User talk:Rubin16/2021

FoP-related deletion requests

Здравствуйте, Линар, заранее поздравляю с возвращением в ряды администраторов. Хочу напомнить -- пожалуйста, не забывайте добавлять категорию Russian FOP cases/pending в номинации на удаление по несвободе панорамы в России. Вот как здесь, это необходимо, чтобы удалённые файлы в перспективе можно было легко найти, когда придётся их восстанавливать. --A.Savin 18:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

• здравствуйте! Ок, спасибо, ещё посмотрю свой недавний вклад и тоже добавлю, где потребуется. rubin16 (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

---

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Rubin16, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 11:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Let's start working. rubin16 (talk) 12:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Stanishevsky Andrey Vladimirovich.jpg

Салют, у этой фотографии всё нормально с лицензией, её сделала дочь этого человека, которой написали по поводу лицензии и она ещё не успела отправить в OTRS запрос. Они переписывались на её СО с EugeneZelenko и она не может понять, что делать — в образце письма в OTRS нет её случая (она сделала фото и никогда его не публиковала, см. её СО, там всё раписано). Что ей делать, чтобы фото восстановили, что писать OTRSникам, просто в свободной форме? — Le Loy (talk) 21:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

привет. По логике, когда фото сделано самим загружающим и ранее не публиковалось, то OTRS не нужно и можно загружать напрямую. Но действительно существует большая предвзятость к таким фотографиям, так как чаще всего они просто взяты откуда то (помнишь, СЕМАРХИВ в ру.вики?). Тут ответы человека логичны, я просто восстановил. Из чего-то близкого вашему случаю, есть en:Wikipedia:Contact_us/Licensing и photosubmissions, но тут человек и сам загрузил уже. rubin16 (talk) 05:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Супер, большое спасибо! — Le Loy (talk) 09:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Camp Crawford, Sapporo, Japan - 1951.tif|thumb|Camp Crawford in the Makomanai area outside Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

You deleted this file from my Wikimedia Commons image list, which resulted in its deletion from Wikipedia's 187th Infantry Regiment article. Your reasoning was "No license since 27 December 2020." Please refer to Rights Statement on the Lafayette College Library's Digital Repository page for the image at https://ldr.lafayette.edu/concern/images/1544bq525 and the Rights Statement at https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/?language=en. IMO, no permission is required from the rights-holder(s) for educational uses. Charles Shaulis (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Educational purpose isn't enough to allow uploading here, we need clear permission for any usage, distribution or edition of the image, including commercial purposes. You can have a look - Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses rubin16 (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough Charles Shaulis (talk) 09:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

File:01-Hesam-Fetrati-Portrate.jpg

Hi Rubin,

you recently deleted that file. We now received a permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021011510001492. The client is the protrayed person himself, and he claims that the picture is a selfie. Can you please restore the picture, if you think that the claim is credible? I will then put the permission tag into it.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I have restored it, thank you rubin16 (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо ;-) --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

License review

Hello @Rubin16: I hope you're doing well. I have checked some files for license review which are good. Have a look at User:C1K98V/Sandbox. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 11:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

GOT WHALED LOL

Template:Whale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallencow30 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Nice :) rubin16 (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Donald Flywell Malanga's photo

Hi Rubin16, you deleted the image Donald Flywell Malanga (and its related cropped image) on 16 January 2021, stating that no OTRS permission had been received since 25 December 2020. However, the author of the photograph had sent his permission email to OTRS many weeks earlier, and was sent a receipt on 1 December 2020, ticket #2020120110011891. Could you check, please? It's possible the middle name was misspelt in the OTRS receipt as "Flywel". many thanks, Anasuyas (talk) 17:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey. I have asked OTRS agents to check - Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Donald_Flywell_Malanga.jpg_and_File:Donald_Flywell_Malanga_(cropped).jpg. rubin16 (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks much! Anasuyas (talk) 12:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Rubin16,

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a draft policy (available in many languages). We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am perfectly aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion request, files from FAO

Hi, please undelete the following files, we have received a valid OTRS release email. I will the OTRS info asap after you undelete.

• File:Global forest expansion and deforestation 1990–2020 (million hectares per year).svg
• File:Global distribution of forests showing the ten countries with the largest forest area, 2020 (million hectares and % of world’s forests).svg
• File:Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation by region, 2000–2010.svg
• File:Proportion of forest area by forest area density class and global ecological zone, 2015.svg
• File:Percentage of forest in legally protected areas, 2020.svg
• File:Overall decline in a forest-specialist index for 268 forest vertebrate species (455 populations), 1970–2014.svg

KCVelaga (talk · mail) 07:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@KCVelaga done, thank you rubin16 (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, updated with relevant details. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 09:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Rubin16

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Выставление на удаление

Автор дал разрешение «Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0» смотрите описание.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Здравствуйте. Я смотрел, там по всем ссылкам было «содержимое недоступно» rubin16 (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Собственно, ссылка в вашем сообщении тоже выдаёт «Возможно, вы воспользовались недействительной ссылкой или страница была удалена.» rubin16 (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Проверьте пожалуйста ссылку. Там все фотки. Оказывается пост был "только для друзей".--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

спасибо! rubin16 (talk) 04:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

П. Татарнікаў files

• File:П. Татарнікаў. Іказнь. Замак. Да 1589 года. Паводле Тамаша Макоўскага.jpg
• File:П. Татарнікаў. Іказнь. Замак, першая палова (будаўніцтва Івана Сапегі) - сярэдзіна XVI ст.jpg
• File:П. Татарнікаў. Іказнь. Замак г. 1590-я. Перабудова Льва Сапегі.jpg
• File:П. Татарнікаў. Іказнь. Замак і падзамча. 1629. Перабудова Яна Станіслава Сапегі.jpg

You tagged these files as failing license review, but the source says they're CC-BY-SA-3.0 (under See More). I passed them for now, but wanted to make sure I'm not missing something. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. I haven’t noticed it there when reviewing, then uploader notified me and I was going to revert my edits when back to computer. Thanks for being quick :) rubin16 (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

file delited?

why did you delited this file? [1] I have explained that it doe's not violating any copyright in the file talk.... Nizzan Cohen (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

the Histadrut old symbol is more than 100 years old and today it is not in use... there are other works on wikimedia which uses it... Nizzan Cohen (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

hello. where can I see the source that this image is more than 100 years old, please? Nothing in the source in the description of the image said about it. rubin16 (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Padam Sundas.jpg

You deleted the image of Padam Sundas on 5 February 2021 citing that there were no sources for the photo even though Jagaran Media Center had clearly been stated as the source. Can you please restore the picture? Thanks. --CapricornxPisces (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

hello. we need more specific source, not just "Jagaran Media Center" but an exact source to the place/site/publication/blog post or something where this image was published. And that source should prove that Jagaran Media Center explicitly stated cc-by-sa-4.0 as license. rubin16 (talk) 08:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Edgar Kupfer-Koberwitz (Sardinien um 1972)-1.jpg

Hi, as I occasionally support the responsible it:User:Checconent, may I politely ask why files File:Edgar Kupfer-Koberwitz (Sardinien um 1972)-1.jpg and File:Edgar Kupfer-Koberwitz (Sardinien um 1972)-2.jpg have been deleted: "(Source of derivative work not specified since 1 February 2021) "; however, I cannot / no longer see what may have been missing. -- Thanks --HReuter (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

hello, the image descriptions were claimed to be created in 2020/2021 and to be own work but obviously were old photos from 1970-1980-s. We need more information about how, when these photos were done and who was the original author. Thank you rubin16 (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Third opinion request

Hi Rubin16. I've started three discussions (1, 2, 3) after a small-scale edit war. Could you please give your opinion? Thanks in advance.--BSRF (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Rubin16,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Ghazal Omid nature photography. Alaska.jpg

Hi; I kept that file back in 2012 per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ghazal Omid nature photography. Alaska.jpg. Now, User:Hanooz added a "missing permission" tag to the file on 25 February, although it IMHO has a valid license, and you deleted on 5 March as "No permission since 25 February 2021". Maybe you would consider undeleting it? Gestumblindi (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I agree with your argument that low resolution and lack of EXIF isn't enough and I generally assume good faith. Here, as far as I remember, there was a set of files to be deleted, and I have found one or two of them by google images published elsewhere. After that I decided to delete all of them there. rubin16 (talk) 17:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply; as that file has been here on Commons for such a long time (nearly 10 years), are you sure that, if you found it elsewhere via Google Images, it was not taken from here (might also apply to other images; after a few years, legitimate Commons photos often appear on other websites)? At least it seems that in 2012 (per Funfood), the photograph wasn't found elsewhere. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

I have restored the photo, your arguments are reasonable for me, thank you. rubin16 (talk) 08:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, too, it's always nice to have a pleasant exchange on such matters :-). I haven't looked closely at the other uploads by Ghazal Omid, but these seem to be on Commons for quite some time, too, and the uploader went to the lengths of adding their name to the file names, so possibly these might actually be okay, too? Gestumblindi (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

not sure about portrait photos: that were the ones that were also published elsewhere. It is possible that they were just reposted from Commons but it is difficult to be sure, I would better get OTRS review here or better getting higher resolution photos to be sure that they weren't just copied rubin16 (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Строительство чаши бассейна.jpg

The source is Wikimapia, it is indicated from the moment of loading and was there when you created the alert. Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 covers all Wikimapia imagery --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 12:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

• I saw it, but we need a link to the page where image posted, not a direct link to the file itself. rubin16 (talk) 12:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Ester Kaminskaya.jpg

Dear Rubin. It is very easy to put the tag "Delete". Before doing it, you must see that in Poland there is a special legislation concerning copyright. On the other hand, please explain how to put the image on "deletion request". It is not clear at all. --FLLL (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

It is important to add the relevant source information and the template you use says it, too. "Please provide where and when the image was first published". The website you provided just uses the picture but gives no information about the actual date and place of image publication, that's why we need the source for that. Otherwise it could be possible that image was first published in 2010 (for example) and it is not in public domain. rubin16 (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

File:은지원 - 2018.jpg

Hello. We are free to use https://twitter.com/_eunro_ Eunro's photos of singer Eun JiWon as long as the credit logo is not cropped. It says on her twitter page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkie27 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of redirect

Hi,

I'm not sure to understand why you denied the deletion of the redirect by it's author on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plante inconnue Bourg d'Oueil bord D51.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plante inconnue Bourg d'Oueil bord D51 (1).jpg. A DR was not needed but I see no reason to refuse to delete these redirects. Actually, it's seems rather pretty usual to me, am I missing something?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

hello. Commons:File_renaming#Leaving_redirects: I don't think that these requests do answer any of the points there rubin16 (talk) 11:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

It does answer the point G2 of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion, there two guidelines are not consistent with each other :/ I'll ask on the village pump. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

My understanding is that G2 is for unused and incorrect redirect, like having "Britney_Spears" redirecting to "Madonna". rubin16 (talk) 13:07, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Pomáhej s Igráčkem figurky.jpg

Hi, I don't understand why the file mentioned above was deleted despite all comments] (2) were asking to keep it with valid reasons. Is there a way to have this action reconsidered? Aloxe (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. The valid reason was stated in the nomination itself - COM:TOYS. You can appeal the decision on COM:UNDEL. rubin16 (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyvio

Can someone get blocked if they comitted copyvios three times even if they uploaded them a long time ago? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

The user needs to be warned about that and if continues to upload such files after warnings, he/she could be blocked. rubin16 (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

The user I am talking about had ignored copyvio warnings in the past back in 2017 and this year, he received copyvio violations. Just look at the past revisions of the talk page and you can see he is being warned multiple times about copyrighted logos. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

How about they block you instead for repeatedly (3 times now) posting revenge complaints about a specific user? Both previous complaints of yours were ignored because they had no basis. Now you are at it again? This is a clear personal attack towards me and it goes against Commons rules per COM:NPA. Kj1595 (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

the block is used for prevention, not a punishment. The last warning was 2 weeks ago and I see no violations since that. Even not reviewing the details of your communications and validity of the last warning itself, there is no sufficient base for any blocks rubin16 (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Йосип Пероганич.jpg

Dear Rubin16, please restore for a while or send me to perohanychgmail.com photo of my father, which was taken by my mom in 1967. I can not find the original picture, but it is of great value for our family. As far as I remember, it was my mom, who uploaded the file with my help. And I do not know what was wrong with the file. --Perohanych (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, the file was sent to you by e-mail. I will give a more complete answer tomorrow, now going to sleep, sorry. rubin16 (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Огромное спасибо! Моему отцу завтра 84, и фото на головной странице "моей" Энциклопедии Носовщины (ЭН) будет ему подарком http://wikinosivka.info/index.php/18_квітня

Только мне пришлось сейчас загрузить это фото на сайт ЭН, ранее оно подтягивалось с Викисклада

Не пойму, что было не так с фото. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Halpero это моя мама, супруга Иосифа. Мы с ней вдвоем загружали ее снимок ее супруга. Отец с начала 1960-х занимался фотографией. Этот его портрет снимала мама, а папа проявлял и закреплял плёнку, потом печатал фотографии. Фото с фото делал я. --Perohanych (talk) 12:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

добрый день! 99% подобных старинных фотографий, которые к нам загружаются, - это чужие работы неизвестного авторства, которые просто хранились в семейном архиве, но согласия автора нет и быть не может (так как уже никто не знает, кто был автором). Поэтому по умолчанию такие фотографии у новичков или пользователей, которые не показали другими загрузками, что действительно понимают правила работы Викисклада, удаляются. Ваши пояснения понятны, логичны и выглядят разумными, я восстановлю изображение сейчас rubin16 (talk) 13:15, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Im26-2.jpg, self-reference deleted?

Dear Rubin16, you marked File:Im26-2.jpg as missing evidence for permission. It was apparently copied to Commons from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Im26-2.jpg, where it was originally uploaded as CC-0 – but you yourself https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Im26-2.jpg&action=history deleted the file, along with the evidence of permission. Am I missing something? --stk (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey. I just wanted to avoid double deletion requests both in ru.wiki and here. The ru.wiki file was uploaded by User:Sssaaa111 and referred to "Andrey228" as an author. The file could be found on various websites where it was also posted long time ago (so, not copied from Wikimedia projects). The only proof of the fact that there was a permission from the author was this edit that I can't consider as a reasonable proof: it was an only edit from a new account. In all cases, we needed OTRS here, there were no evidence of being free both in ru.wiki and Commons, so, I just deleted one to take care of one DR, not two. I hope it helps. rubin16 (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

I thought my file was useless.

I thought File:Cityscape of Sanggye-dong.jpg was useless.

This file is a useful photo that can be used as a cityscape photo of an urban redevelopment in progress.

Thank you for keeping it without deleting it.

Ox1997cow (talk) 10:15, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Surge of Power

Please could the recently deleted file File:A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 15th July 2020.jpg be uploaded to enwiki - using a fair use argument for the depiction of the statue and using the pre-existing licensing for the photograph. --LukeSurl (talk) 11:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

probably yes. I am not so good in fair-use policy of en.wiki but it looks like en:Template:Non-free 3D art is aimed for that. I can send you the file with its description by email if needed. rubin16 (talk) 13:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes please, if you email me this I will do the upload on enwiki. Thank you. --LukeSurl (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done rubin16 (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

copyvio

Hi. A user has uploaded images that violate copyright. My labelled on the files have also been reverted. Even though I have informed it on the local wiki. You can see related files on User talk:Luisao Araujo page. Just wanted to let you know. --𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

@𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 hello, I have deleted files and warned the user, thank you rubin16 (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Bad deletion

I can't believe you would delete File:Atlas Building.jpg. I am a respected 10+-year photographer and editor on Wikimedia projects, and have a significant understanding of copyright laws. This notable historic building, the Atlas Building, on the National Register of Historic Places, is one of the most significant in the history of the city. It is never -not- covered in advertisements in the present day, so you are saying it is impossible to photograph this side of the historic building simply because there are ads on it? There is only one old and extremely poor image of the back without massive ads, somewhat overexposed, out of focus, and blurry, from before the building was renovated and changed ownership. It does not represent what the building looks like today. ɱ (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

I understand you. As an option, what do you think of just blurring out all that advertisements? I can try to help if you agree rubin16 (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

I think it's worth a try! Perhaps something light to not look that obtrusive? ɱ (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

@Ɱ what do you think of this one? Link - File:Atlas Building.jpg. I have hidden your version at the moment but kept the fact of the revision itself rubin16 (talk) 16:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! I suppose that will work. It's a little bit of historical revisionism, but minor enough that perhaps just a note in the description will do fine. ɱ (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Mickey Mouse

Hi Rubin, Hope all's well with you and yours, Just a heads up incase you didn't spot it but should the the first image at File:KICMEY MOUSE (130794873).jpg be revdelled too as it had a mickey mouse face on the shorts too which I blanked out the second time round,
No one at the DR noticed it but I assume given it was a problem on the shirt it would also be a problem on the shorts lol, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 18:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

@Davey2010 hello and thank you! I haven't noticed it, you are right. Deleted now rubin16 (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

No worries, Haha no worries - I didn't spot it until I uploaded the blanked out version and thought may as well blank that one out too lol, Many thanks for your help it's much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

Hi, as your analysis as stated in the DR shows that the source quoted for the map is not the source for the map, I have marked the image as a derived work with no source. Logically it either has one problem or the other and COM:PRP must apply. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 18:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

hello. The source can be used differently: for example, I see a table with some numbers. I can use these numbers for some conclusions as a source or I can check my results with them (so, I am using facts from the table as a source). I can copy the table and add something else - it is using the table itself as a source. That's what I meant there: it seems that the map was used to check facts, not to copy the lines and borders. rubin16 (talk) 19:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Sure, but I believe that unless someone can point to a source for the map itself, COM:PRP applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

You can follow Commons:Deletion_requests#Appealing_decisions but adding speedy delete to an old file isn’t good anyway, especially when DR was just closed, so, I reverted it rubin16 (talk) 21:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

I have appealed this decision here. You have failed to justify the closure by providing a source for the map. I have applied an alternative template, please add the source or reverse your closure as incorrect.

Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Anyway, the procedure is described there. I deeply respect you for all your contributions and uploaded batches of files but I feel that you disrespect me. It is quite late at night, I gave you the first response and went away from my notebook. Communicating via mobile isn’t as easy, so, I wanted to continue tomorrow. But you ignored the procedure, placed the speedy template without giving me at least a day to answer. I converted it myself to DR, so, let’s others decide. Please, don’t revert as it is incorrect. rubin16 (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

If you want to remove the unsourced notice (which is not by itself a speedy deletion) then go ahead. As per the page you linked to, which oddly is not marked as a policy page, I shall raise a second DR, which is all it advises. The additional evidence will be this discussion, where no source has been verified for the map, which is needed to continue hosting it. If we go down that route, rather than the more normal situation we follow for obvious derived works that lack any source, I suggest you let a different sysop decide how to close it.

Your assertion or "feeling" that I "disrespect" you is factually incorrect. I have no personal viewpoint, this is not my upload, nor is this file of special value or negative value to me, it just came up as part of tracking a sockpuppet farm. Your assertion confuses my response here based on logic and evidence with challenging you personally. Please make a presumption of good faith and a more literal interpretation of policy with regard to evidence and verification. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Sure, the second DR is to be closed by another sysop, I was never going to review it myself again, because I think it is incorrect to do so. And feelings are different from facts, that’s why I decided to share, not directly blame for anything. Good luck :) rubin16 (talk) 22:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

File:The development of the German linguistic area.gif

Hello, I'm the creator of this file. This bloody file has serious shortcomings that I cannot easily fix. So please delete this file. The file can be recreated if the correct sources are specified. Thanks. -- MicBy67 (talk) 21:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi. As I see, the file was created by User:Postmann Michael and then updated by User:Wester. The first one was indef blocked in de.wiki, the second isn’t active since 2020. How are you related to that? rubin16 (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

ESC 2022 Map

The head of the electoral commission, Mikhail Malyshev, announced a preliminary result that 95.5 percent of the votes cast were in favor of the reunification of Crimea with Russia with the rights of a subject of the Russian Federation. For a restoration of the validity of the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Crimea and for Crimea's status as part of Ukraine, 3.5 percent voted and 1.0 percent were invalid ballot papers. The turnout was around 82 percent. Kematen (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

I think it's right. I'm from Austria. And when people vote where they want to belong, then it makes sense that the "winning country" is right. This is also shown in Google Maps. So please put my card back in. Kematen (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

I have just protected a file as edit warring is bad anyway. I asked other administrators to join as I would be considered biased due to my Russian origin rubin16 (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm so sorry. I finally downloaded Inkscape and wanted to color Belarus yellow because they won't be attending in 2022 and saw that the Crimean island is Ukrainian. I googled and researched. I read that there was a bastard mood and that 95.5% voted for Russlnad. And the Crimeans now live as Russians. Then I changed that and am cursed as a pest and an asshole. That annoys me. It's even shown on Google Maps. I don't understand why Crimea isn't Russian??!! Kematen (talk) 19:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

(I'm Austrian) Kematen (talk) 19:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

I only published the truth. Kematen (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Mosquera by Wang Guofeng.jpg

Hi, the author has agreed to release the rights via email template and will do so shortly. Is that enough to request for undeletion or should I also submit an undeletion request? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamvzt (talk • contribs) 18:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

After the release statement sent to COM:OTRS and processed, either OTRS volunteers themselves will restore it or you can write me and I will rubin16 (talk) 04:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, the photographer sent the release statement a few days back. Could you please restore it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamvzt (talk • contribs) 01:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

rename 78484

Rubin! I see they edited your user page. They have requested renaming at m:Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/78484. Looks like Arabic to Hebrew. Google translate did not help me. Can you make sense of it? Best. 70.126.70.40 12:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

How inconvenient. I thought the system logged us in globally. DFO.70.126.70.40 12:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Movie footage

hi! three parts of File:2020年7月26日 首部抗疫题材电影《最美逆行》武汉首映 钟南山题写片名.webm, 22-33s, 65-70s, 100s-end, are movie footage that belong to the movie production companies but not china news service.--RZuo (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

hello, thanks for clarification. I was good with the China News itself but here the portion of non-free video is too high, deleted rubin16 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

File:CBSS logo.png

Hi Rubin16. Would you mind taking a look at File:CBSS logo.png? My guess is that it's the same logo that you deleted back in February as File:CBSS logo.jpg. No source of EXIF data are provided for the file and it seems highly unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder; so, I don't see how a {{CC-zero}} license can be justified. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

@Marchjuly hello. Deleted and warned the user, thank you rubin16 (talk) 14:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look. For what it's worth, I think the logo might be something that's OK as "PD-logo" per c:COM:TOO United States, but I'm not sure about the TOO in the country of origin which is probably Sweden which it would also need to meet for the logo to be OK as "PD-logo". -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

One file is left unprocessed.

Hello, rubin16. Thank you for your works as admin. In Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of Boba Fett, one file File:Troopers on break? (14049800429).jpg is left unprocessed. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Yuraily Lic. Thanks for a message, for some reason “mass process” tool left this one unprocessed, fixed now rubin16 (talk) 18:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, rubin16. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted file

File:Guangzhou Metro icon.svg was used in over 300 pages on enwiki. Would it be possible to find a replacement? Sumanuil (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Porquê eu retirei?

Eu retirei o aviso de exclusão pois eu tinha esquecido de adicionar as licenças, como eu já adicionei, eu apago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ECCraftGames (talk • contribs) 14:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• it is better to allow other administrators to check whether your changes are enough to keep the image and remove the deletion notice than do it yourself rubin16 (talk) 08:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Sibur logo.png

File:Sibur logo.png has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed. Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : AntiCompositeNumber.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Удалить файл File:МК Visual 2 (cropped).jpg

Добрый день! Не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, удалить данный файл. Во время обрезки с помощью CropTool компьютер подтупил и случайно я выгрузил как новую версию. Заранее спасибо! — Calvinn1 (talk) 06:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Почта

Здравствуйте! Будьте любезны — прочтите, пожалуйста, почту. — Calvinn1 (talk) 16:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

My patrol rights request

@Rubin16: Request to please see my request on my perspective. Please don't give your conclusion right now and archive it. Request to think about it again. Checkout my request again. --Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 10:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Contributers2020 no need to ping me when you post on a talk page, I receive the notification anyway. I think you are pursuing a wrong goal of getting some flags, just continue contributing and other users will be able to learn about you and would be less hesitant to give more advanced rights rubin16 (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I think you're right. If the edits is a problem, I am going to try do 575 edits in 1 month. See you next again in 1 month. --Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 14:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

You have missed my point… rubin16 (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Umm... If that's not the point, please explain it. I would love to here it. --Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 17:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I asked not to aim for flags here in a talk page and said that >500 edits are required for autopatrol, not a patrol flag. And you say that you will apply again in a month with 575 edits… I want to warn in advance that hitting 501st edit doesn’t make anyone automatically eligible for a autopatrol flag, and doing some more edits doesn’t qualify for other flags. That’s not how it works. rubin16 (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

I know that point very well. At last, these things matter on how much knowledge you have and what positive impact you have brought to Commons. I will try to be more knowledgeable as my volunteering goes with commons. Still, I was saying on my previous comment that I will retry again at 575 edits. --Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 04:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)!

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thokar 1939.jpg

Greetings,

I was wondering if while closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thokar 1939.jpg you also assessed URAA copyright status. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus you are right, thanks for writing me. Though it is PD in India, it wasn't in PD before 1996, so not PD in US rubin16 (talk) 11:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Потёмкин

FYI Потёмкин, скорей всего, в ОД (в России), только не по тем причинам, которые описывает TarzanASG. Черновик соот. таблицы перехода я готовлю (работа не даёт довести дело до ума). Если кратко - тут дело не в АП юр.лиц, а в том что по всей видимости АП на очень старые советские фильмы (задолго до ГК РСФСР) начинало истекать с момента обнародования. БК и ТРИПС (и по идее россиийский ЗоАПиСП и затем ГК РФ) не возражают против такого (именно для фильмов) - они требуют 50-летней ретроактивной охраны, но не переносят срок начала отсчёта истечения прав. Alex Spade (talk) 09:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Привет. Спасибо за инфо! rubin16 (talk) 09:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/NoFacebook templates

Hi Rubin16; in this deletion request, a whole list of templates was nominated for deletion; your decision was "deleted", but you actually only deleted one, the first template in the list. Probably this wasn't the intention? The other templates still have the DR pending. Personally, I would have preferred a different approach (as detailed in the discussion), but I can see your reasoning; however, I think, it then applies to all templates in the list? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have posted a request to unlink templates to COM:BR: I have manually unlinked and deleted the first one but some others have too many inclusions to do it without a bot flag. When they are unlinked, I will delete them; don’t want to have files with nonexistent templates in descriptions, so, the deletion is still pending rubin16 (talk) 04:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Actually, I have finished practically all of them anyway. rubin16 (talk) 07:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the information. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

LR close

Hi Rubin, I very much disagree with your closure at the LR request, To a certain extent I can agree it may seem petty to oppose someone who's not been on a for 2-3 days however you wouldn't apply at RFA and then disappear for 3 days would you ?,
They've only made 3 edits today and none of those have been licence reviewing ..... I dunno I just feel like you've given the tool willy-nilly to a not-very-active person but then as I said maybe I was being OTT with my oppose –Davey2010^Talk 15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

There is no activity requirement for LR compared to an admin (though even an admin requirement is much lower than applying rights every day). It is somehow similar to patrol rights: if the user knows local policies and is experienced enough, he/she can get the right and patrol even one file a year. If 100 users will review per file each, it is still better than not having them at all rubin16 (talk) 19:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Fair point. I guess activity is out of LRs remit and maybe I'm expecting too much, Indeed anyone can become a LR and then just patrol one file a year I never gave that a thought, It's a good job you're the admin and not me! :-), Thanks for replying, Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 20:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Nah.

I have been a user here in good standing for 17 years. I am not about to be "calm and collegial" to someone who tells me that I have "done absolutely nothing" and that I'm "useless". Also weird how you didn't give them the same tut tut civility above all else spiel. I guess it's only uncivil when we use bad words? --Golbez (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey. I wasn’t looking the whole conversation, I just removed “f*** yourself” part. Though I understand your emotions and disputes are okay in general, I think such types of expressions aren’t suitable for the project we try to create here. rubin16 (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Exactly, which is why I said grow up. "Fuck off" is only worse than "cry me a river" because we have this notion that children can say one but not the other. Big deal. I see you hid my summary but left his. Whatever .--Golbez (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Not everyone here is a native speaker… I don’t know what “cry me a river” means, I just know Timberlake’s song. That’s why I have hidden what is obvious and not touched anything else rubin16 (talk) 03:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

My beef is with people who try to hold on to their admin bit whilst doing nothing at all to help here. You made 6 logged/admin edits this year purely to keep your tools .... that for me is wrong.

Your deletion logs have all been revision-deleting (and odd page deletions here and there but from 2016-2021 other than the 6 deleted pages mentioned nothing substantial). The last block you made was in 2009 ..... so from my point of view you've done nothing admin-worthy at all and like I said nothing worthy of keeping your tools and at the end of the day I bet no one else over at the Inactive admins page have either!.

We need admins who help in backlogs (DR, speedy, CSD), file renaming and the other countless backlogs we have here .... We don't need people who like I said do absolutely nothing here.

Sure my comment could've been worded in a nicer way but I never swore you and I wasn't rude to you and I certainly didn't tell you to go fuck yourself.

As I said my main gripe here is with people who hold on to their tools for dear life whilst contributing nothing to this site (and only delete things to show they're "active"). –Davey2010^Talk 16:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Fortunately I don't give a shit what you think. --Golbez (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Also, hah, "I was never rude to you." Fucking children around here, man. --Golbez (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Good luck with your next RFA. Out of respect for Rubin I'll leave you to it here. Sorry Rubin I tried to explain better why I replied the way I did. –Davey2010^Talk 22:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Храм Тхаба-Ерды.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both sides leaning. Perspective correction neccessary. --Steindy 14:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC) * @Steindy thanks. I have fixed a little bit. Can do more but not sure, starts to look less realistic rubin16 15:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)  Support I think it's okay now. Thank you!Good quality. --Steindy 21:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на село Гуниб - 51355764379.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. Top left dust. --Knopik-som 00:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC) * @Knopik-som fixed that, thank you Rubin16 05:49, 20 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance

The nomination was not "deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016", suggesting you did not read even read the nomination, or the the linked discussion. Please fix this. Thanks.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

I have read it. But nominating all files from the certain period is an overkill. We either need more evidence to prove that most of these files are copyvio (not happened here) or some review of the files and selecting bad ones is required. And delegating this review to the community just by nominating every file isn’t a solution either. The uploader is an active contributor with lots of uploads, the uploader says that suspicious files are limited to Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account, I don’t think that your nomination is justified and reasonable in such case. PCP is a concept but with your approach we can nominate all 75M Commons files in one big nomination based on the fact that hundreds are deleted every day and it is likely that others also could be copyvio. You are free to open a thread on village pump though. rubin16 (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

If the account uploaded around 4300 files in 2016, and I nominated just under 2000 from 2016, how is that "all files from the certain period"? The uploader being an "active contributor with lots of uploads" is not relevant, as these uploads are from an abusive individual the account was shared with.--BevinKacon (talk) 12:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello I am still waiting for an explanation of this. How is 50% the same as 100%? Thanks.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

The substance of my answer is more important than the form. Why are you missing the rest of my answer? 60%, 88% or 99% is just a part of it rubin16 (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your statements accuse me of listing all 2016 files without review, which is completely false. Remove all falsehoods, including the ones on this talk page.--BevinKacon (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Please delete File:Old Hyderabadi.jpg

Please delete File:Old Hyderabadi.jpg. That was my picture which I was uploaded on commons as File:M. H..jpg later I deleted that picture from commons but earlier someone edited and uploaded my picture on commons and made me a creepy old man. Please delete it as soon as possible. Sir please delete it. I can't see that picture again and again daily I am coming and seeing that picture if its deleted or not but still no one deleted it please delete it. Hyderabadi (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

@Hyderabadi deleted rubin16 (talk) 09:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much sir! ❤️☺️✌🏻 Hyderabadi (talk) 09:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! В низине Сулакского каньона - 51355216408.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Rubin16

Defamatory statements should have no place here, so I have posted Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Rubin16.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Medieval Croatian tribes in the 10th century.jpg

Приветствую. Можем на русском общаться? Вы подвели итог, решив "сохранить" файл. Проблема в том, что там не просто проблема с "точностью" отрисовки, там прямой фальсификат. Автор - сокпаппет участника с деструктивным поведением, (см. [2]) он этим много занимается. Сейчас файл нигде не используется. Это является поводом для удаления? Еще мысль - можно откатить изображение к версии от 01:13, 16 May 2020, вот она нефальсифицированная, согласуется с источником.--Nicoljaus (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Здравствуйте! Здесь вообще немного другой подход, чем в Википедии: неиспользуемые файлы могут храниться, даже ложные сведения в изображении не являются прямой причиной для удаление. Если посмотрите Commons:Deletion policy, то там таких причин нет: главное, лицензионная чистота изображения. rubin16 (talk) 18:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

• Я читал, но не очень понимаю "особенности правоприменения". Т.е., мне кажется, этот файл подпадает под категорию "Лично созданные работы не имеющие очевидную образовательную важность." Ну и "Файл, используемый только на Викискладе". Впрочем, больше спорить не буду; спасибо за ответ, в любом случае.--Nicoljaus (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Re: copyright barnstar

Thanks! While looking for the Texas v. Pennsylvania nomination a while back, I found some for other PDFs, and left comments on most all of them, where the case didn’t look clear-cut for deletion (and sometimes even then). You’ve got plenty more to go through, though! Luckily, I’ve reached an agreement with the user making the requests so that I can review them before they’re nominated, as a number have been deleted prematurely. If you have any questions about my (ofttimes terse) comments, feel free to ask me a question. I’ll respond as soon as I can. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Review

Hello. Can you review this photo? ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 02:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

hi, done rubin16 (talk) 07:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you ^_^ ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 13:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Advertising accounts

Hi, I was wondering if we should block all such accounts on sight. See COM:AN#Advertising accounts. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I am blocking not all of them: if contributions are old (there were files from 2016, for example), I just delete files. But in most cases one can see SEO-like text in description, links and even the name close to the promoted website: I blocked such accounts. rubin16 (talk) 14:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Логотип

Здравствуйте. У меня есть свой ютуб-канал. Так вот, если я загружу логотип этого канала, будет ли это считаться несвободным изображением? mvttxws / обсуждеño 11:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

кто автор логотипа канала? rubin16 (talk) 12:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

я. mvttxws / обсуждеño 21:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Все работы, которые вы сделали сами, вы можете опубликовать под свободной лицензией и загрузить сюда. Если эти работы публиковались где то ранее, то нужно будет показать, что автор той публикации и вы - одно лицо. rubin16 (talk) 04:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Хочу задать ещё один вопрос: как удалить файлы по моему желанию? Если вы можете это сделать, то вот — File:Flag-map of Mathia.png, File:MVTTXW$ signature.png, File:FlagofMathia.jpg и File:Это кошка Симка.jpg. mvttxws / обсуждеño 23:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done rubin16 (talk) 06:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Requesting for unblocking

This happened three months ago and due to unprofesionalism I copyrighted materials from other side. I have not known then but I understand now that's why I'm sending this message to regret what I did. And promising to never do it again if you allow me to upload photos again. Best regards Proyezu Proyezu (talk) 13:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

The block expired in august, you can upload since that time rubin16 (talk) 15:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

license checks

Any chance you could look at the licenses on the items in this query?

https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=20534398

The issue is that some of them have a PD UD gov license, but are not US gov works..

thanks. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

@ShakespeareFan00 not sure I will be able to look quickly... I had some time during the weekend and looked through some DRs but this week is busy for me rubin16 (talk) 11:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

I had a look myself, and filed DR's for the files in the query I thought were not PD-US-Gov works... Review of the DR's filed much appreciated :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Archives cantonales jurassiennes (ArCJ)

Hello,

Thanks for the warning. I am trying to help the above user understand how to share the proof he has the rights to the images he has uploaded via permissions-fr@wikimedia.org as he does have this proof. I will also let him know not to upload anything until he has actually carried out that formality.
--Flor WMCH (talk) 11:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@Flor WMCH okay, please, call me if you need any help rubin16 (talk) 11:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Dong bei zhi wu jian suo biao (IA dongbeizhiwujian00liuz).pdf

If the images from this PDF were deleted. The PDF itself should also be filed at DR, (which I've done so). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1940) (20526122341).jpg

Thank you for closing the related DR, but I think you missed this file. De728631 (talk) 12:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I forgot to click "keep" for this file, sorry. Though the book itself is non-free due to content, the photo is free according to COM:Canada: photos created before 1949. And they would be free per URAA, too. rubin16 (talk) 12:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Ah, alright. That's good news then. De728631 (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Флаг

Здравствуйте! Прошу присвоить флаг переименовывающего файлы. Загрузил 4000+ файлов, сделал 6000+ правок, уже есть флаг АПАТ, 0 копивио. С правилами ознакомлен. Заранее спасибо. Юрий Д.К. (talk) 14:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done, но лучше в будущем через COM:RFR rubin16 (talk) 11:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

Hi Rubin, Just want to say thank you for your help with the DR, I greatly appreciate you taking the time to delete them, I'll be honest Rubin I took no joy from nominating them either and certainly looking back I wish I had done things differently but we live and we learn, A good chunk of their files were kept so it wasn't all doom and gloom but still no one takes joy from doing work such as this, Thanks again Rubin I greatly appreciate your help my friend, Take care and stay safe, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Davey2010 thanks a lot! rubin16 (talk) 19:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome :), Take care and stay safe, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:محمد كمال المصري.jpg‎

Yeah, that is a fair close. I struggled with this one for a bit because the category of non-creative photograph or film is post-publication not PMA in Egypt. It ultimately seemed like a simple photograph to me. The film-making angle is an interesting one though. It definitely leads one to possibly interpret the photograph as more of a creative work (though to complicate things even further, there is an emphasis on the Arabic word for "scene" in the template documentation). Interesting case. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

I wasn’t able to find the exact name of the film, I just found several more photos that looked like film scenes where the person is even dressed the same way. That’s why I concluded it was a film rubin16 (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Map of the Russian federation Map showing Regions, principal cities, main roads, &c.png

Hi. This file is in use on English Wikipedia. It is sourced to ru:Изображение:Russian federation.png which you deleted. Can you temporarily restore so that we can copy the history correctly? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre will this help? I have a right to delete pages in ru.wp but not restore them or view deleted stuff, this could be a quick decision rubin16 (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

That works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/MasterChef logos

Thanks for deleting most of the logos. As I see, other logos still remain. Then as I figured, I could copy the files and import them to locally enwiki, which I did. However, I didn't copy the MasterChef China logo... or the logo using a font somewhat different from the one seen in this link (see also the one in enwiki). I was unable to upload the logo of MasterChef Chile locally as Spanish Wikipedia only uses files from Commons. Somehow, the font for the wordmark looks different from the one used in enwiki. George Ho (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/MasterChef logos

I saw that you closed the discussion and chose to delete the logos, but still some logos remain. Can this be looked into? Thanks. - SanAnMan (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Seems to be a script error, deleted manually. Thanks rubin16 (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:MasterChef Logo & Wordmark.svg

Now what to do with Commons:Deletion requests/File:MasterChef Logo & Wordmark.svg, created by User:SanAnMan? George Ho (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Just speedy closed rubin16 (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:USAir 427 Crash Site.jpg

I don't know where you get the idea that this image "seems to be taken from a public road". OpenStreetMap clearly shows that it is a private road. Brianjd (talk) 12:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @TheSoondunceMan. Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

thank you @Brianjd. I have checked that the road is connected to the general network of roads but haven't checked the properties on OSM. I tried to research more, for example using Street view on Google maps: there is no street view on the Pettita Lane itself but I see no fence or restrictions when you look to the turn from the Green Garden Road to the Pettita Lane. I am looking more... rubin16 (talk) 14:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

screenshot from the Google Street View rubin16 (talk) 14:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

I see a sign on the corner; I am not sure if that is relevant. I am also not sure whether there is a local convention about not accessing roads like this without permission. What I do know is that the lack of Street View coverage is itself evidence that it is a private road. Brianjd (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, the memorial is some distance down the round, beyond multiple bends in the road, far beyond what is visible on Street View. Brianjd (talk) 04:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

I want to do some more investigation, just got sick, sorry. I will return to you this week if get healthy rubin16 (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

@Brianjd deleted, thank you for your comments rubin16 (talk) 15:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg

Hi Rubin16, I didn't see your decision until today. Sorry for the late message. I think your decision is wrong. These persons are clearly recognisable. According to privacy protection standards there is no need to see whole faces or something so that a person is considered as "recognisable" in legal terms. Furthermore at least the most left person's face is almost completely recognisable, similarly the face of the second person from right. In my opinion we have to delete this image as long as we have no consent from the photographed persons. Because these persons are photographed while illegally crossing a border they surely will not grant any approval. By the way, the facts that the camera is not hidden and that the photographer stands close to those people are no replacement for an explicit consent even more not for a consent to publish the image under a free license in the internet which makes the image reusable in a plenty of ways. I politely ask you to delete this image, because we at least are in a legal gray area in this case. For details see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. -- Chaddy (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

hello. COM:PEOPLE in its beginning says "The subject's consent is usually needed for publishing a photograph of an identifiable individual taken in a private place, and Commons expects this even if local laws do not require it. In many countries (especially English-speaking ones) the subject's consent is not usually needed for publishing a straightforward photograph of an identifiable individual taken in a public place." I believe that this is a public place, not a hidden photographer, so, local practice is that we assume that people on the photo do know about it and don't delete such image. rubin16 (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

testing CD

test test rubin16 (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

test rubin16 (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Crash site DR

Can you please expand upon what Commons policy you were following when you reversed your earlier close? Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

I have added comment to the nomination page and nothing prohibits me from changing my own closure of the nomination if some new information is investigated. Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions has the similar procedure: contacting the admin who can reverse the decision rubin16 (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm not concerned about the idea that an admin can reverse a decision. I'm asking about the policy that justifies this deletion at all. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg

Hi Rubin16, I didn't see your decision until today. Sorry for the late message. I think your decision is wrong. These persons are clearly recognisable. According to privacy protection standards there is no need to see whole faces or something so that a person is considered as "recognisable" in legal terms. Furthermore at least the most left person's face is almost completely recognisable, similarly the face of the second person from right. In my opinion we have to delete this image as long as we have no consent from the photographed persons. Because these persons are photographed while illegally crossing a border they surely will not grant any approval. By the way, the facts that the camera is not hidden and that the photographer stands close to those people are no replacement for an explicit consent even more not for a consent to publish the image under a free license in the internet which makes the image reusable in a plenty of ways. I politely ask you to delete this image, because we at least are in a legal gray area in this case. For details see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. -- Chaddy (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

hello. COM:PEOPLE in its beginning says "The subject's consent is usually needed for publishing a photograph of an identifiable individual taken in a private place, and Commons expects this even if local laws do not require it. In many countries (especially English-speaking ones) the subject's consent is not usually needed for publishing a straightforward photograph of an identifiable individual taken in a public place." I believe that this is a public place, not a hidden photographer, so, local practice is that we assume that people on the photo do know about it and don't delete such image. rubin16 (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Maybe you should change your archiving settings, archiving the threads already after 3 days is a bit fast.

It is not that easy: In many countries you need consent for publishing images of living people also if they are taken in public. According to Commons:Country specific consent requirements, this applies also to Hungary. So without consent this picture has to be deleted. Therefore I ask you again to delete this photograph. -- Chaddy (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

I agree with everything that Chaddy said, except for their conclusion that the file must be deleted. Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Hungary says that consent is not required for:

people shown in a larger group (without distinction of one or more individuals)

I think this exception applies here, and I agree with the admin's decision to keep this file. Brianjd (talk) 04:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Brianjd, there are at least two people that are clearly distinguishable. Furthermore this is a group of six people. I wouldn't say this is a "larger" group.

And apart from that all: As I repeatedly said these people can get severe legal problems with this image. We are Wikipedia/Commons, we do not need to carelessly endanger other people. -- Chaddy (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

I agree with this. But what matters is how the consent is given and fixed. There is no practice here that we ask for VRT-like permissions from the people on photo if we can assume that they know about the photograph being taken. And, as I read, the same implied consent works in Hungary, too: while you don’t show signs of objection on the photo, it is assumed that the consent was received. For example, you can read this: Guardian, Xpat. PS: sorry for the archived thread, I have fixed settings rubin16 (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

I already wrote about this earlier: "Because these persons are photographed while illegally crossing a border they surely will not grant any approval. By the way, the facts that the camera is not hidden and that the photographer stands close to those people are no replacement for an explicit consent even more not for a consent to publish the image under a free license in the internet which makes the image reusable in a plenty of ways." - We can not assume any implied consent in this situation. Put yourself in this situation: Would you allow that photographs of you doing something illegal would be published under a free license in the internet? I guess not.

And what should they have done to hinder the photographer shooting these photographs? They are busy getting as fast as possible beneath the fence. Furthermore as in any image we only can see one little moment. We do not know what happened before or after this moment.

In my opionion this case is very clear and I am confused that we have to discuss this so extensively. -- Chaddy (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

I don’t agree with you. You can renominate image for deletion if you like. rubin16 (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done by Chaddy: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg#File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg 2. Brianjd (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Связь с пресс-службой президента Республики Беларусь

Добрый вечер. Мне бы хотелось связаться с пресс-службой белорусского президента по поводу использования материалов их сайта под лицензией Creative Commons с разрешением коммерческого использования. При этом с августа я на форуме Викисклада обсуждал правомерность публикации - здесь не указывается ни запрета, ни разрешения на коммерческое использование материалов, при этом предварительно уведомления пресс-службы не требуется: это касается не только СМИ, в том числе и российских, но и вообще в Интернете. Однако Хомелка и Homoatrox отказались от моей просьбы ввиду событий августа прошлого года и я им объяснял, что обращаться не могу ввиду того, что я живу по российским законам, хотя белорусское законодательство очень близко российскому. И к вам вопрос, как администратору Викисклада - правда ли, что разрешение на использование медиаматериалов у пресс-службы главы иностранного государства не нарушает российские законы? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Добрый вечер. Немного вопрос не понял: Вы имеете в виду, не нарушаете ли Вы какой либо закон, если напишите белорусам с просьбой выпустить материал под свободной лицензией? rubin16 (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Да, имеется ввиду так. Между тем, сами Россия и Белоруссия входят в Союзное государство, а значит, имеется некоторая унификация законодательства. Из-за положения дел на сайте решил обратиться к Вам, так как знакомые мне участники Викисклада из Белоруссии отклонили мою просьбу, а также ещё возможной юридической ответственности за подобные действия с помощью сети Интернет. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

За спрос, по крайней мере в России, пока ничего не берут. С высокой вероятностью могут не согласиться, но преследовать за запрос не будут rubin16 (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Таким образом, никакая юридическая ответственность за консультации по авторскому праву с иностранными органами власти не грозит, если сообщения не содержат сведения, несущие в себе государственную тайну? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Вы же собираетесь просто написано что-то в духе «опубликуйте, пожалуйста, то-то под такой-то лицензией, это позволит сделать то-то» rubin16 (talk) 10:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Да, собираюсь писать письмо с просьбой о переводе материалов на свободную лицензию. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 13:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

map protection

Hi. Could you lessen the restriction on File:World laws pertaining to homosexual relationships and expression.svg? Chile's passed SSM. There are also other bits that may need to be adjusted: the Taliban is the govt of Afgh now, and it appears there is no dealth-penalty law; laws repealed in Sumatra, and perhaps not enforced in Lebanon. Kwamikagami (talk) 08:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

@Kwamikagami  Done rubin16 (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Took the op to clean up Indonesia: there were 3 superposed copies of every single island! Kwamikagami (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

DR closed as keep but tags not removed

Hello. I was looking in Category:Deletion requests December 2020 and came across Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Comparative embryology of the vertebrates (1953). This DR was closed by you as keep. However, some the files in the DR have not had their DR tag removed in the individual pages. Also, Category:Deletion_requests_December_2020 still has contents but Commons:Deletion requests/2020/12 was deleted by you. I was wondering why this was the case. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Sometimes the script fails and I believe this is the reason for the nomination I closed but not all files descriptions updated. I think it is done now, let me check others. In one place I see that the discussion was closed but then reopened (after I have deleted the requests page), in another place I need to check what happened: maybe the nomination wasn’t added to the page of a particular day in December. Thanks for letting know rubin16 (talk) 04:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

@MrLinkinPark333 I have noticed that this discussion was never added to Commons:Deletion requests/2020/12/13, that's the reason. rubin16 (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

I believe it is fixed now except from the set of images that was not-deleted by one of the sysops because it would become free in 2022, so, just waiting for a couple of weeks rubin16 (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

@Rubin16: Thank you for looking into these nominations and figuring out what happened :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Меломан.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Меломан.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mitte27.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Rubin16
	Hi Rubin16, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

Thank you, @Davey2010. Merry Christmas! rubin16 (talk) 06:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Снятие защиты с {{PD-Azerbaijan}}

Добрый вечер. Хочу перевести данный шаблон на русский язык и создать мультиязычную версию шаблона. Однако здесь страницу могут редактировать только администраторы. Не могли бы вы снять защиту с шаблона общественного достояния в Азербайджане, чтобы я мог совершить указанные действия? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done: я переделал под {{Autotranslate}} rubin16 (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Перенос File:Dagestan_authorisation-Russian.png в разрешения VRTS

Добрый вечер. В 2014 году пресс-служба Главы Республики Дагестан дала согласие на использование материалов сайта по лицензии CC-BY 3.0. С тех пор прошло семь лет, а автор запроса так и не передал согласие в службу OTRS, как было в 2008 с Kremlin.ru. Можете описать ситуацию? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Добрый вечер. Так разрешение публично и доступно, VRT дополнительной ценности особо не добавит, разве что будет ещё дополнительное подтверждение с какого-то официального емейл адреса. Но, технически, текущий формат согласия ничем не хуже по своей сути (разве что пдф подделана) rubin16 (talk) 16:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

То есть в этом плане разрешение VRT уже не нужно? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

В кейсе условного kremlin.ru это скорее была двойная страховка, но и обычного письма бы хватило (на мой взгляд) rubin16 (talk) 17:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Кстати, что скажете по поводу моего прошлого сообщения на вашей странице обсуждения (о снятии защиты с {{PD-Azerbaijan}})? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

о лицензии и флагах

Здравствуйте. Уже явно больше 7 дней прошло, но файлы раз и два никто не трогает. Они считаются допустимы? Вопрос в связи с получением участником флага ПАТ в рувики.--Jaguar K (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Нет, конкретно эти два точно должны быть (на мой взгляд) удалены. 7 дней - это как и просроченное КУ в ру.Вики, просто ещё не добрались: Category:Media without a license, там 3 месяца пока задержка идет rubin16 (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy Christmas and new year holidays

	Merry Christmas and new year, Rubin16
	Hi Rubin16, Have a sweet and a safe Christmas and New Year holidays. Wishing you a colorful Christmas season. , --Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)