Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

File:Services cricket team.jpg

 
File:Services cricket team.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Clean up

Can you clean up the backgrounds of File:Papeiha (1899).jpg and File:Henry Nott (1899).jpg so it is only their heads and the captions of their name beneath and turn it black and white? And oval crop File:James Wilson, Captain of the Duff (1904).jpg and File:Henry Nott (1904).jpg (just upload over original image, don't create a derivative since there is no need for the page; don't include the caption on this one just the image itself). Thanks!-

  • You are welcome! Precise directives are useful;) --Ras67 (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Can please clean up File:William Charles Keeaumoku Crowningburg, 1879.jpg, removing any noise, and some of the dots in the background.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Can you please clean up File:Caesar Kapaakea, photograph by Henry L. Chase.jpg to something like File:Kapaakea&Keohokālole.jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Віцебскія краявіды 12.jpg

 
File:Віцебскія краявіды 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.17.4.62 11:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Princess Elisabeth of Hesse, memorial drawing of her by Friedrich August von Kaulbach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File:BlasonBozic.gif

 
File:BlasonBozic.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 19:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

File:AcademicBuildingA&M.jpg

 
File:AcademicBuildingA&M.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

38.128.130.129 16:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rob-1.png

 
File:Rob-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 12:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Andy-2.png

 
File:Andy-2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 13:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Four Owyhean Youths3.jpg

Hello, could you possibly oval crop four individual images of File:Four Owyhean Youths3.jpg? And to restore and clean them of the yellowing stains, holes, blemishes. You can title them: File:George Tamoree3.jpg, File:William Tenooe3.jpg, File:John Honoree3.jpg, and File:Thomas Hoopoo3.jpg. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Also if you can perform a simple oval crop for these images: File:Queen Emma of Hawaii05.jpg, File:Kamehameha III(1).jpg and File:Kamehameha IV(1).jpg. Restoration is not necessary for these three. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:View of Honolulu, Oahu, Sandwich Islands (1843).jpg

Could you please clean, desaturate and restore this entire page without cropping and then upload that version over the existing file for records purpose. And then straighten and crop afterward and then upload the crop version over. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Can you straighten and crop these images but keep the frames around them? Thanks.

File:Stoskopf, Martin Zilliox.jpg

Lieber Ras67, könntest Du bitte so gut sein und das genannte Bild in eine png-Datei verwandeln? Besten Dank im Voraus!

Herzlich, --Edelseider (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Hab ich gemacht, aber wozu soll das gut sein? Die nachträgliche Konvertierung einer verlustbehafteten JPEG-Datei in eine verlustfreie PNG-Datei ist ziemlich sinnfrei. Kann SONYs PlayMemories Home keine gescannten Bilder als PNGs speichern? Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 00:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
    • Danke! Und: gute Frage! Ich weiß es (noch) nicht. Sollte ich mal ausprobieren, du hast Recht! --Edelseider (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Oregon

File:SKALITZER str.pdf

 
File:SKALITZER str.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebari (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:DuMont Affiliates 1949.png

 
File:DuMont Affiliates 1949.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

182.178.237.143 05:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Lunalilo, by Eiler Jurgensen.jpg

Can you straighten and crop File:Lunalilo, by Eiler Jurgensen.jpg and neutralize the color tone a bit between the two versions?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Can you clean and crop File:Lunalilo standing with cane, photograph by Henry L. Chase (1898).jpg? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Keoni Ana and Kamehameha III, c. 1850.jpg

Could you clean this up and improve the contrast a bit?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 11:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke

Hallo Ras67,

am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.

Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.

Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?

Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.

--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Basic structure.jpg

 
File:Basic structure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 22:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Madangarli Tharavad.png

 
File:Madangarli Tharavad.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Tharavad Jpg.jpg

 
File:Tharavad Jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hilary Hahn2.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hilary Hahn2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hilary Hahn2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Lazar Kaganovich.jpg

 
File:Lazar Kaganovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trust Is All You Need (talk) 06:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Haleiwa Hotel

Can you extract the SINGLE PAGE ORIGINAL JP2 TAR unprocessed version of this page from https://archive.org/details/historyofkeouaka00prat ? My computer seems unable to render it.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, JP2 is the plague. It consumes many processor time, i use XnView to convert it to TIFF for further processing. GIMP also reads this format. Warm regards. --Ras67 (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Ras67,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Regarding this image: File:Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia sitting in a chair, Lower dacha, Peterhof.jpg

The album in which this photo belongs to is dated 1910-11, so it can't be from 1915. It's also definitely not related to the photo of Maria on the other side. Tatiana's hair is not tied up, indicating that she wasn't 16 when the photo was taken. Wolcott (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, you're right, i was duped by her mature appearance and the same location. Only Maria's photo seems to be from 1915. Thank you for your mindfulness! --Ras67 (talk) 21:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

License Tags

Hi, you have tagged a number of images by a new user - such as File:The_White_Collared_Kingfisher.jpg - as far as I can see the uploader has put in the license field and seems to be the same person who uploaded the image to Flickr. Is there a reason for marking these files as lacking evidence of permission? Shyamal (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

  • It seems to be the same person; that's the point, everybody can create the account Antony Grossy and upload the copyrighted pictures. The pictures on Flickr are not free (All Rights Reserved), so that we need a proof that the photographer has agreed with the free licence on Commons! Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Ok. Maybe a suggestion to the user to change the license on Flickr might be useful. Shyamal (talk) 04:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Do not remove parts of historic artworks

For images like File:Cornelis Anthonisz. - Steps of Life (ca. 1550).jpg the edge "borders" are, in fact, inherent parts of the artwork and should not be cropped. Please don't do this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Emblem of Tamil Eelam.svg

 
File:Emblem of Tamil Eelam.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SpacemanSpiff 09:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Bishop Hermann Koeckemann

Can you crop, upload and then clean up this image a bit and then upload again? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

  • There are already crops with high quality. --Ras67 (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg

 
File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hop on Bananas (talk) 19:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Submarino S01.jpg

 
File:Submarino S01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 08:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Submarino S01.jpg

 
File:Submarino S01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amitie 10g (talk) 18:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Uploads from the Nasa Flickr page

The licensing that you used says "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". Looking at e.g. this image, which you uploaded to File:'The Martian' World Premiere (NHQ201509110006).jpg, it specifically says "CC BY-NC-ND 2.0", which is not compatible with Commons. I believe that would make the upload a copyvio. Nymf (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

  • All images on NASA's Flickr accounts are allegedly protected with CC BY-NC-(ND) 2.0 but this is not the case, see here! Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 23:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

File:JIMJONES1977.jpg

 
File:JIMJONES1977.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 11:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Jim Jones in front of the International Hotel.jpg

 
File:Jim Jones in front of the International Hotel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Jim Jones.jpg

 
File:Jim Jones.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 11:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Iqbalur Rahim MP.jpg

 
File:Iqbalur Rahim MP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Worldbruce (talk) 00:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Foxcroft School Middleburg Virginia.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Foxcroft School Middleburg Virginia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

I removed {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-old}} or similar templates from the files whose authors who died less then 70 years ago. Now the files have no license and unless it is fixed will be deleted in a week. If you know of other reason why those files are in public domain please feel free to add a new license template and alert me and I will remove {{no license}} tag. If you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your reverts to some of my edits

Hi Ras67.

Yesterday you reverted some of my edits. I would like to know the reason. I was thinking that it is not disired for photos on WikimediaCommons to have a border around them. The informaton would not be lost, if we remove the big border, as it is already in the file description. I also don't think the photos in question are pieces of art, so that the removal of the border "will violate the original artistic intent of the image" (Commons:Templates#Digital_editing_required -> "remove border")?

Regards --hdamm (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Hallo Heinrich, ich weiß nicht wo das Problem liegt (Cache, Proxy oder dgl.) aber ich habe die Dateien beschnitten und "remove border" entfernt. Du hast das wiederum zurückgesetzt, so dass jetzt „fertige“ Bilder zum erneuten Beschnitt standen, und genau das habe ich wiederum zurückgesetzt. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hallo – zu spät gesehen, dass Du ja auch Deutsch kannst ;-)
Ja ... ähh ... das verstehe ich jetzt auch nicht. Als ich vorhin nachsah, war jedenfalls der dicke Rahmen noch vorhanden. Egal, jetzt istes jedenfalls o.k.
Übrigens: in der Kategorie Category:Wat Nong Phian zu den drei Bildchen gibts noch welche ;-)
--hdamm (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Simple Subduction Zone.jpg

 
File:Simple Subduction Zone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

P 1 9 9   16:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Schloss Linderhof

Hallo Ras67, vielen Dank fürs rotieren...

Ich hab noch einige andere kleine Filme im Hochformat. Kannst Du mir nen Tipp geben wie ich diese Filme vorm hochladen drehen kann?

Gruß aus Köln

--1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Ja natürlich, das nachträgliche Umcodieren (Drehen) ist immer schlecht, da IMHO das verlustlose Drehen wie bei JPEG-Bildern bei Videos nicht möglich ist.
  1. Lade Deine Videos nicht als OGV sondern als WebM hoch, einfach weil es das bessere Format ist.
  2. Codiere Deine Videos mit der vollen Auflöung und maximal möglicher Bitrate um möglichst viel Qualität zu bewahren. Die MediaWiki-Software rechnet dann sowieso noch zusätzlich runtergerechnete Versionen aus, die dann von fast jedem Gerät abgespielt werden können. Limitierend könnten höchstens die Upload-Rate deines Internetzugangs oder Dateien größer als 100 MByte sein. Letztere kann ich nur über den Assistenten zum Hochladen von Dateien hochladen, wenn bei den Einstellungen Hochladen von Dateien, die größer als 5 MB sind, in mehreren Teilen aktiviert ist.
  3. Ich benutze zur Videocodierung FFmpeg, allerdings ist Kommandozeilen-Arbeit nicht jedermanns Sache.
  4. Der Umkodierungsbefehl des obigen Videos war:
  5. ffmpeg -i Wasserspiele_auf_Schloss_Linderhof.ogv -threads 4 -codec:a copy -b:v 5000k -vf "transpose=1" Wasserspiele_auf_Schloss_Linderhof_neu.ogv
  • -i Wasserspiele_auf_Schloss_Linderhof.ogv gibt die Input-Datei an.
  • -threads 4 Anzahl der Prozessoren im System, um die Berechnung zu beschleunigen.
  • -codec:a copy sagt, dass der Audiokanal unverändert übernommen, also „kopiert“ wird.
  • -b:v 5000k die Bitrate des Zielvideos
  • -vf "transpose=1" das ist der relevante Befehl, das Video wird um 90° nach Rechts gedreht.
  • Wasserspiele_auf_Schloss_Linderhof_neu.ogv Name des Zielvideos
  1. Entweder benutzt Du auch FFmpeg oder deine Software benutzt die Bibliothek davon, nämlich Lavf55.19.104.
  2. Du musst also beim Um-Encoden deiner Kameravideos irgendwie -vf "transpose=1" einfügen.
  3. Also z. B. ffmpeg -i MVI_0000.MOV -threads 4 -codec:a libvorbis -b:a 128k -codec:v libvpx -b:v 8000k -vf "transpose=1" MVI_0000_neu.webm
  4. Bei mir funktioniert obiger Befehl, allerdings muss das nicht bei jeder Version von FFmpeg so sein.

Falls noch Fragen auftauchen, kannst Du mich natürlich kontaktieren. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Ras67, nochmal vielen, vielen Dank für deine Mühen und Erklärungen...
Ich bin in die Cumputerei erst mit Windows Vista eingestiegen und arbeite eigentlich überhaupt nicht mit der Kommandozeile. Meinen derzeitigen Rechner habe ich etwas vorschnell auf Windfows 10 umgestellt und dort ist die Eingabeaufforderung auch nicht mehr da wo sie mal war (Startmenü)... Nach längerem suchen konnte ich die Eingabeaufforderung als Adresszeile in der Taskleiste wieder anzeigen lassen, aber mein Windows 10 kennt, auch nach Installation weiterer Codec-Packs, ffmpeg nicht.
Als kleinen Erfolg für mich bin ich aber über ein kleines Programm (Free Video Flip and Rotate) gestolpert welches ganz einfach Videos dreht.
Deinen Tipp Videos als .webm hochzuladen habe ich übernommen (hier konvertiere ich mit Any Video Converter und versuche die höchst mögliche Qualität einzustellen).
Noch ne Frage: soll ich das Linderhof-Video nochmal neu (als .webm) konvertieren und hochladen?
Danke nochmal und lieben Gruß aus Köln --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 23:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Hallo, mache ich die Beantwortung gleich mal rückwärts rum. Das Linderhof-Video nochmal neu als Webm hochzuladen ist an sich eine gute Idee, wenn Du es auch gleich drehen könntest. Wenn ich es drehen muss, kann ich maximal 6 Mbps an Qualität einstellen, da ich nur mit einer Datei unter 100 MByte überschreiben kann. Trotzdem müsste das noch eine höhere Qualität als jetzt ergeben, wenn Du vom Originalvideo mit hoher Bitrate neucodierst.
  • Any Video Converter und Free Video Flip and Rotate gibt’s bei Chip.de, allerdings wird vor Adware gewarnt, so dass ich mir die Programme nicht antun wollte.
  • Windows „kennt“ den Befehl ffmpeg erst, wenn selbiges Programm im Suchpfad von Windows liegt. Falls Du Interesse an der Installation und direkten Kodierung mit FFmpeg hast, sag’ es bitte.
  • Falls Du Dropbox einsetzt, könnte man auch mit einer Freigabe arbeiten, so dass ich Deine Originalvideos bearbeiten und abspeichern könnte. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 20:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Queen Victoria

Hello,, Mr. Ras67, I am writing to ask if you can download this picture in gettyimagines, depicting Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria in 1897, can download it,, because the copyright has expired for almost 100 years? --95.248.92.126 12:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

  • The copyright status is unclear! Who is E. P. Robson? Is he the photographer or is he the collector? On Commons the rules for PD are very strict. The photo must be PD in it's origin country and in the United States. You must prove that Robson or the true photographer died before 1945. It is possible to upload it to the en:wiki with the licence {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} but then you see it only in en:wiki! Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 16:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
It might not be classified as unknown because,, as if it were the home to which the photo you could put your link,, but if it were always the photographer may enter UNKNOWN, and with the copyright expired 100 years,,,,,,,,no sorry,, you look perhaps to have found at this time the 'author of photography, the names is (Enry Peach Robinson 1830-1901),, surely the words of getty images is spelled wrong on his name,, maybe he is the 'author of photography --95.248.92.126 16:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Doubtful Crumbs

Sorry, but your version is awful in colours. Take the one from the museum or do another upload, please; your version (from a postcard-seller!) now appears in a de-wp-article without any reason. Greetz, --Felistoria (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I can't understand you objection. On my computer with a relatively good flat panel display, the colors of the new version of this file are better! not worser as well as the resolution is higher. I can not see any impairment of the article Doubtful Crumbs! The file is on Commons so it spread the new version to all articles in the whole Wikipedia. Please explain the problem, gern in Deutsch! --Ras67 (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Have you ever been in the museum in London? Have you ever seen the original? You can of course upload another version if you want to, but you cannot tell me (I am the author of the de-article and I know the original) which version is better. In de-wp we do not take postcards if there is a museum's version. And I do not want your version automatically in my article (which won a prize, but this won't tell you anything I think). Have a good night, --Felistoria (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
"My version" is from the Museums' same scan like the first version, only in higher resolution! No postcard is involved. What is worse with the colors, the saturation? Here is the original in the museum, where are the problems with the colors? Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 00:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Sehe erst jetzt, dass ich auch auf Deutsch schreiben kann;-) Also: das Foto mit Rahmen ist grottenschlecht. Kannst Du gerne behalten. Und ja: es gibt oft mehrere Versionen bei Commons, aber zur Auswahl und das ist auch gut so. Ich mach das schon, aber dann lass bitte die Finger davon, danke. Mit Gruß zur Nacht, --Felistoria (talk) 00:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Das Foto im Rahmen ist wirklich nicht übermäßig gut, aber ich weiß immer noch nicht was jetzt an der neuen Version so schlecht sein soll, vor allem da es auch vom Museum stammt und deine und meine Version vom selben Urscan bzw. Foto stammen. Der Bildausschnitt ist exakt! der selbe. Das neue Bild hat mehr als die doppelte Auflösung und man kann viel mehr Details erkennen. Sage mir doch bitte, was ich an der neuen Version verändern soll, damit es der Realität besser entpricht. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 00:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Auf jeden Fall hast du da die Copyright- und Nutzungsbedingungen der Public Catalogue Foundation mitkopiert, unter denen wir das Bild nicht akzeptieren können. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Ja, das habe ich der Vollständigkeit halber gemacht, damit jeder gewarnt ist z. B. in England, auch in Deutschland ist man ja jetzt der Meinung, auf gemeinfreie Bilder ein Uhrheber- bzw. Verlagsrecht zu erheben. Commons sieht sich daran aber nicht gebunden, siehe COM:PDARTREUSE. --Ras67 (talk) 01:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Ich folge in der Sache Reinhard Kraasch: de-WP nimmt keine Werkabbildungen mit einem Copyright. Die Version, mit der Du mein altes Upload (von der Homepage der Wallace Collection 2010) überschrieben hast, stammt auch nicht aus der von Dir angegebenen Quelle (der Fotocommunity, geschweige denn aus dem Museum), sondern von der Homepage der BBC "Your Painting", ist im Artikel verlinkt). Diese Version (auch nur etwas größer und etwas "weicher" in den Farben) habe ich ebenfalls auf der Festplatte, allerdings übernommen von der Seite der BBC. Zur Praxis britischer Museen: man zeigt gemeinfreie Werke des Bestands auf den hauseigenen Homepages i.d.R. in für eine Abbildung so eben brauchbaren Größen, die aber für einen hochwertigen Druck (z. B. einen Kunstband o.ä.) zu klein sind; dafür muss man eine druckfähige Version beim Museum erwerben, und die ist oft sehr teuer. Auch werden nicht selten die Farben ganz leicht abgeschwächt auf den Homepages angeboten, wie's hier bei der von mir erneut hochgeladenen (und nun im Artikel verlinkten) Museumsversion der Fall ist. In de-WP haben wir uns in der Kunst geeinigt, dass wir, sofern vorhanden, die Abbildungen des Museums nehmen, auch, weil man schließlich nicht mit dem Laptop zum Vergleich mal eben nach New York, London oder Paris jetten kann. Und noch etwas: man kann ohne weiteres eine weitere Version hochladen und muss nicht mit "seiner" überschreiben und diese in einen in den letzten Tagen durch den Wettbewerb in vierstelliger Zahl abgerufenen Artikel einfach hineinstehlen. Das ist nicht seriös. Der Artikel hat eine Diskussionsseite und ich hab auch eine, auch hier bei Commons. Danke fürs Verständnis gewissen Unmuts. Mit Gruß, --Felistoria (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok, da das Bild schon 5½ Jahre auf Commons lag, konnte ich nicht ahnen, dass man sich auf eine Farbversion auf De geinigt hatte, bzw. dass das so eine große Rolle spielt. Der Wettbewerb war mir nicht bekannt und „hineinstehlen“ wollte ich auch nichts. Ich habe schlichtweg nur gedacht, dass „meine“ Version besser ist und ich mich im Rahmen von COM:OVERWRITE befinde, dass es nicht so war, Sorry. Wenn ich Deine Ausführungen richtig verstanden habe, ist die jetzige „meine“ Commons-Version die farblich nicht abgeschwächte Version. Da könnte sie auf Commons auch so bleiben oder soll sie noch mal extra hochgeladen werden und dann alles zurückgesetzt werden? Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 16:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Naja, ich hab' nicht selten "bessere" Versionen hochgeladen - aber immer als eigene Datei mit Verweis auf "other versions", vor allem, wenn eine "alte" Abb. bereits in einem de-Artikel vorhanden war. Unterdessen, glaub' ich, hat sich die Sache geregelt: "meine" alten Versionen wurden aus der Vorläufer-Historie Deines Uploads gelöscht, ich habe die Quelle korrigiert und "other versions" verlinkt. Da die Metadaten noch einen (das Werk nicht betreffenden) Copyrightvermerk haben, hab' ich bei de-wp die andere Version genommen. Was Wikidata, en-wp und Commons machen (nach wie vor verlinkt), mögen die selber entscheiden. Warum ich gestern etwas "angefressen" hier bei Dir aufgeschlagen bin: anderthalb Monate stand der kleine Artikel bei de-wp im ANR, hatte sogar kurz eine QS durchlaufen wg. von mir vergessener Kats, hatte dann mehrere Wochen im "Miniaturenwettbewerb" mitgemacht und den vor 3 Tagen gewonnen. Und just gestern wurde er von jemandem verschoben (weil das Lemma eine Klammer hatte, die wochenlang niemanden gestört hatte), dadurch Verlust der Abrufdaten, die nunmehr auf einer Weiterleitung stehen, und dann noch die geänderte Bilddatei - da wurd' ich dann doch etwas raschelig über so viel hektischen (und mMn ahnungslosen) Aktionismus. Passiert, daher bitte nix für ungut. Kurz: musst nichts mehr ändern. Beste Grüße, --Felistoria (talk) 18:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Darbarhafiz.jpg

 
File:Darbarhafiz.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Oxford Street, looking west from Duke Street. Site of Selfridges on the right.jpg

 
File:Oxford Street, looking west from Duke Street. Site of Selfridges on the right.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:'The Martian' World Premiere (NHQ201509110004).jpg

 
File:'The Martian' World Premiere (NHQ201509110004).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Error (talk) 01:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Chen Kun 2007.jpg

 
File:Chen Kun 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Queryzo (talk) 11:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Sultan Alp Arslan.jpg

 
File:Sultan Alp Arslan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fut.Perf. 08:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

File:André Bacqué.jpg

Hello. Thanks for your watchfulness, but is it possible that this 106 years old film is not now in public domain ? User:Fredojoda

File:Entrada Principal.jpg

 
File:Entrada Principal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 11:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Two Emperors

Mr. prejudice. Ras 67, I am writing because I saw that you can upload images of historical GETTYIMAGINES,, I'd like to ask if it would file the copyright expired,, because I would see it loaded on the entry of commons,, I had done research on 'image but nothing, I from my point of view I think that the 'image has copyright expired, what do you think? :)--95.232.81.23 20:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes, the copyright of this image is expired like this one. You can upload it to Commons without problems. But either all images have watermarks or are in low resolution, this is not good for Commons. Warm regards. --Ras67 (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
grazie dell' informazione,, almeno dato che tutto è Ok potrebbe caricarla lo stesso? :)--95.232.81.23 21:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand Italian, but you have to upload it to Commons. You have to create an account on it and wait a couple of days. --Ras67 (talk) 21:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I know that you have to upload it to the commons, but recently I have deleted all the files I uploaded to commons,, I sincerely do not think of being able,, I ask her?--95.232.81.23 21:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, i don't understand your desire. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 22:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I would like you to load this file I sent (that's all) cordial greetings--95.244.103.221 12:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, i don't upload copyfraud burdened images on demand. --Ras67 (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Old Pitman House at Hilo.jpg

 
File:Old Pitman House at Hilo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Zwaveldampen (9520820275).jpg

Hello.I am sorry.I did not know that this is a slope.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

  • No problem, mistakes happen. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Baikonur Cosmodrome

Hi Ras, just wondering why you are removing the Baikonur Cosmodrome category from some images. I see most are being moved to specific launch pad subcategories, but other images have the location category removed entirely, such as File:Soyuz TMA-13 spacecraft is transported by railcar.jpg and File:Soyuz TMA-11M in Baikonur processing facility (201311040014HQ).jpg. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the intent, but that seems akin to removing an image from the Kennedy Space Center category simply because it didn't fit into the SLC-39 subcat. Huntster (t @ c) 15:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes it's a tightrope-walk, but i thought the special categories like Soyuz TMA-11M and so on are better as the general cat Baikonur Cosmodrome. Otherwise we would have thousands of pictures in that category. Warm regards. --Ras67 (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I would agree, but the individual Soyuz missions are not (for some odd reason) categorised by location, only as part of the Soyuz program and sometimes by the ISS Expedition number. Even then, an image of the processing facility should probably not be only in a launch pad category...perhaps some additional cats should be created? Huntster (t @ c) 16:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes we have enough images within the processing facility so that an own cat is suitable. --Ras67 (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Dusit residence dubai marina

The photo of this property was taken with my phone camera and why god had requested for deleting this? Ferozeea (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

  • You have no property of the architect's copyright, your photo is a derivative work of his copyrighted work, so you can't release this under a free licence, see Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

BMacZero (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Qolamali haddad adel.jpg

 
File:Qolamali haddad adel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Boulevard Plaza, Dubai, UAE.jpg

and all files in Category:Files from Aedas Flickr stream. Please note that the Flickr stream is from the architect, so we already have a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately everybody can affirm that he is Aedas. Have we an OTRS permission that the claim was confirmed, and when yes, why this is not in the description page. There is only a allegation that allegedly all is correct. Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Portrait of Victor Emmanuel II of Savoy

prejudice Mr. Ras67 I am writing to ask if she could load this portrait found on gettyimages made by Michele Gordigiani (1835-1909),is a portrait that I personally can not load, since you can upload photos and paintings of gettyimages,, could charge? please LINK: http://www.gettyimages.it/license/534967555 --95.232.81.196 19:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't upload copyfraud burdened images on demand from me unknown persons! Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 16:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
therefore see that the following portrait of copyright has expired at least 100, why it holds--82.50.38.107 19:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Henri Jouf & Charles Denner.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Henri Jouf & Charles Denner.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Henri Jouf & Charles Denner.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Queryzo (talk) 11:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Gavrilo princip.jpg

 
File:Gavrilo princip.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 08:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sviet staff 2012.png

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sviet staff 2012.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sviet staff 2012.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Visegrádi János.JPG

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Visegrádi János.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Visegrádi János.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BMacZero (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:ISS-45 StoryOfWater, Colors Patiently Swirl - Haditha Dam Lake.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ISS-45 StoryOfWater, Colors Patiently Swirl - Haditha Dam Lake.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

VP9/Opus

Sorry, VP9/Opus encoding with my tool is still quite experimental. Please use VP8/Vorbis for now (it's much faster to encode) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Thomas Pesquet, official portrait (1).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Pesquet, official portrait (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mohar&Gianiji.jpg

 
File:Mohar&Gianiji.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nunabas (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Favorite Wikipedian.

You are my favorite wikipedian. Please leave a message on my talk page. (F29ly (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)) F29ly (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Bulgar warrior.jpg

 
File:Bulgar warrior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 12:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Reagan Boraxo.gif

 
File:Reagan Boraxo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Plus cher qu'un Happy Meal mais j'avais trop faim pour attendre l'habituel McDo post-billard... (7068502929).jpg

 
File:Plus cher qu'un Happy Meal mais j'avais trop faim pour attendre l'habituel McDo post-billard... (7068502929).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 12:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion Files Graffiti in Mogliano

Sorry, but why? There are no copyright over these images, they're graffiti, free graffiti on a public wall, legal made. I don't understand. -- Il Passeggero - I love to love you 09:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

In Italy there's copyright only over architectural works, as I know, not on graffiti on a wall. Mine aren't pictures of architectural works. -- Il Passeggero - I love to love you 09:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Graffiti and Murals are not allowed on Commons with the exception of freedom of panorama, but this is not the case in Italy. Furthermore derivative works of copyrighted characters are also forbidden. --Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Armoiries des Iles Cook.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries des Iles Cook.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Armoiries des Iles Cook.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Ariobarzan statue in Yasuj.jpg

 
File:Ariobarzan statue in Yasuj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Poké95 11:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Isaac Folorunso Adewole.jpg

 
File:Isaac Folorunso Adewole.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smartse (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

  Let's pretend this beer is Russian; thank you for pointing out my error. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:SpaceX CRS-8 Falcon 9 Rocket on Dragon Return to Flight.webm

 
File:SpaceX CRS-8 Falcon 9 Rocket on Dragon Return to Flight.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 01:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gaspar van Wittel 002.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gaspar van Wittel 002.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Bette Davis & John Garfield.JPG

 
File:Bette Davis & John Garfield.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amitie 10g (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Ras67,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

File:2012 Wien 0256 (8302659653).jpg

 
File:2012 Wien 0256 (8302659653).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oxtobear (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Soyuz TM-32 crew.jpg

 
File:Soyuz TM-32 crew.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Keilana (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Robert Genin - Arbeitende Frauen.jpg

Hallo Ras67! Ich habe noch keine Erfahrung im wiki-"talk" - aber hoffentlich sehen Sie diese Mitteilung. Die Datierung auf dem Bild "Arbeitende Frauen" ist mit fremder Hand gesetzt, der Bleistift unterscheidet sich von dem der Signatur. Das kann man auf einem besser aufgelösten Bild deutlich sehen. Ausserdem ist das zweite "3" in "1933" über eine andere Ziffer geschrieben (vermutlich "1"). 1913 könnte also stimmen. Aber das zweite Bild "Arbeitende Männer" war mit einer grossen Wahrscheinlichkeit in der Sonderbundausstellung 1912 in Köln present unter dem Namen "Sackträger".

Und das wichtigste: Genin schrieb in seiner Autobiografie, dass er nach dem Ausbruch des I. Weltkriegs aufgehört hat, die nackten idealen Menschen in paradiesischen Landschaften zu malen. Diese Manier ist nur in seinem Werk 1911-1914 zu finden, danach hat er ganz anders gemalt und gezeichnet.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodionofff (talk • contribs) 12:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Danke für die prompte Antwort, ich hab ja schon an Ihrer Arbeit hier bei Wikipedia gesehen, dass sie nicht nur Experte, sondern auch Besitzer eines großen Teils von Genins Arbeiten sind, also genau der richtige Mann! Das Entstehungsdatum war mir nur wichtig, weil leider die Arbeiten nach 1923 theoretisch auf Grund der URAA-Problematik gelöscht werden könnten. Durch Ihre Feststellung sind zumindest diese Bilder definitiv gemeinfrei, Danke! Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 12:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Habe die Datierungen angegeben, haben Sie gesehen? Viele Grüße Rodionofff (talk)
  • Ja, vielen Dank! Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 12:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Reicht es dass ich nur in meiner Talk-Seite schreibe oder soll ich auch hier eine Spur hinterlassen? Gruss Rodionofff (talk)
  • Ihre Seite reicht vollkommen, da ich sie "beobachte". --Ras67 (talk) 12:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Overwriting

Hi, Ras67! Please, upload this file into another filename as far as you are willing to remove artist's signature. Read please COM:OVERWRITE, specifically the "Removing parts of historical images" part. Trying to summarize that: we do not remove signatures from old drawings and overwrite the file (paintings, drawings, cartoons,...), we do remove watermarks of no-one-guys from contemporary photographs. If you want the signature removed, please upload another file. Best regards! Strakhov (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but i know COM:OVERWRITE very good. I think, the name was added by the restorer of the Liberator magazin. An "artist's signature" can't be consist of italic Georgia font. The font is from 1993, so it seems subsequently added to the signature less original. You can see this on the consecutive picture in the Liberator magazin, page 10, PDF page 13. At left is the original handwritten signature, at right is the modern supplement with the Georgia typeface. So i have removed a modern supplement, not an artist signature. Best regards too! --Ras67 (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but you did not overwrite a drawing taken from a modern supplement from 1993, but a 1921-non-restored original from Marxists.org archive instead, as source stated. And, if you know that well COM:OVERWRITE, you'll know restorations (how could I know it was a restoration if you don't include or cite or anything... any source?) are not allowed to overwrite other files ...and you have to upload them under other filename. Regards. Strakhov (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC) If you believe this pdf is by any means restored in 1993 and someone took care of adding signatures and that stuff to every single drawing... what's the source of your claim?
The "source" is only common sense. The font Georgia did not exist in 1921 and it is completely distinguishable from all other font types in the magazin's text. The drawing was already restored and IMHO supplemented with the text "Hugo Gellert" in 2014. You mean, "Hugo Gellert" in a computer typeface is an artist's signature? I would think, it have to be handwritten. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm not a font expert and I don't know how unique and special is Georgia typefont and if a **ing computer was needed to put that two words there or not. To me they are all are pretty similar. In fact it's similar (size, aspect,...) to the one above ("Genevieve Taggard" original or restored too? but "inclined"). Anyways, I reverted myself and put your version, but as stated I'm not convinced at all since restored or not that signature it's the only proof we had of that picture being made by Gellert. Regards. Strakhov (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I misunderstood you. Well. Maybe you are right. There are other drawings with two signatures, the one in "George typeface" and the more artistic one. Anyways, claiming that signature was put there in the "modern restoration" is kind of original research and, in case of doubt, it's better uploading another file. I think. Regards and thanks for your commments. Strakhov (talk) 12:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Victor Jory as Oberon, 1935.png

 
File:Victor Jory as Oberon, 1935.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

File:It's so funny!.jpg

 
File:It's so funny!.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 20:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File:It's so funny!.jpg

 
File:It's so funny!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Electron   21:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, –Davey2010Talk 23:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Roberta Kathleen Parks, 1974.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Roberta Kathleen Parks, 1974.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Roberta Kathleen Parks, 1974.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Japanesecrewmen.jpg

 
File:Japanesecrewmen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Huntster (t @ c) 17:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Tahtaha.jpg

 
File:Tahtaha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lomita (talk) 16:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Croppen und nicken

Lieber Ras67, wärst du so gut und könntest dieses Bild angemessen beschneiden? Ich danke dir! Herzlich, --Edelseider (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Bitteschön, das mit den zusätzlichen Bildern ausschneiden war wohl vermutlich ein Versehen. --Ras67 (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Savitha Reddy in 2014.JPG

 
File:Savitha Reddy in 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Holzleiste

Hallo Ras67, der Kollege MagentaGreen hat für mich in der Fotowerkstatt diese eingescannte Abbildung verschönert: File:Buhl Altarpiece Last Judgment (retouched).jpg. In der Mitte des Bildes verläuft eine Holzleiste, die es in zwei teilt. Die Frage ist - meinst Du, man kann sie als de minimis so stehen lassen? Oder sollte man - im gegebene Fall, Du - sie herausoperieren? Danke für dein Dazutun; herzliche Grüße, --Edelseider (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Das ist noch nicht mal de minimis, sondern weit unterhalb der für urheberrechtlichen Schutz geforderten Schöpfungshöhe. Also ich sehe da keine Probleme. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 11:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Ras67/Archive 4".