Last modified on 23 January 2015, at 22:21

User talk:Ainali

English: Welcome to the Commons, Ainali!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Manecke 21:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token 9b9f84dc7ec7650abc2934a02aaa522eEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:POTDEdit

Idén med den omdirigeringen var att visa att det är möjligt att ha en omdirigering som leder till Dagens bild. På så sätt ska det vara möjligt att inkludera Dagens bild från Commons på andra projekt. För att det ska fungera måste omdirigeringen leda till en bild. Helst skulle någon robot uppdatera omdirigeringen dagligen, men som exempel fungerar länken även om den visar en gammal dagens bild. /Ö 20:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Aha! Tack för förklaringen, det var faktiskt mitt sökande efter en sådan funktion som ledde att jag hamnade där. /Ainali (talk) 18:20, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Hallsbergs tågstation.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hallsberg rail station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Pending permission for image(s)Edit

Hello. On following images, you have added the {{otrs pending}} template:


Unfortunately, after conducting a search, I could not locate the ticket containing the permission to use the image. Please respond on my talk page if you have the ticket number, or if you would like to send me the permission. Please note that if you do not respond, the image may be deleted. Thanks! Rjd0060 (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. The image has been deleted. If you end up getting the permission, you can let me know and we can see about restoring it. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 20:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Skapade kategoriEdit

Jag skapade kategorin Gothenburg Book Fair 2008, där vi kan samla bilderna.//Hannibal (talk) 08:38, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token d2f46cca1c2912938eb2157ea1eb1c71Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Ainali!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Re:Double CategoriesEdit

Hey, thanks for helping me out with my mistake! I have one question for you: when I look in the categories at Wikimedia where I have put the different photos I have uploaded, I do not find them there? Why? EriFr (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

They are now in subcategories, for example, File:Karlstad Cathedral.JPG is in Category:Karlstads domkyrka. If you want to see all your uploaded pictures and what categories they are in you can look here. --Ainali (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Brochure A5 4 pages v2.33 en.pdfEdit

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Broschyr A5 4 sidor v2.25.pdfEdit

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Tessinparken från bron.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Tessinparken vid valhallavägen.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


File:St Eriksplan.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


File:Humleblomster.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


File:TågIBergslagen.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:HoforsStationSE.JPGEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:HoforsStationSE.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

abf «Cabale!» 21:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

VI scopeEdit

Hello Jan!
Your VI nomination scope has fixed now. Look it as example for future nominations.
With best regards, George.
George Chernilevsky talk 15:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I read it before I strated, but forgot to fix it while actually doing the nomination. --Ainali (talk) 15:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Storviks gamla brandstation.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


File:Stensätra kyrka.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


File:GöranssonArena01.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


File:SwedishRoyalWeddingBrideAndGroomLeavesOnABoat full.ogvEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wedding of Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden, and Daniel Westling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Polish of backgroundEdit

Hello, I saw that you did a nice polish on this photo on Caster Semeya (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20090819_Caster_Semenya_polished.JPG). Do you think it is possible to do the same with the picture of Anna Bergendahl (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anna_Bergendahl3_%28cropped%29.jpg). It's not so good that it is advertising for Media Markt, in the background, but perhaps all the hair makes it complicated. Athyllis (talk) 19:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't the one doing the good polishing, it was User:Harlock81. I merely fixed the categories. --Ainali (talk) 19:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Athyllis (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Humleblomster.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Humleblomster.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Torsåker kyrka01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torsåker kyrka01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

MRI-Philips.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

KategoriseringarEdit

Hej! Jag upptäckte att du har börjat med att kategorisera bilderserier efter årtal som "Category:2009 in Stigbergsgatan". Det är mycket opraktiskt eftersom det blir omståndligt att plocka in fler bilder från senare tid där. Eller vill du ha en kategori på Sigbergsgatan för varje år? Jag tycker att "Stigbergsgatan" (som exempel) räcker som kategori, då får man allt sammlat på samma sida. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Stigbergsgatan kanske var lite väl nedbrutet, annars verkar det vara praxis att göra så på städer. Jag tror att det gjorde så för att det ändå var rätt många bilder där. Ändra gärna tillbaks om du tycker att det var otympligt. --Ainali (talk) 11:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Städer är ju ok, men gator blir för nedbrutet och frågan är även "vad är rätt många bilder", när ska årtal vara en egen kategori? Med 3, 5 eller 10 bilder? Jag vet inte. För att få en överblick över ett motiv måste man ju leta på flera ställen, det tycker jag är en klar nackdel. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Gammelstilla bruk vit puts på hus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gammelstilla bruk vit puts på hus.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Skomarhyttan02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skomarhyttan02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Storviks station.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storviks station.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:VänsterpartietEdit

Hello Jan,

I wanted to let you know that I drafted a project page about the pictures of the Vänsterpartiet that were donated to Wikimedia Sverige : Commons:Vänsterpartiet.

I was merely based on a machine translation of Wikimedia Sverige blogpost, so I am totally not sure I got everything right. It would be great if you could review it to add the relevant missing information and correct mistakes.

Congratulations for this project! Us folks at Wikimédia France closely follow what other chapters are up to, and we (at least I :-) get all fired up when hearing about such a story!

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 00:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the initiative. You did a really good job translating this! --Ainali (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Eskilstorpsdösen närbild.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eskilstorpsdösen närbild.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Eskilstorpsdösen mot havet.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eskilstorpsdösen mot havet.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Eskilstorpsdösen med informationsskylt.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eskilstorpsdösen med informationsskylt.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Västra Ingelstads kyrka 2010 - 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västra Ingelstads kyrka 2010 - 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Jens Liljestrand 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jens Liljestrand 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Leksands kyrka 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leksands kyrka 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Corvus monedula portrait.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corvus monedula portrait.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:CloudberryA5Front.jpgEdit

Hi Ainali, did you also shoot the background image in File:CloudberryA5Front.jpg or was it taken from another image on Commons? --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello, the background is File:Swedish länsväg 276 20090624 001.jpg which I did not shoot. I added it in the source field. Is that the way to do it right? --Ainali (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Fel sidaEdit

Tror det här meddelandet hamnade på fel ställe.--ArildV (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Det har du rätt i. Tack för att du tipsade! --Ainali (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Jag tror även att detta meddelande blivit fel. Troligen syftades det på en annan bild då User:Catasa fick ett identiskt meddelande. /Lokal_Profil 21:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Det stämmer, nu har jag fixat det, tack för hjälpen! --Ainali (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Real Life Barnstar.jpg The Real Life Barnstar
För det imponerade arbetet med att gå igenom över 5000 bilder och hitta 10 riktiga guldkorn bland alla fina bilder! ArildV (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Tack! Det var jobbigt, men också väldigt roligt att se hur många nya bra bilder som har kommit in. --Ainali (talk) 21:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Personality_rights/svEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Personality_rights/sv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

24.136.32.226 20:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Mastigt galleriEdit

Hejsan! Programvaran börjar få problem med ditt galleri. Det har tydligen blivit för mycket mallkod att inkludera och/eller för mycket resurskrävande saker, se exempelvis kategorierna det har hamnat i. En lösning kanske är att dela upp på två eller flera sidor? ~/gallery ser ut att vara automatgenerat av något (Commonist?) så det enklaste kanske är att lyfta ut en del till exvis gallery2009, gallery2010 osv? Hälsningar --MagnusA (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Det var värst, jag ska arkivera på något sätt. Hur fick du reda på detta? --Ainali (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, vi tomtar tassar omkring lite överallt och kikar in i olika vrår. Just detta hittade jag när jag tittade in i ovan nämnda kategorier av någon anledning och fick syn på ett namn jag kände igen. :-) Imponerande mängd fotografier! Och bra sådana! --MagnusA (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Sådär, nu har jag splittat det på årsvis, det borde göra dem lite lättare. --Ainali (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jonas Sjöstedt 2.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jonas Sjöstedt 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Reckless182 (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

That image and the rest in this category was part of an image donation initiated by Wikimedia Sverige. --Ainali (talk) 07:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your photo in the WMF annual reportEdit

Hi Jan,

one of your photos has been used in the recently published annual report of the Wikimedia Foundation. Printed copies of the report have since become available, and we would be happy to send you one as a thank-you for your work - let me know your postal address by email if you would like us to do so!

Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 01:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the message! Yes, I would be very glad if you sent me a copy. I'll email you my postal address. Ainali (talk) 14:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiev monument 140.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mallar för Teknikpoolen och Gemenskapens projektEdit

De två mallarna för Wikimedia Sveriges egna projekt tycker jag inte är riktigt samma sak som partnerskap med Wikimedia-oberoende institutioner som museer, bibiotek och arkiv. De är mer jämförbara med mallar som Template:Supported by Wikimedia Polska som har mer rimlig bildstorlek. Även om projkten ska räknas som partnerskap så är det bara Wikimedia France som också har sin logga i partnerskapsmallarna och då i mindre storlek än vad Wikimedia Sveriges logga är nu.
(Jag tycker att många av partnerskapsmallarna också har onödigt stora bilder som gärna kan göras mindre. Men det är en diskussion för någon annan plats. ) /Ö 10:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Ah, ja det är en vettig synpunkt. Du får gärna göra min redigering ogjord. Ainali (talk) 11:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

EXIF data questionEdit

Hi, just a question about the lack of EXIF data in some of the photos you are submitting via the WLM Android App. If you don't mind, we'd like to know why EXIF data is missing - this is just to understand how the app is being used. Feel free to email me at pchang at wikimedia dot org. Thank you. --Philinje (talk) 18:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I would love to help! Which images are you refering to? Ainali (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Ainali,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token c7029961c3a79f90cbb32aee65a2334cEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! (And a little bit sad I forgot the password to my exisiting one).

TUSC token c55f508ec2affe8e074e5b555b3aa33cEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! (and still lousy to remember my password :(((( )

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

SNAGOV MONASTERYEdit

YOUR IMAGE: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snagov_Kloster.JPG

IS NOT FROM SNAGOV MONASTERY http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Snagov_monastery

BUT FROM CALDARUSANI MONASTERY http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:C%C4%83ld%C4%83ru%C8%99ani_monastery

PLEASE CHANGE THE TITLE!!!

Hey, calm down with the caps lock and triple exlamations marks. This is not you average internet forum, we are contributing to the sum of all human knowledge, please try to be civil. Thanks though for the pointer, I have now moved the image and apologize for my misconception about where I took the photo. Ainali (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Please accept my apology, the image was used in many pages and I wanted to correct the error as soon as possible, but my message was impolite. Fusionofhorizons 23:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kiev monument 140.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kiev monument 140.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DS (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Ainali/gallery 2009Edit

Hi Ainali, wanted to let you know your gallery is in a mess right now. You might go and have a look at it. :)Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks but I do not really see it as a "mess". The gallery is autogenerated by Commonist and the failed uploads serves as a good reminder to me. Ainali (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Oh, then it is okay of course. :) Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Ainali,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 13:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:FMTM 10 830 - 11143.pdfEdit

Det står att det är du som skapat denna fil, men den verkar ha skapats av Försvarsmakten istället, så ditt val av licens verkar inte giltigt. Den här typen av dokument omfattas väl av {{PD-Sweden-URL9}}? --Stefan4 (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Helt rätt, jag letade efter en sådan mall men kunde inte hitta vid tillfället. Jag har rättat det nu, tack för hjälpen! Ainali (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Se COM:UR#File:FMTM 10 830 - 11143.pdf för en diskussion om filen. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Tack för tipset! --Ainali (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Ainali,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wikiEdit

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Ainali,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Pistas de deporte.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pistas de deporte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 00:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Residencia escolar rancho de colores.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Residencia escolar rancho de colores.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 00:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Fysik B och elektriska fält, del 1 Vad vi redan vet.webmEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fysik B och elektriska fält, del 1 Vad vi redan vet.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Österbybruk 2012 10.JPGEdit

Hi Ainali.

In the category is the following description:

Time 13:37: clocks and watches displaying the time 13:37 (1:37 pm). 12-hour clocks are categorized in category:Time 01:37

File:Österbybruk 2012 10.JPG is a 12-hour clock

Greets --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  21:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, just because there is a description does not make you free from responsibility of using common sense. I started a discussion here. If you have any substantial arguments, please state them there. Ainali (talk) 21:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.


GLAMwiki toolsetEdit

Hi Ainali,

Congratulations on becoming a user of the GLAMwiki Toolset. You can find some frequently asked questions and helpful links for using the tool at GLAMwiki Toolset. As your first step, please add yourself to the list of users at GWToolset users and follow the good practice of creating pages explaining your new projects, as these can help create a focus for our wider community of volunteers. A standard place to set up a project page is at Batch uploading, though long term GLAM programmes may fall under GLAM. To discuss the tool with fellow users, please join the email list GLAMtools or try chatting at #wikimedia-commons webchat. SteinsplitterBot (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Videos on Turkish Wikipedia articlesEdit

Hello Ainali! I have left a message for you on Turkish Wikipedia. Please take a look at it whenever you can. Thanks! --WikiBronze [T] 20:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice! I answered you there. --Ainali (talk) 20:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Keitele kirkko 7.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Keitele kirkko 7.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Apalsola tc 17:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Keitele kirkko 11.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Keitele kirkko 11.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Apalsola tc

Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen!Edit

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.

Hej Ainali,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.

I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.

Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!

Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige

Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC).

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thanks for all your help tagging maps in the Mechanical Curator collection - after ten days, we've now done half the books and found 10,600 images! Andrew Gray (talk) 00:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User BG-4}}Edit

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 00:36, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

BG-4

Project on Swedish WikipediaEdit

Hi Jan, I have a bit more to say stemming from this discussion, but beyond the scope of the files being discussed there. (I'm not certain, but guessing that you have a formal or informal advisory role in the Swedish project, so I'm hoping this is helpful; if I'm mistaken, please feel free to disregard.)

You mentioned that [[Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Martinstrandberg |the files previously deleted]] were uploaded by a professional, and part of a project on Swedish Wikipedia. This is worthwhile information; but on reviewing the circumstances, I am wondering how anybody curating content on Commons (or any reader wanting to reuse the photos) would know this? The user account in question is a redlink (no content) both here and on Swedish Wikipedia; his global contributions show no activity prior to December 2014; and the file pages in question (at least, if the remaining one is representative) carried no tag, in Swedish or any language, describing the project.

I'd suggest, with a project like this, that special attention be given to setting up the user account, and templates for the files. This would make it easier for others to help a user get all the details right, and at least in many cases, avoid the need for deletion requests or other hassles. -Pete F (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

I was only an informal advisory in the beginning of the project, but thought it to be trivial and did not notice it again before images were deleted on Swedish Wikipedia. You are absolutely right that the information supplied by the uploader on Commons were sparse, to say the least. I guess that the only way to have figured it out was to see that the files already were in use on Wikipedia. Should not such a check be common practise if the deletion request is based upon scope? Ainali (talk) 08:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm not an admin (and it might be good to confirm with one), but my understanding from the various deletion reviews I've worked on is this:
  • Use on another wiki is generally considered to automatically establish that an image or media file is in scope
  • Use on another wiki is not considered in establishing more fundamental questions, i.e. whether a file meets Commons' standards (and the standards established by the WMF Board) for protecting the rights of copyright holders, or the personality rights of those depicted.
That's my understanding of the general practice. It seems to me that is the way it should be handled for a central repository, because it's important that people wishing to reuse the files have access to that information.
That approach is endorsed by the COM:IDENT guideline, which requires that the uploader make an assertion on Commons that appropriate permission has been given. If that information isn't]] given on the file's page, how could a potential reuser -- who might not have any familiarity with how wikis work -- be expected to find it?
I do think theses processes can and should be more clearly documented, and it's something I plan to put more work into. Glad for this reminder of how important it is to do that. -Pete F (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I agree with you. The strange thing is, the deletion request was SCOPE, not COM:IDENT. And that was the thing that was new to me. Ainali (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Both "private image" (which relates to COM:IDENT) and "scope" were mentioned in the nomination, but "private image" is the part that was mentioned by closing administrator Ellin Beltz. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Martinstrandberg So I think COM:IDENT was the actual justification even though COM:SCOPE had been mentioned. -Pete F (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
(And in my opinion, it's not worth worrying too much about an inaccurate nomination so long as the closure is appropriate. Lots of people miss things when making the initial nom, that's why there is a closer to double-check.) -Pete F (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Sure, it was a fuzzy nomination. "Private images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope." Is it three reasons or one? Since 2 and 3 obviously relate, i read the commas as "therefor" and hence interpreted it as one single reason. Ainali (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, good point. And makes me realize, probably worth pinging Ies. With that, though, maybe we have beaten this dead horse enough for now :) -Pete F (talk) 07:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Greetings: As a deletion editor (mentioned above) perhaps I can muddy the clarity here a little more... The images that I closed were family snaps of horrid quality, overexposed, bad colors and fuzzy. This was somehow used to justify Images from the archive of UNESCO deletion nomination of high quality images of people unrelated to the photographer. I don't see a single connection between the two. It is common in DN's to say "out of COM:SCOPE/ lack of educational utility." That is the particular Sub-section of SCOPE being cited. I don't see a problem with reversing it either, "no educational utility, out of Scope" means exactly the same thing. There was nothing fuzzy about the nomination: the images themselves were fuzzy. They were blurry overexposed useless private family snaps, unused and thus out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational utility. I really don't understand the tempest in this teapot at all, can anyone enlighten me? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The images were not family snaps, they were taken by a professional photographer in staged situations. It was clear for all involved from the beginning that they were to be used to illustrate life in Helsingborg municipality. The images were not unused at the time of deletion. If they were deleted because of bad quality that would have been a useful comment in the closing of the deletion request. Ainali (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
If indeed the photos were are useful to Swedish Wikipedia, and if the appropriate permission was granted, it seems like an undeletion request would be the way to go -- no? -Pete F (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I do not know. The way to go might depend on how welcoming you like Commons to be like. Ainali (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Ainali".