlosen werden konnten. Herzlichen Dank für die Mühe! --Molgreen (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Mails

Hallo Krd, hast du die beiden Mails von mir bzw. von RAT bekommen? --K@rl (talk) 15:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Hallo, ja, danke! Kann das aber erst nächste Woche weiter verfolgen. Falls etwas fehlen sollte, melde ich mich. --Krd 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Kein Problem, bin eh durch die WikiCOn nicht online. --K@rl (talk) 16:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2019100210003135

Can you please confirm the above ticket (rather than ticket:2019100110008043) with respect to adding permission for Tony Blair (2010).jpg? Thanks. AlbanGeller (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

The ticket has already been processed by sending a followup question. --Krd 15:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

The copyright holder (EU) was unable to answer as to the web address of the uploaded file, for they weren't the ones uploading the file. They referred the question to me for this reason. AlbanGeller (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand, please say again in different words. --Krd 17:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

The followup email asked for the address (namely of the file) and they replied by saying that OTRS should direct this to me, not them. They forwarded me their reply to OTRS. AlbanGeller (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

There appear to be several tickets regarding this file. It will take a while to sort that. --Krd 17:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Is there anything I can do to help sort it out? AlbanGeller (talk) 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

As far as I see there is not the kind of followup question for this file. Please encourage the copyright holder to check their mail and send the permission again. --Krd 17:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

They forwarded the conversation they had with me to OTRS. Can you look under the subject Re: [Ticket#2019100210003135] FW: Permission to use photo under Creative Commons with the statement of permission (by the copyright holder to OTRS) dated 02/10/2019 07:29? AlbanGeller (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

That ticket is still open. Please be patient. --Krd 17:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Can I ask why? The email reply to the copyright holder by OTRS asked for "the specific name or URL of the page on Wikimedia Commons to which you have uploaded it," and the copyright holder responded by saying "(Redacted) (in copy) is the one who asked us to use our pictures. He will be the best to answer your request." AlbanGeller (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Because this is not the only open ticket, and we are all volunteers. --Krd 17:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

OK. Is there anything else I can do? AlbanGeller (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Krd, can I just ask how long this process will take? I really don't mean to bother but I would greatly appreciate if you could give me an estimate. Thanks. AlbanGeller (talk) 20:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion requests

hi signor krd, I am writing to submit this request for a filed rescheduling, well I will point out the request, it has not even been submitted to the comunity, and YOU who was the main supporter of the deletion of these following PD LICENSE FILES, now I ask you to restore them, because the files you deleted are in good standing with copyright and the rules of commons --Carlös des Chlucher (talk) 19:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Frederick Mangold mit Orchester in Russland.jpg

Dear Krd,

I thought I did not upload this picture as I was not sure if this picture was okay to upload. Unfortunately, I now realized through you, that I did accidentally upload it. Please could you take it off of Wikipedia?

Thank you so much. Mfa2002 (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

ticket:2019100210003135

Hi. Can you offer any updates on ticket:2019100210003135? Thanks. AlbanGeller (talk) 04:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please be patient. Thank you. --Krd 05:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Is there anything else I can do? AlbanGeller (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@Krd: Can you possibly give an estimate for how long this process will take? Thanks. AlbanGeller (talk) 20:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Please be patient. --Krd 07:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

@Krd: Would it not be OK in the meantime to upgrade {{OTRS received}} from |reason=email to 1? AlbanGeller (talk) 08:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

@AlbanGeller: The current backlog for English tickets is 14 days, and even longer for more complex or less-routine tickets. Following up daily will not expedite the process. Krd, or another OTRS member, will contact you when ready. You do not need to contact them further unless they request more information. Please be patient and trust the system. ~riley (talk) 00:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

@~riley: OK. Would it be too much to ask of an admin to change that particular parameter value? AlbanGeller (talk) 22:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

@Krd: Can you please rectify the {{OTRS received}} template? There's no reason whatsoever to doubt the fact that permission was given from the owner of the copyright of the image. 4nn1l2 made this edit by mistake. Can you please correct this? AlbanGeller (talk) 23:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Games Workshop images

Thank you for settling the discussion at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Warhammer_AoS_Lind.jpg . You decided that the email from Games Workshop's lawyer confirms that we can use that photo of a Warhammer match as free content. I think that, given the language of the emails, this would apply to any similar photograph of a Games Workshop game. Perhaps you could post some sort of general announcement regarding this precedent. Maybe a new copyright template that we could add to any image of a GW game to say that Games Workshop is OK with these kinds of images? Kurzon (talk) 14:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Please feel free to prepare a draft, I will then see if that could work. Thank you. --Krd 07:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

It looks like we began to process the same OTRS ticket at the same time

It looks like we began to process the same OTRS ticket 2019101810002428 at the same time. I accepted the ticket but you are the owner so I can not send the email. --Jarekt (talk) 13:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Of course you can make yourself owner of the ticket. But I'm not sure if this page is the right venue for this discussion. --Krd 14:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MariekeKraanLB

Please fix license tags for kept files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done Thx for the reminder. --Krd 07:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion requests

dear krd, I am writing to submit this request for a filed rescheduling, well I will point out the request, it has not even been submitted to the comunity, and YOU who was the main supporter of the deletion of these following PD LICENSE FILES, now I ask you to restore them, because the files you deleted are in good standing with copyright and the rules of commons--Charles de Chluscher (talk) 18:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

No. --Krd 07:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

but why??--Charles de Chluscher (talk) 09:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Ричард Мавлёв

hi krd, I am writing to tell you that the multitudes of files you erased in a mass "cleanup", are all the following PD license files with attached the various additional sources concerning the information inherent to the uploaded file, you once put in requested one of those files, and after a very brief explanation concerning a wrong license and then later it was resolved. I just want to tell you that those files were all in good faith they are not copyviol!!!!!! I await your reply, regards--109.115.18.146 12:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Odd undel

Hi, looking at File:CD-HOMES-exp115_Alfio_Giuffrida-AG_Sinnwerke.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) leaves me wondering why this took 5 years to undelete, and why there is no ticket reference in the undeletion log (the norm is to give the ticket reference). My presumption is that the same OTRS ticket was used to undel several other similar files at the same time. As the undeleting admin, could you provide some context? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

The ticket number is given at the file page. Which kind of context would you like to have? --Krd 11:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

This was an unusually long deletion period, but I'm presuming that the artist themselves took that long to realise that they needed to write an email and there was no earlier correspondence, correct me if there's anything else behind this. It's especially peculiar because the vast majority of Category:CD-Homes (AG Sinnwerke, Alfio Giuffrida) were never identified as being problematic, so given these facts, it's also a reasonable presumption that this was Common's failure to not treat all these uploads the same way (i.e. the OTRS ticket should retrospectively apply to the rest of the contents of that category). One possible action for consistency could be to find similar patterns in deletions of old 'OTRS requested' use, and make that same level of verification required for associated files, like those from the same uploader with the same author assertions.

There's a secondary point for Commons OTRS volunteers as to whether best practice is to add the OTRS reference to the log, which I think a tool might do for some people, or whether it's okay to leave it as 'OTRS' generically as you did for this case. --Fæ (talk) 11:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this can be incorporated into the workflow of everybody without pain, but at least for me it sounds reasonable. --Krd 12:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Okay, I have no plans to push on this, nor do I want to target you as you do excellent work, though we recognize that good logs make for easier accountability.

You may find OTRS restores and their delay interesting, though there may be missing OTRS based undels where the log does not contain "OTRS". Thanks --Fæ (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

To clarify: I didn't imagine there is a reason to put the ticket into the log, but as you showed one, I have already included this into my toolset as it doesn't cost me much. I'm just saying this couldn't be so easy for every agent, and in the end I personally prefer a small backlog over extensive ticket handling, and give agents some discretion how they individually perform best.

Regarding the query, please note that at the beginning of 2019 there was a backlog of up to 450 days in permissions-de for nearly a year, and I remember most files from your list s having processed them while clearing this backlog.

For the actual case Alfio_Giuffrida-AG_Sinnwerke I have to look into details later next week when back a my primary computer. Not everything can be resolved immediately from mobile devices. --Krd 07:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the extra information. All that might happen for this case might be to add tickets to the rest of the related uploads, for completeness rather than, say, an issue against the precautionary principle. As mentioned previously, more widely one might be able to retrospectively work out where 'no permission' tags have been added inconsistently, and then some files deleted while others have not been noticed.

Less of a concern, probably, is the delay in processing OTRS requests. As you say, this seems to have significantly improved.

So, no urgent actions here, just pointing out that it may be possible to do a more interesting analysis of the way these things are done, especially if a more sophisticated approach could highlight other inconsistencies. As I have no access to OTRS, my reach and therefore interest, compared to the stuff I can fully analyse, is naturally limited.

BTW, if you are looking at what current common practice is for OTRS volunteers, Comments used in OTRS related undeletes may be useful. --Fæ (talk) 11:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

I have now asked the user if the permission applies to all files in the category. --Krd 16:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 10:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Objection useless ?

Hallo Krd, warum interessiert sich hier eigentlich niemand für Einsprüche bei SLA, siehe auch hier ? Wistula (talk) 10:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Wistula. Leere Kategorien werden gelöscht. Sobald sie benötigt werden kann man sie wieder herstellen oder neu anlegen. --Krd 11:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Hm, da kommt also jemand, leert (vielleicht sinnfrei) eine Kategorie (nicht die eigene), stellt sie zur Schnelllöschung und dann wird sie trotz Widerspruchs gelöscht. Und die (vielleicht berechtigte) Wiederanlage ist - neben Arbeitsmassnahme - ja bedenklicher Revert einer administrativen Massnahme (Widerspruch wurde offenbar abgelehnt). Finde ich ein suboptimales Vorgehen, das (vielleicht) Vandalismus unterstützt. Gruss, Wistula (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Sowas wie die "eigene" Kategorie gibt es nicht, von dem Gedanken sollte man sich grundsätzlich lösen. Fakt ist, dass die Kategorie leer ist, die Gründe dafür sind völlig irrelevant. Ansonsten kämen sehr schnell Leute auf die Idee, schonmal hundertausend Kategorien anzulegen für Bilder, die es theoretisch mal geben könnte. Das wäre definitiv Unsinn.

Es gibt hier aber auch überhaupt kein Problem, da man die Bilder wieder in die Kategorie einsortieren kann. Was aber anscheinend nicht passiert ist. --Krd 11:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Mit eigene meinte ich, dass man als Admin wohl getrost und ohne weitere Prüfung solche Kats schnelllöschen kann, die der Ersteller (weil er einen Fehler gemacht hat, passiert mir öfters mal) so kennzeichnet. Das von Dir vorgeschlagene Vorgehen würde ganz offensichtlich zu einem EW führen, da ich ja nun bereits revertierte Umkategorisierungen einzelner Fotos erneut revertieren müsste, ... Das kann kaum im Sinne aller Beteiligten sein, bei solcher Handhabung bleibt dann der, der mehr Zeit verschwenden mag, der Erfolgreiche. Es muss doch möglich sein, analog de:WP, dass Admins widersprochene SLA in reguläre LDen überführen, ob nun leer oder nicht. Wistula (talk) 12:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Nein. Ich kenne keine Regel, die das vorsieht, und halte das auch nicht für sinnvoll. --Krd 13:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

RGS-X8_Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School_cloisters_ .... photo permission

Thank you for your message Ref: File:RGS-X8_Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School_cloisters_and_bell_tower_from_its_playing_field._Taken_before_1937.jpg I have indeed sent the permission template to the owner and will remind him to reply - please be patient as this is a elderly person and less often checking his mailbox, even though I have prior agreement (but I know you are unable to rely on handrwritten permissions). Thank you Gedgmoss (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Ged Moss

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Undeletion Request

hi Mr. Krd I noticed that you recently deleted countless PD license files, which many of them were linked to with the source of information, so these days I will try to apply to the commons undeletion request, calling it into question in this matter , because I begged her I begged her to give me an audience, but she was always denied, you can't behave in this way, please give me at least an answer about the matter, since I almost never expressed on this matter--2.44.221.50 18:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

ygm

Hello, Krd. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

— xaosflux ^Talk 22:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

deletion of Rattus_for_JM_cover.jpg

For the issue about deletion Rattus_for_JM_cover.jpg I sent you an email. I got emails from the photographer and article author, but they forgot to send my (for them prepared) template to the OTRS. ... Don't know yet how the undeletion process could be eventually initiated? Thanks for help. br --Commander-pirx (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Closing oversighter requests

Scanning through Commons:Oversighters, unlike for the Administrators official guideline of 75%, I can see no figures for what is the target pass rate for votes. Is this agreed elsewhere and has never been published on the actual page? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 23:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

There is something at Commons:Oversighters/Howto, which I would consider reasonable. --Krd 06:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Excellent, I missed following that link. It would be worth someone tidying up the rights guideline pages to be consistent in the rubric expected, perhaps at the point when there's a related new proposal about the process. --Fæ (talk) 06:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

I agree, and I'd appreciate if somebody could do that. --Krd 06:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Range blocks

Not having sysop access I am slightly in the dark about exactly what information gets displayed in the normal tools. Examining some of the blocked IP ranges listed at Commons:Database reports/Range blocks, publicly available sites tell me that they are not open proxies, for example, 91.230.121.0 and 103.255.0.0 do not look like they have especially bad reputations. Considering that m:NOP also differentiates between static and non-static addresses as being suitable for long term blocks or not, presumably there's a tool or database that sysops are recommended to use before judging the length of block necessary?

Thanks for any insight you can offer. --Fæ (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) FWIW: 91.230.121.0/24 has an incorrect rationale; it should have been abuse of multiple accounts (Krd can check the 2 September 2019 CU log to confirm the intent). Эlcobbola _talk 15:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Just noting that I'm probably not going to drill much further into this, mainly because I have no sysop access. However there does seem to be a problem with consistency, so that all sysops on Commons understand what the policies are, and that they are certain about the rationales and evidence they are leaving in the logs. Commons per se does not have that many active specific range blocks, however some of these are for surprisingly long periods, over 4 years with many being 1 year. If those blocks might not be based on solid evidence, or may not have been discussed with a CU, which should not surprise anyone as range blocks are a complex area, not really an obvious expectation of high competence for the average Commons administrator, they probably should be reviewed. --Fæ (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm not saying this is or is not the case, but a missing rationale for a range block possibly can be intentional in signle cases to avoid creating a relation between user blocks and IP blocks. --Krd 17:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hopefully that's not the case. Leaving suspicious blanks in comments draws attention to them as oddities, rather than simply making a generic explanation. The issues here include a misunderstanding of how different IP blocks exist for different reasons, and which blocks need contact with a CU, and which have different possible block lengths. There seems reason to believe that not all current administrators who have issued range blocks do so correctly against the documented process.

If you want to keep your thoughts private that's fine. Perhaps someday I'll do a more detailed analysis. --Fæ (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Zara Kay 2018.jpg

Moin Krd, ich wurde gerade von einem Dritten auf eine Diskrepanz bei der Angabe des Autors/Urhebers dieses Fotos zwischen EXIF-Daten (Zahir abbas Panjwani bzw. ZAP Photography) und Beschreibung (Zara Kay) aufmerksam gemacht. Da wohl du das Ticket bearbeitet hast, vielleicht kannst du mal danach schauen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Das Ticket ist soweit in Ordnung. Ich habe es jetzt in der Bildseite etwas deutlicher gemacht. --Krd 08:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Undeletion Request

hi Mr. Krd I noticed that you recently deleted countless PD license files, which many of them were linked to with the source of information, so these days I will try to apply to the commons undeletion request, calling it into question in this matter , because I begged her I begged her to give me an audience, but she was always denied, you can't behave in this way, please give me at least an answer about the matter, since I almost never expressed on this matte, I would like to submit at least one to you, so you can see what she has deleted on sight. and then I wonder why she never answered me, please answer me???? he did not even live when the administrator Ankry asked her for his opinion about a file that had managed to be restored,, look, i'm determined to put those files back to you, because it's not copyviol material, i just ask you to stop deleting them, because it's already the second time. if he wants to have any grievances, send me his opinions in discussion, but I will restore them to those files, "he asked only to let me lose once and for all,--37.182.21.247 02:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Advise re: Ticket:2019120910006171

Guten tag, Copyright violation is claimed by US government agency for 30+ images from their Flickr feed that they say were uploaded there in error with a "United States government work" license. A note on the Flickr source pages also clearly shows the photographer's name who they say was/is not an employee. I found his website and that appears true. Should I just add copyvio|reason template or start a deletion nomination, or something else? Thanks in advance. Ww2censor (talk) 12:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

If the case is clear and nothing to discuss, I'd suggest to add the copyvio template or delete straight away. --Krd 12:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

It's quite clear to me, even though they are mostly 2016 files, but I'm not an admin, so will tag them and leave it to others. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Feedback on RGS-X8_Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School_cloisters_and_bell_tower_from_its_playing_field._Taken_before_1937.jpg

Ref: File:RGS-X8_Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School_cloisters_and_bell_tower_from_its_playing_field._Taken_before_1937.jpg Hello, I have uploaded this file on behalf of an elderly archivist who has submitted an email permission and I want to encourage him before that also becomes too much. Could you expedite the permission via krdbot ASAP please so I can encourage the contributor, or worse before he is unable to do so. (Apologies also I am relatively new and also learning about Wiki protocol.. Presumably I need to wait for the permission to be processed before I add a link to this from the respective article?) Many thanks. Gedgmoss (talk) 13:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

The permission sender have received a reply, please encourage them to check their e-mail. --Krd 13:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

OTRS permission

Hello again. Can you possibly look into this for me, please? Thanks! AlbanGeller (talk) 17:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

The ticket is still open. My intention is to look into this until end of year. --Krd 18:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, but my worry is that the image may be deleted by then, since the first OTRS response was last month. Just to clarify, the head of the Audiovisual Library at the European Commission emailed OTRS on Thursday to confirm the image is free to use under the terms of CC BY 4.0. AlbanGeller (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm not going to drop off everything else from my agenda for today to read into that ticket out of my workflow. Sorry. Please be patient. --Krd 18:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Curious

What you took issue with here. Feel free to correct me, especially if I've made a mistake in a way that could be confusing for new editors. I just want to make sure I understand the problem as best I can. GMG^talk 15:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

You answered a lot of unasked questions, sadly not those the user actually asked. Please read again. --Krd 15:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough. But if they don't use the OTRS pending template, how are they to indicate that permission has been sent and avoid an immediate deletion nomination? GMG^talk 15:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Not at all, they have 7 days, far more than needed. How big is the actual backlog? Keep it simple for the user! --Krd 15:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Hmm. Roger that. GMG^talk 16:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)