Nemo bis

Welcome to the Commons, Nemo bis!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Importazioni

Attualmente si può importare solo da meta, en.wiki e de.wiki.--Trixt (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Aah, ecco. Ci provo, non ho mai fatto un trasferimento.--Trixt (talk) 16:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Uhm, aspetta però, non posso importarle con quei titoli. Ad esempio, per it:Galleria immagini del Parco nazionale del Kilimanjaro: qui su Commons esiste già la galleria Kilimanjaro... Secondo me andrebbero inserite nella galleria già esistente su Commons "a mano", con riferimento in cronologia alla pagina di it.wiki (che rimane, se non erro con it:Template:Trasferito. O sbaglio?--Trixt (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Mah, con l'importazione, lasciare un redirect come Galleria immagini del Parco nazionale del Kilimanjaro penso che sia sbagliato, qui su Commons, e verrebbe cancellato a vista (si possono fare i redirect da una lingua ad un'altra, ma in questo caso ad esempio, esistendo la galleria Kilimanjaro, non avrebbe senso). Secondo me la procedura più regolare è trasferire tutte le immagini della galleria su Commons contestualmente inserirendole nelle gallerie/categorie appropriate indicando che la provenienza delle didascalie (perché in pratica credo sia quello, da presenrvare, l'autore di eventuali didascalie) è quella pagina su it.wiki, che andrà lasciata (in ogni caso sono poche, se non erro). altre procedure imho darebbero problemi.--Trixt (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Non so se unire le cronologie in due progetti diversi sia corretto (dopotutto, anche con il login unificato, il "Trixt" di it.wiki potrebbe non essere lo stesso Trixt di Commons - ad esempio, l'it:User:Ignis di it.wiki non è l'User:Ignis di Commons). Io sarei per lasciare un soft redirect; non sarà il massimo, ma in ogni caso sono davvero poche pagine, inutile complicarsi la vita (io parlo delle pagine che sono completamente gallerie - le proposte di trasferimento per sezioni che contengono gallerie mi pare non diano problemi, vanno trasferite senza importazione).--Trixt (talk) 08:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Per il resto: purtroppo non si può fare via bot - le macchine non sanno "vedere" un'immagine e ci sarebbe il problema di correttezza licenza/categorizzazione. Ricordo tempo fa una proposta di trasferire via bot le immagini mettendole in una categoria "di manutenzione" qui su Commons, in attesa di sistemarle, ma chi lo propose venne coperti di improperi dagli admin, per l'enorme sovraccarico di lavoro che comportava. Boh. Io ho creato tempo fa it:Template:Su Commons - speriamo che non lo usi solo io... :( --Trixt (talk) 08:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Si, se lo fai tu, sistemandole subito, non credo ci siano problemi. Magari ti è utile Commons:Tools/Commonist.--Trixt (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Sicuramente Filnik può imbastire qualcosa. Il problema è che bisogna vedere se qui su Commons l'upload via bot di grandi quantità di immagini sia 1) consentito 2) se qualcuno ha qualcosa da ridire - che ne so, magari non si fidano che le metti a posto e che ne carichi solo poche. Il dicorso è che non ho mai visto girare bot che caricano da altre 'pedie, e sicuramente l'idea di farlo as qualcuno sarà pur venuta... A quanto ne so, l'unico bot che trasferisce immagini è User:Flickr upload bot.--Trixt (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Direi Commons:Bots oppure direttamente al Commons:Village pump, per avere più feedback (se non ricordo male era stata discussa qui, la cosa, ma comunque un bel po' di tempo fa).--Trixt (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ac.rokossowski3.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ac.rokossowski3.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ac.rokossowski3.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 01:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Konstanty_Rokossowski_Polski_Mundur.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Konstanty_Rokossowski_Polski_Mundur.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Konstanty_Rokossowski_Polski_Mundur.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Salgari

Lo sai che non ci avevo pensato? Ora controllo e se l'autore è morto da più di 70 anni indicherò l'edizione. Altrimenti cancelleremo l'immagine. Grazie per avermelo fatto notare! Ciao ---Ricce (talk) 10:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Problema risolto! L'illustratore della copertina de "Il Figlio del Corsaro Rosso" (Ed. Bemporad) è Alberto Della Valle deceduto nel 1928 come puoi verificare qui. Quello della copertina de "Il Continente Misterioso" (presente anch'essa nella voce su Salgari) è Giovanni Carpanetto deceduto anch'egli nel 1928 come puoi verificare qui. Ho aggiunto tutte le necessarie informazioni sia alla voce sullo scrittore che nel commento alle immagini. Cordialmente ---Ricce (talk) 16:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

MediaWiki:License/it

Fatto. Grazie--Trixt (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Pagina principale

Ciao. Il link alla pagina in italiano c'è già; se non erro la press release è di Wikimedia UK, non di Wikimedia Italia (è una traduzione, a parte qualche riga).--Trixt (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Ciao. Sul momento mi è venuto il termine in inglese, lo cambio. Se mi dici che non è solo una traduzione, come mi pareva, modifico anche questo. Per Commons:Template_i18n/Most_linked-to_templates: quando mi capitano sotto gli occhi li traduco io; non ci sono altri utenti che lo fanno, se non sporadicamente. A volte li traducono gli admin stranieri con i traduttori automatici, in attesa di miglioramenti.--Trixt (talk) 11:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

DjVu files

Hello, I uploaded a 15 MB djvu file on December 2, 2009. Yann (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Segnalazione

Grazie per la segnalazione. Devo prestare particolare attenzione a qualche dettaglio? --Lord Hidelan

Categorie

Grazie per il consiglio, cercherò di metterlo in pratica ;). PS: scusa per il ritardo, ma sono stato in wiki-pausa fino a pochi minuti fa ;) Fale (talk) 15:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Batch uploading?

I'm not sure I understand the point of this edit. The Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition was a fair in Seattle in 1909. While many of the relevant images were batch uploaded, many were not: I personally have scanned (or photographed) and uploaded several dozen. - Jmabel ! talk 17:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I've just followed this list, feel free to revert. Nemo 17:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

OK, I will revert: it was the target of a batch upload, but much in the category does not come from the batch upload. - Jmabel ! talk 19:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Category:Wikimedia Italia Assembly 2010

 Done. Multichill (talk) 10:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

CommonsHelper2

Con ritardo ma fatto: m:CommonsHelper2/Data it.wikipedia. Ti ringrazio molto per la segnalazione. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Théngs

Diciamo che non c'erano motivi contrari, ha pesato una certa inesperienza nelle discussioni comunitarie. -- Blackcat (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Merging

Ciao. Avevo sbagliato io a mettere il template corretto ;) Ora dovrebbe essere a posto: {{Wikipedia-screenshot}} in {{Wikimedia-screenshot}}.--Trixt (talk) 09:38, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Jessica_Tandy_1940.jpg

File:Jessica_Tandy_1940.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

South Tyrol at Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012

Ciao, mi permetto di scriverti in inglese, visto che mi sento più a mio agio in questa lingua. Sorry, but I guess there is a misunderstanding. This is more or less a small initiative from the de:Portal:Südtirol. We have a couple of users there, who will create a couple of monument lists for South Tyroelan municipalities (see de:Kategorie:Liste (Baudenkmäler in Südtirol)) and upload a couple of pictures... That's it, no need for a massive project management, a permission or an authorization by a chapter, an organization plan or whatever. If the Italian chapter finally decides to participate in this contest (and I hope so!), feel free to remove South Tyrol from the list, since it may be regarded as a small subdivision. But as long as there is no final decision from the Italian chapter, please don't remove South Tyrol. We will participate anyway, no matter what the chapter says. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 12:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Could you please show me the guideline that we need a permission by a chapter to participate? And well, I'm not a lawyer, but publishing pictures of buildings, whose architects died before 1941, is certainly not illegal (i.e. estimated 95% of all cultural heritage monuments in South Tyrol). Otherwise you should start a deletion request for the complete content of the Category:Buildings in Italy. Anyway, good luck for your collaboration with the ministry. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 12:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Are you planning to create a project site? I'm interested to see, if you get the permission to take pictures of the still protected buildings. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 12:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps we could think about an cooperation between WMIT and WMAT for South Tyrol WLM? Many lists will be on de.wp, so it would be a logical consequence :) Greets --AleXXw 01:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Mai-Sachme, sadly, I didn't look at that category, but most photos actually are illegal, because everything considered "cultural heritage" needs a permission (with a fee) to be photographed, in Italy. There are many photos on Commons because Commons doesn't care about non-copyright restrictions and users can take their risks, but still it's something which as an organisation we can't promote as far as it's against the law. The matter is, sadly, very complex. We don't have public pages about it because we're examining a lot of different ways to address the issue and we don't know how it will end. Nemo 16:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

AleXXw, we'd certainly love to have a cooperation! But again, I'm only the messenger here, you should talk with Aubrey and the board because they're taking care of this. Nemo 16:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

email

Could you please check your email? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for the upload :) -mattbuck (Talk) 15:51, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Re:Cancellazioni e "mezzi illegittimi"

E tu ci stai pure a credere. Sono loro che hanno toppato da principio, cancellando i file a cuor leggero. Perfavore non ti ci mettere pure tu. :) raul (talk) 15:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Ma sono cose non vere. Io proprio non ne ho idea cosa intenda per 2mezzi illegittimi". raul (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Ponte vecchio di Pavia

Effettivamente mancava quanto meno un fiume... Grazie per la segnalazione. Discanto (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Il cat-a-lot ce l'ho selezionato ma non ha mai funzionato... Mi sarebbe piaciuto anche avere il pop-up di navigazione ma qui su Wikimedia mi pare che non ci sia.... Discanto (talk) 23:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Ho dovuto usare gli occhialini di mia nonna ma alla fine l'ho trovato... Grazie. Discanto (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Panoramica de la Isla de San Carlos, Estado Zulia.jpg

Excuse me, how I can fix this type of problem, I see that you have corrected the issue of the thumbnails, however, I would like to learn to do, thank you very much --The Photographer (talk) 02:23, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Translatewiki.net

Hi! Honestly speaking, I don't know how to load lang. names from CLDR code or convert non-ASCII codes to UTF-8 :/. I'm using NetBeans IDE and it's stored that way... Yarl ✉ 18:40, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs

Hi Nemo. I regret, but due to overwhelming amount of work I can't promise to deal with this request any time soon. tsca (talk) 10:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

I am afraid my bot has not proper permission for this operation. It is for book operations, not for general picture operations. Ankry (talk) 14:14, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Spamming talk pages

Hi Nemo, please don't spam talk pages. Multichill (talk) 12:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, what qualifies as spam for you? Thanks, Nemo 12:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

This does. Leaving the same message on a large number of talk pages is spam. Multichill (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, your definition is just too generic to be truthful/useful. --Nemo 22:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

PenWho.gif Please be careful not to destroy the animation

I don't understand what your idea is where you deleted the whole animation, why did you do that ? Penyulap ☏ 14:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: Convert all interlaced JPGs

Hello, I'm so sorry, I can't give help in your request.--Avocato 13:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

You are now a license reviewer

Hi, I've closed your request and granted you the reviewer user right. Before you start reviewing, make sure to read Commons:Flickr_files. Also remember COM:FOP & COM:Flickr washing. I recommend installing the review script into your .js file with importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); - it simplifies the choices and gives you thank you text to post with your Flickr account. You can add {{User reviewer}} to your user page as well. If you ever have questions, Commons:License review is pretty thorough on the process, you can ask me, or just wait for another editor to review a questionable image. Good luck!

Mono 03:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! --Nemo 08:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Logo of Classical Chinese Wikipedia

Thanks for your quick reply. I have renewed the logo according to the rules you stated, please renew them as soon as possible, thanks!

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-zh-classical (updated).png, File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-zh-classical (updated).svg--ItsMine (talk) 11:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Gan Wikipedia's logo

Hey, I made an answer on Odder's talk page.--Symane (talk) 07:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Could you please explain what "freely licensed font" is? I used "Hei" and "Kai" for the title and subline which are used the most often in China. Besides, do you think we shall argue only for 1 or 2 millimeter? If you insist, of course, I can try not crossing the line. Regards.--Symane (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Please see Odder's talk page. Clairification on the copyright and modification for the subline have been made, I hope the change of the logo could be quickly implemented. Thanks.--Symane (talk) 11:34, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Do you have any concrete proof that the two fonts (Hei and Kai) I used for the logo are copyrighted, as my quotation clearly attests they are not?--Symane (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-gan-135px.png

UMing's version

New version with AR PL UMing is made, how about it?--Symane (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks so much for the feedback on the Welcome to Commons draft! I've done a big set of revisions based on the feedback so far; if you have a chance, please take a look and let me know if you notice anything else that can be improved. We're hoping to have the text more or less set by a week from now, so that the designer can get started building the layout.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Categories

Nemo, I did go down that route quite a while ago, but was put off by the inaccessibility of the category system—just learning what the likely options were appeared to be laborious. Tony1 (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

UniversalLanguageSelector

Hi Nemo,

FYI, I opened Commons:Requests for comment/UniversalLanguageSelector to try to move forward with this

(I thought it would be better to separate the issues with ULS and with the Translate extension).

Feel free to edit the proposal at will!

Jean-Fred (talk) 12:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

he won't persecute the next until he's busy with the last.

I think you mean "until he's done with". -mattbuck (Talk) 13:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Commons:Reporting abuse

I'm not sure, it just seems like a different solution to the same problem. odder (talk) 11:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:Ritratti WMCON

Non si potrebbe tramite WMI mandare una mail a tutti i partecipanti segnalando la categoria in modo che poi decidano loro cosa fare con il proprio ritratto? Comunque uno (e mi pare uno solo) mi aveva chiesto esplicitamente di non metterci il nome. Ti mando il link via mail. --Jaqen (talk) 11:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Il logo della Prima pagina di Wikipedia nella versione eml - emiliàna rumagnòla che avete spedito là al Bar, ha scritte imprecise

Ciao, Nemo bis, sorry di non potere accettare il logo così come ce l'avete mandato, ma, così come ho anche appena scritto al Tuo collega Cbrown1023, le diciture giuste, a mio avviso, dovrebbero essere: Vikipedìa - L'ensiclopedìa lîbra. Come, però, ho spiegato anche al Cbrown1023, ci sono ancora controversie su quale debba essere l'esatta grafìa (enciclopedìa oppure ensiclopedìa?) e pertanto avremmo bisogno della settimana di tempo che proponete, per parlarne intanto fra noi.. --Gloria sah (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Trovata la scritta giusta da mettere al logo per eml-wikipedia

Ciao, Nemo, dopo alcuni accertamenti, a maggioranza abbiamo visto che le scritte migliori da mettere nel logo per l'eml-wiki, sono: "Wikipedia l'enciclopedéia lébra". Ci pensi Te ad aggiustare il logo così e a spedircelo aggiustato nella ns. prima pagina?! Grazie, --Gloria sah (talk) 05:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Ciao, Nemo, a dire la verità lo scorrere vano del tempo non nuoce.. poichè sinceramente mi sono accorta di avere prevaricato quelle che sono le prerogative del ns Amministratore, il simpatico Mirandolese! Pertanto credo di fare cosa giusta se gli posterò le ultime perplessità di odder in modo che sarà lui stesso a prendere le decisioni e a risponderne.. Scusami tanto :-j --Gloria sah (talk) 12:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

image reviewer

(Just for the record:) Hello, I have removed the "autopatrolled" flag from you Account. "image reviewer" right includes autopatrol, so this right is redundant , Regards--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Re:

Not in my view. MachoCarioca (talk) 03:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for the explanations on the Translate extension, you were very helpful. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

:) --Nemo 10:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

thanks!

		The Commons Barnstar
		Thanks so much for giving feedback on the Commons brochure! You can see the print version here. Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons brochure source files

Hi Nemo! Here is a zip file of the InDesign source (24MB) for the Commons brochure. The Scribus version is still pending. Let me know if you have any problems with it.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

If Jean-Fred doesn't first, I'll probably paste in the text next week on the Commons page so that we can set it up for the translate extension. I haven't ever worked with InDesign myself (only Scribus), but I think replacing the blocks of text is going to be straightforward (if tedious) for someone who knows how to use it. And no, it's just my personal dropbox account; I just wanted to get it in a shareable form as soon as possible. If it's allowed, I'll get it onto wikimediafoundation.org as a more stable home soon; I know that we typically do that with the Scribus source files, but I'm not aware of us hosting InDesign source files (even though those are more commonly what people are looking for).--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 18:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I've copied the text, which I think Jean-Fred will set up for translation.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

btw

I'm not 100% up on my copyright but this is probably a vio.Volunteer Marek (talk) 15:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Immagini Egitto

Grazie per la spiegazione e ti rispondo qui per non intasare il bar. Ho messo la categoria a qui, mi controlli, per cortesia, se è ok? Volevo metterci la descrizione in italiano, ma non ci sono riuscita. Però è importante indicare la dinastia perchè credo che le date siano anche molto importanti per la ricerca. Credo che ti disturberò ancora, ciao.--Amaunet (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Fae

In order to get counted, you should move you vote from the comment section into the voting section. --Túrelio (talk) 16:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

classico di "tizio"

Scusami Nemo, sicuramente mi sarà scappato per via della foga, puoi indicarmi dove lo ho scritto? comunque più di un amministratore qui su commons ha usato "classico di" riferendosi a me, è brutto lo so (mi ricordo anche esattamente una discussione dove è successo.. quindi immagino rimanga impresso e sia brutto obbiettivamente). Per favore mi dici dove l'ho scritto? --Pava (talk) 20:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

ho visto a cosa ti riferivi, ho rimediato penso nel modo più corretto possibile, ho lasciato la scritta ma l'ho barrata e ho posto in small le mie scuse, non è mai mia intenzione litigare o prendermela con qualcuno o rivaleggiare un altro utente porta solo a perdere tempo e danneggiare wikipedia e in questo caso commons e a rovinare i contributi e le voci/file basta vedere il rapporto irrecuperabile che ho con FAEP (da cui nasce tutta questa storia per una sua ripicca) scusami ancora, ciao a presto --Pava (talk) 20:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kohs_with_MyWikiBiz_screen.jpg

The title of the file is "Kohs_with_MyWikiBiz_screen.jpg", not "Koh's_face.jpg". The image survived Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Kohs_with_MyWikiBiz_screen.jpg. Can you please upload the cropped version onto its own file page instead of overwriting "Kohs_with_MyWikiBiz_screen.jpg"? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Nope. The crop is an obvious improvement for the stated purpose (including the current usages of the file) and title, so it can't be considered a substantial change unless you think that only the repetition of the logo was the point of the image. The guideline, as I said, doesn't forbid such overwrites. --Nemo 05:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

I split the images myself:

• File:Kohs_with_MyWikiBiz_screen.jpg
• File:Kohs_with_MyWikiBiz_screen_cropped.jpg

I don't see any reason why we can't have both files. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 08:41, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Tool

Grazie per il link, avevo già sbirciato. A me non serve. Ho già detto svariate volte che io mi faccio la mia brava gallery da 500 foto a mano e sono a posto così. Se il resto del comitato preferisce usare il tool, che lo dica ASAP. Io non so nemmeno chi sono, gli altri, figuriamoci capire cosa vogliono fare. Ciau, --Elitre (talk) 15:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Apprezzo: ce l'avevo proprio fra i bookmark, comunque a quella internazionale non sono iscritta. Quella ITA, invece, la leggo in digest come tutte le altre - per cui richieste time-sensitive come l'ultima tua mi arrivano a mezzogiorno del giorno dopo, e non c'è granché che possa fare in quel momento. A presto, --Elitre (talk) 16:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

re: UploadWizard and Opera

I don't want to upload test files to see right now, but I've never gotten such a script error myself (although UW does hang for a little while when it's submitting everything at the end of the upload process). Matma Rex (talk) 09:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Dutch Pronunciations =

I was greatly helped by Curious https://nl.wiktionary.org/wiki/Gebruiker:Curious

• 1. He reacted enthousiasticly when I started to do 'some pronunciations'
• 2. He advised me to use the 'skhoota' program with this program it is possible to make 15 word files every minute

http://shtooka.net/

• 3. He advised me to use coomonist for uploading the thousands of files

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Commonist

• 4. He helped me to find a volunteer who made a 'bot' to put all the file in the dutch wiktionary
• 5. By the end of the year I hope to finish the dutch wiktionary (1250 words a day !!)

Greetings Marcel Coenders

Re:

Grazie. Non so se posso chiedere a te, mi chiedevo ad esempio se per la Category:Biblioteca_Sandro_Penna realizzata dall'architetto Italo Rota ed in assenza di Freedom of Panorama per l'Italia avessimo il consenso alla pubblicazione. So che per Wiki Loves Monuments ci sono autorizzazioni speciali, ma mi chiedevo se valesse anche per quanto riguarda i diritti dell'autore dell'opera. --Grifomaniacs (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Bene così allora! --Grifomaniacs (talk) 08:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 02:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Wiktionary

Hi there, Nemo_bis. If you're not too busy, can you please review this edit protected request? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Done. odder (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Napoleon Bonaparte w Gdańsku

I write you because of this...
but we need this:

File:Napoleon table on Mount Gradowa (Gdańsk-Poland).jpg

File:Napoleon table on Mount Gradowa (Gdańsk-Poland).jpg
can be deleted soon, because I don't know the author & cannot get permission

take a look please

Drodzy polscy przyjaciele !

Mój przyjaciel ma pobrać ten plik z internetu , ale nie notowane , w którym została podjęta .

Mamfotograf nie może ustalić z wyszukiwarki grafiki Google.

Wikipedianiemiecki personel pomógł mi dowiedzieć się, gdzie znajduje się ten pomnik . Jest z tobą w Gdańsku .

Niestety fotografia nie ma prawa autorskie do tego zdjęcia . Nie będzie prawdopodobnie usunięta szybko .

Na Commons , nie ma więcej zdjęć z tego wspaniałego zabytku .

Fotografia search = Napoleon + Memorial Fotografia search = Napoleon + Gdańsk

W związku z tym moja prośba : Czy ktoś z was kilka zdjęć z tej tabeli , aby Napoleon na wzgórzu Gradowa i ustawić ją na Commons. Category:Napoleon reduit in Gdańsk

Czy istnieje strona z tobą jak niemiecki Wikipedia: Informacje? Napisz do mnie Diskussion:Frze.

Dziękuję i pozdrawiam --Frze ^{> talk} 19:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Frze, thank you for noticing my photo, I had almost forgot that nice moment. I'm afraid I can't help you with that monument. As my photo shows, I had other things in my mind; I remember that I tried to look at the fortifications but I didn't really manage to do so and I know nothing of that "Napoleon table". :( --Nemo 20:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Where are you from? Do you have friends in Gdansk, can you to invite them to a walk to that table? ?Frze ^{> talk} 20:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm from Italy and I don't know anyone in city I'm afraid. Have you checked Flickr? --Nemo 21:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Nemo bis⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

A matter of Foundation templates

Hi, there seems to be a flurry of related edits on a certain file. I have processed the related OTRS ticket only against the information provided, and all the related reports are now licensed in the same format. This included this change. I am aware of the WMF staff template, however the OTRS ticket was a personal release. As there is some debate with regard to who paid whom, or who was under contract to whom, I suggest leaving this for the time being. Hopefully there will soon be "official" statements and it may be best to revisit the format or what templates to apply at that time.

From an OTRS and licensing perspective what has been done is sufficient. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Nemo bis,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Erik Kripke.jpg

--  Gazebo (talk) 08:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Pardon me

... but I think I've seen you over on the Internet Archivve & thought you might be able to clue me in.

I do .djvu & .pdf source file "fix-ups" when I have the time over on en.wikisource and I run into this problem every so often on IA when attempting to [re]derive a file that I've "patched" for eventual source-file replacement upload to Commons.

Long story short... What is the best way to get folks over there to re-start the "derive" process once it craps out for any number of their "mysterious" reasons. I'm talking about

https://catalogd.archive.org/history/poetryarchitect02ruskgoog

for example. TIA & if you can reply on my en.WS talk page that would be swell too. -- George Orwell III (talk) 21:46, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Frame

Stavo vendendo enciclopedie :) --iopensa (talk) 15:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Illustrations_by_work

Illustrations by work has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Danny lost (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

svgo

does all kind of strange things our renderers, including native browser rendering cannot catch up with. I have therefore reverted File:Openstreetmap logo.svg. -- Rillke^(q?) 14:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

The native browser rendering I had fixed with an appropriate prolog, but yes, rsvg didn't like it much. I hoped someone could fix the rendering without increasing the size (it's quite a performance drain e.g. on translatewiki.net main page) but revert is the right thing to do at this point. Thanks! --Nemo 14:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

That's interesting. Do you have data bout the performance drain? -- Rillke^(q?) 14:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

I noticed from stats like [1] vs. [2] (422 vs. 1019 KB downloaded). Most of it was a PediaPress logo that svgo reduced by 98 %... Just ask webpagetest to measure the main page a few times and compare results with lighter vs. those with heavier SVG logos. The 20 KB of OSM logo are not an emergency, for sure, but I don't care if someone with broken clients sees an incorrect PediaPress logo when that allows to download 400 KB less. --Nemo 15:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

You are using the SVG directly, of course. Maybe fork the OSM Logo. It was just that I used PNG thumbnails created from it in user scripts. -- Rillke^(q?) 15:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes, Nikerabbit made it so because usually the SVG is lighter. Sure, no big deal, I've already reuploaded locally. :-) --Nemo 15:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

your quote

Your statement on VP has been cited/reproduced here: [3], [4] --Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Good to know, thanks for the notice. --Nemo 14:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Trademark policy icons

Hi Federico, when I saw the icons used in meta I made some of them better, and made others to replace the worst of them. It is almost not to see the difference but nevertheless I made the replacements. You reverted it. If you do not like when I try to make things better, I take distance from interfering with your domain. Sorry if my edit upsets you. sarang♥사랑 12:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:MediaWiki screenshot

Template:MediaWiki screenshot has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ANIBAL CAUSSIN (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Anass Iloughmane

Hi! Could you comment on the above deletion request which eventually is involving a misuse of {{Supported by WWF}}, created by you? Thx. Gunnex (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Re

Delle volte penso che quella riogranizzazione sia forse una delle poche cose buone che ho fatto su wiki. Ben poca cosa... Credo di aver scoperto che per il jet lag funziona che se gli dici "non ho tempo per stare male" ti lascia in pace. (Oppure la formula "arrivare di sera - tornare il sabato per riprendersi la domenica" paga. Boh?) Grazie per le modifiche! (Ti ho lasciato un mess su Meta. Non so dove la gente abbia letto che per la questione degli upload locali deve chiedere al mio team, ma era la seconda domanda in una settimana.) --Elitre (talk) 14:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Nemo bis. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:PenWho.gif

File:PenWho.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Keφr (keep talk here) 18:55, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: borsa "Alessio Guidetti" per Wikimania

Grazie per l'invito che è già un gradito riconoscimento del mio frequentare Wikipedia. Credo che altri meritino più di me di cogliere questa occasione e poi non amo fare grandi viaggi intercontinentali. Grazie ancora per il pensiero e cordiali saluti.--Albertomos (talk) 08:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Borsa Wikimania

Ti ringrazio per la segnalazione, ma attualmente non posso proprio permettermi un viaggio. Di nuovo grazie per la stima concessami. --Carnby (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Grazie x la segnalazione, Nemo

Ti ringrazio molto, Nemo, x la sollecitazione. Il fatto è, però, che io sono un utente molto adulto, e in questa fase ho pochi Wikimedia-progetti e molti impegni, familiari e non. La sommatoria delle 3 precondizioni mi rende il Messico lontano come la luna... Ti ringrazio ancora molto x l'attenzione ;). --Lalupa (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Ciao Nemo, grazie per la segnalazione anche da parte mia. --Discanto (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Un sincero grazie di cuore per la segnalazione. Lodevole l'iniziativa di intitolare la borsa ad Alessio/Cotton, un modo eccellente per onorarne la memoria. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Mi unisco anch'io nel ringraziarti per la segnalazione. --Ciaurlec (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ti ringrazio per la cortesia che mi hai usato, sei stato davvero molto gentile. Non penso che con il carattere combattivo che ho, io sia molto adatto a partecipare a incontri. ma grazie in ogni caso per l'atto di gentilezza. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 23:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Allora la dico in modo meno diplomatico: finirei per litigare con qualcuno, quindi è meglio che io resti fuori dagli incarichi. Per il resto, visto che mi descrivi come Nembo Kid, fosse mai che domattina mi sveglio e scopro che so anche volare... No, temo non vada così. Grazie in ogni caso per la stima. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Borsa "Alessio Guidetti" per Wikimania

Caro Nemo bis, ti ringrazio dell'invito ma non sono interessato.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 22:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Minurca.gif

File:Minurca.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 06:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Work on its own ...

Hi Nemo bis, are you sure this is correct? I really can't imagine it is. Where you say "therefore," it is actually not "therefore" -- other jurisdictions also assume "that a creative photo of a painting is not plagiarism of the painting itself, but a work on its own," but it doesn't follow from that that "it's allowed for the photographer to release any sufficiently creative photo of any painting." It just regularly means there are two works, protected independently of each other -- and re-using them requires two licenses, one from either of the two right holders. Best, — Pajz (talk) 11:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: toollabs:erwin85/relatedchanges.php

Ti ringrazio ugualmente. Speriamo che la palla sia raccolta da qualcuno e che il problema venga risolto. Ancora ti ringrazio. Saluti. --Discanto (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Nemo, lo sapevo che eri un artista. Mille grazie e supersaluti! --Discanto (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

talkback

Hello, Nemo bis. You have new messages at Ellin_Beltz's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:Foto Cobis

 Fatto ;-) --AlessioMela (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Foto Cobis

Fatto. - Laurentius (talk) 12:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

helo

Monsif nachit (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

IA Upload

Hi Nemo, I uploaded a document (2 pages) on archive.org. I try to move them here on commons, with IA Uploaded Bot, but the tool says: no file found. Where is my mistake I cannot figure out. Can you help, please? -- Violetova (talk) 11:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Re:WLM Bolzano

Ciao Nemo, scusa il ritardo, leggo solo ora. Ok, indagherò, anche perché voglio cercare di risalire agli organizzatori dell'edizione altoatesina. Ne ho già parlato un po' con un utente tedesco che è venuto a Trento per il compleanno di Wikipedia, e magari con il suo aiuto potrei riuscirci. Dalla prossima settimana mi metterò ad indagare. Ti farò sapere. --CristianNX 17:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

File:La fatica del wikicitatore.jpg

File:La fatica del wikicitatore.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Re:Categorie

Eh lo so, ho usato l'azione "Anteponi del testo". O forse "Concatena del testo" è ciò che può fare al caso mio? In ogni caso, grazie per avermi fatto scoprire questo strumento. Per i file sui quali ho già operato, confido che prima o poi passi un bot a fare ordine :-) --Cristian Cenci (WMI) (talk) 10:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File provenzano

Ciao, quella immagine non è stata messa in nessun giornale. Tartufo12312 (talk) 20:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Non lo scattata io però sul sito credo che sia scaduta la licenza o non c'è Tartufo12312 (Discussione) 21:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

La foto è stata scattata nel 2006. Tartufo12312 (Discussione) 21:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Mi scusi, ma artistica cosa si intende? Tartufo12312 (Discussione) 21:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tartufo12312 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Totò Riina

http://m.leccenews24.it/attualita/una-data-una-storia-15-minuti-per-mettere-fine-alla-carriera-criminale-di-toto-riina-il-capo-dei-capi-.htm Tartufo12312 (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC) O ancora meglio http://qn.quotidiano.net/cronaca/2013/01/15/830407-mafia-venti-anni-fa-arresto-toto-riina-corleone-si-scusa.shtml

La discussione non diceva il sito della foto presa e in proposta di cancellazione. Tartufo12312 (talk) 22:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Io non sono tanto pratico di wikimedia commons ma la fonte dell'immagine e ANSA il vero autore che ha scattato la foto. Ho tralasciato la fonte dove diceva che la foto e stata scattata da ANSA.--Tartufo12312 (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Mi è arrivata la segnalazione di una possibile cancellazione delle immagini

Ho aggiunto delle immagini alla pagina Michael Jackson e sono a "rischio" cancellazione. Vorrei sapere perchè e se puoi dirmi quali immagini posso usare (sono nuovo quindi è un mondo nuovo per me ahah) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Interista1908 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 06 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Casa della Meridiana

Non si trova in via Quadronno, come tu avevi scritto, bensì in via Paolo Marchiondi. Bastava un semplice controllo.--Arbalete (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Bene, allora se lo sai perché hai inserito un indirizzo errato? Via Quadronno fino a prova contraria è una via con un tracciato ben definito; le vie parallele sono vicine a via Quadronno, ma non sono via Quadronno.--Arbalete (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Via delle forze armate

I nomi propri si scrivono con la lettera maiuscola.--Arbalete (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Ciò che tu trovi più utile è indifferente. Qui si dovrebbero seguire le regole della lingua italiana, non i gusti personali.--Arbalete (talk) 15:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Aiuto:Maiuscolo e minuscolo: I nomi di vie cittadine, strade, piazze e in generale delle vie di comunicazione devono avere sempre la parte generica in minuscolo e quella particolare in maiuscolo (ad es.: via Roma, piazza del Mercato, corso Italia, autostrada del Sole, strada statale Appia, strada statale 1 Aurelia, ferrovia Circumvesuviana, via XX Settembre).--Arbalete (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy new year!

	Merry Christmas, Nemo bis!
	English: Hellow Nemo bis, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC) --The Photographer 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Templates to check

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Copyrighted_free_use/i18n
  • I'm not sure if I did this one right. Please check, as I see many languages on the /lang page, so this must be important. One thing I notice is that even though I include the languages, I don't see them appear.
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:CopyrightedFreeUse-Link/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:CPL/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:DGA_map/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
  • Please look at this one closely too. One translate tag encompasses a lot of text, and I'm not sure why the languages thing are?
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:DSL/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:EdictGov-Bangladesh/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
  • This one I made pretty large translation units, so please take a look and see if it's ok.
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:EPL/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Europeana_PD-own_upload/i18n (DONE: PLEASE CHECK)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Flickr-no_known_copyright_restrictions/i18n
  • I'm not sure why the language thing is not there here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MtDu (talk • contribs) 04:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:HU_banknote/i18n
• I have done the following three templates myself, first migrating using the Move feature. Please check. Some don't have the /lang subpage, but I was still able to do everything else.
  • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Iranian_currency
  • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:KOGL
  • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:KOAL

I have begun work on Template:Flickrreview MtDu (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

• I have finished importing translations, modified the i18n file to include a language header, changed autotranslate to ext.translate, and removed the lang stuff from /lang subpage. however, I can't change the base to i18n or the layout to remove lang stuff because I can only view source on those pages. I also can't move en to i18n/en for the same reason. Let me know what to do, or if you can do it for me. ;) MtDu (talk) 14:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

I have finished Template:RCE-license here. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:RCE-license Please check when you get a chance. MtDu (talk) 00:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

I have finished https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-USGov-NPS/i18n and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:HABS-source. MtDu (talk) 01:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Wrong location

Hi Nemo bis, there are several of your files with wrong location Category:Media with erroneous locations. Could you please fix that? --Arnd (talk) 12:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Nemo bis, do you know where these wrong coordinates come from? I see them in Exif data. Does the camera adds them in this way? --Arnd (talk) 13:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Strange behavior of the camera. Seems to be a bug in the firmware that needs to fixed. Anyway, thank you for cleanup. --17:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Nemo bis, again several files appeared in Category:Media with erroneous locations. Could you please fix the locations? Thank you for your cooperation, --Arnd (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Nemo bis, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:2017 views of Vienna 22.jpg

File:2017 views of Vienna 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Jura

Non pensavo fossero così nascoste. --Ilario (talk) 18:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Paolo De Caro (4754858098).jpg

File:Paolo De Caro (4754858098).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.35.197.133 09:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Re:

Grazie per il link. --Elitre (talk) 09:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Re:Parametri archeowiki

Rimosso! Non ricordo perché lo avevo inserito, forse avevo copiato da qualche template simile in cui aveva un'effettiva utilità... --Jaqen (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

menzione a progetto GLAM

Ciao Nemo

Diciamo che io sono nuovo a simili iniziative e al di là del mio contributo attivo nell'inserimento di foto e dati non conoscono ancora bene il mondo di wikipedia e wikimedia. Cosa è GLAM e di cosa si tratta?

--Prc90 (talk) 15:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Menzione su Commons Bar

Caro Nemo, ti ringrazio molto per la segnalazione. In questo periodo ho davvero un sacco di "carne al fuoco", come si suol dire, altrimenti mi sarebbe piaciuto chiedere maggiori informazioni. Ciao e buon anno, Silvia --Silvia Girometti (talk) 16:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

D'accordo, se mi capita lo farò senz'altro! :)) --Silvia Girometti (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Dati Camera images

I was putting the actual source link on them all when I realized that you just licensed reviewed them all. Without a direct source link we could just go down this road again in the future. I had already done about 200 of them. Some of them needed further searches to find an exact source. Doing them all without replacing any of the link just made my job a whole lot harder. --Majora (talk) 21:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Incontri wikipediani

Grazie Nemo, se riesco il 24 faccio un salto a Torino.--Prof.lumacorno (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Ohi ohi, mi sa che questo we non ci sono, se c'è qualche nuovo incontro fammmi sapere.--Prof.lumacorno (talk) 11:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Daticamera

Ti segnalo che non devi verificare massivamente dei file in modo automatico, usando una pagina Wikipedia come URL cone hai fatto con le foto di dati.camera.it: si tratta di un abuso della funzione di licensereviewer. Vanno usati gli URL da dove provengono i file, altrimenti il controllo è totalmente inutile. Le tue modifiche sono tutte riviste da un altro utente in questo momento (e le altre, annullate); vedi la crono di File:Vincenzo D'Arienzo daticamera.jpg ad esempio per vedere come si fa, se non lo sapessi. Al prossimo abuso ti si potrebbe levare la funzione. Ciao --Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Meno male, mi hai fatto preoccupare. Io mi sono fatto uno script che aggiunge l'url originale, così sarà più facile verificare la fonte. Buon lavoro allora. --Ruthven (msg) 08:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Credo che sia necessario, onde evitare che qualche utente "scrupoloso" in futuro metta tutto in cancellazione. --Ruthven (msg) 08:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Piccolo problema...

Ciao Nemo, scusa se ti disturbo ma mi sembri la persona più adatta per cercare di risolvere un problema. Semplicemente ti chiedo se puoi segnalare il non funzionamento di questo utilissimo tool che già da un bel po' ha smesso di funzionare. A meno che addirittura non lo possa riparare tu stesso… Tutto qui. Grazie. --Discanto (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monument

Hi, You sent me a message that is supposed to use a list from here, but my name is on in the list (and I have never participated in Wiki Loves Monument, especially in Italy). It's not important, of course, but maybe there is a problem with the tools you are using? Cheers, Seudo (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

guarda io ho messo le foto dei lecci senza riferirmi a coordinate specifiche anche perchè al giardino pubblico di palazzolo non c'è nessun albero che viene considerato specifico o monumentale e onestamente a cercarlo tipo rabdomante con il gps non mi andava , alla fine il comune ha dato la liberatoria per tutto il giardino pubblico, e forse ho sbagliato a tradurre perchè avevo interpretato veteran tree come alberi dei veterani (inteso di guerra) e non come albero antico o veterano, anche perchè in pratica sono tutti così, gli alberi di leccio furono impiantati per i morti nella prima guerra mondiale , in teoria ce ne sarebbe dovuto essere uno per ogni caduto con un targhetta ma penso che non si realizzò mai sta cosa perchè i morti sono stati 319 , e prima del sottoscritto nessuno aveva fato una ricerca specifica in tal senso eccetto il ministero con gli albi d'oro, comunque le foto degli alberi le ho messo così per non lasciare vuota la tabella--Elyparker (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Re: Categorizzazione WLM

Grazie del suggerimento, non conoscevo la funzione del wiki-id, lo farò!--Carlodell (talk) 09:43, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Carl Benedict Mesterton black and white photo.jpg

Hi, please provide some evidence why the author of this work would be anonymous rather than unknown to us. Without such evidence the license you reinserted cannot be used. Jcb (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

The description already provides it, if you feel the contrary please explain why on the talk page. --Nemo 10:38, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Please explain how the description tells us that the author did not disclose their identity? There is not a word on it in the description. Jcb (talk) 10:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Finnish Wiki Loves Monuments finalists selected

• 
  Kansalliskirjaston eteläsali
  Valokuva: Marit Henriksson
• 
  Helsingin tuomiokirkko
  Valokuva: Julie Tsarfati
• 
  Herttoniemen kartano
  Valokuva: Edwardina von Boxis
• 
  Hossan värikallion kalliomaalaus
  Valokuva: Eerik Lehto
• 
  Petäjäveden vanha kirkko talvipäivänä
  Valokuva: Maarit Siitonen
• 
  Sunilan tehtaat ja asuinalue. "Maailman kaunein tehdasrakennus" talvella kuvattuna Kymijoen Huumanhaaran yli.
  Valokuva: Janiwiki0
• 
  Tampereen tuomiokirkon katto
  Valokuva: Old Pionear
• 
  Särestöniemen erämaatila ja ateljee, maatilan sauna
  Valokuva: Hti-358
• 
  Tönnönkosken silta ja myllypaikka
  Valokuva: Pia Simonen
• 
  Vaajakosken vanha vesivoimalaitos
  Valokuva: Teuvo Salmenjoki

Finalistit / Finalists

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments -valokuvauskilpailuun! Suomen kilpailuun lähetettiin yhteensä 3464 kuvaa 98 kuvaajalta. Näistä valittiin 10 valokuvaa kansainvälisen kansainväliseen finaaliin. Tuomaristoon kuuluivat valokuvataiteilija Mojo Erämetsä, graafikko Tommi Kovala, rehtori Riitta Moisander, vierailijaprofessori Elina Paasonen, valokuvaaja Jussi Tiainen ja valokuvaaja Soile Tirilä. Suomen kilpailusarjan voittaja julkistetaan palkintojenjakotilaisuudessa Kansallismuseon Ateljeessa Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18.11.2018 klo 13.00. Tervetuloa! Suomen WLM-tiimin puolesta,

Thank you for participating Wiki Loves Monuments photography contest! Altogether 3464 images from 98 photographers participated in the Finnish competition. 10 photos were chosen for the international final. The jury members were photography artist Mojo Erämetsä, graphic designer Tommi Kovala, rector Riitta Moisander, visiting professor Elina Paasonen, photographer Jussi Tiainen and photographer Soile Tirilä. The winner of the Finnish competition will be announced at the award ceremony at the National Museum of Finland Atelier Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18 November at 1.00 pm. Welcome! On behalf of the Finnish WLM team,

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) & Kimmo Virtanen (Zache) (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Chiarimento messaggio caricamento foto

Buonasera, ho caricato dei file per partecipare al concorso wiki loves monuments. Tuttavia, Mi ha scritto che: 1) le foto sono già presenti in facebook e che dovrebbero essere mie 2) molte foto hanno lo stesso nome: Chiesa di San Pietro in Ortanella e non si può usare lo stesso nome per più cose.

Pe il primo punto preciso che alcune foto erano già presenti su facebook, in quanto sono mie e le avevo pubblicate io stesso sul mio profilo e sono state fatte da me 2) ho usato lo stesso nome in quanto ho ripreso lo stesso luogo da punti di vista diversi.

Con queste precisazioni è possibile procedere?

Rimango in attesa e ringrazio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca Venturati (talk • contribs) 15:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Grazie per il celere riscontro, sulla seconda osservazione mi rifacevo al fatto che mi ha indicato che "Inoltre è indispensabile usare gli identificativi corretti, non va bene aver usato quello della chiesa di Esino Lario per tutto": io ho indicato lo stesso nome, perchè si trattava dello stesso luogo, in caso, come da lei indicato posso numerare.

Saluti. Luca Venturati — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca Venturati (talk • contribs) 15:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Ultima domanda, lei riesce a verificare se e con quali foto io sto partecipando al concorso WLM?

Grazie ancora — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca Venturati (talk • contribs) 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter/sk

Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter/sk has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

170.185.24.14 18:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Flickr

Your bot is adding random files to Category:Flickr. Please disable that. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the report. That flickrripper run has already ended. It wasn't random files anyway, but files manually tagged with "Flickr". Nemo 16:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Duplicates

....please check your upload robot for duplicates.Your pictures loaded by Flickr - sunoochi are all duplicates and are a lot of work and a waste of time. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the report and sorry if you had extra unwanted work. My flickrripper.py run does check for duplicates. Some may slip though but I'm getting them speedy deleted myself when I'm done with each round of uploads, you can ignore them for a few days. Nemo 08:16, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello Nemo, so that you find the duplicates better, I give them to the Category:Duplicates by AnankeBot. So the files are only for you and other users edit them (hopefully) not further. Thank you . Orchi (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure what's the purpose of the category. If you feel an urge to handle those files immediately rather than have them handled by me in the next 48 hours or so, please just mark them for speedy deletion. Thanks, Nemo 15:58, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

....it's just a temporary help category. Other users had already worked with your uploads and the many predetermined categories. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

That's fine and appreciated of course, but I don't plan to use this category. Thanks, Nemo 15:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Tag

Per favore chiedi prima di taggare le persone, è già sufficientemente seccante sui social, dover rincorrere queste derive anche qui proprio no. Grazie. --Civvì (talk) 09:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

I nomi erano già tutti nella categoria. Nemo 09:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Un conto è un nickname lì in un angoletto (che nessuno si fila) un conto è taggare le foto ;-) Se a qualcuno interessano le informazioni che faccia 'sto sforzo di cercarsele. --Civvì (talk) 10:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Interessante interpretazione e opinione legittima, puoi aprire una discussione in proposito e vedere se c'è un consenso in tal senso. Nel frattempo continuerò a fare ciò che in Commons è prassi dal 2009. Grazie, Nemo 10:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Cioè? La prassi è taggare la gente senza chiedere? Interessante declinazione della netiquette. --Civvì (talk) 10:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Non so bene che cosa tu intenda con "taggare la gente". Uso le annotazioni dal lontano 2009 e può sempre essere che certi usi siano superati o che io invecchiando li ricordi male. Può certo essere utile una discussione con nuovi punti di vista da parte di utenti di Commons più freschi e/o con esperienze di altri siti web e social network, ma aprirla qui non mi pare costruttivo. Nemo 10:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Con taggare la gente intendo esattamente questa roba qui. Prendere il mio faccione e attaccarci il mio nickname in modo che chicchessia, passando il mouse sopra l'immagine veda l'associazione. E' una funzionalità che persino il social network più scabercio prima di renderla visibile chiede "sei d'accordo?". --Civvì (talk) 10:41, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Santuario.jpeg

Ciao, tu che conosci la mia storia, ti volevo avvisare che l'immagine in oggetto non appartiene assolutamente alla raccolta della famiglia riggio nella maniera più assoluta. Infatti se tu noti le altre foto sono tutte antiche e il proprietario, è vissuto negli anni del 900. Non so chi ve lo ha aggiunto. se mi ritieni in fiducia se si può cancellare grazie. --Meganino (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy

Ti pregherei di non cambiare le informazioni senza consenso. Suggerire che fotografare i monumenti italiani "non sia OK" è un atto criminale che mette a rischio migliaia di caricamenti. Lascia la pagina sul copyright italiano così com'è o almeno chiedi prima di cambiare. non vogliamo in nessun modo suggerire cose false, ossia che non si possono caricare fotografie di monumenti italiani il cui copyright è scaduto. Queste regole (come quella imposta dal sindaco di Positano per instaurare una tassa/permesso per ogni ripresa professionale nel suo comune) non valgono su Commons. Sono equiparabili a regole locali, il cui valore non trova applicazione altrove. --Ruthven (msg) 08:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Ma assolutamente no, te lo stai sognando. Le opere il cui copyright è scaduto si possono caricare su Commons. Il codice Urbani è qui considerato come le regole di quei musei che ti impediscono di fotografare le opere esposte anche se sono nel pubblico dominio. Lo puoi fare e puoi legalmente caricare le fotografie qui: è una questione fra l'utente ed il museo. --Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

L'unica cosa che ti posso concedere è di levare que OK davanti ad " Additionally..." - ma senza mettere un  Not OK che sarebbe totalmente fuorviante. Ti pregherei anche di non entrare in edit war, cosa non permessa sui progetti Wikimedia. --Ruthven (msg) 08:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Tu sei partito in una crociata solitaria senza chiedere niente a nessuno. Usare il campo oggetto è richiesto a tutti gli utenti autoverificati, quindi figurati se è un grande sforzo quello che hai fatto nel fornire le "motivazioni"!

Non mi hai ancora indicato dove hai dedotto che fotografare monumenti in Italia sia "Not OK". Qualsiasi tentativo da parte tua (o di chiunque altro, non ce l'ho per nulla con te in particolare) di suggerire una tale bestialità sarà accolta da un blocco in scrittura, fra due settimane, due mesi o due anni che sia. Ciao --Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

See, buonanotte. L'importante è che tu abbia capito. In ogni modo, parlando di errori: [5]. --Ruthven (msg) 09:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Visto che stiamo nello spirito di dare consigli:

• Non inserire cose a caso nelle talk degli utenti (es: ti ho contattato, mi pare)
• I consigli sono ben accetti, ma evita di scrivere cose senza senso come "sono qui da molto tempo più di te", sull'esperienza non voglio guardare l'edit count, ma già immagino da che parte pende la bilancia.
• Le linee guida autorizzano gli amministratori a difendere il progetto con gli strumenti che hanno a disposizione, siccome sembri conoscere bene le linee guida non te le linko, ma ti lascio meditare sul tuo agire.

--Ruthven (msg) 10:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Ma infatti, non era per imporre la mia volontà. Quella pagina ce l'ho fra gli osservati speciali (come tante altre) proprio per evitare modifiche improprie. È un vandalismo che ho rollbaccato, indipendentemente da quello che potevo aver aggiunto io (che poi era minimo rispetto al resto). Cerca di capire che le cose devono essere chiare anche per chi non è familiare con le regole di Commons o le leggi italiane: instillare il dubbio su qualcosa che è nel pubblico dominio è pericoloso. E sei attivo qui da tanto tempo come dici, dovresti ricordarti dei danni fatti e delle centinaia di foto cancellate da quei due utenti che un giorno sostennero che il PD-Italia non era contemplato dalla legge USA. ancora oggi stiamo pagando le conseguenze, con gravi danni al progetto. --Ruthven (msg) 11:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. What is "Copyleft enforcement"? I saw one of my files there. I took that picture myself, but now am not sure with which camera or cellphone. The actual MD shows a strange date and other data. In 1971 I had not had a camera yet, and I guess there were no cellphones. (If I can calculate the shooting year well, I must have taken that pic with my mostly-used Blackberry or perhaps a primitive Nokia in which I had to find Yahoo internet page to enter into my mailbox... :) Thanks in advance for a "simple" reply for a non-IT person. --E4024 (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi! It's a sample of images that I want to run through https://infringement.report/ to find whether they've been abused by people who don't respect the license. It's to defend you as photographer, not to accuse you. ;) Nemo 21:04, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-Verbot.png

You didn't preserve the transparency... AnonMoos (talk) 04:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Right, I only took an existing up to date version. Nemo 04:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your AnankeBot

seems to add Category:Nature of Germany based on the authors description (which is Stiller Beobachter from Ansbach, Germany), but ignores to take coordinates into account. See

• 
  northern Atlantic
• 
  Nova Scotia
• 
  Madeira

etc. Can you please train your bot to be better in categorizing stuff? regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing it out. It's just using flickrripper in a semi-automated way where I add the categories depending on the album etc. I don't think this category came from the tags. What's the best tool to show the images of a category on a map, to identify such outliers? Nemo 09:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm using geohack to map a lot of coordinates, but it often fails (especially with many coordinates): e.g. for Nature of Germany (which is alredy clean): https://tools.wmflabs.org/osm4wiki/cgi-bin/wiki/wiki-osm.pl?project=commons&l=2&usecache=0&article=Category:Nature_of_Germany --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Indeed, I used to use Geohack too but I was wondering if there was something better. I'll try again the next time. Thank you, Nemo 15:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Krmaher tweet 27 Jun 2019.png

Hi Nemo bis, please do not put other people's work under a {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} license as you did here nor add {{WMF-staff-upload}} tags to any file which was not uploaded by WMF staff as you did here. Please open a deletion request if you think that this tweet is eligible for copyright. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 19:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

It would be disruptive to file a DR if I don't believe the file is a copyright violation. The current template is however false. Nemo 19:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

The current template is the only one which allows it to be kept as we have no release of its text under a free license. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

The theory of the original uploader is that this tweet is relevant to Commons because the text was written in the capacity of WMF ED. The WMF ED, like every other WMF employees, signed a contract which places all their works under cc-by-sa in such cases. If the theory under which the image was uploaded is incorrect, then the image is out of scope. Nemo 20:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Whether something is relevant to Commons or not is a question of COM:SCOPE but does not change copyright. The tweet was written using her personal Twitter account. Any assumption that anything she tweets or publishes elsewhere outside of the WMF projects magically becomes {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} has no legal ground. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure, which is why I avoided such an assumption. Nemo 08:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Ok but why did you then tag this file with {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}? --AFBorchert (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

I explained it above. Nemo 12:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

This appears to be in conflict with your statement that you avoided such an assumption as you made this assumption when you tagged that file with {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. As explained above, private tweets by WMF employees are not magically released under a Cc-by-sa license. What the original uploader thought is irrelevant. We can just keep this file if we consider the text of the tweet to be ineligible for copyright as we have no release under a free license. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

No. I helped the uploader express in a legally correct and defensible way his conclusions about the status of one specific tweet. Out of nowhere, you talk about "assumptions" about "anything she tweets or publishes", but that's your own doing. On the other hand, you have added a much more dramatic statement about copyright eligibility of such a sentence, a precedent which can have widespread consequences on all of Wikimedia Commons. I encourage you to avoid such sweeping generalizations.

You are free to insist on your very "innovative" usage of {{PD-text}}, but please don't go around lecturing other users for copyright statements of much lesser consequence. Nemo 14:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry but I do not see anything “legally correct and defensible” in tagging that tweet {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} without having any proof for that claim. However, I believe that this tweet does not possess a minimal amount of creativity which would make it eligible for copyright. See for example this article or this one according to which most tweets remain ineligible for copyright. This tweet consists just of 89 characters and 14 words – without any originality or wittiness but just a little outburst including an expletive. This is way below anything that could be eligible according to the aforementioned articles. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

I already provided the legal basis for that tagging, I'm not going to repeat it. You link an article which talks about how "facts are not copyrightable" and then you go on talking about completely unrelated matters such as how many characters were in that tweet. Again, feel free to push this personal view (I would probably be happy if the law agreed with you) but don't claim it's anything more than that. Nemo 19:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

See Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags

--Arnd (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes I know, Vicuna doesn't handle these. Will remove once the upload is done. Thanks for the note, Nemo 15:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, Nemo 17:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

AnankeBot & cats

As someone who's worked extremely hard to get the numbers down on Category:Unidentified buses in the United Kingdom I'm rather angry to see the numbers go from something like 250 to now 5,347 all thanks to your bot!,
I think it's highly unfair to upload 5 thousand bus images here and then expect everyone else to do the work .... so was you going to categorise these because I can promise you now I certainly am not and no one else will either because I'm the only person who categories the images there,

I appreciate this was probably done due to the whole Flickr licence thing but still 5 thousand images is a lot and like I said I'm not sorting through that amount,
That being said if Commons/WMF were to pay me the UK minimum wage to sort through them I happily would,
Thanks. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 17:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your categorisation work. I greatly appreciated and admired the tidy tree of categories; I seem to recall that these new files were somehow complementary to the past, in that they sometimes allow to add new categories.

I do plan to sort out at least the most obvious (and tedious) cases over the next few years when I'm in "bus mood" and I'm done with uploading my own photos. Nemo 18:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

No worries, I apologise if I sounded rude above that certainly wasn't my intention,

Unfortunately buses and coaches can be bodied (so ie "Caetano Levante bodied Volvo B9R" or "Caetano Levante bodied Scania K EB") - Finding out the chassis (Volvo B9R, Scania K EB) etc etc etc) can only be done by searching for the number plate on Flickr,

Had it been a simple case of just "Caetano Levante" without the chassis then I would've happily done the lot but as I said to categorise buses and coaches would require Flickr numberplate searching for each and every individual image which for 5 thousand images is impossible,

Many thanks, –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 19:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Nemo bis,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

---

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2018-07 Ivalo 041.jpg

File:2018-07 Ivalo 041.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola ^{t • c} 16:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

File:2018-07 Ivalo 042.jpg

File:2018-07 Ivalo 042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola ^{t • c} 16:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

File:2018-07 Ivalo 043.jpg

File:2018-07 Ivalo 043.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola ^{t • c} 17:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te

Wikimedia Italia

Gentile Nemo bis,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché ci vuoi particolarmente bene e hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments più di un anno.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Photos from Urho Kekkonen National Park

I just found your photos from the UKK Park, taken in July 2018. Thanks for them! I'd however love there to be some more information. I suppose you made a day trip along some marked route. If so, one could perhaps infer many of the locations. There are a couple of main entrances to the park along E75 (national road 4), at Saariselkä (the main resort, with the fells Kaunispää and Iisakkipää), Kakslauttanen (resort a few kilometres from E75, by Kiilopää) and Tankavaara (gold museum). There are also those at Kemihaara (Korvatunturi trail) and Nuorttijoki (circle trail down the river) in Savukoski, and near the Raja-Jooseppi border crossing in the north-east. I think I wrote them here in decreasing order of probability. --LPfi (talk) 08:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Mass "Evacuation" copy of Public domain resources from Internet Archive to Commons.

Thanks for the vote of support and technical information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Also if there's a way to feedback information to IA -File:Bulletin des arrêts du Tribunal de cassation (IA bulletindesarr09hait).pdf( and related uploads of the same name.) The publication dates for this vary between what's physically in the work, what IA says the date is (possibly copy-pasted or entered for a series?) and, the date given on Worldcat. It needs someone to 'up their game' in terms of the metadata being provided, so that there's ONE clear publication date instead of three. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Mibac

Ciao Nemo, mi pare che curasti tu la crezione di questo template. Recentemente c'è stato un problema con alcune immagini che avevo caricato dell'Accademia della Crusca, di cui avevo parlato anche al Commons:Village Pump. Per farla breve mi chiedono di includere nelle immagini una versione del template Mibac con un paio di piccole correzioni. Secondo te ci vorrebbe un nuovo template o basterebbe creare una variante in questo? In particolare le modifiche sarebbero:

• SOSTITUIRE da parte del Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali CON da parte dell’Accademia della Crusca
• SOSTITUIRE ivi inclusa l'associazione, con qualunque modalità e in qualunque contesto, dell'immagine suddetta a messaggi pubblicitari di qualsivoglia genere... CON ivi inclusi gli usi editoriali, commerciali e l'associazione, con qualunque modalità e in qualunque contesto, dell'immagine suddetta a messaggi pubblicitari di qualsivoglia genere...

Pensi sia fattibile? Mi potresti aiutare in questa operazione? Grazie mille --Sailko (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

me lo chiedono dall'Accademia stessa, dove recentemente è successo un po' di casino per via delle mie foto del 2017... Foto concordate con alcune persone dello staff senza però probabilmente rendersi conto di tutte le implicazioni delle licenze libere, e senza mettere per iscritto nessuna autorizzazione, per cui io mi trovo in mezzo a una situazione con possibili ripercussioni legali in cui non ho nessuna voglia di finire. Con quella parte di staff che mi aveva autorizzato a suo tempo abbiamo trovato questa "pezza" del template Mibac, soltanto che il presidente ha chiesto qualche piccola variazione di testo. La mia domanda è: siccome si tratta di un template più complesso di quello che sembra, potresti aiutarmi a capire se è meglio creare una variante nel template stesso o farne uno ex-novo? E se potessi aiutarmi a fare questo template te ne sarei estremamente grato. --Sailko (talk) 17:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Nemo_bis,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Nukkelimiitti, Desucon Frostbite 2014 - 18.jpg

File:Nukkelimiitti, Desucon Frostbite 2014 - 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wikimedia_logos_variants

Wikimedia logos variants has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Please unblock my IP(s)

Ciao Nemo, I hope that you are doing fine. I am Claudi Balaguer, user Capsot, eternally blocked on Meta... I can't write to any administrator in spite of what the message says in Meta so I had left you a message on Wikiquote but I guess you didn't see it yet. Since I am currently Amical Wikimedia's treasurer I kindly ask you to unblock my IP(s) (not my Capsot user though) so I can work/edit the data concerning the Midpoint report and other things. Moltissime grazie. Buona estate! Claudi/Capsot (talk) 11:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC) PS: I would also appreciate having the right to vote for the Board since I have been denied this right for ages! Grazie ancora una volta :)

Answered. Nemo 11:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Nemo bis,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Turku campus

Thanks for your images of the university campus in Turku (2019). I am renaming and changing descriptions of some of them. As there are two universities in the area, Åbo Akademi and Turun yliopisto (by their native names), "Turku university" can be misleading. –LPfi (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for sorting the photos! Nemo 12:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Lotta Svärd

The statue Lotta Svärd is under copyright in Finland until 2069. In Finland FoP for commercial purposes applies only if the copyrighted work isn't the main subject. In 2019-05-18 Turku university 01.jpg I think it is. I suppose I should nominate it for deletion. –LPfi (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it will then be placed in the appropriate Category:Undeletion requests category for future usage. Thanks, Nemo 12:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

I used {{Speedy}}, after copying to fi-wp as fair use. I will list it in the category. –LPfi (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Done. –LPfi (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Nemo bis/Copyleft enforcement

User:Nemo bis/Copyleft enforcement has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

File:2017-02-22 Helsinki 2.jpg

File:2017-02-22 Helsinki 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

kyykaarme (talk) 20:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Amor próprio.jpg

File:Amor próprio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mztourist (talk) 09:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Uploads from Flickr without proper descriptions and categories

I noticed that your bot AnankeBot uploaded a few years ago, thousands of photos by Antonio Vera from Flickr. But without proper descriptions (about for instance subject and place), let alone good categories. The files were put in Category:Public transport. How can these photographs ever be found by others to be reused (what is the goal of Commons)? This morning I moved the majority of them to Category:Buses. Now I would like them to better categorize, but that is an impossible task because there are no clues where to. What do you have in mind to solve this problem? JopkeB (talk) 10:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for working on categories. These files actually have quite descriptive titles, with operator and line/bus number. The plate numbers can be extracted automatically later if necessary. This collection includes photos of many underrepresented bus operators in parts of the world where we don't have many Commons users. It can be useful when somebody needs photos from a particular bus operator or vehicle: when finding what they're looking for, they'll also be in the best position to add categories and further metadata as needed for the purpose.

In short, these photos don't really need to be proactively categorised in order to be useful, although of course that's nice if someone enjoys doing it for the sake of the puzzle. Nemo 10:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, User:Nemo, for your quick and clear reply. I did not see that the cryptical file names and descriptions were about bus operators and line/bus numbers. Perhaps these files could be hold together in a new category like Category:Files of buses of known operators to be categorized or something similar. Then the main category where they are now (Category:Public transport) will be less overcrowded.

But anyway, all my changes of files with buses of this morning have been reverted by a know-it-all, so I'm not going to burn my fingers on that anymore. JopkeB (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hah. That's why I'll refrain from any mass changes. ;) Don't feel bad about it, categorisation is a difficult art and we get it right iteratively. Nemo 20:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Milano, 1999 - C'era una volta una fabbrica.pdf

File:Milano, 1999 - C'era una volta una fabbrica.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Aklempert.jpg

File:Aklempert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akl (talk) 13:14, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Seriously

What's the deal? Why do are you keep spamming DRs I've opened with the same condecending, cookie cutter keep measages? Whatever your in for the comments clearly aren't constructive and violate the assumption of good faith. So I'd appreciate it if you stopped with it already. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 20:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2021-06-30 Elokapina Queerkapina 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)