Open main menu

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →


About the file you deleted

Hi ,

You've deleted the file [[1]] because of a copyright violation.
These set of Windows 8.1 photographs are important for the wikibook. Anyway , I do not see much reason as to why should these photos be deleted. Is it because I used the wrong license?
Or , is it that Microsoft screenshots cannot be uploaded?
Thank you. --Leaderboard (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Leaderboard. Microsoft software are copyrighted. You can't upload screenshots of non-free content on Commons (see Commons:Screenshots#Microsoft_products). Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Can I use the license in this file instead? Or is it Wikipedia-only?
w:en:File:Vista-visual-styles-comparison.png--Leaderboard (talk) 12:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
No, it's Wikipedia-only, see Commons:Fair use. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Is there any option for local uploads(English WIkibooks)? The page there seems to allow it. --Leaderboard (talk) 12:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Leaderboard : You can upload non-free content on the English Wikibooks under certain conditions. See wikibooks:en:Help:Files. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Now that I've got uploader permissions , is there any way to transfer the images from Wikimedia Commons to Wikibooks?--Leaderboard (talk) 12:47, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
@Leaderboard: I don't think there is. You have to do it manually. Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Google Translate

Google Translate a crée "gibberish", certainement, mais ma propre Francais a plus de gibberish que Google! Je n'etude pas de la Francais depuis vingt ans, alor on doit prefere la translation automatique. ;-)

...but thank you for your translation anyway! Yes, Google Translate is okay for simple text, but I have no doubt it mangled the subtle aspects of what I was trying to explain. Particularly as even the original English was longwinded and badly-written. All the best, Ubcule (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

The Resurrection (fixed?)

Hi, thank you for the notification to send an e-mail for permission on my art work The Resurrection. I just did as required and hope the issue is solved. Best regards,

Karl Hammer (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

Hi Thibaut120094,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

English | മലയാളം | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Didym (talk) 22:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:141020 ECO logo accessibility.jpg

We use CC license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike, CC BY-NC-SA , as specified in pag. 21 in the document IPR, security and privacy report

--Tfeliz (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

@Tfeliz Hello, i saw your message, unfortunately, you can't upload content under a CC BY-NC-SA licence on Commons, see Commons:Licencing. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
@Thibaut120094 Alors, je l'enlève. Je ne peux pas changer cet accord entre les partenaires. Pas de problème. Tfeliz (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Bikes riding north on Biscayne, 1940s.png

You caught that while I was sidetracked talking about the broken Virgin Airlines plane in London, fixed it while I had the edit window open, lol. Revent (talk) 23:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


Hallo Thibaut, You, criticed yesterday the adjustment of my photo of the balinese temple.
1.) I never make spaces in the name of my pictures, but when You insist of spaces - make them!
2.) I am shure, that this was not Pura Luhur, but Pura Batur!
Friendly --Ziegler175 (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I just asked you to double-check your request, since the new name didn't have spaces and was unintelligible compared to the old name, it's Pura Batur, not PuraBatur. Anyway, it's done. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

re: Rebecca Guay images

Noted, have contacted the author to send written consent of use to OTRS ( -Object404 (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, thank you, please don't remove the {{npd}} template in the meantime. Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey Thibaut. Please don't remove her terms of use when restoring {{npd}} tags. Thanks. -Object404 (talk) 21:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Nom de code novembre

Franchement, c'est simplement un fond de couleur orange. Comment veux tu que ce soit copyrighté. D’ailleurs ta demande à été rejetée, alors arrête de t’acharner. --Wacky25 (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Si tu as des commentaires à faire, merci de les faire sur la page de débat et de ne pas retirer le modèle tant que le débat est en cours. Puis je ne suis pas la même personne qui a ouvert le précédent DR. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

completely meaningless

As you moved this file; could you explain to me your understanding of the term completely meaningless? ...Sicherlich talk 12:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, it's one of the generic criteria of COM:FR chose by the person who made the renaming request, I should have changed this. The IP wanted to add the Polish name of the region?/station? so I accepted the request. Apparently "Wojcieszów Górny" means "Upper Wojcieszów", when "Kauffung" only means "Wojcieszów" in German, and it seems to match the Polish Wikipedia article. Anyway, if you think I was wrong, then please add {{rename}} and I will rename the file again. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Thx. As you agree that it was not correct I don't see much reason to make a fuss :) - but actually Wojcieszów Górny is just the name of the station so Kauffung Bahnhof has the same meaning (the additional stacja is just repeating, no clarification or anything at all). ... best regards ...Sicherlich talk 10:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Thibaut120094, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! 1989 16:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

  Hello, Thibaut120094. You have new messages at Aulyp's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Suzuki RMZ files

Sorry, it was my mistake. I was sure that the licenses were right. Too sure. Now I've asked the author if he's available to change the attribution to CC BY-SA in order to set them useful on Wikimedia projects. I'm waiting for a reply. Sorry again.--StefBiondo 09:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Andrey Dmitriev

[2] Photos taken from the site is not Flickr, but from the forum The size of uploaded photos is the same size as the photos on the forum, and not on Flickr. What does it matter whether zzuka (Андрей Дмитриев/Andrey Dmitriev) photos published anywhere else except the forum, if the forum they have a free license and photos have been uploaded to the forum? --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, how i was supposed to know that zzuka is Andrey Dmitriev ? If he agrees to license his photos with a CC-BY-SA license, why the license on his Flickr account is "All rights reserved" ? Anyway, next time, please link his message on the permission field with a message in English, so we can know who he is and he agrees to license his photos with a CC-BY-SA license. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Probably because I asked him to share his photos on the forum, not on Flickr (I did not know that he has a profile on Flickr). Ok. And you can recover files that have been removed
File:Замалёўкі Мінска 50.jpg
File:Замалёўкі Мінска 22.jpg
File:Замалёўкі Мінска 16.jpg? --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 17:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry I can't restore the files, I don't have sysop rights. You can ask the sysop who deleted the files : User:Taivo or create a request on Commons:Undeletion requests. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

I uploaded some pictures

...but I now realize these three pictures might not have the appropriate "Creative Common" tags, File:Girls' Generation in August 2014 (01).jpg, File:Girls' Generation in August 2014 (02).jpg, and File:Girls' Generation in August 2014 (03).jpg. Please help me check or delete them. My first time uploading pictures. Thank you. :)--TerryAlex (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

I nominated the pictures myself already. Thank you. :)--TerryAlex (talk) 23:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
@TerryAlex: Well that's a shame because the license on the blog was {{Cc-by-4.0}} if i remember correctly. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I thought those pictures are beautifully shot, but the page itself does not have any "Creative Common" tag 1, so I was not sure if it was appropriate. Some of the other pages within that site does have one (such as this one 2). Does it apply to the website as a whole or only individual pages? Let me know, because I'm still new to this. I would love to have the pictures reuploaded.--TerryAlex (talk) 16:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Images des œuvres de Max Boucher

Bonjour Thibaut.

Merci de votre travail soigneux.

Mais je veux vous indiquer certains faits importants concernant les images que j'ai téléchargées des œuvres de Max Boucher:
( )

4 File tagging File:Christ du Collège de Matane – 1960.jpg
5 File tagging File:Christ du Collège de Matane – 1960 (HD).jpg
6 File tagging File:Vierge à l'enfant – Max Boucher.jpg
7 File tagging File:Mère et Enfant 1957.jpg
8 File tagging File:Christ du Collège de Joliette – 1961.jpg
9 File tagging File:La Tragédie – 1948.jpg
10 File tagging File:Hommage à Bach – 1971.jpg
11 File tagging File:Hommage à Brahms – 1965.jpg
12 File tagging File:La Cathédrale – 1970.jpg
13 File tagging File:Matin-d'Automne – 1970.jpg
14 File tagging File:Concaves et Convexes – 1971.jpg

Ces images proviennent d'un livre écrit par Mr Pageau, et publiées à compte d'auteur. Ce livre n'a pas de numéro ISBN. Le photographe est mort depuis longtemps… Je suis en contact avec l'auteur, Mr Pageau, c.s.v., qui est très âgé, et souhaite seulement que l'on redécouvre l'artiste qui était son ami. Il m'a donné la permission verbale d'utiliser tout le matériel de son livre. Je dois le rencontrer vendredi et je vais lui expliquer la situation. Je ne crois pas qu'il utilise l'internet… Serait-il pour vous satisfaisant que je lui demande de signer une letttre m'autorisant à utiliser les images de son livre? TOUTES les images? Car il y en a d'autres que je voudrai éventuellement ajouter. Je pourrai alors la numériser et faire parvenir. Cela conviendrait-il?

2 File source is not properly indicated: File:Sans titre – Max Boucher.jpg

Cette toile a été volée et a disparu. J'ai obtenu en 2012 une rare image sur un site web où la police de Joliette annonçait sa disparition et demandait aux citoyens de l'aider à la retrouver. Cette image a disparu, et il sera bien entendu impossible de photographier de nouveau cette toile… L'image n'appartient vraiment à personne car elle était dans le domaine public. Je ne pourrai bien sûr jamais obtenir de permission pour cette image, mais je crois important de la publier AU CAS où cela pourrait aider à la retrouver!

1 File source is not properly indicated: File:Notre-Dame des Écoles – Max Boucher – 1954.jpg
3 File tagging File:Notre-Dame des Écoles – Max Boucher – 1954.jpg

Images privées qui m'ont été données par Mr Réjean Olivier. Il ne sait plus qui les a prises… Il m'est donc impossble d'obtenir une permission pour les utiliser! Je ne sais pas quoi faire…

Merci pour votre aide.

--Fdboucher (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Je l'ai retrouvée!
Voici d'où provient l'image de la toile volée:
N'est-elle pas dans le domaine public, puisqu'il s'agit d'un avis de recherche? On lit bien: © Photo gracieuseté
--Fdboucher (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour Fdboucher, pour qu'une photo soit dans le domaine public au Canada, il faut que la photo ait été prise avant le 1er janvier 1949 ou que le photographe soit décédé y a plus de 50 ans. Pour ce qui est de la toile de Max Boucher, Max Boucher est décédé en 1975 et donc malheureusement la toile n'est pas dans le domaine public. Mais je peux me tromper, je vous conseille de vous adresser au Commons:Bistro où des gens plus expérimentés que moi pourront vous répondre. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
OK Merci. Je vais demander des précisions. Car je me demande à ce point si c'est la PHOTO de l'œuvre qui est protégée,
ou l'œuvre elle-même! Ce serait vraiment très dommage que l'on ne puisse même pas MONTRER l'œuvre d'un artiste
sous prétexte de droits d'auteurs! Quel DROIT a donc un auteur dont on ne peut VOIR les œuvres??!!! Je vous le demande…
En tous cas, merci pour votre aide… j'en apprend tous les jours ici!
--Fdboucher (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Pour les œuvres sculpturales, ceci devrait suffire, non?:
The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under s. 32.2(1)(b) of the Copyright Act (Canada), which states:
32.2 (1) It is not an infringement of copyright...
(b) for any person to reproduce, in a painting, drawing, engraving, photograph or cinematographic work
(i) an architectural work, provided the copy is not in the nature of an architectural drawing or plan, or
(ii) a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship or a cast or model of a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, that is permanently situated in a public place or building
This freedom does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters, signs or other flat artworks. See Commons:Freedom of :::::Panorama#Canada for more information.
--Fdboucher (talk) 02:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
@Fdboucher: Oui mais il faut quand même que vous ayez l'autorisation de celui qui a photographié la sculture. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
@Thibaut120094 Désolé, mais ces règles sont objectivement ABSURDES! …absolument ridicules en 2015… Je vous invite à lire Lawrence Lessig, un professeur de droit de Stanford, qui offre des idées modernes sur les concepts de copyright au siècle de wikipedia et de YouTube, et qui explique comment les règles actuelles nuisent sérieusement à la communication et à la créativité….
Je ne peux pas vous empêcher de détruire les images que j'ai téléchargées, mais je ne serai certes pas le seul à y perdre: l'auteur même des œuvres, Max Boucher, restera dans l'ombre; la communauté des Clercs de Saint-Viateur, dont il faisait partie, sera déçue de manquer une occasion de mieux faire connaître leur terreau créatif fertile, et de rappeler au monde la mémoire d'un artiste émérite de leur communauté. Quant à moi, ce sera bien la dernière fois que j'écrirai quoi que ce soit dans Wikipedia, alors que j'avais plein de projets, le prochain étant de mieux faire connaître au monde un autre très grand créateur issu des C.S.V, le père Wilfrid Corbeil.
Qui va y gagner? PERSONNE! Parce que, imaginez-vous donc, il n'existe pas dans le monde une veuve du photographe de Max Boucher écumant les sites de wikimedia à la recherche de photos affichées impunément sans license de reproduction qui devraient lui rapporter des millions quelques dollars… ni de petits-enfants affamés par l'abus des droits de leur grand-papa…
Moi non plus je n'y gagnerai rien: je me barre, et je vais retirer de wikipedia tous mes textes et images. On ne peut décrire un sculpteur sans montrer ses œuvres! Et de plus, dites donc: j'ai moi aussi des droits sur ce que j'écris!
...niaiseries… :-(
--Fdboucher (talk) 00:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour, désolé mais ce n'est pas moi qui fait les règles, si ça tenait qu'à moi, j'aurais laissé les images. Merci pour les liens j'y jetterai un coup d'œil. Bonne continuation. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


Please delete File:Crown princess wedding.PNG--Hipposcrashed (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission

Hello there, I recently uploaded several pictures from tistory because I saw the little "person" icon at the end of the page. Isn't that an indication for (CC BY 4.0)? Because one of my uploads File:Tiffany in March 2014 (01).jpg has just been tagged for deletion, so I wanna know. I'm still new to this. Thanks. If they are not allowed, then I will tag them for deletion myself.--TerryAlex (talk) 16:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, yes the little person icon means CC-BY, and links to the CC-BY 4.0 license on Creative Commons website, so it's good. I removed the tag. When you upload photos from tistory, please also add {{Licensereview}}. Thanks! Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Ah, thank you. I saw pictures being reviewed, so I've been waiting for that. Will do right now.:)--TerryAlex (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Another question, the CC license only applies to individual pages, and not the whole website right? Thanks :)--TerryAlex (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I think it only applies to individual pages. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


Bonjour, it looks like you have tried to get rid of the "option". Please don't change the template. If you want to avoid the standard/default option setting for some files, specify e.g. opt=<nowiki/>. You may overwrite it as well in {{InvalidSVG}}. Merci -- sarang사랑 16:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

@Sarang: No, I was trying to get rid of this. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for thanks

Curiously having made this edit, the removed details still appear in the transcluded template at COM:LR and at the various language versions, and at CAT:FLICKR which I use a lot. Yes I have purged all those pages in my browser. Any ideas why those removed details still appear? Ww2censor (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

No idea... Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Re:Problemi con File:Maria SS dei Miracoli - ALCAMO processione 2010 199.JPG

@Thibaut120094: The file is taken from as described in the file. In particular from At the end of that page is written: "Copyleft © 2015 Trapani Nostra - Il contenuto di questo sito può essere liberamente riutilizzato citandone la fonte salvo per quelli a questo sito concessi e coperti da copyright". It means that it is in the public domain (=copyleft) and can be used citing the source. I had also contacted the webmaster of the website (Lorenzo Gigante) to confirm that I can use those pictures because he took by his camera and they have copyleft. Please let me know if my explanation is clear and satisfactory. Thanks. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

@Daniele Pugliesi: Oh sorry, I didn't see the "Copyleft", but please put the complete URL of the article so we can verify that the photo comes from this website, thanks! Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Edits to userboxes

Hello there! Regarding the edits on various userboxes, such as Template:User VG-1‎, would you please mind to provide an explanation instead of reverting as if they were vandalisms? Thank you. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 09:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Never heard the word ‘consensus’? Please discuss first before making any changes on userboxes templates, thank you! You're not the only user using those userboxes. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I've heard it before, but reverting with no explanation simply doesn't encourage discussion. Your fault, sorry. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 09:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Ok, so why do you find that specifying the font size as 1.5em isn't an improvement? That makes userboxes better adjustable to various screen sizes and pixel densities, what 13.8pt doesn't provide. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 10:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Because on some screens, it looks like this. It's not consistency for me. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Hm, that's a good point. Maybe we could go with 1.2em instead, or use some CSS trickery in form of white-space: nowrap;? As we know, even using 13.8pt doesn't guarantee that it won't be wrapped on some screens, as it depends on the available font selection, rendering performed by the browser, etc. However, it would be the best to modify Template:BUser template a bit (its TemplateBUserImgText CSS class, to be precise), so 45px isn't the only thing that determines how wide is the left "box". — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Request for help

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rade de Genève 2010-10-02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Ceará River.png

Can you please explain what's happening? Nakinn 23:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Is there a rule saying I can only make an undeletion request and not recreate it? If yes, I want to read, please. Why I wasn't notified on my talk page about the speedy delete? I proved the ownership to an administrator, so why the speedy delete? Nakinn 23:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
And sorry for making a mess at Ceará River.png. As you can see, I am struggling and understanding absolutely nothing in all this. Nakinn 23:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Stop edit war

You may use {{SVG}} or {{svg}}, but {{ToSVG}} is in deletion. Sorry sarang사랑 09:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

@Sarang: Like I said in the edit summary I don't see any DR, you must reach a consensus on the talk page before making any changes on templates. Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
The DR cannot be started before all transclusions are led to the remaining templates. Peut être aujourd'hui. Merci sarang사랑 10:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


I recently uploaded some pictures but a few of them got deleted (although they passed license review), because Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Photos from, but I contacted the owners on their twitter and they are okay with them as long as proper credits are given, so what I should I do to indicate that the pictures are permission-ed? Thanks so much :) --TerryAlex (talk) 20:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Usage libre à condition que l'on donne notre autorisation


Le type de licence spécifique appliquée ici, ic ou ici me semble simplement être un "all rights reserved", non ? Ou est-ce que je me trompe à ce sujet ? J'ai des doutes ...

Scoopfinder(d) 03:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Scoopfinder. T'a tout à fait raison, il est bien marqué dans la doc du modèle {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} que les conditions doivent être compatibles avec COM:Licensing, or là ce n'est pas le cas, "demander notre autorisation écrite avant" n'est pas accepté ici.
Je pense que tu devrais ouvrir une DR groupée, je te laisse le faire, tu maitrises mieux l'anglais que moi  .
Par contre j'ai un doute pour les deux premiers fichiers, tu crois qu'ils atteignent le seuil de COM:TOO ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, le second pour sûr et le premier très probablement. C'était surtout pour l'exemple et illustrer ma question  . Thx mate ! --Scoopfinder(d) 11:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


C'est le temps pour moi de faire une pause ! Cordialement :) --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Thibaut120094. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

About the Picture you removed.

Hi there, I was wondering to find out the reason why you deleted the image Mehfil Magazine.jpg on 28 Feb 2015. The image is a cover of a Canadian Magazine called "Mehfil Magazine". And I was trying to add that cover image to their Wikipedia page at Mehfil Magazine. They are the original owners of this image and they want their Magazine cover to be displayed on the Wikipedia article. So, they are totally fine with releasing the image in public for free, free for usage or editing. So I don't know how this could be violation of copyright laws. Could you please help me here.

Thanks and Regards. Steve Mattu (talk) 01:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC) 2nd March, Steve Mattu.

Hi Steve Mattu, please ask Mehfil Magazine to send their permission to the OTRS team. Thanks ! Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

And wouldn't it be easy and fast if I just tell them to upload the same picture (cover image)? What will be needed if we do that? Thanks. Steve Mattu (talk) March 5 2015

No that would be the same, we still need proof of permission from them coming from a magazine email address to the OTRS team. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Files you marked for deletion

and File:JeffersonPinder Revival(ayo).png, File:JeffersonPinder InvisibleMan.jpg

^^^ the owner of the images sent a message this AM to declaring full consent. do you know how long it will take for you guys to process that consent? thanks

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JessicaParrisWestbrook (talk • contribs) 22:55, 8 March 2015‎ (UTC)
Hi JessicaParrisWestbrook, the current backlog of the OTRS team is 46 days, so I think maybe a few weeks. In the meantime, I added the {{OTRS pending}} template on your images. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

@Thibaut thank you very much for the help!

Why you have deleted Haydeh Changizian Photo?

Hello. We have e-mailed Wiki the written permission from Ms. Haydeh Changizian to upload her photo on stage on 1970s. Why you have deleted the file?,_Prima_Ballerina_of_Persian_Ballet,_with_Jamshid_Saghabashi,_Roudaki_Hall,_Tehran,_mid-1970s.png&action=edit&redlink=1

Regards. --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 11:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

@PersianDutchNetwork: Please read the delete log, I didn't delete any file, Fastily did. The file will be restored when your email will be processed by the OTRS team. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. It's a long time that we have e-mailed the permission. I will contact Fastily.--PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 23:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Bassel Deletions

Hey, you are trying to delete feed material for a Wikipedia Edithathon that is to happen this coming Saturday:

I will try to respond to your deletion posts too, but maybe you can help me out here as there are several files.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon Phillips (talk • contribs) 15:13, 11 March 2015‎ (UTC)
Hi ! Sorry, I just saw that, I cancel my nomination. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ghibli Museum sign, Mitaka 2014-04-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Daniel Cohn-Bendit (1968).jpg

Just click on the source and you will see the logo. --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of useless file revisions

Hello! While uploading a few files, I've uploaded images with some errors, which I've corrected immediately and re-uploaded fixed versions. That had left a few useless file revisions around that just keep clogging the histories, so I'm wondering whether it would be possible to delete those revisions? Could you, please, provide some guidance about that? Any help would be appreciated! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 18:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Please disregard this, it has been already handled. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 20:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Re:File:Dailymotion logo.svg

Nope, {{Speedy}} can also be used to delete previous versions (there a thousand of files that has been tagged in the same way). The {{Speedy}} is intended to get the attention of the administrators without flooding the COM:AN. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@Amitie 10g: [citation needed] Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


Here it is, Commons:Administrators/Requests/Thibaut120094. Accept the nomination and transclude it to the main RfA page. Thanks! Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Declined rename

Thibaut120094: I recently requested a rename of File:Krystyna Ostromęcka-Guryn (17886888750).jpg because I felt the filename was fairly meaningless or ambiguous (specifically the numbers). I noticed that you declined the rename request as it "does not comply with renaming guidelines". If you would be willing, could you please let me know how my requested title fails to comply with the renaming guidelines so that I may learn from this and avoid improper rename requests in the future? Thank you, MJ94 (talk) 05:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi MJ94, Flickr2Commons automatically appends the Flickr ID of the photo to the filename, so I think we should not remove it. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Message of Maiborodan

Dear Thibaut120094,

I will send written permission to the OTRS team tomorrow. Is that fine? Please advice e-mail whom to sent it? Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maiborodan (talk • contribs) 11:18, 27 May 2015‎ (UTC)
Hi Maiborodan, yes it is fine, you can send it in English or in Russian to There are Russian-speakers in the team. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

  Thank you very much for reviewing so quickly the license of a picture I uploaded! I was worried that the source of the picture might disappear because I think the website of those artists will change soon, but now I can relax. Thanks again, and have a great day! Dontreader (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
No problem   Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


Hello, peux-tu jeter un coup d’œil sur ses téléversements qui me semblent problématiques ? Rétrospectivement, je crains d'avoir fait perdre du temps à tout le monde en me limitant à demander des permissions. Cordialement, — Racconish 📥 19:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Racconish: Salut, c'est vrai que t'aurais pu tagger avec {{copyvio}} (tu peux toujours le faire) mais {{npd}} c'est bien aussi car le gus a mentionné la source et l'auteur (même si sur certaines photos ce n'est pas tout à fait correct). S'il n'y a pas de preuve de permission, les photos seront supprimées dans 7 jours. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Merci. Cordialement,— Racconish 📥 15:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Request for revision deletion

Hi. Sorry to bother you. It has been pointed out to me that two of my images include identifiable faces of people without their consent, so I have blurred out the faces and now wish to have the original images deleted. I have read the guidelines at Commons:Revision_deletion, and apparently there is no board to make requests and we have to ask Admins specifically to delete old versions, so I wonder if you could please assist. The two images in question are:

If you could delete/hide the original untouched versions, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 11:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi DAJF, no problem,   Done.
Please don't hesitate if you have any other requests. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks very much. --DAJF (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Persistent legal threat of User:Can456man (uploader of the File:Can456man一二三名刺.JPG)

Pardon me, As per ja:ノート:黒崎真音, ja:利用者‐会話:Puramyun31, ja:利用者‐会話:Can456man, currently I personally paused editing ja:黒崎真音 article and an ip user tries to stopping Can456man's legal threat, but the jawp account still continue the behavior. so I need urgent help. kind regards. --Puramyun31 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Puramyun31, I'm very sorry but I can't do anything on the Japanese Wikipedia, you'll need to contact an administrator of the Japanese Wikipedia here : ja:Wikipedia:管理者伝言板. Also, 株式会社一二三 must contact for legal inquiries, not the users. If 一二三 keep threatening you or the others users of jawiki, they should be blocked as per ja:Wikipedia:法的な脅迫をしない. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


Wanted to improve the rights statemets because the image was uploaded by a GLAM partner after a workshop i gave. Sorry about not doing the proper procedure (didn't knew about it) and thanks for the ping!--Kippelboy (talk) 06:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Offert au nouvel administrateur par ses confrères…

Félicitations Thibaut120094 ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations! Nihil obstat for your RfA!   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks!   Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on your appointment as janitor, admin. Feel free to ask for help if you are unsure of anything. Green Giant (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@Green Giant: I will, thank you.   Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Congrats and good luck! Thanks for your willingness to help us. Trijnsteltalk 23:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: You're welcome, i'm glad to help. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Have a look at my common.js page for some scripts that I have found useful as an admin. I would recommend adding them to your own common.js page one at a time to avoid being overwhelmed by tabs. Remember to purge your cache to get them working. Green Giant (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Marmon truck picture

Hi, can you please check if this file have right licence to be loaded on commons? Thanks--StefBiondo 18:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Stefanobiondo, the license is good, you can upload it. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


Thanks are nice. Appreciated, since I have actually been going through the corpus of images from that source over the last couple of days cleaning them up (and checking that we have the full res version). Revent (talk) 11:49, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Message of Mona778

Hi, I tried to be as polite as I could but this guy User:Secondarywaltz is insane and everybody is complaining about him. You can check his activities and see it yourself.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mona778 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 May 2015‎ (UTC)
No he's not. Please stop your personal attacks, this is your final warning. Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I feel really sorry for whoever that recommended you to become a janitor administrator. (Je suis vraiment désolé pour celui qui t'a recommandé de devenir un concierge administrateur).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mona778 (talk • contribs) 03:27, 5 June 2015‎ (UTC)
Whatever, just stop pretending that it's a sketch and go do something constructive. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Francjñg

Hola, yo no hablo ingles, le quería pedir si mirara la imagen que agrego este usuario porque es la misma que del sitio web, yo veo algún tipo de plagio, espero que usted vea y lo borre, si usted no puede, mande este mensaje al que si puede.

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2015‎ (UTC)

I added {{copyvio}} on the image. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2015 (UTC)



Oui j'ai vu, il n'y a pas de mal, merci cela-dit pour ton message.

Je m'étais dit qu'en n'important des images où les gens ne sont visibles que d'assez loin, en plus à faible résolution, ça pourrait aller. Tant-pis, mais merci à toi, --Floflo (talk) 20:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


Apparently you've deleted the file I uploaded - stone.giants.atrte. This file is an original creation and I own the exclusive rights. Not sure what the problem is.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jegler (talk • contribs) 15:37, 9 June 2015‎ (UTC)
@Jegler: It's a copyrighted album cover, please send a proof of permission from the copyright holders to COM:OTRS. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

I received this: Hello Jegler. It has come to my/someone else's attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

All the files I uploaded were created from the git by me. They are not in copyright violation. I have sent an email regarding Declaration of consent for all inquiries. I hope this suffices. I appreciate your efforts as a volunteer, but damn.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jegler (talk • contribs) 20:33, 9 June 2015‎ (UTC)

just to add some perspective: I love using wikipedia and I appreciate your efforts. this is my first time contributing, and it's not at all straightforward. I just hope I learn can the rules before my account gets deleted... ```` --Jegler (talk) 02:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

this is a pretty steep learning curve for me and I have a question maybe you could help answer. I went to and filled out a CC0 — “No Rights Reserved” form. If I post images I want to upload to wikipedia on a page of my website ( on which I also post a CCO waiver, will that cover me? Thanks for your time. Jegler (talk) 02:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC) here's the actual link I'm referring to

It's perfect, I restore the images. Don't forget to add this link if you upload other images. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:33, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

OK cool. thanks.

restore my image

Hello! I've uploaded logo of my company while creating wiki page, but you deleted that image. Can you restore that image? I have all rights to use this logo. File:Логотип Сима ленд.png
Black Diamond Zimn (talk) 11:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Black Diamond Zimn, you didn't add a license on your files, and since the logo is published elsewhere ( we need a proof of permission from the copyright holders to, see COM:OTRS/ru for more details. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Restoration of movie poster

Hi, I have uploaded poster and a image for our Movie's wikipedia page, but it is getting deleted. Will u restore it. We are the producer of the movie and we own all the rights. File:Miss Match.jpg
File:Miss Match Music Launch.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Devsmeher (talk • contribs) 21:14, 13 June 2015‎ (UTC)
@Devsmeher: Please submit a declaration of consent per the instructions at COM:OTRS. Revent (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hiroshi Nishihara 60th birthday.jpg

Hi, Sorry I am new to this. In the note that was left, it was stated that "A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ( This also applies if you are the author yourself." However, I saw on the Commons page that I do not have to contact OTRS if "I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)." Although I mentioned that the image is from a group, I am also part of the group and I definitely took the image myself. Hence I am confused. How should I go about with this problem?


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Konisu (talk • contribs)
Hi Konisu, the author and source of the file says "Nishihara Laboratory", and we have no proof that Konisu = Nishihara Laboratory. So that's why we need proof of permission by e-mail to OTRS. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Merci pour l'IQ !

Tout est dans le titre (je parle de File:Vihajärvi.jpg). --inisheer (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

De rien, très jolies tes photos   Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


Helo! You deleted page File:Скрін33243.jpg because it has copyright violation. But there is a permission for publication of this image — Template:Attribution-GSC Game World. Can you undelete it and rename to Cossacks 3 screenshot 1?

P.S.: Sory if this page isn’t appropriate place for such request. Dimma837 (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

@Dimma837:   Done, sorry didn't know this template. Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Dimma837 (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Open proxies

I noticed the revision deletions, protections and IP blocks you did last night at VP and AN. Good work! I've changed the IP blocks to 1-year hard blocks, which is my usual treatment for open/anon proxies. When you get IP hopping vandals, and the IPs are from different countries, you're usually dealing with open proxies. If you wanted to do a simple check on an IP, a quick Google search of the IP is often all you need: That search is for User: You'll notice all the spam hits, and second to the bottom a hit from a proxy list: INeverCry 20:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Alors comme ça...

on demande les outils sur Commons mais pas sur WP, c'est du propre ! Merci pour le statut patrol en passant. Binabik (d) 01:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

@Binabik: Salut Binabik, eh oui !  . De rien, pense à lire tes mails  . Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


Je reviens vers vous, car j'ai vu que trois fichiers sont soumis à approbation pour suppression, c'est uniquement le fichier "demission cassation" que je veux supprimer.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedoniste (talk • contribs) 09:00, 18 June 2015‎ (UTC)

Merci j'ai vu que vous avez supprimmé le fichier. Je suis toujours à la recherche d'une personne ou service qui pourrait m'aider...


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedoniste (talk • contribs) 11:55, 18 June 2015‎ (UTC)

Toujours moi...Je vois que les autres fichiés sont soumis pour une annulation, mais ce n'est pas le cas je veux les garder. Merci de bien vouloir les régulariser.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedoniste (talk • contribs) 12:03, 18 June 2015‎ (UTC)
@Hedoniste: Bonjour, merci de signer vos messages en tapant ~~~~. C'est à vous de les "régulariser", nous avons besoin de savoir de quelle source proviennent ces textes (nom et date du journal ou de l'ouvrage et nom de l'auteur) pour savoir si ces textes sont dans le domaine public ou non. Wikimedia Commons et Wikipédia n'acceptent que le contenu sous licence libre ou dans le domaine public, voir COM:L pour plus d'informations. Pour de l'aide vous pouvez consulter cette page ou cette page. Vous pouvez aussi poser des questions ici. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

je ne sais pas si j'ai bien compris, c'est "nowiki" qu'il faut que j'insère à la fin de mon message? Pour info je travaille sur mac os et je n'ai pas tous les caractères comme ^ horizontal... merci C'est bon j'ai trouvé le Hedoniste (talk) pas mourir idiot...



This photograph has been or is about to be deleted for the third time. The situation is this: the subject was photographed by a professional photographer approx eighteen months ago. The photographer handed over ALL copyright to the subject ie he agreed to allow the photograph to be used under public domain. Since then, this image has been used on numerous websites with NO difficulty except on wiki commons and Wikipedia. The photographer was contacted last week, the situation was explained ie that the image was to be used on Wikipedia/wiki commons. He had no problem with that. He kindly removed some text on the image so that he did not lay claim inadervertently to any copyright while maintaining public domain on the image. He then sent the new image to the subject who then uploaded it to his Flickr account who in the meantime had altered the licensing terms on his account to creative commons share-alike. This latest image was uploaded to wiki commons a short time ago and lo and behold it is now subject to a deletion request. What can be done to stop this nonsensical merry go round? I can supply the photographer's website address where you can contact him but it seems extraordinary the lengths that the subject, the contributor and in particular the photographer have had to go through for all this. By the way, the photographer does not use Flickr which is why the subject uploaded the image to his Flickr account. Hoping for some light on the subject. Anne O'Donnell (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

@Anne O'Donnell: There's no proof on this Flickr account that the photographer gave his permission (see COM:LL), just send a proof of permission from the photographer to COM:OTRS. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Immediately stop uploading copyright violations, please.

I just call stephanie Gibaud, she will send me personal pictures as soon as possible.

We though there were no copyright with pictures from screen shot TV show.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MARADIN MAURICE (talk • contribs) 13:51, 19 June 2015‎ (UTC)
Oui, effectivement les émissions TV sont protégés par le droit d'auteur. I speak French btw. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)



Just to let you know that the photographer of the JPEG in question has emailed OTRS (he did this yesterday) regarding copyright clearance for this image. He has done so under the terms of Creative Commons Share-Alike 4. I presume this is sufficient. If not, please let me know. I also have the ticket number so can pass that on to you if required. Many thanks. (Sorry if this is in a new section but I don't know how to connect this with the previous thread). Anne O'Donnell (talk) 12:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

It's perfect. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Vins etc.

Hello, il faudrait penser à virer les versions antérieures des fichiers conservés après floutage. Cordialement, — Racconish 📥 16:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Salut, c'est ce que j'ai fait pour File:Vin de pays 05.jpg qui a été conservé, j'attends que les autres DR soient clôturées et qu'il y ait consensus avant de revdel. Dis-moi si j'en ai oublié. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Je suis sûr que tu n'en oublieras pas   Cordialement, — Racconish 📥 16:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


Hi, Thank you very much for all your help in relation to the Colm Keane image, appreciated. Anne O'Donnell (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Droits ?

Hello Thibaut120094,

j'ai des doutes sur les droits de ce fichier :


qui vient d'être posé sur cette page.

As-tu le temps de vérifier ?

Merci, --Do not follow (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Salut Dnf, copyvio évident qui vient probablement du Facebook du chanteur, j'ai supprimé, merci du signalement  . Bien à toi, Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


There's quite a bit of information available on the image, but unfortunately this information just doesn't slot into the predetermined rigid categories of the Information template in any simple or direct manner. Adding a template with almost all of the fields left blank really doesn't accomplish anything much which is useful, and adding a template with blank fields generating error messages marks an image for ultimate deletion (though there is no reason to delete this image). See further remarks at User talk:Revent. -- 16:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bojan Radej 2015.jpg

Hi, this image is free at source, as discussed at OTRS/N. Could you restore it please? Thanks. -- (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

  Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


Hello man, for this file i've got an autorisation from the artists himselfs : - - Le pro du 94 !

Bonjour Le pro du 94 :), sauf que nous avons besoin d'une preuve de permission via COM:OTRS. De plus, le groupe doit autoriser que l'image soit réutilisée par n'importe qui et dans n'importe quel but y compris commercial, pas seulement pour Wikipédia, voir COM:L à ce sujet. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Besoin d'identification Photos Trepper

J'ai bien reçu votre message, et j'ai contacté l'ayant droit. Il devrait vous répondre au plus vite.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Villaf36 (talk • contribs) 12:03, 29 May 2015‎ (UTC)

C'est le fichier "demission cassation " que je souhaite supprimer c'est un doublon merci

Merci pour votre réponse, j'ai une agréable surprise en voyant qu'il y a un suivi à une demande.. Sans doute êtes vous familier avec wikipedia, tout le contraire de moi! En réalité Je souhaite bien améliorer la page de ÉMILE TYAN et j'ai mis par hasard en mémoire des fichiers pour m'habituer au fonctionnement du site sous mon pseudo "hédoniste"J'avoue que c'est un peu ardu pour qui n'a pas l'usage facile d'internet. Je voudrais supprimer ce fichier "démission cassation " qui est un doublon. Au delà de ça, existe il une aide par un site même payant pour m'aider à réaliser mon travail, je suis un peu perdu...ou bien un contact quelconque pour des débutants qui ne sont pas très familiers avec tout cela. pour info j'habite à Paris. Bien cordialement


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedoniste (talk • contribs) 08:57, 18 June 2015‎ (UTC)

CyrilVuiguier photo

--Charlesmidor (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Bonjour Thibaut20094 je suis nouveau et en tant que personne qui travaille pour le compte de Cyril Viguier lui même, comme j'ai eu sa réponse que hier, j'ai mis une photo que j'avais fait. Merci pour les informations à propos de l'auteur, Cyril n'avait sûrement pas pensé que c'était nécessaire de le faire. comment est-ce que je peux modifier les infos pour que la photo de profil soit celle-ci et non celle que j'ai fait. merci--Charlesmidor (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)charlesmidor

Procédure de suppression

Bonjour Thibaut,

la technique c'est pas mon fort et je me paume dans Commons : il s'agit de


suite à un canular supprimé sur wp:fr

Merci si tu as le temps de voir (et aussi de me dire où aller la prochaine fois)

amicalement, --Do not follow (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

P.S. et euh... en fait il y en a tout un lot ici →[3]  
Salut Do not follow, merci du signalement, j'ai supprimé ces photo-montages ridicules. Tu peux sans problème utiliser ma page de discussion, sinon il y a COM:BISTRO ou COM:AN (en anglais uniquement). Amicalement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
@Do not follow: Pour créer une demande de suppression, tu peux utiliser le lien "Nominate for deletion"/"Proposer la suppression" dans la barre de gauche. Pour faire une demande de suppression rapide (dans le cas de copyvios par exemple), tu peux activer le gadget Quick Delete dans tes préférences et t'aura un lien "Report copyright violation"/"Signaler une contravention au droit d’auteur" dans la barre de gauche. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Ah oui, ça fonctionne, super merci Thibaut --Do not follow (talk) 16:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Cancellazione Foto di Vittorio_Gussoni_Nudo_Femminile_con_mantello

Buongiorno ho bisogno di un tuo aiuto per mantenere la foto di Vittorio_Gussoni_Nudo_Femminile_con_mantello. ho inviato anche E-mail inviata come dichiarazione OTRS. devo a questo punto scrivere qualcosa sulla pagina nella sezione dei permessi per mantenere la foto ed evitare che sia cancellata? se sì, potresti indicarmi il testo da indicare, da scrivere. ti ringrazio per il momento.

Lorenzo Pacini

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LORENZOpacini (talk • contribs) 10:00, 25 July 2015‎ (UTC)
Hi, sorry I don't speak Italian :/ If you have sent the mail to OTRS, then please remove {{No permission since}} and add {{subst:OP}} to the permission field, like this. It can take weeks before someone process your email, so please be patient. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Dark Conspiracy

Hello Thibaut120094,

Recently you deleted a file from Commons (File:Conspiracy Rules cover.jpg) that was used on the en:Dark Conspiracy article. Would it be possible for me to obtain a copy of the file with the proper info and re-upload it to en-wiki? BOZ (talk) 16:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi BOZ, I sent you an email. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I can download it when I get home. BOZ (talk) 17:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

judor92 bloquer

bonjour thibault, tu a bloqué mon compte à cause d'une photo que jai trouver sur flickr sous license (CC-BY) donc pourquoi m'a tu bloqué?????? Et pour combine de temps m'a tu bloquer?? Judor92 (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Judor92, je n'ai pas bloqué ton compte, je t'ai laissé un avertissement vu les nombreux signalements de copyvios sur ta page de discussion... La photo est certes sous licence CC-BY 2.0, mais la couverture du magazine ne l'est pas, c'est pour ça que j'ai supprimé la photo. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


Pardon me Thibaut120094, could you give me some help? I faced the user Vmffjtmrkarl's deletion requests. Vmffjtmrkarl raises a photo watermark issue and claims we need further notification to use the nominated files to the author, even the files are licensed under CC-BY license, as I know the license does not require such notification. I'm simply a normal user, so I'm not sure I successfully solve this issue as alone. --Puramyun31 (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Puramyun31, I saw the deletion requests, I asked -revi who is a Korean-speaker to have a look. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your effort. Best regards. --Puramyun31 (talk) 13:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
By the way, -revi said "I will try to contact the copyright owner...", so I'm nervous about the comment since the files are not uploaded in bad faith. --Puramyun31 (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Also, can you close this DR? --Puramyun31 (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Done. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much. regards. --Puramyun31 (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Photographs in Category:Andavadoaka

Dear Thibaut120094,

This is mostly meant as a FYI. I undid your deletions because I managed to persuade the Flickr account holder to relicense his photographs :). Natuur12 (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Natuur12, no problem, thanks!   Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Michel Crauste

Bonjour, J'ai de nouveaux droits et de nouvelles images, j'ai fait un nouvel envoi à ORTS. Merci. Bonne continuation. Dd (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, Personne n'a encore traité mes demandes. Merci d'avance. Dd (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Pour moi ici : File:Jean Prat.jpg cette photo a été copiée sans droit par un nouveau contributeur. Dd (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Merci du signalement, j'ai supprimé le fichier. Tu peux utiliser le modèle {{copyvio}} quand tu vois une image non-libre. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Merci. Bonne continuation. Dd (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Eu Quouècheune for you

Salut Thibaut, penses-tu que File:A la découverte de l'Aid al-Adha - un documentaire de Farid Dms Debah.jpg est libre de droits ? Je pense pas vu [4]ceci. Merci, bonne journée. --Do not follow (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

P.S. et ses autres apports → [5]
@Do not follow: Salut, désolé j'ai complètement oublié ton message. À mon avis File:A la découverte de l'Aid al-Adha - un documentaire de Farid Dms Debah.jpg est {{PD-textlogo}}. Les autres j'ai ajouté {{no permission since}}. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
merci Thibaut pour ton aide ; --Do not follow (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Salon du livre

Bonjour, je ne comprends pas ce déluge de mails quant à l'image que j'ai téléchargée ni comment agir pour me mettre en règle. Merci de m'éclaircir. Silvanuche Silvanuche (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Silvanuche, avez-vous l'autorisation du photographe pour placer son travail sous licence libre ? Si oui, suivez la procédure sur c:COM:OTRS/fr, si non, je serais alors dans l'obligation de supprimer l'image. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Subir Archivos.

Hola, me gustaría que me ayudaras a subir archivos sin infringir los derechos de autor, ya que no soy muy experto en el tema. Saludos.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablo inos (talk • contribs) 21:52, 20 August 2015‎ (UTC)
Hi Pablo inos, sorry I don't speak Spanish. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free-licensed media, please see Commons:Sobre las licencias. However, some trademarked "simple" logos like File:New espn extra.PNG can be uploaded with the {{PD-textlogo}} template. You can ask questions to Spanish-speakers here: Commons:Café. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


Pour les droits d'utilisateur   -- Sebk (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sebk : De rien  . Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

anonymous IP editor making strange edits to logos

Thibaut120094, what appears to be the same anonymous IP editor who kept making strange edits/vandalism to File:Disney-channel-new2015.png (and a few other logos) is now doing it to File:Cartoon Network 2010 logo.svg and File:Discovery Life logo.svg. You applied brief IP blocks before, would you consider doing it again? Or maybe even better, apply semi-protection for a week or so to these files? —RP88 (talk) 22:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi RP88, thanks for the heads-up, I blocked the IP address 1 day and added the files on my watchlist. Regards. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I appreciate it. —RP88 (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
And now File:HLN 2014 logo.svg and File:ESPN Radio logo.svg. —RP88 (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Blocked 1 day, thanks!. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

License Review

Excuse me Thibaut120094, can I ask a help to you? Recently unreviewed files are more than 1000 files over 1 week, so I think we need to check them quickly. but I wonder that license reviewing Korean images seems to (currently) mostly be left with user:-revi alone, such as this user:Vmffjtmrkarl case. Although I understand your idea that it is better to ask a Korean-speaker when we treat some of license-review-needed files, but according to contributions of -revi, the Korean admin seems to be somewhat inactive than I thought and think the task is very tiresome business. (For user:Vmffjtmrkarl example, -revi reviewed requested files only but didn't review other unreviewed Korean images) Maybe are we depending too much on the user? --Puramyun31 (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Puramyun31, I normally help reviewing photos of K-Pop stars and all Asia-related media, but I didn't have very much time these days. I'll try to help reviewing them. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm busy throughout 2015 (declaired on my talk page) and will be able to be more active by end of Oct. Meanwhile, why don't you be reviewer and review non-own k-pop images? — regards, Revi 17:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
@-revi: Do you suggest to me it is Okay to be a reviewer Myself? In fact, I am not sure how successful I will be. --Puramyun31 (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
(Typo fix: upload=>review) Why not? I think you have sufficient knowledge for the reviewer. — regards, Revi 23:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
(Sorry I'm late for my answer) Thank you for telling me that, However I doubt myself whether I have a right mind for a license reviewer, since I sometimes show indecisive attitudes. --Puramyun31 (talk) 05:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Since license reviewing seems to be currently proceeding slowly than I expected, my position have been changed. I think it is unavoidable that someone should resolve the situation. --Puramyun31 (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

changer un titre oblige à réimporter

salut thibaut, je voudrai rapporter un truc qui m'énerve sur common et vu que je sais pas où je viens ici.

Quand j'importe une image avec upload wizard. Tout ce passe bien.

Je clique "ce fichier est de mon propre travail", je met suivant

ensuite il faut choisir un titre, une date, un decrptif

Je clique sur suivant, il me dis le titre est déjà pris.

Je change le titre , mais je na'i plus suivant, je suis obligé de relancer l'importation.

Si mon fichier met 2 secondes à importer ce n'est pas grave; mais quand c'est une vidéo et que ça prend 10 minutes parce qu'il y a conversion de firefogg en même temps, là on hésite à le refaire(enfin me concernant).


jt'ai fait une vidéo au cas où tu comprendrai pas

(je ne suis pas souvent sur common donc si tu pouvais me répondre sur ma pdd wikipedia) (pourquoi toi? tu est admin sur common il me semble, donc je supposais que tu savais ou transmettre ou quoi faire de mon message)

Vatadoshu (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Salut Vatadoshu, essaie peut-être d'en parler sur Commons:Upload Wizard feedback‎. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
merci, j'ai laissé un mot. Vatadoshu (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

FYI Commons:Requests_for_rights#Infinite0694


Sorry for Commons:Requests_for_rights#Infinite0694, read header. :-(

Infinite is a Global Rollbacker and we are rollbackers on all projects, without exceptions.

Cheers, Alan (talk) 20:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Woops sorry, I'll be more careful next time :P Thanks, Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm really sorry for having troubled you so much...--Infinite0694 (talk) 18:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
@Infinite0694: いいえ、いいえ、大丈夫ですよ. No problem. ;) Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

License Review

Excuse me, Recently I reviewed several License Review-tagged files (approximately over 70 files), but I need some help, since I can't review flies my own uploads, as per my user rights. (...Please note that as of 21 February 2012, image-reviewers may not review their own uploads unless the account is an approved bot...) --Puramyun31 (talk) 12:54, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I will review the files when I have more time. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


Hello Thibaut. Many thanks for your efficient work on Brillac images this afternoon.   Jack ma (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

In response to the messge "Copyright Violations"

Hello there, I am newbie to Wikimedia Commons & didn't know how to use of it. I didn't know what are the procedures and steps on how to put a legal picture on which it is my creation & to tell you honestly that I didn't take these pictures from any other websites or etc. It is OFFICIALLY mine in order to be added to the draft info box that I created about the person "Kenneth Earl Medrano". I really don't understand why? Since I follow all of the steps, but still it removed to the draft the template pictures of the subject that I created. It takes time to read all of the notes of it. So my question is, If do so. Give me some ways how upload the picture & tell me the very easy way? Or the main solution of it is to "Donate these Pictures of Mine to Wikimedia Commons"? Is there any payment or compensation that I will oblige to pay for if I donate these materials? Or how these pictures to be licensed of it? Please give me some explanations of it and I'm looking forward to your response. Thanks. -Mystywave18 (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Mystywave18, images you find on the Internet are not necessarily free-licensed and you need permission from the copyright holder. If you're really the copyright holder (which I highly doubt, but anyway) you need to contact COM:OTRS. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Admin's Barnstar
For all your work so far. Also congratulations for your OTRS access.
Scoopfinder(d) 10:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup Scoopfinder, ça fait plaisir  . Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Château d'Aguts, de Montgey et de Roquevidal

Bonjour Thibaut,

Vous m'avez signalé que les photos mise en ligne ce matin n'étaient pas assez renseignées au sujet de la licence. Ne comprenant pas grand chose à ces licences, je voudrais quelques précisions. Sur le site où je les ai trouvé, ici, il est mentionné la phrase : « Les photos (19 492 photos à ce jour) sont sous licence "photo©BE", libres de droit à la seule condition d'indiquer l'origine et faire un lien, les photos qui nous ont été adressées (nous indiquons toujours la source) demeurent la propriété exclusive du propriétaire. » En toute bonne fois, j'en déduis qu'on peut télécharger. Est-ce vrai ? Dans l'affirmative, mon erreur vient de la case cochée lors de leur téléchargement ? Pouvez-vous éclairer ma lanterne, je n'y comprend rien dans ces licences. Merci de votre aide et cordiales salutations, PANDA 81 (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Panda,
Dans une autre page du site, il est marqué "Les photos sont sous licence "photo©webmaster eb", :libres de droit, à condition de demander et citer la source en faisant un lien :", ce n'est pas très clair. On a donc besoin d'une autorisation claire et précise de type COM:CONSENT/fr de la part du webmaster qu'il doit envoyer à COM:OTRS/fr. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Fichier supprimé (Microsoft France, hommage)


J'aimerai connaitre les raisons de la suppression de mon image de la page d'accueil de Microsoft France.

Pourquoi mon image a-t-elle été supprimée alors qu'elle est paramétrée exactement de la même façon que celle de Google et Youtube hébergée par un autre utilisateur.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlebutte (talk • contribs) 22:00, 15 November 2015‎ (UTC)
Voir ma réponse ici. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Antoine Daniel (18597419265).jpg

File:Antoine Daniel (18597419265).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 11:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Antoine Daniel.jpg

File:Antoine Daniel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 11:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File talk:Georges Boukoff.jpg

Bonsoir, je ne sais pas si les notifs fonctionnent sur Commons, je t'ai mis un mot ici : File talk:Georges Boukoff.jpg - Bonne soirée --Lomita (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Salut Lomita !   Oui t'inquiète pas, les notifs marchent bien ici ^^ Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Photos utilisables sur Commons ?

Bonjour Thibaut,

J'ai trouvé un site de photos sur les races bovines portugaises. Il y est mentionné sur cette page que As fotografias obtidas a partir deste site podem ser livremente utilizadas. Sempre que possível deve ser referida a sua origem/autor. Traduction aproximative : les photos obtenues sur ce site peuvent être librement utilisées. Chaque fois que possible, on doit faire référence à son origine ou l'auteur. Il est aussi précisé que les images ne peuvent être vendues, ni utilisées pour offenser, discriminer, diffamer ou dans un mode indécent.

Puis-je en déduire que ces images sont importables sur Commons ? Merci de votre aide. Cordialement, --PANDA 81 (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour PANDA 81. Non malheureusement ils interdisent la réutilisation commerciale, donc elles ne peuvent pas être importées sur Commons, voir COM:L/fr. Cordialement. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Nationaal Archief-license

Bonjour Thibaut!

Please change the template Nationaal Archief-license.

Bonjour ManFromNord. See my reply there. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Bonne Année 2016 !

  Classique, mais... merci quand même pour ta participation sur Commons ! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Oh un brownie ! Merci Yann ! Bonne année à toi aussi ! --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Les voeux traditionnels

  Cher ami
Bonne année et meilleurs voeux!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer : Merci beaucoup, à toi aussi ! --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC) News Photo 001016-D-9880W-034.jpg

Bonjour, je voudrais recadrer cette image pour obtenir une image davantage centrée sur Madlala-Routledge, et l'utiliser dans un article fr.Wp sur cette personnalité sud-africaine; Est-ce possible ? --HenriDavel (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour HenriDavel ! Bien sûr cette image est dans le domaine public, vous pouvez même activer le gadget CropTool dans vos préférences pour rogner l'image et l'uploader automatiquement avec toutes les informations du fichier original  . Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Merci. --HenriDavel (talk) 14:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Lans-en-Vercors. Jacques-Antoine Biboud.JPG

Bonjour Thibaut120094, la réponse donnant l’autorisation de licences m’a été adressée par mail que je transfère à l’OTRS. Vous remerciant des démarches qui seront effectuées avant toute publication sur WPfr. Cordialement --6PO 15:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

C'est fait !   Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Merci infiniment Thibaut120094. Cordialement--6PO 17:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Demande de SI


Peux-tu stp supprimer ces redirections nuisibles (besoin d'uploader des fichiers dessus) ?

Merci ! Jules78120 (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

@Jules78120 : C'est fait. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:PC DIY SHOP FreeT 発売記念イベント 西明日香さん 2.jpg

Excuse me Thibaut120094, the DR (3rd) re-opened today, though As per the result (kept) of earlier discussions. currently I appealed the deletion claim, Can you help me? --Puramyun31 (talk) 05:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


Hi Thibaut, I'm Taichi from Spanish Wikipedia. I'm notifying you about the constant blankings from the user Mona778, in his archive, including a message sending by you few days ago. The user believes that blanking all the messages is OK in Commons, but I don't find any policy or rule that permits the blanking as "courtesy". If I'm wrong please tell me, because the user persists about blanking all the messages. Thanks. --Taichi (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring about blanking of templated notifications is silly and pointless. All of the messages are in the history of the talk page if anyone wants to see them. Because of the edit warring, they are now there several times! And now they are also in the history of the archive as well. Several times there too! I suggest to stop edit warring over templated messages from many months ago, leave the editor's talk page alone, and do something useful for the project instead. MPS1992 (talk) 03:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
@MPS1992: Sorry, but I request to Thibaut, as Commons administrator, not you. Also, this is your first edit in Wikimedia Commons. Do you know the Wikimedia Commons policies? This is not English Wikipedia, and this situation must be resolved here in Commons. Another users as Yeza reverted the blanking here, but Mona778 point me always. Please, you don't know the reality of the affairs here. --Taichi (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Since you are pinging me about this here, I am very happy to respond here. The relevant official guideline on Commons is Commons:Talk page guidelines. If there are other Commons policies that are relevant, I am sure Thibaut will know about them. I have not suggested that this is English Wikipedia, so trying to imply that seems wrong. MPS1992 (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Regarding "the reality of the affairs", please have a look at [6]. A clear case of cross-wiki hounding. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 08:57, 06 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, Mona778 stopped uploading copyvio several months ago and blanked her talk page with a courtesy template so for me it's fine.
But it's just my opinion, you can ask other admins on COM:AN/U. Kind regards. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
@Thibaut120094 At last! Thank you dear for putting an end to this game of cat and mouse.---With a very warm hug. By the way, it's a she not he, that you said "blanked his talk page," just wanted you to know! ( Mona778 (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC) )
@Thibaut120094: Thanks for the response, because I reverted the blanking made by an IPv6 [7] not to the Mona778 editions. But is fine. And a last thing MPS1992 and the Turkish IP, the another half of the history is in Spanish Wikipedia, but is sad for both because I'm not the main character of that history. Bye. --Taichi (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


Bonsoir Thibaut,

En patrouillant j'ai constaté que ce contributeur PHOTOMAN (talk · contribs) semble confondre Commons avec Flickr. J'ai besoin d'aide.--Sismarinho (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hmm c'est à dire ? Des photos personnelles out of scope ? Tu peux ouvrir une demande de suppression en masse avec COM:VFC. Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)


Good evening Thibaut120094 !

You have deleted pictures: "NBonnal" and "NBonnal2", these pictures are the property of Nicolas Bonnal himself who allowed the follow sites to use their on their blogs:

Of course, I have mentionned the sources and their author. So why do you deleted these pictures ?

Sincerely yours,


Bonjour, merci de suivre la procédure sur c:COM:OTRS/fr. Il nous faut l'autorisation écrite des auteurs/ayant-droits des photos qui autorisent de placer leur travail sous licence libre. Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Bonsoir Thibaut120094 !

Bien évidemment ! Voici la réponse mail:

Cher Anthony Mon ami Nicolas Bonnal peut utiliser sans problème tout ce qu’il veut de mon site. Mais je ne sais pas de quelle photo vous voulez parler… Bien amicalement. Béatrice Bohly

Bien cordialement,


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Antosha06 (talk • contribs)
Bonsoir, avez-vous lu mon message ? Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, oui je pensais qu'une autorisation écrite par l'auteur suffirait... Merci quand même.


Affiche de L'or du golfe

Pourquoi avoir effacer cette image? Si vous êtes pas certain, peut-être qu'un petit message avant d'effacer serait de rigueur. Politesse... Je suis le seul détenteur des droits. C'est une affiche de film qui est par définition reproductible par tout le monde à des fins non commerciales. Avez-vous un problème avec ça? Ianjaquier (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Oui avec la partie "à des fins non commerciales", voir Commons:À propos des licences et COM:OTRS/fr. Merci. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Pouvez-vous m'expliquer comment créer une image de ce type: avec utilisation commerciale possible pour toute utilisation dans le contexte de ou en lien avec le film? Merci.

Vous pouvez importer le logo du film (et non l'affiche) sans effectuer toutes les procédures de licence libre. Le logo doit être importé ici. Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


Salut Thibaut, j'ai des doutes sur le copyright des téléversements de Special:Contributions/Jerryleonidefan (voir ici, bas de page). Aurais-tu le temps de regarder ?   Thank you. --Do not follow (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Supprimé. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification de traduction : Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion

Bonjour, Thibaut120094,

Vous recevez cette notification car vous avez signé en tant que traducteur de français et japonais sur Wikimedia Commons. La page Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion est disponible pour la traduction. Vous pouvez la traduire ici :

La priorité de cette page est moyenne.

Please help us to translate the speedy deletion policy in many language so that non-english speaker can read it as well.

Votre aide est grandement appréciée. Les traducteurs comme vous aident Wikimedia Commons à fonctionner comme une véritable communauté multilingue.

Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences de notification.

Merci !!!!

Les coordinateurs de traduction de Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

My talk page

The Japanese editor's main mission appears to be vandalizing my talk page. You reverted it recently. I have been very patient with a newbie, but now I feel stronger action should be taken. What can I do? Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I blocked him 3 days. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Demande aide pour Hassan Ben m'Barek contributeur Socrate75016

bonjour monsieur Thibault 120094.

je suis nouveau malgré que mon compte est ouvert depuis décembre 2014. Mon objectif, en qualité de contributeur, est de faire un inventaire, des personnalités et des organisations issues des quartiers populaires qui au travers, de plusieurs de leur actions et de leurs prises de position ont eu un traitement médiatique national et internationale auprès de médias sérieux et reconnus.

Effet, mon premier article sur lequel je travaille depuis longtemps ( voir historique dans brouillon) concerne hassan ben m'barek, J'ai donc contacter monsieur ben m'barek afin d'avoir des éléments biographiques et des photos mais aussi de lui demander il y a quelques jours d'envoyez les déclarations de consentement pour les images utilisées dans l'article afin d'être en conformité avec les principes de wikipédia.

Plusieurs administrateurs avaient écrit pour supprimer ces photos mais comme je ne comprenais pas bien les procédures de validations et j'avais beaucoup de mal techniquement à retrouver dans Wikipédia car ce n'est pas du tout facile. Ce qui a eu mon conséquence qu'un administrateur qui avait demandé depuis décembre la suppression de plusieurs photos à poser un bandeau en rouge pour la suppression de la page entière car je remettais des photos supprimés. Il n'y avait pas de mauvaise intention de ma part simplement je ne comprenais pas.

Initialement il y a avait un bandeau jaune qui demandait de préciser les sources avec un délai d'1 an ,

Comme vous êtes un auditeur certifié et reconnu dde wikipédia, j'aimerai savoir si vous pouviez m'apporter votre aide pour me dire ce qui a lieu de faire pour rédiger au mieux cet article et le corriger afin qu'il soit accepté car il est mis en discussion


Merci pour votre aide

C'est fait nous avons reçu les autorisations. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manoir de Marmont.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Elise lucet cash investigation.png et Ghost adventures crew.jpg


Je tiens à vous informer que les documents suivants : " Elise_lucet_cash_investigation.png " et " Ghost_adventures_crew.jpg ", ont été vérifiés et les vérificateurs ont indiqué que ces documents étaient valides. Pourquoi avez-vous déclaré une violation du droit d'auteur ?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Belpois30 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour, voir COM:LL, celui qui les a importé sur Flickr n'est pas le titualire des droits d'auteur de ces images. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour, ah d'accord, merci pour cet éclaircissement. --Belpois30 (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I think you misunderstood my intention!

Hi, There was no need to revert, I just tried to be nice! (Mona778 (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC))

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hackeur.jpg

Hi, probably you are unaware we have a bot that closes a DR after some time if a file gets deleted via e.g. a copyvio tag? Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

You don't believe me? Well, I will show - Jcb (talk) 22:22, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
It's been more than 10 days, the bot is obviously not working. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Probably there was a problem with the bot that day, but it seems up and running again. Normally there is no need to bother about open DR's after deletion by a different procedure. Although I think we should all try to avoid double procedures. In case of File:Lita, avec le nouveau WWE Women's Championship.jpg, the DR was started 4 days after the no source tagging and completely unnecessary, because the no source tagging would take care of deletion after 4 more days. Jcb (talk) 22:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Fichiers douteux en attente

, Sur le Bistro, j'ai ouvert le 18 avril 2016 une section Copie de fichiers trouvés sur le web, pour signaler l'existence de dix fichiers faisant l'objet de copyvios certains et de deux autres douteux. À la suite de mon signalement, tu avais initié une procédure de demande de suppression normale pour les deux fichiers douteux : File:Travaux de la Gare de Dugny la Courneuve août 2015.jpg et File:Travaux de la Gare de Dugny la Courneuve août 2015 (2).jpg. Comme plus de sept jours se sont écoulés depuis la demande que tu avais faite, je me permets de te demander si tu sais pourquoi la suppression effective de ces deux fichiers n'est pas intervenue. Cordialement. Geralix (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, la réponse se trouve ici, nous avons un important backlog de demandes de suppression à traiter et donc ça peut prendre un peu de temps. Cordialement. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Rebonjour, Effectivement, la liste est longue. Merci de ta réponse rapide. Geralix (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Merci pour ne pas commencer un Edit War. Le logo ancien des NeuLib est le logo ancien car il est interdit d'utiliser cet logo de 3Mai2016. eMail à l'adresse eMail copyvio est envoyé.

Très gentil d'effacer le logo ancien ASAP, car sinon, l'entreprise qui s'est identifié comme gardeur du copyright certainement va entrer le court contre la partie des Neue Liberale. On voudrait bien laisser ca.

Si vous savez plus, faites l'entreprise contacter les Neue Liberale et clarifier que l'interdiction de l'usage du logo ancien n'est plus en force.

Si vous ne savez pas plus, merci de ne plus toucher l'image et laisser le Team CopyVio du Wikimedia resolver ca.

--Hornsignal (talk) 13:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Hornsignal, why are you talking to me in broken French instead of English ? I'm part of the copyvio team and I saw your mail, it will probably be denied since the file is used and it's more like a trademark problem than a copyright one. Please open a deletion request instead or upload the new logo on Commons so we can speedy delete the old one. Thanks. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Ramón Cerdà

Hello Thibaut120094, I have received your message that if someone does not send the message that I got permission from the photos, there is Borra seven days, and tomorrow. It turns out that yesterday I sent the owner of the photos that you give permission to send a few days. Did you could give me a few more days? Because I do not know when it will send. Thank you very much. Sincerely, --Aidalova (talk) 14:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

It turns out that it has already sent, thanks anyway--Aidalova (talk) 08:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification de traduction : Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n

Bonjour, Thibaut120094,

Vous recevez cette notification car vous avez signé en tant que traducteur de français et japonais sur Wikimedia Commons. La page Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n est disponible pour la traduction. Vous pouvez la traduire ici :

Votre aide est grandement appréciée. Les traducteurs comme vous aident Wikimedia Commons à fonctionner comme une véritable communauté multilingue.

Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences de notification.

Merci !!!!

Les coordinateurs de traduction de Wikimedia Commons‎, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification de traduction : Commons:Picture of the Year/2015

Bonjour, Thibaut120094,

Vous recevez cette notification car vous avez signé en tant que traducteur de français et japonais sur Wikimedia Commons. La page Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 est disponible pour la traduction. Vous pouvez la traduire ici :

Votre aide est grandement appréciée. Les traducteurs comme vous aident Wikimedia Commons à fonctionner comme une véritable communauté multilingue.

Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences de notification.

Merci !!!!

Les coordinateurs de traduction de Wikimedia Commons‎, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Deleting the rest of User:Lindenhurstlib's uploads

I noticed you closed the two DRs I opened for two of User:Lindenhurstlib's uploads. It really seems like we need to delete the rest of User:Lindenhurstlib's uploads as well, sadly, since they clearly didn't understand the license they were supposedly granting. Could you do so, or open a DR if you feel that process is necessary? JesseW (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Hoax flags

I am rather confused what's going on with this hoax flags thing. The original for File:Hualien County flag.png was uploaded to zh:File:Hualien County flag.png. Could you look at w:File:Hualien County flag.png and File:Flag of Hualien County.svg and take the appropriate action? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Flag of Hualien County.svg seems legit for me. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Suppression rapide

Bonjour Thibaut120094 Je te remercie d'avoir initié le débat sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tableau de loge App.JPG, il semble clair, que je n'ai pas apposé la bonne licence sur ce tracé public et j'aurais du la replacé dans le domaine public, comme pour la seconde. Afin de ne pas envenimer un débat qui tourne en rond avec le dit auteur du tracé, je te propose de clôturer en suppression celui-ci au plus tôt. Comme je le dit ce dessin ne représente rien de plus qu'un des énième tracé de loge d'apprenti, comme il en existe des centaines dans le domaine public, inutile de tergiverser autour de paternité ou de droit qui n'existe pas, vu qu'aucun de ses dessins ne pouvant être protéger ceux-ci appartenant à des objets ou des thèmes dit : de grande tradition... code de l'INPI. Merci de ton action. Bien cordialement. --KAPour les intimes 13:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour Kagaoua, OK c'est fait. Cordialement. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup. Cordialement. --KAPour les intimes 13:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GabrielPintabona

Obviously I thought that these ought to be deleted -- they are either out of scope or copyvio. "Out of scope" is not a reason for {{Speedy}}, so I put a DR on them.

The only reason a DR can be closed sooner than seven days is "Deletion requests for obvious copyright violations can be closed earlier." Therefore, when you close a DR before the seven days have elapsed, I think it's important to cite a source for your finding that the work is a copyvio. Without that, you are acting arbitrarily, which hurts Admin credibility. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Got it, fixed the rationale and added a source. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Musée de Bretagne


Merci pour la vérification des comptes du Musée de Bretagne. Puis-je te suggérer d’apposer le modèle {{OTRS}} sur le bandeau {{Collections from Musée de Bretagne}} (comme ce qui se fait sur {{Nationalmuseum Stockholm image}} par exemple) ? Je pense qu’ainsi, la légitimité des versements sera plus visible que les {{Verified account}} sur les PU des employés du Musée et on évitera de reverter des demandes de suppression de la part de contributeurs qui ne seront pas allés voir ces PU.

--EdouardHue (talk) 11:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Salut, si ça se fait sur d'autres modèles alors pourquoi pas. Mais il faudra vérifier régulièrement que le modèle n'est pas utilisé sur des images qui n'ont pas été importés par des employés du musée. Je vais essayer de l'ajouter dans le modèle. Cordialement. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hmmm, je ne suis pas très bon en programmation de modèles, peux-tu le faire toi ? Il suffit d'ajouter {{PermissionOTRS|id=2016061610012701}}. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Les modèles qui sont traduits en plusieurs langues ne sont pas simples à modifier, en effet. Il faut généralement aller modifier la sous-page /layout. C'est chose faite sur {{Collections from Musée de Bretagne}} mais j’ai du passer outre un avertissement de MediaWiki, n’étant pas dans le groupe habilité à apposer {{PermissionOTRS}}. J’espère ne pas me faire reverter à mon tour ^^ --EdouardHue (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


Hi Thibaut120094, I'm so sorry, I've only just found out "Pour Noël, je viens de m'offrir un chauffe-eau. -IdeeCadeau -Originale -PrendDeLaPlaceSousLeSapin" translates as "For Christmas, I just give me a heater. -IdeeCadeau -Originale -PrendDeLaPlaceSousLeSapin (6510868577)",
For some reason I actually assumed the title was descriptive and you were simply shortening it to something meaningless (so basically doing #2 7 backwards),
God knows why I never translated it but I've come to say than you for reverting and for moving it,
Again my apologies, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 16:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem! We all make mistakes ;) --Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


Saluton Tibaut, ho preso la fotografia di Achille Tellini dalla pagina dell'istituto Achille Tellini. La foto ha più di 100 anni e l'autore é sconosciuto. Pertanto dovrebbe essere di pubblico dominio-public domain. Walber (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, you can add this comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Achille-tellini2.jpg. Thanks!   --Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)



Je voulais poster sur le bistro, mais comme mon précédent message sur le sujet est déjà archivé, et vu que c'est toi qui a supprimé les fichiers il y a quelques jours, je retourne vers toi. Je te signale le compte Al walid ben Talal, très probablement du meme auteur, c'est à dire Gloudou. Voir notamment sa dernière image qu'il vient d'insérer sur fr:wikipédia dans un article qu'il viens de créer sous IP, avec un magnifique photomontage avec son (probablement) propre visage (il l'avais déjà fait, voir bistro wp du 25 décembre dernier) ! On a malheureusement là un pénible multi-récidiviste... Merci d'avance. --Skouratov (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, c'est fait. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)



tankyou Thibaut120094

— Preceding unsigned comment added by عدنان حليم (talk • contribs) 15:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Um... you're welcome? I guess. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

FOP en Belgique - Restauration de Masse

Bonjour Thibaut120094,

Je me permets de te recontacter suite à ta très gentille proposition de restauration de masse des fichiers supprimés suite à l'absence de FOP en Belgique.

La loi est entrée en vigueur aujourd'hui, il est donc possible de restaurer tous les fichiers de cette catégorie : Category:Belgian FOP cases

As-tu toujours la possibilité de faire cela automatiquement ?

Un grand merci !

Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 08:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Voici la liste des fichiers que je suis en train de restaurer : User:Thibaut120094/Undeleted, il faudra restaurer manuellement le reste de la catégorie. Il faudrait aussi manuellement retirer les demandes de suppression des fichiers fait. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Un grand merci. J'en ai fait 150 à la main cet après-midi, mais ça va quand même mieux quand c'est un script qui s'en occupe ;-) À bientôt. --M0tty (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
De rien. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Rebonjour ! Un contributeur a dressé une liste de fichiers à restaurer. Il y en a encore un grand nombre. Peux-tu faire tourner un script dessus ? User:Romaine/Sandbox2 Et si tu as la possibilité, d'ajouter le modèle {{FoP-Belgium}} dessus, ça serait encore mieux ! Un grand merci ! --M0tty (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Ok c'est en cours. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


Hi Thibaut120094, Thanks for restoring the images from Belgium. A week ago I made an overview for myself to see how many images were nominated for deletion because of missing FoP in Belgium. Many of these images are still not restored: User:Romaine/Sandbox2. It would be great if you can help to complete the list. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the list I'm restoring the files right now. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
And done (also thanks to Rama). Cheers. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, this went a lot faster! :-) Romaine (talk) 16:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

There are still some missing, which I listed here: User:Henxter/FoP. Henxter (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Merci! Henxter (talk) 20:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for all the work! In the past days I have followed the log for the restoring of files. This monitoring I now will end. I have created an overview of all the restored images. This overview can be found at: User:Romaine/Freedom of Panorama/Belgium. If you restore more images, or if you see someone restoring images because there is now Freedom of Panorama in Belgium, please add the images to this overview or let me know. Thanks!! Romaine (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

PS: On User talk:Romaine/Freedom of Panorama/Belgium I collected some anomalies, including files of what the actual file is missing... Romaine (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


Hey old friend. Do you have a script or gadget for doing undeletions? I tried to help a little on Sasha's OTRS undeletion request, but you were doing at least 5 undeletions for every one of mine...   INeverCry 06:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey INeverCry :) thank you for your help! I used this script. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


Not sure what you were thinking when you wrote this. {OTRS pending}, as opposed to {OTRS received}, gives no status at all to a file. Also missing license for 7 days is a demanding reason for deletion. The {OTRS pending} tag does not change that. Please get yourself more familiar with Wikimedia Commons procedures instead of abusing the name of Jesus while showing your lack of understanding to the community. I hope this is the last time I come accross this kind of behaviour from your side. Jcb (talk) 22:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello to you too.
Thank you for your concern but I am more than familiar with Commons procedures. Don't come here talking about my "behaviour" when you delete more than 300 files that followed our OTRS procedure correctly, adding extra work to admins who have to restore them and to the OTRS agent who have to write the request. It is also not very nice to the uploader who took the time to write to OTRS and adding the template to each file. OTRS backlog is huge, we have a very few active volunteers, it is normal that it takes a while for volunteers to get to the ticket and the files, thus the 30 days grace period.
@Yann, Steinsplitter, INeverCry, Jianhui67, Krd: Hi, what's your opinion on this? Regards. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
I like it best when we work together and help each other. Sometimes we bump heads and irritate each other though; an unfortunate part of life in general. I'd say more, but I've had a sour stomach for most of the afternoon now because of too much morning coffee, so I'm a bit uncomfortable and distracted. I have no idea how Honoré de Balzac drank 50 or more cups of coffee each day... INeverCry 01:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Just because I have been asked: In my opinion Jcb is technically correct, and I don't see why otrs-pending should warrant an extra grace period because anybody could make such claim. Images with otrs-pending will be no-permissions-since _at latest_ after 30 days. (Perhaps this is only my personal interpretation.)
On the other hand, when having a relevant batch of highly valuable images, one could do some search and convert the otrs-pending to otrs-received at least, instead of deleting them. Although this is uncomfortable work (context switch, slow search, etc.) it would have paid back in this specific situation regarding total work amount as well as consumer satisfaction. --Krd 08:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I don't think we should be in a hurry to delete files if a permission is likely to come. Obviously there is a bit of personal interpretation of what is likely, and what is not... Yann (talk) 09:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Thibaut120094/Archive 1".