Open main menu

Contents

Hilma af KlintEdit

Beste Hannolans, geïnspireerd door jouw werk op NLWP was ik gisteren heel erg enthousiast afbeeldingen van het werk van Hilma af Klint gaan uploaden hier. (Wat een prachtig werk, vind ik!) Pas daarna las ik jullie discussie over auteursrecht rond haar werk. Ik ben geneigd om de door mij geüploade plaatjes voorlopig te laten staan en ze zelf niet te gaan nomineren voor verwijdering, omdat dat criterium van publicatiedatum zo vaag is. Of kijk jij er anders naar? Spinster (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Eens en ja het is echt uitmuntend werk, ben zeer onder de indruk. Het lijkt me ondertussen goed dat het copyright wordt uitgezocht maar niet dat we in een patstelling komen. Ook met Mondriaan Trust zie ik nog geen discussie over de publicatiedatum als criterium.
In 2013 is een boek verschenen met een groot deel van het oeuvre, met niet eerder verschenen werk. Die werken zouden daardoor vrij van auteursrechten zijn als ik de discussie mag geloven. Ik kan me zo voorstellen dat een manier is om alles uit dat boek er op te plaatsen met bronvermelding naar het boek en ondertussen, mochten we catalogi vinden van tentoonstellingen tussen 1987-2002, werken die daarin voorkomen te nomineren voor verwijdering. Zelfs dan is het niet zeker dat ze verwijderd moeten worden, want een vraag is wat telt als publicatie in de VS. Ik was van plan even in de bibliotheek van het gemeentemuseum Den Haag te kijken wat daar te vinden is. Ik heb ook de stichting een e-mail gestuurd met de vraag over het copyright, wellicht dat zij hier al over hebben nagedacht en een standpunt hebben. Ondertussen zouden we de tag voor de VS leeg kunnen laten zoals je ook hebt gedaan, want dan klopt het precies: werk is in de EU publiek domein. --Hannolans (talk) 13:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hier staan overigens enkele bestanden in groot formaat: http://hilmaafklinten.louisiana.dk/

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi I corrected it. I used the same license as the other two photographs of the same OTRS and upload. It was original posted on the english Wikipedia with three files in one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rainbow_Station.jpg --Hannolans (talk) 21:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

de file van Phoenix Rising in die versie is een illegale downloadEdit

van Hannolans en niet de versie die door de maker Karl Hammer aan wikicommons vrijgegeven. Daarmee is er dus ook voor die versie geen publicatietoestemming op wikicoomons. Graag verwijderen.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.69.193.191 (talk • contribs)
Hi Hannolans,
as a first measure, I've reset to the initial upload of File:Phoenix Rising.jpg by Karl Hammer. --Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The art work is published with a Creative Commons license and a better reproduction of the work is encouraged. The text is not creative enough to establish a derative work. Or do you see those as derative works?
This image is currently in use in two wikipedia articles about bodypainting as the main image. With this watermark this image seems less usable as the watermark destracts the article. What's your opinion? --Hannolans (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Ah I see there is also an 'image war' about this image in one of the articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Body_painting#Image_war.3F If this image is removed from that page and the nlwiki it isn't a problem anymore. --Hannolans (talk) 10:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I am not a Dutch-speaker. But what I understood from the IP's comment is that the high-res version, which you took from the cited website, is not under a free license. That's the main issue that needs to be discussed.
Sure, an image without a watermark is better than one with a watermark. But if the first is not under a free license, that's meaningless. In regard to whether the first or the second version, uploded by Karl Hammer, is better, IMO the first one is better, as the watermark is far smaller than in the second version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I see, but I try to understand the reasoning for future artworks. The reasoning is that this reproduction is a derative work of art, so not the artwork itself is under CC, but the version with that watermark added? If I retouch the work (it is not CC-ND) and make a derative work of it without watermark, would it be allowed? --Hannolans (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

I am not sure to fully understand you. The originally creator-uploaded version had 750 × 500 pix and a watermark, Your later uploaded version had 1.600 × 1.023 pix and was sourced from a seemingly non-(totally)free source[1]. If these facts are true, then the situation is clear.
However, if you are refering to the discussion in late 2013 or 2014 on Commons, whether a CC license relates to the work itself, but not to a specific resolution of a digital work; well, this discussion never yielded a consensus. Mayority opinion, if I remember correctly, was that on Commons we will respect the wish of the creator/author. In practical terms this means: if a creator uploads a lower-res version of a work/image on Commons under a free license and at the same time (or later) releases a higher-res version under a non-free license, we do not allow the latter to be uploaded to Commons, which had been tried already in the past. (This does not refer to reproductions of PD-old images.)
Finally, in regard to watermarks: though there has always been some controversy about removal of watermarks, until recently the general opinion on Commons was, that it's o.k. to remove watermarks from freely-licensed images, as it should be o.k. by a license, which allows creating derivatives. However, no more, at least for copyright-related watermarks, since this analysis from WMF-legal in September 2014. For a short version see Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

It is customary that artists put their name on their work and I'm convinced that Rembrandt, had he lived in a digital age, would have imprinted his name rather than paint it on his work. So why the need to remove Hammer's name from this art work? Anyway, the high-res version is not the art work that Hammer licensed so is not suited for Wikicommons in my opinion. Elfrieb (talk) 11:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I just received a message that once again there is discussion about my images (By now I regret ever uploading them because fans asked me and wished they'd ALL be removed). Let me clarify the situation about watermarks. The images WITHOUT watermarks are under the exclusive publication rights of my agent (where Hannolans downloaded it from) and the galleries he allows them to use. I am myself only allowed to publisize images WITH watermark. The image(s) without watermark are therefore not allowed on Wikicommons, not even if I myself would upload them because I would then be in breach of my agreement with my agent. Therefor the high-res image without watermark is, indeed, to be removed a.s.a.p from Wikicommons. In regard to editing the image(s) and thus removing the watermark on the edition(s) which I uploaded, I have no idea what the rules are for this on Wikicommons. But if you are so disturbed by my name as imprint just throw the image(s) out and don't use them. I really don't care anymore guys, it's only Wikicommons for me and not a platform I need for my exposure. Kind regards, Karl Hammer (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Per Karl Hammer's above statement, I've rev-deleted the high-res version without watermark to avoid possible legal problems for everybody. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
@Karl Hammer, sorry for the inconvenience. I was not aware of the differences legally between a watermarked artwork and a non-watermarked version. As Túrelio explained Commons follow several viewpoints I was not aware of. For older artwork as Rembrandt we look for the highest resolution. Thanks Túrelio for clearing this out and deleting this file. --Hannolans (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Beeldbank defensieEdit

Hey Hanno,

Ik heb een scriptje geschreven om hoge resolutie foto's uit Memorix Maior te halen, de foto-viewer die o.a. door de beeldbank van defensie wordt gebruikt. Door de code die onder "insluiten" staat te kopiëren naar Dememorixer. Zie Overzicht van beeldbanken. --Vera (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Goed om te weten! Dank voor het scriptje en voor het naar een hogere resolutie brengen van deze foto's! --Hannolans (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

File:A blind man is saved from drowning at the Veenkade.jpgEdit

 
File:A blind man is saved from drowning at the Veenkade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 14:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Beeldmerk EU-voorzitterschap 2016.jpgEdit

 
File:Beeldmerk EU-voorzitterschap 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

193.173.21.236 05:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo rijksoverheid.svgEdit

 
File:Logo rijksoverheid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

193.173.21.236 05:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Verkeerde handlesEdit

 
De Vos van Steenwijk

Eerder elders gemeld: Het klopt dat deze URL (van R.H. de Vos van Steenwijk) niet meer werkte. Nog vervelender is, dat het niet de enige verbroken link in GaHetNa is. Ik heb honderden zogenaamde "permanente" URLs overgenomen uit deze website van het Nationaal Archief, maar een deel van die links werkt niet meer, omdat ze in GaHetNa zelf inmiddels veranderd zijn. De permalinks naar ANEFO-afbeeldigen lijken allemaal nog wél te werken, maar de links naar veel andere afbeeldingen zijn verbroken. [...] Ik merkte die op grote schaal veranderde links zelf op in augustus 2015, en heb toen per email navraag gedaan bij het Nationaal Archief, maar ondanks herhaling van mijn vraag nog geen antwoord gekregen. Ik weet dus ook niet of deze links uit GaHetNa allemaal handmatig in Commons vervangen moeten worden, of dat het op een andere manier [in GaHetNa] in orde komt. Vysotsky (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

PS De handle die jij toevoegde bij De Vos van Steenwijk werkt bij mij niet. Bij jou wel? Vysotsky (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Dit is heel bijzonder. Handles zijn juist persistent en handle.net is juist een service dat waarborgt dat de urls altijd geldig blijven. Dit zou een ernstige bug zijn. --Hannolans (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Die bovenstaande handle werkt bij mij ook niet, terwijl dat wel de handle is die naast de foto als de permanente link wordt weergegeven (http://www.gahetna.nl/collectie/afbeeldingen/fotocollectie/zoeken/weergave/detail/start/0/tstart/0/q/zoekterm/Baron%20de%20Vos%20van%20Steenwijk). Er is dus echt iets gebroken met gahetna.nl en het Handle-systeem. Ik zal ook een mailtje sturen. --Hannolans (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Volgens mij werkt het nog niet, ze hadden me wel gemeld er mee bezig te zijn. --Hannolans (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Jac. de NijsEdit

Hallo Hannolans, jij hebt ooit eens de categorie Category:Photographs by Jack de Nijs aangemaakt. Hoe ben jij er achter gekomen dat hij Jack heet? Jac., zoals hij bij het Nationaal Archief genoemd wordt, is namelijk meestal een afkorting voor Jacques. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, goeie vraag. Kan me niet meer herinneren en weet ook niet of ik dit uit een betrouwbare bron heb gehaald. RKD?
EDIT: ja inderdaad RKD: https://rkd.nl/nl/explore/artists/115686 maar ook gahetna.nl "Pasfoto van fotograaf Jack de Nijs": http://proxy.handle.net/10648/ad792b64-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84
Inderdaad, bedankt. Ik had RKD ook gecontroleerd maar kennelijk alleen op Nijs, niet op Nys. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Re:BataclanEdit

Please see Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando2.jpgEdit

 
File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando.jpgEdit

 
File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Help decide the future of WikimaniaEdit

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Ellen & Derk achter de schermen bij DWDD.webmEdit

 
File:Ellen & Derk achter de schermen bij DWDD.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania resultsEdit

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Source link neededEdit

There's no source link for File:Het Sinterklaasjournaal 2015 promo 3.webm. Can you provide that link so I can review it? Thanks. INeverCry 22:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I have added the source. --Hannolans (talk) 23:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  Reviewed INeverCry 00:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Kun je de gevangenis in gaan voor het downloaden van een film (4 5).webmEdit

Hi, This file is under a standard Youtube license. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Oops, this is seems the only known of the University of the Netherlands with that license, and off course the one about copyright... --Hannolans (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Kun je de gevangenis in gaan voor het downloaden van een film (4 5).webmEdit

 
File:Kun je de gevangenis in gaan voor het downloaden van een film (4 5).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 21:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Het Sinterklaasjournaal 2015 promo 3.webmEdit

 
File:Het Sinterklaasjournaal 2015 promo 3.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Bram Moszkowicz in commercial (cropped).jpgEdit

 
File:Bram Moszkowicz in commercial (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ErikvanB (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

My sincere apologies for all the confusion. Nomination witdrawn. ErikvanB (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Charissa Freese over een veranderende arbeidsmarkt - Tilburg University.webmEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Charissa Freese over een veranderende arbeidsmarkt - Tilburg University.webm, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

INeverCry 18:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

File:When Was The Last Time Prince Watched Purple Rain Or Bought Something From an Infomercial.webmEdit

 
File:When Was The Last Time Prince Watched Purple Rain Or Bought Something From an Infomercial.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Proud User (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Video2commonsEdit

You might want to use toollabs:video2commons for converting directly from Vimeo czar 21:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Didn't know it existed! --Hannolans (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Centraal Beheer Achmea - Striptease.webmEdit

 
File:Centraal Beheer Achmea - Striptease.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Simonxag (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Haagse Harry.jpgEdit

Beste Hannolans, Ik twijfel of je de CC0 welke geldt voor de foto's op rijksoverheid.nl, tevens mag toepassen op de striptekening van Haagse Harry. Het gaat volgens mij om iets anders dan een foto die werd gemaakt in opdracht van de rijksoverheid. Misschien kan het wél indien duidelijk blijkt dat de cartoon voor- en in opdracht van de rijksoverheid is gemaakt en gepubliceerd. Je zou bij twijfel kunnen overwegen om het geval voor te leggen aan de commons community. Groet, --OSeveno (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Al het materiaal is CC0, ook tekeningen, uitgezonderd zijn foto's sinds vorig jaar gepubliceerd. De rijksoverheid koopt voor al het materiaal de licentie af in de inkoopvoorwaarden rijksoverheid. --Hannolans (talk) 21:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Dat geloof ik direct, maar het zou mooi zijn als er ook een bron kon worden gevonden die dat onderbouwt. Overigens zal je het misschien met me eens zijn dat de rijksoverheid er een rommeltje van maakt met copyrights/licenties. Introduceren ze één beleid, om er vervolgens links en rechts weer vanaf te knabbelen. Ze hadden in het kader van hun CC0 beleid beter kunnen kiezen om te stellen dat al het materiaal daaronder valt, "tenzij anders vermeld". Groet, --OSeveno (talk) 08:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
In de ARVODI staat dat het intellectueel eigendom wordt overgedragen. https://www.pianoo.nl/algemene-rijksvoorwaarden-voor-verstrekken-van-opdrachten-tot-verrichten-van-diensten-2014-arvodi-20-0 Ik ga er van uit dat de rijksoverheid hun zaken op orde heeft. In principe is het beleid voor rijksoverheid CC0 tenzij anders vermeld. Dat geldt voor tekst, audio, video en tekeningen, alleen tijdelijk niet voor foto's. Wat ik bijzonder vind is dat zij soms hun copyrightteksten en teksten aanpassen zonder daarvan melding te maken --Hannolans (talk) 01:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Carlsberg - Escape.webmEdit

 
File:Carlsberg - Escape.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 13:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Port of Amsterdam - SAIL 2015.webmEdit

 
File:Port of Amsterdam - SAIL 2015.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Nature Box (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

satin stitchEdit

Hoi Hannolans, ben aangenaam verrast met de categorie Satin Stitch die jij hebt gemaakt.... en bijzonder flink gevuld. Bedankt! Elly (talk) 20:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Naar aanleiding vna het artikel satijnsteek. Interessant dat van steken nog geen categorien zijn, want beeldmateriaal is er voldoende denk ik, bijv van textielcollecties. --Hannolans (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Er is zoveel nog niet gecategoriseerd; zojuist heb ik een categorie Cuffs aangemaakt, nav het artikel nl:Manchet (kleding) op NL wikipedia.
(P.S. ik zie hierboven iets staan over Arvodi.... ik weet het nog zo net niet, ik heb veel onder die voorwaarden gewerkt, maar ik heb het auteursrecht van mijn werk niet op die manier afgestaan, zeker niet mogen mijn rapportages zomaar gewijzigd worden..., of het logo van ons bedrijf op die rapportages.... etc.... zou wat zijn, dan kan iedereen zomaar de conclusies van je zorgvuldig opgestelde rapport verdraaien!)
Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Arvodi is verplicht, andere voorwaarden worden niet meer geaccepteerd, Daarvoor gold overigens dat alles dat de overheid publiceerde in Nederland vrij gebruikt mocht worden (dat is sinds kort beperkt tot dat van de overheid waarvan het auteursrecht bij de overheid ligt). Dat wil niet zeggen dat een rapport van de overheid verdraaid mag worden. Je mag een rapport van de overheid herpubliceren of bewerken, maar je mag een rapport niet verdraaien (morele rechten worden niet afgestaan, dus je mag niet doen alsof je de overheid of een instituut bent en de overheid een andere conclusie laten verkondigen). Arvodi overdracht van auteursrecht geldt alleen voor dat deel van het werk dat voor de overheid is gemaakt. Het logo valt er niet onder, evenals bijv stockfoto's. Dat staat ergens in de Arvodi. Wel zou de overheid dat er bij moeten zetten, want voor de eindgebruiker is dat (behalve bij logo's) natuurlijk niet duidelijk. --Hannolans (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Ik ben op wikidata de borduursteken bij elkaar aan het brengen en nu de breisteken. Dit is duidelijk een onderwerp waarin Wikipedia nog een steek laat vallen :) --Hannolans (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Rijksmuseum_Amsterdam_buildingEdit

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:2014 Nuclear Security Summit/DefensieEdit

Hi,

Ik heb altijd al wat moeite gehad met deze verwijdering. Onze premier (nou ja, hij beheert het kanaal niet zelf) wordt zomaar beschuldigd van copyrfraud en in mijn mailconversatie kreeg ik de indruk dat ze wisten wat ze deden. Best wel logisch want onze overheid heeft de nodige ervaring met auteursrecht. Zou je misschien een verzoek in willen dienen op com:UNDEL? Jij bent beter in deze materie thuis dan ik. Natuur12 (talk) 07:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Ja precies. Ik heb nog nooit een undeletion aangevraagd, maar zal een poging wagen. --Hannolans (talk) 07:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Dank! Natuur12 (talk) 07:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

ANEFOEdit

This development might interest you - though you probably already noticed. Vysotsky (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien wint de Zilveren Camera 2013.webmEdit

 
File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien wint de Zilveren Camera 2013.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 19:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Rijksmuseum.amsterdam (126) (15192324111).jpgEdit

 
File:Rijksmuseum.amsterdam (126) (15192324111).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

File:WesterborkLageplan.jpgEdit

 
File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Gerard Spong 2015.jpgEdit

 
File:Gerard Spong 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:The Wolverine Trailer Exclusive (2013).webmEdit

 
File:The Wolverine Trailer Exclusive (2013).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Drongou (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webmEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 4.webmEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 4.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 4.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mekkafeest 2.webmEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mekkafeest 2.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mekkafeest 2.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi Hannolans, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/− lNeverCry 04:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:(1-5) Hoe bepaal jij met wie jij wel of niet gaat daten-.webmEdit

 
File:(1-5) Hoe bepaal jij met wie jij wel of niet gaat daten-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

lNeverCry 02:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

File:(3-5) Waarom willen sommige mensen dood-.webmEdit

 
File:(3-5) Waarom willen sommige mensen dood-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

lNeverCry 02:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Hannolans/archive".