Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prince Salani Sitting Lonely.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:Prince Salani Sitting Lonely.jpg

(29 Dec 2020) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 42.108.164.5 (talk) 14:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

@Prince Salani D: Could you provide us a rationale as to why this file should be undeleted? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response and WikiData has been deleted, therefore, per COM:NOTUSED and COM:NOTHOST. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BalanRaj Self Photography.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

--Hanuman Rajoo (talk) 08:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Hanuman Rajoo 30122020

@Hanuman Rajoo: Can you provide us a rationale for undeletion? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - The uploader (Balan Raj) appears to purport to be the subject ("Balan raj"). Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject. Accordingly, we require evidence of permission from the actual author (indeed, one can see a person, as opposed to a tripod, in the reflection) to be submitted using the COM:OTRS process. This is, however, moot, per COM:NOTHOST. This is not a notable person, particularly as evidenced by the deletion of every article the uploader has attempted to create on them (!!!); see w:User:Balan Raj/sandbox; w:Draft:BalanRaj; and rejection of w:BalanRaj. Эlcobbola _talk 16:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rabbi Hirschfield.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, our copyright.

File:Rabbi Brad Hirschfield.jpg

Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, President, Clal - https://www.clal.org/team/brad/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shellipsm (talk • contribs) 17:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZPV_Depois3.jpeg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I'm the owner of the rights for this photo, since I'm the person in the picture.

Regards, ZPV

Zpvmau2020 (talk) 18:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZPV Pegou.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I'm the owner of the rights for this photo, since I'm the person in the picture.

Regards, ZPV Zpvmau2020 (talk) 18:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZPV 5PMN.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I'm the owner of the rights for this photo, since one of the persons in the picture and host of the show where the photo was taken.

Regards, ZPV

Zpvmau2020 (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Bonner zoologische Beiträge

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

The relevant deletion requests:

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bonner zoologische Beiträge - Herausgeber- Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (1997) Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bonner zoologische Beiträge - Herausgeber- Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (2007) Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Bonner_zoologische_Monographien_(2011)

These were deleted as the journal was not based on the available information out of copyright, However, subsqeuently information has been found suggesting that the originating journal may in fact have re-licensed material as CC-BY-4.0. see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonner zoologische Beiträge - Herausgeber- Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (1976) (20204767260).jpg

Which means that the journal is compatible with Commons licensing (At least for more recent content).

I am not sure how to check for content from this which was deleted under {{Copyvio}} or speedy tags. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Also affects -

And any subcats in between that were removed under speedy criteria. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Also - See back from https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=303631883 - which are files in subcats, deelted by Dmacks under speedy criteria. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

And many others :(.. Is there a fster way to find these then going through the deletion log manually? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Authors who submit articles to the Bonn Zoological Bulletin are not even informed that the magazine requests all published articles to have any specific copyright license, see Instructions to authors. The only information regarding open access policy is "All published content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution". Regardless, it is the authors who license their articles, not the publisher. Thuresson (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Per Thuresson. Note also the comments made by Verbcatcher at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonner zoologische Beiträge - Herausgeber- Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (1976) (20204767260).jpg]. De728631 (talk) 21:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Jangan delete dan edit kerja saya..thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syed al habib shah (talk • contribs) 19:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

(Google Translate: "Do not delete and edit my work") De728631 (talk) 21:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Please state which file you would like to have restored and why it should be done. You keep uploading images that are unlikely to be your own original photographs and do not seem to fit into the project scope of Commons. @JarrahTree: Can you explain this in Malay please? De728631 (talk) 21:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: User has been indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts and no response will be forthcoming. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Juanminujín.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The image was extracted from a video uploaded to YouTube in cc license by the program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A4exocet (talk • contribs) 20:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose There is no Creative Commons licence for this video in the archived version or in the current page. What you may have seen is the CC button in the archived video. This is, however, for turning on subtitles/closed captions (hover your mouse over the "CC" and you will see a popup notice). A Creative Commons licensing for YouTube videos would be found in the original description, but there is no such thing for this video. See also COM:WHERE. De728631 (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:zhangyaoren.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The image is from the owner Zhang Yao ren. He request me to uploads it. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choosijia (talk • contribs) 21:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose In such cases we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please note also that owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically mean owning the copyright. This is usually held by the original photographer. See COM:OTRS for instructions how to verify a licence by email. De728631 (talk) 21:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

un domingo antes de mi muerte

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

la imagnen de propia autoria que fue pasdo de mi celualr a mi computadora, el contenido de lo relatado es solo un relato con el proposito de ser mas agradecido con la vida y tener mas consiencia de las cosas que nos rodean y nuestros seres amados. la foto no tiene viloncia, la imangen no muesntra temas sexuales, la imagen es de uan pesoan disfrutando un dia bonito — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darwingpazj (talk • contribs) 00:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Regarding File:Ing,. Darwing Paz Justiniano.jpg Wikimedia Commons is not a free web host where non-contributors can upload photos of themselves. Thuresson (talk) 02:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tupolev HQ on the Yauza, Moscow.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Tupolev HQ on the Yauza, Moscow.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: No FOP back then. Now there is FOP for buildings in Russia since late 2014. If this is the same image as w:File:Tupolev HQ on the Yauza, Moscow.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: It is exactly the same image, so we can as well host it here. --De728631 (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Banksy Rat with baseball bat Kentish Town 2005-cropped.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Banksy Rat with baseball bat Kentish Town 2005-cropped.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: file was deleted because Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banksy Rat with baseball bat Kentish Town 2005-cropped.jpg (supposedly a copyrighted artwork). Yet this was kept in an older DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banksy in London, which rules that Banksy's graffiti cannot be copyrighted as the anonymous artist "has a casual attitude to copyright" (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Banksy graffiti). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose This is a poor argument indeed. There is a deletion policy which states that a file can be deleted after a deletion request has been started and all interested have had time to present arguments for and against deletion. There is nothing in the policy that says that a file can only be requested for deletion once. Thuresson (talk) 06:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

@Thuresson: then why do you think {{Non-free graffiti}} cannot be applied here? There has been consensus that Banksy graffiti can be accepted here, per the two DR's I gave here. The affected files were kept. If this file is treated as unfree, then most or all of those kept may also need to be deleted and the consensus on Banksy be revisited. This is inconsistent, to have some images of Banksy graffiti deleted while most kept. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No consensus to undelete. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Banksy-rat-result-part.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Banksy-rat-result-part.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: file was deleted because Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banksy-rat-result-part.jpg (supposedly a copyrighted artwork). Yet this was kept in Commons:Deletion requests/Banksy graffiti, as this is a casual graffiti made by an anonymous artist who "has casual views on copyright." See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banksy in London. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose This is a poor argument indeed. There is a deletion policy which states that a file can be deleted after a deletion request has been started and all interested have had time to present arguments for and against deletion. There is nothing in the policy that says that a file can only be requested for deletion once. Thuresson (talk) 06:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Thuresson (mirrored response) then why do you think {{Non-free graffiti}} cannot be applied here? There has been consensus that Banksy graffiti can be accepted here, per the two DR's I gave here. The affected files were kept. If this file is treated as unfree, then most or all of those kept may also need to be deleted and the consensus on Banksy be revisited. This is inconsistent, to have some images of Banksy graffiti deleted while most kept. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No consensus to undelete. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Second Gorton Ministry.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The deletion nomination was made in early 2019, back when the image of the Second Gorton Ministry was not yet in the public domain. I re-uploaded the image at the beginning of this year, as the image was taken in October 1969, and as it was a government-owned photograph, it went into public domain this year as per the Australian 50-year rule on government images. --Thescrubbythug (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm inclined to support undeletion of this. Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cellar Slug 01.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is my work and I would like it restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealcarmenj (talk • contribs) 22:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose An unidentified species of a mollusc, taken from a distance. There are plenty of good quality photos of this species already at Category:Gastropoda. Thuresson (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cellar Slug 02.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is my work and I would like it restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealcarmenj (talk • contribs) 22:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose An unidentified species of a mollusc, taken from a distance. There are plenty of good quality photos of this species already at Category:Gastropoda. Thuresson (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hong Kong Police Attack Kowloon Mosque.gif

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Delete without meaningful reason, user shizhao dones't give any evidence to mention this file is no permission.--Wpcpey (talk) 06:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Burden to provide evidence does not lie with nominator of the deletion request, but with the uploader or those seeking to keep or restore the file in question. Additionally, the work was first published elsewhere with no evidence of an accepted free licence. Works first published elsewhere require that the copyright holder (i.e. in this case the videographer/still photographer) to send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence to OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- You still don't have any evidence to proof that the work was first published on that website, since the file is gif format with animation. The website is jpeg format.--Wpcpey (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Again the burden is on you, as a party seeking its restoration, to provide evidence -- not the other way around. Please see COM:EVID.
  The image is a still of the video and likely both the image and the gif are derivatives of that video.
  FYI, the image was uploaded to the UDN site on 21 October 2019 and the gif to Commons on the same date. But the assumption cannot be made that the gif on Commons was published before the image on UDN, and there is no evidence that 六四先生 is the copyright holder, seeing as the UDN site attributes the photo to the Hong Kong Islamic Youth Association. Enough significant doubt exist to warrant permission via OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done, per Nat. Thuresson (talk) 23:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ветеран постер4.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File: Ветеран постер4.png was deleted from your website like the file with license problems. However, it is the official Russian poster of film Veteran 2020 - see Kinopoisk - https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/1322967/ I am from Lucky Production company, the distributor of film Veteran. We have transfer of exclusive rights - here you can see it: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BvqQVvZj2dky4AQQovdZZraYcvVAqn9b/view?usp=sharing Could you, please, return the poster of Veteran to the Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natalyluckypro (talk • contribs) 11:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Natalyluckypro: Previously published works require that the copyright holder (not just the mere distributor, which is a licensee -- and per the document, whose rights are geographically limited) send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and if there are no other rationales for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

NasserTone

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

NasserTone

Reason: Important photos of the film director NasserTone with important figures from all around the world. The page's purpose is documentary & not self-promotion. Nassertone (talk) 09:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose All photos are up for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nassertone. Thuresson (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Comrade-yutyo -- Rationale #1

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

File:Red International of Labor Unions.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
The file was of vectorization an asset, which is more the 70 years old and surely non-copyrighted regarding US law. It needs to be undeleted as a result. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 00:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Workers International Relief.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
The file was of vectorization an asset, which is more the 70 years old and surely non-copyrighted regarding US law. It needs to be undeleted as a result. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 00:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Germanrightparty.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
The file was of vectorization an asset, which is more the 70 years old and surely non-copyrighted regarding US law. It needs to be undeleted as a result. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Comrade-yutyo: Being more than 70 years old does not mean that the work is in public domain, and especially in the United States. You would need to tell us where and when the work(s) were first published and created, who was the creator(s) and when they died, if the work(s) was published in the United States within 30 days of first publication if the work(s) were published first outside of the United States. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Such information aren't very clear. If they were I would probably state them. What can be done in this case? Its also not possible to talk with the owners of them as they are more likely died a very long time ago nor someone inherited the copyright ownership cuz all of the stated organizations are abolished nearly a century ago. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 14:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Comrade-yutyo: Unfortunately we cannot proceed without clear evidence that such works are in the public domain. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Orwell-Signature.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This signature is now public domain in the UK, when George Orwell died in 1950. --Frontman830 (talk) 11:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: by Platonides. @Platonides: Please remember to add the appropriate US tag. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

You raise a good point, Nat. Orwell works are now PD in his home country (UK). However, most Orwell works will have been published in US with a notice (not sure if renewed, which would be needed), and won't be PD in US. I'm not sure how to categorize this sample of his signature wrt US law, though. PD-ineligible, maybe, although it's an odd combination. What do you think? Platonides (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrei Koniaev KuJi.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This screenshot was taken from KuJi Podcust, which, if I'm not mistaken, is in the public domain and can be used accordingly.--Maratow (talk) 11:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

No, it's not [2]. Хоббит (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO as work is published under the Standard YouTube License and, therefore, considered non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liz tung 2021a.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

i get a notice of impending speedy deletion because of copyright violation and found elsewhere on the web （https://liztung16.blogspot.com). I wish to appeal undelete this picture because i am the owner of the blog: https://liztung16.blogspot.com and i own the copyright of the photo, u can trace the IP address that i use in uploading this photo and the IP address of the web.

Really hope wikimedia commons can keep this picture, thank you.

Hweimeng (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC) 01/01/2021

@Hweimeng: Oppose No evidence of accepted free licence at source. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Hweimeng: Previously published works require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and if there are no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liz tung 2021.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

received notice of impending speedy deletion because of F3. Derivative work of non-free content (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drWmOE6aqeY), but i am the owner of the youtube channel and own the copyright of the photo, really hope can undelete and keep the photo for me. thanks you.

--Hweimeng (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

@Hweimeng: Oppose No evidence of accepted free licence at source. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Hweimeng: Previously published works require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and if there are no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Capital Hill Washington D.C.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey guys, undelete the photo. USA didnt take the pic and is wideley used on various platforms. Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by DogRiverBrewing (talk • contribs) 21:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

@DogRiverBrewing: Oppose Per USA Today, the photo was taken by a Nicole Gaudiano. Being "wideley [sic] used on various platforms" is not a valid rationale per COM:NETCOPYVIO and point #5 of COM:PCP. As you have stated above, it is "wideley [sic] used on various platforms" and as such was first published elsewhere. Works first published elsewhere require that the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written contract) send permission using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jangan delete kerja saya — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2402:1980:2F4:39E5:117D:B11D:F21:A08C (talk) 07:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. File not named and request was submitted by IP user, and as such, we cannot determined the file(s) in question. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Images (7) 8.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is not mine but free to use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haris Gustap Junior. (talk • contribs) 10:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose No verifiable source. Thuresson (talk) 14:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:154 La cala encantada (Mallorca), de Joaquim Mir.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:154 La cala encantada (Mallorca), de Joaquim Mir.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:154 La cala encantada (Mallorca), de Joaquim Mir.jpg

Author died in 1940, and became public domain in Spain in April. Abzeronow (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Question @Abzeronow: Could you tell us if and when the work entered PD in the United States? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nat, if this file is the same painting as https://www.museunacional.cat/en/colleccio/cala-encantada-majorca/joaquim-mir/010889-000 or w:File:Joaquim Mir - Cala Encantada (Majorca) - Google Art Project.jpg, it's a 1901 painting. Which would be public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mariette M1839 twenty four barrel caplock revolver pepperbox.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Greetings wikimedia

That specific old photograph is from an old encyclopaedia named Πρώτη (Proti) that was published in Greece in 1980s

The user with so called name Herbythyme that deleted the photograph what "evidence" does expect to be "offered" for "confirmation" if it is real? to cut a piece from the encyclopaedia and send it to him to "touch" and to "see" if it is real then or what? just wondering

And he doesn't own εγκυκλοπαίδεια Πρώτη after all

Thank you

Executioners (talk) 07:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose undeletion. @Executioners: Per policy, an uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence.
41 years is not a long time with regards to copyright and the work in question, if published in the 1980s, is not considered to be "old".
Under Greek copyright rules, Copyright lasts for the author’s life and for 70 years after his death, calculated from 1 January of the year after the author’s death.^{[2121/2018 Article 29(1)]}. As such, the work in question is assumed to be copyrighted. Furthermore, as it is unlikely that the copyright holder (i.e. the publisher) has granted a free licence, the usage of {{Cc-zero}} is incorrect.
The file is, therefore, undoubtedly a copyright violation.
Please note: Physically owning a copy of the encyclopaedia or a copy of the photograph does not equate holding the copyright, and being widely available does not equate the work does not mean that the work is in public domain. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nat grusse

Nat are you Nuts or something and pretend that you "know" "everything" instead?

how ridiculous can you be, why you underestimate peoples intelligence?

"....an uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence." for your information the site forgot to send us any permission option so that we could be able to provide any appropriate evidence

"41 years is not a long time with regards to copyright and the work in question, if published in the 1980s, is not considered to be "old"." that applies to your country and not to our country

"Under Greek copyright rules,...." from your country you "know" "better" the copyright rules of our country? since you don't live there don't think so

for your information to our country there are five rules changed every day

"As such, the work in question is assumed to be copyrighted." of course it is copyrighted, what you expected it to be?

"....as it is unlikely that the copyright holder (i.e. the publisher) has granted a free licence,...." that's only to your imagination

"....the usage of Cc-zero is incorrect." you are the incorrect, not to your country but to our country that rare encyclopaedia is in public libraries and freely distributable to everyone for educational purposes

"The file is, therefore, undoubtedly a copyright violation." tell that to yourself "smarty" one

the copyright violation is you

"Physically owning a copy of the encyclopaedia or a copy of the photograph does not equate holding the copyright,...." are you looking with your eyes open? noone said that owning something "equates" holding a copyright

"....and being widely available does not equate the work...." are you looking with your eyes open again? noone said that something being widely available "equates" a work

"....does not mean that the work is in public domain." then why it is in public libraries and freely distributable to everyone for educational purposes?

and remember that haste conclusions make waste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Executioners (talk • contribs) 19:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

beifall

Executioners (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done. Free speech is not the same as free beer. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Greece. Thuresson (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:2010s photographs of Denmark, Category:Stamps of Belarus, 1920, Category:1869 stamps of Brazil, Category:1913 stamps of Brazil

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Either already not empty, or will be filled in within 24 hours (depending in when you read this). ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

@Gone Postal: , done. Thuresson (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tondi Kooli peahoone.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Tondi Kooli peahoone.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: For review of OTRS Ticket:2021010210003586 ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 04:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Tiven2240: Undeleted. Please proceed with the file and add OTRS received in it. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 05:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Paramgoel

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

File:FerozShahKotlaTOP.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
The image above has been captured and saved on my own personal device. Hence there is no question for any sort of copyright claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paramgoel (talk • contribs) 04:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
File:FerozShahKotlaMontage.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
The image above has been captured and saved on my own personal device. Hence there is no question for any sort of copyright claims. This is entirely my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paramgoel (talk • contribs) 05:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

@Paramgoel: It appears that the images are missing crucial EXIF metadata that would indicators that they are the original files. You can reupload the images with their full EXIF metadata intact, or use the OTRS process, as mentioned multiple times on your talk page. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files from Rizarios

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please undelete the following files per ticket:2020122010003354. The owner had sent a valid email in 20 December but the ticket was closed without action (!?) and the files were deleted in 23 December.

-Geraki ^T_L^G 09:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Κώστα στα σβήσανε όλα τα ψευτοδιαβασμένα λαμόγια! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Executioners (talk • contribs) 06:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: restored per ticket:2020122010003354. @Geraki: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Resting Specimen Poster.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:Resting Specimen Poster.jpg Hello, my name is Declan Gale and I am the creator of the poster and all related images. I made this image back in October and have all the rights to it, it isn't even copyrighted. My image was deleted four times from Wikipedia Commons, and I was ignorant to the fact that I was just re-uploading it without explanation and I apologise. The reason for it being a violation was that it was "Film poster artwork", yes, that I made and own! Please may I request an undeletion because this is a false claim as it was my artwork to begin with.

Riwiwiwi (talk) 11:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @Riwiwiwi: Previously published works require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for you understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:picture of Arianna Rosenbluth.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is the graduation photo of my mother Arianna Rosenbluth. She owned the photo, but I only have a digital copy now. Her photos were digitally converted by the family. You deleted it saying it was a copyright violation, but she owned the photo, and now it belongs to the family. Also, we would appreciate it if her photo showed instead of Edward Teller's photo when she is googled.--Mrosenbluth (talk) 19:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Mary Rosenbluth 1/1/2021

@Mrosenbluth: (1) Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Question Could you tell us who is the photographer and in which country the image was taken and first published? (2) We have no control or influence over what appears on web searches. You must take that up with the search engine in question. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No response to query above. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Momin Kavathekar.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The referred photograph is sourced from the subject individual with permission to post on Wikipedia. Same or similar photograph has been used by Print & Digital Media as well. However, those media do not have copyright for this photograph and ownership still rest with Mr Momin. I am just a medium to post it here and even I am not claiming any copyright for these photos. So please re-instate these photograph and also advise how can I include /clarify that these photographs belong to Mr Momin. (Bindhast555 (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

Oppose This was uploaded by you with the information that it is your own photo, that you are the photographer, that you wish to license the photo and that anybody who wish to use the photo must credit you. You need to explain how the copyright of this photo has been transferred from you to the subject and how your claim that you do not claim copyright can be squared with your Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license. You also need to explain what "permission to post on Wikipedia" means, since this is Wikicommons. Thuresson (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Momin Kavathekar in the role of Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The referred photograph is originally available only in hard copy with Mr Momin and I had just made it digital using present digital technology. This is done with due permission of Mr Momin and thus this is sourced from the subject individual with permission to post on Wikipedia.

Similar re-photographing might have been done by other Print & Digital Media as well. However, those media do not have copyright for this photograph and ownership still rest with Mr Momin. I am just a medium to post it here and even I am not claiming any copyright for these photos. So please re-instate these photograph and also advise how can I include /clarify that these photographs belong to Mr Momin. (Bindhast555 (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

Oppose This was uploaded by you with the information that it is your own photo, that you are the photographer, that you wish to license the photo and that anybody who wish to use the photo must credit you. You need to explain how the copyright of this photo has been transferred from you to the subject and then back again and how your claim that you do not claim copyright can be squared with your Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license. You also need to explain what "permission to post on Wikipedia" means, since this is Wikicommons. Thuresson (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vithabai Narayangaonkar Lifetime Achievement Award.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The referred photograph is sourced from the subject individual with permission to post on Wikipedia.

These photographs are from a well known award ceremony and hence, many photographers/ media takes photograph from same position/ angle & time. Hence they appear to be similar. However, photos used herein are sourced from Mr Momin who himself has deployed personals for taking his photograph. And this photograph is obtained from him with permission to use on Wikipedia. Same or similar photos can be in use by print or degitial media. However, that do not make this photo sourced from subject as a copy violation. So please re-instate the photograph.

I am just a medium to post it here and even I am not claiming any copyright for these photos. So please re-instate these photograph and also advise how can I include /clarify that these photographs belong to Mr Momin. (Bindhast555 (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

Oppose This was uploaded by you with the information that it is your own photo, that you are the photographer, that you wish to license the photo and that anybody who wish to use the photo must credit you. You need to explain how the copyright of this photo has been transferred from photographer (the subject's paid staff?) to you. You also need to explain what "permission to post on Wikipedia" means, since this is Wikicommons. Thuresson (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Black Magic Design

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

== File:BMD production.jpg * File:BMD Studio 4k.jpg * File:BMD 0007 poket 6k.jpg * File:BMD 0006 poket 4k.jpg.jpg * File:BMD ursa mini 4.6k.jpg * File:BMD mico cinema camera.jpg * File:BMD ursa mini.jpg * File:BMD poket cinema camera.jpg * File:BMD Ursa 4k.jpg * File:BMD Cinema Camera.jpg ==

Hi, I've spend the entire morning cutting out, scaling, photoshopping and size-optimazing all of this image just for making this page more claear, can I understand why do all of the file has been marked as a possible copyright violation?

Regards Guido Carenza--Guido Carenza (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose It appears that all photos were lifted from blackmagicdesign.com. These product photos are used at several shopping web sites, compare File:BMD production.jpg with [3]. Thuresson (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Question Sorry, I'm just here to help, what can I do to include all the image in the product category of the Blackmagic Design wiki? Can I reuse all the same image and indicate all the source before the manipulation? I was shure that with all the work involved in the editing I was doing the right thing. Regards Guido Carenza--Guido Carenza (talk) 10:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Works of Andrey Shishkin

Latest comment: 3 years ago12 comments3 people in discussion

Hey, I got permission from artist Andrey Shishkin to upload his works on CC-BY license to Commons. I sent it to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org at 25th November 2020 and to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org at 29th December 2020. I still don't receive respond from none of both messages, but today these files were deleted by @Fitindia: . Please restore them and check provided permission:

And I strongly recommended for future to CHECK MAILS and DON'T DELETE RANDOM FILES, because editing list above was very uncomfortable :) --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Question Did you apply {{OTRS pending}} to the files? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Of course. This is why I forwarded mail from Russian adress to this general – according to message, that was displayed in template month after upload. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, that is just wrong then. If the file is clearly marked as OTRS pending, it should not be deleted unless there is a reason to believe that the template is applied in error or maliciously. I vote to

restore and allow regular procedures to run their course, no reason for out of process deletions. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

@Gone Postal and Wojsław Brożyna: The deletion was very much in process as files marked with {{OP}} are subject to deletion after 30 days. Please note that OTRS has a backlog. Furthermore, undeletion cannot be processed here as the files are OTRS dependent. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Wojsław Brożyna: Do you have the ticket number? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nat: Unfortunatelly not, since I still do not received any respond from forwarded permission. I can forward it again if it's a question of problem with localize my mail. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 13:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wojsław Brożyna: There should have been an automated reply with the ticket number. However, that being said, OTRS is unfortuantely unable to accept forwarded permissions for legal reasons. Permissions should be sent directly by the copyright holder to OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh, okay, it was changed since I was last time getting permission from creators. I will write to Shishkin for that he would send it directly to Commons. However, do you have any idea why I don't received respond with OTRS ticket number? --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wojsław Brożyna: Unfortunately, I do not. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Wojsław Brożyna: It seems to be Ticket:2018081110002054, however, as I previously stated the permission is insufficient as it is a forwarded permission. Please continue with your plans to write to the copyright holder to send us the permission directly (mentioning "Ticket#2018081110002054" in the subject heading. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. @Wojsław Brożyna: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request Undeletion of File:Vikhe Patil KALAGAURAV Award.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Moved from Commons:Village pump/Copyright: De728631 (talk) 17:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The comment while removing the subject file states that "While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear".

In this context, please note that original photograph is available in a hard copy with Mr Momin. Individual's permission has been taken to post this photograph on Wikipedia. So please un-delete it as there is no 'digital imprint/ track' which I can mention in the licensing template. And I had merely used present available digital technology so same can be used on Wikipedia. Hence, kindly re-instate this photograph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bindhast555 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

(Bindhast555 (talk) 17:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC))

Oppose @Bindhast555: In such cases we require a permision by email that needs to be sent directly from the copyright holder of the original work. Unfortunately we cannot accept forwarded permissions, so please ask Mr Momin to send an email as outlined in COM:OTRS. Once the mail has been processed and approved by our team of volunteers, the file will be undeleted automatically. De728631 (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

PS: Please note also that a permission for use at Wikipedia alone is insufficient. All uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial activities and the making of derivatives outside of a Wikimedia project. De728631 (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oath of the Young Guard (Soviet resistance).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Oath of the Young Guard (Soviet resistance).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Oath of the Young Guard (Soviet resistance).jpg

The author, Ivan Zemnukhov, died in 1943. Public domain in Russia now. Abzeronow (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Question @Abzeronow: Could you tell us if and when the work entered PD in the United States? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't have an answer for that. The DR seems to indicate a 1942 publication. It appears that it would miss the URAA cutoff date by a few years. Abzeronow (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: In that case, undeletion may only be possible in 2037. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: While in the public domain in Russia and the former Soviet Union, the work may still be protected by copyrighted in the United States. If 1942 is the year of publication, the file may be undeleted in 2037. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BCIX_CI_schwarz.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

the copyright of this file is the same as for File:DE-CIX_201x_logo.svg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwaehlisch (talk • contribs) 23:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Undelete as PD-textlogo. De728631 (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michèle Gavras kidnapped in 1971.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Image was taken by an anonymous soldier from anarchist group OPR-33 in 1971. According to {{PD-Uruguay-anon}}, it enters public domain 50 years after publication. I believe this is now the case Luk (talk) 11:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Info This will presumably happen in 2022, according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Uruguay. Thuresson (talk) 15:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Barring any issues with US copyright, file may be undeleted in 2022 (1971+50+1). Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1gyu111gyu1gyu11.PNG

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:1gyu111gyu1gyu11.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Request temporary undeletion

Reason: The file is still in use by page es:b:Electrónica de Potencia/Diodo de potencia/Problemas de diseño. Could you please temporary restore the file for inserting the TeX, list or table equivalent to the page as it has been done with several images on that page during the last days. Thanks in advance. W_I^KImaniac 18:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@WIKImaniac: The file is as follows

Problema 3 Caso a) tensión media = 400 V Tensión eficaz = 540 V I_O,AVG = 2 A

Cheers, --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: text from file left above and on WIKImaniac's talk page. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The poet Stefan George in 1899.JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:The poet Stefan George in 1899.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:The poet Stefan George in 1899.JPG

Would appear to be a photograph from 1899. Old enough to be PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liu Yuxin, November 8th, 2020.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, first of all, happy new year! I am writing to you to request an undeletion of the image Liu Yuxin, November 8th, 2020.png. I received a notification stating this file is deleted due to a possible copyright violation. I have received a written response from the original author of this photo that they have granted permission for me to upload this picture on Wikipedia; I specifically followed instructions given by this flowchart https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Licensing_tutorial_en.svg/750px-Licensing_tutorial_en.svg.png. I can provide the written response/exchange to the administrator if needed. If possible, I prefer emailing this information in a more private manner instead of posting the written copy on the Wikipedia discussion page due to privacy concerns. Thank you for your assistance and please let me know if this is an email address for me to provide information and evidence. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natgleira1106 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 4 January 2021‎ (UTC)

@Natgleira1106: At Commons:OTRS you will find information on how to deal with written permissions and how private information can be submitted. Thuresson (talk) 03:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

@Thuresson: Hi Thuresson, thank you so much for the update. English is not the original author's first language, is there a Chinese version of this email template:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates? I'm asking because now I'm thinking whether it'd make more sense for the author themselves to create their account and to upload their own work? I noticed that while there is a Chinese version of the Commons and instructions, there is no Chinese version of the email template. I'm concerned whether I need to get a notary to have a Chinese translated version of this email template, which sounds quite complicated...The current written permission is a chat exchange between me and the author agreeing that I can use this information, do you think this image would suffice, or do I need to translate that as well？Sorry for the lengthy question, maybe I'm overthinking this...but thank you in advance for your help! :) --Natgleira1106 (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

@Natgleira1106: Yes, and there are in fact 4 different Chinese language versions of the template at Template:Email templates/Consent/zh, Template:Email templates/Consent/zh-hans, Template:Email templates/Consent/zh-hant, or Template:Email templates/Consent/zh-tw. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Undeletion may only occur when OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission. Once that occurs, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pratyya Ghosh

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I am requesting the undeletion of the files that were deleted long ago. Reasons are pretty simple.

The sculptures are of Hindu Goddesses. Hence the structures you see are written in the Hindu Texts which are in no sense copyrighted. So the sculptures are made under the structures stated in the Hindu Texts. So the maker of the sculptures cannot hold the copyright.
Then there come the folk arts. These religious festivals are part of the folk arts in Indian Sub-continent for around 300 years. In current law (often stated not compatible with recent issues) doesn't allow anyone to demand copyright of folk arts. You'll find clarification from the copyright authority regarding this under the recently controversial "সর্বত মঙ্গল রাধে" song copyright issue in mainstream media.

However, both fall under 15(a) (Link to copyright laws will be founded at the link used as heading) as these are not original work of them, but they are following some stated structure.

Then for because of unclear laws even if I think the sculptures are copyrighted works, then, the creators are not the owner of copyrights for these sculptures. These sculptures are completely made for business. So the sculptures are completely made under the direction and design of the paying authority. So the paying authority takes the copyright from them by the means of money. Now, that authority displays the sculptures for religious reasons and for the devotees to visit. Here is the question lies. These sculptures are not your regular sculpture. These sculptures are instated by doing religious rituals and it is thought as God resides in the sculpture. This is the belief of a whole lot community of 1.161 billion peoples. Also, the government permitted this to happen. So the question is whether God is copyrighted or not. As I already stated that everyone believes and also under the freedom of religious rituals in the constitution of Bangladesh these religious beliefs have been accepted. So under the constitution or religion, those sculptures are almighty GOD himself and not any of your regular sculpture. By this not anyhow you can call these copyrighted to anyone, nor the sculpture or nor the payer.
Now the fact even if I think they are copyrighted then you have to understand their cycles. They are created to complete rituals and then be immersed in water. So that cannot be permanent for sure and they are not being displayed. So in this special cycle, you cannot hold someone owner. When the main goal is to do as stated above for years.
Now still if I say these are copyrighted then, under 72(2) I had not made any infringement to copyrights as I took photographs of a current event by means of Photograph. Since Wikimedia Commons or Internet was not there the law was made, So I can easily assume this as a mass media. Hence these are not copyrighted.

Now the matter is if all of the above is nullified, then I have to say Commons should take necessary actions regarding a significant number of images at

Category:Hinduism,
Category:Hindu festivals,
Category:Hindu art and any of the event or occasion regarding photos in Bangladesh that show any part of pandals made, as they are also kind of artistic works under copyright.

--PratyyaG · Talk 08:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose I am not convinced that Bangladesh has FOP outside COM:FOP Bangladesh. Wikimedia is not massmedia. The concept of "paying authority" does not seem to exist in Bangladeshi copyright law. Also, the first eight files have never been deleted:

Thuresson (talk) 23:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

And what about the religious status of these "sculptures" which makes it different than other sculptures by the constitution of Bangladesh?

Second of all, a law has exceptions, difference aspects and everything. So if you are trying to bind the laws just with COM:FOP Bangladesh then that will also be a kind of mistake.--PratyyaG · Talk 11:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose There is no religious exemption to copyright laws. The DR also seemed well reasoned that these did not fall under FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CONMEBOL Sudamericana (2002-).png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Apenas uma ilustração do troféu Victoralves12 (talk) 01:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/Conmebol trophy files. @Victoralves12: Please read COM:DW. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Does not address issues in DR. Please read COM:DW. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Faísca. Revista de información municipal de O Pino.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Esta obra é propia e, ademais, ten permiso do propio editor da revista (o Concello de O Pino) para seren reproducida do xeito en que se presenta. Antes de eliminar unha fotografía debería terse preguntado caso de ter algunha dúbida. Saúdos--Castelao (talk) 08:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder of the works depected must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cyberne Tyczne 2000.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Proszę o przywrócenie pliku "Cyberne Tyczne 2000" - autorka zdjęcia wyraziła zgodę na jego publikacje. 4.01.2021 Bartłomiej Nowowiejski--BartekNowowiejski (talk) 09:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. This file is OTRS dependent and, therefore, there is nothing to be accomplished here. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Værnes kirke Værnesstolen 2017 Hauglid.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I request undeletion of File:Værnes kirke Værnesstolen 2017 Hauglid.jpg , File:Værnes kirke Nordportalen Hauglid.jpg and File:Værnes kirke Kortaket Hauglid.jpg .

These 3 are mentioned at my talk page. My request also includes

These image are parts of a larger project conserning documentation and new knowlegde about the medieval en:Værnes Church. There were a seminar in 2015, a book in 2016, and my contributions here on wp is a sequel. There is an (unfortunately delayed) OTRS statement on its way as we speak. Bw --Morten Haugen (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hode fra Værnes kirke 005 Pettersson.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Should be covered by {{PermissionOTRS}} (Ticket:2020110710012059)

@Nsaa and Gbawden: . Bw --Morten Haugen (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Reason for deletion: "OTRS: Unaccepted or insufficient permission for use on Commons". Thuresson (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Comment At the time of deletion this file was missing OTRS. Someone would need to confirm that the OTRS ticket you mention applies to this file but when I deleted the file it wasn't Gbawden (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sarajevo SK 01.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following image is granted for publishing on Wikipedia by its own photographer and/or news organization as per the image posted below that is presented as proof: https://i.imgur.com/LLZmIce.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felky (talk • contribs) 13:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: @Felky: Insufficient permission per COM:L. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kong-Rey 2018-10-02T02 20 00Z.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Satellite images from NASA or NOAA are in Public Domain — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.189.220.59 (talk) 14:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Uploaded as "own work". U.S., Europe, India, China, Russia, and Japan operate weather satellites. Thuresson (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grey hair vs Now.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

A User named "C1K98V" erroneously flagged my image "Grey hair vs Now.png", an image taken of myself by my self, to be removed from the image Commons because he claimed "Reason: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work". If the User: C1K98V had done a few seconds of homework he would have found other images of me on Wiki which clearly demonstrate that the image I shared to Wiki Commons is in fact my own work and my own face. I own this image, it is an image of me and I have all copyright to share this image. Please "Undelete" my image "Grey hair vs Now.jpg" so it can be shared freely through wiki commons as it demonstrates clear and provable results of photobiomodulation reversing melanocyte depletion causing pigment loss in hair.

--Corinna Kennedy (talk) 17:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

A consent email has been sent by myself, the copyright holder, for the image "Grey hair vs Now.png" for full release using the links and forms provided through Wiki. --Corinna Kennedy (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose @Corinna Kennedy: Previously published works require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gears 5 Hivebuster Squad.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Gears 5 Hivebuster Squad.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: OTRS permission has arrived, please restore the page. Thank you! Bencemac (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Bencemac: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zoli Toth's HOME ALONE at Dakini festival (2019).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I hereby affirm that I, Alex Boaca, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the following media:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zoli_Toth's_HOME_ALONE_at_Dakini_festival_(2019).jpg

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Alex Boaca 2021-01-04 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexboaca1 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Alexboaca1: As noted on your talk page, permissions should be sent to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Movie TV Tech Geeks News Logo 512X512.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is actually the official logo of my news site Movie TV Tech Geeks that we created.

I'm confused on how this would be taken down or called a copyright violation as we own the logo and created it.

Please advise.

Curt Johnson Editor-in-Chief Movie TV Tech Geeks https://movietvtechgeeks.com/

File:Movie TV Tech Geeks News Logo 512X512.png Pay attention to copyright File:Movie TV Tech Geeks News Logo 512X512.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gooma2 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose From [4]: "You may not: License, sell, rent, lease, transfer, assign, distribute, host, or otherwise commercially exploit our Sites or our Content; Modify, make derivative works of, disassemble, reverse-compile, or reverse-engineer any part of the Sites or any of our Content;" COM:OTRS may be used to verify that the copyright owner has licensed this logo under an acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Per Thuresson. @Gooma2: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dominos falling.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked once applied. Derivative crop of File:Domino_effect.jpg, I am unsure if this crop is redundent to File:Domino_Cascade.JPG, but the deleting reason, and failing license review are both incorrect and should be sent to COM:Deletion requests if it is to be deleted for other reasons. Dylsss (talk) 08:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Dylsss: File:Dominos falling.png is indeed a duplicate of File:Domino_Cascade.JPG. Both File:Domino_effect.jpg and File:Domino_Cascade.JPG were image reviewed at the time of upload and found to be licensed under an acceptable free licence. The current licensing status is more recent. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

If there's no other reason to keep File:Dominos falling.png due to it being a duplicate of File:Domino_Cascade.JPG, then I guess this can be closed. Dylsss (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bandera de Guerra de los Estados Unidos Peru-Bolivianos.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Esta bandera no es un FanArt, esta realizada según la descripción del texto de tratados preliminares que establecieron los gobiernos de Perú y Bolivia en 1880 https://archive.org/details/basespreliminar00perugoog/page/n13/mode/2up https://repositorio.umsa.bo/xmlui/handle/123456789/24044 --Htz67 (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Htz67 ¿Nos puedes decir como has realizado esta bandera? ¿Con cual programa, etc.? Gracias --Ruthven (msg) 15:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Ruthven lo realicé con photoshop --Htz67 (talk) 19:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Reasonably own work. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Estado del Amazonas.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Cual es el motivo de borrar este archivo? este mapa esta basado en mapas de Perú y Bolivia antiguos, https://www.geografiainfinita.com/2018/01/peru-a-traves-de-los-mapas-antiguos/ y en la descripción de tratados preliminares de Perú y Bolivia en 1880 que se encuentran en este libro https://archive.org/details/basespreliminar00perugoog/page/n13/mode/2up https://repositorio.umsa.bo/xmlui/handle/123456789/24044 Este mapa es necesario para poder ilustrar de que trataba el tratado, al igual que otros mapas que me borraron que consistía en dibujos de mapas de otros estados del Proyecto de los Estados Unidos de Perú y Bolivia, el cual no se llego a concretar por la cuestión de la guerra pero que ya había sido aprobada en el congreso de ambas repúblicas --Htz67 (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Done: The deletion request appears to be quite arbitrary: it's the classical kind of localisation map created for Commons. Ruthven (msg) 10:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:State flag of Bolivar Republic (1825-1826).png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Cual es el motivo de borrar la bandera? me la borraron por copyng, sin embargo es un dibujo propio y solo corregí el diseño pues la que se encontraba en wikipedia era errónea, como se puede apreciar en esta imagen sacada de una fotografía de un museo en Bolivia por un medio periodístico boliviano, la primera bandera de bolivia de 1825 tiene diseño vertical https://correodelsur.com/panorama/20160814_la-bandera-nacional.html tambien me borraron la bandera de uso civil File:Civil flag of Bolivar Republic (1825-1826).png Asimismo en el DECRETO SUPREMO del 17 de Agosto de 1825 hace mención de la Bandera Mayor (uso estatal) y la Bandera Menor (Uso Civil) https://www.derechoteca.com/gacetabolivia/decreto-supremo-17-08-1825-1-del-17-agosto-1825 --Htz67 (talk) 19:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Done: DR rationale wasn't supported by any proof, and quite arbitrary. Ruthven (msg) 10:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sello_de_Bolivia_(1826).png

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Solicito la restauración de este archivo, es un dibujo realizado por mi persona, además que es un escudo histórico de Bolivia, como se puede observar en esta imagenFile:Bolivia, from Flags of All Nations, Series 1 (N9) for Allen & Ginter Cigarettes Brands MET DP831931.jpg, dejó también de la ley que habla de dicho escudo, mencionado como Gran Sello de la República https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-18260726.xhtml --Htz67 (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

@Htz67: What was the exact source that you used while making this image? The presented litography cannot be it as the seal there is too low quality. Ankry (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry and Ankry: the description of the design is found in the Law of July 26, 1826; https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-18260726.xhtml; You can also notice the design on some coins of the time, http://www.hubert-herald.nl/Bolivia_bestanden/image018.jpg; or also in some stamps used in documentation http://www.hubert-herald.nl/Bolivia_bestanden/image013.jpg , but in the image of the flag you can see the colors File:Bolivia, from Flags of All Nations, Series 1 (N9) for Allen & Ginter Cigarettes Brands MET DP831931.jpg

Now that the shield is surrounded by branches, it is found in the Law of July 25, 1826: https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-18260725.html

--Htz67 (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Done: Made with photoshop. Several correction made by the user itself: very probably own work. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12 (три точки отсчета), и фильтром на выходе.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I am Skrynnikov Sergey Petrovich a Russian citizen who introduced himself here as Ssp 1.618, speak only Russian, basic knowledge of Boolean algebra and transformation of relay-contact and logic circuits. I have almost no experience editing here, and providing the necessary licenses as proof of authorship. I am the sole author and primary source of my creative works, from idea to development (this is my home hobby), and I submitted these works to Wikimedia Commons under a license

== {{int:license-header}} ==

which are listed below:

Please restore the file

File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12 (три точки отсчета), и фильтром на выходе.jpg

by license:

== {{int:license-header}} ==

Ssp 1.618 (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ssp 1.618: Could you tell us how this file is in project scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nat: To increase the speed and flexibility of data processing in the CPU and RAM, and reliability as in the Kalashnikov assault rifle.

File:Временные диаграммы кольцевых счетчиков последовательного и последовательно - параллельного счета.jpg

Ssp 1.618 (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ssp 1.618: Thank you for responding. However, your response does not answer my query. How does this file comply with our policy on project scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nat: I read the project scope policy - policy on project scope, and realized that all the files I provided do not meet the criteria that meet these policies. Thank you for your diplomatic explanation. I will no longer insist on restoring these files.

Ssp 1.618 (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:OpenPilot on Comma Two.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

== [[:File:OpenPilot_on_Comma_Two.jpg]] is from our open source project... https://github.com/commaai/openpilot/ ==

I've been working with the Comma team on this open source project for over 3 years. The image is based on a pic seen in our readme... https://github.com/commaai/openpilot/blob/master/README.md

The source code points to... https://i.imgur.com/UelUjKAh.png

The team was pleased when I used it in the Comma wiki, so it was disappointing when your team deleted the free-to-use image. Please restore it.

-Erich Moraga — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErichMoraga (talk • contribs) 15:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@ErichMoraga: Which copyright license is correct for this file? If the license requires the copyright owner to be named, then who? Thuresson (talk) 23:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Uploader do not respond with vital information about copyright license and copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 18:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleted Atomium images

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

No FOP in Belgium back then. Now there's FOP in that country since July 2016.

File:Het Atomium in Brussel.jpg

— deleted because Commons:Deletion requests/File:Het Atomium in Brussel.jpg

File:Symbol of Brussels.jpg
File:Brüssel - Atomium von Nordwest - panoramio.jpg
File:Brüssel - Atomium - panoramio.jpg
File:Atomium 2.jpg (also please split the two different images of the same subject. If possible the earlier one will go under file name "File:Atomium.jpg" which is now a redirect)
File:Atomium, Bruxelles.JPG
File:Atomium de Bruxelles.JPG

— deleted because: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atomium - Brussels, Belgium - panoramio.jpg

File:L'Atomium.jpeg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:L'Atomium.jpeg

File:Widok z Atomium 04.jpg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:Widok z Atomium 04.jpg

File:Brussels Atomium.jpg

— the earlier version by a different uploader: please see its log

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: {{FoP-Belgium}}. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sborrisgr.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sborrisgr.jpg From http://www.siegfriedborris.de/download.html: "Die Rechte der Bilder sind frei. Sie können sie gerne z.B. für Ihr Programmheft oder einen Artikel benutzen." (The rights of the images are free. You are welcome to use them, e.g. for your program or an article.) Grimes2 (talk) 09:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Siegfried Borris (the subject) and his heirs are, assumingly, not the copyright holders of the image(s) in question, and have no right to grant a licence for the work(s) in question. Under the German federal copyright law, the photographer is the copyright holder and the copyright cannot be transferred. The subject and their heirs would, assumingly, have an right-of-use, implied or explicit, but that is insufficient to host the work on Wikimedia Commons. Under the German federal copyright law, the duration of copyright is the life of the author (i.e. the photographer) plus 70 years after their death. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done This is a studio portrait and there is no information about the photographer or why Mrs Borris believes that the photos are free to use. Thuresson (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Echoes-Cairo-Middle East Times - 22-28.11.1987.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Этот файл содержит распечатку газеты Middle East Times от 1987 года, на текущий момент мне не понятно решение об удалении с указанием на отсутствие "источника" и "разрешения"; к сожалению источник прекратил свою деятельность и я не в состоянии получить разрешение, данная распечатка газеты была загружена на сайт www.images.squarespace-cdn.com и размещена на www.caracallatheatre.com, я считаю данная картинка может быть размещена в связи с тем, что связатся каким либо образом с источником невозможно --TopGar (talk) 10:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Impossibility to contact the source or to seek permission is not a valid rationale to host the work in question or for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done Since you have edited the article about Middle East Times on ru: and de: you should have at least some idea of where to start looking for a copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Boris Cherniak - motivational speaker, comedian, author, hypnotist.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Official publicity photo available for distribution with proper copyright and fair usage -available at official site [[5]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comedywood (talk • contribs) 14:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose No evidence of an accepted free licence at source and Fair use is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons and non-free content under such a rationale is subject to immediate deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done "for Press and Print Media" will exclude use by anybody for any purpose. Thuresson (talk) 18:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:After Lunch atop a Skyscraper 1932 ph Charles C. Ebbets.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Buonasera,

La mia immagine è stata eliminata con la motivazione che è un atto di valdalismo. Leggendo i termini e le condizioni di wikimedia commons, mi è sembrato di capire che ogni file che istruisce o educa su un determinato argomento sia ben accetta. Il mio scopo era quello di inserirmi dentro le immagini storiche e non cambiavo nient'altro, nessuno guarda le persone che sono nello sfondo delle immagini anche se queste sono molto importanti e fanno parte del nostro immaginario comune. Io non ho cambiato nulla dell'immagini e non mi sembra di aver fatto un atto vandalico, le immagini avevano sempre il loro scopo e la loro storia, nulla cambiava se non questo piccolo insegnamento nel prestare maggior attenzione alle persone catturate nelle immagini storiche che sono rimaste e rimarranno nel tempo. Le immagini che ho utilizzato sono di pubblico dominio, quindi libere di esser utilizzate. Diverse immagini mi sono state tolte come quella che ho messo nell'oggetto.

Cordiali Saluti --Tommasoremondini (talk) 17:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Tommaso Remondini 05/01/2021

Oppose (1) Inserting yourself into an image and trying to pass it off as the genuine article is vandalism, and (2) such a file would be out of scope in any case. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done This is not the place to host your art project and there is no educational use for historical photos where the face of a Wikimedia user has been pasted. Thuresson (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lucky Ali at a concert in Goa.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The photographer has changed the license to Attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/krpics/50806131756/in/dateposted-public/ Kindly undelete this file.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skulblock (talk • contribs) 07:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: File is not under consideration for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

laura cruz serrano

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

efgrt ryewydeteyfd — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 47.17.76.22 (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No file name provided. Please log in and ask again. --Yann (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CDR grey vest.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

== Photo of Ritchie in Grey Vest was fair use; not a copyright violation ==

There was a claim that the image of Ms. Ritchie wearing a grey vest was a copyright violation, and the following link was shared to support that claim:

https://urdu.news18.com/photogallery/international/pakistan-pm-imran-khan-wanted-to-have-sex-with-cynthia-ritchie-snm-305728.html

The image is fair use, on Ritchie's social media, and has been used a number of times before. Please undelete.

--Pakistan2020 (talk) 13:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Per Commons:Fair use. Also, you uploaded this claiming that it is your own work and that you must be credited if somebody wants to use this photo, how can that not be a copyright violation? Thuresson (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Heydar Aliyev Center 2.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The website https://masimovasif.net/ is operated by the uploader Asif Masimov a.k.a. User:Alumni.aserbaidschan — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 101.78.190.130 (talk) 01:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No rationale for undeletion. No evidence of accepted free licence at source. Previously published works require that the copyright holder (e.g. designer, architect, etc) send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:He Jiong.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This image has been deleted. However, the image has not violated any copyright in any form.

Reason: This image was originally published on Weibo at 12th December 2020, 10 PM by the official account Hunan Satellite Television Station to advertise their special event that night (here is the link: https://weibo.com/7421743984/JyarMCLFJ?type=comment#_rnd1609987854557). The account did not state that no one should use any of the images they post during or before or after the day. This means that the image can be used as the collection or any forms other than commercial purpose. Hence, the image does not violate any copyright in any form.--Infinite Prophet (talk) 03:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Unambigious copyright violation per the statement in the request. No evidence of an accepted free licence at source. Furthermore, non-commercial restrictions are not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Please read Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sa Beining.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This image has been deleted. However, the image has not violated any copyright in any form.

Reason: This image was originally published on Weibo on 22nd January 2020 at 12:30 PM. The image is the stage photo of the character to promote the upcoming show, the image was published for fans and other people who have followed the account (The original post's link can be accessed from here:https://weibo.com/5862147128/IqEd1xxpM?filter=hot&root_comment_id=0&type=comment#_rnd1609988602205). The account did not state that no one should use any of the images they post during or before or after the day. This means that the image can be used as the collection or any forms other than commercial purpose. Hence, the image does not violate any copyright in any form. --Infinite Prophet (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Unambigious copyright violation per the statement in the request. No evidence of an accepted free licence at source. Furthermore, non-commercial restrictions are not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Please read Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

More Belgian FOP-reliant images found

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following image files depict FOP-reliant objects in Belgium that were deleted before (prior to the introduction of FOP in the country in 2016):

File:Wevelgem gedenkmonument verongelukte kinderen -2.JPG

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wevelgem gedenkmonument verongelukte kinderen -2.JPG

File:Jeanneke Pis.JPG

— https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File:Jeanneke_Pis.JPG (four different files, on different dates, of the same subject under the same file name, but hopefully they: still exist and not corrupted, under free licensing, and own work or from free files of Flickr etc.)

File:Brussels 2005.jpg

— deleted because of Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Gaston Lagaffe statue.jpg

File:Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - 262 rue de la Cambre (2).jpg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - 262 rue de la Cambre (2).jpg

File:Musée_des_instruments_de_musique_de_Bruxelles.jpg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:Musée des instruments de musique de Bruxelles.jpg

File:Justus Lipsius tout le nord-est 689 MOD.jpg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:Justus Lipsius tout le nord-est 689 MOD.jpg

File:JB Van Helmont monument in Brussells.jpg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:JB Van Helmont monument in Brussells.jpg

File:2005 jeanneke pis01.jpeg and File:Bruxelles-JeannekePis.JPG

— Commons:Deletion requests/Image:2005 jeanneke pis02.jpeg

File:Liege_ambiance_5_Luc_Viatour.jpg.jpg

— Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liege ambiance 5 Luc Viatour.jpg.jpg

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: {{FoP-Belgium}}. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stefan Ruscan cu cimpoiul.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The picture have more than 70 years, unknown author. Have been used before in those books: Țăranu, Petru (2000). Memoria Dornelor. IV. Biblioteca Bucovinei. Adăniloaie, Nichita; Țăranu, Petru (2003). Școala Șaru Dornei- repere istorice. p. 194

Ana Ruscanu (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ana Ruscanu: You uploaded this as your own photo, please clarify. Thuresson (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm begginer so I make lot of mistakes. If you are nice to help me... So... like I have said before (don't ask me where because I'm lost in Wikipediahood) about the picture Stefan Ruscan cu cimpoiul the artist familly gave it to me to use it, in the same way they gave it to Petru Taranu and have been published in 2000. Nobody know who take the shoot in 1936. I didn't pay attention to details but is a Fairy use, in 20 years nobody complained about author rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ana Ruscanu (talk • contribs) 15:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Ana Ruscanu (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose No information about photographer. If this was first published in Romania in 2000 it will be protected by copyright until 2026, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Romania. Thuresson (talk) 06:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Greg Reynoso.jpg I am the photographer of this photo. Please allow me to prove.

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to prove that I am the taking photographer of the deleted photo to reinstate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verdesaint (talk • contribs) 20:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose @Verdesaint: No evidence of accepted free licence at [6]. Previously published works require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion on behalf of the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Reset test 6 low 1x.gif

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, Je ne comprends pas pourquoi mes vidéo File:Reset test 6 low 1x.gif, File:Start test 6 low 1x.gif et File:Stop test 6 low 1x.gif ont été supprimées. Je suis l'auteur (Damien Prongué) de ces vidéos et je publie sous le pseudo Scharf82. 7 janvier 2021 --Scharf82 (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour, bonsoir @Scharf82: Vous pouvez confirmer votre identité et la lier avec votre pseudo en envoyant un courriel à permissions-commonswikimedia.org ou permissions-frwikimedia.org et nous transmettre, par courriel, toute documentation nous permettant d'attester de votre identité comme carte de bibliothèque, carte de sport, etc… (mais surtout pas de documents officiels : CI, passeport). Merci. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NT Handy II.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, La société Witschi Electronic AG qui produit le "New Tech Handy II" m'a fourni l'image File:NT Handy II.png comme elle m'avait fourni l'image File:Chronoscope-S1-G2 FR.png (voir message ci-dessous).

--Scharf82 (talk) 08:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour Monsieur Grass,

Un grand merci pour votre aide. Cordialement Damien

De : Gass Sébastien (Redacted) Envoyé : mardi, 20 août 2019 13:58 À : Prongue Damien (Redacted) Cc : Hessler Thierry (Redacted) Objet : RE: release of Chronoscope-S1-G2 FR.png

Bonjour Monsieur Prongué,

Merci pour votre requête.

Vous trouverez ci-joint l’image demandée ainsi que notre accord par ce mail pour votre publication.

Bien à vous S.Gass

De : Prongue Damien (Redacted) Envoyé : lundi, 19 août 2019 15:50 À : Gass Sébastien (Redacted) Cc : Hessler Thierry (Redacted) Objet : RE: release of Chronoscope-S1-G2 FR.png

Bonjour Monsieur Gass,

Nous aimerions ajouter dans un article Wikipedia, une image d'un appareil de mesure des montres à quartz de type "New Tech Handy II) Serait-il possible d'obtenir l'image d'un tel appareil ?

Pour information, vous nous aviez fourni une image pour le Chronoscope-S1(voir attaché) et vous nous aviez accordé les droits. Nous aimerions donc la même chose pour le Handy.

Nous vous remercions sincèrement pour votre aide. Cordialement

Prof. Damien Prongué Filière Microtechniques Groupe Horlogerie

Haute Ecole Arc Ingénierie (HES-SO) Tél. direct (Redacted) Rue de l'Hôtel-de-Ville 7 Tél. mobile (Redacted) CH-2400 Le Locle Internet www.he-arc.ch/ingenierie

 Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer ce message

De : Prongue Damien Envoyé : samedi, 25 août 2018 17:31 À : Gass Sébastien (Redacted) Objet : RE: release of Chronoscope-S1-G2 FR.png

Bonjour Monsieur Gass,

Je vous remercie pour votre confirmation. L’image est actuellement en accès libre sur Wikipedia.

Très bon week-end Damien

De : Gass Sébastien (Redacted) Envoyé : jeudi, 23 août 2018 16:05 À : Prongue Damien (Redacted) Objet : RE: release of Chronoscope-S1-G2 FR.png

Bonjour Monsieur Prongué,

Sur le principe ok mais je contrôle encore rapidement en interne et reviens vers vous.

Belle soirée à vous S.Gass

De : Prongue Damien (Redacted) Envoyé : jeudi, 23 août 2018 15:59 À : Gass Sébastien (Redacted) Objet : release of Chronoscope-S1-G2 FR.png

Bonjour Monsieur Gass,

Seriez-vous d'accord d'envoyer à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org , avec votre adresse mail professionnelle (Redacted), le text vert ci-dessous. Wikimedia doit contrôler que vous avez bien donné les droits pour ajouter l'image du Chronocope (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chronoscope-S1-G2_FR.png )

D'avance un grand merci pour votre aide Damien Prongué

________________________________________ I hereby affirm that I represent Witschi Electronic AG, Sébatien Gass, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chronoscope-S1-G2_FR.png. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Sébatien Gass Marketing & Product Manager of Witschi Electronic AG 2018-08-23

[generated using relgen]

--Scharf82 (talk) 08:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Scharf82: Permissions should be sent by the copyright holder directly to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org or permissions-frwikimedia.org, not here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Juan Carlos Roel 'Tarrañuelas'. Bilbo, 1997.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago11 comments4 people in discussion

@Regasterios: Why was this image by Soinuenea deleted? Thanks! -Theklan (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Theklan: in December 30 2020 Herbythyme tagged this file with {{No permission since}}. I can't see OTRS permission. The source was this webpage. --Regasterios (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Regasterios: The author and the webpage is exactly the same person. They are uploading their archive. -Theklan (talk) 12:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Theklan: Could you give the number of OTRS ticket what prove this claim? --Regasterios (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

You can just follow the links provided in the descriptions of the photography. There's no OTRS, there's an institution uploading its content to Basque Wikipedia (eu:Berezi:Ekarpenak/Soinuenea) and uploading some of the images they have with the correct Institution template to Commons. Every image has a description with the source, the authorhip, the Institution and a link to the Basque Wikimedians User Group, which is supporting this activity. -Theklan (talk) 12:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Restored and apologies. I see the website does have cc licensing. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Herbythyme: this website's license is {{Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0}}. This one is not accepted on Commons. --Regasterios (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Regasterios: Indeed. They also host audios and videos there that can't be in the Commons because of authorship reasons. They are uploading their content, created by themselves, those items they DO have the right to upload, into Commons. There's no policy saying that I can't have a webpage with content and upload part of that content with a different license into Commons. Because when you upload you are choosing the license ex novo for those items. -Theklan (talk) 14:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Regasterios: and thanks - my bad. License is not compatible with Commons so has to be licensed via COM:OTRS which is exactly where we started from... --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

AFAIK, OTRS has been sent. -Theklan (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. File is OTRS dependent and any actions will be performed or initiated by OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kamya pandey.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This image is not copyrighted and it is available on web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanyut5671 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - If the image is not copyrighted, why did you claim it to be {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}? As the image is indeed from the web, attributed to Raj Gill, why did you claim yourself to be the author? This request is, of course, utter nonsense; please review COM:NETCOPYVIO and refrain from untruthful representations. Эlcobbola _talk

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kamyapandey flyingframes.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This image is not copyrighted and available on web — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanyut5671 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - If the image is not copyrighted, why did you claim it to be {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}? As the image is indeed from the web, attributed to Raj Gill, why did you claim yourself to be the author? This request is, of course, utter nonsense; please review COM:NETCOPYVIO and refrain from untruthful representations. Эlcobbola _talk

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

User:Soinuenea

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

Hello! I was helping User:Soinuenea to create their user page. Soinuenea is a museum devoted to popular music and instruments. Just when we finished the translation of the user page it was speedy deleted, without giving reasons, by @Herbythyme: . They claimed to be "out of scope", but I would like to know what in the description was out of scope. Thanks! -Theklan (talk) 13:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

It wasn't a user page - it was an article. Commons simply hosts media not articles - it should be on Wikipedia. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Is there a written policy that defines the difference between an acceptable self-description on a user page and an unacceptable article? I don't see anything like this on the page Commons:Project scope. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

User pages are for individuals not organisations. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Is this a written policy? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

I disagree. An institution can be at Commons and they can upload content as long as the credit is given. There's no prohibition for Museums to have an user page at Commons:User pages. -Theklan (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: As the username was not OTRS confirmed, the username is a violation of Commons' username policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Asaroton public sculpture, Hanover Street, Boston.JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have obtained permission via email from the creator of this sculpture for use of a photo of it on Wikipedia. How should I proceed?NewtonCourt (talk) 15:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @NewtonCourt: Permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence should be sent directly by the copyright holder to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy statements of permission. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for undeletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion on behalf of the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request by 31.111.12.26

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:ThuWana Shan Ancient Pagoda.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Kaung Mu Kham Ancient Pagoda.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Mai Seik Ancient Pagoda.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

This photo is actually active in Namsang township. You can search this photos location in google. There are not violence your Wikipedia rules and copy right. Please recall this photos. Thank. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.111.12.26 (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Unambigious NETCOPYVIO. Widely available does not mean that the works are freely licensed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nader Vahabi, 16 août 2018, University of California, Irvine.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:Nader Vahabi, 16 août 2018, University of California, Irvine.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

== Nader Vahabi, 16 août 2018, University of California, Irvine.jpg ==

La photographie est une réalisation personnelle et rendue libre de droit par son auteur, Nader Vahabi. Merci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nader Vahabi (talk • contribs) 15:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The user purports to be the subject (Nadaer Vahabi), and claims to be the photographer/author. Unless the copyright was transferred by contract or operation of law, the subject cannot be the copyright holder. @Nader Vahabi: Les droits patrimoniaux nécessaires pour libérer des oeuvres sous une licence libre sont détenus par la personne qui a pris la photo et seule celle-ci peut donner une autorisation de mise sous licence libre, à moins qu'il n'y ait eu un transfert du droit d'auteur suite à un contrat ou une opération légale. Veuillez demander au titulaire du droit d'auteur (c-à-d. le photographe) de nous envoyer une autorisation par courriel à permissions-commonswikimedia.org ou permissions-frwikimedia.org. Merci de votre compréhension. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MontreElectroAffichageAnalo-Swatch.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, Nous (Thierry Hessler et Damien Prongué) qui travaillons sous le pseudo Scharf82 avons obtenu l'aval de la société ETA SA du groupe Swatch Group pour publier la photo . Vous trouverez ci-dessous notre échange de courrier électronique.

Cordialement --Scharf82 (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Salut Damien,

Comment vas-tu ?

Sur demande de la direction (Thierry Conus) et avec mes collègues d’Innovation @ Technology nous avons passé en revue l’article « Montre à quartz » que tu as publié sur Wikipédia. Merci déjà pour la grande qualité de cet article.

Nous avons essayé de mettre à jour les propos technologiques et le rendre le plus compréhensible possible pour les non-initiés. Thierry a proposé de te soumettre nos modifications et de demander ton aide pour réaliser les modifications sur Wikipédia. Est-ce que cette démarche est possible ?

Les modifications désirées sont surlignées en vert dans le fichier joint. J’ai également ajouté 3 images à la fin du document pour mieux illustrer certains chapitres.

Merci encore pour ton aide et pour ta réponse.

Je reste à ta disposition pour toutes questions.

Freundliche Grüsse / Meilleures salutations

Daniel Koch

Competitive Intelligence Product Manager Support Center Innovation & Technology

ETA SA, Manufacture Horlogère Suisse (Redacted) | (Redacted) | Switzerland Phone:(Redacted) | Fax: -

(Redacted) | (Redacted)

This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please do not read, save, forward, disclose or copy the contents of this e-mail. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please delete this e-mail and any copies or links to this e-mail completely and immediately from your system. We also like to inform you that communication via e-mail over the Internet is insecure because third parties may have the possibility to access and manipulate e-mails. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of The Swatch Group Ltd.

--Scharf82 (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Scharf82: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ur210cp soldat.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, Nous (Thierry Hessler et Damien Prongué) qui travaillons sous le pseudo Scharf82 avons obtenu l'aval de la société Urwerk pour publier la photo . Vous trouverez ci-dessous notre échange de courrier électronique.

Cordialement --Scharf82 (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour votre retour.

Bien cordialement,

Pierre Chapeau

Le mar. 1 déc. 2020 à 14:29, Hessler Thierry (Redacted) a écrit : Bonjour,

Merci, c’est parfait. L’image prise est sur la page wikipedia montre à quartz.

Cordialement, Thierry Hessler

De : URWERK Team <(Redacted)> Envoyé : mardi, 1 décembre 2020 13:35 À : Hessler Thierry <(Redacted)> Cc : Prongue Damien <(Redacted)> Objet : Re: Demande autorisation pour article Wikipedia

Cher Monsieur,

Nous vous remercions pour votre demande et l'intérêt que vous portez envers URWERK.

Voici ci-dessous 4 liens avec lesquels vous pourrez télécharger nos photos de l'UR-210. Vous pouvez utiliser la variation que vous souhaitez.

UR-210 CP : https://www.urwerk.com/press/ur-210-cp UR-210 RG : https://www.urwerk.com/press/ur-210-rg UR-210 RH : https://www.urwerk.com/press/ur-210-rh UR-210 FINAL : https://www.urwerk.com/press/ur-210-final

Pourriez vous nous confirmer la photo que vous aurez choisie ?

Nous restons à votre disposition pour tout complément d'information.

Bien cordialement,

Pierre Chapeau Communication dpt URWERK Team

Le mar. 1 déc. 2020 à 09:47, Hessler Thierry <(Redacted)> a écrit : Madame, Monsieur,

Mon collègue, Damien Prongué, et moi-même améliorons un article wikipedia sur la montre à quartz. Nous désirons utiliser une image pour illustrer l’affichage mécanique numérique et remplacer l’image actuelle d’une MB&F HM6.

Serait-il possible d'obtenir une image de votre UR210 libre de droits, ou d'utiliser l'image en attaché ? L'image devrait montrer la montre vue de face. La résolution ne devrait pas être plus basse que 500 px dans la petite dimension.

Nous publierions l'image sur Wikimedia avec la licence "Licence publique Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les mêmes conditions 4.0 International" (ou CC BY-SA 4.0).

Dans l’attente d’une réponse de votre part, nous vous envoyons nos salutations les meilleures, Damien Prongué, Thierry Hessler

	 	Prof. Dr Thierry Hessler

Filière Microtechniques Groupe Ingénierie horlogère

Haute Ecole Arc Ingénierie (Redacted) (Redacted) Tél dir. Internet (Redacted) (Redacted)

--Scharf82 (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Scharf82: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:QuartzMicroCrystal.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, Nous (Thierry Hessler et Damien Prongué) qui travaillons sous le pseudo Scharf82 avons obtenu l'aval de la société ETA SA du groupe Swatch Group pour publier la photo . Vous trouverez ci-dessous notre échange de courrier électronique.

Cordialement --Scharf82 (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Salut Damien,

Comment vas-tu ?

Sur demande de la direction (Thierry Conus) et avec mes collègues d’Innovation @ Technology nous avons passé en revue l’article « Montre à quartz » que tu as publié sur Wikipédia. Merci déjà pour la grande qualité de cet article.

Nous avons essayé de mettre à jour les propos technologiques et le rendre le plus compréhensible possible pour les non-initiés. Thierry a proposé de te soumettre nos modifications et de demander ton aide pour réaliser les modifications sur Wikipédia. Est-ce que cette démarche est possible ?

Les modifications désirées sont surlignées en vert dans le fichier joint. J’ai également ajouté 3 images à la fin du document pour mieux illustrer certains chapitres.

Merci encore pour ton aide et pour ta réponse.

Je reste à ta disposition pour toutes questions.

Freundliche Grüsse / Meilleures salutations

Daniel Koch

Competitive Intelligence Product Manager Support Center Innovation & Technology

ETA SA, Manufacture Horlogère Suisse (Redacted) | (Redacted) | Switzerland Phone: (Redacted) | Fax: -

(Redacted) | (Redacted)

This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please do not read, save, forward, disclose or copy the contents of this e-mail. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please delete this e-mail and any copies or links to this e-mail completely and immediately from your system. We also like to inform you that communication via e-mail over the Internet is insecure because third parties may have the possibility to access and manipulate e-mails. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of The Swatch Group Ltd.

--Scharf82 (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Scharf82: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Heddastiernstedt.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The photographer has given his consent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes87 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Johannes87: Permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence should be sent directly by the copyright holder to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy statements of permission. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for undeletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion on behalf of the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Clitoria tea.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I request to undelete file Clitoria tea.jpg (uploaded by me), because it was deleted without any proper reason. --Unpurrceivable (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. File was deleted as duplicate. @Unpurrceivable: File exists as File:Blue tea.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

That is for education purpose for students to delete traces of online privacy

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

To delete the traces of online privacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satheeshsoft (talk • contribs) 14:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. Not a request regarding a file, a page or a category. Thuresson (talk) 14:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Flag Bolivia 1826

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:State flag of Bolivia (1826).png File:Civil flag of Bolivia (1826).png The design of this flag is drawn by me, it is based on the Law of July 25, 1826, which says: "The national flag will be the same one designated by the general assembly, in the decree of August 17; the five gold stars, an upper yellow sash, and the arms of the Republic in the center, within two branches of olive and laurel. " https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-18260725.html And the flag that makes mention of the decree of August 17, was a flag with vertical stripes as indicated in said decree. https://www.derechoteca.com/gacetabolivia/decreto-supremo-17-08-1825-1-del-17-agosto-1825 The drawing of the flag can be found in the book: Historia de Bolivia, chapter V, page 292, by the author Carlos D. Mesa; https://carlosdmesa.com/2012/08/04/historia-de-bolivia-de-carlos-d-mesa-gisbert-jose-de-mesa-y-teresa-gisbert/

record a video on Facebook, where I show the design of the flag found in the Bolivian history book, https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=431284471609224&id=100041830247840 although there it is only shown without a shield in the Law of July 25, 1826, it mentions "the arms of the Republic in the center, within two branches of olive and laurel." https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-18260725.html , This is the version of the state flag, the flag without a shield is for civil use, like the rest of Bolivian flags. --Htz67 (talk) 05:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Procedural close. No administrator has undeleted the file in over six weeks. Thuresson (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Manyland.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

this image is the logo for Manyland, theirs an article in the draft that needs this for the infobox, it may look like a screenshot but it's an official logo. http://manyland.com/info#places_expander:~:text=Manyland%20developed%20by%20Scott%20Lowe%20%26%20Philipp%20Lenssen%2C%20with%20world%20creation%20by%20all%20of%20you. --Jjkkoopp20 (talk) 20:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jjkkoopp20: Is there any evidence that the logo is published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-4.0 license? Thuresson (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Thuresson: Well, I have posts from the owner, however, the posts are from an in-game feature, and are unlikable. It is a logo, so isn't the point of logos to be used for this type of thing. I'm working with a bunch of people, I even brang the owner of Manyland into this. and this I what he said, (the owner of the image, Philipp Lenssen) https://imgur.com/GUCSNiS Jjkkoopp20 (talk)

Oppose Oppose undeletion on the grounds of Commons:Fair use. Thuresson (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Thuresson: I don't know how much this changes anything, but manyland is a game where every block and creation is drawn (and sometimes coded) by the players, when the players create something it gives the copyright shown in the link below to the content, interesting enough, the person who made the logo doesn't work for manyland, and was a player who made a creation. this means that everything in the image is made from images that came from people submitting content. this means the image is a modified version of a bunch of images with those copyright terms. the image is not a screenshot. and if that's not enough, I'm pending a reply from the owner, either he will state its cc-by-sa-4.0 or he will change it to that. so ill reply here again if needed.

http://manyland.com/info#support:~:text=By%20submitting%20content%20here%20you%20affirm,rights%20to%20access%20this%20content%20( --Jjkkoopp20 (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Escudo Unión Española Femenino.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Imagen creada por mi persona — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franco1121 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Is this a fantasy logo? The real logo is at the soccer club's web site. Thuresson (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose If the image is a fantasy logo, then it would out of project scope, if the logo is real, then it is a copyright violation. In either case, the file would remain deleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Also File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg

Yet again, a sock has requested deletion and an admin has done so. Admin deleted reason: "per del req & info from User:Thoughtful and Considerate"

This is not any of the speedy deletion criteria
Deletion requests failed multiple times: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg
User:Thoughtful and Considerate is blocked for abusing multiple account
Admin deleted 3 hours after deletion discussion started. File has EXIF metadata.

Infrogmation, or any other admin, please undelete both files. I'm just going to upload a local copy on enwiki, because this is the second time an out of process deletion has happened on sock request now... ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Also per Achim55: Both of the images have been loaded up to Commons in 2017. domaintools says that the domain nicholasalahverdian.com has been created in 2018. The sock uploaded the post just now, just like the rest of their deception, and the delete button was clicked without even allowing a community discussion. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per request. --Nick (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HERSHEY'S Chocolate Bar Greatest Milk Chocolate.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:HERSHEY'S Chocolate Bar Greatest Milk Chocolate.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This Hershey bar was photographed and uploaded by me. I am not sure why it is considered copyright, unless it is because it is of a product? Please, let me know. In the past, when I have uploaded official photos of product by the manufacturer, I have been told it can be recreated, so I bought a product and took my own pictures, so I am slightly confused. Kfarren23 (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kfarren23: Commons:PACKAGING would be the governing policy on the matter. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: thank you for the response and link! it was helpful. Based on that, could I take pictures of in-store displays, or is there a non-free content upload option that allows for packaging for identification purposes as readers peruse wiki articles?

--Kfarren23 (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment of a non-admin: @Kfarren23: Commons doesn't allow non-free content. Such images may be uploaded on local wikis (but in reduced quality and resolutions to comply fair use). See also Commons:Fair use, which states Commons does not (and will never) accept fair use. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Support IMO there isn't much copyrightable design here. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Quick et Flupke Bruxelles Wall Paint.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Quick et Flupke Bruxelles Wall Paint.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Belgium has FOP now but this wall painting depicts copyrighted characters from a work of Hergé who died in 1983. Should this be undeleted? Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Belgium has FOP since June 15th 2016: (to me) it is not clear what this means for images that pre-date this resolution. Where copyright laws are not clear, we need to follow the Commons:Precautionary principle. If you can find new legislation on the topic of how this is handled in the Belgium courts, this could of course be of interest! Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Belgium#Freedom_of_panorama & Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama/Archive_2#Belgium Ciell (talk) 18:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Support AFAIK the FOP rule means all copyrighted works displayed in public places are OK for Commons, whatever time they were displayed. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: the wall drawing is OK, but the license at Flickr is NC. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cyberne Tyczne 2000.jpg - disagree with the deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I disagree with the deletion. I sent my permission for using this file. Please, remote it ! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.30.125.71 (talk) 09:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The file will be undeleted if and when it has been successfully processed by an OTRS volunteer. Thuresson (talk) 14:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Who's The Murderer S6.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The photo has been deleted even though it does not violate any rights or rules in Wikipedia and others.

The image of the logo of "Who's the murderer" is a screenshot from MangoTV and crop into a square shape and edit by myself, it is my own work, and it should be ok to stay in Wikipedia. For the original image/video, you can find the video that includes this specific logo from the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOF00bnuNw0&t=2s , the logo appears at the beginning and the end of the entire video. Hence, the photo does not violate any rights and rules. --Infinite Prophet (talk) 12:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Did you follow the instructions posted at your talk page? Do you not have a nagging feeling somewhere that you may actually have overlooked something? Is it really the case that you have a full grasp of image licensing? Thuresson (talk) 15:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 10:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aylan6.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

this photo is ours. our group Aylan dance group. why did you delete this photo Msh1991 (talk) 13:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 10:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gordon Hartman 2019 Headshot.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Greetings -

I am requesting undeletion of the Gordon Hartman 2019 Headshot.jpg. We own the website that this is apparently violating per the message: "This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.morganswonderland.com/about-us/board-of-directors/."

Gordon Hartman has asked the Marketing Team of Morgan's Wonderland to create his Wikipedia page with this information on it.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

--MorgansMarketing (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Nicole Galindo Marketing Manager (Redacted)

Oppose File:Gordon Hartman 2019 Headshot.jpg was uploaded to be used in w:User:MorgansMarketing, which has been deleted as spam. Therefore, the image was uploaded for the purpose of promotion, in violation of COM:ADVERT. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cover of 'Spirit of Garbo' ISBN 9781912622023.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The image of this book cover is licensed under creative commons CC BY-SA 3.0 by the publisher Martin Firrell Company Ltd on their website at this link: http://martinfirrell.com/licensing/sheet-01/. The source expressly states: "these images and their hi-res counterparts are licensed for use under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License". --DrAdamLasserman (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose. Getty images. "LOS ANGELES - 1931: Actress Greta Garbo poses for a publicity still for the MGM film 'Susan Lenox (Her Fall and Rise)' in 1931 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Donaldson Collection/Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)" Thuresson (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christine Redfern.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bonjour,

Je suis l'auteur de cette photographie de Christine Redfern. Elle l'a communiquée en octobre 2017 au journal www.yourlocaljournal.ca pour illustrer un article (https://www.yourlocaljournal.ca/single-post/2017/10/19/christine-redfern-hudson-council-candidate-for-district-4), mais ce journal ne détient pas les droits sur cette image. Merci d'avance pour votre aide et merci s'il vous est possible de restaurer l'image. Bien cordialement, --Orlande Art (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Orlande Art

Please follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS to verify that you the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 04:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kassa - Rákóczi út 1899.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Kassa - Rákóczi út 1899.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kassa - Rákóczi út 1899.jpg

1899 creation would put it within the 120 year rule for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Done @Abzeronow: Nobody has argued against a presumed year of 1899. Thuresson (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Limonadi Elohopea album covers

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Limonadi Elohopea Saippua.jpg

Hello! I kindly ask for undeletion in due the reason we have copyright for the cover.

http://limonadielohopea.com/tuotanto/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pirjo Tieto (talk • contribs) 20:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Limonadi Elohopea Halaus.jpg

Hello! I kindly ask for undeletion in due the reason we have copyright for the cover.

http://limonadielohopea.com/tuotanto/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pirjo Tieto (talk • contribs) 20:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

Oppose Hello. I'm afraid but for all images that have been published before, we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS/fi. Alternatively you may grant a Creative Commons licence for the images at your website – preferably at Halaus and Saippua respectively. This will be much faster than the email process. De728631 (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geometri för grundlärare.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Jag är författare till boken och har gett mitt medgivande till att bilden File:Geometri för grundlärare.jpg publiceras på dess sida på Wikipedia. Därför ska den inte raderas från wikipedia. /Daniel Carlsson

--Carlsson395 (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Hi there, if you are the original author, please send a permission by email as explained at COM:OTRS/sv.

Hejsan, om du är författare, vänligen skicka ett mejl som förklaras på COM:OTRS/sv. De728631 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KiryuCoco.webp

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

該当ファイルは著作権を侵害していません。著作権者より許諾を受けています。直ちに該当ファイルの削除を撤回してください。

Permission has been granted by the copyright holder. Please withdraw your deletion immediately. Also, please administrator speaks Japanese. (machine Translation is fine.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choco2807 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose We need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS/ja.

Machine translation: 著作権者から直接送信されるメールによる許可が必要です。COM:OTRS/jaをご覧ください。

@Yasu: Can you please translate and explain the situation if needed? De728631 (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

著作権者が公式webサイトで著作物の使用を許諾している場合もですか？

Is this also the case when the copyright holder grants permission to use the copyrighted material on the official website?

ここに記載してあります。 It can be found here. [7]

画像の入手元はこちらです。 Click here to see the source of the image. [8]

Choco2807 (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose (English summary follows Japanese) コモンズにアップロードできるファイルは、Commons:ライセンシング#受け入れられるライセンス（以下「COM:L」）に定める条件を満たしている必要があります。お示しのウェブサイトにある「二次的創作ライセンス規約」（以下「規約」）を確認したところ、第 6 条第 3 項において「前二項に関わらず、当社は、いつでも、本ライセンスを停止または終了させることができます」とされており、COM:L の「ライセンスが永久（満了期間がない）かつ撤回不能であること（必須）」という条件を満たしていません。また、第 4 条第 2 項第 6 号「商用利用に関しては、当社より事前の承認を受けるものとすること」の部分は、COM:L の「以下の制限を画像およびその他のメディアファイルにかけてはなりません（中略）一部あるいは全ての利用に際し、製作者への連絡を希望ではなく必須とすること」に合致しないおそれがあります。さらに、第 5 条第 1 項第 8 号でも、「当社が不適切と判断する行為」による利用を認めないとの条件がついているため、完全に自由な利用が認められているとはいえません。したがって、規約の定めのみではコモンズで公開可能なライセンスとしては不十分で、個別に OTRS でフリーライセンスによる利用許諾を受ける必要があるものと思います。ご検討ください。
I inspected The Terms of Use provided by the copyright holder ("the company" hereinafter) and found that: 1) the company can revoke the license at any time, 2) commercial uses require permission beforehand from the company, and 3) usages that the company thinks inappropriate are prohibited. All these things considered, the ToU is not a free license and not compatible with COM:L. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion requests from Australianblackbelt

Latest comment: 3 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

File:Felix Leong logo.png

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo of the martial arts style

Author or copyright owner: Felix Leong

Source (WP:NFCC#4): grandmasterleong.com

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Felix Leong

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the which the logo represents.

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the martial art style

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the style it represents. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:AAMAI Logo.webp

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo of a martial arts non-for profit foundation

Author or copyright owner: Jessie Bowen

Source (WP:NFCC#4): whoswhointhemartialarts.com

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the martial arts foundation the logo represents.

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the foundation

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the foundation it represents. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Loong Fu Pai Logo.png

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo of the martial arts style

Author or copyright owner: Terry Lim

Source (WP:NFCC#4): lfp.com.au

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Terry Lim

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the logo of the style it represents.

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the martial art style

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the style it represents.Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Vinh Xuan Vietnam logo.jpg

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo of the martial arts style

Author or copyright owner: Trần Lê Hoài Linh

Source (WP:NFCC#4): wingchun.com.vn

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Tran Thuc Tien

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the martial arts style logo.

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the martial art style

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the style it represents. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Arnett sport Kung Fu logo.jpg

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo of the martial arts style

Author or copyright owner: Felix Leong

Source (WP:NFCC#4): grandmasterleong.com

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Felix Leong

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the martial art style it represents.

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the martial art style

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the Style it represents. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:AMAHOF Logo.jpg

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo representing a martial arts Hall of fame award organization.

Author or copyright owner: Australasian martial arts hall of fame

Source (WP:NFCC#4): amahof.asn.au

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Australasian Martial Arts Hall of Fame

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the hall of fame which this award represents.

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the Hall of fame award organization it represents.

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the Hall of fame award organization it represents. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Melbourne Sport & Street Wing Chun Kung Fu Logo.jpg

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description: Logo representing a martial arts style

Author or copyright owner: Maurice Novoa

Source (WP:NFCC#4): sifu.maurice.net.au

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Maurice Novoa

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): for visual identification in the article about the Logo representing a martial arts style

Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): No other image would serve to represent the article

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): Image is only used in one article in info box to identify the martial art style

Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): Image is used in the same manner as it is used in news articles to promote the style it represents. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Fair use is not accepted on Commons. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Михаил Пивоваров. Прогулка.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello,

please restore this file. I personally own the original artwork and I took a photograph of it.

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pektusin (talk • contribs) 19:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Owning a piece of art does not automatically make you own its copyright as well. The copyright is held by the original painter unless it has explicitely been transferred in a contract. To keep the file, we need to know the name and lifetime of the original painter to determine if the painting itself is probably out of copyright. If the painter is still alive though, we need a permission by email coming directly from them. What we also need to know is when and where the painting was first published. This is required to determine the copyright status in the United States where the Commons servers are located. De728631 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done The artist died in 2019 and you need permission from the copyright owner to distribute copies of this work of art. Thuresson (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Norainin Ahamedjpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jangan delete saya punya kerja tentang file norainin ahamed.. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2402:1980:8251:FA5B:4889:9C4A:2DA0:6E96 (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. No files named File:Norainin Ahamedjpg or File:Norainin Ahamed.jpg have been deleted. Thuresson (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shubham Singh Receiving Award.jpg Undeletion request

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please Undelete File:Shubham Singh Receiving Award.jpg this file because it's a public pic of award function which is distributed under common usages license Shreetamswain1 (talk) 19:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: User blocked as sock of Enterpreneur01. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Monny Gray Someone's Here.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Suuzam (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@Suuzam: Can you provide us with a rationale as to why File:Monny Gray Someones Here.jpg should be undeleted? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Siegfried Nagl (c) Marija Kanizaj.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please tell my, why the file has been deleted. Thank you. --Kerstin.schreibt (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Because you lifted it from Facebook and then made up a copyright license.

Procedural close, not a request for undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Михаил Пивоваров. Прогулка.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, please undelete the file. This is not "derivative work of non-free content". I personally own the original of this artwork, and I took this picture of the work myself.

thanks --Pektusin (talk) 09:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, double entry. Thuresson (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Le Touquet-Paris-Plage - Villa Les Mutins (B).JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Le Touquet-Paris-Plage - Villa Les Mutins (B).JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Le Touquet-Paris-Plage - Villa Les Mutins (B).JPG

Architect died in 1950. Now public domain in France. Abzeronow (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:يهوذا أين سيدك.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This file is image of a old book of 60 years old in Egypt and we have the copyright and release it for free licenses — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.205.229 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 8 January 2021‎ (UTC)

Who made the drawing on the front cover? Is he or she dead? If so, when? Thuresson (talk) 04:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose No response on a relevant question regarding copyright. Thuresson (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Прасковья Ивановна Самохвалова.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Dear Сolleаgues! This is not a work of art, this is not a monument (standard trivial form). Please restore the file using the De minimis rules (Ex No 5). I didn't know before that there was a new {{De minimis}} temptale (my old discussion). I will now use this template. In addition, the small distant portrait is heavily distorted and photographed specially at an angle. The goal is to confirm the date of birth and death for the Alexander Gavrilov article. — Best Regards, Niklitov (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @EugeneZelenko, Well-Informed Optimist for comment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Gravestone with person photo is main subject of file, so {{De minimis}} claim is not valid. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The portrait cannot be used - it is distorted. We see it. We need dates of birth and death. Here's an example using the {{De minimis}} template: File:Книги Гузель Яхиной.Библионочь 2018. Центральная универсальная научная библиотека им.Н.А. Некрасова 10.jpg. Therefore, personally, I don't see any copyright infringement here when using the {{De minimis}} template. — Niklitov (talk) 13:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: The file cannot be considered de minimis as the copyrighted work is the reason for taking the photo. It fall not under example #5 but #6. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion Requests

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Dear Sir,, Wikipedia has deleted three images from my Wikipedia page File:Royal Medal of Excellence from The Sultanate of Kedah.jpg File:Dato’ Dr.JasG.jpg File:The World First e-Branding Awards 2020.jpg These images are mine I hope to undelete them Regards Mohd1967 (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you the original photographer or are you depicted in the images? Please note that copyright usually is held by the original photographer and not by the person depicted, so we need permissions from the photographers. De728631 (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

What is the permission you need? is there a form or anything else? --Mohd1967 (talk) 07:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion on behalf of the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HM Queen Victoria Opening Parliament.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The artist Alexander Blaikley died in 1903 its therefore PD. Broichmore (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: File has been recreated. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

FileAbhi..jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please don't not delete it because in Google knowledge panel this photo of Abhidcruez is shown --Wettujggvbb (talk) 02:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)kichi

Oppose This rationale has nothing to do with Wikimedia. Thuresson (talk) 08:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dogeposting on wikipedia.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

I want to use this file in a Wikipedia project. The file was deleted because it was claimed to be "out of scope." Commons policy is that any file in use in a wiki project is presumptively within scope.

Streamline8988 (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@Streamline8988: The exact file name is necessary to consider your request. Thuresson (talk) 00:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The file is File:Dogeposting on wikipedia.png. Streamline8988 (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This file is a derivative of File:Shiba inu taiki.jpg with a legend superimposed: "Karen You Horrific Wench. Release me from this Wikimedia file immediately". The original DR was properly closed as Out of Scope, lacking any educational value. JGHowes ^talk 14:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done This meme was only ever used on talk pages according to Delinker log, hence not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Thuresson (talk) 19:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Trinita dei Monti.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted as part of a mass deletion of files uploaded by User:Borgil96. However, the image itself is a non-copyright-eligible photograph of a 1681 painting by w:Caspar van Wittel, which I think would be valuable on the w:Spanish Steps page. I tried to upload it and got a warning it was previously deleted, so I should request undeletion instead. Could it be restored please? TSP (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Done: Restored as per request. I've kept the valid PD-Old-100 license and removed the bogus CC-self license. --rimshot^talk 22:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rohitrajputofficial.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The image was deleted but was in use at Wikidata. --RAN (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - 1) It was "in use" at wikidata because the uploader put it there (we require legitimate use)--an uploader, by the way, a sockpuppeteer who, with socks, created items on non-notable persons and 2) it is a COM:NETCOPYVIO, having appeared elsewhere (e.g., here) before upload. Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. Эlcobbola _talk 21:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AscendantStudiosLogo.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:AscendantStudiosLogo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: The logo features reliable sources and dates, as well as being on top of all authenticity protocols from Wikipedia and Wiki Media. Lsn113 (talk) 12:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This image was deleted for other reasons than being a fantasy logo. Thuresson (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rita Kuhlmann.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is a picture of me. I have the rights.

All the best Besir Zeciri — Preceding unsigned comment added by BesirZeciri (talk • contribs) 17:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Please ask photographer Rita Kuhlmann to verify that you are allowed to claim credit for this photo by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YUPITERGARD BOX ART.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is cover art from a game = promotional material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YuriPiterov (talk • contribs) 07:29, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Even promotional material is copyrighted and non-free by default. It may not be freely used and altered by others without permission from the copyright holder. De728631 (talk) 18:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tasos tryfonos profile.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Mr Tasos Tryfonos asked me to change his picture in Wikipedia because he didn't like the one that was before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marios.ve (talk • contribs) 08:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The copyright of a photograph is usually not held by the person depicted but by the photographer. Therefore we need a permission by email coming directly from the actual copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prince Salani (PS) In 2020.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please don't delete my photo because of my google knowledge panel on Google if you delete it google also remove a pic from his panel I use all wiki community guidelines.

File:Prince Salani (PS) In 2020.png

(Jan 14 2021) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prisaldig (talk • contribs) 17:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This rationale has nothing to do with Wikimedia. Images that only contain text in a standard typeface are out of scope. Thuresson (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: photos are not in scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Талызина 1.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The author of this photo is Sergey Arzumanyan. He is not against publication and can confirm this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitandr (talk • contribs) 10:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose In this case, please ask him to send a permission by email as explained in COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 18:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nicholas Jennings.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This photo of Nicholas Jennings belongs to me. I am the owner the image and have full rights to its use. It appears on my website nicholasjennings.com

I do not feel it infringes on WikiMedia Commons rules and should be undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicocanuck27! (talk • contribs) 13:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically make you own its copyright. The copyright is held by the original photographer and not by the person depicted, unless it was transferred by a written contract. Apart from that we always require a permission from the copyright holder by email when a work was published elsewhere without a free licence. Please see COM:OTRS for more information. De728631 (talk) 18:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LT GENERAL VIJAY LALL PVSM, AVSM,ADC.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File:LT GENERAL VIJAY LALL PVSM, AVSM,ADC.jpg {{subst:drv2 |reason=

Dear Sir Or Madam,

It seems my profile picture has been deleted inadvertently amongst the others.

I hereby affirm that I, VIJAY LALL, the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of LT GENERAL VIJAY LALL, PVSM, AVSM, ADC.jpg [exact URL of the file uploaded on Wikimedia Commons] have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Vijay Lall 14 01 2021

}} Vivepl (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Looks like a studio portrait, not your own selfie. Thuresson (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:thuy Trang in 2020.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have no idea why this photo was removed when the most important part is that I forgot to add source from where it's from; so it's not copyright violation Kinnykellylaifattsfosters (talk) 02:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - 1) As you yourself acknowledge, you took it from Facebook (COM:NETCOPYVIO); 2) This was an unused image of a non-notable person (COM:NOTHOST); and 3) The ridiculous and poorly photoshopped addition of bangs also renders it of dubious educational utility (COM:SCOPE). One also notes uploader's x-wiki history seems germane to the latter two. Эlcobbola _talk 17:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Placchetta in bronzo raffigurante Jules Sambon.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Placchetta in bronzo raffigurante Jules Sambon.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Placchetta in bronzo raffigurante Jules Sambon.jpg

The scupture would now be public domain in Italy since creator died in 1950. Abzeronow (talk) 02:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Per request. --De728631 (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SyedAbdulGaffar.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hey,

The image I uploaded got deleted due to copyright violation, from my own web site. Please help me get the image back on!

Thankyou,

Syed Gaffar — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyedGaffar99 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edivelton da Rosa.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is a photo of me taken by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ediveltonr (talk • contribs) 21:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Previously published at [10]. Photos of Wikimedia users are normally out of scope unless he or she has made considerable contributions. The article about Edivelton da Rosa was quickly deleted from Portuguese Wikipedia, see here. Thuresson (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Template:Abstrakte und Surrealistische Malerei und Plastik

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

In use again. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 23:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Vincent Steenberg: Isn't this the same as {{Abstrakte und surrealistische Malerei und Plastik}}? Thuresson (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@Thuresson: . Yes, you are right. Good find. Thank you. I will turn the above link into a redirect, just in case this problem pops up again. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: procedural close. link redirected to existing file. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by RYLELT7

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This file is not under any copyright as this was taken by Avinash Sachdev. No one, not even, online websites own this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RYLELT7 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Regarding File:Avinash Sachdev.webp, please note that copyright is usually held by the original photographer and not by the person depicted. Owning a copy of the photo does not automatically make Mr. Sachdev the copyright holder. Moreover we have a policy that images that have been published before without a free licence need to verified by the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. As to the film poster File:Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Ek Baar Phir primary image.jpg, the copyright will also rest with the original designer or the production company, so we need a permission by email. Even if you are the designer, please note that in such cases we cannot accept permission from your Wikimedia account only. De728631 (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jan_Hendrych_i_Demko_i_Zbylut.jpg (and others listed below)

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Te author of the following pictures has just sent a proper agreement on OTRS. The depicted objects are contemporary artist's works - but they are all located permanently in public places in Elbląg, therefore Polish FOP apply to them. See ticket:2021011410000431.

List of files:

Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Polimerek: Please attach the OTRS templates to the files. --De728631 (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eclipse total Gorbea 2020.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021011610007011 regarding File:Eclipse total Gorbea 2020.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --De728631 (talk) 22:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Foto 2013 SAV-28-01 CMS.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021010510006943 regarding File:Foto 2013 SAV-28-01 CMS.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --De728631 (talk) 22:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Captain zoya agarwal.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The file was first uploaded on Wikipedia. The date it was uploaded on the mentioned linked of Times of India is a month after it was uploaded by me. Please compare the dates, How could have I caused a copyright issue when I was the first one to upload it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashutosharma (talk • contribs) 00:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Ping @JGHowes: Thuresson (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose I have temporarily undeleted to assist the community in its review. It is true that the 22 December 2020 upload date precedes the Times of India article of 11 January. Nonetheless, this professional-appearing photograph was uploaded with low resolution and lacking original exif metadata, indicating it was photoshopped. The F1 deletion reason should have been, "Insufficient or doubtful author, OTRS validation required", and the uploader should provide original hi-res. version with exif metadata to verify their claim of copyright ownership via OTRS. JGHowes ^talk 14:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per JGHowes. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bishop Olson.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Bishop Olson.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This file is uploaded by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:APalatty (I work for the Office of Bishop Olson - Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth and have the permission to use this image). This photo was taken during Bishop’s first year as bishop of the diocese of Fort Worth. It was shot in St. Patrick Cathedral, Fort Worth. For further clarification (if needed) please contact me at (Redacted). Please do the needful to restore the same. APalatty (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

@APalatty: The best way to do this is to contact the copyright holder. This is probably the photographer, though if they're a diocesan employee it might be the dioceses itself. Then follow the steps in Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator to create a copyright release and email it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. You can put File:Bishop Olson.jpg when it asks you for the filename; when the release is processed the file will be undeleted. Vahurzpu (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bremen Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche Altarfenster (retuschiert).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The same for

Reason:

Meanwhile the dispute between Unser Lieben Frauen parish and Manessier's heirs has been finished. Now the parish is the holder of the rights and permits taking photographs.
See also https://www.kirche-bremen.de/gemeinden/31_unser_lieben_frauen/gottesdienste.php

--Ulamm (talk) 00:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I would rather like to see a source for the transfer of the rights of use for those windows. At least on that website you linked I couldn't find any hint of a public permission for taking photographs. That one image of a window might have been commissioned by the parish with a licence or could have been bought exclusively from Manessier's heirs. De728631 (talk) 00:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

It's more than one, see https://www.kirche-bremen.de/gemeinden/31_unser_lieben_frauen/kirchengeschichte_manessier_fenster.php (That presentation has been published some years before the settlement finishing the conflict)

I am trying to phone one of the officials of the parish, and I shall ask him to write a note in Category:Alfred_Manessier, perhaps creating a subcategory for the Bremish windows.--Ulamm (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ulamm: Please don't ask them to write anything at Commons. What we need is an email as explained in COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Axel Sartingen.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Das Foto

Axel Sartingen.jpg

soll wieder hergestellt werden. Die Freigabe hat sich wegen der Weihnachtspause und Covid-19 verzögert. Die Freigabe liegt mir jetzt vor. Ich sende sie sofort, wenn das Foto wiederhergestellt ist. In der Freigabe sind Dateipfad und Foto exakt bezeichnet, ferner der Urheber, der bislang fehlte. Danke. Einfach machen Hamburg (talk) 14:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
--
The photo

Axel Sartingen.jpg

is to be restored please. The permission has been delayed because of the Christmas break and Covid-19. I have the permission now. I will send it immediately when the photo is visible again. In the permission form file path and photo are exactly marked, furthermore the name of the photographer, who was missing until now. Thank you. Einfach machen Hamburg (talk) 14:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Die Freigabe muss direkt per E-Mail durch den Rechteinhaber erfolgen. Weitergeleitete Freigaben können wir leider nicht akzeptieren, da sowas in der Vergangenheit zu oft gefälscht worden ist.

The permission needs to be sent by email directly by the copyright holder. Unfortunately we cannot accept forwarded permissions since they have been forged too often in the past. De728631 (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ludwig Winter im Jahr 1908.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Own workLao Pei (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose You may have scanned or photographed this card, but a photograph from 1908 is obviously not your own work. The picture is credited to the Takahashi photo studio in Tsingtao which was then a German colony. Now we need to consider Chinese copyright law which has a term of protection of the lifetime of the author plus 50 years. So we need to know the lifetime of the original photographer to determine whether the copyright term has expired. De728631 (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kassai Lajos Lovasíjász.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I would like to request the undeletion of this image. This image was made by a professional artist who passed on the copyrights to the person who ordered the photo (Kassai Lajos). Than, Kassai Lajos gave the rights to publish the photo on Wikimedia Commons. About all that there is an email, where all parties made clear about their will. I do not see the reason why this picture still can not be uploaded to Wikipedia. I understand, that the procedure did not go down as Wikimedia Common requires but I reject the fact that the site refuses to make visible the picture. I was warned not to upload the picture again, so please, let me know how I can make this right so this picture can be uploaded to Wikipedia. I am in connection with both the person who made the picture and with the person who appears on the picture.

Thank you for your understanding and help in advance!

January 15th, 2021. KassaiAmazon --KassaiAmazon (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

If an email with a permission has been sent, it will be processed in due time by our team of volunteers. This may take several days or even weeks because there is a huge workload and only so few people to deal with it. When the permission has been accepted, the image will be undeleted automatically, but until such time our policy requires that we leave it deleted. De728631 (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EF 131 V1.JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This photo appears on page 7 of the 1998 book Secret Aircraft Designs of the Third Reich by renowned Nazi aviation writer David Myhra and it transpired that the deleted file shows a scale model of the planned Junkers Ju 287A-1 made by Gunter Sengfelder. A grainy photo of the EF 131 and project documents for the EF 131 can be found in Gordon (2004) and Griehl (2004). Also note that Griehl (2004, p. 289) identifies the Ju 287 V3 as unarmed and the Ju 287 V5 as the first armed Ju 287 prototype. The photo I've requested for undeletion was taken in 1954 and is thus copyright of Gunter Sengfelder (who was 17 years old when he took the photo). When the photo is undeleted, it should be renamed Ju 287A-1 model.jpg.

References:

Gordon, Yefim, 2004. Early Soviet Jet Bombers. Hinkley, Midland. ISBN 1-85780-181-4.
Griehl, Manfred, 2004. Jet Planes of the Third Reich, Secret Projects: Volume 2. Sturbridge, Massachusetts: Monogram Aviation Publications. Extrapolaris (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian

Oppose The photo may have been published for the first time in the 1998 book by Myhra. This makes it copyrighted and non-free for the lifetime of Sengfelder and an additional 70 years. Since Sengfelder was still active in 1984, the copyright term has not yet expired. Even if it was published before, it would still be copyrighted in Germany so we can't host it here. De728631 (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

CoA of subdivisions of Rome

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

I would request the undeletion of the following files, that were deleted per this proposal. The reason is that I was dead wrong, and Parsival presented me with the proof that I was wrong in requesting the deletion. Once undeleted, it'll be my duty to move them to a better filename and link them to the proper Wikidata item.

Thanks. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

And why would we need all those fictional coats of arms? What is their educational purpose? De728631 (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@De728631: Because they're not fictional at all. They were officially recognised on December 16, 1927 (page 113, it's the last one in the pdf I link) by the municipality of Rome, even though they're not widely used, nor known. Hence, my mistaken definition of "fictional" in the deletion proposal. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh, alright. Thank you for clarifying this. If there are official blazons, I don't see why we should not undelete the images. De728631 (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Sannita: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Galaxia 105.9.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Solicito se restablezca este logo ya que es el logo actual de la emisora y se comprende dentro del template {{PD-textlogo/es}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mleindek (talk • contribs) 23:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The background is not trivial and simple but consists of some intricate colour gradients. This should make the logo copyrightable. De728631 (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grey hair vs Now.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021010410006749 regarding File:Grey hair vs Now.png. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ganímedes:

Done Gbawden (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

But Scope? Gbawden (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: File was used on English Wikipedia prior to deletion. @Gbawden: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sikandar Siddique Frie Grønne.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Frie Grønne are the owners of this picture and i have permission to submit it to Wikipedia Commons. IThotline (talk) 04:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose "Alle rettigheder forbeholdes 2021", eg. "All rights reserved 2021" at [11]. Please ask whoever owns the copyright to follow the instructions at COM:OTRS in order for the claimed copyright license to be verified. Thuresson (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Md Hasibul Hasan Mitul.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

--Md Hasibul Hasan Mitul (talk) 08:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)mitul

Oppose Clearly out of scope. Where would this realistically be used if we undeleted? Gbawden (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Gbawden. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pahlavi king SD.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago12 comments5 people in discussion

Per https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4816175764/. Hanooz 10:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

CC: @Gbawden and Ymblanter: Hanooz 10:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

I am not sure why they think there is no copyright restrictions. What is the country of the origin of the photo (basically, what "North Island" means)? Who is the author? When was the photo published?--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Naval Air Station North Island?

Ymblanter In that case most of the files in the PD-SDASM category must be deleted. [12] [13] [14] for instance. Hanooz 11:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

This is pretty much possible. A 1949 photographs of an unknown author originating from the US would go to the public domain in 2045, unless I am missing something. However, if this is work of a US government employee (not unlikely on a military installation), then it is public domain.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

That is formally put up by the institution under Flickr Commons. They either own copyright and are giving it up, or it became PD. There were lots of possibilities for PD-US-no_notice or PD-US-not_renewed, and given that photo is at a naval base, PD-USGov in this case. A 1949 photo would only be under copyright if it had a copyright notice, and was renewed -- it's highly unlikely actually. Or was unpublished until 2003, but then the question is how does a library have it if that was the case. We don't question institutions judgements under Flickr Commons ({{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}) other than for very good reasons, i.e. it's proven the institution could not own rights, or some critical information is shown to be wrong, or there are country of origin issues outside the institution's country, that sort of thing. I don't understand the deletion at all, since it said no permission was given, unless the photo was not marked with the above template (which states the situation pretty clearly).

Support undeletion. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

At the moment of deletion, the file had no source.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Ah OK, that makes sense then. Thanks. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

The image is part of the Gerald F. Bogan (1894-1973) collection. From what I can gather he collected the photos, doesn't mean he took them or owns the rights to them Gbawden (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

I would defer to the opinion of Clindberg in this situation.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

If it was from an image collection, then it was published at the time, and in that era usually those were without copyright notice. Even if there was, there would need to be a copyright renewal. That is likely the reason the museum put that tag on it. No reason to not trust the museum's judgement on it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pierre Girieud autoportrait.jpg

Painter died in 1948 so this is in public domain in France since 2019. Abzeronow (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Undeleted per request. --De728631 (talk) 12:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Diana- Her True Story.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File:Diana- Her True Story.jpg is my own work and book covers are allowed to be uploaded on Commons. Therefore, I request undeletion. Oshoiyu (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Please ask photographer Patrick Demarchelier to submit a release as described at Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 17:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Recent uploads by User:PJakopin

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request:

The following photographs and diagrams were uploaded by PJakopin after having been published on the website of Ljubljana Caving Society under a Commons-compatible license (which the society arranged with copyright owners). Uploads patrollers weren't satisfied and tagged them as missing permission, then they got deleted before the issue could be sorted. OTRS permissions are now archived for the following:

Photos by Tomaž Planina, permission given by heirs, OTRS ticket 2021011210002237

File:Žiglovica Cave Hammer Brake Rope Descent 1961.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Križna jama cave - Kalvarija 1973.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Operating the Hand Winch in Žankana jama Cave 1969.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:DZRJL Brezno pod gamsovo glavico Cave Expedition Team 1972.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pekel Cave Upper Passage 1975.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:A Shaft in Majska jama Cave 1982.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Križna jama Ponor Outflow 1973.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Križna jama Cave Chimborazo Hill 1973.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Križna jama Cave Prvo Kittlovo brezno Shaft 1975.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Križna jama Cave - Boat in a Passage 1996.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Aragonite Crystals in Ravenska jama cave 1973.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Helictites in Križna jama Cave 1966.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Small Stalactites and Aragonite Crystals in Ravenska jama Cave 1973.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Photo by Primož Krivic, permission given by heir, OTRS ticket 2021011410009147

File:Jože Pirnat - Jozl in the Mt. Kogel Wall, 1967.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Photo by Marjan Richter, permission given by author himself, OTRS ticket 2021011710004717

File:DZRJL Caving Team at Gradišnica Cave in 1957.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Please undelete. — Yerpo ^Eh? 15:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Yerpo: Please attach the OTRS templates. --De728631 (talk) 03:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Authena Agro.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

- The screenshot derivers from a free App available on Play store and App store - I created the picture forAuthena for demonstrative purposes of its technology only

08/01/2021 --Aletacconelli (talk) 14:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose App can be freely downloaded does not mean it have free license. Because this free is restricted to personal use only, which is forbidden on Wikimedia Commons. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 14:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Authena Wine.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

- The screenshot derivers from a free App available on Play store and App store - I created the picture forAuthena for demonstrative purposes of its technology only

08/01/2021 --Aletacconelli (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose App can be freely downloaded does not mean it have free license. Because this free is restricted to personal use only, which is forbidden on Wikimedia Commons. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 14:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:COVID-19 Reflection.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

And also

Hi This image was deleted by "A1Cafel‬" because: "This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://marclee.io/de/10-000-moving-cities-same-but-different-ar/" I'm the owner of marclee.io and created that image. Please see also other images here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Einsgoeins which are on my marclee.io website. Those images I proved by email 2013.

Could you please undelete it?
Do I have to prove it by email?
Could you please let me know what I did wrong, that in the future my images will not be deleted anymore?

Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsgoeins (talk • contribs) 14:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

@Einsgoeins: Comment You have to send it via OTRS, it can be done via Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator. You must agree that you allow anyone to use it for any purpose include commercially, it must be not limited to Wikimedia-only, and you agree that work may be used without notification.

In future, to your images not be deleted:

If this images is your own work and fall within scope of Wikimedia Commons, you may upload it to release under free license
If this images is not your own work:
- For other files
  - If website contains info about free license, ignore two steps below, instead place {{License review}} at files pages.
  - Asking the author to release under free license and send this statement via Wikimedia OTRS release generator as said above.
  - Upload to Wikimedia Commons and place {{subst:OP}} in file description pages
- If work is public domain, upload it and explain why it's public domain (Little note: Public Domain does not simply mean that it is used widely on social network and/or merely make it to public).
- For flickr files
  - Checking the license because may be in some cases who are not author but release under "free" license (flickr-washing author).
  - Upload to Commons

--StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 14:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Previously published works require that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Crystal Powell (comedian).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020123010000427 regarding File:Crystal Powell (comedian).jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose @Ganímedes: The permission is insufficient. Please see the note I left in the ticket in question. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

I've seen it and answer it. I'm not sure to understand your concerns, but I'll release the ticket, in case you prefer to handle it since I think you may have right. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Issues highlighted in ticket have yet to be resolved. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Timmy Trumpet performing at Tomorrowland, Belgium - 2019.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Reason for request to undelete: photo was taken by me (Rutger Geerling / aka Rudgrcom) at Tomorrowland 2019. As the photographer and copyright holder of the image I request to have the file added back again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudgrcom (talk • contribs) 10:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural closure. The file was undeleted by Gbawden to have a proper deletion discussion. The latter is still ongoing so there is nothing to undelete here. --De728631 (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JMP Bristol Rovers v Peterborough United RH 116.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File uploaded by Bristol Rovers FC, who own the licence to the JMP gallery. Club is trying to overhaul imagery available on wikipedia.

SlaterSport (talk) 10:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: We need a permission by email from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS. --De728631 (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pandit Jagannath Guruji.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Pandit Jagannath Guruji.jpg The image is mine, I authorize it.--SaiSid21 (talk) 14:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Pandit Jagannath Guruji --SaiSid21 (talk) 14:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 12.01.21

Not done: Owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically make you own its copyright. Copyright is usually held by the photographer and not by the person depicted. --De728631 (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adrien Barrère31.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Adrien Barrère31.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adrien Barrère31.jpg

Photographer died in 1950 per DR. Abzeronow (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Question @Abzeronow: Could you tell us about its status in the United States? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Description in all public logs indicates the photograph is from 1915. Seems likely to have been published before 1926. Abzeronow (talk) 02:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Per request. --De728631 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Internet Archive document 30yearsofprogres00newy

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(Above per original listing.) These files are not copyrighted, as there is no notice nor timely registration. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC).

Support Those qualify for {{PD-US-no-notice}}. De728631 (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @TE(æ)A,ea. and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg I request the undeletion of the file. The art is mine and it is located in the other parts of the internet because its my book cover.

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I request the undeletion of the file. The art is mine and it is located in the other parts of the internet because its my book cover. The pages to purchase: https://loja.uiclap.com/titulo/ua2807/ or https://www.amazon.com.br/Ba%C3%BA-dos-Sonhos-Emanuel-Freitas-ebook/dp/B08J9Q9X91/ref=sr_1_1?__mk_pt_BR=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&dchild=1&keywords=o+ba%C3%BA+dos+sonhos&qid=1610548288&sr=8-1

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emanuel Parode Campana Freitas (talk • contribs) 17:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Our rules require that images which have been published before be verified by the copyright holder by sending an email. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. --De728631 (talk) 22:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Emile Gouws.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The 1st photos was taken by my late mother.

I am a teacher at EDU360 and gave them permission to use my photo.

The second photos was taken by me during December 2020.

I am kindly asking you to undo the deletion.

--Mieliemeel93 (talk) 15:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Only File:EMILE GOUWS .png has been deleted so far. It should be restored and tagged as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}. De728631 (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Mieliemeel93 and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Acquisition and reversal of a two manipulanda differentiation in sham, neocortically, and hippocampally lesioned rats (IA acquisitionrever00milarich).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This work contains no notice, and it was not timely registered; thus, it is in the public domain. It is not (as far as I am aware) a work of the U.S. government. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC).

Support Per above. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 14:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- User:J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I): This is false; please strike your comment. A work published in the U.S. in 1970 without a copyright notice, and without timely registration in lieu of such a notice, is in the public domain. The guideline you cited is not relevant here; there is no doubt that this work is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC).
Comments replaced. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 14:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Per request. PD-US-no notice. --De728631 (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Omphalocele-drawing.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Image is here https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/omphalocele.html

By the US government "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities"

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Support though the deletion reason sounds like the {{PD-USGov-HHS-CDC}} tag was not applied to the image originally. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Support This is a US Federal Government work. Re Carl Lindberg: It did have a CC by 3.0 licence and no link to any source website – just a written source statement crediting the CDC. De728631 (talk) 12:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Doc James, Clindberg, and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:עידן תלם, תמונת פרופיל.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

hello,this image has deleted. but the image have Commons. pleas give back the image. --Gross2killer (talk) 06:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

We need a permission from the actual copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 12:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mobile Programming Logo.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Mobile Programming Logo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Reason: https://www.mobileprogramming.com/index This is the source url of this logo. The page is of organization and the logo is of the same organization taken from their official website. Pulkit Chowdhry (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose logo of a non-notable company, it is out of scope. — Yerpo ^Eh? 06:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done OP uploaded this to English Wikipedia as fair use, see en:File:Mobile Programming Logo.png. Subject has an article that only exists as a draft, see en:User:Pulkit Chowdhry/sandbox. Thuresson (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BCA-Logo-White.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Dear Wikimedia Moderator

I am Digital Officer for the British Conservation Alliance, the copy right holder of this image and therefore I have the authority to upload it, so it can be used as our icon for our wikipedia page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor1399 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Not obviously within scope as long as the article is draft, see en:Draft:British Conservation Alliance. Thuresson (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Travel diary.pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

It's a travel diary the author wishes to spread through Wikimedia Commons. Undelete, please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinokar (talk • contribs) 17:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Travel diary.pdf. Thuresson (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose If the author was notable, this could be kept. But in this case I'd like to agree with the deletion request. De728631 (talk) 03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson and De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

代表者の承諾済み。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 元祖鶏卵素麺松屋 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please name the file that should be undeleted, and please note also that we need permission coming directly from any third-party copyright holders. See COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 03:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. UD Request incomplete (No file name); OTRS reliant. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Schematische Darstellung des Gefäßbefalles durch retroperitoneale Sarkome .jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, I have the permission from the publishing company "Dr. R. Kaden Verlag GmbH & Co. KG" to use the graphic "3a+b from the publication of Professor Schwarzbach in CHAZ4-2012". Furthermore the publishing company comfirmed that the graphic is license free in gernal. Could you please pulish the graphic "Schematische Darstellung des Gefäßbefalles durch retroperitoneale Sarkome .jpg" again on this page --PI-BNC (talk) 10:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Any such permissions need to come directly from the copyright holder using the email process described in COM:OTRS. Moreover, a permission to use a file on Wikipedia is insufficient. All uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial activities off Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gruene Redesign Logo pfade.pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Party Logo of https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verdi_Gr%C3%BCne_V%C3%ABrc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verdi Grüne Vërc (talk • contribs) 11:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The logo is still copyrighted, so we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. Moreover, we don't store graphics in a PDF file. A logo should be uploaded in a raster of vector image format like JPG or SVG. De728631 (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NedHallowell.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is a request to undelete the image: File:NedHallowell.jpg

It was deleted b/c the account claimed the image could be found elsewhere online. I took the image myself on my phone so that's why there is no EXIF data as they also claimed as a reason for deletion. Please help me un-delete this image as it was deleted for reasons that are just not true. 108.46.56.70 15:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This picture was taken from a video that was published here without a free licence. Our rules require that such uploads at Commons need to be verified by an email that comes directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. Once this email has been processed by our team of volunteers, the file will be undeleted automatically. Alternatively you may want to grant a free licence for the original video at TikTok. This would speed up the process considerably. De728631 (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Szécsi Ferenc-1.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This photo was originally published in 1925 in the book of Ferenc Szécsi. See the book here, click on the word belelapozok ("I flip through the book") and flip right. The photographer was not named, the image was scanned by a Hungarian Wikipedist, at first on huwiki here. Tambo transferred it to Commons in 2016 after editing strongly. After deleting here the Wikipedist uploaded this photo again to huwiki: hu:Fájl:Szecsi Ferenc költő 1925.jpg. The photographer is unknown. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Qualifies for {{PD-HU-unknown}} and {{PD-EU-anonymous}}. De728631 (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Regasterios and De728631: FYI. @Regasterios: Please make the necessary changes. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:New Playtika Logo.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, Main infobox. The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work for which it serves as cover art. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show a primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the creator providing graphic design services to relevant concerns and video game marketing to the public.

Use of the cover art in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy and fair use under United States copyright law as described above.

Please undelete this. Thanks Itai — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItaiPlaytika (talk • contribs) 16:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Commons:Fair use. Thuresson (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A design comparison between IPv4 and IPv6 in the context of MYSEA, and implementation of an IPv6 MYSEA prototype (IA adesigncompariso10945938).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

ShakespeareFan00: What part of this has third-party copyright? The work, as far as I can see, is PD-USGov, and I don’t see any figures off-hand that are under third-party copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC).

Oppose Actually this is a duplicate of the above document File:A Design Comparison between IPv4 and IPv6 in the Context of MYSEA, and Implementation of an IPv6 MYS. (IA adesigncompariso109459860).pdf. There is no need in having both of them. De728631 (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Denarau Island, Fiji, 2013 (4).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2013081510006311 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 19:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

@Thuresson: Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: by Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jacob Markstorm Flames.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I paid for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoolKidSaysHello (talk • contribs) 03:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. No valid rationale for undeletion. @KoolKidSaysHello: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:O Verdadeiro Inimigo por Tcheller Durrep.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This picture must be restored, you can not judge that it’s violating anything since you cannot prove that I am not authorised to use it, in what base can you affirm that? Why are you deleting? You don’t t have any proof, Who is claiming it’s rights??? I am the owner of this picture, it belongs to me, I have all rights concerning it. I produced it and I have full rights to use it anywhere. it should not be deleted! what kind of criteria is this? Please restore it, This is not a fair decision! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcheller (talk • contribs) 05:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Tcheller: per COM:EVID, the burden is yours. Previous published work require permission from the copyright holder via the OTRS process. Please see COM:OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tcheller Durrep.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This picture must be restored, you can not judge that it’s violating anything since you cannot prove that I am not authorised to use it, in what base can you affirm that? Why are you deleting? You don’t t have any proof, Who is claiming it’s rights??? I am the owner of this picture, it belongs to me, I have all rights concerning it. I produced it and I have full rights to use it anywhere. it should not be deleted! what kind of criteria is this? Please restore it, This is not a fair decision! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcheller (talk • contribs) 05:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Tcheller: per COM:EVID, the burden is yours. Previous published work require permission from the copyright holder via the OTRS process. Please see COM:OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sachdev in 2018.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Give me proof that this file is copyrighted. This picture does not have a copyright license anywhere so how do you expect me to provide Commons with one? I own this picture. You guys do not need to stress about any violation because I can assure you it will not be a problem. Leave this image aline and focus on other bigger things. Lastly, do not accuse people of copyright violation with no context, its disrespectful. RYLELT7 (talk) 05:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. @RYLELT7: File:Sachdev in 2018.jpg has not yet been deleted and per COM:EVID, it is incumbent on you to provide evidence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How do I upload the non-free images to Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Statisticsisfun (talk • contribs) 10:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Not a UD request. @Statisticsisfun: Please see COM:Fair use. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Addis Abeba12.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

Hi, this file (origial source) was deleted after this DR. However, I would argue the statue is not the primary focus of the photo, the case is of com:de minimis and the photo is a landscape photo.
Acagastya (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose The statue is the primary focus of the photograph and other copyrightable elements also exist in the photo (i.e. the buildings). The image falls under COM:DM case #6, and very unlikely can be considered de minimis. And there is no freedom of panorama in Ethiopia. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

The other buildings in the landscape are too simple, and the statue takes up very less portion of the photo. Now, that is how I see it. I could be wrong, and therefore, I hope for someone with fresh pair of eyeballs to have a look.
Acagastya (talk) 16:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

@Nat and Acagastya: In this case, I would love to request a temporary undeletion for 30 days, because we are really not sure if these buildings are indeed "too simple" or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: Temporary undeletion unnecessary as the photo exists elsewhere as mentioned in the request. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Oppose The sculpture takes up the center of the photograph and certainly exceeds de minimis. JGHowes ^talk 14:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done No consensus to undelete. Thuresson (talk) 19:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ron Mueck head.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Ron Mueck head.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: It was deleted by Magog the Ogre on 19 January 2021, 10:17:27 a.m. (Philippines Standard Time) because "Derivative work of non-free content". However, I stand firm that this should be fine per {{FoP-UK}} on the grounds that: it is a 3D artwork situated inside British Museum (publicly-accessible interiors) and that the British FoP is known to be broad. It is the same subject as that of File:'Mask ll' (2962794280).jpg, categorized under Category:Sculptures in the British Museum. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Support This appears to be covered by FoP. De728631 (talk) 12:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Freedom_of_panorama "The practical effect of the broad Freedom of Panorama provisions in the UK and in other countries with similar laws is that it is acceptable to upload to Commons not only photographs of public buildings and sculptures but also works of artistic craftsmanship which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public. " --GRuban (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Support for all the valid reasons cited above Dreamspy (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alarm im Schlossmuseum.jpg et al.

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

I can agree with the deletion of the following pictures:

   File:Ein Chirurg erinnert sich Logo.jpg
   File:Unternehmen Rentnerkommune Logo.jpg
   File:Kurklinik Rosenau Logo.jpg

I do not agree with the deletion of these pictures:

   File:Zwei Herzen zwoelf Pfoten.jpg
   File:Herzschlag Logo.jpg
   File:Tournee Ballett Logo.jpg
   File:Maenner sind was Wunderbares Logo.jpg
   File:Die Melchiors Logo.jpg
   File:Unsere heile Welt Logo.jpg
   File:Golden Zeiten Logo.jpg
   File:Jetzt erst recht Logo.jpg
   File:Kalle kocht Logo.jpg
   File:Typisch Mann Logo.jpg
   File:Alexander und die Toechter Logo.jpg
   File:Direktion City Logo.jpg
   File:Alarm im Schlossmuseum Logo.jpg
   File:Die Inselaerztin Logo.jpg

They only contain simple letters on a blurred background. Have the pictures really been checked one by one before deleting them all?

--Aguetul (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose I would say it is the blurred backgrounds that are problematic. They are still sufficiently visible to show parts of the original TV series screenplay. Apart from that they appear to be cut out of screenshots made by others, so that's another copyright infringement. Compare e.g. Die Melchiors or Zwei Herzen und zwölf Pfoten. Copyright aside, the upscaling in these two cases (and likely also at the other files) caused a really bad quality of the respective overall image, so there's another reason not to undelete them. De728631 (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The problem is on the one side: no copyrights shall be violated, and on the other side: the logo shall have any relation to the articles subject, not only a neutral letter string in front of a neutral background. A lot of logos supplied by other authors have to be deleted also, if the rules applied here are consequently applied everywhere. BTW: The quality of the pictures is good enough for its purposes (logo of a TV series). It would be nice to know the real reason for deletion. Up to now, I got a lot of recommendations how to make such an upload acceptable. Mostly it was recommended to keep the letters and to blur the background. What to do now to improve?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aguetul (talk • contribs) 15:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

--Aguetul (talk) 13:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The second deletion request contains a tip "make the background transparent". In my opinion this would work, because the distinctive text font of the logos will still link the logos to the TV series. The backgrounds are not needed at all. Compare also en:File:DallasLogo.jpg which was uploaded as fair use at the English Wikipedia instead of PD-textlogo as opposed to File:Star Trek DS9 logo.svg. De728631 (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:InSapphoWeTrust - Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts at Madame Tussauds London (8481389580).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Brad Pitt, Morgan Freeman (111434664).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BRANGELINA after split at Madame Tussauds London (30331204923).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:InSapphoWeTrust - Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts at Madame Tussauds London (8481389580).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: These three were deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Brad Pitt wax figures, on the grounds of having no FOP indoors (and also 3D wax figures). But there is one precedent (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wax figures of actors in the Madame Tussauds London) which can confirm that even such types of artistic works inside British public museums are fine per {{FoP-UK}}. And the FOP rules of both UK and Australia are very similar to each other! (Most 2D works not OK, exterior and interior architecture OK, permanent 3D works whether outdoors or public indoors OK). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Support COM:FOP UK states that works "which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public" are also covered by FoP. De728631 (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @JWilz12345 and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sebastian Höffner.gif

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Ich bin der Urheber des Gifs und Inhaber der zugrundeliegenden Videofiles. {{--Dettmero (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)|19:23, 20 January 2021|Dettmero}}

Oppose Dann brauchen wir bitte eine Freigabe per E-Mail (siehe COM:OTRS/de). Einfacher und schneller wäre es aber, auf Tenor.com eine freie Lizenz für den Film einzutragen. De728631 (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De867231. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nolan North Interview.gif

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Ich bin Urheber des GIFs und Inhaber der zugrundeliegenden Videofiles {{--Dettmero (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)|19:24, 20 January 2021|Dettmero}}

Oppose Dann brauchen wir bitte eine Freigabe per E-Mail (siehe COM:OTRS/de). Einfacher und schneller wäre es aber, auf Tenor.com eine freie Lizenz für den Film einzutragen. De728631 (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Concordia Britz beim Spiel auf dem Sportplatz am Buschkrug.gif

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Ich bin Urheber des GIFS und Inhaber der Quellvideodatei {{--Dettmero (talk) 19:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)|19:26, 20 January 2021|Dettmero}}

Oppose Dann brauchen wir bitte eine Freigabe per E-Mail (siehe COM:OTRS/de). Einfacher und schneller wäre es aber, auf Tenor.com eine freie Lizenz für den Film einzutragen. De728631 (talk) 01:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Recent uploads by User:PJakopin, part 2

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request:

the following photograph and diagram were uploaded by PJakopin after having been published on the website of Ljubljana Caving Society under a Commons-compatible license (which the society arranged with copyright owners). Uploads patrollers weren't satisfied and tagged them as missing permission, then they got deleted before the issue could be sorted. OTRS permissions are now archived for the following:

Diagram by Jože Pirnat, permission given by heirs, OTRS ticket 2021011910004393

File:Renejevo_brezno_and_P4_cave_profile_2017.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Photo by Jure Bevc, permission given by author himself, OTRS ticket 2021011910006481

File:In the Rombonka underground river canyon, at -900 m.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Please undelete. — Yerpo ^Eh? 15:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Yerpo: Please add the OTRS templates. --De728631 (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by Marc Lee

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore

We have a valid OTRS permission from the creator with Ticket:2021011810007025.

Thanks a lot, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Mussklprozz: Bitte setze die OTRS-Bausteine in die Bildbeschreibungen. --De728631 (talk) 01:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Francesc Gascó.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020072010009242 regarding File:Francesc Gascó.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Ganímedes: Please proceed. --De728631 (talk) 01:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: chile ruta 5 autopista jct svg a file chile ruta 5 autopista jct png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

freddie you can remove chile route 5 blue that measures 551 x 501 to 559 x 509 10 KB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicojaba2781 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Not a UD request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hugo Scheiber.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Hugo Scheiber.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Battarlin

Hugo Scheiber died in 1950. It should be public domain in the EU now. Abzeronow (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

I assume this was of a painting... what year was the painting from? Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

I have no way of being able to see the description so I have no clue. Abzeronow (talk) 19:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

It's a painting by Scheiber from the 1930s. There is no date mark by the artist himself on the picture but the uploader wrote this in the description, so potentially from after 1926. De728631 (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I suppose it may be a while before this particular painting can be restored. Abzeronow (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Chordate morphology (1962)

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(Above per original listing.) This work was first published in the U.S. in 1962, with a copyright notice. A publication of that sort would require a renewal, which did not occur; thus, this work is in the public domain in the U.S. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

Support per above. The copyright claim was made by Reinhold Publishing Corporation and would have required a renewal after 28 years. No such renewal has been recorded by the US Copyright Office. {{PD-US-not renewed}}. De728631 (talk) 03:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GameStick console.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Без описаний Artyom 5353539 (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. No rationale provided for undeletion. Per file description, an unambigious and admitted COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Victory gardeners' seed and plant guide - seed and plant requirements for a victory garden for a family of four (IA CAT10890830).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

There is no notice, and there was no timely registration; thus, this work is in the public domain in the U.S., where it was first published. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

Support This is {{PD-US-no notice}} - see PDF. De728631 (talk) 03:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Professional picture.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a picture about Serena Chiang, and I am Serena Chiang. I give permission for myself to use my own pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sere1212 (talk • contribs) 09:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: @Sere1212: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. For the possibility of undeletion, it require that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Serena Art picture.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a picture of myself, that I took. It is not plagiarism. Sere1212 (talk) 10:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: @Sere1212: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. For the possibility of undeletion, it require that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Brücke, Kunstzeitschrift, Kärnten.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Brücke, Kunstzeitschrift, Kärnten.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brücke, Kunstzeitschrift, Kärnten.jpg

Anton Kolig died in 1950 so his copyright has expired in the EU. Abzeronow (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose There is still the question when the painting was first published, so we can determine its copyright status in the US. Also, although it may seem trivial, this is not a faithful scan of the original image but the title page of a copyrighted magazine. De728631 (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

If the original work is the top right painting here https://www.leopoldmuseum.org/en/press/press-materials/928/Anton-Kolig or the top painting shown here https://worldofwonder.net/artdept-the-homoerotic-paintings-of-anton-kolig/, it's from 1923. But of course, the DW having its own copyright should be considered as well as you say. Thanks for the context though, the DR did not convey that the DW itself could be problematic. Abzeronow (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Головной экран программы СтаДиа.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Этот файл мой собственный, создан 10 лет назад, а 2 дня назад переписан с моего ПК в https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard AKU-47 (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose It's a screenshot of proprietary software. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per WIO. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

VINOD YOUNG .jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Vinod young — Preceding unsigned comment added by VINOD YOUNG (talk • contribs) 03:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close: no reason given. Please review our instrustions," particularly "State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion." (emphasis in original). --Эlcobbola _talk 14:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Игорь Аронович Бяльский.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Файл был мне предоставлен Бяльским Игорем Ароновичем и помещён по его личной просьбе. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Михаил Польский (talk • contribs) 04:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: The photographer's permission is heeded. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sony Bravia Android TV.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This photo has been captured by me. Kinldy undelete it so that I will upload new version of the file with screen turned off--Kskhh (talk) 07:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Nonsense request. Restoration is not necessary to "upload new version of the file with screen turned off." Deleted image is a COM:DW of TV GUI and title cards, etc. thereon. Эlcobbola _talk 17:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Toshiba Satellite L50T-A196.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is not a derivative work but my own work I have this laptop with me--Kskhh (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Nonsense request. This has nothing to do with ownership or possession of the laptop, but rather the image displayed thereon. Please review COM:DW; you are not the photographer of this image and thus cannot license its derivatives. Эlcobbola _talk 17:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Samsung Galaxy S9+ Black.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This photo has been captured by me I have not taken it from the internet. I have meta data also. Kindly undelete it --Kskhh (talk) 07:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Please review COM:DW. You are not the author of the GUI or of the background image and thus cannot license their derivatives. Эlcobbola _talk 17:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nissan X-Trail 2018.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

File is allowed for publications on information portals, which is stated on "Copyright info" page attached to the file bio. The given info is shown in Russian which is not a reason for file deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SsrKelso (talk • contribs) 16:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose That does not allow me to sell postcards with this photo. Thuresson (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Where, precisely, do you see a free license there? (You failed to provide a license with the upload.) How do you reconcile "Any reproduction, adaptation, translation and / or modification, both full and partial, as well as the use of materials on other websites, in violation of the above conditions is strictly prohibited" ("Любое воспроизведение, адаптация, перевод и/или модификация, как полные, так и частичные, а также использование материалов на иных веб-сайтах, в нарушение вышеприведенных условий строго воспрещается") with our requirement that derivatives be allowed? How do you reconcile "Any other use of these materials without Nissan's prior express written permission is strictly prohibited; this limitation applies, among other things, to the use of materials on advertising and amateur websites" ("Любое иное использование данных материалов без предварительного недвусмысленного письменного разрешения компании Nissan строго запрещено; данное ограничение относится, в том числе, к использованию материалов на рекламных и любительских веб-сайтах") with our requirement that content be useable anywhere for any purpose, including commercial (advertising)? Did you not read the linked policies in the notice you received? Эlcobbola _talk 16:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Someone's Here.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

it is an art and a tribute to the article sudetes, the drawing is clearly showing a mountain woman, it was destined for the mountains and the crisis of the sudetes, so in art the mountain is crying, is it clear?

~ ~ ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suuzam (talk • contribs) 03:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: not deleted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Someone's Here.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

it is an art and a tribute to the article sudetes, the drawing is clearly showing a mountain woman, it was destined for the mountains and the crisis of the sudetes, so in art the mountain is crying, is it clear?

~ ~ ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suuzam (talk • contribs) 03:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: not deleted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Advances in hybrid water-lubricated journal bearing for use in ocean vessels (IA advancesinhybrid1094541622).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

This is PD-USGov, and clearly so marked on the first page of the document. The copyright claim is illegitimate. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC).

The US government remark was added by the Calhoun library, but not by the original author. I'd rather not trust their assessment in this case because there is no evidence that the author worked for the US Navy or some affiliated department. De728631 (talk) 21:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

NPS Calhoun is a U.S. government entity; if you have any reason to doubt that determination, mention it; but without a demonstrated pattern of copyright-license abuse generally, or a specific finding that the license applied to this work is incorrect specifically, I trust in the judgment given. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC).
- I have assessed a lot of these mass uploads from the NPS library. They include works that were not even written at the NPS and where the author had no clear affiliation with the US Navy or military in general. The page in question where the Calhoun library mentions the US Government work seems to me more like a boilerplate template than a genuine copyright evaluation on their side. Per our precautionary principle we need to be wary in such cases rather than blindly trusting the authorities. De728631 (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
  - The mark is not indiscriminately applied, at the very least; the institution generally eithers mentions valid copyright, does not mention copyright, or declares the work in the public domain, on account of it being a work of the U.S. government. This work was written at the NPS. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC).

Oppose - This is a thesis by Brian Douglas Heberley submitted as a coursework requirement for Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering at MIT. There is no evidence that a) Heberley was a contemporaneous employee of the federal government or b) that the document was created as part of official federal duties. Both must be true for PD-USGov to apply. The notion that writing a Ph. D. thesis would be an official federal duty is novel, and thus would require evidence very much better than mechanically (indiscriminately) applied boilerplate; indeed, COM:EVID requires "appropriate evidence," which is not on offer. Nominator, notably omits mention of clear "©2013 Brian Douglas Heberley. All rights reserved" notice on page 1 (!!!). Эlcobbola _talk 14:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola and De867231. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A Design Tool For The Evaluation Of Atmosphere Independent Propulsion In Submarines (IA adesigntoolforth1094542961).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

This is PD-USGov, and clearly so marked on the first page of the document. The copyright claim is illegitimate. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC).

The US government remark was added by the Calhoun library, but not by the original author. I'd rather not trust their assessment in this case because there is no evidence that the author worked for the US Navy or some affiliated department. De728631 (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

NPS Calhoun is a U.S. government entity; if you have any reason to doubt that determination, mention it; but without a demonstrated pattern of copyright-license abuse generally, or a specific finding that the license applied to this work is incorrect specifically, I trust in the judgment given. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC).

I have assessed a lot of these mass uploads from the NPS library. They include works that were not even written at the NPS and where the author had no clear affiliation with the US Navy or military in general. The page in question where the Calhoun library mentions the US Government work seems to me more like a boilerplate template than a genuine copyright evaluation on their side. Per our precautionary principle we need to be wary in such cases rather than blindly trusting the authorities.

- - The mark is not indiscriminately applied, at the very least; the institution generally eithers mentions valid copyright, does not mention copyright, or declares the work in the public domain, on account of it being a work of the U.S. government. This work was written at the NPS. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC).

Oppose - This is a thesis by Grant B. Thomton submitted as a coursework requirement for Master of Science decree at MIT. There is no evidence that a) Thomton was a contemporaneous employee of the federal government or b) that the document was created as part of official federal duties. Both must be true for PD-USGov to apply. The notion that writing a masters thesis would be an official federal duty is novel, and thus would require evidence very much better than mechanically (indiscriminately) applied boilerplate; indeed, COM:EVID requires "appropriate evidence," which is not on offer. Nominator, notably omits mention of clear "Copyright © 1994 Grant B. Thornton" notice on page 1 (!). Эlcobbola _talk 14:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola and De867231. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A Design Comparison between IPv4 and IPv6 in the Context of MYSEA, and Implementation of an IPv6 MYS. (IA adesigncompariso109459860).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

ShakespeareFan00: What part of this has third-party copyright? The work, as far as I can see, is PD-USGov, and I don’t see any figures off-hand that are under third-party copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC).

In the appendix there are 15 pages of computer code that is "Copyright (C) 1997 and 1998 WIDE Project." This seems a bit much for de minimis, so I don't think blanking these pages could save the PD document. De728631 (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I see this now. That text is certainly not acceptable. However, the appendix is only mentioned once, and does not appear to be an integral part of the work as a whole; as such, I believe the source code may be removed from an uploaded version of the document without substantial loss. I have not claimed that any copyright of third-party copyright claims could be dismissed by way of de minimis. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC).

No, you didn't mention de minimis but that would be the usual argument to keep such works. But since it won't work here, I brought this up. De728631 (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - As per my comments in the other inadequate requests, there is no evidence that this was authored by a federal employee in the performance of their duties and ample suggestion that the NPS boilerplate is unreliable and effectively license laundering. Эlcobbola _talk 17:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A defense-in-depth approach to phishing (IA adefenseindepthp109452667).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The work itself is PD-USGov, and may be read here. Starting on p. 51, there are a number of images, to which third-party copyright may apply. However, a number of them, or large portions of them, appear to have been manufactured by the author, and would therefore not be under copyright. Some discussion will be needed to fully determine what images will need to redacted, so that this work may be properly uploaded. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC).

Oppose - Notwithstanding there is no evidence that this was authored by a federal employee in the performance of their duties, like the other inadequate requests, this is derivative of the Internet Explorer GUI; the PayPal website (pages 20,22,23,24,53,54,55); the RNCBANK website (pages 29,57); the ibsnetacess website (pages 30,58); the Amazon website (pages 60,61); and the Chase website (page 64). Even if this were a federal work, the federal government can use the works of others under fair use like any other other entity; such use does not dissolve the underline copyright. Эlcobbola _talk 17:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A decision making process for movement planning. (IA adecisionmakingp1094540083).pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

This is PD-USGov, and clearly so marked on the first page of the document. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC).

Again, I wouldn't put too much weight into the assessment of the Calhoun library who added the US government remark. De728631 (talk) 21:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

NPS Calhoun is a U.S. government entity; if you have any reason to doubt that determination, mention it; but without a demonstrated pattern of copyright-license abuse generally, or a specific finding that the license applied to this work is incorrect specifically, I trust in the judgment given. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC).

I have assessed a lot of these mass uploads from the NPS library. They include works that were not even written at the NPS and where the author had no clear affiliation with the US Navy or military in general. The page in question where the Calhoun library mentions the US Government work seems to me more like a boilerplate template than a genuine copyright evaluation on their side. Per our precautionary principle we need to be wary in such cases rather than blindly trusting the authorities. De728631 (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

- - The mark is not indiscriminately applied, at the very least; the institution generally eithers mentions valid copyright, does not mention copyright, or declares the work in the public domain, on account of it being a work of the U.S. government. This work was written at the NPS. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC).

Oppose - This is a thesis by Thomas Joyce Regan, Jr. submitted as a coursework requirement for a M.S.C.E. degree at MIT. There is no evidence that a) Regan was a contemporaneous employee of the federal government or b) that the document was created as part of official federal duties. Both must be true for PD-USGov to apply. The notion that writing a masters thesis would be an official federal duty is novel, and thus would require evidence very much better than mechanically (indiscriminately) applied boilerplate; indeed, COM:EVID requires "appropriate evidence," which is not on offer. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola _talk 14:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola and De867231. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files received from "Nour House" via OTRS

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, requesting deletion of the following files. They have been deleted by various administrators, as "OTRS permission was not received" - however, appropriate release statements for all the files are available at Template:OTRS ticket. From my observation, several emails (and tickets) have been merged into one ticket, and thread has been closed after updating files from one email only. As a result, no one knew about others. I have checked the all the files, and will be able to add OTRS permission asap after undeletion.

Thanks, KCVelaga (talk · mail) 14:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Restored, please add the OTRS permission. --rimshot^talk 00:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stefan Kutzenberger (2019).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The picture in question is the official author portrait of Stefan Kutzenberger, it can be downloaded for free from the website of his editor and is free of any copyright requests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apolinaris Grammophon (talk • contribs) 15:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose That is simply not true. From piper.de: "Honorarfreie Verwendung ausschließlich im Kontext zu den in der Piper Verlag GmbH erschienenen Büchern des Autors. (Buchbesprechungen, Interviews, Veranstaltungsankündigungen … ) Zur Verwendung in Zusammenhang mit von Dritten veröffentlichten Lizenzprodukten wenden Sie sich bitte an den Verlag. Bitte geben Sie immer das vollständige Copyright an: Foto: © EK / Piper Verlag". Thuresson (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Masahiko Kimura and Nori Bunasawa.jpg - A photo taken from my Camera

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Masahiko Kimura and Nori Bunasawa.jpg is a photo from my personal collection. It was taken using my camera and I am myself in this photo. I allowed it to be published in the novel I co-authored: The Toughest Man Alive. The link that the user -akko reported from the Russian website used my photo without my permission. Please advise me on the steps I should take to get this photo undeleted.

--110347nbtough (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Nori Bunasawa

Not done: @110347nbtough: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. For the possibility of undeletion, it require that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vinodyoung.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File undelete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinodrtzzz (talk • contribs) 11:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Sock nonsense. --Эlcobbola _talk 14:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rishab Jain Inventor 2020.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I request this file to be undeleted.

I took this photo of Rishab Jain. I have full rights of it.
The "Facebook" page where the image was detected was created after I took this original photo. They are infringing on my copyright, not the other way around.

Thus, I own the rights to the image, and uploaded it. The Facebook page where the image was detected used the image that I took. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.39.96.24 (talk) 02:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@Pogchampion20204: Please login. I assume File:RishabJainPhotograph2018.jpg is the same as this one, am I right? Do you mind if you upload the full resolution of the photo and include complete EXIF data from the camera? Thanks, panda kekok 9 03:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)]

@Pandakekok9: Hello there, thank you very much. That would be great; and yes, the full resolution of the image would be better. Appreciate it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pogchampion20204 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Image recreated as File:RishabJainPhotograph2018.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Military Map Symbols

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

I would like to reverse several deletions done on 13 Jan. The deleted files were duplicates, but they were accidentally duplicate. The files that were retained (found at end of redirect for most of the below) are wrong, and I am slowly uploading corrections.

CdnMCG (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

As follow-up, the accidental duplicates have all been corrected. They now look as they were intended and do not match the deleted files. CdnMCG (talk) 03:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: Restored as per User_talk:JuTa#UnDelete_Request. CdnMCG (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coastal photo from Nantian Observation Platform, taken by t981130.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

On 9 January, I received an email from t981130 informing me that he has emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined that received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coastal photo from Dawu Sea View Trail, taken by t981130.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

On 9 January, I received an email from t981130 informing me that he has emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined that received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Colder Places.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am the content owner. I permit this image to be used on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imperium89 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Imperium89: As a purely technical matter, we have no means to confirm your claims or assertions on this platform. Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the creator of the work, unless the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by contract) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geetanjali as Radha.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This being original work, request un-deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Go4navy (talk • contribs) 17:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. Эlcobbola _talk 20:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:Dragon Quest III - Comparação dos Gráficos Comparação dos Gráficos das versões do Nes, Super Nintendo e Game Boy Color. Herói fora de Aliahan.
File:Dragon Quest III - Templo Dhama Na foto, O jogador escolhe uma nova classe para o personagem. Este é o principal sistema que teria nos futuros jogos de Dragon Quest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryugold (talk • contribs) 07:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ryugold: After your block expires, please explain, why the images are under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. English Wikipedia states that they are not free. Ankry (talk) 13:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done requester is blocked and they cannot respond to questions in 24 hours as expected. Ankry (talk) 13:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:STAHL Band 1998.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021010510004669 regarding File:STAHL Band 1998.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hands and First House 1963.jpg and 49 other jpg files

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello,

I missed the nomination of deletion and could not participate in the discussion. However, as soon as I noticed the issue on these photos, I corrected their licenses on 21 January 2021 just before they were deleted on 22 January. --Bineshgardi (talk) 01:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

   File:Phoebe-Apperson-Hearst.jpg

And also:

   File:رابرت ترنر - یکی از حواریون عبدالبهاء.jpg
   File:آقا بزرگ خراسانی ملقب به بدیع.jpg
   File:نبیل زرندی.jpg
   File:Hermann Grossmann (1899-1968).webp
   File:William Sutherland Maxwell (1874-1952).webp
   File:William Sears (1911-1992).webp
   File:Valíyu’lláh Varqá (1884-1955).webp
   File:Ugo Giachery (1896-1989).webp
   File:Taráz’u’lláh Samandarí (1874-1968).webp
   File:Siyyid Mustafá Rúmí (d. 1942).webp
   File:Siegfried Schopflocher (1877-1953).webp
   File:Shu’á’u’lláh `Alá’í (1889-1984).webp
   File:Roy C. Wilhelm (1875-1951).webp
   File:Rahmatu’lláh Muhájir (1923-1979).webp
   File:Paul Edmond Haney (1909-1982).webp
   File:Músá Banání (1886-1971).webp
   File:Mullá Muḥammad-Riḍáy-i-Muḥammad Ábádí, known as Jináb-i-Shaykh Muḥammad-Riḍáy-i-Yazdí.webp
   File:Mulla Muhammad-i-Qa’ini, known as Nabíl-i-Akbar (1829-1892).webp
   File:Muhammed Taqiy-i-Isfahani (d. 1946).webp
   File:Mirza ‘Alí-Muhammad Varqá, the father of Rúhu’lláh (d. 1896).webp
   File:Mírzá `Ali-Muhammad, known as Ibn-i-Asdaq, (d. 1928).webp
   File:Martha Root (1872-1939).webp
   File:Louis George Gregory (1874-1951).webp
   File:Leroy C. Ioas (1896-1965).webp
   File:Keith Ransom-Kehler (1876-1933).webp
   File:John Henry Hyde-Dunn (1855-1941).webp
   File:John Graham Ferraby (1914-1973).webp
   File:John Ebenezer Esslemont (1874-1925).webp
   File:John Aldham Robarts (1901-1991).webp
   File:Jalál Kházeh, also transliterated as Jalál Kháḍih (1897-1990).webp
   File:Horace Hotchkiss Holley (1887-1960).webp
   File:Hasan Muvaqqar Balyúzí (1908-1980).webp
   File:Harold Collis Featherstone (1913-1990).webp
   File:Hají Mullá `Alí-Akbar, known as Hají Ákhúnd,(1842-1910).webp
   File:Hájí Mírzá Muhammad-Taqí, known as Ibn-i-Abhar (d. 1917).webp
   File:Hají Mírzá Hasan-i-Adíb (1848-1919).webp
   File:Hájí Abu’l-Hasan-i-Ardikání, known as Hájí Amín (1831-1928).webp
   File:George Townshend (1876-1957).webp
   File:Enoch Olinga (1926-1979).webp
   File:Dorothy Beecher Baker (1898-1954).webp
   File:Dhikru’lláh Khádim (1904-1986).webp
   File:Corinne Knight True (1861-1961).webp
   File:Clara Dunn (1869-1960).webp
   File:Amelia Engelder Collins (1873-1962).webp
   File:Amatu’l-Bahá Rúhíyyih Khánum (1910-2000).webp
   File:Agnes Baldwin Alexander (1875-1971).webp
   File:Adelbert Mühlschlegel (1897-1980).webp
   File:‘Abdu’l-Jalíl Bey Sa‘ad (d. 1942).webp
   File:Abu’l-Qásim Faizi (1906-1980).webp
   File:`Alí-Muhammad Varqá (1911-2007).webp
   File:`Alí-Akbar Furútan (1905-2003).webp
   File:Hands and First House 1963.jpg
   File:ایادیان امرالله و اولین هیئت انتخابی بیت العدل اعظم در نزدیکی مرقد بهاءالله.jpg

Oppose Deleted after a deletion request. The claimed Creative commons license appear to be incorrextly added by uploader. The source seems to be bahai.org whose terms of use include:

The Content may not be used in a way that misrepresents the intent of the original source.
Any use for a commercial purpose requires permission prior to use.
The Bahá’í International Community reserves the right to withdraw permission to use the Content at any time and for any use. In such circumstances, the use of the Content should cease immediately.

Thuresson (talk) 09:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Accidentally deleted automobile photos from Flickr

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Please restore the following files:

Done: The files was deleted per "out of scope" and I checked a few of them and they were not listed in the DR. So I sucpect that deleting admin just deleted all files. --MGA73 (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Supplementing comment: 3 were possibly COM:DW so I nominated them for deletion. --MGA73 (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Judge Bianchini, Courts-Martial Judge, Camp Pendleton, CA - Oct1985.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Judge Bianchini has a license from the San Diego Union Tribune to use the photo on Wikipedia as follows:

The San Diego Union-Tribune has granted Victor Bianchini a license to display this photograph. Their message to Judge Bianchini stated as follows: From: Monteagudo, Merrie merrie.monteagudo@sduniontribune.com Subject: RE: Permission to Use a Photo for use in a Wikipedia Page Date: December 30, 2020 at 12:42 PM To: Victor Bianchini judgebianchini@att.net Cc: Light, Jeff jeff.light@sduniontribune.com Hello Vic, I have been authorized to issue the following legal release. I hereby affirm that I represent The San Diego Union-Tribune, LLC, the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached image of Col. Vic Bianchini (c) 1986 San Diego Union-Tribune I agree to grant Victor Bianchini a non-exclusive, limited license to display the photograph for non-commercial use on his Wikipedia page. Merrie Monteagudo Research Manager, The San Diego Union-Tribune, LLC. December 30, 2020 Best, Merrie Monteagudo | Research Manager O: 619-718-5431 merrie.monteagudo@sduniontribune.com 600 B Street, Suite 1201, San Diego, California 92101

Please reinstate the photo.

Dated 1-24-2021. --JudgeDredd83 (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Notwithstanding that you'd claimed yourself to be the author, which you now implicitly acknowledge to have been a lie, we preclude permission applicable only to Wikipedia and require commercial usage ("I agree to grant [...] limited license to display the photograph for non-commercial use on his Wikipedia page"). These requirements are indeed communicated by the guidance linked in the three notices you'd received prior to making this request. Эlcobbola _talk 22:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:42941-helvick-head-b-class-atlantic-85-lifeboat-NICHOLAS-LEACH-16x9.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

== [[:42941-helvick-head-b-class-atlantic-85-lifeboat-NICHOLAS-LEACH-16x9] ==

HI, please undelete this image as it credits the author and website throughout which is in line with the image copywrite statement. of the image when you confirm downloading the image. SHANNON13ALB (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. @SHANNON13ALB: No evidence of an accepted free licence at source. Fair use is not permitted on Commons -- non-free content under a fair use rationale is subject to immediate deletion without notice. Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Dyrhólaviti

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Dyrholaey lighthouse (15643496592).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Dyrhólaey - panoramio (3).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 135.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 136.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 137.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 146.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Lighthouse Dyrhólaey.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Dyrhólaviti

Architect copyright has expired in Iceland since he died in 1950 Abzeronow (talk) 00:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As I explained in my request for undeletion, unfortunately I had no chance to discuss the matter because I came upon the notice on January 21. However, as soon as I noticed the request for deletion notification, I realized the need for correction of licensing therefore updated the licensing code for every one of the files above. I am sorry to see that all the files were deleted the day after I had updated them. Kindly reconsider the matter and have them undeleted. Thank you.Bineshgardi (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

File:A.Zecchini by Mauro Del Papa.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Also:

Hello Dears,

This pictures is mine and my boyfriend took it!

It's free from any copyrights.

Please help me to show it.

Best regards

--Aleeeap (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Aleeeap: Then, the author is your boyfriend, not you and we need his written free license permission in order to restore the photos. See COM:OTRS for details. Photos become free of copyright 50-70 years after the photographer death (depending on legal system). Ankry (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Atomium - The iconic building in Brussels.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Atomium - The iconic building in Brussels.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: if this was speedily deleted due to copyvio as a derivative work (because Belgium had no FOP back then) and an original photo by Dudva (not taken from other websites or the like), then this can be restored per {{FoP-Belgium}} (since July 2016). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: The deletion rationale was "Marking as possible copyvio because Protected building and no freedom-of-panorama in Belgium" which is now moot. --De728631 (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

House of Ho file to undelete

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I am the assistant for Wallin Chambers Entertainment, the production company that produced the show "House of Ho" for HBO Max of which relates to the content of this file.

I was asked by my bosses, Katy Wallin and Stephanie Bloch Chambers to upload something regarding House of Ho to get it on Wikipedia. I was green lite by Merdith Tiger, the publicity manager for HBO Max | TNT, TBS & truTV| WarnerMedia Entertainment to send this file in.

This is the first time I have ever had to do anything like this and I'm confused by this process.

What do I need to do to make this happen?

--Wallin Chambers Entertainment (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Natalie Frerkimg (1/25/2021)

Not done: Procedural close. User will be unable to respond as they have been blocked. @Wallin Chambers Entertainment: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edvard Eikill.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is a picture taken by Anders Kvåle Rue, who has given me permission to use this picture on the article about Edvard Eikill on Wikipedia. I published it in good faith and still I don't know why I can't use it.

--Funkydiscopops (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - You claimed yourself to be the author, which you now implicitly acknowledge to have been a falsehood. That claim was also a breach of the purported self(sic)/cc-by-sa-4.0 license (the "by" meaning attribution is required.) Previously published images require COM:OTRS permission directly from the actual rightsholder. Эlcobbola _talk 19:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TOALA2.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello I hereby strongly ask to repair the TOALA2.jpg file ... I'm creating the biography of Toalá Carolina Petricelli, Writer of several books in Brazil. So... the photo is mine, taken by me and also edited to lighten the background of the image. I'm a curator of Toalá Petricelli who, due to the greater strengths of destiny, is also my wife. Thanks Luciano Petricelli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petricelli (talk • contribs) 20:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. Эlcobbola _talk 20:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola @Petricelli: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nesting gifting littering (precious things).mpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I am requesting the undeletion of this file, as I unfortunately did not take the chance to debate its request for deletion. I am making a case for this video file's place in the Wikimedia commons, because it demonstrates a process of experiential learning, and has a directly pedagogical component. This video was created with the specific intent of instigating an active learning experience for the people who find it. It was made with the knowledge that it would be uploaded to the Commons, and with a desire engage others in a collective creative process. after all, learning is a creative process. There is not one "knowledge" (singular) - rather, there are "knowledges" (plural). This contribution to the Commons aims to engage others through the knowledges of animism, meditation, prayer, and magic (spellwork) and actively asks the viewer/reader/listener to take action in their lives through these media. "Art" is not for individual expression for passive reception of an audience, nor is "science" objective and value-free. I would hope that today, we do not place such hard lines between the disciplines of science and art. The Wikimedia Commons seems to be a site to navigate and re-define those boundaries. --Mmuudddd (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Info Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mmuudddd seems to be the DR in question. Pinging @EugeneZelenko, Minorax for comment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't see anything educational in these media files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Neither do I. De728631 (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: no consensus for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:wetlook 1.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

это мое фото — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.22.206.36 (talk) 20:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. @Anri Breton: No evidence of an accepted free licence at source. Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Seshadri Swamigal Journey

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The file was created by me ON google maps. I printed it as an image and uploaded it. How is it a copyright violation? If you don't pay people, you get morons who delete images as a way of killing time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moolaramovijayathe (talk • contribs) 01:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This language of yours may get you blocked if you continue like that. There were no morons involved in deleting this upload. Please read COM:Derivative works. Even if you created it yourself on Google Maps, the underlying map is copyrighted to Google and you are not allowed to republish it without permission. De728631 (talk) 03:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Belgin Doruk.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

When this picture of mine was presented to DR I did not have a chance to object.(For lack of time or disposition, for lack of knowledge and experience, I do not remember, time ago.) It is about a memorial in a park. There is total FoP in Turkey for open areas. OTOH, someone made a crop of the original image to create a profile pic for the actress Belgin Doruk and -I think- that caused the deletion of both. Indeed her presence within the file was de minimus and the FoP rules in Turkey make it totally free. Please revive my file. I do not want the crop. (Note: Also remember the now-banned then-admin's style of fastly deleting anything in case no-one objected within the week. That is a side note though.) Thanks in advance for returning me a pic which I cannot even find in my personal archives. I think this is also the first time I ask for something here. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 02:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Support This image shows a poster in a metal frame located in a park, so FoP applies. None of the uploads of this particular image ever contained a cropped version. De728631 (talk) 03:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Kate Gallego Photo

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, I own this photo and work with Kate Gallego. It keeps getting deleted even though the photo is my own. Why does it keep getting deleted, and if there is something I can do to prevent it from being taken down again, that would be great.

(EthanF7164 (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC))

File:Kate Gallego 1010.jpg and File:Mayor Kate Gallego Photo.jpg are the same image. File:Phoenix Mayor, Kate Gallego.jpg is slightly larger though but is the same portrait. The problem with those is that they can be found elsewhere online without a free licence and apparently you did not send in a verification by email as requested on your talk page. If you are the original photographer, please send an email as explained in COM:OTRS to verify your authorship. If you are not the original photgrapher, please note that owning a copy of a photograph does not put you into a position to grant free licences for it, since copyright is usually held by the photographer. De728631 (talk) 03:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @EthanF7164: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tsar Nicholas II & King George V.JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Appears to have been deleted because of a confusion between the photographer Ernst Sandau (1880–1918) and his son, who had the same name. Another version of the image (File:George_V_and_Nicholas_II_in_Berlin,_1913.jpg) is available, but has different coloration. Wikiacc (talk) 03:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Support It was deleted because of en:File:Tsar Nicholas II & King George V.JPG which is now flagged for transfer to Commons though. We should undelete this one and transfer the enwiki upload. Works by Ernst Sandau Sr. are out of copyright in the country of origin and such promotional portraits were obviously published right after being created, so PD-US too. De728631 (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion of Logos

Latest comment: 3 years ago16 comments4 people in discussion

OTRS agent (verify): request: Regarding

JuTa has deleted these files as "no permission" and "no license". A Wikipedia in Spanish user has claimed (and another users have supported) the undeletion since

"All the files were {{PD-textlogo}}, and fall under the TOO.
All these files survived a Deletion request as "Kept".

Please verify this information and undelet, if necessary. Thanks a lot. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Undeleted for discussion. Some images are CC-licensed, which is incorrect if they are PD-textlogo, most are declared to be {{Own}}, which would warrant them Out of scope status if correct (we do not host personally created logos). Also fixed ping to deleting admin. Ankry (talk) 17:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Noting that the mentioned DR was about scope, not about copyright, so irrelevant here. Ankry (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment Some were in use when deletion, and they belongs to the National Television of Chile, so it's not "Own work" and they're perfectly in scope. Wrong license or wrong attribution are easy to solve; files don't need to be deleted if logos are PD-texlogo, and usefull. Thanks for undelete to re-evaluate the case. --Ganímedes (talk) 18:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to check images within the subcats Category:Media without a source and Category:Media missing permission and fix such cases before they get eligable for deletion. --Ju Ta 20:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll try. If other people (including yourself) can be involved in that before to delete the files, could be more effective. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 06:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

For the U.S. side of things... would have to agree they are PD-textlogo, with the probable exception of File:Logotipo del Canal 9 de Televisión de la Universidad de Chile 1970-1973.jpg. A little hard to tell, but the placement of the surrounding boxes, and possibly their changing textures and widths, may qualify that one for U.S. copyright. Less idea about South American TOO. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Now, this, is something I don't understand. I've fixed the source and now added the right license. So, is there any other problem?? --Ganímedes (talk) 22:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

I've corrected another license and I've reverted again. Can I proceed with the files or not? --Ganímedes (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: FYI the files (temp) restored here still not fixed and are still wearing some problem tags. They will get up to speedy deletion again in a few days. --Ju Ta 09:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

PS: You need to add a valid source (not {{Own}}) and author as well. --Ju Ta 09:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

@JuTa: when I' ve tried to fix them someone undo it (including yourself). Can I proceed Yes or Not? --Ganímedes (talk) 12:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Ganímedes: Yes --Ju Ta 15:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Ganímedes: I now removed the problem tags for those which are fixed OK. But there are still several which needs still a valid source and author. I marked the with - still not OK - above. --Ju Ta 21:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Ju JuTa: One more finished. I didn't find yesterday sources for the rest. Later I'll try to find them. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Done: most are back, some got redelted due to lacking sources. --Ju Ta 05:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Towner Keeney Webster.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This is a photograph of a photograph of my Great Grandfather, Towner K. Webster. It was probably taken around 1920. He died in 1922.

It has been in a family collection of photographs ever since. These are in my sole possession. No one else owns any rights to it. I chose to use it when I created an entry for him in Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towner_K._Webster

I thought I had given permission for its use under the creative commons license. Can you undelete it? @Garrison Point: 20:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrison Point (talk • contribs) 20:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

@Garrison Point: Question Being related to the subject or having possession of the physical copy of an image does not mean that one is the copyright holder of the work in question. Please advise who is the photographer, in which country it was taken, when it was first published (n.b. not the date of creaiton), and why which mean did you become the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Nat,

I researched the Moffett signature at the bottom of the photo. I'm 99% sure it is the Moffett Studio of Chicago, active in the 1910s and 1920s. Although some of their portraits are archived in the Chicago Historical Society, a search of several Chicago archives shows no image of my Great Grandfather. As I noted, T.K. Webster died in 1922, so I guess it was taken in 1920. In any event it's over 100 years old. It's my understanding that anything published before 1923 is public domain (assuming he even gave them rights to his image in the first place, which I would doubt). Can I assert a CC license? I will note Moffett Studio in a caption if you advise. Can we undelete this image? @Garrison Point: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrison Point (talk • contribs) 20:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@Garrison Point: Per COM:United States, when a work enters public domain is almost entirely dependent on when it was published in most cases. Creation ≠ publication. For example, if the work remained unpublished before 2002 and is a corporate creation, it remains under copyright protection from its creation for a 120 years. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Nat, There is no evidence this was ever published. It was a portrait done by a studio for the family and has been nothing more for over 100 years. Can you undelete it? If not, why not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrison Point (talk • contribs) 17:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrison Point (talk • contribs) 23:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

@Garrison Point: If there is no evidence of publication, then the work remains protected by copyright for a period of a 120 years after its creation, and, therefore, cannot be undeleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence of publication before 2003, possible undeletion in 2041, unless author becomes known and it is not a corporate creation, which may result in an earlier PD/undeletion date if the date of death of the author becomes known. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YurisNight 300x250.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Hi. I'm an admin on en: so I have a reasonable grasp of the copyright implications of Wikipedia. As member at the time of the Yuri's Night global organizing team, quite some time ago I uploaded the logo here so that it could be used in the various wikis. It was then deleted apparently because it matched an image from the internet, which is a wildly overzealous level of copyright enforcement. What do I need to do to bring it back? Thanks! Brockert (talk) 16:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Brockert: I think we need a permission send to COM:OTRS. Is that possible? --MGA73 (talk) 18:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose - This is merely a cartoon rendering (a derivative work) of this image, which Getty appears to believe is rights managed. Whatever the status of the cartoon, it does not dissolve the copyright of the underlying work. If Getty is mistaken, burden is on uploader or those seeking retention to demonstrate base image is free per COM:EVID. That isn't on offer here, indeed little more than argumentum ab auctoritate is. Эlcobbola _talk 15:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Accidentally deleted automobile photos from Flickr

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

First batch:

Second batch:

This is a continuation of previous batch of already undeleted files. Allo002 (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Allo002: Please state again why they should be undeleted. We get so many request here that we cannot easily remember any "previous batch". De728631 (talk) 03:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: (I closed the mentioned batch yesterday.) The files was deleted per "out of scope" and I checked a few of them and they were not listed in the DR. So I sucpect that deleting admin just deleted all files. --MGA73 (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stefani Keogh Singer.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Hello, This is a photograph which I took myself, of myself and wish to upload. This photograph does already appear on my personal website but this is still my property and I own the rights to share and distribute this image. Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefani Keogh (talk • contribs) 17:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose No evidence of a free licence at source. Does not appear to be self-photographed. @Stefani Keogh: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Previously published works require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose - Per Nat. Previously published with no free license, and self-authorship claim is not credible. Эlcobbola _talk 19:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Laurentiu BUGEAC.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The photo that has been deleted and for which I am requesting undeletion was taken from pactpentrugalati.ro website and is not protected by copyright. --Janagrosu (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. No evidence of an accepted free licence at source. @Janagrosu: Unless exempted by law or case law or protection has expired, all works are copyrighted. Per Romania's copyright rules, works are protected during the lifetime of the author plus 70 years after their death. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Diana Syrse Copyright Astrid Ackermann 7.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, We have the rights from Astrid Ackermann to use this photo. We do not understand why this photo was deleted, we do not know the person who deleted it ("FITINDIA"). The request comes from the person cocearned by the page and photo "Diana Syrse". Please help us with this. Best regards, Omcita --Omcita (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Omcita and Hellfar: Per the instructions left on Hellfar's talk page, for the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Diana Syrse Copyright Astrid Ackermann 2.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, We have the rights from Astrid Ackermann to use this photo. We do not understand why this photo was deleted, we do not know the person who deleted it ("FITINDIA"). The request comes from the person cocearned by the page and photo "Diana Syrse". Please help us with this. Best regards, Omcita --Omcita (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Omcita and Hellfar: Per the instructions left on Hellfar's talk page, for the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Миногарова.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Миногарова.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: We have recieved an email requesting to publish this image under the appropriate license. I request undeletion to be able to verify that this image actually belongs to the author of said email. ticket:2021012210006974 Skmp (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Skmp: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpgSahara Marie

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page should not be deleted. It is not spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martymcflys (talk • contribs) 01:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. File:Sahara marie .jpg has not been deleted as of 01:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC). @Martymcflys: If you disagree with the speedy deletion tagging of the file, please follow the instructions as mentioned on the tag. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Statue of Liberty (Mytilene)

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Liberty Statue.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Mytilini - Statue of Liberty.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Statue mytilene.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Statue of liberty in mytilene.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Liberty (Mytilene)

Copyright of Γρηγόριος Ζευγώλης, who died in 1950 has expired. Abzeronow (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Support The copyright has expired in Greece and the statue itself was erected in 1922, so also PD-US-expired. De728631 (talk) 04:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Abzeronow and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Teodoro Esteban López Calderón.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Almirante General D.Teodoro Esteban López Calderón, Almirante Jefe de Estado Mayor de la Armada. -ARMADA ESPAÑOLA- Fotógrafo Manuel Benítez Cillán. La imagen es de uso público realizada por Armada Española. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lopnax (talk • contribs) 13:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence of an accepted free licence at source. -ND and -NC licences are not permitted on Commons. @Lopnax: FYI: Please read COM:L. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kolkata Metro Rail Corporation Logo.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Kolkata Metro Rail Corporation Logo.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: below COM:TOO India and COM:TOO US AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @AntiCompositeNumber: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Charo Urbano.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Charo Urbano.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: The author of the photograph gives his acceptance for publication on Wikimedia under CC-BY-SA AlvaroQ1 (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @AlvaroQ1: For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder sent permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:趙祥誠.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

https://www.instagram.com/p/CIaqBgxFa1D/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

--Nickyjai (talk) 00:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion and nothing to be accomplished here. @Nickyjai: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Farrukh Makhmudov1

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is photo was taken by our company, why are you deleting it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tilessova (talk • contribs) 04:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Tilessova: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BUMARPoster.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is the promotional poster of a Disney+ movie. It needs to remain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BIA English (talk • contribs) 09:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@BIA English: , please read "Commons:Licensing", you might want to upload the image locally to Wikipedia or ask Disney for permission through the OTRS (which they are unlikely to give, but I encourage you to try). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. File is an unambigious copyvio and is non-free content. Fair use is not permitted on Commons, and non-free files under a fair use rationale is subject to immediate deletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marfan_wrist.tiff

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It is in this article which is publish under "open access" https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6831-13-59

The open access policy for this journal is defined here https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/about?gclid=CjwKCAiAu8SABhAxEiwAsodSZNXxCkU79EdS6CP5QSbRgkDaXpAGU2JxTp5hMSr5an4obTNb0RHkKhoCG34QAvD_BwE

And per here it is CC BY https://www.biomedcentral.com/about/policies/license-agreement

One also sees CC BY listed from here https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult?img=PMC3816571_1472-6831-13-59-1&query=Marfan%20syndrome&it=xg&lic=by&req=4&npos=18

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Here is the of the pdf of the paper with the permission / license clearly marked.[file:///home/chronos/u-b7b24e4634b1df58690130e98381a09d9543a39c/MyFiles/Downloads/1472-6831-13-59.pdf] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: File licence-reviewed. @Doc James: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Grafika nie posiada praw licencyjnych, co sprawia, że jest ogólnodostępnym plikiem.

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volleyboywarsaw (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. No files in request and deleted files uploaded by user are unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIOs. @Volleyboywarsaw: Please read COM:NETCOPYVIO and COM:L. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

== File:Bicca Olin.jpg and also File:Peppi Seppälä.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not yet deleted, but two pictures of mine have been flaged. The first one has for some reason in its metadata a foreign name, probably due to the camera being bought from ebay (so the previous owner or the one before them have somehow added their name to the metadata to all pictures taken by that camera). And the other problem is that the version I have loaded is from messenger where I sent it. Really quite hard to prove this, since the pictures have been taken a while ago and the persons in the pictures have all the pictures now, I don't have space to store the raws. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Folkki2080 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Folkki2080 (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Files not deleted as of 18:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC). @Folkki2080: Please follow the instructions on the speedy deletion tags to challenge deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pearlemaaney.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The image is took by me, Pearle Maaney is my second cousin. You can't find this image anywhere else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishwanath2245 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

(Vishwanath2245 (talk) 03:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC))

Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 03:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC). @Vishwanath2245: Please address concerns at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pearlemaaney.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LuizGoulart.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

== Arquivo: LuizGoulart.jpg ==

Grato pela atenção. Essa imagem pertence ao acervo da instituição Corrente da Paz Universal, criada por Luiz Goulart, da qual eu, Maximo Ribera, sou o diretor-presidente. Está publicada em nosso site correntedapaz.com, e como retemos os direitos de publicação do acervo, colocar essa e outras imagens do mesmo acervo em nossa página da Wikipedia não me parece violação de direitos autorais. Solicito, por favor, ajuda para o melhor procedimento de nossa parte no sentido de consolidar junto aos senhores a veracidade do que afirmamos. Muito Grato. Maximo Ribera- 08-01-2021-Maximo Ribera (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Maximo Ribera: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org or permissions-ptwikimedia.org . Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PrincipiaSynGen.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I created this book cover image from a painting that I commissioned specifically for this book cover. I also published the book.
The entire book, including the cover is considered 'Kopyleft,' meaning copyright free, or public domain, therefor I consider the image's inclusion on Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia to be valid and legitimate.

Synaptyx (talk) 12:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Synaptyx: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Carte-poitevin-saintongeais.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

[Fr]

Bonsoir,

Ce fichier est un fichier créé bénévolement pour et avec l'association Parlanjhe Asteur. Il est évidemment sur leur site internet (http://wp-parlanjhe.asteur.fr/index.php/2015/12/26/592/) avec d'autres cartes de vœux faites par moi-même, et sur le mien : https://lu-chapeu.jimdofree.com/gr-occitan-e-autres/peitavin-santong%C3%A9s-parlanjhe/.

Je suis graphiste, et défendeur des langues minoritaires, mes créations ont pour but de mettre la langue concernée en avant sur un support simple (carte de voeux, carte géographique...). Si certains de ces travaux sont sur Wikimedia Commons, c'est pour qu'elles soient accessible facilement, étant libres de droit.

Le poitevin-saintongeais est peu visible sur la toile, merci de restaurer ce fichier.

Bonne soirée.

--Jiròni B. (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Jiròni B.: Les œuvres publiées pour la première fois ailleurs nécessitent que le titulaire du droit d'auteur envoie une autorisation sous license dite «libre» par courriel à l'OTRS (permissions-commonswikimedia.org ou permissions-frwikimedia.org) Une fois que l'OTRS a déterminé qu'ils ont reçu une autorisation suffisante et qu'il n'y a pas d'autre raison de suppression, un(e) agent(e) de l'OTRS effectuera ou demandera la restauration. Merci de votre compréhension. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Picturesque Nepal (1912)

Latest comment: 3 years ago13 comments5 people in discussion

(Above per original listing.) I do not know which from which of the listed documents the listed images were generated; but it matters not, as both volumes appear to be scans of the same edition (printing, perhaps) of this work. This work was first published in the U.S., where it is in the public domain; thus, it is acceptable for inclusion at Wikimedia Commons. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC).

@ShakespeareFan00 and Fitindia: FYI Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Picturesque Nepal (1912), the country of origin is the United Kingdom, not the United States-- and if this is the case, undeletion may only occur in 2026. @TE(æ)A,ea.: Can you provide any evidence that this is not the case? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- The publishing company’s colophon (from the document) indicates simultaneous publication in the U.S.; thus, such is the country of origin. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC).
  - While the work does note agents in the US and other countries, the copy available on IA only notes
    LONDON
    ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK
    1912
    @TE(æ)A,ea.: Could you provide us with a US copy to prove that it was simultaneously published in both countries? (Please note this DR in which the OP provided a link to a US copy to prove simultaneous publication). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
    - The colophon would indicate that his office carried the works, which is sufficient for publication in the U.S. I do not need to, and could likely not easily, produce a copy printed in the U.S., but that does not mean that such work was not published in the U.S. (The standard at the time this book was printed was public display, with “tangible copies” availble for sale, which occurred.) TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC).
      - Oppose What we need to know is the country of first publication. A colophon may indicate publication in the US at some time but it does not indicate when it happened. A remark like "London & New York" would indicate simultaneous publication in both countries, but this way it looks like the book was first published in the UK and later sold in the US by said agents. That would make it a UK work first of all and non-free for Commons. Apart from that it is in fact you who needs to produce "tangible evidence" since you would like to have these files undeleted. De728631 (talk) 12:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
        That is incorrect. The U.S. is the country of first publication. Unless you have some stunning evidence which contradicts the claim that a publisher sold books at the offices listed in the book, then it was first published in the U.S. by law. According to Commons’ licensing policy, the work must be in the public domain under both U.S. law and the law of the country of origin; under U.S. law, this work was first published in the U.S., and is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC).
        @TE(æ)A,ea.: De728631 is correct here. Per COM:EVID, the burden is on the party seeking or supporting undeletion. We will need concrete evidence here that there was indeed simultaneous publication -- the colophon here does not provide the requisite evidence needed for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
        Why is the colophon insufficient evidence? I would consider the colophon to be an extension of the location given on the title page. It is currently practice to list a number of (location) offices on either the title or copyright page, and this function is served similarly by the colophon. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC).
        If indeed they were simultaneously published, we would have found evidence of such. I took a gander around library catalogues, book search engines, online bookstores, and found no evidence. Compare this with the work Kate Greenaway where there is clear evidence of simultaneous publication:
        New York: G. P. Putnum's Sons
        London: Adam and Charles Black
        1905
        --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
        That work indicates a different circumstance; for that book, it was printed by two different publishers. As I have said, I claim the colophon to be evidence of simultaneous publication, so your reference to another work, which was also simultaneously published, is not relevant. The way a book indicates simultaneous publication, or the method by which simultaneous publication occurs, does not matter. Printing a book through two publishers, one of which is in the U.S., qualifies, as does selling (or offering to sell) a book through a publisher’s office in the U.S., even if the book is not printed in the U.S. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC).

Not done No consensus to undelete. Thuresson (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TaiwanEct2.JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This file was originally deleted because of copyright © restrictions related to currency, but it's not a piece of money issued by the Chinese ("Taiwanese") government, it's a piece of exonumia, making it a government document eligible for "{{PD-ROC-official}}". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: It does not look like they are eligible for {{PD-ROC-official}}. While it is exonumia per ROC consumer voucher, it does contain artwork that is most likely copyrighted. Can you, perhaps, provide us with evidence that the artwork used on the vouchers are exempted for copyright protection? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

- @Nat: , ah, then I must have misunderstood the license, as I assumed that it pertained to all official government works and not just text because I first saw the license in works that didn't exclusively contain text. Files like "File:20080430 ROC-CLA 全國模範勞工當選證書勞資一字第0970125342號.jpg" and other files in this category. @Solomon203: as this user has more experience with this copyright © license. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Also note that the that the localised version uploaded to the Mandarin-Chinese Wikipedia is locally uploaded with the rationale "本圖用来展現一个貨幣單位。某些货币的图样是没有版权的，属于公有领域。有的则具有版权。如是者，当用于就货币本身进行的解说或评论时，在维基百科使用本圖属于合理使用。" ("This graph is used to show a currency unit. The drawings of certain currencies are not copyrighted and belong to the public domain. Some have copyright. If so, when it is used to explain or comment on the currency itself, the use of this picture on Wikipedia is a fair use." Translated by Google Translate.) which indicates that it is locally uploaded as currency 💱 rather than exonumia. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence that the artwork depicted on the vouchers are exempted from copyright and it appears that ZH-WP treats the vouchers as currency, and, therefore, assumed to be protected under ROC copyright law as if it were currency. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg

Would appear old enough to be PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Support PD-old-assumed and PD-US-expired can be applied. De728631 (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Abzeronow and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vitis vinifera - natürliche Wuchsform als Liane.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Das Bild ist gar nicht schlecht, man sollte die unbeeinflusste Wuchsform auch sehen. Sciencia58 (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Request by the original uploader. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vitis vinifera - natürliche Wuchsform als Liane.jpg. De728631 (talk) 14:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Sciencia58 and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Danse society VI album cover.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is my band and my image and can be used freely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulnashuk1 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Please send a permission by email from an account associated with your band. See COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 14:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Enos cover.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File:Enos cover.jpg

Please undelete the file Enos cover.jpg. I am the owner of enos magazine and of the cover photograph.--2A02:8108:4840:66E8:21F6:65D1:1531:6983 09:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Please send a permission by email as explained in COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gastroschisis-web.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Imaged created by the US government

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/gastroschisis.html

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

I assume this is the one, but tough to tell as a none admin. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Support Yes, that's the image with the baby. It should be undeleted as {{PD-USGov-HHS-CDC}}. De728631 (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Doc James and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:3-й окремий полк спеціального призначення.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File was deleted due to formal reasons:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:3-й окремий полк спеціального призначення.svg

I believe it was marked as "own work" because it was the author who did the actual vectorization from raster .jpg to vector .svg

See File:3 ОПСпП.png, which depicts same emblem, for example.

Emblems of the units of Armed forces of Ukraine are in the public domain according to the Ukrainian law, thus shouldn't be deleted:

{{PD-UA-exempt}}

--VoidWanderer (talk) 13:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

This emblem in use on a government website:

https://gur.mil.gov.ua/content/3-okremyi-polk-spetsialnoho-pryznachennia

--VoidWanderer (talk) 14:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @VoidWanderer: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tota bijagual mamapacha mapa res 1771 2016 x1900.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Our Ministry of Environment in Colombia (Minambiente - Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible) has sent an answer to a request for permission of use for this image for academic purposes, and they approve that use with no restriction (see their 22.1.2021 email, refered as: MADS 1462 de 2021, uploaded here: https://app.box.com/s/0eg1wk3s89tu30b1at4k6a2shkg96jhz). --Grasshopper (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The current backlog in permissions-commons queue is 3 days. When the permission email has been processed and approved by our team of volunteers, the file will be undeleted automatically. De728631 (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tolga Akcayli.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello :)

I see there the file I recently uploaded was marked for copy-right violation. Please note that I am Tolga Akcayli, and I own this file.

Please let me know if there is anything thing I can provide.

Tolga Akcayli January 28, 2020 --Tolgaria (talk) 17:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC) Tolga Akcayli January 28, 2020

Oppose - 1) Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission and 2) copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject; permission must therefore come directly from the former, or be in the form of the instrument that transferred the copyright. Эlcobbola _talk 17:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tolga Akcayli Summer.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello!

Please note the deletion was done in error. I am Tolga Akcayli and hold the copyright to the images.

If you need any further information please let me know.

--Tolgaria (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC) January 28, 2021 Tolga Akcayli January 28, 2021

Oppose - 1) Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission and 2) copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject; permission must therefore come directly from the former, or be in the form of the instrument that transferred the copyright. Эlcobbola _talk 17:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:No COVID-19 apps signs in the Netherlands

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Around six (6) months ago I created this category as I noticed that some "privacy freaks" (not sure how otherwise to call these people, not meant as an insult) would put up signs that people that have COVID-19 apps weren't allowed in their houses, shops, buildings, Etc. I noticed that this category was deleted with the reason "This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 09:15, 29 June 2020 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page Category:No COVID-19 apps signs in the Netherlands (CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content)) (thank)" and the files seemed to have been moved out of it into a less specific category. This tells me that these files aren't not educational (a double negative, I know), but also that these signs can't have their own category, why though? As it seems counterproductive to add them to a less specific category. Also, some of these notices seem to border on SARS-CoV-2 denialism so I wanted to create another category for those, but as this category was deleted I'm not sure if this should be created or if unspecific categories are preferred. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

So far I have only found two such files in Category:COVID-19 pandemic related signs in the Netherlands, so it seems to be a rather small phenomenon that would not warrant a category of its own. If there are more anti-warning-app pictures from other countries though, we should create a common category for all of them. De728631 (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done Files in this category can go into Category:COVID-19 apps and Category:COVID-19 pandemic related signs in the Netherlands for now. Thuresson (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2018 sadiq mehdiyev - esit.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

--Sadiq Mehdiyev (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. Please follow the instructions to request undeletion. The instructions says inter alia "State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.". Thuresson (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ShirleyTracannaLive2020.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is a pic from a concert that the photographer sent to the band, to use it as we wanted. I´m the singer of the band :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tracanna Shirley (talk • contribs) 15:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Previously published at [16] (photo #28). Please ask the photographer verify this by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. @Tracanna Shirley: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commonswikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Viaducto Las Polvorillas - Quebrada El Toro - Playas de Puerto Madryn - Etc.

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

--EduWiki 21:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Todas las fotografias son mias.

Y sólo una no lo es por Error mio, que es la fotografía de la Luna Llena.

Por Favor al Usuario Jeff G , deja de molestar ya que no estoy haciendo ningun Vandalismo ¡¡¡

== [[:File:Quebrada El Toro para restaurar.jpg]] ==

Es Fotografía de mi propiedad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EduWiki (talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

== [[:File:Mis Fotografías para No Eliminar.jpg]] ==

File:Quebrada El Toro.jpg File:Viaducto Las Polvorillas.jpg File:Puerto Madryn y sus Playas.jpg File:Cúpula de la Catedral Basílica de Salta.jpg Motivo: Todas son Mías. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EduWiki (talk • contribs) 00:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. None of the files listed has been deleted as of 01:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC). @EduWiki: Please follow the proper procedural to challenge the speedy deletion nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please restore the following pages:

File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Medeleine Carpentier autoportrait.png

Had missed this last year (artist who was Madeleine Carpentier had her name misspelled). Artist died in 1949 so this is definitely public domain in France now. Abzeronow (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yoshua_Bengio_2019.jpg and File:Mila_Team_2019.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please undelete the above given files. We got an OTRS permission with Ticket:2020100810018419.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:11. Bytomski Polmaraton 2019.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The proper agreement has just been sent by author of the picture. See: ticket:2021012910003964. Polimerek (talk) 12:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Polimerek: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)