Kyro

Image:Infomars.png

Bonjour, si l'image est en règle, il faudrait quand même envoyer un ticket OTRS. D'autre part, je ne suis pas sur que ça cadre avec le projet. - Zil (d) 09:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Si le logo est utilisé sur plusieurs des projets Wikimedia (ex. Wikipédia), les administrateurs l'autorisent. Exemple de mon manchot. Diti (talk to the penguin) 20:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Steves blood pressure.jpg

Hello, your image has been removed as you tagged it for speedy deletion. Could you please provide a reason here, just for the records. Thanks, →Christian.И 12:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I proposed it my self,reason was copyvio on flickr Kyro (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Kyro!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Perdu.png is uncategorized since 11 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Mil Mascaras 1.jpg is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
• Image:Aenlevement.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:C'est toi l'image manquante.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Gordon Freeman.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:IMac aluminium.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Serge Dassault crop.jpg was uncategorized on 9 September 2009.
• Image:Bluebg rounded-1.png was uncategorized on 16 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Combe de Savoie by M Riegler.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Damaged Raw by Matthieu Riegler.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Clocher d'Urçay.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Ligne C - Boulevard Jean Pain by Matthieu Riegler.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Des ptits trous.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Photo vieilli.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Zoomzoom.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Image en double

Bonjour,

Je viens de remarque que tu as téléchargé une image en double : File:Cat by Kyro.JPG & File:Cat by Matthieu Riegler.JPG. Il me semble inutile de conserver les deux, laquelle puis-je supprimer ? Cdlt, VIGNERON * ^discut. 12:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Salut, en effet, tu peux supprimer la 1ère : File:Cat by Kyro.JPG. Kyro (talk) 14:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Image request (Je voudrais que vous fassiez une image...)

Hi! I saw your animation File:IPod shuffle.png. Can you please make an image like that with all three generations (versions) of the iPod Shuffle? 1st generation, 2nd, and 3rd, from left to right, like File:IPod_Line.png. I admire your work and think it would make a valuable contribution to en:iPod Shuffle. Thank you in advance. --HereToHelp (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, i just did the one for the 1G here and i'am on the Third generation one. Kyro (talk) 09:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It looks really good.--HereToHelp (talk) 23:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. It has been brought to my attention that the iPod touch needs a silver/gray border (see en:File:IPod Touch 2.0.png). This distinguished the new model from the old one. Can you correct that in File:IPod family.png please?--HereToHelp (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. Kyro (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Panasonic

Panasonic DMC FZ-18

Bonjour Monsieur Riegler. Je vois que vous faites de la publicité pour le Panasonic DMC FZ-18 sur Wikipédia et Commons. Est-ce que cela rapporte bien? Pensez-vous que je puisse avoir un appareil gratuit si je faisais le même genre de promotion car mon vieux Canon PowerShot A 620 7.1 commence à rendre l'âme? Avec mes respectueuses salutations, --gilbertus (talk) 19:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

P.-S. Vous pourriez donner aussi le nom du magasin où l’on peut se procurer cet appareil

Bonjour, je ne fais pas de pub et ce n'est pas ce que je recherche à faire , Mon appareil se trouve dans tout bon magasin qui vend du matériel photo quoi que mon modèle ayant plus d'un an maintenant il risque d'être plus difficile à trouver. Kyro (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Your flickr review request

..has been closed as successful, and I have (or...will, after this post :)) added you to the flickr review list. The bulk of the backlog can be found at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. Take a look at COM:FLICKR and COM:L for any other information, or feel free to ask me. An optional userbox can be found at {{User trusted}} or {{User reviewer}}. Good luck and thank you for your work on Commons! :) PeterSymonds (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Note

The flickr owner has agreed to license this image here as "CC BY SA 2.0" on Flickr. See here: [1] I trust this is OK and that you will ask that the DR be closed....because that image is heavily used on wikipedia. You can even mark it as a trusted user if Flickr review hsn't marked it yet. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

coucou

dits, j'ai vue la PàS sur l'image de Coluche, je voudrais en savoir plus sur le lien google que tu as utilisé : c'est un identificateur de similitudes ?! si ça arrive à relier un dessin et une photo, ça a l'air plutôt puissant, comment ça s'utilise stp ? --Lilyu (talk) 17:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Salut, en fait c'est un outil en développement chez Google (Google Lab), pour le moment c'est seulement possible de faire d'abord un recherche d'image puis ensuite chercher les images smilaires. C'est sûr qu'il serait très intéressant de trouver comment faire pareil avec un image dont on a l'url vu que il parait bien plus puissant que Tineye. Kyro (talk) 20:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 801a4d6c0c5388897bab98076df0ed20

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

More iPods

Hello again. Apple has updated the iPod nano (the screen is taller) and I would like for you to update File:IPod family.png. If it's not too much trouble, could you create an image of the iPod nanos, like you did with the shuffle? Thank you so much. HereToHelp (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, i'm a bit busy these day, but i'll try to do it ;) Kyro (talk) 08:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Whenever you can do it is fine. HereToHelp (talk) 01:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

...and the iMac

Apple just released a new iMac (français), so I would like for you to update [image]. The screen is bigger, 16:9 aspect ratio, and the black plastic has changed a little. Thanks for all the illustrations; they really make the articles look great. HereToHelp (talk) 23:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! HereToHelp (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Logo LaTania.jpg

Hello Kyro, I've converted your speedy into a deletion request for further discussion. Thanks, Blurpeace 19:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Stop it.

--blunt. (talk) 11:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Vallée du Grésivaudan.jpg

Salut. Pour info j'ai nominé cette photo ici et ici. Il a été suggéré que des annotations plus nombreuses (montagnes et villes) augmenteraient l'intérêt de la photo. Si jamais tu as le temps... --Eusebius (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Kyro (et Eusebius), et bravo pour la double nomination en VI. Merci à Kyro pour les annotations ajoutées. Pour info, j'ai ouvert un fil de discussion sur le Bistro à ce sujet, en prenant cette photo comme exemple : Commons:Bistro#Les notes sur les fichiers ne sont pas visibles sur les Wikipedias... et c'est dommage. Cordialement, --Myrabella (talk) 07:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chartreuse massif.

review

• Photograph of the whole massif. Can't check location at the moment, but from the precise textual description I presume it's correct.  Support. Perhaps some more annotations with place names possible? --Ikar.us (talk) 21:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll make a suggestion to the photographer. --Eusebius (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I've added some place names. Kyro (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grésivaudan valley.

review

• On File:Vallée du Grésivaudan.JPG, towns in the valley are recognizable.  Request Annotations for places in the valley, like for the mountains. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

1) The picture you point out only shows about half of the valley, 2) I'm unable to point out the towns precisely (they're not geographically "separated" and I don't know them well) but I don't think annotations have become a requirement? --Eusebius (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

"Fully described" is a requirement. For the valley scope, I dare to request details about the valley. --Ikar.us (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Current description largely fulfils the criterion. The existing annotations are already a "bonus". Please have a look at the existing corpus of geographic VIs for comparison. --Eusebius (talk) 07:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I've added more place names, is it enough ? Kyro (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

 Support Yes, can fulfill the map claim (from the other nomintion) now. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 06:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Tour_Perret_Grenoble_vue_aerienne.jpg

File:Tour_Perret_Grenoble_vue_aerienne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Tour_Perret_by_M._Riegler.jpg

File:Tour_Perret_by_M._Riegler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Kyro, sämtliche Zeiten hier auf Commons sind UTC, dein Abschnitt war noch nicht ganz fertig. Trotzdem Danke fürs Helfen. Wäre schön, wenn du öfters mal vorbei schauen würdest. Hast du eigentlich schon Sichterrechte? Dein Kontroll-Logbuch ist anscheinend noch leer. Gruß --myself488 ^talk 20:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Ich habe dir die Kontroll-Rechte gegeben. Sollte jetzt funktionieren. Unter Commons:Counter Vandalism Unit#Tools findest du noch nützliche Hinweise. --myself488 ^talk 21:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Kyro (talk) 21:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Out of scope

Hi Kyro,

Thanks for noticing that Morad El Moussaoui was out of scope. I accidently noticed you edit when browsing around, but blanking the page with the editsummary "out of scope" is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use the {{speedy}}-template and add it on top of the page. Like this:

{{speedy|out of scope}}
blabla
original content here

This way it will be placed on a special list of speedies that administrators check regulary. –Krinkle^talk 21:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm kinda a newbie for that type things, thanks for the advice ;) Kyro (talk) 21:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. By the way, I re-moved the copy of my message here on my own talkpage back here. This to prevent to be unable to trace who said what (here is a page-history). –Krinkle^talk 21:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Patrolling

Hi, I see you marked this edit as patrolled. This anonymous user is changing the name of the Photographer attributed. The anonymous user has not made any edits before and is not asociated with the Uploader as far as I can see. I think the edit should be reverted.
The checklists have a backlog, but quality is more important then speed. Take it easy and dont rush it –Krinkle^talk 21:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

merci...

...beaucoup, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 16:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For your outstanding work on COM:ANO, I hereby give you this barnstar. ¡Sigue así! ;-) --Diego Grez return fire 18:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

• I subscribe Diego's words :) thank you for your work! --by Màñü飆¹5 ^talk 19:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
• –Krinkle^talk 19:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Totally deserved it.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AMD Athlon XP Palomino.Jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments in my opinion a good QI, interisting display of a Microprocessor--J. Lunau 20:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Würzburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• File:Wuerzburg altstadt panorama.jpg looks better, but this one is much better documented.  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 06:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • And it covers a wider area on the left. --Ikar.us (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Most of the town was destroyed, but is the oldest residential building really from 1929? --Ikar.us (talk) 06:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Corrected by annotator, it's the oldest high-rise building. --Ikar.us (talk) 00:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Request Please add a link in the scope (to the related category, I guess), see COM:VISC#Links_in_the_scope. --Myrabella (talk) 07:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks. --Myrabella (talk) 23:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

iPhone 4

Hello. I would like to ask you if you would make a Photoshop version of the iPhone 4 to use on the iPhone 4 page please?
86.129.192.49 16:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

iPhone 4

Je peux savoir pourquoi tu as demandé la suppression de l'image ? Lppa (talk) 18:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

EDIT : Pourquoi l'interface n'est-elle pas libre ? Lppa (talk) 18:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Pourquoi ? Va donc demander à Apple pourquoi ils ont déposé des brevets dessus tient ! Kyro (talk) 19:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

L'interface de ton ancien 3GS n'était donc pas plus libre... Lppa (talk) 19:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Tout est une histoire de taille et de rapport. Kyro (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Peu convinquant. Lppa (d) 19:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Lecture ! COM:DM. Kyro (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Sur ton ancienne image, l'interface était aussi voyante que sur la "mienne"... Pas d'excuses ! Lppa (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Tramway de Grenoble

Salut Kyro,

Après recherche, j'ai encore une carte postale en couleur (comme celles du téléphérique) qui représente la place Notre-Dame et deux rames de tramway, probablement avant guerre.

Si tu es interressé, je peux la téléverser lundi ou mardi dans la catégorie histoire de grenoble.

Au passage, bravo pour les photos panoramiques du mont Jalla ou du campus en autre.

Milky (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

tramway grenoble

Et non, la carte que j'ai est déjà dans la catégorie des anciens tramways en N°2, mais si j'en ai de nouvelles, je serais où les placer.

Milky (talk) 20:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

File:iPod family.png

The iPod family image needs to be updated to include the new touch, nano, and shuffle. Thanks. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 04:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Python-logo-notext.svg

File:Python-logo-notext.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Masur (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Capitales

Salut :). Juste pour te dire, par rapport à ta PU, que les adjctifs de nationalité prennent une majuscule en anglais, et on écrit donc French Wikipedia et non french Wikipedia, juste un détail ;). Lppa (talk) 19:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Grenoble - PLM - 1901.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Grenoble - Île-Verte - 1900.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Permission OTRS

Salut, j'ai vu que tu as apposé plusieurs {{Npd}} sur des fichiers que j'ai importé. Qu'est-ce qui dans la permission (ticket 2010102610012089) ne convenait pas ? Kyro (talk) 18:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour,

L'émetteur de l'autorisation a reçu une réponse détaillée lui expliquant les problèmes qui restaient à résoudre.

Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 10:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Stades_des_Alpes_depuis_la_Bastille_by_Matthieu_Riegler.jpg

File:Stades_des_Alpes_depuis_la_Bastille_by_Matthieu_Riegler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grcampbell (talk) 07:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Combler les blancs dans un panorama

Salut Kyro tu peux me faire des miracles sur ce panorama ? File:Panorama du Château des Ducs de Bretagne 2.JPG, Merci ! Otourly (talk) 08:36, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done Kyro (talk) 11:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Je vois pas la différence, il y a toujours les trous dans les angles... Otourly (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Problème de cache, si tu regarde la version full-res tu verras qu'il n'y a plus rien ;) Kyro (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

merci Otourly (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Kyro, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Bluebg_rounded-1.png

File:Bluebg_rounded-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernard Thévenet - Six jours de Grenoble 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Toute ma jeunesse! On a vieilli, mais c'est bien lui ! QI, good portrait.--Jebulon 22:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Scripts to ease the task

Bon soir Kyro,

das ist ja toll, ich kann gleich auf Deutsch weiterschreiben: Ich sehe, dass Du Löschanträge immer noch manuell anlegst. Das ist Ok, aber wenn es schneller gegen soll, kannst Du einfach den "nominate for deletion"-link in Deiner "Tool-box" benutzen. Außerdem gibt es ein Gadget, Quick Delete, das es erleichtert Copyvios und Bilder ohne Quelle od. Lizenz zu kennzeichnen und die Uploader zu benachrichtigen. Generell kann sich ein Blick in unser Gadget-Sortiment auszahlen. -- RE rillke questions? 18:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Danke für das Tipp ! Kyro (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Missing license

Hi Kyro. Can you please add a license to File:IPod_Shuffle_2G.jpg? Thanks. 99of9 (talk) 09:19, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done Kyro (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

99of9, was this intended as a trap? -- RE rillke questions? 12:07, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand the meaning of the question, my tempalte adds the Cc-by-sa licence banner. Kyro (talk) 12:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion. I just asked 99of9 whether there was a trap-intention behind the question. (Inserted a comma now)

Since it could considered being a derivative work. But I am personally not happy with the DR-closure. -- RE rillke questions? 12:19, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

 Comment No, it wasn't a trap, I just don't like admins having files without licenses! You are right that DW is arguable, but that's a matter for (complex) DRs. I don't expect new admins to automatically have an opinion on something as complex as that. --99of9 (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. I don't have the time for a complex DR. Let's keep it as it is. -- RE rillke questions? 12:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daniel Mangeas (2)- Six jours de Grenoble 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture despite dark conditions. QI for me. Ludo29 18:58, 22 November 2011 (UTC)...But who nominates ?--Jebulon 23:03, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Administrator

---

Offert au nouvel administrateur par ses confrères…

Félicitations Kyro ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the team. You may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful. Feel free to edit or add to it.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Thks yall ! Kyro (talk) 18:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

QI nomination

Hallo Kyro! I made some changes on my picture File:RMCA main building.jpg that you declined QI statues and I was hoping that you could have another look to see if the problem you identified has been fixed or perhaps give me some other suggestions - if you have time of course. Thank you. Sincerely, Jopparn (talk) 14:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

FAHRENHEITº©

Hola, No sé por qué borraste esa imagen, nos había sido cedida por el artista (Nicolas Henri) y tenemos los derechos de reproducción, dejaste dos páginas sin imagen. ¿Cuál fue el motivo? Ya teníamos los permisos correspondientes de Commons desde septiembre pasado. Ojalá me puedas orientar porque estoy muy preocupado.--201.154.199.218 19:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC) Hi, I don't know why you ereased that image, it was authorized to be used by the same creator (Nicolas Henri) and we have the rights for reproduction, you left 2 pages without image. Why? We already had the permission by Commons from last September. I hope you can orient me because Im really disturbed.--201.154.199.218 19:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

No sé por qué no está aceptando mi firma (Rubén J. Marshall T. usuario wikipedia en español con vínculo a commons que fue como subí la imagen), pero sí fue mi intención firmar con mi usuario | I don't know why is not accepting my signature (Rubén J. Marshall T., wikipedia user in Spanish, with link to commos that was as i uploaded the image, but it was my itention to sign with my user account

Impression d'écran

J'utilise FireShot qui est compatible avec Firefox 9 contrairement à Screengrab! . C'est la même chose. @Kyro, je n'ai pas fais de copie d'écran car l'image ne concerve pas le zoom contrairement à la photo. Vi..Cult... (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Aiden Ashley May 2011.jpg

• I don't understand how this was a copyright violation; I clearly listed the proof of licensing (everything on WordPress.com is listed under that license, including photos). And it would have been nice had you left a message on my talk page notifying me of the pending deletion. Erpert (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but no. Everything on WordPress.com is not under a free licence. Kyro (talk) 07:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Fichier:JHM-1985- PR100.R - Grenoble.jpg

CC or not CC ?

Bonjour,

J'avais suivi avec intérêt le fait que tu aies réussi à convaincre l'utilisateur Flickr JHM0284 de placer sous licence libre ses nombreuses photographies de bus. Je viens d'aller voir ses albums pour compléter les articles consacrés à Rennes, et tout est (à nouveau) sous licence propriétaire, y compris ce que tu as déjà uploadé.

Avais-tu vu cela ? Penses-tu qu'il soit toujours possible de recontacter ce photographe ?

Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 13:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Oui et oui. En fait il a un bouquin sur les TC en préparation mais j'ai son contact par mail, il peut libérer quelque image sur demande. Si tu veux liste moi en qqune et je lui retransmetrais la demande. Kyro (talk) 13:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Vous êtes incroyable! J'apprécie tous ce que vous avez contribué à wiki et surtout pour la région Isère y inclus Grenoble et tout.MERCI ET BRAVO! Alihadianfr (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Demande de suppression rapide

Salut ! J'ai une demande de suppression immédiate qui traine. Je me permets donc de m'adresser directement à toi (plus simple), c'est assez pressant (c'est l'entreprise chez qui j'ai pris la photo qui me demande de la retirer, donc je préfère garder de bonnes relations avec eux.) Un grand merci d'avance ! Bonne soiiiiréééee Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 23:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Baaah, encore merci pour la rapidité Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 15:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocage sur WP (Piaf)

Salut, pourrais tu m'expliquer en quoi le fait de n'être "bloqué qu'une semaine" est une justification pour un blocage ? J'ai laissé un message sur ma PDD, aurais-tu l'ammabilité de répondre ?! Pour info, Bobybarman (Commons) = Piaf (Wikipédia) --Bobybarman (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Il n'y a pas que wikipédia

Pourquoi les liens vers l'accueil des autres projets sans signaler le problème ?? -- ◄ David L • discuter ► 00:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Avoir 7 liens avec le même label c'est tout sauf une bonne chose. Kyro (talk) 00:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Le problème ne se résoudra pas de lui-même si personne ne le signale.

-- ◄ David L • discuter ► 00:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Il ne me semble pas qu'il y a de solution (simple et pratique). C'est d'ailleurs pour cela qu'on a pas mis ces liens à gauche mais en bas de Accueil. Kyro (talk) 00:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: SVG

What kind of thing? A simple electronic device?. Please, I know it's your PNG and all, but you shoudn't revert my edits just because you don't like the svg. I will not revert your edit ultil you send me a response. House (talk) 14:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC) And a second thing, I uploaded my SVG in September 12, and you updated your PNG in September 14, almost with the same design. I'm not saying that you "copied" my design, but it looks like it wasn't so ugly at all.

The problem is not that you copied something or what so ever. But frankly, SVG is great for maps, icons, logos but not for devices, is doesn't look realistic. Kyro (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Nobody copied anyone, in fact, I made the ilustration first, it doesn't matter. And as I already said, the two files look exactly the same. If it looks realistic or not is only your personal opinion. Just remember what the template says, "when better", so users won't use my version if they don't like it, but please, let them choice. I'm going to undo your edits, if you don't agree first tell me a technical reason, not a personal one. House (talk) 22:18, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

OK ?

C'est mon chat. :-)

Salut administrateur français.

Bon alors je connais rien à Commons (Hem...) et j'ai téléchargé une nouvelle image...
Celle jointe. Tout est bon ? --Orikrin1998 (talk) 08:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadel Evans - Criterium du Dauphiné 2012 - 1ere étape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. I'd try a vertical shot the next time. --Kadellar 21:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernard Hinault - Critérium du Dauphiné 2012 - Prologue (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andy Schleck - Critérium du Dauphiné 2012 - Prologue (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good. --Ralf Roletschek 15:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Project prt sc.png

Hi Kyro,

Can you explain why is deleted this file.--Liridon (talk) 16:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted UI. Kyro (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Renommage Mont Aiguille

Bonjour,
Pourrais-tu renommer les fichiers File:Mont Aiguille depuis le col des Deux 1.jpg et File:Mont Aiguille depuis le col des Deux 2.jpg en File:Mont Aiguille depuis le col de l'Allimas 1.jpg et File:Mont Aiguille depuis le col de l'Allimas 2.jpg. J'étais tellement fatigué à l'issue de ma balade à vélo que j'en ai un peu perdu mes repères, mais je me suis rendu compte assez rapidement de mon erreur (j'ai déjà corrigé la description).
Salutations. Gemini1980 (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done Voilà messir! Kyro (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thx. Gemini1980 (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Six jours Grenoble

Sorry, my mistake. --Nicola (talk) 17:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ministère des Beaux-Arts - Ruines du Temple de Mercure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 20:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crémaillère - Panoramique des Dômes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 16:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doudart de Lagrée - Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Modifier image

La photo de Michel ISSINDOU n'est pas la bonne. Merci de m'indiquer comment la changer

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuve baptismale - Crypte archéologique - Grenoble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 19:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:August Zang.png

File:August Zang.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Heubergen (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Kyro, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 15:07, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Mac Os X / Aqua titlebar

Hi, I have been pointed in your direction as an expert on the matter. I have one simple question, is the Mac OS X title bar copyrighted/copyrightable? There seem to be images of it around that are tagged as free, others as copyrighted and under fair use: w:File:Appleterminal2.png is tagged as used under fair use, while File:Firefox5 Mac OS X.png, File:Firefox 10 on Mac OS X.png, File:Firefox 3.0.10 Mac OS X FIN.png, File:Firefox 8 on Mac OS X.png is tagged as under MPL, File:VandalFighter3.4-Mac OS X.png, File:Rkhunter on Mac OS X.png under GPL, File:Xload screenshot-Mac-OS-X.xcf is asserting copyright on it as releasing it under CC-3 unported etcetera. Category:Mac OS X screenshots is not much help as it refers to "should not contain any visible elements of the operating system itself" which to my mind means the title bar too... Commons:Screenshots#Software on the right points out that XFCE's title bar is copyrighted and licensed under GPL and specifically suggest using a free OS to avoid these licensing problems. If it is indeed the case that those are copyrighted, then there's a whole lot of screenshots to delete at Category:Mac OS X screenshots if not, the screen shot page and the category should probably be re-written. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sylvain Dufresne - Janvier 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Blason Grenoble : retard mais OK !

Bonjour Kyro, J'ai vu ta correction hier matin et... oublié de labelliser ta photo hier soir. Mattbuck a été plus rapide que moi. Cela n'a pas d'importance mais il m'est arrivé d'avoir une ou deux photos "oubliées" et ça peut être désagréable, même si, à mon âge, on ne tient pas des comptes très précis. Pour ce qui est du blason, j'ai fait une suggestion (en petits caractères), mais je ne suis absolument pas spécialiste : j'ai juste fait une recherche sur Wikipédia, trouvé une possibilité et posé la question pour vérification éventuelle. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 09:41, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais du Parlement du Dauphiné - Blason.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (Isn't it the COA of the Dauphin de France?) -- Slightly tilted to the left imo (easy to fix). --JLPC 18:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC). New version. (And I asked is it was the COA you suggested) Kyro 18:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC) Looks OK to me. Mattbuck 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geneviève Fioraso - Février 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Think different - Hitchcock.jpg

File:Think different - Hitchcock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Mono 18:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Au Jardin des plantes de Grenoble

BONJOUR JE VOUDRAIS UTILISER VOTRE MAGNIFIQUE PHOTO POUR L'INTEGRER DANS UN DOSSIER SUR LE BETON.

DANS LE CADRE DE MES ETUDE LA HEAD DE GENVEVE, SUISSE.

MERCI

LISE

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:MilanoSanSiro02.JPG

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 06:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Kyro. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Magsafe box.jpg

File:Magsafe box.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Vera (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Kyro, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2001-2004 Headquarters for the press group Le Monde, Paris,.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

File:DBZ Battle of Gods.jpg

Bonjour,

J'ai importé ce fichier cependant j'ai été mal informé et l'image ne porte pas le bon titre. J'ai donc renommé la page mais ça n'a pas changé le nom, est-ce qu'il vous serez possible de vous en occuper, merci ?

Aussi, je tiens à dire que je n'ai pas l'habitude d'importer des images et je ne sais pas si j'ai bien fait cet ajout dans les règles. Comme vous êtes administrateur sur Commons, je m'adresse à vous directement. Cdlmt. --Skarock (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Merci pour le renommage. Cdlmt. --Skarock (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Eva Joly - Grenoble 2012.jpg

Bonjour, Je voudrais proposer cette photo comme Images de valeur pour Eva Joly, mais il faut qu'elle soit geolocalisée. Est-ce possible ? Je peux le faire si tu me dis où a été prise cette photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Idem pour File:Cécile Duflot - Grenoble 2012.jpg. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done Ajouté. Kyro (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

De-adminship

Dear Kyro,
it is with a regret that I inform you that, following our de-adminship policy, you had your administrator rights on Wikimedia Commons removed today by a Wikimedia steward.

I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your efforts and contributions in making Wikimedia Commons what it is today. If you'll feel like doing so at some point, please feel free to re-apply for adminship at COM:RFA. Again, thanks for all the help you gave us, and (hopefully) see you back soon! odder (talk) 23:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:IPhone 3G.png

File:IPhone 3G.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.173.217.15 15:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:MacBook Pros.jpg

Yours sincerely, –Totie (talk) 02:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Photo

Hello Kyro, your photo is there without attribution. All my best, --77.147.171.4 13:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

File:NASA Worm logo.svg

File:NASA Worm logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jadebenn (talk) 19:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Gordon Freeman.jpg was recently deleted

File:Gordon Freeman.jpg was recently deleted by Elcobbola, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Infomars.png

File:Infomars.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

mattbr 22:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

File:WorldWideWeb FSF GNU.png

File:WorldWideWeb FSF GNU.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Matr1x-101^{Pinging me doesn't hurt!} {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC)