Wikimedia Commons

User talk:SuperTank17/Archive

< User talk:SuperTank17
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 88.64.116.153 in topic Category:Vietnamese_T-54A_or_Type_59_tanks
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SuperTank17!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

— Manecke 15:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:ZSU-57-2_knocked_out.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:ZSU-57-2_knocked_out.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko 17:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:T-44-122_round.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:T-44-122_round.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:T-44-122.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:T-44-122.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:T-44-85.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:Image:T-44-85.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


File:T-44-85.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-44-85.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Anatoliy (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:BRDM-2_Poland_1994.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BRDM-2_Poland_1994.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:BRDM-2_Poland_1994.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 14:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:BRDM-2_Poland_1994.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BRDM-2_Poland_1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:BMD-1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BMD-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:BMP-1P.gif edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BMP-1P.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BMP-1P.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:T-72_Iraq_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-72_Iraq_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:ShKH_DANA.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ShKH_DANA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ShKH_DANA.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:ZSU-23-4_Szyłka.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ZSU-23-4_Szyłka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ZSU-23-4_Szyłka.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Rys-med1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rys-med1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rys-med1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Leopard_2A4,_M113,_Bergepanzer_2A2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Leopard_2A4,_M113,_Bergepanzer_2A2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Polish_M113.JPG edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Polish_M113.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Polish_MT-LB.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Polish_MT-LB.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Polish_MT-LB.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE... edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

... do not upload any new images from http://www.mon.gov.pl, before you have proven that files from that site are free! Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 18:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I dlatego od dawna odpuściłem sobie załatwianie jakichkolwiek zgód na użyczenie grafik. Nie mam pojęcia co miałbym wysłać na OTRS, bo przecież nie maila skasowanego parę lat temu. Na twoim miejscu by sobie odpuścił. To walka z wiatrakami, spora część adminów Commons zajmuje się tylko kasowaniem czego popadnie pod byle pozorem. Ja nie zamierzam marnować czasu, jak chcesz możesz spróbować pogadać z którymś z polskich adminów Commons. Nemo5576 (talk) 14:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Spróbuj rzecznika prasowego. Wyślij kopie maila z 2005 i poproś o potwierdzenie zgody. Nemo5576 (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Przepraszam, że tak późno - j.w. Radomil talk 22:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
[1] tu masz link do wzoru takiego zapytania. Załącz do niego oryginalnego maila z 2005 i czekaj na odpowiedź. Nemo5576 (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
[2] masz maila (nie wiem czy aktualnego) do Centrum Informacyjnego MON, oni udzielili zgody , do nich pisz. Zmień "grafika", na "grafiki" i podaj z dwa przykłady i po problemie. Wybór które należy do Ciebie :) Nemo5576 (talk) 06:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
"Zgadzam się na udostępnienie na licencji (np. PD / CC-BY / GFDL+CC-BY-SA-ALL - wybrać właściwą; opis poniżej ) grafik ze strony:www.". Nemo5576 (talk) 12:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, SuperTank17!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:BWR-1K.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BWR-1K.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Polish_M113.JPG edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Polish_M113.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Leopard_2A4,_M113,_Bergepanzer_2A2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Leopard_2A4,_M113,_Bergepanzer_2A2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:T-72.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-72.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Polish_WZT-2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Polish_WZT-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:BMP-1KShM.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BMP-1KShM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:BWP-1_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BWP-1_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:BWP-1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BWP-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:T-34M.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-34M.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.5 07:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deprecated License edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

It has been found that Image:T-62M Kabul.JPG has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 22:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:PRP-4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:PRP-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 12:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your Flickr uploads edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello SuperTank17!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! One hint ahead: You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!
Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:T-55_next_to_an_OSCE_vehicle_in_Kosovo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-55_next_to_an_OSCE_vehicle_in_Kosovo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:T-55_next_to_an_OSCE_vehicle_in_Kosovo.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:T-55_in_Bosnia,_Operation_Bøllebank.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-55_in_Bosnia,_Operation_Bøllebank.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.106.114 10:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Estonian_BTR-80s.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Estonian_BTR-80s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.97.237 19:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello SuperTank17!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer images from Wikipedia to Commons, please use this tool. This tool retains all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.

Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 17:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I managed to use this tool with this file that you uploaded: File:BMP-1 or BMP-2, South Ossetia War.jpg. Note the correct licence tags. --High Contrast (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Disabled_Iraqi_T-62_Battle_of_Khafji.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Disabled_Iraqi_T-62_Battle_of_Khafji.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Disabled_Iraqi_T-62_Battle_of_Khafji.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Destroyed_T-55_during_Operation_Desert_Storm.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Destroyed_T-55_during_Operation_Desert_Storm.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problem tags edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

With such actions: [3] and [4], the problem is not solved. Please read COM:L for more information. --High Contrast (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Czarny czwartek edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witam!

Dziękuję za opis pojazdów. Wkrótce, dodam więcej zdjęć tego wydarzenia. Niektóre zawierają te zabawki. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Name of Category:100 56 TK on Kuivasaari island, Finland edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

SuperTank, you created the Category:100 56 TK on Kuivasaari island, Finland as part of your effort to organize T-55 images. I believe, however, that the name of this particular category is overly specific. I suggest creating a new Category:100 56 TK instead. See Category talk:100 56 TK on Kuivasaari island, Finland.MKFI (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I left a reply for your comment on my talk page. MKFI (talk) 19:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Type 62 edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 

Hello

And thanks to have put a better category on my picture.

When I uploaded it, I discovered that the laotian panel was somewhat wrong : it says : "T 58 tank"... T 58 ? Since it says the tank is chinese made, I tried Type 58 instead... same problem. Pff... But it looked like a Type 59, hence the category I did choose. How did you recognize it's a Type 62 ? (they look very much alike)

Chaoborus (talk) 01:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your interesting explanations. Chaoborus (talk) 19:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Prague_Spring_picture_in_Praha.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Prague_Spring_picture_in_Praha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello SuperTank17!
As a frequent contributor such as yourself, I think autopatrol-rights would be an adequate additional function. More information can be found here. If you are interested, please ask for the autopatrol right at Commons:Requests for rights. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

(not) M60 tank? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is this correct? File talk:M60 Patton img 2336.jpg -- Common Good (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blanking edit

Hi SuperTank17,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Iraqi T-54/T-54A tanks on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy|reason here}} and add it on top of the page; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 13:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk

interesting edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Interesting information: where have you read this? I was always wondering what the second letter is meaning. --High Contrast (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

To answer your question: Here is an official guide to how a VIRIN ID is created.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 20:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

T-55 tanks edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello!

I have tried to arrange the Chaos in the Category:T-55 tanks. I have sorted some existing categories in newly created meta cats like Category:T-55 by type and Category:T-55 by country of service. Some problems remain: unification of category names and what we do with those museum related T-55 categories. Do you have any good ideas here? --High Contrast (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

What do you think genrally of museum categories like "Vehicle XY in the XY museum, country"? --High Contrast (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Type 69-II Iraq 2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Can you add the first-hand source of this image? Obviously you have found it on any us military site. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:T-54A_or_Type_59_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-54A_or_Type_59_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.107.90 22:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:T-55_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-55_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.107.90 22:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:T-54A_or_Type_59_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_5.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-54A_or_Type_59_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.107.90 22:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:T-55_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-55_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.107.90 22:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:T-55_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:T-55_tank_in_the_Military_Vehicle_Technology_Foundation_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.107.90 22:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Yugoslav_T-55.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Yugoslav_T-55.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Yugoslav_T-55.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 19:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Still no valid source.--Avron (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Truck in Iraq.JPEG edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Can you identify the URAL truck that is shown on this photograph? As you can see, this is a tow-axle truck. The Ural-4320 has three axles. --High Contrast (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rotation edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Please rotate these two images [5] [6] correctly. It is unprofessional leaving them with this condition in the Commons. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 14:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please consider reading these two pages: Commons:Naming categories and Commons:Categories.

Please embed new "by country categories" properly.

Creating such extremely specialized categories like this one is not very productive. The "Category:Ural-4320" should contain something like "Ural-4320 by country".

What is your opinion on this?

Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:UAZ_Hunter_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:UAZ_Hunter_2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:UAZ_Hunter_3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:UAZ_Hunter_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Kamaz_5410_advert.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Kamaz_5410_advert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


Category:AC 3,0-40 edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

АЦ 3,0-40 означает что автоцистерна имеет три тонны воды и расход насоса 40 л/с. Платформы при этом могут быть разные. Поэтому относить эту категорию к автомобилям ЗиЛ неправильно.

Вы создали Category:AG AC-2.5-40. Что буквы AG означают?--Georg Pik (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:GAZ-3307_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:GAZ-3307_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Zil fire engines edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

I have noticed that you started recently a new category tree with Zil fire engines. That's a good idea because lots images exist on Commons with this topic. What about these four categories ([7], [8], [9], [10]). What is the purpose of these categories? Can you write a little description into them? Can these cats somehow be connected with the category "ZiL fire engines"? --High Contrast (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

At first I too thought that these fire engines were made by ZiL but Georg Pik told me that these designations have nothing to do with the manufacturer and that they refer to the parameters of the water pumps these fire engines have installed. As you can see on this picture File:Matchboxes USSR 1918-1988 10.jpg there are also AC-40 fire engines based on Ural-375D trucks.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I managed it edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello!

I don't know why you have removed my question without answering it, but I managed to fix the file I mentioned. I have deleted the old version. --High Contrast (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have deleted the "old" version. --High Contrast (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your thoughts in a DR edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

I have recognized your thoughts in the deletion debate of an image that was uploaded by you from a so called "bad flickr source". Well, EXIF data and image resolution, dubious collections of lots of different photographs are in fact signs for copyright violation or file washing, for instance on flickr. There is a consensus about this on Commons that you can read here: Commons:How to detect copyright violations. Have in making good contributions for Commons. --High Contrast (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you create... edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

...categories like these again, please learn from this. Thanks in advance and happy editing. --High Contrast (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Star A25P.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

W Kielcach - ale samochód należy do którejś z okolicznych OSP. Trzeba by ustalić po numerze, ale nie wiem gdzie... Pibwl (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:T-72_Main_Battle_tanks_Poland.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-72_Main_Battle_tanks_Poland.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:T-72_Main_Battle_tanks_Poland.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The source is insuffiecient for "PD-Polish". You must provide where and when the image was first published. The stated source does not help anybody. --High Contrast (talk) 12:17, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Iraqi soldiers provide security at a checkpoint around an office building in downtown Baghdad, Iraq.JPG edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:18, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


File:BMP-3.png edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:BMP-3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:IWT_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:IWT_2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:IWT_2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 08:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The source is insuffiecient for "PD-Polish". You must provide where and when the image was first published. The stated source does not help anybody. Please provide a valid source in order to keep the image. --High Contrast (talk) 08:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

IFA fire engines edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for splitting up the . That saved me some time, because it was on my to-do list (at least for the W50). --32X (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image:2006-06 Kunowice 19.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Thats a Polish tank? Rather a russian one (or better one of the soviet union) ...Sicherlich Post 18:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

see the plate in front of the tank. Its obviously russian and its for the fallen russian soldiers in 1945 ...Sicherlich Post 18:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
so an It's not far fetched - with other words a simple guess - is how you decide what is a fact? ... it as well not far fetched that thex took an old russian tank to "create" this memorial (by the way; its not a cemetry). ... watching how this is made its IMO as well not far fetched that it was made soon after the war. At this time Poland did not have tanks and for sure none to give away ..Sicherlich Post 18:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
if I compare the pics with this one I can not see a differences. Both T34/85; yes but a differnce at the turret casting; I can not see ...Sicherlich Post 03:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Destroyed turret of a T-62 in Tajikistan.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

You have iddentified this tank turret as a T-62 tank turret but I think this is not correct. I tend to say it is a T-72 turret. What do you think? --High Contrast (talk) 07:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes I thought that might be possible therefore I put this picture in the Category:Unidentified tanks. Some time later, User talk:Marcus Qwertyus put it back in the Category:T-62 tanks. As you can see on his talk page we talked about this and came to a conclusion that it be either T-62 or a T-72. That's why I just put it back in the Category:Unidentified tanks.
This is one of those case where despite how many times I look at the picture I can't seem to make a 100% positive identification.
Regards . - SuperTank17 (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hägglunds Combat Vehicle 9030FIN is the designation for the Finish Hägglunds Combat Vehicle 9030 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Attention please!

Yes, that's right, but we must find a solution where the variant and country of service is not linked in one category due to wikimedia category naming consistency. Look here as it was made in the example category: Category:Stridsvagn 122. --High Contrast (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have just made some changes to the categories~, I think it serves as a good compromise.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 18:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's okay for the FIN-variant-category. But please correct this for the categories Category:Hägglunds Combat Vehicle 9030N and Category:Hägglunds Combat Vehicle 9030CH as well. --High Contrast (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
The category tree is now perfect. I hope that you are willing to work like this in the future, too. Best Regards, High Contrast (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

By country of service edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

If you create new sub-categories of vehicles by country, proceed like [this]: Main category: Category:VEHICLE_XY by country of service and the apparent sub-categories: Category:VEHICLE_XY in countryname(Demonym) service. Thanks. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Romanian_Gepard_SPAAGs.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Romanian_Gepard_SPAAGs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

"OT-810 APCs painted or visually modified to resemble Sonderkraftfahrzeug 251 APCs" edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Again category problem. Most of the categories you have created are definately useful, but in some cases they absolutely inappropriate names, like in this case: Category:OT-810 APCs painted or visually modified to resemble Sonderkraftfahrzeug 251 APCs. This name is too long and written like this not within the project scope.

In the future, please choose shorter and more concisely names and write a small description in any language if you want to specifiy or explain for which a category is intended for. The category "OT-810 APCs painted or visually modified to resemble Sonderkraftfahrzeug 251 APCs" will be moved. I have inserted a description that is basically your category name. Proceed like this in the future.

For further questions ask me, or consult COM:PUMP.

Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 20:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Wzór 29 Ursus armored car towing a wzór 36 anti-tank gun during the VII Aircraft Picnic in Kraków.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Panzerkampfwagen II during the VII Aircraft Picnic in Kraków 3.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Vehicle identification edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Can you identify these two vehicles, that are shown on these photographs (both GAZ vehicles): [11] , [12]. --High Contrast (talk) 19:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The first one is a ZiL fire engine (at least the truck on which it is based). The second one seems to indeed be a GAZ vehicle as evidenced by the symbol on the front. I will tell you if I find out anything else (as this requires some additional research).
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Any news about this? --High Contrast (talk) 13:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately no. I did some digging but I wasn't able to find any information on this vehicle. Maybe you should ask some Russia-based contributors like User:Georg Pik since they might have access to better sources about the subject.
BTW I see that you didn't upload the rest of the pictures from [13] even though they are all available under free licenses. Why is that? Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I was running out of time. So I focussed on uploading the interesting stuff. --High Contrast (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
So, a picture of a BRDM-1 is not interesting? ;) From what I noticed there are very few pictures of BRDM-1s on Wikimedia Commons (Something I am planning to change in the future but for now I have other stuff to upload). Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Only few BRDM-1 images? There are about 50. Anyway, these files are fine contributions to Commons. --High Contrast (talk) 18:53, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
50? I am looking at Category:BRDM-1 and at this moment there are 3 pictures in the main category, 5 in Category:BRDM-1 armored scout cars in Polish service and 2 in Category:BRDM-1 at the Polish Army Museum in Warsaw, Poland which gives us 10 pictures. If you want to count pictures of BRDM-1-based tank destroyers then that gives us a total of 17 pictures. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I was wanting to write 15. 50 is impossible. But 15 is quite sufficient in comparison with this unique vehicle that nobody can identify. --High Contrast (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
You don't have to rub it in. It's just so happens that Russian armored police vehicles are not my speciality but I'm sure there's someone on Commons or Wikipedia who would be able to find out what it is.
About pictures: I'm sure one day the number in that category will reach 50. I have some pictures of the BRDM-1 in Muzeum Wojsko Polskiego in Warsaw from a year ago and I'm actually going there this year as well hoping to make some better pictures as well as pictures from other angles than last time.

More carefulness in creating new categories edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Example: you have created this category: "Category:Armored fighting vehicles of the Afghan National Army" that was sorted in "Armored fighting vehicles by country". This is simply wrong because "Afghan National Army" is no country. That's we de not sort military vehicles by country and not by a periodically names Army - only in rare case this is useful. Please help repairing these false categories. --High Contrast (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Form what I understand the reason why there's a separate Category:Military equipment of the Afghan National Army (which is a parent category to Category:Armored fighting vehicles of the Afghan National Army) is because Afghanistan had quite a few military organizations operating in it that all stated that they were the official armed forces of the country. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 22:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, "Category:Armored fighting vehicles of the Afghan National Army" (created by you) is incorrectly categorized because the "Afghan National Army" is no country and consequently it cannot be placed in a "by country"-category. --High Contrast (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Fire Scania ppoz1a.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Zdjęcie z Opola (woj.opolskie)Aung (talk) 19:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:CA-95_SAM_systems_on_a_military_parade.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:CA-95_SAM_systems_on_a_military_parade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

file:F-16 Poland.png edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witaj!

Na ogonie jest szachownica! Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Daewoo Lublin 3-based fire engine on Mickiewicza and Piłsudskiego intersection in Kraków.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:APC-70.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:APC-70.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Multichill (talk) 22:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:Twój Polonez edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Witam ! Spojler na tylnej klapie jak i plastikowy chwyt powietrza na masce były dostępne już wcześniej w bogatszych wersjach wyposażeniowych. Egzemplarz w moim posiadaniu został wyprodukowany w styczniu 1982 r. co wskazuje na to że jest to model MR'78. Moim zdaniem Polonez ze zdjęcia File:First generation Polonez.jpg to może być MR'78, o czym świadczą metalowe kołpaki, słabo widać ale i brak lusterka od strony pasażera. Radzę poczytać trochę literatury o samochodzie Polonez, bo spojler nie świadczy o tym czy jest to MR'78 czy MR'83.

Zauważyłem że zdarza Ci się popełniać sporo błędów, np. tu - dodam że wersja MR'85 charakteryzuje się przednią częścią nadwozia przejętą z wersji Coupé - czy tu - to wersja LB charakteryzująca się dłuższą częścią towarową od wersji ST. Jeszcze jedno, nie rozumiem dlaczego uszczegóławiasz kategorie ? bo wątpie żeby ktoś kto mało zna się na samochodach stwierdził czy jest to Daewoo-FSO Polonez Caro Plus 1.4 GTI 16V multipoint injection czy FSO Polonez MR'78 lub MR'83, co bardzo ciężko rozróżnić przy samochodzie, który został odpowiednio "przerobiony" przez właściciela. --FSO talk 11:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nie dodałem ? jest w opisie jasno napisane "FSO Polonez MR'78 z 1982 r....". Lusterka po obu stronach owszem są, ale tylko to od strony kierowcy jest oryginalne, lusterko od strony pasażera jest po prostu "samoróbką". Nie chodzi mi też o kombinowanie właścicieli przy swoich pojazdach, chodziło mi o to że np. jak Polonez MR'78 jest po kolizji to czasami z braku części oryginalnych zakłada się części z MR'83, a znam przypadki że zakładano części z Caro. Pozdrawiam --FSO talk 13:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Elbląg in 1990.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Always remember to categorize the main subject of the image, not 20-pixel-objects. Thanks in advance for respecting Commons-rules. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Now, a field artillery gun edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello

I call you again after your great explanations about my picture of a Type 62 tank. Now it's about 2 categories I found :

My question is : what's the difference (if there is actually one : the english article is en:122 mm howitzer M1938 (M-30)...) ?

Best regards Chaoborus (talk) 22:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello.

Sorry for a rather late reply. Anyway from what I know M1938 and M-30 are both one and the same field gun.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. That's I've just concluded.   Chaoborus (talk) 23:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Warszawy edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Witam! dlaczego niewłaściwie przypisujesz zdjęcia Warszaw, do kategorii które dotyczą innych wersji tego auta?

Te dwie fotografie przedstawiają model 203/204 lub 223/224 produkowany w latach 1964-1973, a nie M20.

Te zdjęcia przedstawiają Warszawy M20 w wersji z lata 1951-1957, której sylwetka była identyczna jak GAZa-M20 Pobieda z lat 1946-1955. Mam nadzieję, że wytłumaczysz mi fakt swojego moim zdaniem błędnego postępowania. Pat731 (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jak już wcześniej napisałem pierwsze wersje Warszawy M20, produkowane od 6 listopada 1951 roku do 15 maja 1957 roku, miał wygląd zewnętrzny identyczny jak GAZ-M20 Pobieda w wersji produkowanej w latach 1946-1955. Jedyna różnica pomiędzy tymi autami to kołpaki oraz boczne emblematy na pokrywie silnika z napisem "Warszawa". Pojazdy na zdjęciu dysponują tymi elementami.
Jako dowód polecam to zdjęcie http://www.fso_warszawa.republika.pl/Grafika/Historia/historia1.jpg, ukazuje ono pierwszą Warszawę M20, zjeżdżająca z taśmy montażowej FSO. Sylwetka Warszawy uległa zmianie dopiero w 1957 roku, wraz z przeprowadzeniem modernizacji i wprowadzeniem modelu M20-57 późnij noszącej oznaczenie 200. Dodatkowo polecem Ci zapoznanie się z książkami Polskie konstrukcje motoryzacyjne 1947-1960, Album samochodów FSO oraz Historia konstrukcji samochodów FSO. Są w nich dokładnie ukazane wszystkie wersje Warszawy.
Odnośnie atrap chłodnicy, File:FSO warszawa.JPG zaprezentowana na tym zdjęciu została wprowadzona do produkcji w 1964 wraz z modelami 203 i 204. Faktycznie przyznaję Ci rację co do małej szyby, atrapa w tym egzemplarzy musiała zostać zmieniona z chromowanej występującej w modelach 200, 201 i 202, na tą z 203 i 204 oraz późniejszych 223 i 224.
File:FSO Warszawa M20 in Kraków.jpg w przypadku tego zdjęcia wyraźnie widać, że jest to odmiana sedan 203/204/223/224. Chociażby po "dużej tylnej szybie oraz stylistyce przodu pojazdu.

Pozdrawiam Pat731 (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:ARO_Muscel_M-461_advert.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:ARO_Muscel_M-461_advert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Picture_of_a_North_Vietnamese_T-54A_or_Type_59,_in_a_museum.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Picture_of_a_North_Vietnamese_T-54A_or_Type_59,_in_a_museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Avron (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:KrAZ-214 dump truck next to a crane of the 7th October Works, Magdeburg.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Kannst du das Bild mit den korrigierten Daten nochmal hochladen? Es handelt sich nicht um einen Kraz 214, sondern um den Kraz 255. Sandmann4u (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've moved the image. --32X (talk) 08:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Polski Fiat 125p (1969 - 1972) edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Witam. Moje pytanie dotyczy ram czasowych jakie przyjąłeś podczas tworzenia tej kategorii. Dlaczego za datę początkową przyjąłeś 1969 rok? Produkcję PF 125p rozpoczęto przecież 28 listopada 1967 roku. Byc może kierujesz się tym czy dany pojazd posiada szeroki czy wąski wywietrznik na słupku C. Lecz zmiana tego elementu nastąpiła w 1968 roku, a w latach 1967-1969 nie wprowadzono innych zmian w nadwoziu, które umożliwiłyby rozpoznanie poszczególnych roczników, więc 1969 rok znowu nie pasuje. Po drugie data końcowa, produkcję zmodernizowanego modelu (MR'73) rozpoczęto w maju 1973 roku, do tego czasu wciąż produkowano auta z roku modelowego 72 (MR'72). Pat731 (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Odnośnie oznaczenia Model Roku (MR) zostało ono wprowadzone w 1971 roku w raz z modelem MR'71. W tym przypadku powołuję się na książkę Polski Fiat 125p/FSO 125p autorstwa Zdzisława Podbielskiego. Co do kategorii uznanie za datę początkową X 1968, napewno będzie lepsze niż 1969. Pozdr. Pat731 (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:File:Polonez Truck mr.89.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Witam !

Owszem zmieniłem, ale jest to moja grafika i niestety nie odpowiem ci na pytanie dlaczego zastosowałem daleko idącą cenzurę, nawet nie zapytałeś mnie o zdanie wrzucając starszą wersje zdjęcia.

Nazwa grafiki została nadana przeze mnie i nie ma nic wspólnego z oznaczeniami stosowanymi w dostawczych odmianach Poloneza. FSO talk 14:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply 

Dmitry G (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:GAZ-3309.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:GAZ-3309.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.103.28 18:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:File:Open kitchen and automobiles in Cairo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witam !

Ciężko właśnie stwierdzić czy jest to MR'85 czy 83, jednak ja kierowałem się tym że na zdjęciu nie widać tzw. "noska" no i jeśliby się głębiej przyjrzeć widać spojler przedni z wersji klasycznej.

Pozdrawiam ! --FSO talk 19:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:File:Autosan H9 bus on Taduesza Kościuszki and Mickiewicza intersection in Kraków.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witam. Nie pamiętam kiedy został zmieniony wzór tablic rejestracyjnych. Staram się korzystać z wiarygodnych źródeł. Ten egzemplarz autobusu jest opisany w serwisie Transport.Wroc.Biz Autosan H9-21.41. Nie ma tam daty produkcji, a pierwsza fotografia pochodzi z 2004 roku, czyli wtedy musiał istnieć. Jeżeli masz lepszą wiedzę lub źródła, to śmiało poprawiaj. Co zresztą w tym przypadku już zrobiłeś! Pozdrawiam. Marek Banach (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: Pełne nazewnictwo PF 125p edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witam. Niespotkałem się jeszcze z sytuacją, aby oznaczenia Modelu Roku oraz pojemności silnika występowały razem. Także na dwa pierwsze pytanie odnośnie właściwej kolejności tych oznaczeń nie jestem w stanie odpowiedziec. Natomiast w przypadku wersji kombi i pick-up kodowe oznaczenia MR były używane, analogicznie jak w sedanie. Pozdr. Pat731 (talk) 10:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rapid 135 "5 Speed" edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

I have a small request. The Škoda Rapid 135 always had a five-speed circuit. Thus doesn't need a extra category. I have made a deletion request for that cat. Thanks and regards, ☼alofok☼ 16:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Answer. Please answer there, where i have asked. i am watching you. regards, ☼alofok☼ 15:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

When I search in Google I will find only one score. And that is an advertisment. Also Škoda hasn't anything to show. Regards, ☼alofok☼ 16:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Czarny czwartek na Świętojańskiej i Piłsudskiego. edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witam!

Dziękuję za kategoryzowanie zdjęć. Twój wkład jest bardzo cenny, bo więcej dowiaduje się na świecie o masakrze grudniowej. Ale w poniższych plikach, tablice rejestracyjne są dosłownie niewidzialne. Jeden promil powierzchni zdjęcia. Robiłem maksymalną rozdzielczością. Nawet po powiększeniu, są bezwartościowe owe tablice. Proszę, usuń tę kategorię. --Starscream (talk) 19:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Autoblinda_41.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Autoblinda_41.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:T-54A_tank_in_front_of_the_National_Museum_in_Prague,_Czech_Republic edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:T-54A_tank_in_front_of_the_National_Museum_in_Prague,_Czech_Republic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.102.228 17:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Polski_Fiat_125p_MR'75/MR'76/MR'77/MR'78/MR'79/MR'80/MR'81/MR'82 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Polski_Fiat_125p_MR'75/MR'76/MR'77/MR'78/MR'79/MR'80/MR'81/MR'82 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.102.167 13:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:IMG 0493.jpg i File:IMG 0495.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witaj!

Trzeba rozpoznać i dodać szablon "rename". Pozdrawiam! --Starscream (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Replica_of_the_Samochód_pancerny_wzór_34_armored_car_made_by_Robert_Tirczakowski_and_Tomisław_Kalembka edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Replica_of_the_Samochód_pancerny_wzór_34_armored_car_made_by_Robert_Tirczakowski_and_Tomisław_Kalembka has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.103.174 02:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Replica_of_the_Samochód_pancerny_wzór_34_armored_car_made_by_Leszek_Kusiak edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Replica_of_the_Samochód_pancerny_wzór_34_armored_car_made_by_Leszek_Kusiak has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.103.174 02:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: Zastava 750 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

W przypadku zdjęć o które pytasz, zaufałem rozpoznaniu Autorów zdjęć, który nazwę modelu podali w tytułach plików i ich opisie. Nazwa modelu nie została zakwestionowana przez innych użytkowników Wikipedii. Jeżeli jednak Ty chciałbyś mieć większy dowód poprawności rozpoznania nazwy modelu (widok z tyłu, którego brak), to przenieś je do kategorii nadrzędnej Zastava 750/850. Nie będę protestował. Pozdrawiam. Marek Banach (talk) 14:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H0430-0016-001, Berlin, Autotunnel Grunerstraße, Straßenverkehr.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kształt przetłoczenia na masce, chromowana listwa z boku, oraz kwadratowe przednie lampy (to ostatnie najtrudniej zauważyć). Pozdrawiam --Krótki (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

WHAT? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

One question: What are you doing with all the Skoda Categories? That is no improvment, but a real flop. ☼alofok☼ 17:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I dont see any emotional thinks. Example: Skoda 120 L, the 120 is for the capacity, the "L" for an equipmentversion. That is also apply for L/LE/GL/LS/GLS/GLX/LX. ☼alofok☼ 18:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

SuperTank, please cooperate with other users. It seems that you are creating a categorization system without having spoken to others that work on the same topic. --High Contrast (talk) 15:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. I can't find anything as the categories are currently very confusing. We do not need quite so many branches on these category trees. (could you respond here, please? That way the conversation can be followed by all interested editors) Mr.choppers (talk) 22:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Higher resolution? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You uploaded a larger version of the Praga Piccolo photo. However, the picture you uploaded is not of higher resolution, it's just an uncropped version. I have changed it back, but please take care in the future. Mr.choppers (talk) 22:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pytanie edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jestem uzytkownikiem anonimowym i mam pytanie czy mógłbyś przesłać tą grafikę z flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/berresfords_motors_limited/4127867189/  ? brakuje tego modelu na commons i jeszcze to http://www.flickr.com/photos/tatraskoda/2143851464/, pozdro

Dzień dobry.
Niestety w przypadku zdjęć które mi wskazałeś autorzy zastrzegli wszystkie prawa do nich tak więc nie mogą one być przesłana na Commons. Można jednak spróbować zapytać się autorów czy nie byliby skłonni udostępnić je na zasadzie wolnej licencji.
Jeżeli chciałbyś przesłać jakieś grafiki udostępnione na zasadzie wolnej licencji (lub np. swoje zdjęcia, które chciałbyś w ten sposób udostępnić) to możesz sobie sam bardzo szybko i łatwo stworzyć konto.
Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

A mam jeszcze pytako, czy mógłbyś wrzucić inną fotke Pegaso J4 na commons ? brakuje tego modelu, ale ja się za bardzo nie znam dlatego Ciebie proszę o pomoc. Pozdrawiam

Category:Škoda_120_L_(1987_-_1988)/120_LS_(1986_-_1987)/120_GLS_(1986_-_1987)/120_GL_(1986_-_1988)/120_LX_(1986_-_1987)/130_(1986_-_1988)/135_(1987_-_1988)/136_(1987_-_1988) edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_120_L_(1987_-_1988)/120_LS_(1986_-_1987)/120_GLS_(1986_-_1987)/120_GL_(1986_-_1988)/120_LX_(1986_-_1987)/130_(1986_-_1988)/135_(1987_-_1988)/136_(1987_-_1988) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ŠJů (talk) 20:41, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_136 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_136 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ŠJů (talk) 20:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Samochód_pancerny_wzór_34_armored_cars edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Samochód_pancerny_wzór_34_armored_cars has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ŠJů (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Daewoo_Honker_2000/Honker_2000/Intrall_Honker/DZT_Honker_4x4 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Daewoo_Honker_2000/Honker_2000/Intrall_Honker/DZT_Honker_4x4 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.106.82 11:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Image annotations edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

As per categorization rules only the main subject has to be categorized. That means smaller objects that are not the main subject do not necessarily need to be categorized. For such cases, resourceful Commons Users invented our delightful Image annotations-Tool. With this tool you can mark single objects on any image on Commons. Use this tool instead inserting categories falsely. Thank you for making Commons better. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Polski_Fiat_125p_MR'78/MR'79/MR'80/MR'81/MR'82_1500 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Polski_Fiat_125p_MR'78/MR'79/MR'80/MR'81/MR'82_1500 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.106.229 20:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Picture Request edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

 

This picture you marked as Zil 157. It's part of a german memorial. Is it possible that it is a Zis 151? Zil 157 didn't exist in WW II. And could you archive some of the sections in your user-disk, it's a little bit oversized.Sandmann4u (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

question edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

Do you know which version 126p this convertible is based on? File:Fiat 126p Cabrio in Hungary.jpg Thanks, Mr.choppers (talk) 19:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

"At first I thought that it was a Fiat 126 Cabrio but now I think it can actually looks like a custom conversion. Alos Cabrio was produced in very small quantities. The vehicle's features point it being based on a Polski Fiat 126p 650 produced between 1978 and XII 1984.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)"Reply

I created an image of a way to organize the 126p. This would mean that the mainpage (Category:Polski Fiat 126p) would have six subcategories listed on its page; the four main generations and one page each for the prototypes and the Zastava 126. The FSM Niki, 126e, and 126BIS would fit comfortably as subcategories of the 126p FL.
 

This is just a suggestion, designed to keep the branching down, as currently things are very intertwined (especially for the 650 versions). And could you please respond here instead of on my talkpage? It makes it easier for me (and others, should anyone care) to follow the conversation. I have placed your answer here for that reason. Mr.choppers (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think it might be better to have separate Fiat 126 el and Fiat 126 elx categories. If you dislike the idea of having more categories than we can always not include Fiat 126 elx Maluch which is more or less a rename rather than an actual different vehicle (as opposed to Fiat 126 elx Maluch Town which featured several improvements).
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have an even better idea instead of deleting Fiat 126 elx Maluch lets get rid of Polski Fiat 126p FL and link all its subcategories to Polski Fiat 126p FL. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I would support splitting the el/elx into Category:Fiat 126 el and Category:Fiat 126 elx/Maluch, with the Town and Happy End as subcategories. I don't understand your second comment at all, though. Do you agree in considering the 126 e as a version of the 126p FL? I think it fits better there than grouped with the later el/elx. I also don't know when the Zastava version was built, which is why I gave it such a prominent place in the hierarchy. Mr.choppers (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Category:Fiat 126 elx/Maluch is a bad name because it gives a false impression that elx and Maluch are interchnagable and that both Fiat 126 elx and Fiat 126 Maluch mean the same thing. Which is not true.
As I said there's no point in having a Polski Fiat 126p FL category when Polski Fiat 126p FL 650 category can fill in its role since at that point only the 650 engine version was produced (not counting the 126 BIS which was produced at around the same time and was powered by a 700 cc engine).
Information about Zastava 126 is very scarce. I did managed find out that the Polski Fiat 126p FL was produced in Yugoslavia under the Zastava 126 PGL name but I do not know much beyond that.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Since all 126p FL were of 650cc, the category would not have to include the "650" part. That way, not only is the name more concise, but the 704cc BIS fits better as a subcategory. For more information on the cars themselves, the mainpage article is really the best way to go since commons is mainly an image depository. If the Zastava 126 was only of the FL version, perhaps it should be a subcategory there? Reeegards, Mr.choppers (talk) 14:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Even though all Polski Fiat 126p FL automobiles were powered by a 652 cc the 650 number was present on all the vehicles, also at this point different versions of this vehicle still used "650" in their names, for example 650E, 650El, etc.
As for Zastava 126 I can not give you an answer because it is entirely possible that there were models of Zastava 126 based on earlier versions of Polski Fiat 126p (as I said information about this vehicle is very scarce and from what I found out I can not rule out the possibility of there being earlier Zastava 126 automobiles) but I can tell you that Zastava 126 PGL had to be based on Polski Fiat 126p FL.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_1000_MB_(1964_-_1965) edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_1000_MB_(1964_-_1965) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

alofok* 19:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_1000_MB_(1966_-_VIII_1967) edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_1000_MB_(1966_-_VIII_1967) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

alofok* 19:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_1000_MB_(IX_1968_-_VIII_1969) edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_1000_MB_(IX_1968_-_VIII_1969) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

alofok* 19:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_1000_MB_de_Luxe edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_1000_MB_de_Luxe has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 19:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:T-55AM2 tank in the National Museum of Military History, Bulgaria edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello SuperTank17!

I have just found two categories that you have created some time ago:

One question, SuperTank17: Why did you once use "...in the National Museum of Military History, Bulgaria" and once "...at the National Museum of Military History in Sofia, Bulgaria". Please help to clarify this drawback. --High Contrast (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Forman_135_LS edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Forman_135_LS has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 15:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_135_LS edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_135_LS has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 15:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_136_GLX edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_136_GLX has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 15:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_136_GLX edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_136_GLX has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 15:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_136LX edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_136LX has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_136_L edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_136_L has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_135_L edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_135_L has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_135 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_135 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Forman_135_L edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Forman_135_L has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Favorit_GLX edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Favorit_GLX has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Felicia_LXI edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Felicia_LXI has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Felicia_Combi_GLX_1.6 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Felicia_Combi_GLX_1.6 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Felicia_Combi_LX_1.9_D edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Felicia_Combi_LX_1.9_D has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Škoda_Felicia_Combi_LX edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Škoda_Felicia_Combi_LX has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

alofok* 16:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

a request edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You uploaded File:ANA_M1151_Enhanced_Armament_Carrier.jpg.

I've uploaded over one hundred photos from this individual. I leave a note on each flickr image I upload, telling flickr uploaders that it has been uploaded. It is polite to thank them, but the main reason I do so is to help prevent people, including myself, trying to upload images that have already been uploaded. Yes, eventually the system may tell us an image is a duplicate. It only recognizes duplicates if the resolutions are identical. And the system only warns us after we have done most of the work.

If you don't usually inform flickr users you uploaded their image, could you consider making an exception for Todd Huffman's photos?

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 18:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:FSO Polonez rear.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

To nie jest MR'87 - przełożona klapa tylna od takiego modelu, ale brak dodatkowych okien bocznych ("akwarium"). Pitak (talk) 13:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nie jestem w stanie sobie przypomnieć przodu, zdjęcie ma już prawie rok. Pitak (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:FSO Polonez Truck edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion

Zanim powstanie pomiędzy nami konflikt edycyjny. Zauważyłem, że na podstawie strony "Ocalić od zapomnienia" zmieniłeś datę rozpoczęcia produkcji tego modelu na rok 1986. Niestety jako, iż ta witryna to fansite, bez podanych źródeł, a w dostępnych mi książkach ...Jest u nas fabryka w Warszawie. Opowieść o FSO (1948) 1951-1996, Historia konstrukcji samochodów FSO oraz czasopiśmie Auto Technika Motoryzacyjna z listopada 1989 roku, jedyną podaną datą rozpoczęcia produkcji jest styczeń 1988 roku, to w najbliższym czasie planuje przywrócić starszą wersję tekstu zawartą w tej kategorii. Pat731 (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ja osobiście o wiele bardziej ufam, wymienionym wcześniej pozycjom książkowym wydanym przez FSO lub pod patronatem FSO. Dlatego pozostanę przy swojej wersji. Dodatkowa uwaga dotyczy modelu Truck LB - produkcja tej wersji rozpoczęta została w 1992 roku, więc ustalenie ram czasowych na lata 1986-1992, również jest nie poprawne. Pat731 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Według dostępnych mi źródeł wersje LB i DC, ze względu na pokrewieństwo konstrukcyjne (ten sam rozstaw osi i długość ramy) zostały wprowadzone razem w 1992 roku. Pozdr. Pat731 (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Według następujących pozycji produkcja rozpoczęta została w 1988 roku:

  • ...Jest u nas fabryka w Warszawie. Opowieść o FSO (1948) 1951-1996, Wydawca: Daewoo-FSO Motor S.A.
  • Historia konstrukcji samochodów FSO, Wydawca: Klub pracowników i przyjaciół FSO oraz
  • Album samochodów FSO, Wydawca: Klub pracowników i przyjaciół FSO oraz OW SIMP
  • Fabryka Samochodów Osobowych w Warszawie, Kalendarium 1951-1996, Wydawca: Klub pracowników i przyjaciół FSO oraz OW SIMP

Moim zdaniem są to bardzo wiarygodne źródła, dlatego pozostaje przy swoim zdaniu. Pat731 (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I jeszcze na koniec, oprócz źródeł książkowych, historia Trucka, w skrócie: http://motoryzacja.interia.pl/szukaj/news/ten-samochod-zabil-poloneza,895698 |Pat731 (talk) 18:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Polish_BTR-60PB_with_a_breaker edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Polish_BTR-60PB_with_a_breaker has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Cdw/lang

80.187.106.38 15:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Moved incorrectly named categories edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello SuperTank17/Archive, I just did

Rename Category:Iraqi 9P133 Malyutka tank destroyers to Category:9P133 Malyutka in Iraqi service (1 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.

,

Rename Category:East German 9P133 Malyutka tank destroyers to Category:9P133 Malyutka in East German service (2 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.

and Template:Move cat as to comply with commons naming rules and the naming in its contained subcategories.

Thanks for your support. --High Contrast (talk) 17:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Addendum: I have also moved this category from here to here. Choose shorter category names. Only the most necessary information. More information must be stated in a short category description - as you can see. --High Contrast (talk) 18:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_an_FSO_Warszawa_M20-57_or_200_of_Milicja_Obywatelska.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_UAZ-469-based_police_automobile_of_Milicja_Obywatelska.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_Polski_Fiat_126p_FL_650_of_Policja.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_an_FSO_125p_of_Milicja_Obywatelska_3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_an_FSO_125p_of_Milicja_Obywatelska_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:34, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_an_FSO_125p_of_Milicja_Obywatelska.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_an_early_FSO_125p.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.193 19:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Pf 125p 1500 krk.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Witam. Jaki to jest MR - File:Pf 125p 1500 krk.jpg? Chyba przed '82 bo ma zamek w klapie bagażnika i chromowane wywietrzniki długie czyli jakoś po '75 ale nie umiem dokładnie określić. Pozdrawiam, Pitak (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC).Reply

Znaczek Polski Fiat ale głowy nie dam, bo stał tak że ciężko do przodu było dotrzeć. Pitak (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Fso polonez szary jaslo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Na 99% ma przetłoczenie na klapie. Jak będę tylko w swoim mieście (tak koło świąt) to pewnie się tam przejdę i postaram się pstryknąć mu fotkę tyłu. Pod zderzakiem z przodu ma jeszcze coś na kształt dokładki która mi osobiście przypomina zderzak od wczesnego malucha pomalowany na czarno.

PS co do tego Fiata File:125p old jaslo.JPG. Bierz pod uwagę tył, przód był robiony (na forum znalazłem fotki pod słońce - widać że nadkola były malowane więc może jakiś dzwon i przez to przekładka przodu z nowszego modelu). Dodatkowo tablice KSJ to pierwsza wersja tego układu (3 literki 4 cyfry) stosowana w powiecie jasielskim w latach 70, numer też dość niski - może to ułatwi trochę identyfikację.

PS 2 File:File:125p inny jaslo.jpg - ten jest dopiero dziwny, wiesz coś może o tego typu wersji? Jak mi się uda to zrobię fotkę tyłu.

Pitak (talk) 23:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Duży Fiat edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Witaj, dziś trafiłem na piękny egzemplarz tylko mam problem z dokładną identyfikacją okresu produkcji. File:Pf 125p mr 68 krk.jpg, File:Pf 125p mr 68 krk2.jpg. Byłbyś w stanie pomóc? Pitak (talk) 22:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

W Krk zdjęcia robię telefonem, więc wiele pola do manewru w ustawieniach nie mam, balans bieli jedynie. A co do kąta ich wykonywania, robię instynktownie i w moim subiektywnym odczuciu było ok, na wykonywaniu zdjęć się zbyt nie znam, chcę jedynie wzbogacić galerię o ciekawe egzemplarze. Pozdrawiam, Pitak (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC).Reply

Do you have an idea edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Do you have an idea of which type the dump truck is that is shown here? Look at the characteristic window in the door. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

So you do not have an idea. --High Contrast (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry but I did not have much time to analyze the picture you mentioned. Unfortunately I do not know what truck this is. The cabin does not fit any of the trucks I am familiar with.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay. I suppose an asian manufacturer. Anyway, maybe somebody else has some impulse to give in this issue. --High Contrast (talk) 15:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

126 BIS edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is the matter with you? All 126 BIS should be listed in one group (they are one kind of car), and then people should be able to find them either through the Category:Fiat 126 or the Category:Polski Fiat 126. To split them into two only obscures and hides the photos in question, which is not the point of the Commons. We want people to be able to find photos, not hide them. I will place all BIS photos in a common category, accessible from several different paths, unless you have some very strong reasons to keep these photos separate. Mr.choppers (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:ZAZ-968M_Zaporozhets_with_a_custom_paintjob_and_red_horns.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate –Tryphon☂ 12:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Moskvich and a bus in Moscow.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

By clicking on this file in full resolution or scrolling down to the thumbnail, I see a completely different pic rather than in 800x600 view. Do you have any idea why it is so? - A.S. 06:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Taji tanks.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello SuperTank17!

This edit can be considered as vandalism - although I know you would not do such actions. This file has actually no valid source information for several reasons: "Source = Sellwill" is not considered as a valid source (read COM:L for more information), the uploader must clearly state this when she/he uploads a file (by the way: the information "Source = Sellwill" was created by you and not by the uploader himself). The original upload information was this. This is unfortunately not enought.

Regards, High Contrast 10:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you look at the license tag you will see that it clearly states that Sellwill is the copyright holder thus he is the source as he also uploaded this picture.
Regards.~- SuperTank17 17:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
This might be new to you but this is not sufficient - not my idea, this follows an official policy of Commons (read COM:L for more information). I personally think we could keep this specific file. I assume good faith and I had to help other users with similiar source problems. I suggest to wait if the uploader reacts on my request that I made on his/her talk page. Let's see what happens. --High Contrast (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:FSO Polonez edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Supertank, the amount of text you have added to this cat, is far far too much. The explaination of the content of a category cannot and shall no replace an encyclopedic article. I would prefer if you could cut it short by yourself. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wartburg edit

Porównaj przednie grille :) różnią się w zależności od rocznika, ten tu jest malowany na czarno, nie chromowany, ufam że oryginalnie. I stoi on obok AGH-owskiego basenu koło Piastowskiej (ul. Buszki chyba, nieco w oddali ale widać go obok wejścia, co tydzień go tam widuje).

Which one? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would be happy if you find good categorys and a good description for this images. I don't know what car that is. Thanks! alofok* 21:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: File:Moskvich 400-420 at the Car and Communication Museum in Finland.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. "Moskvich 400" is the exact official name of this model, but if it was decided to include also the internal codes used by the factory for the various versions, I have no problems. However, I fear that the division of sub-categoy will be dispersed far and wide.

Ciao. "Moskvich 400" è l'esatta denominazione ufficiale di questo modello, ma se è stato deciso di inserire anche i codici interni utilizzati dalla fabbrica per le varie versioni, io non ho problemi. Tuttavia, temo che la suddivisione delle subcategorie risulterà molto vasta e dispersiva. --Ligabo (talk) 08:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. This is more of the same insanity that so many of us have rebelled at before. If you absolutely insist that these pictures need subdividing, then divide it into two categories; but there is no need for this number. Also, the category names are very confusing and don't really tell me how to find what I am looking for. The first (or "main") category should be the most general, with subcategories getting more specific as is needed. Mr.choppers (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:People in front of a Kamaz truck in Tajikistan.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, your comment on this edit by you is not correct. English is not to be placed on top because most people understand but english comes the first due to alphabetical order. If there would be an a description in Arab and English, the arab description is to be placed on the top. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

FSO_Polonez edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.95 16:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Picture of North Vietnamese T-54As or Type 59s storming the Independence Palace.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate High Contrast (talk) 09:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:RKhM_"Kashalot",_BTR-70,_BRDM-2_and_BTS-4,_Chernobyl.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate DS (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Picture_of_North_Vietnamese_T-54As_or_Type_59s_storming_the_Independence_Palace.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate High Contrast (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Military fire engines of Afghanistan edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

When you create new categories, please place them correctly. Thank you in advance and happy editing. --High Contrast (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Grey Jelcz truck of the Polish Police on Matejki square in Kraków.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Can you identify the type of this Jelcz truck, please? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately not. My knowledge of Jelcz trucks and buses is very limited.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 16:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
You managed to create those two categories: [14] and [15]. Maybe it is possible for you to purchase some information for this police truck mentioned above so that we have a category for those three images. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:ZSU-23-4MP_Biała.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 91.57.90.5 08:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

MB 2100 vans edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi SuperTank17, and thanks for uploading the images of the van in Krakow. Please note though that there is no model 2100 but this is a 210 D (Diesel) like this one. You might want to move the images to Category:Mercedes-Benz T1 and have that other category deleted. Regards, De728631 (talk) 17:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have deleted this incorrect category and SuperTank17, please only create categories of topics of which you have enough knowledge. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:People_in_front_of_a_Kamaz_truck_in_Tajikistan.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.225 18:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Dacia_Logan_VAN_1.6_MPI_on_Kamienna_street_in_Kraków_(3).jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.64 06:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Dacia_Logan_VAN_1.6_MPI_on_Kamienna_street_in_Kraków_(1).jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.64 06:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sortowanie autobusów edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witam! W ostatnim okresie przejawiasz dużą aktywność w zakresie przesyłania (własnych i z serwisu Flickr.com) oraz sortowania zdjęć autobusów. Nie zawsze pozytywną. Warto byś poznał zasady obowiązujące w kategorii Buses in Poland. Opracowałem dość długi opis na tej stronie. Jak z niego wynika usuwanie kategorii Jelcz buses z opisu zdjęcia i jej nie dodawanie, gdy dodaje się zdjęcie do kategorii Jelcz buses in Poland to błędy, który ostatnio popełniłeś. Do tych kategorii stosują się zupełnie różne kryteria wyróżnienia! We wspomnianej kategorii dotyczącej autobusów w Polsce jest kilka tysięcy dość dobrze skatalogowanych i opisanych zdjęć. To wzory, z których warto korzystać. Opisując zdjęcia autobusów warto rozpoznać markę i model. Dużą pomocą w tym względzie jest specjalistyczny serwis internetowy Transport Wroc.Biz, w którym, znając numer rejestracyjny pojazdu komunikacji publicznej i/lub jego numer taborowy, możesz pozyskać dużo wartościowych informacji do sortowania i opisywania. Przykład: biały trolejbus z MPK Lublin, to ten KPNA/Jelcz PR110E z 1987 roku. Ponadto w wielu miastach Polski działają lokalne serwisy miłośników komunikacji miejskiej podające wiele informacji o posiadanym przez lokalne przedsiębiorstwa taborze. Liczę, że zwolnisz mnie z dużej części pracy nad sortowaniem i opisywaniem nowych zdjęć! Pozdrawiam. Marek Banach (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:126p jaslo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Witaj, mam pewien problem. Chodzi o model w załączonym powyżej odnośniku. Oznaczony został jako FL a mam co do tego wątpliwości - tablica pochodzi z połowy lat 70., wewnątrz występuje licznik tzw. kapliczka, wlew paliwa jest na moje oko metalowy, wlot powietrza pasuje także do wersji z lat 70. Co o tym myślisz? Nie znam się biegle w Maluchach. I jeszcze jedno - File:Pf 125p 1500 jaslo1.jpg - czy to wersja MR'82? Pozdrawiam, Pitak (talk) 12:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC).Reply

Massey Ferguson tractors edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Supertank!

This file has an impressive history of removing and adding categories. Have you enough knowledge about Massey Ferguson tractors? Please be aware of your edits. Reards, High Contrast (talk) 22:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The reason I moved this file to Category:Massey Ferguson tractors was because the shape and the front grill point to this being a Massey Ferguson model but I don't seem to find any evidence that it was produced by ITM.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 22:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK. You can also ask others if you are not sure. User:Bdk has an above-average knowledege of tractors. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:BMP-1KShM.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 79.237.178.19 09:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

KamAZ fire engines edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

What happened with these categories: Category:KamAZ fire engines and Category:Kamaz fire engines? What was your intention there? --High Contrast (talk) 15:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

To change the name of the category by creating a category with the new name and putting a redirect in the original category. But I now I see that all pictures have vanished. I used CatALot to quickly move them to the new category but they're not there. I'll look at my contributions log to see what went wrong. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
It seems I clicked Remove from this Category instead of Move for some reason. It's fixed now. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, please fix that (same issue here, too: Category:KamAZ military vehicles). Nevertheless, what was your intention to move "Category:Kamaz..." to "Category:KamAZ..."? --High Contrast (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Actually there's nothing missing from the Category:KamAZ military vehicles. The reason I changed the names is because I wanted to standardize the Kamaz categories. Right now we have categories using three different ways of spelling Kamaz: Kamaz, KamAZ and KAMAZ. Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
The category transformation from "Kamaz" to "KamAZ" was superfluous. It is likely that you remember that you started the moving from "Kamaz" to "KamAZ" initially. Please no more such fun-edits. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

MSPO 2011 edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Maybe you can transfer some images from here to Commons. Maybe you find some interesting images that could enrich Commons. Hint: You can use this tool. --High Contrast (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:T-54A_or_T-55.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 91.57.83.250 11:13, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:TZI-JVBT.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 91.57.83.250 11:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:AA_HMG_mount,_T-55,_Tivoli_Park,_Ljubljana.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 91.57.83.250 11:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:T-72_Main_Battle_tank_Poland.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 91.57.83.250 11:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:ZiL-130_advert.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Acather96 (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Star 200 edit

Więcej zdjęć nie zrobiłem, ale te 2 samochody są chyba w stałej ekspozycji koło sali BHP Stoczni Gdańskiej.~~

Category:Daewoo-FSO_Polonez_Truck_Plus_ROY_1.6_i edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.107.4 20:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Daewoo-FSO_Polonez_Truck_Plus_ROY_1.9_D edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.107.4 20:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Czechoslovak-produced_T-34-85_tanks edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 79.237.163.206 08:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


File:VAZ-2105 and three people on a side of a road in Frolovo, Volgograd Oblast, Russia.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 20:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:FSO_Polonez_MR'89_1.5_SLE edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.106.144 09:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:FSO_125p_1.3_L edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.107.178 16:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

flickr file edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Can you identify and upload this vehicle/file? Thanks in advance, High Contrast (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

T-55-based fire engine edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

Do you know more about this vehicle? In which country was it built? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Volga_GAZ-M-21_(1956_-_1958) edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.96.31 16:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Volga_GAZ-M-21_(1956_-_1962) edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 80.187.96.31 16:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:GAZ-M-21_Volga_produced_between_1962_and_1965_or_GAZ-21_Volga.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Deerhunter (talk) 14:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:GAZ-M-21_Volga_produced_between_1962_and_1965_or_GAZ-21_Volga_2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Deerhunter (talk) 14:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:UAZ-452V edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

You must write description for categories (per COM:CAT) - especially for your newly created ones. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 15:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sprawdzenie kategorii edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Czesc, widze że tworzyłes kategorie o FSO Polonezie wiec pewnie orientujesz sie dobrze. Dodałem dzis zdjecie z Polonezem File:Polonez PBS Sanok.jpg, ale nie jestem pewien poprawnosci wstawionej kategorii. Jesli możesz to zerknij i ewentualnie popraw prosze kategorię (mam na mysli rocznik). Dzieki z gory i pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 21:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vietnamese_T-54A_or_Type_59_tanks edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate 88.64.116.153 00:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SuperTank17/Archive&oldid=185585923"
Return to the user page of "SuperTank17/Archive".