Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Oaktree b

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Oaktree b!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

TUSC token 2a2a2ac104ad23693b13623348da3d5cEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 4becf11685f872ad80327433f3b76c5aEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

City of Toronto archives shotsEdit

Thanks for uplaoding these images. If you can, it's usually better to upload these images from your hard drive, rather than directly from Flickr using Magnus bot, because COTA images typically need to be cropped to remove the notation (and it's a bit of a hassle to do it after the upload). Thanks. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, don't have the time to crop and upload.Oaktree b (talk) 03:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
You do understand that you are creating more work for other people? We all upload images sometimes that need a crop, but doing it repeatedly just adds to the backlog of work that others need to do. At a minimum, please add a {{crop}} tag.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

adding a boxEdit

Could you please update the comment you added to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Osama bin Laden making a video at his compound in Pakistan-2.jpg to put a box around the e-mail message? I'll help make it stand out better from the discussion. For example.

This is an example of the e-mail.

Pull this message up in edit mode and you'll see how I did the box. There's the opening div at the beginning and a closing /div at the end. Thank you. Marc Kupper (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

DoD responseEdit

So you got this email in response to your question about these Osama bin Laden images?--Chaser (talk) 03:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

That's the response that pops-up after you send the email, I guess they send the "official" response when they read your email. Sounds good enough for me to allow usage in Commons... Oaktree b (talk) 03:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
So you're saying you haven't yet gotten a response that is specific to your question?--Chaser (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
(you can respond here)

File:British spellings in NEJM 1814.jpgEdit

Final -re and -our weren't really perceived as "British spellings" at that time (more like non-Noah-Webster spellings...). -- AnonMoos (talk)

Le Tricolore flotte-t-il sur Versailles ?Edit

Suite à ta question, la réponse est oui !

Trizek here or on fr:wp 08:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Konferentzia.ogvEdit

Hi. This file: Konferentzia.ogv has

 

   

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
  • share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

permission. See Here. Argia.com is a web of a basque magazine called Argia. Below in that page and in basque language you can read this:

Lizentzia: Multimedia kanalean dauden ARGIAk sortutako edukiak Creative Commons lizentziapean daude. Lan hauek kopiatu, banatu, lan eratorriak sortu eta jendaurrean heda ditzakezu, beti ere lanaren egiletza aitortzen baduzu.

The translation to english:

Licence: The contents that ARGIA has created in the multimedia canal are in Creative Commons licence. You can copy, divulge, create substitute works and show to the people, if you always the authority of the original autor.

Basque Permission English Permission

So, please, don't delete this file. Thanks and bye. Euskaldunaa - 8:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Images from the National Library of IrelandEdit

Hi. If uploading/transfering addtional NLI images, could we maybe ensure we categorise them under Category:Images from the National Library of Ireland? (So we keep track of them?) Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Laurel and Hardy This is your Life.jpg Date?Edit

Hello. For File:Laurel and Hardy This is your Life.jpg you provide information that appears contradictory, dating the image from both 1954 and 1956. Would you be able to clarify the situation, please? Thanks! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


File:Farewell, American Soldiers!.jpgEdit

How can this be under a CC license? It should be either PD or copyright violation... AnonMoos (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Released under a CC license by the library that holds the document in their collection. Oaktree b (talk) 02:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
That's nice -- the library presumably did not have the copyright on this leaflet assigned to it by the Japanese ministry of propaganda, and the mere act of mechanically scanning in a 2D source does not create any new copyright which is recognized by Wikimedia Commons policies. Therefore the copyright tags are still wrong. You can ask for a third opinion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. AnonMoos (talk) 03:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Farewell, American Soldiers!.jpgEdit

 
File:Farewell, American Soldiers!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AnonMoos (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


VOA imagesEdit

Hello,

I didn't tag them, that was done by someone else. The problem is that these were not made by VOA, but by press agencies, and are therefore copyrighted. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Oaktree b,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


File:PRR rail section drawing.jpgEdit

 
File:PRR rail section drawing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jahoe (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lotto-Quebec HQ.jpgEdit

 
File:Lotto-Quebec HQ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Melpop (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:French Mirage 2000 prepares to refuel from a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker over Africa on Feb. 2, 2013.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

new messageEdit

there is a new message and image for you at the graphics lab. Penyulap 18:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

File:GOES coverage.svgEdit

SVG file contains embedded raster image only (no actual vector data). AnonMoos (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wylve (talk) 07:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Prize winning cheese by the makers of Wisconsin Goliath Cheeses, Steves Cheese produced by Steves Cheese Co., Denmark, Wisconsin.jpgEdit

 
File:Prize winning cheese by the makers of Wisconsin Goliath Cheeses, Steves Cheese produced by Steves Cheese Co., Denmark, Wisconsin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 10:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

talkbackEdit

@ video workshop --McZusatz (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)


File:Ripleys Aquarium Toronto map.pngEdit

 
File:Ripleys Aquarium Toronto map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

91.57.85.109 23:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


45–47 Front Street EastEdit

Hello. FYI - all three buildings have been designated by the City of Toronto. The CRHP (historicplaces.ca) is very incomplete. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

CaptionEdit

Thank you for the regular help with translations. Please mind that ru: «дым» means «smoke», but ru: «Дыма» means «Dyma», for it is a surname of a person  . --Переславская неделя (talk) 01:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Muskmelon, the largest in cultivation (extract)Edit

Hi, I've uploaded the cropped/mirrored/rotated version of the image as you requested here. If you like the result, you may want to tag as "solved" the request. Cheers, -- Fulvio 314 16:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks from SolothurnEdit

Hi Oaktree b; thanks a lot for your work on the Zentralbibliothek Solothurn files! Much appreciated :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Oaktree b,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 


Puns in File:Zentralbibliothek Solothurn - Abbildungen zur Länder u Völkerkunde - a0486.tifEdit

Hi again, Oaktree b! :-) - Thanks four your description translations in File:Zentralbibliothek Solothurn - Abbildungen zur Länder u Völkerkunde - a0486.tif. However, I think they missed the fact that the illustrations are based on wordplay, i.e. puns on the names of city inhabitants. Of course I do not blame you for this at all, because, as you told me, you don't read German and translate the descriptions with the help of Google Translate, which of course can't detect puns :-). If one reads German, the nature of the puns is obvious, but I think it needs some explanation in the English and French description. I have tried to do this now in the English description - but as I don't write French, maybe you could adapt the French description based upon the now-revised English one? Would be great! Gestumblindi (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Oaktree b,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Doi călușariEdit

I have posted an interim restoration of the image "Doi călușari" which largely addresses the issues it had. I may be able to tweak it a but further but I think it is now generally usable as an inline illustration. (See here) I note also that you are a railfan so I invite you to visit my Wikipedia userpage which has information about my railroad history and image contributions to WP, about my four books on North American railroad history (one of which is exclusively about Canadian railways), and links to my various railroad history websites. Centpacrr (talk) 03:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

  • I have completed and uploaded the final reconstruction and restoration of this image to Commons. Please review it so that the request can be marked as "Resolved".Centpacrr (talk) 19:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 
Final reconstruction and restoration


File:Terra Nova Bay Google Earth usgs view.pngEdit

 
File:Terra Nova Bay Google Earth usgs view.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 15:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Sfinții Voievozi Monastery inside.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sfinții Voievozi Monastery inside.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Edward-furlong-mugshot-01.jpgEdit

 
File:Edward-furlong-mugshot-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Binksternet (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Toronto Public Library locations.jpg requires updatingEdit

Hi Oaktree b,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Toronto Public Library locations.jpg is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. Mindmatrix 15:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for checking into this. The new branch is Fort York, but as you've stated, it doesn't appear to be included in the library's KML file. Mindmatrix 14:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
It appears to be on the plot of land immediately east of Bathurst and south of the rail lands (see branch info map). My best guess is 43.64N, 79.40W (Google Maps link), give or take depending on where you want to centre it. Mindmatrix 14:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Envelope Contraband of war.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Envelope Contraband of war.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Christy Mathewson Baseball magazine cover 1914.jpegEdit

 
File:Christy Mathewson Baseball magazine cover 1914.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bracquetball (talk) 01:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Fichiers des musées départmentaux de la Haute-SaôneEdit

Bonjour

J'ai vu que vous aviez modifié certains des fichiers des Musées départementaux de la Haute-Saône.

C'est moi qui m'occupe en ce moment de verser les fichiers de cette collection sur Wikimedia.

Pouvez vous m'indiquer par mail via nico.public AT ouvaton.org comment vous êtes tombé sur ces fichiers et si vous avez un intérêt particulier à travailler dessus ?

Bien cordialement Tounoki (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Re:Some baklava for you!Edit

Thank you! Cathy Richards (talk) 13:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Vânător de munte.jpgEdit

Here it is your requested cropped image:

Best regards.--Carnby (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Harry Connick imageEdit

You uploaded File:Harry+Conick+Jr+at+LOC+event+-+main.jpg claiming it was taken by Abby Brack of the Library of Congress but gave the source as VoA. The only image I can find at LOC by Abby Brack is the one on this webpage which is not the same as the VoA source image which is attributed to the AP. There are other images from the same event online possibly aken by other attendees. So my question is, are you sure the image is properly attributed? I was tring to find the LOC source in order to add the correct LOC digital ID which is missing from the LOC template. Just drop me a talkback or ping me. Ww2censor (talk) 18:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

At the time, it was tagged on the Voice of America website as being a photo made by the LOC. Loading the link now, it seems to be an AP photo. It can be deleted; I get these popping up now and again, it seems the LOC was not properly attributing their photo sources. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
This Wayback Machine archive page does indeed attribute the image to Abby Brack. Do we even know if she is/was an employee of the LOC? If not either way I think I'll nominate it for deletion is you agree. Ww2censor (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Actually, it seems she was an employee of the Library of Congress, might be ok to leave it. See http://www.abbybrack.com/pages/3/About/About/ Oaktree b (talk) 22:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Nelson's Pillar, DublinEdit

How do you know that this image was released into the public domain by the NLI? You added a release statement tot he image but I doubt it can be verified. The direct NLI link lists the author as Michael S. Walker and a search of his work indicates he was still active in 1988 and maybe even later, so the image cannot be in the public domain. The NLI has just not got any more information but we can deduce a copyright range date from their catalogue. Please let me know what you think. Ww2censor (talk) 10:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

With regards to the photo of Nelson's Pillar [[1]] it was posted on the NLI Flickr Commons photostream. They only allow photos in the public domain, so the NLI holds the rights to the photo and released it into the public domain. Oaktree b (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually that is not true they did not release it in the the public domain they released it as "no known copyright restrictions" which is entirely different. A few such images have been deleted because the photographer was not dead 70 years as with this one. I think it is actually still in copyright because the NLI's catalogue lists the author as Michael S. Walker. A search of their holding shows he was still active in 1988 and maybe even later, so its copyright status is actually unclear. The "no known copyright restrictions" tag states that one should add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined which puts the onus on us and not on the institution. The NLI tag does not verify the image is in the public domain, just that they don't know of any restriction. I've been dealing with copyright issues for a long time and that's my take on it. I though perhaps you had researched it more and found some verification that it is in the public domain. Thanks anyway. Ww2censor (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

VOAEdit

There are many files under VOA on commons after 2013. I though the discussion was still going on at Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:PD-USGov-VOA. Is it now clarified that we can not use VOA file after june 2013 ? (see a request of deletion discussed here File talk:Phurbu T. Namgyal.jpg). Best wishes. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your response. Do you think I could use {{PD-USGov-VOA|yes this is original VOA work, not by AP or AFP etc=yes}} and place it myself on files that I uploaded under VOA license? This may help work of verification. However, it should be stated in this tag "between 1998 and June 2013", so something like {{PD-USGov-VOA|yes this is original VOA work between 1998 and June 2013, not by AP or AFP etc=yes}} --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 16:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. The current tag {{PD-USGov-VOA|yes this is original VOA work, not by AP or AFP etc=yes}} correspond to Category:PD VOA (VOA). It is meant to correspond to non AP/AFP file. If I find one of my VOA file after june 2013, shall I indicate my self to speedy delete it ? --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

VOA RequestEdit

Have you also sent a request to VOA? What is the result? Look at my story: User talk:Krassotkin#VoA. I still do not have the final answer, although I remind them once a week for three months:(. --sasha (krassotkin) 06:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 08:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

The Romanian river monitorsEdit

Greetings. I noticed one of your works, called "Sergeant serving on NMS Catargiu" or something, and I was wondering: could you please create a file for the actual Lascăr Catargiu river monitor? I found a picture of her here, together with Brătianu. There's also a rather small picture with Mihail Kogălniceanu here, or a general digital model for a Romanian monitor of the class here, from Photobucket. Or, if neither of these can be used, maybe you can at least create English versions of the Russian files used here. Either way, please, at least 1 picture. For it is a shame, that these vessels, the largest and most powerful Danube warships, of almost 700 tons, to have actually no picture file of them on the English Wiki. 79.118.118.244 15:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A heads-upEdit

I sent you an email about your recent upload of File:Don R. (West Don R.), looking north across Yonge St. bridge (30040304340).jpg Geo Swan (talk) 04:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:You Bet Your Life.jpgEdit

 
File:You Bet Your Life.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Oaktree b,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves EarthEdit

Good day, I saw that you uploaded several pictures for Wiki Loves Earth in Canada. In order to be eligible for the contest, the description of the pictures must include the Wikidata item Q-number for the protected area depicted on each picture. Thank you for submitting your pictures. If you need help, don't hesitate to contact me, Amqui (talk) 03:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Category contentEdit

Hello,

Hope your day is going well. My edit to a category you made may have popped up on your watchlist. While the content you copied and pasted from NASA is in public domain, you need to accredit the source. It's different if you were using the content for an image description because the source would have been already listed on that page.

Thanks, ~riley (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Buttonville Institute front door other side.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

International trucksEdit

There is a discussion on this page whether images should be categorised as International trucks or International Harvester trucks.   Not many wikipedia contributors have contributed to the discussion or voted with their preference, but you have contributed to material on International Harvester.   I would be grateful, if you have the time, if you would share your own opinion on the page name.  And thank you. Eddaido (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)


File:"Largest pile of potatoes in the world," warehouse view J.R. Simplot Dehydrating Co., Caldwell, Idaho.jpgEdit

 
File:"Largest pile of potatoes in the world," warehouse view J.R. Simplot Dehydrating Co., Caldwell, Idaho.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User-duck (talk) 04:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:WTSS broadcast area map FCC.pngEdit

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 12:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

File:'Russia’s Tibet’ Opens to Jet-Age Tourism.theora.ogvEdit

Hello, can you please clarify the source of the file ? It is not showing on the link provided. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 11:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Karelj: 12:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!Edit

Hi there, I was wondering if it was at all possible to use your image that you posted to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_van_attack#/media/File:Toronto_Remembers_2018.jpg. I work for RNAO and we wanted to use an image like this just to say thank you to the people who have donated blood and Sunnybrook Hospital. you can reach me at azarboni@rnao.ca. For now, I was going to grab the image and use it with attribution on the article page. Let me know if this is okay. I hate using images without express permission. - Adam Zarboni

Jokerbewild (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

File:VOA Woman's March Paris 839E3D98-A766-4BBE-874E-3B70E7E1CB51 w610 r1 s.jpgEdit

 
File:VOA Woman's March Paris 839E3D98-A766-4BBE-874E-3B70E7E1CB51 w610 r1 s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FallingGravity (talk) 05:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Duplicate versions of 1957 Railway Map Atlas of CanadaEdit

There seem to be duplicate versions of the Atlas of Canada's 1957 railway map at File:1957 Railway Map Atlas of Canada.pdf and File:1957 Railway Map of Canada 083.pdf. You uploaded both, undoubtedly the second copy by accident. I have tagged the "1957 Railway Map Atlas of Canada" version with a {{Duplicate}} template for speedy deletion. --papageno (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Oaktree b".