User talk:Magnus Manske/Archive 13

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SSethi (WMF) in topic Starter kit for smaller wikis
← Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 →

Multiple selection

Hi. I think it would be a great improvement for tools like flickr2commons, petscan, and maybe other if they will allow users to do multiple selection via Shift+click [to start/end selection] in the list of items (frequently thousands) shown on result page. For F2C this is especially useful - users might want to exclude directly any potential FOP-problematic images or any other unwanted images. They are frequently consecutive and a multiple selection feature would be very helpful. But F2C has also another problem - working on big sets of images may cause some troubles sometimes; besides the missing multiple selection feature, if from a large set of images many already were transferred to Commons, currently they anyway are shown on result page and this makes it harder to do a good selection work, reviewing better the images which can be transferred.[1] XXN, 19:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Crop tags

In a case or 2 or 3, it seems you haven't looked very carefully at an image before crop tagging it, or the crop you tagged for had already been done. Otherwise good work. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Couple of questions

Hi! I remember some years ago here at Commons existed the gadget to upload all the files from one category in one click. And I had it activated. But I can't find nothing like this now. It still exist? Or something same? Second: do you have some lessons or instructions about your tools in one place? 'cos I can see that it is something great but I don't know where to start with for example Commons tools? --Shakko (talk) 16:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Rose Friedman.jpg

 
File:Rose Friedman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MB (talk) 17:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

International trucks

There is a discussion on this page whether images should be categorised as International trucks or International Harvester trucks.   Not many wikipedia contributors have contributed to the discussion or voted with their preference, but you have contributed to material on International Harvester.   I would be grateful, if you have the time, if you would share your own opinion on the page name.  And thank you. Eddaido (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Please keep it!

This is a very important photo, Please keep it, Thank You!

See [2] --223.140.155.50 11:52, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

  •   Oppose A request from an anonymous IP contributor claiming to be the owner of the copyright has no validity. We see far too many people here who claim to be something they are not, or who canvass.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Half up arrow.gif

 
File:Half up arrow.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 14:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Maneri-Sims up arrow.gif

 
File:Maneri-Sims up arrow.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Maneri-Sims down arrow.gif

 
File:Maneri-Sims down arrow.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 15:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Check arrow.gif

 
File:Check arrow.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 15:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Check up arrow.gif

 
File:Check up arrow.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 15:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Can't allow OAuth Uploader

Hello, people in the OAuth talk were suggesting to ask you about this issue since you are the author of Flickr2Commons. When I try to allow OAuth to do the necessary operations for Flickr2Commons to work, I get the following error: Error retrieving token: mwoauthdatastore-request-token-not-found. Do you have any ideas what is wrong and what can I do?--Decan (talk) 13:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

This is a known issue. The tool will work, just ignore the error message. --Magnus Manske (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker does not remove captions in infoboxes (if there was one)

To Magnus Manske,

I've noticed that the user User:CommonsDelinker does not remove the existing caption in the infoboxes. Hence I have removed two captions of deleted photos as they do not show up on the pages.

CommonsDelinker, in my view, should also remove infobox captions as well as the deleted photos so that Wikipedia users won't manually delete them. The only way to do that is to carefully modify it but you may not be the bot operator.

Thanks, Iggy the Swan (talk) 10:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker removing links prior to the files being deleted from Commons (was: File:406e1-020493cosantanastasio.jpg)

Hi Magnus. Judging by this query, CommonsDelinker has replaced File:406e1-020493cosantanastasio.jpg across a swathe of different wikis. On en:Trieste–Opicina tramway at least, it did this with the comment because: no permission. But the file still exists on Commons and there is absolutely no indication on its Commons page of any permission issues with it, or its OTRS ticket. Indeed you yourself seem to have transferred it to Commons from the Italian Wikipedia back in 2008. What is going on?. -- Chris j wood (talk) 13:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Eight hours after I wrote the above message, and over 24 hours after CommonsDelinker delinked the file, the file was deleted from Commons, and the deletion gives a trail as to why this happened. But the description of CommonsDelinker says that it just removes links to files deleted at Wikimedia Commons, not that it uses some form of precognition to remove links to files that are about to be deleted. And it says that if you want to know why your file has been deleted, you may ask the Commons' Administrator who deleted it, which clearly isn't particularly useful advice if the file has not yet been deleted. Seems like the description of CommonsDelinker needs updating to explain the circumstances in which links may be removed prior to the files being deleted, and how to discover why in these circumstances. -- Chris j wood (talk) 11:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
You sound angry. My bot can't see the future. It reacted to something that happened on Commons. Maybe you saw a stale cache? Maybe the image was deleted, then undeleted, then deleted again for good? --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
This was not a delete of the picture, but a replacemnt. Afaik these replacements are done by commands entered by an administrator. It is logical he does that before removing the old image. However it would be handy if the bot would put something in the edit comment like 'requested by <admin>'. Akoopal (talk) 23:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:SecondNatureImprov 8664.jpg

 
File:SecondNatureImprov 8664.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for creating the Flickr2Commons transferring service, it's amazing. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 10:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Lightmaker logo.png

 
File:Lightmaker logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

oauth failure — oauth_uploader.php

Hi MM. I am getting oauth failure

https://tools.wmflabs.org/magnustools/oauth_uploader.php?action=authorize

This tool facilitates file uploads to Wikimedia Commons, under your user name. You will have to authorise it first.

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /data/project/magnustools/public_html/oauth_uploader.php:112) in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/oauth.php on line 252

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /data/project/magnustools/public_html/oauth_uploader.php:112) in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/oauth.php on line 252

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/project/magnustools/public_html/oauth_uploader.php:112) in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/oauth.php on line 257

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/project/magnustools/public_html/oauth_uploader.php:112) in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/oauth.php on line 258

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/project/magnustools/public_html/oauth_uploader.php:112) in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/oauth.php on line 271
Please see https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:OAuth/authorize&oauth_token=0a10b880b967b1f7f346d0f0eaf8cca5&oauth_consumer_key=74a4d433d0ab9f9fad720e1c4eb8159a

Thanks for whatever you can do to resolve.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Noting that when I follow the mediawiki.org link, I get the error Error retrieving token: mwoauthdatastore-request-token-not-found. The grants still exist in my preferences. Has something changed in the Oauth that needs a kick?  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I can now use exCommons successfully, so closing this. Don't know the issue.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

Hi, Question about the tool. Can it upload multiple albums at 1 time? Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Sure, just open one browser tab with flickr2commons per set/album. --Magnus Manske (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
slam face on desk Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons upload limit

I encountered an upload limit not too long ago that Flickr2Commons said that I had to wait an unspecified amount of time and come back because I uploaded too much, how many images are that at a time? And how long do I have to wait? (I could resume uploading after a few hours, but I can't remember how many), note that I want to import a batch from a museum wirh over a thousand images. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 12:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


@Donald Trung: , hi Donald. If you go to special:listgrouprights and look under admins, youll see

Noratelimit

That means they don't have to wait x time before moving. We aren't admins so we don't have that right so we have to wait. Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

  Christmas Card
Fröhliche Weihnachten! Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons Bug

hi, sometimes Flickr2Commons will upload a file, but with a name for a different file. File:Centennial Event 121613-4412 02884 (13896580797) (2).jpg is an example. Bug? It arose when User:Majora messaged me on my wall. Artix Kreiger (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Oauth and Flickr2commons error

Magnus, can you fix Error retrieving token: mwoauthdatastore-request-token-not-found, please? It seems that problem lasts for some time (see reports on Meta). Thanks and happy holidays.--MaGa 17:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Known issue, unknown cause, flickr2commons will work, ignore the error. --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
OK, thank you.--MaGa 17:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Categories for Baglama2

Hi Magnus,

Would it be possible to add the following categories to Baglama2?

Thanks in advance! Best, AWossink (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Done. --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
@Magnus Manske: I'm sorry that I have to bother you about this again, but some of these categories have been renamed to bring them in line with more common naming conventions for GLAMs on Wikimedia Commons. Would it be possible to change the following categories in Baglama?
Best, --AWossink (talk) 09:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Done. --Magnus Manske (talk) 12:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Videos for Flickr2Commons

Hi,

I was wondering, for videos on flickr, do you plan on adding support for transferring videos? Artix Kreiger (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Also, is there a way to select those not on commons? Artix Kreiger 2 (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Firefox in ligurischer Sprache

Hallo Magnus Manke, ich bin Admin bei Wiki Ligure, der Wikipedia in ligurischer Sprache. Ich habe festgestellt, dass josve05a auf unsrer Home Page das Logo von Firefox in zeneize gestrichen hat. Dasselbe hat er auf der Seite "firefox" getan. Es wär korrekt gewesen, zuerst mich als Admin danach zu fragen oder darauf hinzuweisen, dass möglicherweise eine Urheberrechtsverletzung da sei. Dies ist allerdings nicht der Fall, denn H. Alessio Gastaldi (mit Gastaz als Benutzernamen in unserer Wiki tätig) hat in einem Briefwechsel seine Genehmigung erteilt. Dies wurde (wenn auch in genuesischer Sprache) beim Einsetzen des Logos und des Links angegeben. Er selber hat keine Zeit dafür gehabt, Logo und Link einzusetzen. Firefox in Zeneize ist ein Projekt von ihm, das er erfolgreich letztes Jahr beendet hat. Die genuesische/ligurische Version ist weltweit genehmigt und auf dieser Seite http://firefoxzeneize.altervista.org/ downloadbar. Sie ist für uns alle, die noch die noble Sprache des Christopher Kolumbus sprechen, ein großer Stolz und vor allen Dingen die Möglichkeit, diese alte Sprache in der heutigen Welt der Computer am Leben zu erhalten. Der Gastaz hat selber das neue Logo konzipiert und verwirklicht: Der Fuchs hält den Leuchtturm von Genua (genannt "Laterne") auf seiner Pfote. josve05a ist auf seiner Diskussionsseite bereits informiert und gebeten worden, alles wieder gutzumachen, wie es früher war. Sollte er nicht drauf reagieren, werde ich morgen seine Änderung streichen.

Zur gleichen Zeit frage ich auch, da ich als Admin noch viel zu lernen hab und technisch gesehen kein "computer native" bin, warum in diesem Fall der Benutzer josve05a nicht allein auftritt, sondern mit einem CommonsDelinker erscheint. Das sind Sachen, die mich noch ziemlich verwirren. ich warte auf eine prompte Nachricht von dir. Viele Grüße, Luensu1959 (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Cavalier Hotel Photo

Did you take the photo of the Cavalier Hotel? 842U (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Could you please delete this picture. It's a picture me, I don't know how it got there and I can't figure out how to delete it.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pavel_Solodovnikov.jpg#/media/File:Pavel_Solodovnikov.jpg

has been   Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons down?

Flickr2Commons has not been working for me since yesterday. Whenever I want to transfer an image, it turns blue like it is transferring but it never turns green, and never actually transfers to commons. MB298 (talk) 01:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

I've also had this problem the last few days. Animalparty (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Single Flickr photo ID in Flickr-to-Commons

@Magnus Manske: Hi Magnus, I feel sure this is the wrong place to tell you this but the above tool suddenly stopped working for me at around 12:20 on 23 February 2018. Possibly because the images were going through nice and smoothly and I didn't check to be sure an image was uploaded before uploading another. Please would you tell me how to fix my mistake. Many thanks, Eddaido (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, missed note at top of page. Uploads nicely again, thanks Eddaido (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

OAuth Uploader not completing its authorisation process

Hi Magnus. Not sure whether you can check from your end, however, I am getting the initial phase of the authorisation https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:OAuth/authorize&oauth_token=... however, when it passes the request to Tools https://tools.wmflabs.org/magnustools/oauth_uploader.php?oauth_verifier=... it is not recognised. Thanks if you can remedy the issue.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

This may explain the previous couple of questions where the other tools are failing.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: , I've gotten this as well. Artix Kreiger (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Something has changed and now I am able to get a login into OAuth, though I am not getting login status to show when using MediaWiki:ExCommons.js, it still shows me as not logged in. Purge does nothing to change that status.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Try it now.--Magnus Manske (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
No change, I am still getting the "Login to OAuth" on the delete page [3] Thanks for looking.  — billinghurst sDrewth 19:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Working now. :-) Takes a long time to check/load the authorisation at the delete page, however, it gets there in time. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

About categories

Hello Magnus Manske, your tool Flickr2Commons isn't auto-detecting categories from Flickr.--√Jæ√ 07:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Robert J. Walker, Governor of Kansas.png

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Robert J. Walker, Governor of Kansas.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

√Jæ√ 07:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Robert J. Walker, Governor of Kansas.png

 
File:Robert J. Walker, Governor of Kansas.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

√Jæ√ 07:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Matt Fallon 3.jpg

 
File:Matt Fallon 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ringerfan23 (talk) 23:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Fallon 2.jpg

 
File:Fallon 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ringerfan23 (talk) 23:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Fallon 1.jpg

 
File:Fallon 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ringerfan23 (talk) 23:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Keith Hogan.jpg

 
File:Keith Hogan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Flick2commons

Bringing this to your attention: Commons talk:Flickr2Commons.

Like probably most Commons users, I am not familiar with bitbucket. (I don't see any obvious "report bug" button there) Maybe it would be an idea to create one talk page here for bug reports from all tools? (and put a note there that you are more likely to look at minor things if people put them on bitbucket..) - Alexis Jazz 10:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:PZK 20140824 Koszalin 9610.jpg

@Magnus Manske: Hi Magnus,

how have your figured out, that there are more than 2 people on this photo?

What do you think about automatically removing images from Wikidata which have the tag {{Crop for Wikidata}}?

--Weltraumfieber (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Wrong substitutions on it.wiki

Hello! I just wanted you to be aware of these wrong substitutions that the CommonsDelinker made on it.wiki (I didn't know that you were the current operator) the last year.

Furthermore, the bot has just made a different type of error (the second substitution in the edit). I think it should check that the filename is preceded by a character in a range like [:=|]. --Horcrux92 (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hilferuf

Hallo Magnus, es gibt ein Problem in einem Javascript - du kannst das doch. Darf ich dich um einen helfenden Hinweis bitten, ist sicher eine Kleinigkeit für jemanden wie dich der sich auskennt. In folgendem snippet

	getToolName: function ( code ) {
		// TODO can be extended
		var toolList = [ "openoffice", "libreoffice", "sodipodi", "inkscape", "QGIS", "MATLAB", "Gnuplot", "CorelDRAW", "Illustrator"];
		var toolName = "";
		var i = toolList.length;
		while (i--) {
			if ( code.indexOf( toolList[i] ) + 1 ) {
				toolName = toolList[i];
				break;
			}
		}
		return toolName;
	},

soll nie ein leerer Wert zurückgegeben werden, sondern als default der Toolname "Unknown tool". Wie wäre das zu kodieren? Ich hoffe nun auf deine hilfreiche Antwort. -- sarang사랑 05:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Hm, statt
var toolName = "";

einfach

var toolName = "Unknown tool";

? Es sei auch darauf hingewiesen, dass dieser Code

  • immer ein undefined-Element überprüft (beim ersten Schleifen-durchlauf); behoben mit
var i = toolList.length-1;
  • auch Teil-Strings findet, z.B. "tra" findet "Illustrator"
  • case-sensitiv ist

Gegenvorschlag:

	getToolName: function ( code ) {
		// TODO can be extended
		let toolList = [ "openoffice", "libreoffice", "sodipodi", "inkscape", "QGIS", "MATLAB", "Gnuplot", "CorelDRAW", "Illustrator"];
		let tmp = toolList.filter ( tool => code.toLowerCase()==tool.toLowerCase() ) ;
		return tmp.length == 0 ? "Unknown tool" : tmp[0] ;
	}

Das findet nur genaue Übereinstimmungen, egal welche Groß/Kleinschreibung, und gibt den Tool-Namen aus der Liste oder "Unknown tool" zurück. --Magnus Manske (talk) 17:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Glacial response from OAuth uploader validation

Hi MM. Not sure whether you can check the validation process, however, seems to be taken greater than 5 minutes for me to get OAuth response, and longer to step through the entire validation process. From the outside one cannot see where the issue lies. I have tried both Firefox and Chrome for same tardy response. Not sure whether you can do or see something.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

voy:User:CommonsDelinker

Someone has tagged this page for speedy deletion. I'm an admin on WV & could delete it but do not understand the situation well enough to do that without consultation. Pashley (talk) 23:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Could you please help me to delete this picture?

I uploaded this picture by mistake, could you delete it? NickNYCN (talk) 15:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

File:KellyIngramMLKStatue.jpg

 
File:KellyIngramMLKStatue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Zhi1 seal.png

 
File:Zhi1 seal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wargaz (talk) 08:03, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Black silly putty.jpg

 
File:Black silly putty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zinnmann (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Categories in Baglama2

Hi Magnus,

Would it be possible to add the following category to Baglama2?

Category:Media from Netwerk Oorlogsbronnen

And would it be possible to change the listed Category:Regionaal Archief Alkmaar into Category:Media from Regionaal Archief Alkmaar?

Thanks!

Best, --AWossink (talk) 11:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Both done, changes will show up on next update. --Magnus Manske (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Toronto Odd Man Out1.jpg

 
File:Toronto Odd Man Out1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: See [4]
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Toronto Odd Man Out1.jpg

 
File:Toronto Odd Man Out1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons does not check for duplicates (or ignores them)

Also, the duplicate check that is in place is completely broken, I am unable to upload the original for File:CatLolCatExample.jpg.

If you are currently not able to fix these issues, how can we find someone who is? These duplicate uploads are causing a lot of time to be wasted and disruption on Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ludwig Fulda.jpg

 
File:Ludwig Fulda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Question about your tools

Hi. On my profile, I used to mention the number of personal works on Commons thanks to one of your tools, scanning the number of files in Category:Works by TwoWings and its subcategories. But it's not working anymore. Would it be possible to look at my profile introduction and fix the problem ? Thanks. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sminthopsis douglasi.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sminthopsis douglasi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sminthopsis douglasi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

TheDragonFire (talk) 11:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Karl Freund.JPG

 
File:Karl Freund.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Tepexpan.jpg

 
File:Tepexpan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerardoDT (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Straws

Hello Magnus, we are a social association and train disabled people for their professional future. We are currently building a new website. We found your picture on wikimedia with the straws and wanted to ask you to give us the permission to use it. we would be happy if you would answer us under info@befab.eu. Here is the link to the picture:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lightbox_photographs#/media/File:Straws_(3667985379).jpg


With kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.139.208.66 (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) File:Straws (3667985379).jpg is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. It was copied from https://www.flickr.com/photos/xlibber/3667985379/ on Flickr, before that disappeared. Use under the license should be fine. Flickr uploader xlibber also disappeared.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

File:50th Logo.jpg

 
File:50th Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

OAuth Uploader Not Working

Hi, The OAuth Uploader is not working for me. Can you take a look at it?


Thanks --Boothsift (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Is that still an issue? If so, what tool? Example parameters? --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Foto de Lola Alvarez Bravo (2267119327).jpg

 
File:Foto de Lola Alvarez Bravo (2267119327).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GMGtalk 19:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

My changes to photo: do you consider them acceptable?

Hello Magnus, I undertook what I felt was a modest improvement to your very illustrative photo of a tank next to the Kilcoy RSL Club in Queensland, File:Australian Army Leopard 1 tank, Kilcoy (Qld.) RSL.jpg. Someone has reverted the image on the grounds that my edit is an overwrite.

I had thought I was within the bounds of the guidance at Commons:Overwriting existing files, including this section:

DO overwrite Minor improvements

As a general rule, use the link "Upload a new version of this file" only for relatively minor improvements. Examples include:

   ...
   minor and uncontroversial color correction, noise reduction, perspective correction etc.
   removal of a watermark
   ... minor rotation corrections of images that are not upright
   minor cropping.

What's your opinion on this, please? I certainly don't want to cause you any offence. Your advice would be appreciated. SCHolar44 (talk) 11:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ken Moran.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ken Moran.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ken Moran.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 12:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Bot

  CommonsDelinker and his father.
Thank you for your bot CommonsDelinker ! Aabbccddeeffabcdef (talk) 10:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons error

Recently I have been unable to transfer files with Flickr2Commons. I get the red error "The file you submitted was empty". Changing file name doesn't seem to help. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Could you be a bit more specific? "It doesn't work" is not a helpful bug report. Which file on Flickr did you try to transfer? What file name did you try to give it? Other non-default parameters you used? --Magnus Manske (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Today Flickr got new SSL certificates which don't work on older machines and my flickrripper failed on them. No idea if related. Nemo 09:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

catnap

Hallo Magnus,

your tool catnap is really useful. The only problem is that the links are missing the file prefix. So the land on an usually not existing gallery page. Could you fix that?

Thanks a lot. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Error in MoveToCommons

I do not know how to use BitBucket, so the bug report is left here. Recently when I try to open MoveToCommons, the application just returns a "500 - Internal Server Error". What is it about? Is it a HTTP error? Anyways I hope the bug would be fixed, thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Access to flickr2commons

Hi Magnus, flickr2commons will not let me in — since around this time yesterday. It hangs on "Loading..." Just so's you know. Regards, Eddaido (talk) 00:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes. This issue also arouse me. I have experienced similar things before, but those issues can be resolved within a day. However, this time the problem has continued for more than two days (starting from 15:00 UTC 16 February), and this affected thousands of users. I hope you can find the problems of this tool and solved it ASAP. I'm writing just to inform you, regards. --B dash (talk) 15:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Albanian Car Plate Example (Tirana Plate).jpg

 
File:Albanian Car Plate Example (Tirana Plate).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Upwinxp (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Commonshelper no longer working

Hello Magnus,

This is no longer working, https://tools.wmflabs.org/commonshelper just results in an "Error 502 Bad gateway". I hope you see this — several attempts to leave this message at bitbucket were unsuccessful.  JGHowes  talk 21:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Thomas Mercer.png

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Thomas Mercer.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Thomas Mercer.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

File:ChromesettingEckieThumb.png

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Magnus Manske!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Sije (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

@Sije: to put those templated messages on the pages of super-experienced users is inappropriate. Schwede66 23:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Sorry. I didn't mean to be rude. I just thought you might want to know that a page that your bot has uploaded was uncategorized and also undescribed. (I also don’t think that I’m obligated to check whether a user whom I want to notify is or is not super-experienced). Sorry and thanks for understanding, --Sije (talk) 23:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

picture

Dear Sir, I am coordinating the publication of a new textbook of zoology (in Italian) and I wonder whether I can use your picture published in:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ASunspider.jpg

In the case, you will be credited for it. Best regards and thank you for your attention. Loriano Ballarin

Loriano Ballarin, Associate professor of zoology Department of Biology, University of Padova email: loriano.ballarin@unipd.it — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 147.162.3.230 (talk) 09:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Dear sir, please check the "Author" line on the image page to find the actual author of the image. --Magnus Manske (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Pistol (4).jpg

 
File:Pistol (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 09:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Info über neue Bilder

Guten Tag Magnus Manske,
gibt es schon eine zeitliche Erwartung, wann "https://petscan.wmflabs.org" für Informationen von Neubildern wieder in Funktion gehen wird?
Vielen Dank und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 11:39, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker has stalled on category move requests

The category move request currently at the top of the command queue requires administrative permissions to complete, which seems to have lead to the bot getting "stuck" on it for the past three days. It has not processed any other category moves since that time, though it has processed other types of commands in the interim. Just thought I'd let you know. - Jadebenn (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Pywikipedia scripts, please move them by hand. The cats are too nested (Cat-A-Lot not working as well wit those). --Steinsplitter (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Ah, this was not you. Should be fixed now. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC) Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

Dear Magnus, Flickr2commons does not work at the moment. Maybe you are able to solve the problem. If you have time for it.... Kind regards and all the best, Rudolphous (talk) 13:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker has stalled on universal replace requests

Hi Magnus (and @Steinsplitter: ), it seems that the bot is stuck in file rename/replace since few days ago. Can you check it please? Cheers! --Ruthven (msg) 22:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Fixed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Please

Please, do not replace filenames when they're immediately preceded by other text. Thank you! --Horcrux (talk) 20:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Belarusian Arabic alphabet-P 2.png

 
File:Belarusian Arabic alphabet-P 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Seveleu-Dubrovnik (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SaulBellowcropped.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SaulBellowcropped.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

sourced to image since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Move-to-Commons helper dead?

Hello,

This is kaput. https://tools.wmflabs.org/commonshelper results in "504 Gateway Time out".  JGHowes  talk 23:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Karl Stetter.jpg

 
File:Karl Stetter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kingcult2 (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Do you support the idea of FileImporter/FileExporter?

It might deprecate your CommonsHelper tool. Calvinkulit (talk) 07:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Oh yes I do, though the people who made it say it's not supposed to be a replacement. Less tools = less maintenance = me like --Magnus Manske (talk) 07:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
At least it doesn't need OAuth, unlike CommonsHelper (and imagecopy.py). Calvinkulittc 07:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rectangular2 plan profile.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rectangular2 plan profile.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rectangular2 plan profile.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pithouse2.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pithouse2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Pithouse2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ireland-Linfield Mural.jpg

 
File:Ireland-Linfield Mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Magnus Manske,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

A bug in CommonsDelinker ?

Can you explain this change of CommonsDelinker bot? file:US $2 obverse.jpg exist and I don't see and request to delete it and the file was replace by file:US bill obverse series 2003 A.jpg that it isn't exist. Did it try to change to file:US $2 bill obverse series 2003 A.jpg? anyway this change need to be checked. Yona B. (t) 19:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker - move cat

Hi Magnus Manske
I wanted to move Euro banknote colour changing printing to Euro banknote optically variable printing. I have added th request on 2019-12-03, but the files weren't moved. It's not that the 4 images would be a big problem, I just wonder what the problem is. Does the bot not move images out of no longer existing categories (I deleted the category when I added the move request)? I read {{Move cat}} but maybe I missed some information.
--D-Kuru (talk) 10:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

The files are moved now. The files weren't moved by CommonsDelinker, but by Achim55. So I still have no idea why the bot did not move the images. --D-Kuru (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

ExCommons.js seems to be hanging on OAuth check

Error in upload with commonshelper (Wikisource -> Commons)

An error occurs when I try to move s:es:File:Autoridades-I-002.jpg to Commons with commonshelper, the error that appears is:

Querying image data ...done.
Retrieving image description ...done.
ERROR: The file you submitted was empty.

Whats wrong?, Thanks Shooke    (Talk me in spanish, english or italian) 00:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for help me.

Hello.Thank you for writing Hikaru akao's information.If you don't mind,Could you write Maiko irie and Mii takahashi's information. Thank you very much. Bebepianin (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

wdfist

Hello Magnus, please stop adding requests "Crop for Wikidata" on completely unsuitable photos for creating portrait crops from it, like here. This is

  1. not useful, it would be a personality right defamation at the depicted persons
  2. edit war.

Thanks, --Stepro (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Polypedates megacephalus (mating), Spot-legged tree frog - Khao Nang Phanthurat Forest Park (34388069214).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polypedates megacephalus (mating), Spot-legged tree frog - Khao Nang Phanthurat Forest Park (34388069214).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Sultan of Brunei with Khamtay Siphandone (cropped).png

 
File:Sultan of Brunei with Khamtay Siphandone (cropped).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunofficial1998 (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Delinker

Hallo Magnus, kannst du bitte mal den Delinker anschubsen? Steinsplitter ist nicht erreichbar. Danke & Gruß, --Achim (talk) 23:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Jetzt erst gesehen, neu gestartet. --Magnus Manske (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

canh6524 Canhductu111 (talk) 12:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

image on wikipedia entry for margaret cavendish

Hi Magnus,

The image you uploaded on the Margaret Cavendish page in Wikipedia does not represent her. According to her biography, Mad Madge, it is an image of Mary Lucas, her sister. Is it possible to remove it? It is misleading as is. This is the link to the image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Margaret_Cavendish.jpg

Thanks!

canhductu1980g.zendesk.com Canhductu111 (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

hoang van canh Canhductu111 (talk) 20:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

5666313782707 Canhductu111 (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

84364196659 Canhductu111 (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Beethoven - Piano sonata in C minor (opus 111), movement 1.ogg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Emma Wengberg.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Emma Wengberg.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 11:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Emma Wengberg.jpg

 
File:Emma Wengberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Florentyna (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Please help! I can't transfer Flickr images to Wikimedia Commons using Flickr2Commons!

Please enable your Flickr API key again. I still need Flickr2Commons to transfer images from Flickr to Wikimedia Commons.

Enable it from here: https://www.flickr.com/services/apps/create/

Alex Neman (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Pjotr Alexandrowitsch Tschichatschow.jpeg

 
File:Pjotr Alexandrowitsch Tschichatschow.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Commons API - CORS

Hello, I'm trying to use the Commons API in a web app but it seems that CORS is not enabled. I haven't found documentation neither the repo on your GitBucket, if there is a more appropriate place for the discussion please let me know. Also, is it possible to get the results in JSON rather than HTML? And finally, is it possible to get the same informations using the Wikimedia API? thank you! Sette-quattro (talk) 07:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Petscan

Hello Magnus. Just tried to use Petscan, but it is 504 :( Looks like it is the same for others. Anthere (talk) 10:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Magnus Manske!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Flickr: Irish stamp, 'Boomerang (horse)'

Hallo, could this [[5]] Flickr photo of: Irish stamp, 'Boomerang (horse)' be used on [[6]] Wiki. page? Thank you

Да Anji-dag (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Werner Weidenfeld.jpg

 
File:Werner Weidenfeld.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Nominated for deletion by User:2.247.248.210. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

flickr2commons not working

I tried to go to Bitbucket but couldn't figure out how to file a report.

Whenever I run a file it just goes to "0 files currently selected and ready to transfer; 0 have a name issue." Doesn't pull up the image at all.

Kingofthedead (talk) 06:53, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

never mind, figured it out Kingofthedead (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Delinker

Hi there, hope you are well. In Indonesian Wikipedia, there are more than 11,000 articles in id:Kategori:Halaman dengan berkas rusak (Pages with missing files). I wanna ask if your bot can handle this case, or maybe you would be able to share some scripts in Pywikibot (PAWS), maybe? Kind regards. Albert (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Alexander Lukomsky.jpg

 
File:Alexander Lukomsky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker on itwiki

Hi, the bot CommonsDelinker on itwiki do not write properly wikilinks in the edit summary (cf. itwiki contributions) --ValeJappo (talk) 07:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

 
File:Untitled (Undated) - José de Almada Negreiros (1893-1970) (32222769114).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Ken Jebsen und Steffen Schwarzkopf.jpg

 
File:Ken Jebsen und Steffen Schwarzkopf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MAyo (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Starter kit for smaller wikis

Hello, and greetings! As part of a Starter kit project for smaller wikis, there is a work-in-progress guide around Bots & Tools here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Small_wiki_toolkits/Starter_kit/Bots_and_Tools. I'm reaching out with a few questions, as there is a mention of the CommonsDelinker on this page in the list of useful bots section:

  • Is it okay to have the bot listed in that section? Are there any concerns?
  • Would you be okay with folks from smaller wikis reaching out to you for help, and would you be willing to list your preferred method of contact under "Bot owner contact"?
  • Is there anything like a note or reminder related to the bot that you would like to add in the "description" column?

Additionally, if you have a suggestion for any other bots or tools currently on the list which should not be there and those that are not there and should be there, I would love to know about them—looking forward to your input! Srishti (talk) 07:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Magnus Manske/Archive 13".