User talk:Ktr101/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Pi.1415926535 in topic Notification about possible deletion
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ktr101!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mount St Helens Summit Pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount St Helens Summit Pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 08:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ktr101!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token e8c35acbbcbd269a3a4752c10285e377

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Categories for MBTA images

Hey. It's massively cool that you're uploading images of MBTA stations; we can always use more pictures. However, if you could be just a hair more careful with categories, that would be cool. The MBTA system has a pretty extensive file directory; all four Green Line branches have their own categories, and many stations do as well. (Park Street Station already had its own category; there was already a Green Line "E" Branch as well although your picture gave me enough to populate a category for Prudential). If you could take 30 seconds before you upload to make sure there's not a more accurate category to put them in, that would be great.

Have a great day, and continue with the uploads! Cheers,Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

I thought I did that but I guess I didn't. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
No problem. See ya 'round. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Top Wikipedians compared to the rest of the community

Hi, the data labels on your graphic "Top_Wikipedians_compared_to_the_rest_of_the_community are all jacked up". I posted a comment here [1]. Looks like something got lost in translation and I wanted to bring it to your attention so you can fix it. Cheers, 108.39.40.190 22:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the update! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The legend is wrong though. 1-1000 refers to the 1000 most active wikipedians. The numbers refer to ranking and not to the number of edits. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Rick_Perry_leaning_against_a_jet.jpg

 
File:Rick_Perry_leaning_against_a_jet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 01:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

United States ANG unit patches

Hi, you would save others a lot of work, if you would put the files that you beamed up in the proper categories. Thank you in advance. Cobatfor (talk) 17:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to remember to do that next time, although I cannot guarantee that I will actually remember that. Nice terminology, though. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit distribution

About File:Top Wikipedians edit distribution.png you created: When the vertical axis includes multiple orders of magnitude, it may be more meaningful to use a log scale. Just a thought. Amatulic (talk) 21:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jet over Neptune Road, East Boston, Massachusetts.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 02:59, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:CF-1 flight test.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CF-1 flight test.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Temporary not featured. Please wait a little before voting end. It will be made in the near future. I have cancelled your editings.
With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Ah, no fun. Oh well, it was worth the learning experience. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Zonta International logo.svg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zonta International logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zonta International logo.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Minuteman.jpg

 
File:Minuteman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Armbrust (talk) 12:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

International Criminal Court contributions, 2008.png

Hello Ktr101, and thanks for choosing better colours for File:International Criminal Court contributions, 2008.png. I believe the currency should be in Euro, could you correct that? --ELEKHHT 06:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to get around to it in the next week. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Kentucky_Kingdom

 

Kentucky Kingdom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Nick Moreau (talk) 18:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

You are now an image-reviewer

Note that you cannot review your own uploads.

Additionally, note that you are rapidly reaching the limit to user rights that can be assigned to you. Although 2000 contributions is on the very light side for what I'd expect to see in an admin candidate, when you hit 3000 or 4000 you should consider a run.

God, I can't believe that I just recommended you for adminship. I clearly must be losing it.   Sven Manguard Wha? 19:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh wow, I forgot I even applied to that. I figure since the rights would benefit me in helping others, I might as well apply for them and use them when I feel like helping out a bit. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Top Wikipedia editors SVGs

Many of these graphics, such as File:Top Wikipedians, November 2012.svg, contain no vector data, and are just a big PNG wrapped in an SVG... AnonMoos (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

That's odd, as I thought I was doing it right. For the next update, I'll try to fix them so that they work correctly. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Oorlogsmonument Muggenbrug Schagen.jpg

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging the duplicate. So you know, you can use {{Duplicate}} to do so, as duplicates are eligible for speedy deletion and don't have to go through the standard process. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the protip! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Chapter logo for Wikimedia Cascadia?

Hi there. I see you uploaded the chapter logos for WM Boston. If you have the ability and time, would it be possible to upload logos (or other images such as banners, barnstars, etc.) for Wikimedia Cascadia? I am not familiar with how to create similar logos, so I made an appeal for assistance here. If you are not able to help, no worries, just had to ask! (I will likely ask several contributors for assistance, so it might be worth checking to see if someone else has already offered to help or has uploaded images -- thanks!) --Another Believer (talk) 22:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your assistance! --Another Believer (talk) 08:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sam the Minuteman.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Sam the Minuteman.svg

 
File:Sam the Minuteman.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

{User:Ktr101/Bar}

When I click on the items, I get error messages. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

I think that is because you are clicking on dead links, since I really haven't created all of the pages yet. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
No problem, was just to inform you. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

File:UBC Aerial View.jpg

When there is only 1 or 2 or 3 images from a flickr account, this is possible evidence for flickrwashing. I told Admin Lymantria about this image from a flickr account with only 2 images. He somehow found that the image was stolen (ie. a flickrwash) from a website. I did not mark the image...and Lymantria filed a DR here. (the picture date is January 2, 2013 in the infobox) The image also has no camera metadata. Commons cannot open itself to lawsuits by the real copyright owner whose image was stolen by a flickrwashing account with only a few images sadly. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh god, I completely forgot about the fact that people do that, as I haven't encountered this in probably a year and a half. Sorry about that! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Just a comment. Freedom of Panorama (FOP) rules vary from country and in the United Arab Emirates there is no FOP. That is why I had to create this DR for an image which you passed. The image is far to close to the building for De Minimis to apply here as the building is hardly a trifle in the picture. PS: You're doing a great job marking images on Commons. Wish there were more of you here as I'm quite busy. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token b00912963e9a95ad0a193c861adea9f2

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File source is not properly indicated: File:Naval Auxiliary Air Station Charlestown circa 1945.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Naval Auxiliary Air Station Charlestown circa 1945.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:57, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Odd errors with mobile upload

Hey, I've noticed a couple odd errors with some of your mobile uploads. Files like File:Coming in over Boston Harbor.jpg have no date listed, and "temporary description text". I have no experience with the app - proud owner of an old-school flip phone here - so i figured I'd let you know. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I did those early on in the app's development, so a lot of what occurred was me beta testing everything. You're not the only one to notice it though, and I'm thinking that I may have to go back and correct them in the future, if it is as big of a problem as it looks like it is. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Oddball photo requests in southeastern Massachusetts

I left some oddball photo requests for John Phelan to put on his long-term hitlist. Largely abandoned stations plus a couple modern bus stations and layover yards. I figured I'd let you know in case you happened to be about the area gathering photos and were interested in grabbing some. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Darn, I wish I saw that two and a half weeks ago, as I biked right through the Falmouth location! I also just realized that I have station photos in the Bourne area that I took last summer, so I might as well upload those while I am thinking about it. I also did re-discover some photos of the Falmouth station that I have, including the raised platform, so I will also do that now. It would be cool to go back and photograph around the trail goes around the still-existent track, although it might be an odd thing to request at this time. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:56, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Elizabeth Holtzman.jpg

Hi, can you have a look at this image. You confirmed OTRS permission, but there is still no license. Thx. --JuTa 20:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Please be careful if you confirm a permission. In this case the ticket is definitely not a valid permission. Jcb (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
You're right, and I definitely messed up that one and shouldn't have taken it due to my lack of experience at the time. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:GALAXY Note 8.0.jpg

 
File:GALAXY Note 8.0.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Jeromesandilanico (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Diana Mara Henry by Thomas Lee Jones.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Diana Mara Henry by Thomas Lee Jones.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jane Fonda addressing Women Office Workers' convention NYC.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Fonda addressing Women Office Workers' convention NYC.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jane Fonda addressing Women Office Workers' convention NYC.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ed Murphy in 1973.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ed Murphy in 1973.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ed Murphy in 1973.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Martha's Vineyard Railroad map.gif

 
File:Martha's Vineyard Railroad map.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Account creation on Wikipedia and Facebook.pdf

 
File:Account creation on Wikipedia and Facebook.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    13:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for Spanish version of File:Wikimedia New England mobile logo.svg

Hi! Are you interested in making a Spanish version of File:Wikimedia New England mobile logo.svg? It needs to say "Wikimedia Nueva Inglaterra". A Spanish version of File:Wikimedia New England logo.svg would also be desireable.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 05:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I'll start asking around, as I didn't actually create the original one, but have just been modifying the original one. Is there a specific site that you have in mind for this, as I am interested to see where it would be used. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! It would be used at this meta page: Wikimedistas de Nueva Inglaterra. Immigration from Hispanic countries makes Spanish an important language for US-related projects. WhisperToMe (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

User licensing template

Hello Ktr101,

Any user template including license template (such as {{Cc-by-3.0}} or other CC license, or any commons-compatible license) MUST be SUBST:'ed, otherwise bot will tag your image as No license. (See history of File:2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, 11.JPG) I have susbt'ed that image, but please fix the remaining. Thanks, — Revi 15:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

This is a policy, and you should follow it. I'm reverting your edit. — Revi 07:29, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning: If you ignore and revert me against COM:USER, I will be going to COM:AN/U. — Revi 04:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Look, I saw that you added the licensing template to my page, and I decided to revert it because I figured that since it was used on hundreds of other pages, it would make much more sense to have it where I could easily modify the template while it is still new. Just because I had no idea what this policy was beforehand does not give you the right to threaten to bring a user to AN/U, because there is a difference between malicious intent and trying to figure out what I am going to do with my own images in terms of licensing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Your way of using licensing template will make bot tagging files as no license because there is no license template on file page, and it will make search engines impossible to know license. Still, you can move your notice part to User:Ktr101/Notice or somewhere, and transclude it on User:Ktr101/License with license template, and subst it. — Revi 22:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Japanese Kit Kat Bar.JPG

 
File:Japanese Kit Kat Bar.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 12:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Japanese Kit Kat Bar.JPG

 
File:Japanese Kit Kat Bar.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smial (talk) 08:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Japanese Crunch bar.JPG

 
File:Japanese Crunch bar.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 23:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your e-mail to Russavia

Kevin,
this is just to let you know that the e-mail you sent to @Russavia is currently being investigated by OTRS administrators. As far as I am aware, what they are concerned about is your continued use of the pronoun "we" – would you mind explaining to me (I) on whose behalf you wrote that e-mail? In particular, as a Commons contributor and administrator, I would be interested in learning why, and on what basis, did you write:

From this point forward, any images, categories, templates, pages, or anything else created by you on any Wikimedia sitewith the intention of circumventing your ban will be deleted immediately, without prejudice.

As far as I know, you have no community consensus to delete anything from Wikimedia Commons, and none of this has been discussed with this community; I would therefore welcome an explanation why you thought it fit to speak on behalf of this community, or on that matter, anyone other than yourself. Please be aware that your e-mail is available in its entirety at pastebin.com for anyone to read. Thank you for your time, odder (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

still no response --The_Photographer (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
… even though Ktr101 has been active, among others, on the English Wikipedia and the OTRS wiki, where he posted quite a long response not even two hours after my request above. Hmm. odder (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 
File:New England Wikimedians - Membership - Order of Business - July 19, 2014.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 23:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 
File:New England Wikimedians - Membership - Meeting Minutes - July 19, 2014.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 23:25, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fort Dix military police at Camp Wellfleet, 1958.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fort Dix military police at Camp Wellfleet, 1958.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fort Dix military police at Camp Wellfleet, 1958.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

(talk) 23:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Rainbow Swash.JPG

 
File:Rainbow Swash.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

(talk) 23:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Edward Mordake.jpg

 
File:Edward Mordake.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 23:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bosco Verticale, June 2013.jpg

 
File:Bosco Verticale, June 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 00:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Macys Parade statuette.JPG

 
File:Macys Parade statuette.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 00:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Japanese Crunch bar.JPG

 
File:Japanese Crunch bar.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

(talk) 01:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This file was raised as a copyvio a few days ago and you deleted the template [2]. The correct process is to convert to a deletion request. Please familiarise yourself with Commons policy before taking any similar action. -- (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Kevin, as is normal practice on English Wikipedia, you are expected to inform users that you have raised a concern by posting a message on their talk page. I trust you'll inform Odder at his talk page to fulfil this requirement. Nick (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Noted, and thanks for the reminder. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Vordingborg mast.jpg

Hi Ktr101. Something went wrong in your edit. Could you please fix it? --Leyo 17:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

@Leyo: Thanks for catching that, as it appears as though the script read the articles that this appears on on the English project and attempted to add that into the description. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Jaysh al-Sunna Logo.png

Hi Ktr101. Thank you for your help at COM:VP#File:Junud al-Sham.jpg and File:Flag of the Islamic Front (Syria) (Green).jpg. Would you also mind taking a look at this image as well? It was uploaded by the same editor, yet there's no indication that they are the original copyright holder. Thank you in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

ticket:2015061510003742

Dear Ktr101,

Could you please reply to this ticket? Normally I would just pick it up but the way you responded to their first email makes me reluctant to act. Natuur12 (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Because I found the way you dealth with this ticket a bit strange I decided to check a couple of your older tickets. ticket:2015020210013629 requires action. The advice you gave is incorrect, you never marked the files as permission confirmed and the ticket is invalid. ticket:2015020110006406 is also invalid, permission statement comes from the subject, not the photographer. ticket:2015013010018583 is also a bit strange. You ask them to provide a link to the photograph while it is added in the attachment. ticket:2015013010010787 is also invalid. Again permission from the subject and you never informed the uploader that the file was marked as permission confirmed or something similar. I only took a quick look at some of your tickets and it worries me. Is there something I can do to help so situation like this don't occur anymore? Natuur12 (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
I somehow lost the first ticket and thought someone else finished it for me, but I'll go ahead and finish it up now. I think the next one might have been from a quick search, so I should have paid a bit more attention in that one. The next one mentioned the sole owner, so I assumed it was transferred to the subject, based on the wording of the permission, and thus assumed good faith there. The next one was because I forgot to search it, but I'll add the tag now. I can resolve the last one if you want so let me know. In terms of the above, I'm planning on slowing down to make sure that I do not repeat these mistakes in the future, so let me know if you find anything else and I will try to fix it immediately. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
I believe this search shows all images you have ticketed on Commons, giving a total of 31 over 2 years remaining undeleted. Please let me know if this is inaccurate. The error rate for an OTRS volunteer publicly representing our project on copyright is high, especially in conjunction with previous errors on copyright raised for your own images. Do you understand why this worries many Commons volunteers and can undermine trust in how the OTRS system allows access to the Commons queue for copyright verification? -- (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
ticket:2015020110006406 is also invalid. The permission statement comes from the subject. When the subject sends in a declaration that he wants to release a file under a free license we should always ask how they became the copyright holder. Most of the time they just bought the photograph or the photographer granted them a license to use the photograph. In both cases the subject doesn't have the right to license the intellectual property of the photographer.
When dealing with work for hires you need to be careful. Bands for example often believe that they are the copyright holder via a work off hire doctrine or some other construction but if you ask about the details it becomes clear that they merely have the right to use the photograph. When dealing with companies and universities this is seldom the case and they in fact did make sure that they are the copyright holder. But still, always ask how they became the copyright holder of a work.
If someone send you the photograph but doesn't provide you with a link don't worry. Just download it at your computer and try to upload it via the upload wizard. The upload wizard will give an error and will provide you a link to the file location if it was already uploaded before. Beware, this doesn't always work. Always add a note to the ticket which contains the link. This an safe you a lot of time and it makes it easier to understand what happened for fellow agents. If you are dealing with gmail, hotmail etc it is smart to make some notes at the ticket about how you validated the emailadress. I know that Fae for example always documented very clearly what he did and why he did it.
And last but not least. OTRS has a "watchlist". It is very educational to watch how other agents deal with tickets. Especially the tough once.Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
ticket:2015061510003742 has a reply. Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Commons mobile app is alive and kicking :-)

I took the liberty to remove the "historical" tag as the project is very much alive, actually WMF staff plus me plus a full-time intern are currently working on it, see Commons_talk:Mobile_app :-) Cheers! Syced (talk) 01:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank goodness, as I thought it was down when I was unable to upload an image earlier in the month. Thanks for the hard work, as I cannot wait to see what comes out of this iteration! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Earl of Angus statue.jpg

 
File:Earl of Angus statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mia Matsumiya.jpg

 
File:Mia Matsumiya.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mia Matsumiya.jpg

 
File:Mia Matsumiya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 10:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

DR

Regretfully, I have been pushed into asking for an independent review of your license reviewer right. It would have been nicer to be able to leave a comment for your consideration without taking it any further. Feel free to comment at COM:AN. Thanks -- (talk) 12:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Hardingnewlogo.jpg

 
File:Hardingnewlogo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Josve05a (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Silver btp roundel.PNG

 
File:Silver btp roundel.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Plaza Julio Caro Baroja.jpg

 
File:Plaza Julio Caro Baroja.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Karl Pink Moment400.jpg

 
File:Karl Pink Moment400.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wil high res.jpg

 
File:Wil high res.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Ktr101/common.js

Hi Ktr101, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Ktr101/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 103 character 53: ['name'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: groupPages[query.allmessages[am]["name"].replace("grouppage-","")] = query.allmessages[am]["*"].replace("{{ns:project}}:","Project:");

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC).

File(s) appeared in Category:Language templates with no text displayed

Hello Ktr101, it seems that your latest changes or uploads of the file(s) Edsc2.jpg broke a template. This assumption has been made because the file(s) appeared in the maintenance Category:Language templates with no text displayed. To fix this issue please check this category for further information. If the file(s) is/are not contained in the maintenance category anymore someone else already did the work and you can ignore this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --ArndBot (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Pinging as an issue you have been involved with (due to the identity of the uploader). Revent (talk) 18:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

LR

Dear Ktr101,

Please see my request here. The consensus was clear and therefor I ask for the removal of your LR flag. Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

What is BobbiBillard2016.JPG lacking?

ok what kind of proof do you need? what is this lacking.. it was originally sent to my alternate e-mail sprtcs40@yahoo.com

I can send you a copy of what i was sent. from Bobbi's alternate e-mail that is connected to her verified google plus account.


Jim E aka:Spart

A discussion has been raised on the OTRS mailing list that you are not who you claim to be, so any claims to copyright ownership over those images are effectively null and void. As such, I have tagged the images for deletion as copyright violations, as you do not have ownership over their respective copyrights. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Top 5,000 article creators, 8 January 2014.svg

File:Top 5,000 article creators, 8 January 2014.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Top 5,000 article creators, 8 January 2014.svg MSJapan (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Top article creators when compared to the rest of the community, 8 January 2014.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Top article creators when compared to the rest of the community, 8 January 2014.svg MSJapan (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Top article creators amongst themselves, 8 January 2014.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Top article creators amongst themselves, 8 January 2014.svg MSJapan (talk) 18:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cernan Gemini IX 1.jpg

File:Cernan Gemini IX 1.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Badzil (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Leahy Cruiser.gif

File:Leahy Cruiser.gif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leahy Cruiser.gif Jcb (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

File:The Freeze.jpg

File:The Freeze.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Freeze.jpg Ww2censor (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Leslie Jones collection

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Ktr101/Archive 1".